cert audit for contractors could cost your clinic - · pdf filecert audit for contractors...
TRANSCRIPT
CERT audit for contractors could cost your clinicAudit program puts providers at risk
With so much attention on the recovery audit con-
tractors (RAC) and other new audits that could cause
rehab providers to lose money, therapy managers
sometimes overlook older programs that could have
similar effects.
It’s more likely that a program could be overlooked
when the goal of the program isn’t to review providers,
but contractors. However, when CMS established the
Medicare Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT)
program in 2003, the program had unintended con-
sequences for providers, says Nancy J. Beckley, MS,
MBA, CHC, president of Bloomingdale Consulting
Group in Brandon, FL.
Established to monitor and report the accuracy of
Medicare payments, the CERT program audits Medicare
contractors to ensure that they are reviewing and pay-
ing claims correctly. But when an error is found, the
contractors can return to the provider and request repay-
ment of the reimbursement, says Beckley. “In trying to
assess the payment error rate of contractors, the auditors
have to look at claims,” she says. “So inadvertently, rehab
claims end up getting checked and errors are found.”
CERT rundown
CMS states that it calculates the Medicare fee-for-
service error rate and estimate of improper claim pay-
ments using a methodology approved by the Office of In-
spector General.
The CERT meth-
odology includes:
Random- ➤
ly selecting a
sample of ap-
proximate-
ly 120,000
submitted
claims from all
providers
Requesting medical records from providers who ➤
submitted the claims
Reviewing the claims and medical records to ensure ➤
compliance with Medicare coverage, coding, and
billing rules
Auditors send letters to providers requesting a set num-
ber of claims (see p. 4 for a sample letter). Similar to RAC
audits or claims reviews, providers have a fixed number
of days to respond and return the specified documenta-
tion from the requested claims, says Connie Ziccarelli,
chief operating officer of Rehab Management Solutions in
Kenosha, WI.
CERT has recently established that providers no lon-
ger must fax documentation, but can now scan copies
“ In trying to assess the
payment error rate of
contractors, the auditors
have to look at claims.
So inadvertently, rehab
claims end up getting
checked and errors
are found.”
—Nancy J. Beckley,
MS, MBA, CHC
> continued on p. 2
IN THIS ISSUE
p. 4 CERT medical record requestSee a sample letter CMS may send you if your records are audited as part of the Comprehensive Error Rate Testing program.
p. 6 Dry needling Some therapists are using this treatment technique to relieve patients’ pain. Learn whether the technique is approved for PTs in your state and how to become certified.
p. 10 Therapy studies Two recent studies that point to the efficacy of PT can help you promote your practice and profession.
p. 12 BRRR coding corner Rick Gawenda, PT, answers questions about billing Medicare for VitalStim therapy and “incident to” billing.
April 2009 Vol. 14, No. 4
Page 2 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
of the charts and mail the documentation on a CD-ROM,
Beckley says. “When you’re faxing over copies of docu-
mentation, you’re looking for a lot of quality, and they
can be hard to read,” she says. “By scanning in the doc-
uments and sending over in a PDF format, you’re less
likely to have the reviewers stating errors because of il-
legibility or because they couldn’t find where you wrote
a note.”
However, unlike RAC audits and other claim reviews,
you may never receive the results of a CERT review that
you are part of because the auditors are more focused on
the contractors, says Beckley.
You will only receive a response if the contractors
return to request repayment of the reimbursement, but
at least you won’t be under the direct scrutiny of the
auditor.
CERT program < continued from p. 1
CMS publishes CERT reports quarterly, and it’s becom-
ing clear that contractors make a large portion of their
errors on rehab claims, which could shine the spotlight
even brighter on the rehab industry soon, says Beckley.
(To read the reports and learn more about the CERT pro-
gram, go to www.cms.hhs.gov/CERT.)
A rehab problem
In a 2008 CERT quarterly report, CPT code 97140 for
manual therapy was listed as one of the top 20 services
without sufficient documentation to support the claim,
says Beckley. It resulted in a 9.9% paid claims error rate
valued at $20,941,788.
The same report identified the highest paid claims
error rate of 21.2% for OT in private practice, resulting
in a projected $18 million in improper payments, with
88.9% resulting from inadequate documentation and
10.8% resulting from improper coding, says Beckley.
“Reports like that have to be a warning sign to the
industry,” says Beckley. “When RAC auditors see num-
bers like that, they may be more inclined to look specif-
ically at rehab services as part of their audits in coming
years.”
