cedar secondary play fields - remediation reality
TRANSCRIPT
Addendum A
A Lewkowlch Eng i neer! ng_ Aggociates Ltd.& environmental' materials testing
School District #68c/o Newcasde Engineedng Ltd.4 - 3179 Barons RoadNanaimo, BCv9T 5W5
Date: March5,201'3File Number P1,422"01.
1.
Attention: Mr. Scott Lewis, P.Eng.
PROJECT: CEDAR COMMUNITY SECONDARY SCHOOL - PI-AYING FIELD1640 MACMILLAN ROAD, NANATMO, BC
SUBJECT: PROPOSAI FEES FOR GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION SERVICES
Dear Mr. Ler.vis:
Inttoduction
Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. is pleased to provide this proposal of costs to
undertake a geotechnical investigation for the referenced site with respect to the proposed
playing f,reld improvements. The scope of our work and associated costs are oudined beiow,
and are based on prelimin ary infor:.rration ptovided by Newcasde Engineering Ltd.
Scope of Work
riTe understand the project consists of irnprovements to the existing playi-ng fie1ds to
irnprove drainage conditions.
Based on the information ptovided, we propose to advance a number of subsurface
explorations by means of a series of bore holes that would ptovide good general coverage of
the proposed improvem ent area (piaying f,relds). These subsurface explorations would be
advanced as deep as deemed necessary to provide information regarding the suitability of
subgrade soil conditions, depth to bedrock (if possible), settlemeot potential, seisrrric
considerations, the depth of the current water table (if possible), and well as the depth,
composition, and consistency of any f,ll materials, and comments on the suitability of said
fiIl materials for reuse as engineered fill.
'W'e recomrnend a drilling proglam in lieu of conventional test pitting. The excavation
equipment required to reach the depths typical of this type of investigation is large and
2.
a.
b.
SuiteA-2569 Kenworthr Road, Nanaimo, BC, CanadaVgT3M4fercphone: iZSOi 7S&O355 Fax: (250) 75&3831 www.lewkowich.co:n€--
client: School District #68 clo Newcastle Engineering Ltd.
Project: Cedar Communiw Secondary School - Playing pit16
File: PL422"01.
Date: March 5,201.3
Page: 2 of 4
extremely invasive. Test pits would result in large "soft" or disturbed areas within the
existing playing field. These areas would then require remediation at the time of
construcdon, increasing construction costs. lUso, the distutbed areas would tequire
remediation immediately followiog the field investigation which rvould increase the cost of
our investigation. Test pitting would result in signifi-cant sufface scarring and is not
recomrnended.
d. Senior field personnei would log the subsurface explorations using visual classification
methods. Following completion of the field investigation, a moderate amouflt of laboratory
testing for classification confrmation will be carried out, the scope of which is dependent on
the encountered conditions. \7e would then prepare a report that includes information as
outlined above, as well as soil logs detailing the subsurface conditiofls encountered.
e. LEA is prepared to complete this assignment in 3 to 5 weeks from notice to proceed; if a
specific timeline is required please speci$r. Please note, the quoted schedule is subject to the
availability of subcontractors.
f. The following quote is based on reasonable site access. If services quoted below are deemed
unrrecessary, or if unan1icipated services are tequired, costs wili be adiusted accordingly using
the attached schedule of fees.
A
Lew*towi e!: Eng i neeri ng Assoq Late?-Lt9!:
--
AClient:Project:File:Date:Page:
School District #68 clo New-castle Engineering Ltd'
Cedar Community Secondary School - Plaving Field
P1,422.01
N{arch 5,20133of4
Total CostTotal Hours/Units
$10,185.00Totai Proposal Costs (liot Including Taxes)
Senior Technician
/ TechnologistProject Start-uP & FieldReconnaissance
Drilling ContractorDrilling - FieldInvestigation
Senior Technician
/ TechnologistDrilhng - Fieldlnvestigation
DraftingTechnician
Soil Logs/Site Plan
Drafting
Senior Technician/ Techoologist
Geotechnical RePortPreparation
Geotechnical RePort
Review/Discussions
LaboratoryTechnician
Laboraton Soils
Analysis
ffisdonotinc1udethe1ocatingofonsiteundergroundser-vices/uti1itieswithintheworkarea (playing f,eld). If it o a.i"r-irr.a that locating th"e o., site utjliries ii r;ltit;,a, a lump sum fee of $500 for an
i,rd.plrra.rr.,.tjlity locating contractor wili be added to the above proposal costs'
xleetings and discussions for design and construction -*,'ould be extra at an hourlv rate shorvn on appended
schedule of fees.
Breakdown of Geotechnical Evaluation Costs
Key Personnel and Related Experience
The Project Manager for this project would be Mr. Steven Stacey, B'A', CTech, who has
ovef six years of expeliefice in the heids of civil and geotechnical engineering' The Engineer
for this assignment would be Mr. Chris Hudec, N{'A'Sc', P'E'ng' who has over ten years of
experience in rhe fleld oIgeotechnical engineering'
TEA has selved the Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands afea since 1'994 and has completed
or is currently involved with similar projects on Vaflcouver Island' including:
\IIj
I\+/i
3.
b.
Lewkowictr Engineering Assoeiates Ltd'
Client:Project:File:Date:Page:
School Disuict #68 c/o Newcasde Engineering Ltd'Cedar Community Secondary Schooi - Playing Field
P1.422.01
l\{arch 5,20134of4
4.
Merle Logan Artificial Playing Fields - Nanaimo, 2005 & 201'1'
Ladysmith Artificiai Plapng Field - Ladysmith,2010
Duncan Sports Field - Duncan, 2010
Comox Park Sports Field - Nanaimo,2010
Alberni District Secondary School - Port Albemi, 2009 to 2011
Valley Vierv Soccer Fields - Courtenay '2011
Fernwood School Playing Field - Saltspring Island, 2011
Closure
Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. appreciates the opportuoity to be of service on this
project. If you have any cornments, or if we can be of lurther assistance, please contact this
office at your convenience'
Respectfullv Submitted,Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.
Steven Stacey, B.A., CTechTechnician
tewkowlch Eng i neering Associate-s Llll -
-
+';.ia:=':i:=..:.::. :.=: ..:
:;: .\: :
'',=.8.,.'
-*a a'.
":! ra-i;,'+ '''' '
**
2013 Fees Schedule A
Description
PERSONNEL
Gerry F. Lewkowich, P'Eng.
Darron Clark, P.Eng.
Christopher Hudec, M'A.Sc., P'Eng
Paul Johnston, RIHT, lndustrial Hygienist
John Hessels, ASoT, Senior Technologist
Junior ProfessionalSenior TechnicianTechnicianJunior TechnicianSet of Building Schedules B and C
Overtime rates for hourly work may apply'
TESTING
Density Testing (nuclear densometer or volumetric)
Soil Moisture ContentSoil Classification and Description
Wash Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)
Dry Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)
Fines Content DeterminationAtterberg Limits (Plastic and Liquid)
HydrometerMoistu re-Density Relationshi p (Mod ified Proctor)
Moistu re-Density Relatlonshi p (Standard Proctor)
Concrete Testing (On Site: Air, Slump, Cylinders)
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders (Client cast
or Lewkowich cast) or flexural strength of beams
Asphalt Testing (to include):- Oilextraction & Gradation- Brrquette DensitY- Marshall stabilitY and flow
- Void AnalYsis
Complete Marshall test including above
Asphalt / Concrete Coring - Calculate as follows:
(100mm dia X 50mm depth = 5000 coring mm) -
plus hourlY coring rate
Asphalt Core DensitiesOther tests (not listed) are performed at hourly rates'
DTSBURSEMENTS
Vehicle Kilometerage
(Note: Vehicle kilometerage rate is subject to change as
fuel costs vary)
All other disbursements at cost plus 10%
Prices are subiect to change without notice'
Rate Per ASTM Test Method
i 't',.1"1
It., ,!ti
rfi.
..y'') , "/.t ,l I
'.l*.l
- il' ! ". I- Y' v" i ,r-v|
l-,)- " i-.'l^'t.JI TL
1r" . L'" ,
nlt'
D2216
c1361C117c136c117
D431 8
D422D1557D698
CSA - p23.2
CSA - M3-2
D2172 I D5444D2726D1559D3203
D2726
Suite A, 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, B C VgT 3M4
Ph. 250-756-0355, F ax 250-7 56-3831
# 4 - 3179 BARONS ROAD, NANAIMO, B.C. VgT 5W5
PHONE: (250) 756-9553 FAX: (250) 756-9503
NEWCASTLEENGINEERING LTD.
s066-39CorresPondence
March 6,2013
School District 68 (Nanaimo - Ladysmith)
395 Wakesiah AvenueNanaimo, 8.C., VgR 3K6
Attention: Mr' Brent SPohn
Re: Cedar Secondary SchoolPlay Field Drainage Report - Fee Proposal
Dear Brent,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide a fee propog?llq the Topographic survey,
Preliminary Design and CosiEstimate for the playfield drainage problem at Cedar
Secondary School.
Our fee proposal is based telephone discussions with yourself and Steve Stacey of
Lewkowich fngineeiing Assoclates Ltd., on March 1,2013. We have separated the fee
pi"p"rrl into vlrious p-hr*"= of the project and identified our understanding of the scope
of work in each area.
A) Topographic SurveY
. Topographic Survey in area of existing piay fieid'
. Layout andlor pick up test hole locations.
. Download survey data and import into civil site plan'
e Obtain existing digitalfile of Cedar Secondary Schoolfrom School Disirict if available
. Update digital base Plan'
Part A Lump Sum $2,300.00
B) Preliminary Design OPtions
I Liaison with Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd, in regards to proposed test hole
investigation.
. Review Geotechnical Report provided by Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd'
. prepare preliminary design to eliminate field drainage problem.
. Forward options to School District.
