cellular handout
TRANSCRIPT
Cellular Systems
Mobile CommunicationsCellular Systems
Wen-Shen Wuen
Trans. Wireless Technology LaboratoryNational Chiao Tung University
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 1
Outline Cellular Systems
Outline
1 Cellular System Fundamentals
2 Frequency Reuse
3 Interference and System Capacity
4 Trunking and Grade of Services
5 Improving Coverage and Capacity in Cellular Systems
6 Channel Assignment Strategies
7 Handoff Strategies
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 2
Cellular System Fundamentals Cellular Systems
Introdcution
Early mobile radio systems:
Cover a large area by using a single, high powered transmitterwith an antenna mounted on a tall tower.
No frequency reuse, no interference
Limited user capacity
Cellular concept:
Based on power fall off with distance of signal propagation andreuse the same channel frequency at spatially separatedlocations
Sovling problem of spectral congestion and user capacity
Replacing a single, high power transmitter (large cell) withmany low power transmitters (small cells)
Available channels can be reused as many times as necessaryso long as the co-channel interference is kept below acceptablelevels
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 4
Cellular System Fundamentals Cellular Systems
Cellular System
Each cell is assigned to a unique channel set, Cn
Adjacent cells: cells assigned to a different channel sets
Co-channel cells: cells using the same channel sets
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 5
Cellular System Fundamentals Cellular Systems
Tesselating Cell Shapes
To approximate the contours of constant received poweraround the base station
Hexagonal cells:
Having largest area for a given distance between the center of apolygon and its farthest perimeter pointsApproximating a circular radiation pattern for an omnidirectionalbase station antenna and free space propagation
Diamond cells: better approximating contours of constantpower in modern urban microcells
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 6
Frequency Reuse Cellular Systems
Frequency Reuse
S: total number of duplex channels available for use
k: number of channels assigned to a cell (k < S)
N: number of cells sharing the S duplex channels
S = kN (1)
Cluster: a group of N cells use the complete set of availablefrequencies
C: the total number of duplex channels with frequency reuse
M: number of replica of a cluster
C = MkN = MS (2)
Cluster size: N is typically 4, 7 or 12 for hexagonal cell shape.
Frequency reuse factor: 1/N
For the same cell size at a given area, N ↓⇒ M ↑⇒ C ↑Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 8
Frequency Reuse Cellular Systems
Various Cluster Sizes for Hexagonal Cells
Cluster sizes:
4-cell reuse
7-cell reuse
12-cell reuse
19-cell reuse
N-cell reuse
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 9
Frequency Reuse Cellular Systems
Locating Co-Channel Cells in Hexagonal Cells
Example: N = 19, i = 3, j = 2
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 10
Frequency Reuse Cellular Systems
Reuse Distance
The distance between co-channel (frequency reuse) cells
Origin: (0,0)
Nearest co-channel locationP: (i, j)
Reuse Distance, D
D = p3R
√i2 + ij+ j2 (3)
= Rp
3N (4)
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 11
Frequency Reuse Cellular Systems
Number of Cells Per Cluster
Number of cells per cluster, N
N = Acluster
Acell= 3
p3x2/2
3p
3R2/2=
p3D2/2
3p
3R2/2
= 1
3
(D
R
)2
= 1
3
(3R2
(i2 + ij+ j2
)R2
)= i2 + ij+ j2 (5)
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 12
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Interference
Major limiting factor in the performance and major bottleneckin increasing capacity
Sources of interference:
anothr mobile in the same cella call in progress in a neighboring cellother base station operating in the same frequency bandany noncellular system which leaks energy into the cellularfrequency band
Interference effects:
Cross talk: interference on voice channelsMissed and blacked calls: interference on control channels
System-generated cellular interference
Co-channel interferenceAdjacent channel interference
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 14
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Co-channel Interference
Cannot be combated by simply increasing transmitter power
To reduce, co-channel cells must be separated by a minimumdistance to provide sufficient isolation
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 15
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Co-channel Interference, cont’d
Assume
the size of each cell is the samebase stations transmit the same power
⇒ co-channel interference ratio is independent of TX power andis a function of the radius of the cell, R, and the distancebetween centers of nearest co-channel cells, D.