Part of the problem is that rehab isn’t the biggest
fish in the pond, so many contractors haven’t always
paid as much attention to rehab claims as others be-
cause their costs are less than fees for surgery or other
services.
But when errors are consistently found on rehab
claims—even when the errors aren’t typically fraud,
but due to a lack of complete documentation—the
claims will be examined more closely, says Beckley.
Group Publisher: Emily Sheahan, [email protected]
Associate Editor: Emily Beaver, [email protected]
Editor: Kevin Moschella, [email protected]
Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations
Nancy J. Beckley, MS, MBA, CHC PresidentBloomingdale Consulting Group Brandon, FL
Kate Brewer, PT, MBA, GCSVice President of Rehabilitation ServicesGreenfield Rehabilitation Agency Greenfield, WI
Peter ClendeninExecutive Vice PresidentNational Association for the Support of Long Term Care Alexandria, VA
Rick Gawenda, PTDirector of Rehabilitation ServicesDetroit Receiving Hospital Ypsilanti, MI
Peter R. Kovacek, MSA, PTPresident Kovacek Management Services, Inc. Harper Woods, MI
David O. Lane, PT, MHSAdministrative Director of Outpatient ServicesGaylord Hospital Wallingford, CT
Ken Mailly, PTMailly & Inglett Consulting, LLC Wayne, NJ
Christina MetzlerChief of Public AffairsAmerican Occupational Therapy Association Bethesda, MD
Angie Phillips, PTPresident and CEOImages and Associates Amarillo, TX
Lynn Steffes, PTPresidentSteffes & Associates Consulting Group New Berlin, WI
Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations (ISSN: 1089-4705 [print]; 1937-7398 [online]) is pub-lished monthly by HCPro, Inc., 200 Hoods Lane, Marblehead, MA 01945. Subscription rate: $259 per year. • Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations (BRRR), P.O. Box 1168, Marblehead, MA 01945. • Copyright © 2009 HCPro, Inc. • All rights reserved. Printed in the USA. Except where specifically encouraged, no part of this publication may be reproduced, in any form or by any means, without prior written consent of HCPro, Inc., or the Copyright Clearance Center at 978/750-8400. Please notify us immediately if you have received an unauthorized copy. • For editorial comments or questions, call 781/639-1872 or fax 781/639-2982. For renewal or subscription information, call customer service at 800/650-6787, fax 800/639-8511, or e-mail: [email protected]. • Visit our Web site at www.hcpro.com. • Occasionally, we make our subscriber list available to selected companies/vendors. If you do not wish to be included on this mailing list, please write to the marketing department at the address above. • Opinions expressed are not necessarily those of BRRR. Mention of products and services does not constitute endorsement. Advice given is general, and readers should consult professional counsel for specific legal, ethical, or clinical questions.
Editorial Advisory Board
If it’s been more than six months since you purchased
or renewed your subscription to BRRR, be sure to check
your envelope for your renewal notice or call customer
service at 800/650-6787.
Don’t miss your next issue!
April 2009 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations Page 3
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Providers can enter their provider ID number and en-
sure that CMS has their correct practice address at the
CERT Web site, www.certprovider.org. This is important be-
cause CERT is linked into the CMS provider directory.
“You’d be surprised how many therapists change loca-
tions or create a provider ID and never check to ensure
CMS has the correct address information,” says Beckley.
Because providers who bill Medicare must have their cor-
rect address on file, you risk sanctions from CMS by not
ensuring that your address is accurate, she says.
Even if you are getting reimbursed at the correct ad-
dress, you could be incorrectly listed in another loca-
tion and get in trouble. If the CERT auditors request your
charts via mail, you must respond within 30 days. If you
don’t, you are in violation of your Medicare contract.
“I’ve seen cases where the error was on CMS’ end, but
the clinic can still face some trouble,” Beckley says. “One
of my clients found out that a renal clinic was assigned the
same provider number in the system as their therapy clin-
ic, so all correspondence was going to the wrong address.”
As with the RAC audits, claims reviews, and general
good practice, it is most important to remember that good
documentation reduces stress. Payers can look at as many
charts as they want, and although it might cost you some
time to find and send them to the requester, if you know
you practice ethical therapy and take good, quality notes,
you shouldn’t worry about giving back money or facing
any more serious infractions, says Ziccarelli. n
Putting CERT to good use
Although the thought of a contractor asking for
money back is scary, especially in these trying economic
times, the CERT program isn’t all bad for providers.