. Attendance at meeting with school District staff to review design'
. Address School District comments'
Part B LumP Sum $3,500.00
C) Preliminary Cost Estimate
r prepare preliminary Cost Estimate for drainage works to School District for review'
r Address any inquires in regards to cost estimates'
Part G Lump Sum $1,000.00
D) Geotechnical lnvestigation and Report
. Attached is proposal Fees for Geotechnical Evaluation Services prepared by
Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.
Part D Estimated Fee ${0,185.00
Note, additional $500.00 for utility locate if required. Meetings and discussions for design
and construction would be extra at hourly rate'
Summary of our fee for the project is as follows:
Part A $2,300.00Part B $3,500.00Part C 1,000.00
Part D (Estimated Feil $'10,185.00
Project Total $16,985.00
Our Total Estimated Fee for the project is 16,985.00 plus HST'
lf you have any questions, or require any further information, please contract the
undersigned.
Yours truly,Newcastle Engineering Ltd'tu'Scott Lewis, P. Eng.
Addendum B
Donna Reimer
From:Subject:Attachments:
lmportance:
BS-05
Discovery Search MailboxFW: Cedar Secondary Site Drainage Assessment - Please proceed
P1422.0L Cedar Community Secondary School - Playing Field - Geotechnical....pdf; SD
68 Brent Spohn Cedar Secondary Fee Proposal March 6 20l3.pdf
High
From: Brent SpohnSent: Monday, January L3,20L4 1:00 PM
To: 'Scott Lewis'Cc: 'Bassem Tawfik ([email protected])'; 'D. Gregg Brown (qbrown@kmbr'com)'; Pete Sabo
Subject: Cedar Secondary Site Drainage Assessment - Please proceed
Impoftance: High
HiScott,
As discussed during our teleconference minutes ago please proceed immediatelv per the attached.
Timelines are extremely tight. Please obtain an accelerated schedule from Lewkowich, develop the same for NEL and
forward as soon as possible.
It is critical that the District have sufficient information to allow the cost consultant to develop initial high level costing in
support of the budgeting process currently underway.
Please don't hesitate to contact me if you have any questions or concerns.
*r**t *"*+i:* i Fe*iliii*e Fi:+::!n; 5*p*:-';i=+r
=:r*-ii :5=-7+1-12i: i F=r ?5*-?4i"5?+: i **ri?C*-?'.3-i411
-1** V';*i.e*ia=.Ai,*r;i:+, il;nai..n=. =e -\.r:ifr 35i i ';'.+:;.s=.4S.*':,ca
A Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.geotechnical . health, safety & environmental'materials testing
Date: March5,2013File Number P1422.01
School District #68c/o Newcasde Engineering Ltd.4 - 31.79 Barons RoadNanaimo, BCv9T 5\75
2-
Attention: Mr. Scott Lewis, P.Eng.
PROJECT: CEDAR COMMUNITY SECONDARY SCHOOL - PI-AYING FIELD1640 MACMILLAN ROAD, NANAIMO, BC
SUBJECT: PROPOSAL FEES FOR GEOTECHNICAL EVALUATION SERYICES
Dear Mr. Lewis:
a.
b.
Introduction
Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. is pleased to provide this proposal of costs to
undertake a geotechnical investigation for the referenced site with respect to the proposed
playing field improvements. The scope of our work and associated costs are outlined beIow,
and are based on preLrminary information provided by Newcasde Engineering Ltd.
Scope of Work
We understand the project consists of improvements to the existing piaying fie1ds to
improve drainage conditions.
Based on the information provided, we propose to advance a number of subsurface
explorations by means of a series of bore holes that would provide good general coverage of
the proposed improvemeflt ^rea
(playing fields). These subsurface exploradons would be
advanced as deep as deemed necessarT to provide information regarding the suitabiiity of
subgrade soil conditions, depth to bedrock (if possible), setdement potefldal, seismic
considerations, the depth of the current water table (if possible), and well as the depth,
composition, and consistency of any fill materials, and comrnents on the suitabiliry of said
ftlI materials for reuse as engineered fili.
We recommend a drilling program in iieu of conventional test pitting. The excavation
equipment required to reach the depths typical of this type of investigation is large and
Suite A - 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, BC, Canada VgT 3M4Telephone: (250) 75effi55 Fax (250) 756.3831 www.lewkowich.com
C.
Client:Project:File:Date:Page:
School District #68 c/o Newcastle Engineering Ltd.Cedar Communitv Secondary School - Playing FieidP1,422.07
March 5,20L32of4
extremely invasive. Test pits would result in large "soft" or disturbed areas within the
existing playing fieid. These areas would then require remediation at the time of
construction, increasing construction costs. Also, the distutbed areas would require
remediation immediately following the field invesdgation rvhich rvould increase the cost of
our investigation. Test pitting would result in significant surface scardng and is not
tecommended.
Senior field personnei would log the subsutface exploratiofls using visual classification
methods. Foliowing completion of the field investigation, a moderate amouflt of laboratory
testing for classification conft'mation will be carried out, the scope of which is dependent ofl
the encountered condidons. 'We would then prepare a report that includes ioformation as
outlined above, as well as soil logs detailing the subsutface conditions encountered.
LEA is prepared to complete this assignment in 3 to 5 weeks from notice to proceed; if a
specific timeline is required please specifir. Please riote, the quoted schedule is subject to the
availability of subcontractors.
The foilowing quote is based on reasonable site access. If services quoted below are deemed
unnecessary, or if unanticipated services are required, costs wil-l be adjusted accordingly using
the attached schedule of fees.
d.
e"
f.
Lewkowieh Engineerift g Associates Ltd.
Client:Project:File:Date:Page:
School District #68 clo Newcasde Engineering Ltd'Cedar Communiq, Secondary School - Plaving Field
P1.422.07
I\{arch 5,201.3
3of4
A
Total CostPersonnel
l*
[l,1' ;
Total Proposal Costs (llot Including Taxes) $10,18s.00
Project Start-up & FieldReconnaissance
Senior T'echoician
/ Technoiogist
Drilling Contractor
Senior Technician/ Technologist
Drilling - FieldInvestigation
DraftingTechnician
Soil Logs/Site PlanDrafting
Senior Technician
/ TechnologistGeotechnical ReportPreparation
Geotechnical ReportReview/Discussions
Laboraton'Technician
Laboratorr, SoilsAnalysis
Please nore, the above fees do not include the locating of on site underground services/utilities within the work
area (pla1.ing fie]d). If it is determined that locating the on site utilities is required, a lump sum lee of $500 for an
independent utiliry locating cofltractor wili be added to the above Pfoposal costs.
Nleetings and discussions for design and construction w-ould be extra at an houdv rate shown on appended
schedule of fees.
3.
Breakdown of Geotechnical Evaluation Costs
Key Personnel and Related Experience
The Project Manager for this project would be N{r. Steven Stace.Y, B.A', CTech, who has
o1.er six years of expelience rn the helds of civil and geotechnical engineering. The Engineer
for this assignmenr would be N{r. Chris Hudec, M.A.Sc., P.Eng. rvho has over terl l'ears of
experience in rhe Ileld oIgeolechnical engineering.
LEA has served the Vancouver Island and Gulf Islands area since 1994 and has completed
or is currenth, inr.'olved with similar pro]ects on Vancouver Islaad, including:
Lewkowi ch Eng i neerin g 4ssgg iates L-19.
----_
1-
Client:Project:File:Date:Page:
School District #68 c/o Newcastle Engineeling Ltd.Cedar Community Secondary School - Playing FieldP1,422.01
March 5,201.34of4
A
v.
vi.
vii.
i. Merle Logan Artificial Playing Fields - Nanaimo, 2005 & 2011,
ii. Ladysmith Artificial Plapng Field - Ladysmith,2010
in" Duncan Sports Field - Duncan, 2010
iv. Comox Park Sports Field - Nanaimo, 2010
Alberni District Secondary School * Port Alberni, 2009 to 2011
VaJley Vierr,' Soccer Fields - Courtenay,2011
Fernwood School Playing Field - Saltspring Islaad, 2011
Closure
Lewkowrch Engineering Associates Ltd. appreciates the oppoffunity to be of service ori this
project" If you have any comments, or if we can be of further assistance, please contact this
office at your convenience.
Respectlullv Submitted,Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.
4.
_o+F-****.1!nrrG+sg3*"=*
-----
,;Ei-sffi&-ryg.#fffiir@_iElb*p'." 'S;r'&-!- -r H tt.?*.+*f,Elri;hr'
*t**5-1-*'Steven Stacey, B.A., CTechTechnician
Lewkowleh Engineering Associates !-td.
:= l,:-:1.,:.,=- --' lE!:. :'i<:-=a,j.::a.::;=a::.;':,..;a!-;:::,r:
:E;,-,
ffi:,.9
' : =l:ii
; e.
,l=-::i;' :: ' '::i iaii':::i,ai:j:l ::. .
::;=:: ::r:-::i : li;
€r.€
iEH,s1*
'g}!i;6,4 ::.;lp-!.ii+t;i.. :
,-lr,
&'rlw:=:..::a:=
'..
1-q
*E--
ZAfi Fees Schedule A
Description
PERSONNEL
Gerry F. Lewkowich, P.Eng.
Darron Clark, P.Eng.Christopher Hudec, M.A.Sc., P.Eng
Paul Johnston, RIHT, lndustrial Hygienist
John Hessels, AScT, Senior Technologist
Junior ProfessionalSenior TechnicianTechnicianJunior TechnicianSet of Building Schedules B and COvertime rates for hourly work may apply.
