cdbg‐mit: budget justification of retail costs

10

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jun-2022

1 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs
Page 2: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs
Page 3: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

Applicant/Subrecipient: 

Site/Activity Title:

Eligible Activity: 

Materials/Facilities/Services $/Unit Unit Quantity Construction Acquisition Total

Water Well 850,000.00$         EA 1 850,000.00$         850,000.00$           

Well Control Panel / Electrical 50,000.00$           LS 1 50,000.00$            50,000.00$             

Elevated Platform 50,000.00$           EA 1 50,000.00$            50,000.00$             

12" Transfer Pipeline 100.00$                LF 700 70,000.00$            70,000.00$             

Pipeline Fittings 20,000.00$           LS 1 20,000.00$            20,000.00$             

Main Electrical Disconnect and Wiring Replacement 100,000.00$         LS 1 100,000.00$         100,000.00$           

Pipeline Connection to GSR 20,000.00$           LS 1 20,000.00$            20,000.00$             

Painting 10,000.00$           LS 1 10,000.00$            10,000.00$             

Existing Tank Demolition 100,000.00$         LS 1 100,000.00$         100,000.00$           

Proposed 500,000 Gallon Tank 1,950,000.00$     LS 1 1,950,000.00$      1,950,000.00$        

Site Fence 20,000.00$           LS 1 20,000.00$            20,000.00$             

Gravel Road 30,000.00$           LS 1 30,000.00$            30,000.00$             

Tank Piping Extension 30,000.00$           LS 1 30,000.00$            30,000.00$             

Tank Electrical Supply 40,000.00$           LS 1 40,000.00$            40,000.00$             

Tank Property Acquisition 10,000.00$           LS 1 10,000.00$        10,000.00$             

8" Water Main 70.00$                  LF 4900 343,000.00$         343,000.00$           

8" Water Main RR Bore with Casing 350.00$                LF 150 52,500.00$            52,500.00$             

8" In‐Line Valves 1,200.00$             EA 13 15,600.00$            15,600.00$             

Fire Hydrants 6,000.00$             EA 12 72,000.00$            72,000.00$             

3/4" Service Connections 2,500.00$             EA 13 32,500.00$            32,500.00$             

2" Service Connections 3,500.00$             EA 3 10,500.00$            10,500.00$             

4" Service Connections 4,000.00$             EA 3 12,000.00$            12,000.00$             

Asphalt Pavement Repair 25.00$                  LF 450 11,250.00$            11,250.00$             

Concrete Pavement Repair 50.00$                  LF 1650 82,500.00$            82,500.00$             

Main Line Fittings 7,000.00$             EA 3 21,000.00$            21,000.00$             

Traffic Control 20,000.00$           LS 1 20,000.00$            20,000.00$             

Silt Fence 2,800.00$             LF 4 11,200.00$            11,200.00$             

TOTAL 4,024,050.00$      10,000.00$        4,034,050.00$        

Date:Phone Number:

CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

(Former Table 2)

Cost Verification Controls must be in place to assure that construction costs are reasonable and consistent with market costs at the time and place of 

construction.

Seal

Signature of Registered  Engineer/Architect 

Responsible For Budget Justification:

Yoakum, Texas

All Sites

Water System Improvements

Page 4: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

Applicant/Subrecipient: 

Site/Activity Title:

Eligible Activity: 

Materials/Facilities/Services $/Unit Unit Quantity Construction Acquisition Total

Existing Tank Demolition 100,000.00$          LS 1 100,000.00$          ‐$                    100,000.00$        

Proposed 500,000 Gallon Tank 1,950,000.00$       LS 1 1,950,000.00$      ‐$                    1,950,000.00$     

Site Fence 20,000.00$            LS 1 20,000.00$            ‐$                    20,000.00$          

Gravel Road 10,000.00$            LS 1 10,000.00$            ‐$                    10,000.00$          

Tank Piping Extension 30,000.00$            LS 1 30,000.00$            ‐$                    30,000.00$          

Tank Electrical Supply 40,000.00$            LS 1 40,000.00$            ‐$                    40,000.00$          

Tank Property Acquisition 10,000.00$            LS 1 10,000.00$        10,000.00$          