For example, it makes the contractors more account-
able, says Ziccarelli. For providers who are detailed and
careful with their documentation, it helps justify the time
they spend if contractors review claims more closely and
start catching problems earlier.
Also, with all the budgetary issues CMS faces, if the
CERT program starts catching billing errors in other
medical specialties, it could help clean up the health-
care industry.
A more direct benefit is that rehab providers can learn
from the CERT program, says Beckley. By reviewing the
quarterly CERT reports, providers can see their colleagues’
mistakes and ensure that they have compliance programs
to stave off making the same mistakes.
Because it’s likely most providers will never have their
claims reviewed by the CERT program, reading about the
process and being familiar with how the CMS audit pro-
cess works could be more beneficial when the RAC audits
are in full effect or for other claims reviews, Beckley says.
For example, if you see that the CERT report has found
that claims for therapeutic exercise are commonly misre-
imbursed, you should be aware that contractors are more
likely to perform a probe review of claims with that code,
she says.
BRRR Subscriber Services Coupon Your source code: N0001
Name
Title
Organization
Address
City State ZIP
Phone Fax
E-mail address(Required for electronic subscriptions)
q Payment enclosed. q Please bill me.q Please bill my organization using PO # q Charge my: q AmEx q MasterCard q VISA q Discover
Signature(Required for authorization)
Card # Expires(Your credit card bill will reflect a charge to HCPro, the publisher of BRRR.)
q Start my subscription to BRRR immediately.
Options No. of issues Cost Shipping Total
q Electronic 12 issues $259 (BORRE) N/A
q Print & Electronic 12 issues of each $259 (BORRPE) $24.00
Sales tax (see tax information below)*
Grand total
Order online at www.hcmarketplace.com.
Be sure to enter source code N0001 at checkout!
Mail to: HCPro, P.O. Box 1168, Marblehead, MA 01945 Tel: 800/650-6787 Fax: 800/639-8511 E-mail: [email protected] Web: www.hcmarketplace.com
For discount bulk rates, call toll-free at 888/209-6554.
*Tax informationPlease include applicable sales tax. Electronic subscriptions are exempt. States that tax products and shipping and handling: CA, CO, CT, FL, GA, IL, IN, KY, LA, MA, MD, ME, MI, MN, MO, NC, NJ, NM, NY, OH, OK, PA, RI, SC, TN, TX, VA, VT, WA, WI, WV. State that taxes products only: AZ. Please include $27.00 for shipping to AK, HI, or PR.
Page 4 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
CERT letter
Under the Medicare Comprehensive Error Rate Testing (CERT) program, CMS audits Medicare contractors by reviewing
claims submitted by providers to ensure that contractors are processing claims correctly. The following is a sample letter auditors
may send to providers requesting to review claims as part of the CERT program.
April 2009 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations Page 5
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Source: CMS.
CERT letter (cont.)
Page 6 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
radiates in a distribution typical of the specific muscle
harboring the trigger point.
The aim of dry needling is to achieve a local twitch re-
sponse to release muscle tension and pain, Dommerholt
says. “The main advantage of dry needling is that it’s
truly specific in that it gets right to the source of the pain,”
he says.
Dommerholt was one of the first PTs to use dry nee-
dling in the United States and runs one of the two dry
needling certification programs in the country. “It’s the
fastest way I know to reduce a patient’s pain,” he says,
adding that dry needling can be used for several muscu-
loskeletal problems.
Common areas in which dry needling can be effective
include but are not limited to:
Neck, back, and shoulder pain ➤
Arm pain (e.g., tennis elbow, carpal tunnel, and ➤
golfer’s elbow)
Headache (e.g., migraines and tension-type headaches) ➤
Jaw pain ➤
Buttock pain ➤
Leg pain (e.g., sciatica, hamstring strains, and calf ➤
tightness/spasms)
Most patients do not feel the insertion of the needle,
Dommerholt says. The local twitch response elicits a brief
(i.e., less than one second) painful response. Some pa-
tients describe this as a little electrical shock; others feel
it more like a cramping sensation, he says.
Dry needling sessions take about 30–45 minutes, a
length of time similar to other therapy sessions. The
number of sessions is typically less than conventional
techniques, but varies greatly based on how long the pa-
tient has been dealing with the pain, says Dommerholt.