Co-channel reuse ratio, Q
Q ,D
R=p
3N (6)
Q ↑⇒ spatial separation of co-channel cells ↑⇒ co-channelinterference ↓Q ↓⇒ N ↓⇒ M ↑⇒ C ↑ channel capacity ↑, but co-channelinterferece ↑
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 16
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Signal to Interference Ratio, SIR, S/I
S
I= S∑Nco
i=1 Ii
(7)
S: desired signal power from the desired stationIi: the interference power caused by the i-th interfering co-channelcell base stationDi: the distance of the i-th interferer from the mobile.
∵ Pr = P0
(d
d0
)−n
∴ Ii ∝ D−ni (8)
Assume transmit power of each base station is equal and thepath loss exponent is the same, the S
I of for a mobile at cellboundary:
S
I= R−n∑Nco
i=1 D−ni
= R−n
NcoD−n =(p
3N)n
Nco(9)
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 17
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Co-channel Interference For N=7
Consider first tier ofco-channel cells:
S
I≈ R−4
2(D−R)−4 +2(D+R)−4 +2D−4
(10)S
I≈ 1
2(Q−1)−4 +2(Q+1)−4 +2Q−4
(11)where Q = D/R and assume n = 4.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 18
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Example 1
If signal-to-interference ratio of 15 dB is required for satisfactoryforward channel performance of a cellular system, what is theco-channel reuse factor and cluster size that should be used formaximum capacity if the path loss exponent is (a) n=4, (b)n=3?Assume there are six co-channel cells in the first tier and all of themare at the same distance from the mobile.Solution:(a) Consider 7-cell reuse pattern: Q = D/R =p
3N = 4.583,S/I = (
p3N)n/Nco = 4.5834/6 = 75.3 = 18.66 dB ⇒ N = 7 can be used.
(b) Consider 7-cell reuse pattern: S/I = 4.5833/6 = 16.04 = 12.05 dB< 15 dB, therefore a larger N should be used.N = 12 ⇒ D/R = 6,S/I = 63/6 = 36 = 15.56 dB > 15 dB, therefore N = 12should be used.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 19
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Channel Planning of Wireless Systems
Typically 5% of the entire mobile spectrum is devoted to controlchannels and 95% of the spectrum is dedicated to voicechannels.
Air interface standards ensure a distinction between voice andcontrol channels and control channels are not allowed to beused as voice channels and vice versa.
Different frequency reuse strategy is applied to controlchannels to ensure greater S/I protection in control channels.
For propagation consideration, most practical CDMA systemslimits frequency reuse with f 1/f 2 cell planning.
CDMA system has a dynamic, time-varying coverage regiondepending on the instantaneous number of users on the radiochannel. ⇒ breathing cell ⇒ dynamic control of power levelsand thresholds assigned to control channels, voice channels forchanging traffic intensity
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 20
Interference and System Capacity Cellular Systems
Adjacent Channel Interference
results from imperfect receiver filters which allows nearbyfrequency to leak into the passband.
causes near-far effect, a nearby TX captures the receiver of thesubscriber.
ACI can be minimized through careful filtering and channelassignments.
Keeping frequency separation between each channel as large aspossibleAvoiding the use of adjacent channels in neighboring cell sites
For a close-in mobile (MS1) is X times as close to the BS asanother mobile (MS2) and has energy leaks to the passband,the S/I at the BS for the weak mobile (MS2) before receiverfiltering is approximately
S
I= X−n
for n = 4 ⇒ SI ≈−40 dB
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 21
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Definition of Common Terms in Trunking Theory
Set-up Time: The time required to allocated a trunked radiochannel to a requesting user.
Blocked Call (Lost Call): Call which cannot be completed at timeof request, due to congestion.