TESTING
Density Testing (nuclear densometer or volumetric)
Soil Morsture ContentSoil Classification and DescriptionWash Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)
Dry Sieve Analysis (aggregate gradation)
Fines Content DeterminationAtterberg Limits (Plastic and Liquid)
HydrometerMoisture-Density Relationship (Modified Froctor)
Moistu re-Density Relationsh ip (Standard Proctor)Concrete Testing (On Site: Air, Slump, Cylinders)
Compressive Strength of Concrete Cylinders (Client cast
or Lewkowich cast) or flexural strength of beams
Asphalt Testing (to include):- Oilextraction & Gradation- Briquette Density- Marshall stability and flow- Void Analysis
Complete Marshall test including above
Asphalt / Concrete Coring - Calculate as follows:(100mm dia X 50mm depth = 5000 coring mm) -plus hourly coring rateAsphalt Core DensitiesOther iests (not listed) are performed at hourly rates
DISBURSEMENTS
Vehicle Kilometerage
(Note: Vehicle kilomeierage rate is subject to change as
fuel costs vary)
All other disbursements at cost plus 10%
Prices are subject to change without notice.
D2726
Suite A, 2569 Kenworth Road, Nanaimo, B.C' VgT 3M4
Ph. 250-756-0355, F ax. 250-7 56-3831
Rate Per ASTM Test Method
, ,1.
l;
,. rltl.rlt',
.l' ,\'. !l- ,,!
.,,y*' " !ii'. nj
'''' l:-Li , *t''- Yl,,!.
i, tL __.I'+ " L't- \"/
L'
D2216
c136 tC117c136c117
D431 8
D422D1557D698
CSA - 423.2
CSA - 423.2
D2172 I D5444D2726D1 559D3203
# 4 - 3179 BARONS ROAD, NANAIMO, B.C. VgT 5W5
PHoNE: (250) 756-9553 FAX: (250) 756-9503
NEWCASTLEENGINEERING LTD.
s066-39CorresPondence
March 6,2013
School District 68 (Nanaimo - Ladysmith)395 Wakesiah AvenueNanaimo, 8"C., VgR 3K6
Attention: Mr. Brent SPohn
Re: CedarSecondarySchoolPlay Field Drainage Report * Fee Proposal
Dear Brent,
Thank you for the opportunity to provide a fee proposal for the Topographic Survey,preliminary Design and Cost Estimate for the playfield drainage problem at Cedar
Secondary School.
Our fee proposal is based telephone discussions with yourself and Steve Stacey ofLewkowich Engineering Assoeiates Ltd., on March 1,2013. We have separated the fee
proposal into various phases of the project and identified our understanding of the scope
of work in each area.
A) Topographic SurveY
. Topographic Survey in area of existing ptay fieid.
. Layout and/or pick up test hole locations.
o Download survey data and import into civil site plan'
o Obtain existing digital file of Cedar Secondary School from School District if available
. Update digital base plan.
Part A Lump Sum
B) Preliminary Design OPtions
$2,300.00
. Liaison with Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd. in regards to proposed test hole
investigation.
. Review Geotechnical Report provided by Lewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.
. Prepare preliminary design to eliminate field drainage problem.
. Forward options to School District.
. Attendance at meeting with School District Staff to review design.
. Address School District comments.
Part B Lump Sum $3,500.00
C) Preliminary Cost Estimate
. Prepare Preliminary Cost Estimate for drainage works to School District for review.
. Address any inquires in regards to cost estimates.
Part C Lump Sum $1,000.00
D) Geotechnical lnvestigation and Report
. Attached is Proposal Fees for Geotechnical Evaluation Services prepared byLewkowich Engineering Associates Ltd.
Part D Estimated Fee $10,185.00
Note, additional $500.00 for utility locate if required. Meetings and discussions for designand construction would be extra at hourly rate.
Summary of our fee for the project is as follows:
Pari A $2,300.00Part B $3,500.00Part C 1,000.00Part D (Estimated Fee) $10,185.00
Project Total $16,985.00
Our Total Estimated Fee for the project is 16,985.00 plus HST.
lf you have any questions, or require any fudher information, please contract theundersigned,
Yours truly,Newcastle Engineering Ltd.tu'Scott Lewis, P. Eng.
Addendum C
Donna Reimer
From:Subject:Attachments:
85.27
Discovery Search MailboxFW: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE
CEDAR SECONDARY FRENCH DRAIN SYSTEM Feb 21 2Al4.pdf; CEDAR SECONDARY
SCHOOL FIELD LAYOUT Feb 21 2O74.pdf; Cedar Secondary Preliminary Cost Estimate
February 19 2014.pdf; F1315.02 Cedar Secondary School - Playing Field - GeotechnicalReport.pdf
From: Brent SpohnSent: Friday, February 2L,2A14 3:21 PM
To: 'Bassem Tawfik ([email protected])'; 'D. Gregg Brown ([email protected])'; 'Brian Parker'Cc: Pete SaboSubJeCt: FW: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE
Hi Bassem, Gregg, and Brian,
Attached please find preliminary field remediation costing from Newcastle Engineering.
Have a good weekendl
-ffi.,.#,ML%sE . f-rqi;&:s,1\a: {.*h5€.iiTE+
',.'' -''!1 *L;a: =*i-j*,:i*q3r*-€ Sp*i-+ : i=;:j:il**,: -:=:r-:+; 3:,:;+rvi*+r;lii+='i i5l-?;a-i2:: i i=x 15*-?4:-:2=: : ';=:: : *-:1:-i4::3*5 r#ar.+s;=i-: *.v=1i-:c. i1::-+ir*+, *+: -** i=i* I y,..j'i_,., _=:43. :.::.iz
From : Scott Lewis I ma ilto : Scott. Lewis@ newcastleenq i neering.com]Sent: Friday, February 2t,2014 75:L5To: Brent SpohnSubJect: CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FIELD ASSESSMENT - COST ESTIMATE
Brent
As requested, attached is our preliminary cost estimate for the Play Field Remediation at Cedar Secondary School.
We have limited the scope of the remediation area to the area that you had provided. The limit of the remediation is
shown on the attached pdf titled "CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FILED LAYOUT Feb 2L, 20L4" .
We have included the following information for your review:
: PIAN tit|Cd, CEDAR SECONDARY SCHOOL FILED LAYOUT, FCb 21.,201.4- PIAN titlEd, TEST PITS, FIELD REMEDATION, FRENCH DRAIN, FCb 21,201.4- Geotechnical Assessment prepared by Lewkowich Engineering Associated Ltd. Dated February 5,20L4- Field Assessment - Preliminary cost Estimate prepared by Newcastle Engineering Ltd, dated Feb 21,201_4
Lewkowich Engineering Associates is currently preparing a supplemental retter to address a couple of items that werebrought to their attention after their report was completed. we will need to make some minor changes to thePreliminary cost Estimate when we receive this retter.
Please review the attached documents and let me know if you require any changes. we will prepare our finalsummaryreport when we receive the additional information from Lewkowich and Associates and any comments from the schoolDistrict.
lf you have any questions, please call.
Thanks
Scott Lewis, p" Eng.Newcastle Engineering Ltd.Suite 4 - 3179 Barons RoadNanaimo, 8.C., VgT 5W5Phone: 250-756-9553 Ext. 24Mobile: 250-616-9052Fax: 250-756-9503www.newcastleengineering.comPlease note that e-maii address is changed ta
ili i litll' "\ *""".,,,{
lliil,'i1
c=4"=D
=.E;*eeY"ig-1. r3
x-=iu*;s!;---<
EE?q3
" 3g: ""2-!za.
i r";ld
P rlPii
"1*".."11rI
--t.-l
\xnx!'e::;5.'-
:'* 3
ga::i=;u!i,-"d
58".6.a?iztiF!s.-ia46s=: b
! i ";.-
ffiHOOLFIELDASSESSMENTPRELIMINARY COST ESTIMATE
tt l-
ITEM DESCRIPTION UNITI QUANIITY
Schedule A - EarthworksLS I $ i,000.00 s i,000.00
A-01 MoblllzatlonLS I s 1.000.00 s 1.000.00
A-02 enclngCM 2400 $ 25.00 $ 60,000.00
A-03Crrn.I" *d irttall Armtec 140 Non-woven geosynthetic SM 8000 $ 2.00 $ 16,000.00
A-04CM 2404 s 40.00 s 96.000.00
A-05 mnort JUUmm InICK - /Jrlrllr lllrrru) prrCM 2400 $ 4s.00 $ 108,000.00
A-06 lmpon JUUmm rnlcK - /Jllllll rrrrlru) prt I urr E
lmnnrl 100mm thick - ToP Soil
Suoolv and install grass seed
CM 800 s 50.00 s 40.000.00A-07
SM 8000 s 1.00 S 8.000.00A-08
LS I s 10.000.00 $ 10.000.00A-09 E,rosion and Sedlment uontrol
ScheduleA-EarthworksSub-Total $ 340,000'00
ScheduleB-StormSewerLS s 750.00 $ 750.00
B-01 Locate existing iUUmm dlameter btom rewLS $ 3.000.00 $ 3,000.00
B-02In-15d*m dia per pipe to erisitlg qranholg-------r,. ^-r :--+^tl ,^rl,-fr p\/a qnR ?i Stnm dr
I,S I $ 1.000.00 $ 1,000.00B-03
LM 200 $ 1 10.00 $ 22,000.00
s 50.000.00
$ 48,000.00
B-04@plete with drain rock bedding and
LM 500 $ 100.00B-05
LM 600 s 80.00B-06
00mmSDR35perforatedPVCcompletewlthdl.alnIocKDeoolngajlu
E,A t2 $ s00.00 $ 6.000.00B-07 iuDDl\ and tnstall cleanouls
EA 100 $ 1s.00 s 1.500.00B-08
EA I $ 750.00 s 7s0.00ts-u9 lKolse exlStln8 mannote rtur crsvarrutr tu t"o""" ""'"'"" s'"*'^*
rks Sub-Total $ 133,000.00Schedule B - Earthwt
Schedule C - IrrigationLS
h ^^^n nn:N Z.UUU.UU6 lnnnnnJ /.uvv.vv
c-01c-02 iotino irrioafion electrical svstem LS $ 3.000.00 s 3,000.00
$ i 5,000.00I,S s 15,000.00c-03
Sunolv and install irrigation system LS s 60.000.00 s 60.000.00c-04
Schedule C - Irrigation Sub-Total $ 80,000.00
s 553,000.00
$ 82,950.00
$ 82,950.00
$ 718,900.00
$ 35,945.00
$ 754,845.00
Overall Subtotal
ContingencY 157o
Engineering 157o
Sub-TotalGST 5%
DRAFT
FORCOMMENTTotal PreliminarY Cost Estimate
Cedar Secondary School
Field Assessment - Preliminary Cost Estimate
s066-39February 21,2014
Page 1
Addendum D
Donna Reimer
From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryAttachments: 74'02-26 - Cedar Secondary Class C FOR DISCUSSION.xIsx; 74-02-26 - Cedar Secondary
Class C FOR DISCUSSION.pdf
Importance: High
BS-28
From: Brent SpohnSent: Thursday, February 27,2014 7:50 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject: FW: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryImpoftance: High
FYI
From: Jan Williams fmailto:[email protected]]Sent: Wednesday, February 26,2014 77:25To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary
Hi Brent,Attached is our updated 'Class C for Discussion' with the exterior doors and canopies included in the base cost inlieu of optional items as well as the different breakdowns of 5/ft2 for demo, construction with and without civil,and the total project.Feel free to give me a call if you have any questions.
