cdd ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2d qftigst17/slides/tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2...

24
CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFT deformations of 2D QFT Tateo Roberto Based on: M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi, JHEP [arXiv:1305.1278] A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. Szécsényi, JHEP [arXiv:1608.05534] Torino IGST2017, Paris

Upload: others

Post on 30-Jul-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

CDD ambiguity and irrelevant CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTdeformations of 2D QFT

Tateo RobertoBased on:

M. Caselle, D. Fioravanti, F. Gliozzi, JHEP [arXiv:1305.1278] A. Cavaglià, S. Negro, I. Szécsényi, JHEP [arXiv:1608.05534]

Torino

IGST2017, Paris

Page 2: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

2

Other relevant referencesA.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT in two-dimensional quantum field theory, [hep-th/0401146];

S. Dubovsky, R. Flauger and V. Gorbenko, Solving the simplest theory of quantum gravity, JHEP 2012 (2012);

S. Dubovsky, V. Gorbenko and M. Mirbabayi, Natural tuning: towards a proof of concept, [hep-th/1305.6939];

F. A. Smirnov and A. B. Zamolodchikov, On space of integrable quantum field theories, Nucl.Phys. B915 (2017),[hep-th/1608.05499];

L. McGough, M. Mezei, H. Verlinde, Moving the CFT into the bulk with TT, [hep-th/1611.03470];

A. Giveon, N. Itzhaki, D. Kutasov, TT and LST, [hep- th/1701.05576];

Page 3: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

3

Main motivationsThe effective string theory for the quark-antiquark potential;

Emergence of singularities in RG/TBA flows with irrelevant perturbations;

Relation between irrelevant perturbations and S-matrix CDD (scalar phase factor) ambiguity;

AdS3/CFT

2 duality;

CFTUV

CFTIR

CFTIR

?

Page 4: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

4

Exact S-matrix and CDD ambiguity

Consider a relativistic integrable field theory with factorised scattering:

The simplest possibility, consistent with the crossing and unitarity relations is:

Castillejo-Dalitz-Dyson ambiguity:

Page 5: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

5

The sine-Gordon NLIE

The finite-size properties of the sine-Gordon model are encoded in the single counting function f(θ), solution to the following nonlinear integral equation:

For the ground state and , but more more complicatedcontours appear for excited states.

and

[A. Klumper, M. T. Batchelor and P. A. Pearce; C. Destri, H. DeVega]

Page 6: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

6

Zero-momentum case:

which allows to compute the exact form of the t-deformed energy level once its R-dependence is known at t = 0.

replacing

we get

with

Page 7: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

7

The latter equation is the implicit form of a solution of a well-known hydrodynamic equation,the invicid Burgers equation:

the deformation parameter t plays the role of “time” variable, and the undeformed energy level serves as initial condition at t = 0. For the general case:

with

Then

and

,

Page 8: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

8

we now have an implicit form of the solution of the inviscid Burgers equation with a source term:

again the undeformed energy E(R,0) plays the role of initial condition at t = 0.

source term

Page 9: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

9

Shock singularitiesTo see the emergence of the wave-breaking phenomenon in the inviscid Burgers equation, let’s consider the P = 0 case. For a generic initial condition, E(R,0):

with

the map

has in general a number of square-root branch points in the complex R-plane. To find their location, consider the inverse map:

Then, a singularity is characterised by the condition

Indeed, around a solution of this equation, we have:

for

,

.

Page 10: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

10

In typical hydrodynamic applications, the initial profile is smooth on the real-R axis, and for short times all branch points lie in the complex plane.

The time evolution however in general brings one of the singularities on the real domain in a finite time, producing a shock in the physical solution.

Therefore:

and

Page 11: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

11

Typical t=0 finite-volume spectrum:

R

E(R)

Page 12: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

12

The energy levels display a pole at R = 0:

where, ceff

= c – 24Δ is the “effective central charge” of the UV CFT state.

This behaviour implies that, for small times t > 0, the equation

has two solutions very close to

and correspondingly the solution is singular at

In other words, as soon as t > 0, the pole at R = 0 resolves into a pair of branch points.

Page 13: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

13

Real part of E(R, t) for t = 0 (dashed line) and t = 0.025 (solid line), for c

eff = 1

Real part of E(R, t) for t = 0 (dashed line) andt = 0.025 (solid line), for c

eff = −1

Page 14: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

14

An extra CDD factor couples left (-) with right (+) movers scattering, any NLIE or TBA equation leads to a pair of coupled algebraic equations:

ceff

= c – 24 Δ(primary), obtained by an energy-dependent shift:

which matches the form of the (D=26, cef=24) Nambu Goto spectrum, for generic

CFT, with t=1/(2, where is the string tension.

The CFT case

The total energy:

.

Page 15: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

15

SU(2) at β = 16. Solid curves are continuum NG; dashed curves are NG with a ‘lattice’ dispersion relation. Thick vertical line is deconfining transition; thin vertical line is NG tachyonic transition.

Best figure from:

A. Athenodoroua and M. TeperarXiv:1602.07634

Page 16: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

16

Identification of the perturbing operator

Start from the equation

and use the standard relations

then

with

Page 17: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

17

Use Zamolodchikov's definition for the composite operator:

which fulfils the following factorization property:

Proof:

Consider that together with the conservation laws:

keeping z and z’ separated:

Page 18: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

18

Therefore, up to total derivatives:

Putting all this information together:

and

then

and sending we get the desired factorisation result.

which generalises the near CFT perturbative result:

Page 19: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

19

Classical Action: one bosonic field

Starting from:

Page 20: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

20

Nambu Goto action in 3D target space:

and

with

in the static gauge:

N free massless boson →Nambu Goto in (N+2) taget space:

Page 21: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

21

The Lagrangian is very complicated, but we already know that its quantum spectrum is:

Single boson field with generic potential

Page 22: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

22

Generalisations

Many known scattering models differ only by CDD factors

CDD factors admit an expansion in terms of the spin of the local integrals of motion:

with

Thermally perturbed Ising model (c=1/2) Sinh-Gordon (c=1)

ADE minimal Scattering models Simply-Laced Affine Toda models

Page 23: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

23

F. Smirnov, A. Zamolodchikov: adding CDD factors leads to well-identified effective field theories. The corresponding perturbing fields are the composite operators:

Generalised Burgers equation

(i.e. a Generalized Gibbs ensemble )

Page 24: CDD ambiguity and irrelevant deformations of 2D QFTigst17/slides/Tateo.pdf · 2017-07-17 · 2 Other relevant references A.B. Zamolodchikov, Expectation value of composite field TT

24

Conclusions● Adding CDD factors generates interesting, often UV incomplete, QFTs.

● While the study of generic irrelevant perturbations in QFT remains very problematic, the perturbation appears to be surprisingly easy to treat also in non-integrable models.

● The research on this topic may clarify important aspects concerning the appearance of singularities in efective QFT (Landau pole and tachyon singularity).

● It may be useful in the efective string framework since contributions from higher-dimension integrable composite operators can be added (Virasoro, W-algebra ...).

● It may help to understand the origin of massive modes propagating on the flux tube.