cell membrane (target of rf) signal transduction biochemical response millisecondssecondsminutes...
TRANSCRIPT
Cell Membrane
(Target Of RF)
SignalTransduction
BiochemicalResponse
milliseconds seconds minutes
Time to SensePresence of RF
Time to DetermineCoherence
of RF
Time to Interpret & Induce
Biochemical Protective Responses
The Biological Mechanism
The Nature of the Solution
• Develop a nano-technology that would stop the biological effects from occurring at the cell-membrane level
• If the biological effects did not occur, then there would be no consequent health effects
• The theoretical solution had been studied and developed as the Noise Field Principle
The Noise Field Principle
• Information carrying signal in wireless communication
• The constant repetitive
pattern triggers biological protective responses
• Protective responses lead to disease
• Random ELF or “noise field”
• Random fields do not induce protective biological responses and thus do not lead to disease
• The “Protection-effect”: Superimposing a random noise field on a bio-effecting field miti- gates the induced biological effects.
Confirmation that “Noise Field” Technology Inhibits Dangerous Biological Responses
Catholic University
of America
Columbia University
University of Washington (Seattle)
University of Western Ontario (Canada)
Aarhus University (Denmark)
Inhibited Enhanced Cell Proliferation Inhibited Enhanced
Gene Expression
Inhibited Reduction inBrain Enzyme Activity
Inhibited Enhanced Growth Enzyme Activity, Stress Protein Levels,and Embryo Abnormalities
Inhibited Memory Loss in RatsInhibited EMF Induced DNA Strand Breaks**
Example with Genetic Damage
• Genetic damage leads to the development of tumors
• Dr. Henry Lai has published studies on the Noise Field effect as it relates to DNA damage
• The technique he used was the Comet Assay
CELL PHONE-INDUCEDDNA DAMAGE - COMET ASSAY
1. Rats are exposed to RF radiation
2. DNA repair mechanisms are disrupted resulting in formation of DNA fragments
4. DNA is stained and visualized
3. Electric field is applied to DNA to see migration patterns, damaged DNA produces a “comet tail”
The “Noise Field” stopped the damage
RF exposed cells
DNA Patterns
RF exposed cellsPlus Noise Field
Unexposed cells
2 hour exposure to cell phone radiation
Lai et. al. University of Washington
Other Inhibition Effects of Applied “Noise Field”
Laboratory Model Bio-Marker EMF Effect
Catholic U.
Catholic U.
Catholic U.
Catholic U.
Catholic U.
W. Ontario U.
Columbia U.
Columbia U.
Columbia U.
Aarhus U.
Zhejiang U.
Zhejiang U.
Murine cells
Human lymphoma
Chick embryos
Chick embryos
Chick embryos
Human leukemia
Breast cancer
Brain cells
Human amniocytes
Lung cells
Lung cells
Chick embryos
ODC
ODC
ODC
Abnormalities
Nucleotidase
Stress proteins
C-myc
Stress proteins
Dopamine
Proliferation
Receptor clusters
Phosphorylation
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Increase
Decrease
Decrease
Zhejiang U. Murine fibroblasts Gap junctions Decrease
Development of the MRET
• The basis for the technology
• Fractal geometry
• EMR induced systematic stress on polymer (Piezoelectric Effect)
• Induce “noise field” as result of systematic Piezoelectric Effect
THE FRACTAL MATRIX CHARACTERISTICS THE FRACTAL MATRIX CHARACTERISTICS OF MRET –Chip POLYMER MATERIALOF MRET –Chip POLYMER MATERIAL
1 MRET –Chip
material is a fractal matrix composed of nano-circles.
External electromagnetic radiation generates electric current in nano-circles.
It is a source of MRET low frequency signals beneficial for living cells
Superposition Principle of Electromagnetic Superposition Principle of Electromagnetic OscillationsOscillations
Low-frequency
Microwave radiation – high frequency band in the range of 800 MHz – 1.3 GHz;
Electromagnetic signals generated by MRET-chip volumetric fractal matrix – low frequency band in the range of approximately 5 Hz – 25 Hz;
When a number of high frequency and low frequency waves are collocated and superimposed the total wave displacement is the algebraic sum of the displacements of individual waves.
Resulting frequency patterns can resonate with cellular structures and at the same time they are incoherent to cellular membrane “stress responsive mechanism”.