Cheers,
Jan Michael Williams, c.rech.Preiject Managei"
r€I: UruXTECH
Unitech Construction Management Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1530,56th StreetDelta, B.C. Canada V4L zA8T 604 943 8845 F 6c,4 943 0912 w i^r r4/.uEllethals-aa
CE€eF* T* Se* E4&.gg Gaer C.ddezefle C&*+s* Lrae€6e,c&
This e-mai1 pessar. is confrdential, may be-privileged and is intended for the exclusive use o{the addrssee. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not the intendedrecipient, or an employee or agent responsibie for delivering this message to the intended recipient, yo;;; #tt;;tlfi;;1that anyais?tosure, ;i"*;;; ".
reproduction of this e-mail message is strictly proiribited. ff the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e.mailimmediately and delete this e-mai1 message and destroy ali eopies.
Please consider the environment before printing this email.
From: Jan WilliamsSent: Wednesday, February 26,ZAl4 2:59 pM
To: 'Brent Spohn'Cc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary
Hi Brent,Attached for your reference is our 'Class C Estimate for Discussion.,Talk to you shortly.
Cheers,
Jan Michael'Williams, c.rech.Project Manager
I@r{I UilITECH
Unitech Construction Management Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1S3o, S6th StreetDelta, B.C" Canada V4L 2A8T 6o4 943 8845 F 6c'4 g4g a9L2 w ,nw-r.r'.unitechcm.ca
Ctri*& ?$ See Whg {}zrv" CZiersis C*aee:s* Lrar,ieec&
From: Brent Spohn Imailto:[email protected]]Sent: Monday, February 24,2014 9:49 AMTo: Jan WilliamsCc: Brian Parker; 'Bassem Tawfik ([email protected])'; 'D. Gregg Brown ([email protected]),Subject: RE: Cedar Conversion to ElementaryImpodancet High
Hi Jan,
Good to hear from you.
At this point, I do not have elevations for any new millwork. Perhaps Bassem or Gregg can respond?
Brent
From : lan Williams [mailto :jwilliams@u nitechcm.ca]Sent: Monday, February 24,2014 0g:39
This e-mail message, is confidential, may be- privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intendedrecipient, or an-eyPloYee.or a8ent responsible for.d_elivering this message to the intendecl recipient, you ,." t "..Lv ""tln.a
tf,ut u"v ai.'.foro.", A;;;;;;, o.reproduction of t}is e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached o1. i" ,rrit "o*"
to v*i pl"*" irr"", tt . ."r,a". ry."t * **uitimmediateiy and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies.
Please consider the envircnment befere printing this email.
To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: RE: Cedar Conversion to Elementary
Hi Brent,Do you have elevations of the new millwork?other than that, at this point, we are moving along well.I will keep you posted otherwise.
Cheers,
Jan Michael Williarns, c.tech.
Project Manager
rer: U}IITECH
Unitech Conslructinn Management Ltd,Suite 4oo - 1530, 56th StreetDelta, B.C. Canada V4L zAB\ 6049438845 F 6o4g47o9L2 w www.unitechcm.ca
Cidcle ?!:,9ee E*&g Gac-e" {.daerets Cle.r*:se L.t*iteeil
i;;;= arent Spohn Imaiito:[email protected]: Monday, February 24,2A14 9:28 AMTo: Brian ParkerCc: 'Bassem Tawfik ([email protected])'; 'D. Gregg Brown ([email protected])'Subject: Cedar Conversion to Elementary
Hi Brian,
Just wanted to confirm you have everything you need for your Cedar Conversion costing exercise?
lf you're missing anything significant please let me know.
l'll forward any new information as it becomes available.
Regards,
@
This e'maii message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exelusive use ofthe addressee. Ifthe reader ofthis message is not tl-re intendedrecipient, or an-employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any diilosure, distribution orreprodr:ction of this e-maii messa-ge is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unlcrown to you, please inform tie sender by r"to- *-"ifimmediately and delete this e-mail message and destroy all copies.
Please consider the environrnent before printing this ernail.
p€efd&3&1*
l-:i**-: i,'tc{}Y&f4=+ei ,.ti; ii * l .-.,
*r*.i Eg*i:= i i:a;:i!i:;e* fia;:=-:*g .E:,1pq:rr.:;**ii-.4:i=r:: :51]-:+:.-5::: i f:;r :5L1,:l:-=:*: : **it ii;a.?:3-j:ill:*-= W=!.=*ia* Avsru; i-i*i-:*i.-:=. SC ";*= ,1iii : .+i=r_.;3++,3.=:.c=
rff uNltgct'lCedsr Ssondary School
o74.7241,
Class'C' Estimate26-Febl4
WalE, Millwork, Ooors,
ProjedOuration in months
6;;lition and removalof existins millworL
doo6,ove.headdoo.,walls,'eilin&sawdustdtradion piping,tackboardsandwhit€boa'ds
cuttinB..d removal ofexistitg exterior w'll
Remove enlire steel studure and asso'i'ted
e^or".xttiq noo, "na
preP lorfuture floor
Demolition and removal of existin8 ceilh8,
millwork, doo6, walls,.eilinE, tackboards and
s18,ffi.@
lnctuded in.onqete cuting below
s2o,ffi.m
1.@
doo6, windos, overhead door, walb, eilirg'
teckboards and whtebo.rds
iliiGliliii.e rb una prepror ruture loor
Demolition and removal olexi{ing ceiline,
millwork, do06, overheaddoor,walls,ceiling'
tackboards and whiteboards
and refioval ofexistint millwor&
iIre exttine ttoor ara preP f'rfuture
and removal ofexi3tinB millwork,
doo6, ove.head door, wails, @ilin8,
ta.kboards and whiieboard5
reii!"rffim "na PrePfor rut!re froor
1m
2,170-60 s9,767.7O
lnterior Walts, Millwor( Doo6,
lnterior wails, Millwork, Doors,t.@
2,173-74
1.@
4_50 $e,781.89
s10,m.m
Demolition and removal ofexGtin8 ceiling,
millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceilirg'
tackboards and whiteboa'ds
Ceilin& lnterior Walts, Millwork, Doors, Defrolition and 'emoval
oferisting millwo*'
rack,Nhiteboards :"[:::'j::",',*[;:::',""'*
Auow 5,m@ 1@ s6s@6
dooB, overhead door,walls, ceiling, Allow 14,m.m 1m S14,m@
Estimated co5tfrom Can@r- cod"ete cuELng
ofinterior and exterior tilluP concrete w'lk
for new openings as shown on drawings
excludingthe ones a. wish list
Based on E*imateirom Cancor' Febr!ary
[email protected] 2s,2014t.m
SkyJithts
Interio. Padition Wails
12 Ba hanger wire carryingchanneJ, acolstj.ceil'g panel, hattiack,2 coae paintTwo 5l8" x 1018,kiptettazed skytighs,2panes of Slass with acryti. bubbte6" steel stud,5/8" d/w.il painted both sid€.
5/Cwood stain gr4 Steej fr.me, hardware,
Steel hot h PS ho@s, Wre iBt & poihaNO PANIC MRDWARESopply & i.stallation ofnew miilworksupply and instattation of whiteboardsSupplyandinstallation ottackboards
5.F
5.F
S,F,
Ea.
E..Ea.
9.a0
37.S
8.@
715.@
1,191.N165.m315.4122s.41
1,013.54 59,932.69
124.4a 54,667.9o
1,Ss.s3 S15,C2.69
5.@ S4,2S.@ Re use existiig hardware
2.@ Sa.@ tupnae heh [email protected] btow205.28 533,870.45
9.@ 52,838.5911.@ 52.47957
lnterior PadttionWafls
T-Ba. Ceiling
GWB Ceilinelnte.ior Padition Wall:
supply & insiall.tion of newnooilnp5" *ee{ *ud,5/8.d/wail painted both sides
2 coats painl 5/8" d.watt, R8sp.ayroam. ZxEseel fuds,1/2" plf, undedar R6 insut, sirap't& back'9, cementitious panebS/Cwood *ai. grd, Steet t.me, hardware.