Although similar to acupuncture, dry needling is more
of a Western medicine. Many acupuncturists use dry nee-
dling as part of their practice, but PTs are not typically
trained in all the aspects of acupuncture.
From strengthening muscles to rehabilitating from
heart surgery, there are almost an endless amount of
conditions PTs can help improve. But the most common
issue patients come to a therapist for is reducing pain.
Whether the pain is from a torn hamstring, sore back,
or hip replacement, therapists have several modalities
and exercises to choose from to help patients return to a
normal life.
Most therapists treat the pain in noninvasive ways,
leaving more invasive procedures to surgeons and other
physicians. But a growing number of therapists are using
a more invasive technique to treat their patients’ pain.
The effective, but somewhat controversial, technique
of dry needling is an option therapists are beginning to
learn more about and are considering incorporating as
part of their practice.
Although currently only legal for PTs to perform in
11 states (Alabama, Colorado, Georgia, Maryland, New
Hampshire, New Mexico, Ohio, Pennsylvania, South
Carolina, Texas, and Virginia), growing evidence indi-
cates dry needling can be a fast, effective way to treat
any patient in which the pain is a result of a trigger
point.
Dry needling explained
Dry needling certainly isn’t for every PT, says Jan
Dommerholt, PT, DPT, MPS, DAAPM, president and
PT at Bethesda (MD) Physiocare, Inc. It involves using
needles to penetrate the skin and palpate trigger points
of pain, resetting pain sensors.
The term “trigger point” refers to pain related to a
discrete, irritable point in skeletal muscle or fascia, not
caused by acute local trauma, inflammation, degenera-
tion, neoplasm, or infection.
The painful point can be felt as a tumor or band in the
muscle, and a twitch response can be elicited on stimu-
lation of the trigger point. Palpation of the trigger point
reproduces the patient’s complaint of pain, and the pain
Dry needling may end your patients’ painTreatment rising in popularity as states start to allow use
April 2009 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations Page 7
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
University in Atlanta is one of the first schools to begin
educating students about dry needling, thus letting stu-
dents know it is an option.
Adding dry needling to your practice
If you live in one of the 11 states where dry needling
is already allowed as part of your practice act, it won’t
take much to start incorporating dry needling into your
regular practice.
You can start by taking one of the accredited dry nee-
dling courses as though you were going to add any other
specialty service to your practice, says Adler. “I had been
practicing physical therapy for 25 years and just always
felt I could help my patients more if I could get deeper,”
she says. “I heard about dry needling about five years
ago, took the course, and it immediately became one of
the most popular services I provided.”
Dry needling became so popular at Adler’s practice
that she’s had to leave most of the more common PT ser-
vices to her other therapists. “I started out treating one
patient with dry needling a week, but now I have five to
10 patients a day coming in for dry needling treatment,”
she says.
Once you’re certified in the technique, the costs of
adding dry needling to your practice are minor, says
Dommerholt.
To start, you will need:
Several different-sized needles (needles typically cost ➤
about $12 per 100 needles)
A place to properly dispose of the needles (state ➤
laws vary)
Cotton balls and bandages for the rare times the ➤
patient bleeds
Rubber gloves ➤
Other than the items listed above, you don’t have to
change much about your practice, says Dommerholt.
Dry needling can be performed in regular treatment
rooms, and it shouldn’t affect your insurance status with
payers or malpractice insurance. Most insurers reimburse
The reason dry needling is still considered controver-
sial in some facets of the world of therapy is that most
PTs are not accustomed to using needles as part of their
practice.
But most state practice acts don’t specifically state
that PTs can’t use needles, allowing therapists to peti-
tion to include dry needling in their practice act. On-
ly some states (i.e., California, Nevada, Tennessee, and
Florida) have specifically stated that dry needling is not
allowed by PTs.
Physicians are allowed to perform dry needling in any
state, although Dommerholt says he believes PTs are the
most appropriate clinicians to perform the treatment be-
cause PTs are more familiar with performing palpations
and know where the muscle trigger points are.
“Learning to insert the needle is minor,” says Tracey
Adler, DPT, owner and director of Orthopedic Physical
Therapy, Inc., in Richmond, VA. “Learning to palpate the
trigger point and where to put the needle is what makes
it effective.”