8" Water Main 70.00$                    LF 4900 343,000.00$          ‐$                    343,000.00$        

8" Water Main RR Bore with Casing 350.00$                  LF 150 52,500.00$            ‐$                    52,500.00$          

8" In‐Line Valves 1,200.00$               EA 13 15,600.00$            ‐$                    15,600.00$          

Fire Hydrants 6,000.00$               EA 12 72,000.00$            ‐$                    72,000.00$          

3/4" Service Connections 2,500.00$               EA 13 32,500.00$            ‐$                    32,500.00$          

2" Service Connections 3,500.00$               EA 3 10,500.00$            ‐$                    10,500.00$          

4" Service Connections 4,000.00$               EA 3 12,000.00$            ‐$                    12,000.00$          

Asphalt Pavement Repair 25.00$                    LF 450 11,250.00$            ‐$                    11,250.00$          

Concrete Pavement Repair 50.00$                    LF 1650 82,500.00$            ‐$                    82,500.00$          

Main Line Fittings 7,000.00$               EA 3 21,000.00$            ‐$                    21,000.00$          

Traffic Control 20,000.00$            LS 1 20,000.00$            ‐$                    20,000.00$          

Silt Fence 2,800.00$               LF 4 11,200.00$            ‐$                    11,200.00$          

TOTAL 2,207,495.00$       2,834,050.00$      10,000.00$        2,844,050.00$     

Date:Phone Number:

CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

(Former Table 2)

Cost Verification Controls must be in place to assure that construction costs are reasonable and consistent with market costs at the time and place of 

construction.

1. Identify and explain the annual projected operation and maintenance costs associated with the proposed activities.

2. Identify and explain any special engineering activities.

Seal

Signature of Registered  Engineer/Architect 

Responsible For Budget Justification:

Yoakum, Texas

Water System Improvements

Yoakum Elevated Storage Tank Replacement and Water Main

Page 5: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

Applican

t/Su

brecipient: 

Site/A

ctivity Title:

Eligible Activity: 

Materials/Facilities/Se

rvices

$/U

nit

Unit

Quan

tity

Construction

Acquisition

Total

Water W

ell

850,000.00

$          

EA1

850,000.00

$            

‐$                  

850,000.00

$             

Well C

ontrol Pan

el / Electrical

50,000.00

$             

LS1

50,000.00

$              

‐$                  

50,000.00

$               

Elevated

 Platform

50,000.00

$             

EA1

50,000.00

$              

‐$                  

50,000.00

$               

12" Tran

sfer Pipeline

100.00

$                  

LF700

70,000.00

$              

‐$                  

70,000.00

$               

Pipeline Fittings

20,000.00

$             

LS1

20,000.00

$              

‐$                  

20,000.00

$               

Main Electrical D

isconnect an

d W

iring 

Rep

lacemen

t100,000.00

$          

LS1

100,000.00

$             

‐$                   

100,000.00

$              

Pipeline Connection to GSR

20,000.00

$             

LS1

20,000.00

$              

‐$                  

20,000.00

$               

Gravel R

oad

20,000.00

$             

LS1

20,000.00

$              

‐$                  

20,000.00

$               

Painting

10,000.00

$             

LS1

10,000.00

$              

‐$                  

10,000.00

$               

TOTA

L1,190,000.00

$        

‐$                  

1,190,000.00

$          

Date:

Phone Number:

CDBG‐M

IT: Budge

t Justification of Retail Costs

(Form

er Ta

ble 2)

Cost Verification Controls m

ust be in place to assure that construction costs are reasonab

le and consisten

t with m

arket costs at the time an

d place of 

construction.

1. Identify and exp

lain the annual projected operation and m

aintenan

ce costs associated with the proposed activities.

2. Identify and exp

lain any special engineering activities.