Holding Time: Average duration of a typical call. Denoted by H(in seconds).
Traffic Intensity: Measure of channel time utilization, which isthe average channel occupancy measured in Erlangs.
Load: Traffic intensity across the entire trunked radio system,measured in Erlangs.
Grade of Service (GOS): A measure of congestion specified asthe probability of a call being blocked (for Erlang B), or theprobability of a call being delayed beyond a certain amount oftime (for Erlang C).
Request Rate: The average number of call requests per unittime. Denoted by λ second−1.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 23
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Trunking Theory
Each user generates a traffic intensity of Au Erlangs:
Au =λH
The total offered traffic intensity A for a system containing Uusers:
A = UAu
In a C channel trunked system, if the traffic is equallydistributed, the traffic i ntensity per channel, Ac:
Ac = UAu/C
Erlang: the amount of traffic intensity carried by a channel thatis completely occupied (1 Erlang = 1 call-hour / hour).
Busy hour traffic, Ab = call/busy hour × mean call holding time.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 24
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Example 2
Call established at 2 am between a central computer and a dataterminal. Assuming a continuous connection and data transferred at34 kbit/s what is the traffic if the call is terminated at 2:45am?Solution:Traffic=(1 call)×(45 min)×(1 hour / 60 min) =0.75 Erlangs
Example 3
A group of 20 subscribers generate 50 calls with an average holdingtime of 3 minutes, what is the average traffic per subscriber?Solution:Traffic=(50 calls)×(3min)×(1 hour/60 min)=2.5 Erlangs2.5/20=0.125 Erlangs per subscriber.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 25
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Erlang B: Blocked Calls Cleared
p [blocked] =AC
C!∑Ck=0
Ak
k!
=GOS
where C: the number of trunked channels offered by a trunked radiosystem; A: the total offered traffic.Assumptions of Erlang B:
There are memoryless arrivals of requests.
The probability of a user occupying a channel is exponentiallydistributed.
There are a finite number of channels available in the trunkingpool.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 26
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
GOS of an Erlang B System
Trunking efficiency: a meaure of the number of users which can beoffered a particular GOS with a particular configuration of fixedchannels.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 27
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Erlang B Chart
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 28
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Erlang C: Blocked Calls Delayed
Probability of a call not having immediate access to a channeland being queued:
p [delay> 0] =AC
C!
AC +C!(1− A
C
)∑C−1k=0
Ak
k!
=GOS
The probability that the delayed call is forced to wait more thant second:
p [delay> t] = p [delay> 0]p [delay> t|delay> 0]
= p [delay> 0]exp
(− (C −A)t
H
)(12)
Average delay D for all calls in a queued system
D = p [delay> 0]H
C −A
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 29
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Erlang C Chart
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 30
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Example 4
How many users can be supported for 0.5% blocking probability forthe following number of trunked channels in a blocked calls clearsystem? (a) 1, (b) 5, (c) 10, (d) 20, (e) 100. Assume each usergenerate 0.1 Erlangs of traffic.Solution:(a) C = 1,Au = 0.1,GOS = 0.005, from the chart,A = 0.005 ⇒ U = A/Au = 0.005/0.1 = 0.05 users(b) C = 5,Au = 0.1,GOS = 0.005, from the chart,A = 1.13 ⇒ U = A/Au = 1.13/0.1 ' 11 users(c) C = 10,Au = 0.1,GOS = 0.005, from the chart,A = 3.96 ⇒ U = A/Au = 3.96/0.1 ' 39 users(d) C = 20,Au = 0.1,GOS = 0.005, from the chart,A = 11.1 ⇒ U = A/Au = 11.1/0.1 ' 111 users(e) C = 100,Au = 0.1,GOS = 0.005, from the chart,A = 80.9 ⇒ U = A/Au = 80.9/0.1 ' 809 users
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 31