Cdting ind removat oiertsting erte.iorw.lt
Steel doubJe doori. Ps fr.mes, hdwe inst&
Exterior @nopies above etrerior doo.s
Supply & installatlon of newnoodng
12 gi hangerwire, crrying channet, E@us!i<
5/8 d/wall, Metat HarTrack, painted6" sreel *ud,5/8,'dlwalt painied both sides
5/Cwood *ain srd, Sreet f.ane, hardware,
Steel door in PSframes, hdwre in$& paint NOPANICHARDWARE1 1/2" 22 gauge metat deckin8, steet f.ahin&
Supply & in*all.tion ofnew miilworkSupply & in*Eliation ot new bEse and upper
Supplyand installationof whiteboards5!pplyand,nstallationof tackboadsincoridor in lieu ofdkot.v c.ser
6.@ 2,770.60
3.90 \41.773.35 243,52
8.m $3.27
715.@ 7.m
1,p1.m z@
7,ff.@ 2_@165.@ 59.31
291.@ 21.U315.41 4.m
225.47 2_@
s13,023.60
sss2-e?s816.11
s7,225.43
S5,m5.@ Reuse exhri.t hardware
51s,@.rcs11,436.11
s6,487.68t7,261.U
s49.82
S,F
277.35
y,991.52
s2 27a q
47.39 51,0&.33
!@ S715.@
1.m s1,1S_@
l.m 51,89.@1.@ 59,m.m
s.F
S,F
Ea.
Ea.
€a.
Ea-
E!.
T'BarCeiling
lnte.ior P.rtition W!lb
T-EarCeiling
lnterior Padtion Watk
Glazed Paditions and Sidetites
6" +eel *ud, 5/8,' d/walt pajnled both sides
Steel tuot ]n PS homd, hdwft id & pohtNOPANICMRDWAre1 7/2" 2 guqe meto! de.ktnq, neet Jruaihg,
Supply & installation oi new miltworkSupply aod ihstallation of whiieboardssupply and in*allation of tackboardr
s!pply & jn*allano. oi new noon^n
-12 ga hanser urq Grryina.lan^eiao,*t
Supply& insta lation ofnewioorins12 Ba ha.gerwtq ca.ryihg chan.et, acoustic
5" *eel st!d,5/8,, d/wall painted both sides
Tempered Sl.ssto tea.ninsassisrance room -
s/Cwood stai. grd, Steel frame ha.dware,
Supp y & instaltation ofnew miuworkS!pply and installetion oi whireboards
Sopply & insral ation of newTempe.edgtassto.ew.oil.bor.tion area
Supply & instaltarioo oinew floorina12 g. hangerUrq €rrying channet, a@ustic
6" *eel *ud, s/8. d/walt painted both sider
S/Cwood *ain Brd, Sleel fiame, hardwar-.,
supply & insrailation olnew millworkSupplyand in*allationoiwhiteboards
s2,767.10
s3,174.58
5o.@ Sepeture ibm didded bbw
$O.@ sep@re treh e.nhed bbws75,229.72
s946.23s1,127.0s
S,F
S,F
Eo.
Ea.
6.m
:.90
8.m
7,791.W
555.82
396.85
z@92_30
3.@5.@
?,186 8.1241)
5s,989.07
s6,s78.55
s2,13s.13
52,145.m Re use exkting hardwareS19,981.69
s946_23
1,535.66
822.40
81.m
3.m
635.5852.@
T-BarCeiling
.terior Pantion Watt!
s13,92_s2
52,610.36
5s,7s.92
5715.@ R€ useexhijn8 hardwares15,45.54
s630.82Ea.
669.32
n3.69
2.AO
civitwork lmlwo*r, **. **e,.nd tri8arion Be<.d on Newca*le EnSineeri.s's Estimate
Esr. 553,W.m 1.m s553,m.&
Ensineering
% 553,m-@ $.m s82,9so.s9{ 553,m.@ 15.S s82,950.m
Residential buildi.s per sqosre foot co5t 26 @@ Est gased on Elect Consultant EstimateBqilding
10.2 5!perintendent
10.3 Const.udion G€neral Co.ditions
10.4 Constudion Managem€nt F€es
wrap !p General Liabilitya.d BuildersRisk
OnsitesuperyEio. includinEsitetransPod,
Gene.al conditiont for 3ite preparation and
Iot3l Co.*rudion Management Fees &
Allow 9,s.@ 1.m 59,5@@
Allow 42,@-@ 1.@ S42,mm
Allow 7!2,271.87 1.@ 5112,271.87
Allow 75.m.@ 1.m S75,m.m
!uit elementary students if req!ired
Pl.yground Reloc.tion
11.1 Construdion Co.tingenq
11.2 Design contingenq
ol.vsround eq!iomentAllow:n.e for unforeseen.hanges during
constuction 99 99 99
Ailowan.e for remeasured hems, design
1O.m \473,A!4.23 s147,:01.42
5.m 1.473.014,23 573,650.71
of uhneeded lockeE etc Allow zs.m.@Ouldoor dassroom, plants, spodssrea etc- Allow 15,@.mReiootion ofWoodbank and NCI school
1.@ S2s,m1.@ s15,@
Budget as perSD 68 estimate dated Oec 10,
1.@ 5175,@ 2013175,@.m
develoDm ent ch anres 9999@ %
12.1 Consultants Fees - qlote consultant Fees Allorv So
12.1 ConsultanE Fees- E*imaied12.2 conslltants oisbursements- Quote consultant Disbursemenb ALlow ' 50 "---_------__cl13.1 Land purdase Land cosr Allow S0
13.2 Develooment Costs
Consultant Fees Estimated
Co{ perSquare F@t - Oemolition
costpersqu.reF6t-Newconstrudio. IncudingConstudionMa.agefrentFees_NOT NCLUD|NGovilwod
Cost persquar€ F6t - New Construdio. lncluding @nskudion Ma.ageme.t Fees- INCLUDTNG Civil work
cost per Squa.e F@t - Projed
Co* perftuare Meter - Demolition
co*perftuareMeter.Newconstudionlncludingcoil*rldionManagementFees'NoTlNcLUDlNGcivilwoilCo* perftuare Mder -New Constudion lncluding Con*.ldion Management Fees_ INCLUDING Civil work
Cost perSquare Mder - Prcjed
S10.87
$118.17
s167.66
s178-52
S116.9s
s1,272.0s
S1,s.57
s1,92r.67
Itfiffiffiii*-*-iiill.*aq*-".'
-ffinfu
*.tu. walB tudas d.d removal ol eri*lns exredor wall
&.turboB - blbbtutuaA@ &lo.tk@&t Ed
s.eel @r io PS ffrdes, Mwre i6 & FiatNaPANI'HARDWARE Ed
Sted bor in PS ftutu, Hw.e th* & PohtNOPANICHARDWAAE&etur .snopies obva etkn.t doc$
a. -k4dtl. il& i EE u iN b & ea, tid aa b*de b@tbn to su lt e ktuntq nu* n&
72@.@ Z@ s4@.@
1,191-@ 2.@ s4e@
Ab* 6,@.@ 1.@ 56,N.@
!,19.@
Ee L1q,@ L@ 52,382.@Nroe 7,sN.@ 2.N $ls,w.@
Addendum E
Donna Reimer
From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar - alternate plan to match enrolment at a lower costAttachments: CE - Enrollment Projections 201-5- 2020.pdf; Altenate Plan -March 2.pdf; Base Plan.pdf;
Design aid areas.pdf
Importance: High
PS-33
From: Pete SaboSent: Sunday, March 02,2014 1;54 PM
To: Cathal Walsh; Bob Esliger; Bassem Tawfik ([email protected]); Gregg Brown ([email protected]); Brian Parker(bparker@u nitechcm.ca)Cc: John Blain; Brent Spohn; '[email protected]'; [email protected]; Les Brown([email protected]); Stephen McNicholls ([email protected]); Scott Lewis(Scott. Lewis@ newcastleeng ineering.com)Subject: Cedar - alternate plan to match enrolment at a lower costImportance: High
To all,
Further to the Board motions on Feb 6th lwith respect to NO and EDR) and the costing received from Unitech, Facilitieshas is proposing the attached 'alternative'to the existing conversion plan.
We looked a Cathal's enrolment projection and using A4+B3 and it now looks like we have a forecast enrolment ofaround297. Ourcurrentdesignisfor38T. Basedonthisinformation-tobeconfirmedbyLS-weshouldbeabletoreduce the number of Gl rooms required for opening.
I spoke with JB regarding the possible reductlon of spaces and the attached alternate "plan" and he and I are nowofficially requesting your comments (ASAP) as we believe this is a viable plan to proceed with.
As the most costly space is the Woodwork shop conversion, we now propose an alternate that would see:
o The construction shop remaino Room 204 converted to a grade 7 roomo Room 202-1- used as a break out room/Da Vinci space.o Room 202 used as a collaboration/breakout/special education space.o Foods/Textile room 200 converted to a Glo Foods 1"07 converted to a Gl
This change would include:
o Loss offour Gl and one SP ED. room. The gain of 3 good size Gl roomso Retain collaboration space.r Provide a grouping of 3 (possibly 6-7)Gl roomso Retention of Servery and Storage room for the use of the school, PAC and community in the provision of food
services.
o Significant reduction is construction cost as we are avoiding all work in the woodwork shop.o Retention the woodshop for possible further education uses and/or use by the community.o No moving of walls in 202,204, or 1a7o Causethelossof aSPEDspace. ThisfunctionwouldneedtobeperformedoutoftheAdminarea,the
Counselling area, the Learning Commons, the stage, the MP room, the Music Room, the Da Vinci studio, etc., as
space was available"o A reduction of opening capacity from 387 to 363 ------- 38 K + 325 (1-7)o Confirmation of an opening enrollment less than 363 could result in further savings as we could avoid the
renovation of one of the foods rooms.
I will work with Brent Spohn to put together an order of magnitude "cost reduction" for the above option as well as aphasedoptiontothePlaygroundandPlayfieldareas(usingUnitech'sandNewcastle's)estimate) -topresenttoSeniorManagement on Monday at 11am.
Any and allcomments, thoughts, cost advice, etc. that is received priorto 10:30 am Monday would be most appreciated.