Getting educated
Although dry needling has become much more com-
mon worldwide in the past 10 years, it still occupies a
small niche in the United States. Part of that reason is
because there are only two places to become certified
in the technique—Dommerholt’s Myopain Seminars
(www.myopainseminars.com) based in Atlanta and Glob-
al Education of Manual Therapies (www.gemtinfo.com) in
Brighton, CO.
Both programs offer intensive training on the tech-
niques of dry needling. The skills can be taught in a few
days, but it takes a lot of time and practice to perfect the
technique, says Adler. “If you can get past inserting a
needle into patients, the general concept isn’t too differ-
ent than manual therapy,” she says. “It’s about finding
the source of the pain and going right at it. But just like
any technique, the success depends on your skill level.”
One reason why dry needling may not have yet taken
off in the United States is that most PT schools are not
teaching students about the technique. Georgia State > continued on p. 8
Page 8 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
But in most cases, getting approval will require pro-
viding evidence that it works and showing that thera-
pists are qualified.
Dommerholt says although he doesn’t start the battle
in each state, he’s willing to testify and provide the evi-
dence if there are therapists who want to make the push
to legalize dry needling by PTs in a specific state.
The fight often comes from physician boards who feel
they are the only ones qualified to penetrate the skin,
but as more states allow dry needling, that argument be-
comes more difficult to make, Dommerholt says. (See
“Dry needling guidance” on p. 9 for guidance Colorado
created on the issue.)
Creating a balance
It’s important to note that dry needling alone will not
return a patient to full strength, says Dommerholt. Dry
needling alleviates the pain that makes functioning diffi-
cult for many patients.
Adler says dry needling, combined with more conven-
tional therapy exercises and modalities, has been work-
ing well for her during the past five years.
“I typically perform dry needling on a patient once a
week, and they see another therapist for manual thera-
py or other therapy sessions another one or two times a
week,” she says.
The dry needling allows the patient to forget about the
pain and focus on performing the exercises that will be-
gin to heal the muscle or other injury, Adler says.
Dommerholt says he performs dry needling and man-
ual therapy on many of his patients, but he does dry nee-
dling on 90% of his patients because it’s the quickest,
most effective way he knows to treat pain.
“I know it’s still not widely accepted across the indus-
try,” says Adler. “But I believe it’s because some people
are scared of change, and using needles in an invasive
way is a major change for some therapists. However,
you can’t grow in your profession if you don’t take cal-
culated risks.” n
for dry needling under its own code or the manual thera-
py code (CPT code 97140), he says.
However, some therapists, such as Adler, don’t feel
comfortable billing for dry needling under the manual
therapy code because it doesn’t fit the normal definition.
Adler makes it a cash-based service, charging the fee
she would charge for any therapy service to a patient
without insurance. “I never have problems getting pa-
tients to pay cash for dry needling because they see its
effectiveness,” she says. “It’s something you can tell is
working after one or two treatments, so we don’t contin-
ue with it if the patient isn’t feeling better quickly.”
But Dommerholt says he and many of the other
therapists who use dry needling bill it under manual
therapy, provide the proper documentation, and don’t
get denied.
As for malpractice insurance, Adler says hers nev-
er increased because the risks are no greater than most
other techniques, with bruising as the biggest side effect
and the only dangerous, yet uncommon, side effect a
collapsed lung.
Adding dry needling to your practice can also give
you a marketing advantage similar to adding any other
specialty. Because there are only about 350 therapists
licensed to perform dry needling in the United States,
being able to offer the service can drive in new clientele
and offer current patients another option for their care,
says Dommerholt.
“It changed my practice drastically,” says Adler. “In-
stead of physician referrals now, I get most of my refer-
rals from other patients. I advertised the service at first,
but word spread quickly that patients were really seeing
results.”
For therapists in states where dry needling has yet to
be approved but hasn’t been denied, sometimes getting
approval is as easy as writing to your state board, says
Dommerholt. “There’s been a couple states where all it
took was a therapist asking for permission to perform dry
needling for it to be allowed,” he says.
Dry needling < continued from p. 7
April 2009 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations Page 9
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Dry needling guidance
Thirty-nine other states have not yet to allowed PTs to use
dry needling. Of those states, four (California, Nevada, Ten-
nessee, and Florida) have expressly stated that PTs may not
perform the dry needling technique.
If your state has not yet approved dry needling, but has
not specifically denied PTs from using it, writing to your state
board may help PTs in your state get permission to use the
technique. When writing to your state board, using guid-
ance from other states that have approved dry needling for
PTs may help you formulate an argument.
