cedric price.the critic reyner banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector...

8

Upload: others

Post on 23-Mar-2020

3 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 2: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 3: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 4: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 5: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 6: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 7: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent
Page 8: Cedric Price.The critic Reyner Banham approv- ingly compared it to a "gigantic erector set".7 In a conventional architectural sense, Fun Palace had no intrin- sic meaning or permanent