Brent and I will be considering a School Construction Committee meeting some time the week of March 3 or early in theweek of March loth to discuss the status of the planning prior to the March 13th business committee. As information isdeveloping, I request your confidence in these discussions untilwe can advise the School Construction Committee of ourwork to date.
Thanks,
Pete
*ffi*-.ffi,€-:-siis". ** 4*€ eiet F -tc +}Yq€"f J
6,H
t r'U*€-ii.' 5a*i=:trL=Pete Sabo i *ir*eitr +i F;er;ning =-* *i;=*rai;*ns*iiec: 2i* 7d j-5=#5 i ,*ifi=* :5* 754-55:'i i -=;< 25+1 :4:-5:5:,1"15 ,*a;<e*i=n A=erue, i'i+**l:i:+:. A* V$= 3i<* i .*,=:+i.,,.-#S3 3r e*
Enrollment Projections For Cedar Elementory 2075 - 2079;Considerotions To North Oyster And South Wellington
A1+81A1+82A1+83A1+84
A2+81AZ+ Bz
A2+83A2+84
43+8143+8243+8343+84
A4+81A4+82A4+83A4+84
By Grade ::j.i'.20i5:: -.::,-i26rr= ,,,,?,20fl,1:,:: :...'*201'9.-=
Baragar Data Using
Only WoodbankPrimary & North Cedarlntermediate Schools
K 28 32 44 43 431 32 23 26 35 352 34 32 24 26 37
3 28 33 31 22 25
4 40 29 32 31 22
5 37 4A 28 31 295 35 34 37 25 28
7 43 35 35 37 25
Totals 277 258 257 251, 244
Considerations
A1 100% North Oyster
AZ 60% North Oyster
43 30% North Oyster
A4 0% North Oyster
81 100% South Wellington
82 60% South Wellington
83 30% South Wellington
84 0% South Wellineton
444 424 432 425 4\8417 397 405 398 391
396 376 384 377 374375 356 364 357 3s0
404 38s 389 383 376377 3s8 362 355 348
357 337 342 335 328
336 3L7 321 315 308
375 355 357 351 344348 328 330 324 317
327 308 310 303 296307 287 289 283 276
345 326 325 319 312318 299 298 292 285
297 278 277 277 264277 258 257 251" 244
,t*J-d:-r:il:
lr:i;'
g;f.:] Jrl+, i -i-t:'-i-**-
*.-;.* lil
'(-, s'\,\' \\,\\
qi.\{er i"l(
\\iJ:. I
E:"a
,11' .t
\,' 't' ' '.L=_=';t. :.
Xri ,
E!;i.( r{i, r7:, t'a:" l;t".
:r:: i
QI:l
:j
-t t)c:{i-
r?lfi z
?5:.--': :.Lr-
.', <:,4{.
C r!C) €t
FF T
:-* {
.g'
i
!i :l
:J .ir,(
bH ,f-gru;r:.lE.u)
F
-fH5 &81t{E.- E *-il{ I t* H
,Ef $$ 3 $ .8*FT#ESS g 3 i EssiEHEsx $ t u E*
*s
&e"- \*l
qflt r*\r#A,'dY *S#
- S.h* {a{k €*- "G,s" de*t**r';urx *3*&-:?g %s %F.*qljFq* e _&"*x..- - g,Esaa
€ 8q*"* x*-*€ i-;t !b*.r
Xa
i9Ir,
Z1rnl*lPIalo_l=lololrrlOIqLL I -".
-l'LI ,
al.>I:n\U
rY
=f:{E& -'
Addendum F
Donna Reimer
From: Discovery Search MailboxSubject: FW: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and SummaryAttachments: 1,4-A3-07 - Cedar Secondary Class C - Alternate After Discussion.xlsx; 14-03-07 - Cedar
Secondary - Alternate Class C Summary GENERAL.pdf
BS-37
From: Brent SpohnSent: Monday, March L0,2014 B:09 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject: FW: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and Summary
FYI
From : Ja n Williams Imailto :[email protected]]Sent: Friday, March 07,20L4 70t36To: Brent SpohnCc: Brian ParkerSubject: Cedar Secondary Class C Estimate and Summary
Morning Brent,Attached is our revised alternate estimate in excel format and as a one page summaryas requested in pdfformat.Give me a call if you have any questions.
Cheers,
Jan Miehael Williams, c.Tech.
Project Managei'
I€ElI UNITECH
p;*jr:t* -",':lh i:* rpi:se.urutecn uonsu:ucaon Managernent Ltd.Suite 4oo - 1530, 56th StreetDeita, B.C. Canada V4L zA8T 6a4 9438845 F 6c.4949c912 w wwrv.unitechcm.ca
Cdde& ?b se* trfu?ag {32;-x {li*ga{s f&a<ese Lla-+dsee&
This e-mail message is confidential, may be privileged and is intended for the exclusive use of the addressee. If the reader of this message is not the intendedreeipient, or an employee or agent responsible for delivering this message to the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that any disclosure, distribution orreproduction of this e-mail message is strictly prohibited. If the addressee cannot be reached or is unknown to you, please inform the sender by return e-mailimmediately and delete this e.mail message and destroy all copies.
r''ae(?7 Please consider the env;ronment before printing this email.
I5 ururrEcHCedar Secondary School
0
77,a53
Project Duration in months
Alternate Class'C' Estimate7-Mar.14
- - vl tilnce llgm F! 1 27 9llf c.lLtg D..i-T::ligl
--' " :::::::'::': t::N(ilQBIStDecrease
SF Gross Area
M2 Gross Area
cutting out concrete and leaving columnsto
Concrete Cut-outs Cutting out concrete and leaving columns to
suooort structural beam aboveSo.oO New jtem ofwork now included
Remove exasting floor and prep for future floor
Demolition and removal of existing millwork,
doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,sawdust
extraction piping, tackboards and whiteboards
Cutting and removal of existing exterior wall
Remove enti.e steel structure and associated
walls and ductwork.
4.50
18,500.00
20.000.00
lncluded in concrete cutting below
Walls, Millwork, Doors, Tack/Whiteboards
FloorinB
Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,
millwork, doors, walls, ceilinE, tackboards and
whiteboardsRemove existing floor and prep for future floor
tnreri- Wrtt.. l/l,ll.ork, Doors, Tackfwhiteboards Demolition and removal of existing millworl!
52.5oo.ooReduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side
of existing interior partitions in lieu of entire
50.00 room area
doors, windows, overhead door, walls, ceiling,
tackboards and whiteboards
Remove existing floor and prep for future floor
Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,
millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,
tackboards and whiteboardsCutting and removal of existing exterior wall
:'::.aa:a=.'a aReduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either sideFlooring
Ceiling, lnterior Wells, Millwork, Doors,
Tack/Whiteboards
Exterior Walls
:,- ::j 1: : :;,';,:1,1 o1 .*isting interior partitions in lieu of entire
.:,:::,'].:,$r*4;it roo- "
ru"
4.50
8,000.00
774.25 |
I
1.00 I
flooring to 3-foot strip on either sideFlooring
ceiling, lnterior Walls, M illwork, Doors,
Tack/Whiteboards
i.:l-::l,:,':' l of existin8 inte rior pa ft itions in lie u of entire
:,,!.i-l'-? '""^"'""
.:::$5;E0o$Sl
Remove existing floor and prep for future floor
Demolition and removal of existing millwork,
doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling, tackboards
and whiteboards
296.70 t'=
1.00 i.::.i_
Flooring
Interior Walls, Millwork, Doors, Tack/Whiteboards
Exterior Walls
Remove existing floor and prep forfuture floor
Demolition and removal ofexisting millwork,
doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling, tackboards
and whiteboardsCutting and removal ofexisting exterior wall
10,000.00
New flooring to 3-foot strip on either side of
$0.00 existins interior partitions
So.oo
lncluded in concrete cuttinB below
trt"ri.^//"lkJ,Ail*.diDoors,Tack/Whiteboards DemolitionandremovalofexistinBmillwork,doors, overhead door, walls, ceilinS, tackboards
and whiteboards7,500.00
Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side
of existing interior partitions in lieu of entire
room area
Flooring
Ceiling, lnteraor Walls, Millwork, Doors,
Tack/Whiteboards
Remove existing floor and prep for future floor
Demolition and removal of existing ceiling,
millwork, doors, overhead door, walls, ceiling,
tackboards and whiteboards
Estimated cost from Cancor - Concrete cutting o,
interior and exterior tilt-up concrete walls for
new openings as shown on drawings excluding
the ones as wish list
Concrete CuttinE
15,000.00 1.00 S25,OO0.oO Reduce wall openings to minimum required
Flooring
T-8ar Ceiling
Skylishts
lnterior Partition Walls
lnterior Doors
Erteilar Doors
MillworkWhiteboardsTackboards
Supply & installation of new flooring
12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic
ceil'g panel, hat track, 2 coats PaintTwo 5'-8" x 10'-8" triple glazed skylights, 2 panes
of Elass with acrylic bubble
6" steel stud, 5/8" d/wall painted both sides
S/C wood stain trd, Steel frame, hardware,
painted,
Steel door in Ps lrames, hdwre iist & pqint NO
PANIC HARDWARE
Supply & installation of new millwork
Supplv and installation of whiteboardssupplv and installation of tackboards
Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side
ofexisting interior pafritions in lieu ofentire50.00 room areaS,F.
allow
s.F.
s.F.
Ea.
Eo.
allowEa.
6.00
2,500.00
37.50
8.00
715.00
1,191.0010,000.00
375.47
225.47
- Sooo
So oo
so.o0
So.o0 Re use existing hardware
2.OO SO.ffiseperuteitemestimotedhelow1.OO s10,000.005.OO s1,577.0s6.00 57,352.46
supply & installation of new flooring
6.00
8.00Interior Partition walls
Exterior Walls
lnterior Doors
Exterior Doors
Exterior Canooies
6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides
2 coats paint, 5/8" d.wall, R8 sprayfoam, 2x6
steel studs,l/2" ply, underlay, R6 insul, strap'g &
back'g, cementitious panels
s/C wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.
