celia caust-ellenbogen hci-psar project surveyor optimizing pastperfect for archival description
TRANSCRIPT
Item vs. Collection
All images from http://openclipart.org
Dear John:
Yours, Chas.
Dear Chas:
Yours, John.
Dear Chas:
Yours, John.
1. Provenance and Original Order2. Hierarchical Arrangement and Description3. Metadata Standards
Key Concepts for Archival Description
Provenance and Original Order
Dear John:
Yours, Chas.
Dear Chas:
Yours, John.
Dear Chas:
Yours, John.
Provenance: keep documents grouped into collections by creator
Original order: respect original order established by creator [note: rule doesn’t extend to original DISorder]
Hierarchical Organization and Description
Series I. Correspondence Subseries A. Personal correspondence
[Note: Letters are arranged in chronological order] Subseries B. Business correspondence
[Note: Letters are arranged in alphabetical order by sender]
Series II. Photographs Subseries A. Family photographs Subseries B. Nature photographs
Folder 1. Wissahickon Creek photographs Folder 2. Photographs of birds Folder 3. Garden photographs
Important for Archival DescriptionImportant for Archival Description
Recommended Additional MetadataRecommended Additional Metadata
Collection number/IDName of repositoryTitle of collectionDates of collectionExtent (size) of
collectionName of creatorScope and contents noteConditions governing
accessLanguage of materials
Source of acquisitionBiographical/historical
note Subjects (“access points"
or keywords and names)Shelf locationRelated archival
materialsOther finding aidsCatalogerCondition (private)
Metadata: “Data About Data”
ProsPros ConsCons
Good for museum/item description
Unified catalogLoans, development,
other modules built inWidely used by small
history orgs and approved by AASLH
Easy add-on digital exhibition module
Not ideal for archival description
Relatively inexpensive, but not free: $870 , or discounted to $696 for AASLH members ($115 to join AASLH)
PastPerfect Pros and Cons
Start by creating a record for the COLLECTION as a whole!
Adding lower-level description is optional depending on the complexity
and importance of the collection
In archival description...Collection is King
Lower-level description is not necessary, but it is recommended for complex and/or important
collections
Lower-Level Description
Container ListContainer List Linked RecordsLinked Records
Simple to usePrinted report is
more straightforward
Only allows one level of hierarchy
Limited metadata (description) options
More complicatedPrinted report can
be confusing
Unlimited hierarchy levels
As many metadata options as at collection level
Lower-Level Description in PastPerfect
Word-ProcessorWord-Processor Archivists’ ToolkitArchivists’ Toolkit
You’re already an expert
Already set-upFree to format however
you would likeUnlimited hierarchy
and metadata possibleEasy to post online but
not on PACSCL website
Easy to use once you get the hang of it
Set-up may require IT assistance
Proper format built-inUnlimited hierarchy
and metadata possible
Generates file type for PACSCL website
Nuclear Option
Two hierarchy levels Minimal description at lower levels
Comfortable, but not expert with PastPerfect
Container List
More than two hierarchy levels Maximal description at lower levels
Expert with PastPerfect
Linked Records
General Pointers for Linked Records
Stay in the Archives CatalogRecommend multi-part Object ID
(collection=PM.01; series=PM.01.A; etc.)Enter the unit level (e.g., "Series," "Sub-series,"
"File") as object nameDon’t repeat metadata info that already exists at
higher level (such as Language, Creator, etc.)Fill in the Collection name at the top of the
screen; this will make it easier to use the browse view
You need to create lower level records and link UP through the hierarchy
Archival Description with PastPerfect
Witt, Betsy S., Jennifer C. Whitfield, and Adam J. Stepansky. PastPerfect Software for Museum Collections, Version 5 User’s Guide, 3rd edition. PastPerfect Software, Inc., 2011. http://www.museumsoftware.com/userguide.shtml.
University of Maryland, Baltimore County Special Collections, Albin O. Kuhn Library & Gallery. Archives Processing Manual: Description. 2010. https://wiki.umbc.edu/download/attachments/11437110/UMBCProcessing_Description.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1279567785000.
General Archival Description
Kathleen D. Roe, Arranging and Describing Archives and Manuscripts (Archival Fundamentals Series II; Chicago: Society of American Archivists, 2005)
David W. Carmicheal, Organizing Archival Records: A Practical Method of Arrangement & Description for Small Archives (2nd edition; Walnut Creek, CA: AltaMira Press, 2004)
Yale University-Beinecke Rare Book and Manuscript Library, Archival Processing Manual (1997; http://www.library.yale.edu/beinecke/manuscript/process/index.html).
Archivists’ Toolkit
http://www.archiviststoolkit.org/ Using AT: Holly Mengel and Courtney Smerz,
Hidden Collections Processing Project Guide to the Archivists’ Toolkit (http://clir.pacscl.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/PACSCL_Archivists_Toolkit_Guide.pdf)
Installing AT: Holly Mengel and Courtney Smerz, Installing the Archivists’ Toolkit and MySQL and Connecting the Two (http://clir.pacscl.org/wp-content/uploads/2009/07/install_MySQL_AT.pdf
Stay tuned for ArchivesSpace: www.archivesspace.org
CELIA CAUST-ELLENBOGENProject Surveyor
Hidden Collections Initiative for Pennsylvania Small Archival Repositories
Historical Society of [email protected]://www.hsp.org/hcipsar
Optimizing PastPerfect for Archival Description