In February 2008, Virginia passed guidance on the use of
dry needling by PTs. If you’re interested in getting dry nee-
dling approved in your state, consider the Virginia guidance
below to explain why PTs should be able to use dry needling
to help patients relieve pain. Upon recommendation from the
Task Force on Dry Needling, the board voted that dry nee-
dling is within the scope of practice of PT, but should only be
practiced under the following conditions:
Dry needling is not an entry-level skill, but an advanced ➤
procedure that requires additional training.
A PT using dry needling must complete at least 54 hours ➤
of post professional training, including providing evi-
dence of meeting expected competencies that include
demonstration of cognitive and psychomotor knowl-
edge and skills.
The licensed PT bears the burden of proof of sufficient ➤
education and training to ensure competence with the
treatment or intervention.
Dry needling is an invasive procedure and requires physi- ➤
cian referral and direction specific for dry needling. Phy-
sician referral should be in writing and specific for dry
needling; if the initial referral is received orally, it must be
followed up with a written referral.
If dry needling is performed, a separate procedure note ➤
for each treatment is required, and notes must indicate
how the patient tolerated the technique as well as the
outcome after the procedure.
A patient consent form should be utilized and should ➤
clearly state that the patient is not receiving acupuncture.
The consent form should include the risks and benefits of
the technique, and the patient should receive a copy of
the consent form. The consent form should contain the
following explanation: “Dry needling is a technique used in
physical therapy practice to treat trigger points in muscles.
You should understand that this dry needling technique
should not be confused with a complete acupuncture
treatment performed by a licensed acupuncturist. A com-
plete acupuncture treatment might yield a holistic benefit
not available through a limited dry needling.”
But getting your state to allow PTs to perform dry nee-
dling may require more than a letter requesting permis-
sion; you may need to show evidence that the dry needling
technique works and PTs are appropriate professionals to
perform the task. Jan Dommerholt, PT, DPT, MPS, DAAPM,
president and PT at Bethesda (MD) Physiocare, Inc., is will-
ing to help therapists trying to legalize dry needling in their
states by testifying to the treatment’s efficacy.
Dommerholt runs one of the only dry needling certifica-
tion programs in the country. For more information, visit his
Web site at www.myopainseminars.com.
Source: Adapted from the Virginia Board of Physical Therapy-
Guidance Document.
Do you have recruitment and retention problems?
It’s expensive to hire, rehire, and train
new therapists. In today’s job market,
quality employees are difficult to come
by and even harder to retain.The Essen-
tial Guide to Recruitment and Retention:
Skills for Therapy Managers is a first-of-its-
kind, professional resource that provides
therapy managers with practical, field-tested strategies to
attract and, more importantly, retain high-quality thera-
pists. This book is packed with tools and case studies to
help managers set their practice apart from the rest.
Contact customer service at 800/650-6787
or visit www.hcmarketplace.com.
Page 10 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Therapists have a lot on their minds due to declining
reimbursements, rapidly changing managed care con-
tracts, and the large amount of information supplied by
CMS. Too often, the reason therapists entered the busi-
ness gets lost in the shuffle: the desire to help patients
and practice medicine. So sometimes, instead of reading
about regulatory and reimbursement changes, therapists
should read clinical studies and literature reviews that
affect their profession.
Two such recent studies published in the Journal of the
American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons can help thera-
pists reaffirm their career choice and show that jumping
through all the red tape is a small price to pay for the dif-
ference they can make in patients’ lives.
The first article was published in the February issue of
the journal and dealt with the benefits of PT for patients
with lower back pain; it was lauded by the American
Physical Therapy Association (APTA). The second article
was published in March and stressed the importance of
rehab and therapists in treating patients with medial col-
lateral ligament (MCL) knee injuries.
Articles such as these should be used to promote the
benefits of rehab to patients, physicians, and insurers
who may be trying to reduce therapy benefits, says APTA
spokesperson Julie Fritz, PT, PhD, ATC, clinical out-
comes research scientist at Salt Lake City’s Intermoun-
tain Healthcare and associate professor at the University
of Utah.
Payers want to see the use of evidence to support treat-
ments and justify services, so using evidence-based articles
can help get therapy the respect it deserves in the health-
care industry, says Fritz.
