c:\fakepath\new j v tlo
TRANSCRIPT
Patrick Jurney
Blake Huebl
p. 4
Background info
14 year old (T.L.O) caught smoking on school property
Suspicion led assistant principal to search through purse
The assistant principal found drug paraphernalia
Lawyer of T.L.O stated 4th amendment protected her right to privacy - evidence unable to be used in trial
Case eventually appealed to supreme court
Constitutional issues
4th amendment was allegedly violated
Defendant stated that warrant was necessary
Decision of Court
Majority opinion: Search was reasonable and standards of school officials differ from those of police
Concurring opinion: Level of student protection should not be equal to adult’s
Dissenting opinion: School officials need probable cause to search students
Our Opinion
This case has a big impact on all schools
It allows school officials to ensure a safe learning environment is in effect
This case will make sure school officials won’t get in trouble for searching without probable cause
It helps our school be safer and better equipped to handle situations.
Interactive piece
Do you think that school officials need to have probable cause?
Based on this cartoon, how do you think the artist felt about how school officials don’t need probable cause?
Bibliography
http://aclu.procon.org/viewresource.asp?resourceID=458
Classroom resource
Oyez.org
http://www.landmarkcases.org/newjersey/dissenting.html