Seal

Sign

ature of Registered  Engineer/Architect Responsible 

For Budge

t Justification:

Yoakum, Texas

Water System Im

provemen

ts

Brushy Creek W

ater W

ell

Page 6: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

LAT:

N29

.173

22LO

NG:

W97

.085

84

PRO

POSE

D 8"

WAT

ER P

IPEL

INE

PRO

POSE

D 12

"TR

ANSF

ER P

IPEL

INE

PRO

POSE

D W

ATER

WEL

LPR

OPO

SED

500,

000

GAL

ELEV

ATED

TAN

K(R

EMO

VE E

XIST

ING

250,

000

GAL

ELEV

ATED

TAN

K)

CON

NEC

TIO

N T

O E

XIST

ING

GRO

UN

D ST

ORA

GE T

ANK

LAT:

N29

.163

85LO

NG:

W97

.093

74

KOETHERHI

GHW

AY 7

7-A

HIGH

WAY

77-

A

FOREST

IRVINE

NO

RTH

BOVINE

FRONT

LOTT

McCARTY

NO

RTH

KENEDY

DUNN

DUNN

SIMPSO

N

CADW

ELL

SCHWAB

EDGAR

SIMPSO

N

EDGAR

HICKEY

RUHMAN

HUCK

SCHILL

NIEMANN PLAZA FLATO

WIMBERLY

PLAZA

WIM

BERLY McKINNON

FLATO

NIEMANN

SCHILL

HUCKLOW

RANCERUHM

ANHICKEY

HERMANELVIN

CECILIA

CECILIA

PHILLIPS

XAVIER

ALEXANDER

WELHAUSEN SLADEN

ROBARD

HALLERBENNETT

DAYLYMcGEE

BARE HAGAN

MATHEW

ELKCAPITOL

CARRUTH

TRIBBLE

OAK RIDGE

DAVIDSON TUCKER

ARMSTRONG

MOFFITT

BINGHAM

MONTGOMERY

JOHNSTON

HILLRANNEY

DAVIS

DAVIS

N. S

OU

TH

HERDERPARK

SOUTHWELL

ELENORA

ELENORA

DAVIS

MRAZ

HENRIETTATRIMMEL

WILLIS

ROSE

LESTER

KENEDY

DUKE

ORANGESCHRIMSHER

VICTORIAHENRIETTA

HUBBARD

KENEDY

TRIMMEL

ROSS

LAVACA

LAVACA

POSTHEFFERMAN

SVOBODA

RITTNER

CULBERSON

EDWARDS

HENRIETTA

MINNIEGORDON

THERESACHRISTIANA

JOHN

STEEN

SHEEHAN

TEXAS

LURYANRASKA DR.