Steel double door in Ps frames, hdwre inst &
paintExterior canopies above exterior doors
S. F.
Ea.
22.46
715.O0
1,850.00
9.000.00
Supply & installation of new flooring
T-Bar Ceiling
GWB Ceilinc
lnterior Partition Walls
lnterior Doors
Exterior Doors
Exterior Canopies
MillworkKitchen Millwork
WhiteboardsTackboards
12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic
ceil'g panel
5/8 d/wall, Metal Hat Track , Painted
6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides
S/c wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,painted.
Steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO
PANIC HARDWARE1 1/2" 22 gauge metal decking, steel framing,painted flashinesSupply & installation of new millworkSupply & installation of new base and upper
millworksupply and installation of whiteboardsSupply and installation of tackboards in corridor
in lieu of disolav cases
S, F.
S.F.
5t
S.F.
Ea.
Ea.
L.F.
L.F,
Ea-
6.00
3.903.35
8,00
715.00
1,191.00
7,500.00165.00
29-t.O0
315.41
Flooring
T-8ar Ceiling
lnterior Partition Walls
lnterior Doors
Exterior Doors
Exteilor Cdnopies
MillworkWhiteboardsTackboards
Supply & installation of new flooring
12 ga hanger wire, carryinB channel, acoustic
ceil'g panel
6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides
S/C wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,
painted.Steet doot in PS f.ames, hdwte inst & pdint NO
PANl,CHARDWARE7 7/2" 22 guoge metst decking. steel frdming,ooioted floshiaosSupplv & installation of new millwork
Supplv and installation of whiteboardssupply and installation of tackboards
s. F.
S.F.
s.F.
Eo,
Ed.
L.F.
Ea,
Ea.
6.00
3.90
8.00
715.00
1,197.N
7,500.&165.00315.41
225.47
296.70 i:=:
ss5.82
395.86
2.00 |i'i=
2.OO
=92.30 ?.;:::
3.00
:: Reduce floorinc to 3-foot strip on either side
':iof existing interior partitions in tieu of entire
item estimoted below
:)seporote item estimdted below
5.00 ii':.:=
Supplv & installation of new floo.ingFloorang
T-Bar Ceiling
lnterior Partition Walls
Glazed Partitions and Sidelites
lnterior Doors
12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic
ceil't panel
6" steel stud, 5/8" d/wall painted both sides
Tempered glass to learning assistance room
assumed 7'heiehtS/C wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.
S.F.
s,F.
s.F.
S.F.
Ea.
6.00
3,90
8.00
26.36
715.00
Reduce flooring to 3-foot strip on either side
ofexisting interior paditions in lieu ofentireSo.oo room area
s0.00
so.oo
s0.00
SO.OO Re use existing hardware
Steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO
PANIC HARDWARESupply & installation of new millwork
Supply and installation of whiteboards
Supply & installation of new flooring6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides
S/C wood stain grd, Steel frame, hardware,painted.steel door in PS frames, hdwre inst & paint NO
PANIC HARDWAREsupplv & installation of new millworksupplv and installation of whiteboardsSupply and installation of tackboardsTempered glass to new collaboration area
L.F
S.F.
Ea.
L.F.
Ea.
s.F.
6.00
8.00
715.00
1,191.00165.00375.47
225,4r26.36
new flooring and use existingFlooringlnterior Partition Walls
lnterior Doors
E*erior Doors
MiilworkWhiteboardsTackboards
Glazed Partitions52.OO
Supply & installation of new flooring
12 ga hanger wire, carrying channel, acoustic
ceil'g panel
6" steel stud,5/8" d/wall painted both sides
s/c wood stain grd, steel frame, hardware,painted.
steel door in Ps frames, hdwre inst & paint NO
PANIC HARDWAREsupply & installation of hew millworksupply and installation of whiteboards
S.F,
6.00
3.90
8.00
715.00
1,191.00165.00315.41
flooring to 3-foot strip on either side
existinE interior partitions in lieu ofentireroom area
Re use existing hardware
T-Bar ceiling
lnterior Partition Walls
lnterior Doors
Exterior Doors
MillworkWhiteboards
L,F
Ea.
Est. 40,000.00 ,.00 545,000.00 Reduced to match revised oppenings
CivilWork Earthworks,stormsewerandirrigation .. - .- QuotefromNewcastleEngineering
Allow 600,000.00 1.00 ,]56@,000.00 includins small continqencv
ContingencyEngineering
- 1.00- So.oo
as per latest concept leavinB
Wood shop alone and renovating the two
Based on Mechanical Consultant Estimate
sprinklers, water lines
23 00 00
23 00 00
200,000.00
72.00
1.00 S2oo,ooo.oo foods rooms
So.oo7.1 IMechanical to Building
7.2 Plumbing
8.1 Electrical to Buildine Based on Electrical Consultant Estimateas per latest concepl
Wood Shop alone and renovating the twofoods rooms. reusing exasting lights, power
5150,000.00 and data where possible
10.1 lnsurance
10.2 Superintendent
10.3 Construction General Conditions
10.4 Construction Management Fees
Wrap up Geheral Liability and Builders Risk
On site superuision including site transpoft, and
LoA if reouiredGeneral Conditions for site preparation and
construction facilitvTotal Construction Management Fees &
Disbursements
175,000.00
9,500.00
42,O00.00
172,277.87
75,000.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
1.00
Building Modifications
Landscaping
Playground Relocation
11.1 Construction Contingency
11.2 Desicn Contingency
To suit elementary students if required -
lowering desks, basketball backstops, .emoval ofunneeded lockers etcOutdoor classroom, plants, sports area etc.
Relocation of woodbank and NCI schoolplavsround equipmentAllowance for unforeseen changes durihg
construction 99 99 99 %
Allowance for remeasured items, design
Allow 15,ooo.oo 1.00 50.00
Allow 160,000.00
% 600,000.00 15.00 s0.00
Budget as per 5D 68 estimate dated Dec 10,
1.OO 5160,000.00 2013 excludine seo. contieencv
25,000.00
development chanEes 99 99 00 "/.
6.00 7,422,875,77 585,372.55 Contingency reduced from 1070
3.OO 1,422,875,77 542,686.27 contintency reduced from 10%
12.1 Consultants Fees - Quote Consultant Fees Allow 16 OO S0 00
l2.l consultants Fees - Estimated consultant Fees Estimated Allow f ,422,a75 77 76'00 5-227,680.'1.2
6,000.00 1.00 . 56;000.0012.2 Consultants Disbursements - QuoteEngineering Fees - Quote
Consultant DisbursementsEngineering
Cost per Square Foot - Demolition
Cost per Square Foot - New Construction
Cost per Square Foot - New Construction
Cost per Square Foot - Project
Cost per Square Meter - Demolition
Cost per Square Meter - New Constructton
Cost per Square Meter - New Construction
Cost per Square Meter - Project
lncluding Construction N4anagement Fees
lncluding Construction N4anagement Fees
lncluding Construction Management Fees
lncluding Construction Management Fees
NoT INCLUDING civil work
INCLUDING Civilwork
NOI INCLUDING Civil work
INcLUDING Civilwork
s4.81
S63.7s
$114.33
S166.03
Ss1.83
S68G.21
$1,230.64
5r,787.27
Exterior Wolls Cutting oid removol of existing exterior wsllfor the new doot
Exterior D@rs - Cotlabordtioo Arco & Clossroow Steel door in PS lromes, hdwre inst & pdifrt NO
PANIC HARDWANE
Ed. 1,2M,N
Eo. 7,797.(n
Eo. 1"150.N
fo. 1,191.00
Allow 7,5N.U)
2,00 s2,300.00
2.W s2,382.002.(n s15,0N.U)
2.00
2.N
Cutting ond removol of existing erterior woll
Steel doot in PS frones, hdw.e inst & point NO
PANICHARDWAREE derior conopies obove exterior doors
Erter'pt wslls
trterior Doos
Erterior Compies
Re-instoll exining lrinols & frnities to lowtelevdtiofr to svit elemeotory students
Urinols & VilitiesAtlow 6,0&00 7.AO s6,000.N
fflnr Io 6rG iorrrrqs ,r&toil film b gt6t toitings loot irlg ow ffittl'iurwilea 53527.50 As per supplier, based on frosted film
rT UNTTECHCedar Secondary School
DemolitionDemolition and removal of existing interior walls, ceilings, doors, millwork,
tackboards and whiteboards as required (not including concrete cut-outs)
Concrete Cut-outsBudget price from Cancor Cutting and Coring to cut interior and exterior tilt-upconcrete walls for new openings
New ConstructionNew construction and general improvements to rooms as required: New flooring,
interior partitions, t bar ceilings, millwork, exterior wall patching and interiorglazing to match existing
Exterior CanopiesBudget price from Steeltec to supply new exterior canopies above exterior doors
Structural SteelBudget price from Holdfast Metals to provide structural metal work to new
openings
Sports Field
Budget price from Newcastle Engineering to strip existing field and install new grass
sports field including new drainage and irrigation and tying-into existing
MechanicalBudget price from consultant Rocky Point Engineering, to install new mechanical
systems, renovate, convert and reuse existing mechanical systems where possible
ElectricalBudget price from consultant RB Engineering, to install new electrical systems, toreuse existing lights, power and data where possible
General Requirements & Fees
Wrap-up liability insurance, superintendent costs, own forces labour, general
conditions and construction management fees
ContingencyBuilding modification contingency to suit elementary students, playground
relocation, 6% construction contingency and3% design contingency
Consultant Fees & Soft Costs
Architectural, mechanical and electrical consultant fees and disbursements
r&Alternate Class'C' Estimate - Summary
March l,2ot4
32,116.58
25,000.00
737,796.82
24,000.00
45,000.00
600,000.00
200,000.00
1s0,000.00
238,771.87
313,058.82
233,660.12
Estimated Total Proiect cost 1'998'804'21
"Vt.r'1
Unitech construction Management LtdSuite 4oo - r53o 56th Street
Delta, BC V4L 248
r 604 943 8845 F 604 943 ogl2 w unitechcm.ca
Addendum G
Donna Reimer
From:Subject:
PS-07
Discovery Search MailboxFW: Feasibility for a DVR systems at the new Cedar Elementary
From: Pete SaboSent: Friday, January t0,2014 L:47 ?M
To: Brian HackwoodCc: Robert Lumsden; Brent SpohnSubject: Feasibility for a DVR systems at the new Cedar Elementary
Brian, Brent and I have been working with the Architect with respect to site development at the new CE and would like
to see if your staff could put together a high level feasibility and costing for a video surveillance system on the building
that would cover the site and perhaps even allow for a zoom in on the skate park, that would give the school betterability to supervise the site.