Lower back pain
The February article about lower back pain showed
that PT is most often the best as the frontline treatment
for symptomatic lumbar degenerative disc disease, a com-
mon cause of lower back pain.
The review looked at many treatment methods and
concluded that in most patients with lower back pain,
symptoms are resolved without surgical intervention
when the patient receives PT, especially when used in
combination with nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs
(NSAID). The review also concludes that PT and NSAIDs
are the cornerstones of nonsurgical treatment.
“While the review didn’t tell us a lot that we didn’t
already know as therapists, what it did do was offer a
sign that there’s an increasing recognition from the out-
side world of the benefits of physical therapy,” says Fritz.
“The fact that it was an orthopedic journal and written
by orthopedists outside of the therapy world is what’s
important and telling.”
In the review, PT intervention included strengthening
core muscle groups such as the abdominal wall and lum-
bar musculature, which can have positive effects in pa-
tients with this condition. The review also showed that
exercise and manual therapy, including spinal manipu-
lation, can benefit many patients. In addition, patient
education to remain active and use appropriate body
mechanics is beneficial.
Having documented evidence that PT, rather than sur-
gery, should be considered as a first option can help you
with patients or physicians when going over a plan of
care, says Fritz.
Although other studies exist that show similar results,
having the most current and updated studies is always
helpful in making a case. Posting similar articles around
your office can reassure patients that they are making
the right choice to go through sometimes painful exercis-
es and remind staff members that what they are doing is
beneficial, says Fritz.
MCL therapy
The March clinical study of athletic MCL injuries was
more proof that with most injuries, therapy should be
part of the discussion prior to surgery. The study showed
Recent studies provide evidence for therapy benefitsTherapists should use current literature in marketing and with insurers
April 2009 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations Page 11
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
that for patients with Grade I and II MCL tears, inten-
sive therapy often eliminated the need for surgery. For
patients with Grade III and above tears, receiving ther-
apy services sometimes eliminated the need for surgery
and almost always made the recovery faster, regardless
of whether surgery was performed.
“We found that the heavy majority of MCL injuries
can be treated nonsurgically,” says Ryan G. Miyamoto,
MD, lead author on the study and sports medicine fel-
low at Steadman Hawkins Clinic in Vail, CO.
By emphasizing early range of motion, strengthen-
ing muscles around the knee in the early or later phases
of healing, and using modalities such as ultrasound, PT
can improve the process and help the patient with any
grade of MCL tear.
Although the study mostly examined athletic injuries,
Miyamoto says the concepts should hold true with any
type of MCL injury. In addition, therapists and orthope-
dists working together rather than competing is best for
the patient.
“Communication between the orthopedist and ther-
apist is crucial,” says Miyamoto. “In a hospital setting,
there should be almost daily interaction with the two
specialties working together. And then after the initial
visits or surgery, orthopedists often rely on therapists for
their information.”
Because therapists will typically see a patient more of-
ten than orthopedists, physicians use the therapists’ notes
and tests to make many of their judgments on how to al-
ter patients’ plan of care, says Miyamoto.
“I know some therapists don’t always believe that
orthopedists read over their notes and that sometimes
all the writing is for naught, but a good orthopedist
knows how valuable that information is,” Miyamoto
says. “Therapists have time to perform tests and really
see the difference treatment is making on a day-to-day
basis.”
However, therapists should not try to treat MCL inju-
ries without working with an orthopedist, as there may
be more involved than a therapist can tell without imag-
ing tests, Miyamoto says. “We did see that it’s probably
best that all MCL injuries are overseen by an orthopedist
because of the risk MCL injuries pose to the anterior cru-
ciate ligament if not treated properly,” he says.
If a therapist assumes that only the MCL is dam-
aged, other parts of the knee could be further damaged
if a physician examination hasn’t taken place, says
Miyamoto.
“What we found was that it really has to be a collab-
orative process, where the therapist sets benchmarks
and works as the eyes and ears for the orthopedist and
the orthopedist can make sure all the ligaments and
muscles are repaired and are recovering correctly,” he
explains.
Takeaways
The important aspects of both studies for therapists
are not the clinical recommendations of the studies, but
the practical implications of what they represent.
Neither study presents new ways to treat a back or
knee injury, but they offer advice for working with pa-
tients and physicians to provide the best care possible,
says Fritz.