DUNN

LANDER

CAMMIESCHENCH

McVEAN

S.SOUTH

AURORA

EHLERS

BOYLE

BALDW

INMIGL

CULPEPPER

BOYLE

TOZIK

GAETNER

WEST

POTHWEST

GRAND

W. MAY

BURKETT

NELSON

HOPKINS

GREEN

WEST GONZA

LES

HUTCHISON

BOLSTER

YOAKUM

PRUETTARNOLD

PATTON

MARTIN SAN M

ARCOS

FINK

JULIA

DULLYE

OLD SH

INER ROAD

CULPEPPER

CRITTENDEN

JAMES

CLARK

PAT CLEBURNE

GARRETT

TURNER

VOLLENTIN

E

TOM MARSH

ALL THIRD

SECOND

FIRST

DALLASHOUSTON

PORTER

WACO

CLARK

AUSTIN

HAMILCROSS

PERRY ORTH

CLARK

RYAN

BAXTER

CHARLES

CRISSW

ELL

PAT CLEBURNE

MANN

PAT CLEBURNE PRICE

COKE

WHITFIE

LD

PECAN

DELPHIN

A

WALN

UT

MAPLE

COKE

KENT

MAPLE

CLARK

BENNET

SHEPPARD

RIGGS

GREEN

VOLLENTIN

E

HIGHLAND

COKE

KENT

STATE HIGHW

AY 111

EAST GONZA

LES

E. MAY

E. HUGO

E. MORRIS

NELSON

HOPKINS

W. MAY W. GRAND

W. HUGO

W. MORRISW. HOCHHEIM

E. HOCHHEIM E. SCHLEICHER

E. GRAND

E. HUGO

E. MORRIS

E. HOCHHEIMPINCHAM

CONCRETE

HOPE

ANTIOCH

JAKUBIKDODD

COOPER

DUCEY

JOSEPHINE

O'CONNERBURT

WILSON

AUBREYO'CONNER

BURT

BULWER

PULLIAM

EDGAR

WARD

AIRPORT ROAD

F.M. 3

475

AIRPORT ROAD

N. SOUTH ST.

HIGHWAY 77-A

KAHN

JOSEPHINE

INDUSTRIAL L

OOP

WALNUT

SCHOTT ROAD

RYAN

STATE HIGHWAY N

O 111

SIMPSON ST

SOUTH

ERN PA

CIFIC

RAILR

OAD

CARROLL

STEIN

MANNCARROLL

WESLEY

GALLOWAY

TRINITY

ALDER

GATEST. CLAIR

WALTER

COLLEGE

JACKSON

ELWOOD

E. HICKEY

OAK RIDGE

CARL RAMERT DRIVE

SLADEN

YOAKUM MUNICIPAL A

IRPORT

RUPP

ERT

DUCEY

LAKES

IDE KIM

BERLY

WILSON - WAGNER

HARRIS

CRISSW

ELL

LAREDO

W. MAY

FINK

TUCKER

N SOUTH

OLD SH

INER ROAD

PINCHAM

MATHEW

KOETHER NO. 2 KOETHERHI

GHW

AY 7

7-A

DEWITT

COUNTY

LAVACA COUNTY

HIGH

WAY

77-

A

EXH

IBIT

1C

ITY

OF

YO

AK

UM

, TEX

AS

GLO

MIT

GR

AN

T A

PPLI

CA

TIO

NW

ATE

R S

YST

EM IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

OV

ERA

LL S

ITE

PLA

N

TRC

EN

GIN

EER

S, IN

C.

LE

GE

ND

PR

OP

OS

ED

8" W

AT

ER

P

IP

ELIN

E

PR

OP

OS

ED

12" T

RA

NS

FE

R P

IP

ELIN

E

PR

OP

OS

ED

W

AT

ER

W

ELL

CO

UN

TY

LIN

E

WA

TE

R V

ALV

E

FIR

E H

YD

RA

NT

PR

OP

OS

ED

500,000 G

AL T

AN

K

YO

AK

UM

C

IT

Y LIM

IT

S

AutoCAD SHX Text
\\AUSTIN-FP1\INFRASTRUCTURE\WORK IN PROGRESS\YOAKUM\XXXXXX GLO MIT GRANT APPLICATION (2020)\EXHIBIT\11X17 GRANT EXHIBITS\WATER EXHIBIT 1 OVERALL SITE PLAN.DWG - 9/10/20 - 9/10/209/10/20
AutoCAD SHX Text
505 E. HUNTLAND DRIVE, STE. 250 AUSTIN, TX 78752
AutoCAD SHX Text
T.B.P.E. FIRM REGISTRATION # F-8632
AutoCAD SHX Text
(512) 454 - 8716
AutoCAD SHX Text
0
AutoCAD SHX Text
2000
AutoCAD SHX Text
1000
AutoCAD SHX Text
2000
AutoCAD SHX Text
4000
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE : 1" = 2000'
Page 7: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

HICKEY

HUCK

SCHILL

NIEMANN

BOYLE

TOZIK

GAETNER

JACKSON

PRO

POSE

D 12

" TRA

NSF

ER P

IPEL

INE

PRO

POSE

D W

ATER

WEL

L

CON

NEC

TIO

N T

O E

XIST

ING

GRO

UN

D ST

ORA

GE T

ANK

LAT:

N29

.163

85LO

NG:

W97

.093

74

OLD

CU

ERO

RD

LOOP 51

TRC

EN

GIN

EER

S, IN

C.

