cfs final report

8/18/2019 CFS final report

1/15

1

The role of ContainerFreight Stations in

Enhancing Port Eciency

James Rarieya


2/15

2

CONTAINER FREIGHT STATIONS AND ICDS

CFS are not a new phenomenon in the maritime industry!

In shipping glossary terms a container freight stationrepresents an area designated by a carrier to load orunload goods from containers.

In the EACA a CFS is referred to as an InternalContainer "epot!

In ombasa for the port community a CFS representsany facility that can act as a secondary customsclearance point for cargo some located within the port#$% sheds& and others located some distance awayfrom the port.


3/15

'


Ideally all these facilities pro(ide relief to portoperations away from the ship)land interfacearea hence the logic that they should be

remo(ed some distance from the *uay andtemporary stac+ing areas . ,he correctterminology should therefore be InlandContainer "epots #IC"s&.


4/15

-


Container Terminal Mixed CargoTerminals

Motor VehicleTerminals

Awanad ogistics !nter"el!n#estments td

African inerTerminal

Com"act FreightSystems td Foc$s CFS %oss FreightTerminal

Consol&ase ' MCT Consol&ase (

)i"e#$ !C* Mitchel Cotts td

Ma+$"a Transit Shed Portside FreightTerminal

M!CT


5/15

CONDITIONS FOR OPERATING A CFS

/E0A E3E04E A4,56I,

Conditions as per 7a8ette notice 1121 of 2-th September 2919

6btain prior appro(al from CS" prior to embar+ing onde(elopment

inimum area of 2. hectares

7enerate no less than +shs199 million in customsre(enue

ail siding


6/15

;

CONDITIONS FOR OPERATING A CFS

/E0A %6,S A4,56I,


7/15

>

(,,( (,,- (,,. (,,/ (,', (,'' (,'(

' $%1?@F% C$< C$< C$< C$< C$< C$<

( $%2?C6, C, C, C, C, C, C,

0 $%'?7< C6%AC, C6%AC, C6%AC, C6%AC,

1 I0,E%E< I0,E%E< I0,E%E< I0,E%E<

2 %6, SI"E %6, SI"E %6, SI"E

3 I,C5E<C6,,S

I,C5E<C6,,S

I,C5E<C6,,S

- A@A0A" A@A0A" A@A0A"

. F6C4S F6C4S

/ /I%E34 /I%E34

', A/4%A A/4%A

'' IC,

EVOLUTION OF KPA LICENCED CFS’s


8/15

B

FUNCTIONS

%ro(ide port with additional capacity for cargostac+ing

%latform for cargo inspection by (arious cargointer(eners

,a= collection point for the Customs Ser(ice"epartment

Storage area for un?cleared goods

,he re(ised /%A stac+ing capacity is 1B999 teuswhilst the combined CFS stac+ing capacity is2>'-9 teus


9/15

PORT CAPACITY

%ort container handling capacity is determined by D

0umber of a(ailable ground slots# ,7S&

Ideal stac+ing height

Container dwell time

Annual ,hroput ,7SG I"EA< S,AC/5EI75,G'; "AS

"@E


10/15

19

PORT CAPACITY

Annual ,hroput 2912 1-2 G '.G'; >'B9> teus B.

,he port as at the end of 6ctober has handled >19;-

teus which implies a thro put of 912>> teus by end of theyear!!

,o date the (olume channeled through the CFS is 1>9->teus. ,his represents D

;1H of the local import cargo

-'H of the total import trac in the port of ombasa


11/15

11

PORT PERFORMANCE INDICATORS

!ndicator (,,- (,,. (,,/ (,', (,'' (,'(Thro$"$t45,,, TE67

2.2 3'2 3'. 3/2 --, ./2

8rossShi""ing9aiting

days

,:10 ,:22 ,:(0 ,:2, ':'' ,:00

Container*well Time 4days7

3:' '(:' 3:, 2:3 3:2 3:-

Shi"

T$rnaro$ndTime

0:- 1:/ 0:3 1:, 1:1 1:(

8rossmo#es;day

(./ (/0 0(, 00, 0,/ 123


12/15

12

CFS IMPACT ON PORT EFFICIENCY

/ey performance indicators ha(e shown a positi(e trendsince 299> and ha(e helped to stabili8e port operations.

2912 is a uni*ue year considering all the de(elopmentacti(ity that was underta+en by the port that had the eJectof reducing the operating capacity.

%ort still not utili8ing the a(ailable CFS capacity. ,heremore scope to use fully the e=isting CFS capacity.


13/15

1'

6$ASA C60,AI0E ,EI0A<


14/15

1-

6$ASA C60,AI0E ,EI0A<

%ioneer CFS operator #formerly S"3 ,ransamiCFS&

Fully owned subsidiary of $ollore Africa


15/15

1

Thank You

cfs final report

Documents