We may also be interested in an option for interior spaces as well.
This is at the idea stage and we have not discussed with LS orthe future principal.
Let's meet to discuss how we might proceed.
Tha nks,
Pete
ukeg-" ru*ru,&! e* c"e*Yrs€4€ry
'ji 6:l-i*a'Ll St H**r_EPete Sabo i L,1a;"*et*i +i Fi=rni-q *;:J ilper=i:+r:s*rre*t ?5tl74,=-52** i Offie* ?5* 75*-55=l i F=x ?5* 14:-525:;1ti !"i*i.reai=i'r Ar'*+i:+, i*asai-ii+, *C V*Fi 3K* ! ig,l*-+*,e?.bg,,:;C
Addendum H
Donna Reimer
Frorrr Discovery Search MailboxSubject FW: March 3 ACEAttachments: AFG Action Sheet _ 2014_tS Z4l2t411L5.docx; Cedar Elementary.doc; 2014_15 AFG -
Enhanced Facilities for Learning priorities 2502L4.pptx
Impoftance. High
BS-34
From: Brent SpohnSent: Friday, February 28,201410:16 AMTo: Pete SaboSubject; March 3 ACEfmpoftance: High
Hi Pete,
As discussed, your input and assistance with the attached are most appreciated.
Brent
THE BOARD OF EDUCATION OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 68
ACTION SHEET
TO: Business Committee
FROM: Pete Sabo, Director of Planning and OperationsBrent Spohn, Facilities Planning Supervisor
DATE: March 13,2014
SUBJECT: 2A14115 Annual Facility Grant (AFG)
REFERENCE:t 2014-15 AFG Plan - Enhanced Facilities for Learning Priorities
(0 pages attached).* Ministry of Education Policy Document: Annual Facility Grant (3
pages attached).* Schedule A - Ministry of Education 2013-14 Annual Facility
Grant Allocation (1 page attached).
BACKGROUND: Each year the Ministry of Education announces the amount of theAnnual Facility Grant, to be used by the Districts for projects thatmeet Ministry of Education Policy '1 .'l .100.
The Annual Facility Grant was introduced in 1988189 as a sharablecapital allowance supplementing the School Board's operatingbudget and funding projects required to extend facility life,especially re-roofi n g.
Several years ago, the Ministry changed the AFG process andincreased funding to $2.56 million. Annualtargeted funding for non-structural seismic mitigation was also approved. Projects up to $1.5million became eligible.
DISCUSSION: The Ministry of Education is expected to announce status quo AFGfunding on or about March 15,2A14. For 2A13-14 School District 68was allocated a total of $2,613,085. The AFG Allocation ScheduleA indicates that SD 68 received a capital potlion amounting to$'1,947,936 and an operating portion amounting to $665,149. Theoperating portion was reduced by a contribution of $71,266 towardthe continuing implementation of Capital Assef ManagementSerurbes. A further contribution to the Ministry initiative to upgradePL Net is anticipated.
It is expected that all school districts will have to provide the Ministrywith 2014-15 AFG plan and cash flow before any funding is
allocated.
C:\Users\donna.reimerLAppData\Local\Microsoft\Windows\Temporary lnternet Files\Content.Outlook\QI9BWJML\AFG Action Sheet- )^4 A -1F' ,nir4,1 'l 4 14 rlarw
page 2
RECOMMENDATION:
Past practice suggests that the Ministry of Education wi, arsoadvise School Districts tfrri,' - "'.:. Existing AFG balances must be fully utilized.* once the operating porrion oitn"
"il";;il;is expended acertificate of Appr6var for the capitat porton oflhe arocationwill be granted.* A capitar byraw wi, be required before the certificate ofApproval is issued.A plan for the expenditure of this anticipated AFG funding has beendeveloped considering the iof f o*ing,* Priority support for the Ten year Enhanced Facitities forLearning ptan.t' High priority District wide annuar.programs, inctuding re_roofing,^ flooring and energy management.** Comptetion ol:_"!9ted hish
.priorlly AF.c. grojects, inctuding. So.g supporting educatio"nripiogrr* initiatives.* Funding in support of initiativ&'to reduce vandarism.r" :.TX?ff[J tlflfiffi;;;' unroreseen
",",g"nr projects
lit:r:l; below summarizes proposed spendins by Ministry AFG
# MINISTRYAFG CATEGORYBUDGET % OF BUDGET1
z3
46
o
7
oo
10
11
Mechanical System UpgradesElectrical System UpgradesFacility UpgradeLoss Prevention projectsFunctional ImprovementsTechnology lnfrastructure [_lnore"teeSite UpgradesDisabled AccessAsbestos AbatementHealth and Safety UpgradesSite Servicing
TOTAL ALLOCATED BUDGETEMERGENT PROJECTS AND CONTINGENCYCAMS CONTRIBUTIONTOTAL ANTICPATED FUNDING
$750,000.00
$1ss,000.00$15,000.00
$909,000.00
$13,000.00
$215,000.00
$45,000.00
$210,000.00$2s,000.00
$6500.00$12,500.00
$.00
32.13%5.70o/o
0.64%38.95%
0.56%
9.21%
1.93%9.00%1.07%
0.28%0.54%O.O0o/o
$207,819.00
$71,266.00$2,613,085.00
That the Business committee recommends to the Board ofEducation that the 2a14-15 Annuar Facirity Grant pran in the varueof $2,013,08S be approved.
TO:
FROM:
DATE:
SUBJECT:
THE BOARD OF EDUCATTON OF SCHOOL DISTRICT 68
ACTION SHEET
The Board of Education
Pete Sabo, Director of Planning and Operations
March 5,2014
Conversion of Cedar Secondary to Cedar Elementary
BACKGROUND:
At the June 26,2013, Regular Board meeting, the.Bgard of Education took the following step inrelationtothe10-YearEnhancedFacilitiesforLedngPlan:
Approved a bytcrw to close Ceclctr Community'sicon,lary on June 30, 2013. ,,, ,.
At the Special Board Meeting o, o"t ,'Is,2013,rh";lldmotions were also pirr.a,
The Uoord-,^.::::*:n,t^ 1 ,/*1 ,4om^ g1[BR arr"*on1, ,,r;*r1 ;." to use as a guide.for the revisioning of cedar sbcon{4ry.
^oy Seprymt", isin i io:r[;;op';", hetd by K 4BRArchitects. There::rtere'approximatn$ so puopta in attendanci i;;t;d;"g trustees, schooldistrictfficials andpACiepreserutatiies. ' ,,,..,
,, ,, , ,
That the ao*'i'$earcltigtit;ods.chool-Disrric:r 68lNanaiio,-Ladysmith) receives theSeptember 1 3, 20]3,.Cedai',School Conieision' Visioning W_r;iti;; n p*, prepared byKMBRArchitectsPlanners rnc. and,use the report as a guidef;;pTr;;i",gpurposes ro
,,,ihat the Boarcr ,f {!"r!::zn of schoor. oiii;r't 68 (Nanaimo-Ladysntith) follow itsPro'licy/Proceduie No--40!5 for,,appointing a sch'ool consrruction committeefor the newCedai Elementarv Schd6l. "
-,.-
Staff had a vision sissign, 1
vision document was prepared and have been working with the architectteam, ha-v'e ioni-retj a sehooi construCtion committee, have had six meetings with the schoolconstruction commif.tee, have a team of sub-consultants, have developed the plans to a point ofschematic design, have hired alonstruction cost consultant to provid! pricing, did a detailedgeotechnical site drainage review, and recently met with the s&ool construction commiftee andreviewed the scope development to date by the sub-consultants for the building and site and the costingas presented.
DISCUSSION:
Staff have been working with the principal designate, cathalwalsh, the school construction committeeand senior staff from Learning Services to develop the plans as attached.
The plan has been linked to the vision in as much as it reflects the nature of support for arts focusedspaces and planning developed in lock step with the attached program planning document (attached).
The plan also has space for leaning communities which are clusters of classrooms around acollaboration space (as indicated on the plan).
c:\users\doma.reimer\appdataUocal\rnicrosoft\q,indows\temporary ,ntemet files\content.outlook\qigbwjml\cedar elernentary.doc
Staff has developed the plan to an openingcapacity, approximately, to the District enrolments provided
by Learning Services. There is further growth available in the building by altering additional spaces.
There is also the ability to use portables. Staff, at this time, have no plans to relocate the four portables
that currently at Cedar.
RECOMMBNDATION:
Staff recommend the following:
That the Business Committee recommends to the Board of the following:
l. That the program planning document be development;
2. That the plan for the conversion, as endorsed for frr lopment; and
3. That the music room, art room and a foodsclassrooms in support of the
divisions)
c:\users\donna.reimer\appdata\local\microsoft\windows\temporary intemet files\content.outlook\qi9bwjml\cedar elementary.doc