EXH

IBIT

2C

ITY

OF

YO

AK

UM

, TEX

AS

GLO

MIT

GR

AN

T A

PPLI

CA

TIO

NW

ATE

R S

YST

EM IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

PRO

POSE

D W

ATE

R W

ELL

YO

AK

UM

C

IT

Y LIM

IT

S

PR

OP

OS

ED

W

AT

ER

W

ELL

PR

OP

OS

ED

12" T

RA

NS

FE

R P

IP

ELIN

E

LE

GE

ND

CO

UN

TY

LIN

E

AutoCAD SHX Text
\\AUSTIN-FP1\INFRASTRUCTURE\WORK IN PROGRESS\YOAKUM\XXXXXX GLO MIT GRANT APPLICATION (2020)\EXHIBIT\11X17 GRANT EXHIBITS\WATER EXHIBIT 2 PROPOSED WATER WELL.DWG - 9/9/20 - 9/9/209/9/20
AutoCAD SHX Text
505 E. HUNTLAND DRIVE, STE. 250 AUSTIN, TX 78752
AutoCAD SHX Text
T.B.P.E. FIRM REGISTRATION # F-8632
AutoCAD SHX Text
(512) 454 - 8716
AutoCAD SHX Text
0
AutoCAD SHX Text
1000
AutoCAD SHX Text
250
AutoCAD SHX Text
500
AutoCAD SHX Text
500
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE : 1" = 500'
Page 8: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

LAT:

N29

.173

22LO

NG:

W97

.085

84PR

OPO

SED

8" W

ATER

PIP

ELIN

E

PRO

POSE

D 50

0,00

0GA

L EL

EVAT

ED T

ANK

(REM

OVE

EXI

STIN

G25

0,00

0 GA

LEL

EVAT

ED T

ANK)

FOREST

IRVINE

LOTT

FRONT

LOTT

IRVINE

FOREST

McCARTY

DUNN

SIMPSO

N

EDGAR

BARE

HAGAN

MATHEW

ELK

CAPITOL

CARRUTH

TRIBBLE

OAK RIDGE

MONTGOMERY

JOHNSTON HILL

RANNEY

DAVIS

N. S

OU

TH

DAVIS

WILLIS

ROSE

LESTER

KENEDY

DUKE

ORANGESCHRIMSHER

VICTORIA

HUBBARD

KENEDY

S.SOUTH

WEST

HUTCHISON

ARNOLD

PATTONCRITTENDEN

JAMES

CLARK

THIRD

SECOND

FIRST

DALLAS

HOUSTON

PORTER

WACO

AUSTIN

HAMIL

PERRY

ORTHCRISS

WELL

PRICE

COKE

WHITFIE

LD

EAST GONZA

LES

E. MAY

E. HUGO

E. MORRIS

NELSON

HOPKINS

W. MAY

W. GRAND

W. HUGO

W. MORRIS

W. HOCHHEIM

E. GRAND

E. HUGO

E. MORRIS

CRISSW

ELL

TRC

EN

GIN

EER

S, IN

C.

EXH

IBIT

3C

ITY

OF

YO

AK

UM

, TEX

AS

GLO

MIT

GR

AN

T A

PPLI

CA

TIO

NW

ATE

R S

YST

EM IM

PRO

VEM

ENTS

ELEV

ATE

D T

AN

K &

WA

TER

MA

IN

LE

GE

ND

PR

OP

OS

ED

8" W

AT

ER

P

IP

ELIN

E

CO

UN

TY

LIN

E

WA

TE

R V

ALV

E

FIR

E H

YD

RA

NT

PR

OP

OS

ED

500,000 G

AL T

AN

K

YO

AK

UM

C

IT

Y LIM

IT

S

AutoCAD SHX Text
\\AUSTIN-FP1\INFRASTRUCTURE\WORK IN PROGRESS\YOAKUM\XXXXXX GLO MIT GRANT APPLICATION (2020)\EXHIBIT\11X17 GRANT EXHIBITS\WATER EXHIBIT 3 ELEVATED TANK & WATERMAIN.DWG - 9/9/20 - 9/9/209/9/20
AutoCAD SHX Text
505 E. HUNTLAND DRIVE, STE. 250 AUSTIN, TX 78752
AutoCAD SHX Text
T.B.P.E. FIRM REGISTRATION # F-8632
AutoCAD SHX Text
(512) 454 - 8716
AutoCAD SHX Text
0
AutoCAD SHX Text
1000
AutoCAD SHX Text
250
AutoCAD SHX Text
500
AutoCAD SHX Text
500
AutoCAD SHX Text
SCALE : 1" = 500'
Page 9: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

For purposes of Mitigation application and implementation, the Project provided represents the overall Mitigation need being met.

Mitigation Need Identification Description

Hazard, Risk Description ‐ Describe how the risk(s) selected (Flooding, 

Hurricanes/Tropical Storms) are impacting the proposed project area. 

Reference where adopted local mitigation efforts are planned or 

underway where appropriate.

