central cascades adaptive management partnership an intersection of state and federal organizations,...
TRANSCRIPT
CENTRAL CASCADES ADAPTIVE CENTRAL CASCADES ADAPTIVE MANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIPMANAGEMENT PARTNERSHIP
An intersection of state and federal organizations, sharing and focusing science and management resources to elevate our understanding of natural resources.
YOUNG STAND THINNING AND DIVERSITY STUDY
A management study evaluating the ecological, operational, social, and economic consequences of alternative methods of managing 30-50 year-old plantations.
TREATMENTS
Control (uncut, avg. 261 tpa) : Blue outline
Light thin (thinned to 105 tpa) : Yellow outline
Heavy thin (55 tpa) : Green outline
Light Thin with Gaps (same as light thin but with additional 0.5 acre gaps over 20% of the treatment) : Red Outline
The Young Stand Study targeted stands 35-50 years old
LIGHT THIN W/GAP TREATMENT
This treatment mimics mortality patterns of •small fires •root-rot outbreaks•Insects
Gaps planted
HEAVY THIN TREATMENT
This treatment opens the canopy dramatically allowing
•Rapid diameter growth
•More understory development
LIGHT THIN TREATMENT
This treatment is similar to a standard commercial thin.
• ~ 1/2 stems were removed
• 110 trees per acre left
MONITORING• Small Mammals pre twice; post 2 & 3, 11 & 12• Amphibians pre twice; post 11 + cover boards• Birds pre twice; post 3, 4, 5, 7, 11, 12 • Vegetation pre stand exams, post 1, 3, 5, 11 • Logging Costs post• Soil Impacts post• Snags/down wood post 2, 11• Stand Damage post• Public Perceptions post• Arthropods post 5 and 6
Chanterelle’s
MONITORING -- one year pre (1994), post 1996-7, 1999
KEY FINDING:• Chanterelle productivity significantly declined (but was
not eliminated) immediately after thinning • the level of decline was greater in the heavily thinned
stands than in those lightly thinned
NO DATA COLLECTED TO SEE IF RECOVERED OVER TIME
Chanterelle’s
1996 1997 1999 2001
MushroomsAv
g.C
hant
erel
les
per a
cre
0
100
200
300
400
Col 2 Col 2: 199 Col 2: 25 Col 2: 280 Col 2: 95 Col 2: 20 Col 2: 85 Col 2: 20 Col 2: 5 Col 2: 350 Col 2: 320 Col 2: 110
Pilz et al. 2006
www.pbase.com/ladislav/image/33934414
Short-term reductions
LOGGING DAMAGE
Compared tractor, cut-to-length, skyline, & helicopter
KEY FINDINGS: • Most typical damage was scarring
• Ground-based systems more severe
• Skyline and helicopter: larger scars, gouging, and root damage
• Damaged concentrated w/in 15 ft of skid trails / skyline corridor centerlines.
• Cut-to-length systems -- harvester caused more wounding (70%) than forwarder (30%), but forwarder scars were larger and sustained severe gouging.
Litter Dwelling Arthropods Affects of thinning complex!
• Key Findings:– Seasonal affects override treatment affects– Indirect affects on litter moisture decreases
abundance and diversity proportional to thinning
– Control vs light thin – no difference– Light thin w/gaps – no difference from heavy
PUBLIC PERCEPTIONSPost-Thin, Heavy and Light
KEY FINDINGS:
• Both Treatments - low visual impacts
met moderate scenic integrity standards
COMPACTION
• KEY FINDINGS: CABLE
– 0.5% of area was disturbed
– Compaction negligible, but some sites
-- decreased bulk density
–From tilling of dragging tops??
COMPACTION – SLASH DEPTHS
KEY FINDINGS: HARVESTER FORWARDER• 3-5 passes, compaction raised soil strength
– no further increase in compaction
• Existing OM, particularly rotten logs, cushioned and reduced compaction
• Compaction was 21% at 4” depth, 12% at 8”
• High levels of slash reduced compaction to a small extent
• There was very little change in bulk density in the middle of skid trails at 8” depth
COMPACTION
KEY FINDINGS: CUT TO LENGTH (harvester forwarder)
• Difficult to reuse old skid trails due to difference in the systems used 50 years ago
• New skid trail showed same compaction as old trails
• Bulk density increased 12%
• Over 20% oF area of compacted, still within FS guidelines
THE REST OF THE STORY…