Therapists too often feel that they are isolated and are
working against insurers and physicians, but by staying
current in the literature, therapists can be on equal foot-
ing and have proof that what they are doing works, is
medically necessary, and should be reimbursable like any
other medical procedure. n
If you’ve developed a unique way to save mon-ey at your outpatient facility, created a new policy that has saved you time, or started a program that improved patient care, we’d love to hear about it. Send us your brilliant ideas and your facility may be featured in BRRR. The person with the best idea will receive a copy of The Pocket Guide to Thera-py Documentation.
Contact Associate Editor Emily Beaver by telephone at 781/639-1872, Ext. 3406, or e-mail [email protected].
Share your bright idea and win a book!
Page 12 Briefings on Outpatient Rehab Reimbursement and Regulations April 2009
© 2009 HCPro, Inc. For permission to reproduce part or all of this newsletter for external distribution or use in educational packets, contact the Copyright Clearance Center at www.copyright.com or 978/750-8400.
Editor’s note: Rick Gawenda, PT, director of rehabilita-
tion services at Detroit Receiving Hospital and owner of Gawenda
Seminars in Ypsilanti, MI, answered the following coding ques-
tions. Submit questions to Associate Editor Emily Beaver at
I have a question regarding billing for VitalStim ther-
apy on Medicare patients. Recently, we have been
receiving denials for provided outpatient therapy ser-
vices. Up until now, I have always billed for a dysphagia
treatment (92526) and an electrical stimulation attended
charge (97032).
I include documentation in all of my SOAP notes re-
garding both types of treatment. Can you give me guid-
ance as to the correct billing on this subject?
CMS does not knowingly reimburse separately for
VitalStim therapy in the treatment of dysphagia pa-
tients. VitalStim therapy is electrical stimulation that SLPs
began using in 2003 as an adjunct to accepted reasonable
and necessary dysphagia treatment interventions. At first,
most CMS contractors were reimbursing separately for
VitalStim therapy when billed under G0283 (unattend-
ed electrical stimulation) or 97032 (electrical stimulation-
manual). Once the CMS contractors determined what
they were reimbursing, they stopped paying separately
for VitalStim therapy since the efficacy has yet to be prov-
en in independent research, in CMS’ opinion.
CMS contractors now consider VitalStim therapy to be
included in the reimbursement for 92526 (treatment of
swallowing dysfunction). Most non-Medicare payers also
follow CMS guidelines and do not knowingly reimburse
separately for VitalStim therapy.
In addition, 97032 is considered a component of the
more comprehensive code 92526 and is not separately
reimbursed. This is a Correct Coding Initiative edit that
can be bypassed by appending modifier -59 to 97032 on
the claim form when billed on the same day as 92526.
It is not something I would recommend doing for the
BRRR coding cornerreasons I previously stated. Modifier -59 is allowed be-
cause if the PT or OT billed 97032 on the same day that
the SLP billed 92526, the provider could be reimbursed
for the manual electrical stimulation provided by the PT
and OT.
When PT assistants (PTA), PTs, and physicians are
working out of the same organization, do PTs bill
under the physician’s name and the PTAs bill under the
PT’s name to Medicare? I had always thought that the
PTAs and the PTs were supposed to bill under the physi-
cian’s name. Can you point me to where Medicare clari-
fies what it deems appropriate billing for this condition?
Under Medicare Part B therapy benefits, services pro-
vided by PTs and OTs in the private practice setting
may be billed “incident to” a physician or nonphysician
practitioner (NPP). An NPP under the Medicare program
is a physician assistant, nurse practitioner, or clinical
nurse specialist.
To be billed as “incident to” the physician or NPP, the
physician or NPP must be on the premises and provide
direct supervision of the therapy services provided by the
therapists. All other outpatient therapy rules and regula-
tions apply as in other outpatient therapy settings.
Services provided by PTAs and OT assistants (OTA)
may not be billed “incident to” a physician or NPP. Ser-
vices provided by a PTA or OTA employed by a physi-
cian office may be billed under the PT’s or OT’s National
Provider Identifier number when directly supervised by
that therapist if the therapist is enrolled in the Medicare
program. If the PT or OT is not enrolled, Medicare shall
not pay for the services of a PTA or OTA billed “incident
to” the physician’s service because the services do not
meet the qualification standards in 42 CFR 484.4.
For more information on “incident to” billing under
the Medicare program, please refer to CMS Pub. 100-02,
Chapter 15, Section 230.5 (www.cms.hhs.gov/manuals/
Downloads/bp102c15.pdf). n