High-frequency
High-frequency Low-frequency Superimposed
Wilson, B.W., Morris, J.E., Flanagan, R., Anderson, L.E. “Evidence of an effect of ELF electromagnetic fields on human pineal gland function,” Journal of Pineal Research, 1990, 9(4): 259-269
Substantiation of the Product
• SAR Tests• Live Blood Cell Analysis• Blood Flow Analysis• VibraImage Test• EEG Tests• Multiple Biological Tests• High-Voltage Photography
– At this point, I would add some of the substantiation slides as decided by Dr. Smirnoff– Dr. Smirnov should talk about his personal story – how he came to do this work etc.– Save the rest for Q & A
The Effect of MRET Polymer The Effect of MRET Polymer Compound on SAR Values of RF Compound on SAR Values of RF
PhonesPhones
• Test was conducted at RF Exposure Laboratory, Escondido, California in June – July of 2006.
• Test includes measurement of experimental points inside the “phantom head” for three different models of RF phones functioning at 835 MHz and 1900 MHz respectfully (252 points were measured for each RF phone with and without application of MRET polymer compound).
• The APREL Laboratories ALSAS system with a dosimetric E-field probe E-020 was used for the measurements.
““High Impact Area” Area Scan DiagramsHigh Impact Area” Area Scan Diagrams
• The application of MRET polymer to RF phones does not significantly affect the air measurements of RF phone signals and subsequently does not lead to any significant distortion of transmitted RF signals.
• The incorporation of MRET polymer material in the RF phones shows that “High Impact Areas” remained in the same location as without the MRET polymer and their amplitudes decreased in 90% of data points.
• The incorporation of MRET polymeric material in the RF phones leads to the reduction of the majority of SAR values. SAR values in this experiment were reduced by up to 29.0%
Without MRET polymer material With MRET polymer material
BLOOD TESTS RESULTSBLOOD TESTS RESULTS
• The blood tests were conducted at the laboratory of Cedars-Sinai Medical Center in Los Angeles.
• Tests were conducted on 22 blood samples. Each sample was split into three groups.
• One group was a control group and two others were exposed to EMR of computer display at the distance of 15” for one hour period of time with MRET-Chip protection and without MRET-Chip protection respectively.
• After exposure to EMR all three groups of blood samples were tested on Cell-dyn 1600 specimen equipment. The results were compared with the control group.
• The results are statistically valid, p < 0.01
BLOOD FLOW ANALYSISBLOOD FLOW ANALYSIS
• Blood Flow Analyzer Test (Micro-sonar System) conducted by Gabriel Inoue, Tokyo, Japan.
The most informative parameters of the Blood Flow diagrams are the Peak Values of the blood flow speed (maximum and minimum values). This test shows that after the 20 minutes of exposure of the human subject to the mobile phone radiation the blood flow rate “jumped” from the average range of 1 cm/sec – 6.6 cm/sec to the much higher average range of 0 cm/sec – 14.4 cm/sec. The substantial alteration in the range of the blood flow pulsation can negatively affect the function and plasticity of the blood circulatory system. For reference, the smoking of one cigarette leads to the increase of the blood flow rate to 0 cm/sec – 21.0 cm/sec.
• The installation of MRET Chip chip on the mobile phone dramatically changed the physiological effect of the mobile phone radiation on the human subject. The blood flow rate fluctuates from (control) 1.0 cm/sec – 6.6 cm/sec to the range of 1.0 cm/sec – 5.8 cm/sec.
Blood Flow diagram before the exposure
to mobile phone radiation
Blood Flow diagram after the 20 minutes of exposure
without MRET Chip
Blood Flow diagram after the 20 minutes of exposure
with MRET Chip
VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipChip
• This research was conducted at Elsys Corp. in St. Petersburg, Russia. It was designed to investigate whether microwave (MW) radiation of mobile phone can induce changes in the human’s physiological state.
• This research included the testing of MRET-Chip (United States Patent No. 6,369,399 B1) and three other competitive neutralizers: made in Japan (JP), made in Russia (RU), and made in Taiwan (TW), in order to determine their effects as protective devices against MW radiation negative physiological effects.
• MW effects were studied on mobile phone Nokia, model 3310 operating in the frequency range of 895-917MHz, with power output in the range of 0.002–2W, and SAR value less than 5.4mW/kg.
VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip
The image of a subject in “FM” mode before and after 5 minutes exposure of the human subject to the
mobile phone radiation in talk mode without MRET-Chip.
The image of a subject in “FM” mode before and after 5 minutes exposure of the human
subject to the mobile radiation in talk mode with MRET-Chip.
VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip
• The comparison of VibraImage method of measurement of the human body frequencies with EEG testing methodology shows direct correlation between the brain waves and the body micro-vibration frequencies.
• The histograms show the difference in the Frequency Distributions of human body vibrations before and after the exposure of the human subject to the mobile phone radiation in talk mode without protection.
• It is possible to notice that the installation of MRET-Chip on the mobile phone makes the difference almost indistinguishable.
“FM” mode: the histograms of human body Frequency Distribution before (red diagram) and after (blue diagram) 5 minutes exposure to the mobile
phone in talk mode without MRET-Chip
“FM” mode: the histograms of human body Frequency Distribution before (red diagram) and after (blue diagram) 5 minutes exposure to the mobile phone in talk mode
with MRET-Chip.
VIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-ChipVIBRAIMAGE TEST FOR MRET-Chip Comparing to the exposure to the mobile
phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Mean Values of Frequencies and of the Widths of Frequency Range, and consequently the level of changes of physiological state of human body. Top diagram shows that the exposure to the mobile phone induced 10.3% average level of changes in the Mean Values of Frequencies. Comparing to the exposure to mobile phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Mean Value of Frequencies. MRET-Chip reduced the average level of changes by 46% (from 10.3% to 5.6%).
• Bottom diagram shows that the exposure to the mobile phone induced 9.2% average level of changes in the Width of Frequency Range. Comparing to the exposure to the mobile phone without any neutralizer, MRET-Chip significantly reduced the level of changes of the Width of the Frequency Range. MRET-Chip reduced the average level of changes by 34%. The results are statistically significant (p<0.001).
Mean Values of ΔMVF Calculated for 10 Tested Subjects
Mean Values of ΔWFR Calculated for 10 Tested Subjects
EEG TESTS RESULTSEEG TESTS RESULTS
• The EEG tests were conducted at the laboratory of SA Biomedical Instrumentation Co., California. These tests were conducted on the human subject introduced to the influence of electromagnetic radiation generated by cellular phone with MRET-Chip protection and without MRET-Chip protection respectively.
• The cellular phone was located in standard operating position at the right side of a head. The head of the human subject was covered with a standard Electro-cap E1-L connected with a four channel SAI Bioelectric Amplifier that includes Analog Processor and Anti-aliasing Filters. The physiological data were provided from the following electrodes: C4, Fz, F4, and T4 .
MRET-Chip
MRET-Chip
HIGH-VOLTAGE HIGH-VOLTAGE PHOTOGRAPHY TEST ON PHOTOGRAPHY TEST ON
PLANT LEAVESPLANT LEAVES
• The living cells produce these luminous fringes via a physical process known as cold emission of electrons.
• The solid image of a leaf not exposed to computer display radiation means that all cells of the leaf are alive and function properly.
• The image of a leaf exposed to EMR without any protection dramatically reduced. Only about 40% of the cells survived.
• The image of a leaf exposed to EMR with MRET-Chip protection shows that about 90% of the cells survived.
• It proves that MRET-Chip neutralizes the harmful effect of EMR on living organisms.
MRET-Chip Technology Credentials• US Patent No. 6369399, Granted on April 2002 by USPTO “Electromagnetic
Radiation Shielding Material and Device”
• MRET-Chip Technology Research Validations: Cedar-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles SI Biomedical Instrumentation Co., San Diego Tex Chu Corp. Laboratory, Taipei, Taiwan RF Exposure Laboratory, California Elsys Scientific Corp., S. Petersburg, Russia Elixir Health Ltd. , Singapore
• Scientific Publications: Explore Magazine USA. RSO magazine (Radiation Safety Associates), USA.
Abstract, The First Asian and Oceanic Congress for Radiation Protection (AOCRP-1), Korea.
Abstract, Asia-Pacific EMF Conference, Thailand Abstract, Biological Effects of EMFs 3rd International Conference, Greece Abstract, 26th Annual Conference of Bioelectromagnetics Society,
USA