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Example 5
Trunked mobile networks A, B, and C provide cellular services in an urbanarea with 2 million residents. The (no. of cells, no. channels/cell) for thethree providers are (394,19), (98,57) and (49,100). Find the number ofusers that can be supported at 2% blocking if each user averages twocalls/hour at an average call duration of 3 min. Find the percentage marketpenetration for each provider.Solution:System A: GOS = 0.02,C = 19, Au =λH = 2(3/60) = 0.1 Erlangs. For GOS = 0.02and C = 19 ⇒ A = 12 Erlangs U = A/Au = 12/0.1 = 120 ⇒total number of subscribers is 120×394 = 47289System B: GOS = 0.02,C = 57, Au =λH = 2(3/60) = 0.1 Erlangs. For GOS = 0.02and C = 57 ⇒ A = 45 Erlangs U = A/Au = 45/0.1 = 450 ⇒total number of subscribers is 450×98 = 44100System C: GOS = 0.02,C = 100, Au =λH = 2(3/60) = 0.1 Erlangs. For GOS = 0.02and C = 100 ⇒ A = 88 Erlangs U = A/Au = 88/0.1 = 880 ⇒total number of subscribers is 880×49 = 43120Market penetration: A: 47280/2,000,000=2.36%; B:44100/2,000,000=2.205%;C: 43120/2,000,000=2.156%
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 32
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Example 6
Given a city area: 1300 mile2, with 7-cell reuse pattern, cell radius=4 milesand frequency spectrum: 40MHz with 60KHz channel bandwidth. AssumeGOS=2% for an Erlang B system, if the offered traffic per user is 0.03Erlangs, compute (a) the no. of cells in the service area (b) the no. ofchannels per cell (c) traffic intensity of each cell (d) the maximum carriedtraffic (e) the total no. of users can be served for the GOS (f) the no. ofmobiles per unique channel (g) the theoretical maximum no. of users thatcould be served at one time by the system.Solution:(a) Acell = 1.5
p3R2 = 2.5981×42 = 41.57 square mile. Total no. of cells
Nc = 1300/41.57 = 31 cells.(b) Total no. of channels per cell C = 40MHz/(60kHz×7) = 95 channels/cell.(c) C = 95,GOS = 0.02 ⇒ traffic intensity per cell A = 84 Erlangs/cell.(d) Maximum carried traffic=no. of cells × traffic intensity per cell =31×84 = 2604 Erlangs.(e) Traffic/user=0.03 Erlangs ⇒ Total no. of users = 2604/0.03=86800 users(f) no. of mobiles per channel= no. of users/no. of channels =86800/(40MHz/60 kHz)=130 mobiles/channel.(e) The theoretical maximum no. of served mobiles (all channels areoccupied)= C ×Nc = 95×31 = 2945 users
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 33
Trunking and Grade of Services Cellular Systems
Example 7
A hexagonal cell within a four-cell system has a radius of 1.387 km. A totalof 60 channels are used within the entire system. If the load per user is0.029 Erlangs and λ= 1 call/hour, compute the following for an Erlang Csystem which has a 5% probability of delayed call: (a) how many user persquare kilometer will the system support? (b) the probability that a delayedcall will have to wait for more than 10 seconds? (c) the probability that acall will be delayed for more than 10 seconds?Solution:Cell area=2.598× (1.387)2 = 5km2. no. of channel per cell C = 60/4 = 15channels.(a) For Erlang C of 5% probability of delay with C = 15, the trafficintensity=9.0 Erlangs.no. of users=total traffic intensity/traffic per user = 9/0.029=310 users for5 km2 or 62 users/km2
(b) H = Au/λ= 0.029hour = 104.4 second.p[delay> 10|delay] = exp(−(C −A)t/H) = exp(−(15−9)10/104.4) = 56.29% (c)p[delay> 0] = 5% = 0.05p[delay> 10] = p[delay> 0]p[delay> 10|delay] = 0.05×0.5629 = 2.81%
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 34
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Cell Splitting
Let R ↓ and keeps D/Runchanged
Pr[at old cell boundary] ∝ Pt1R−n
Pr[at new cell boundary] ∝ Pt2(R/2)−n
for n = 4
Pt2 = Pt1
16
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 36
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Cell Splitting
Example 8
Assume each BS uses 60channels and large cell radius of 1km and microcell radius of 0.5km. Find the number of channelsin a 3 km by 3 km square aroundA when (a) without the use ofmicrocells (b) the labeledmicrocells are used (c) all originalBS are replaced by microcells.Solution:(a) 5×60 = 300 (b) (5+6)×60 = 660(2.2x) (c) (5+12)×60 = 1020 (3.4x)