Portions of the City’s potable water system has outlived its useful life, with 

water mains and other facilities dating back to the early 1900’s.  The proposed 

project would address these facilities including replacement of the existing 

Yoakum Elevated Water Storage Tank that was constructed in 1931, 

replacement of water mains that date back to the early 1900’s, and 

replacement of a water well.  

Hazard Mitigation Actions ‐ Describe how the proposed project will 

mitigate against the identified lists.  Reference where adopted local 

mitigation efforts are being enhanced where appropriate.

If constructed, these new facilities would enhance the City’s water supply, 

storage, flow and pressure by providing increased elevated storage capacity, 

increased water transportation by replacing very old mains that have reduced 

flow/pressure due to pipe tuberculation, increased water production by the 

construction of a new well, and minimize future maintenance needs.

Elevated Storage Tank Replcement

The proposed elevated storage tank will have a capacity of 500,000 gallons 

and be located adjacent to the existing tank.  When the new tank is complete, 

the proposed water mains will be routed to feed into the new tank and the 

existing tank will be demolished, removed from the site and properly disposed 

of.  The City will be required to purchase approximately one (1) acre for the 

new tank site, which will be contiguous with the existing site. 

Water Main Replacement

As shown on the project map, an 8” water main extends South from the 

Yoakum Elevated Tank to the railroad, crosses under the railroad on 

Waco/Price streets and terminates at the intersection of Price and Shrimsher 

Streets.  The existing main is constructed of asbestos/cement (constructed in 

1950’s‐1960’s) and cast iron (constructed in early 1900’s), and thus has far 

outlived its anticipated useful life.  

The age of the existing system is causing excessive leaks that could equate to 

low pressure within the system.  Undoubtedly, there is significant calcification 

and tuberculation (rust deposits in the cast iron pipe) that can cause restricted 

flow and pressure.  The proposed project would alleviate these issues.  

Page 10: CDBG‐MIT: Budget Justification of Retail Costs

Provide a Project Summary:Summary must identify each Activity and Site required for successful 

mitigation, and identify the risk being mitigated. 

Proposed Water Well Project

 This project consists of the construction of a new well in the same vicinity as the 

Brushy Creek water Well to work in conjunction to provide increased water production 

capacity.  The proposed well would have an estimated capacity of 1,000 gallons/minute 

(GPM), equating to a system‐wide capacity increase of ____ percent.  The proposed 

well would be located approximately 500 feet from the Brushy Creek Plant ground 

storage tank.  The well would discharge into the storage tank through a 12” diameter 

transfer pipeline.

Elevated Storage Tank Replacement

1. The existing tank exterior paint coating contains lead paint that has been 

encapsulated with multiple coatings.  The new tank will not have lead paint and the 

existing tank will be removed from the site in a manner to prevent lead deposits onto 

the ground.

2. The proposed tank will be of the “composite” design, which consists of a single 

concrete column (as opposed to multiple legs) that supports the steel tank bowl.  This 

style of tank minimizes the amount of surface area required for future painting and 

reduces the risk of paint overspray onto adjacent properties. 

3. The increase of tank capacity, from 250,000 gallons to 500,000 gallons, will provide 

the City with enhance fire flow protection by increasing the available elevated storage 

volume, estimated at 3.5 additional hours of fire flow capacity.

4. Because the existing tank has multiple legs, there are numerous horizontal steel 

members or struts needed for the stabilization of the legs.  The City has had issues with 

large birds roosting on the support members to extended periods, causing 

environmental concerns.  The composite design will not require horizontal supports, 

thus this issue will be alleviated with the construction on the new tank.

Water Main Replacement

Construction would consist of direct burial of the pipeline with the exception of that 

portion that crosses the Union Pacific Railroad (UPRR), which will require boring (jack 

and bore) under the railroad right‐of‐way with a steel encasement pipe and insertion of 

the PVC main within the casing pipe.  Acquisition of a permit from UPRR will be 

required.  Improvements for the water main would include related facilities such as fire 

hydrants, customer service connections and in‐line isolation valves.  

Is proposed project in Local plan?  If it is, provide a copy and it must include page number of proposed project, 

month/year was adopted, council/commissioner's court adoption in minutes.  

Will need to upload.