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 37
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Sectoring
Increasing S/I ratio, keeping cell radius R the same anddecreasing D/R ⇒ D ↓⇒ N ↓⇒ frequency reuse ↑ ⇒ cluster sizeN can be reduced because of S/I is improved.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 38
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Sectoring, cont’d
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 39
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Microcell Zone
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 40
Improving Coverage and Capacity Cellular Systems
Microcell Zone
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 41
Channel Assignment Strategies Cellular Systems
Channel Assignment Strategies
Fixed channel assignment
each cell is allocated to a predetermined set of voice channels ⇒the call is blocked is all the channels are occupied.borrowing strategy: a cell is allowed to borrow channels from aneighboring cell if all of its own channels are occupied.MSC supervises the borrowing procedure to ensure no disruptingcalls or interference with any of the calls in progress in the donorcell.
Dynamic channel assignment
the serving BS request a channel from MSC whenever a callrequest is made.following an algorithm considering the likelihood of futureblocking in the cell, the frequency of use of the candidate cell, thereuse distance of the channel and other cost functions.MSC needs to collect real-time data on channel occupancy, trafficdistribution, and radio signal strength indicator (RSSI) of allchannels on a continuous basis. ⇒ increasing storage andcomputational load on the system.
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 43
Handoff Strategies Cellular Systems
Handoff
When a mobile moves into a different cell when a conversationis in progress, the MSC automatically transfer the call to a newchannel belonging to a new BS.
Many handoff strategy prioritize handoff requests over callinitiation requests when allocating an unused channel.
Handoff threshold: a signal level slightly stronger than theminimum usable signal for acceptable voice quality.
∆= Pr,handoff −Pr,min.usable
∆ too large ⇒ unnecessary handoffs burden MSC
∆ too small ⇒ may be insufficient time to complete a handoffbefore a call is lost
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 45
Handoff Strategies Cellular Systems
Handoff Scenario at Cell Boundary
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 46
Handoff Strategies Cellular Systems
Handoff Decision
Monitor the signal level of MS for a period of time
to ensures MS is actually moving away from the serving BS.
Dwell time
The time over which a call may be maintained within a cell,without handoff, depending on propagation, interference,distance between the MS and BS, and other time varyingeffects
Monitor RSSI
BS monitors the signal strengths of all its reverse voicechannels to determined the relative location of each MS.
Locator receivers monitor the signal strength of users inneighboring cells need of handoff and report RSSI to MSC.
Mobile assisted handoff (MAHO)
MS measures the received power from the surrounding BS’sand continuously reports to the serving BS.
Faster handoff time than first generation analog system
Suited for microcellular environmentsVincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 47
Handoff Strategies Cellular Systems
Handoff Considerations
Prioritizing Handoffs
Guard channel concept: reserves a fractional of total availablechannels exclusively for handoff ⇒ reducing total carried traffic⇒ combining with dynamic channel assignment to offerefficient spectrum utilization
Queuing of handoff requests: using the finite time intervalbetween the time the received signal levels drops below thehandoff threshold and the time the call is terminated ⇒ notguarantee a zero probability of forced termination
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 48
Handoff Strategies Cellular Systems
Handoff Considerations
Umbrella cells
Cell dragging
Hard handoff
Soft handoff
Vincent W.-S. Wuen Mobile Communications 49