cghs.school.nzcghs.school.nz/wp-content/uploads/2019/07/2018-christchurch-girls-high-school-annual...high...
TRANSCRIPT
Page 1 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
CHRISTCHURCH GIRLS’ HIGH SCHOOL TE KURA O HINE WAIORA – Analysis of Variance 2018
Strategic
Direction
Aims Annual Goals Variance
High Student
Achievement
1.1
Ensure high
levels of
achievement for
all students in
NCEA
All students gain
their relevant year
group
qualification.
Targets:
Level 1 100%
Level 2 100%
Level 3 100%
UE 100%
2018 school-wide NCEA achievement pass rates
Overall Maori Pasifika Asian Boarding
Level 1 96 100 80 92.3 96
Level 2 91.7 91.7 80 95.8 100
Level 3 95.5 100 100 91.3 92.3
UE 82 80 100 82.6 61.5
Level 1. This was a -4% variance. Our tracking had indicated a 95% pass rate throughout the year. Results
were in-line with our predictions. This was 15 students: 1 was an exchange student who left in July, 4 were students who left in or before June, 4 students were international FFP (credit grades of 74, 62, 72, 65), 2
students were on IEPs with our Learning Support department, 1 student had 56% attendance, left at the end of
the year and attended no external examinations, 1 student gained 78 credits and had 80% attendance, 1 student gained 74 credits and 1 student gained 31 credits.
Level 2. This was a -8.3% variance and disappointing. Our tracking throughout the year had indicated a 97% pass rate. This was 25 students: 2 were exchange students, 2 students arrived in July, 11 students left school
on or before September, 1 is on an IEP and has yet to gain numeracy, 1 student was absent from two subjects
for externals and had 58% attendance, 1 student had 79% attendance and achieved N or was absent from externals, 1 student had 62% attendance, 1 student was under medical supervision and absent from all
externals, 1 student was on an IEP and doing a mixed level course, 1 student was on an IEP, had 74% attendance and achieved N or was absent from externals, 1 student was on an IEP had 66% attendance and
was absent from all externals, 1 student was under medical supervision and had 65% attendance, 1 student was a FFP.
Level 3. This was a -4.5 variance. Our tracking had indicated a 95% pass rate. The final result was very close to
the predicted result. This was 9 students: 2 students were FFP and doing Level 2 courses, 2 students were under medical supervision and had under 50% attendance, 1 student was on 54 credits, 1 student achieved 51
credits and had N or SNA for externals, 2 students had 59 credits and 59% and 77% attendance respectively, 1 student left before April.
Page 2 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
UE. This was a -18% variance and it was 2% improvement on 2017 results. We are continuing to analyze the data with regards to this. However, a number of students were ABS or SNA for standards in externals and then
N for the few standards they did sit. Priority Learners. Maori: Level 1 target met. Very pleasing result. Level 2 a negative 8.3% variance which
exactly matched the overall school result. This was three students not achieving. 1 student had left school in
March and 2 students had attendance of 58% and 77% respectively. Level 3 target met. This was very pleasing.
UE a -20% variance. Please see the general comment above.
Pasifika: Level 1 a -20% variance. This was 2 students both of whom were close to passing. Level 2 a -20%
variance. This was one student who has yet to achieve the numeracy requirement. Level 3 and UE target met. A
very pleasing result.
High Student
Achievement
1.2
High levels of
NCEA
endorsements –
subject and
level certificates
Excellence and
Merit combined
endorsements
targets for all
students no
matter ethnicity:
Level 1 90%
Level 2 75%
Level 3 60%
Excellence and Merit endorsement rate school wide:
Level 1 a -7.2% variance
Level 2 a -9% variance
Level 3 a -6.5% variance
As a result of analysis of this data, the 2019 focus will be on Level 3 endorsements. Level 1 and 2 combined
endorsements remain above the national and decile level. However, at level 3 our endorsement rates are below
the decile level results and the gap has closed between school and national results.
We are also concerned about the endorsement success of our Maori and Pasifika students at Level 2 and 3. This
will be incorporated into our Maori and Pasifika action plan.
Overall Maori Pasifika
Asian
Level 1 82.8 82.6 42.8 78.125
Level 2 66 47.6 0 68.96
Level 3 53.5 33.3 0 69.56
High Student
Achievement
1.3
National
Scholarships
The number of
scholarships is
equivalent to 5%
of the Year 13 roll
12 Scholarships were gained by 9 students in 8 learning areas. Staff prepare students in non-timetabled time
and this is a testament to their dedication. The target was exceeded by 1.5%. Nevertheless, this result is
disappointing. Our most able students do not opt for scholarship. They prefer to get Excellence endorsement
which guarantees targeted entry scholarships at many universities.
Page 3 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
High Student
Achievement
1.4
High levels of
achievement for
junior students.
100% of students
are at or above
the relevant
curriculum level
for year 9.
100% of students
are at or above
the relevant
curriculum level
for year 10.
Junior students continue to be scaffolded well through years 9 and 10. STEADA (Student Engagement,
Achievement and Data Analysis) tracks junior achievement in each faculty. Year 9 students come from over 71
contributing schools and staff work hard to consolidate skills and knowledge in all areas as well as progress
learning. STEADA data shows students moving well from Year 9 to Year 10 with the same cohort groups
showing improvement in achievement in similar curriculum strands between Years 9 and 10. An external
empirical indicator which supports our own tracking are the MidYis results which allow for value added from
Years 9 to Year 11. The average standardized residual value added to students at CGHS is 0.6 and this is
statistically significant (beyond chance) when compared to students of like ability in the national cohort. Most
learning areas had positive value added with Design and Visual Communication, Economics, English, Physical
Education, Science and Technology showing statistically significant progress compared to the national cohort.
English Y9 2018 2017 English Y10 2018 2017
Response to text -2% -15% Response to text -3.2% -4%
Close Reading -4% -17% Close Reading -3.2% -9%
Oral Target Met -1% Oral -0.8% -3%
Creative writing -10.4% -21% Formal writing -10.8% -5%
Personal Reading -8% na Personal reading -8.4% -7%
Mathematics Y9 2018 2017 Mathematics
Y10
2018 2017
Algebra Skills -20% -15%* Algebra Skills -34% -28%*
Geometric Reasoning -9% na Trigonometry -25.6% -19%
Measurement -22.8% -9% Statistics -10.7% -10%
Number -5% -3% Number -24.2% -12%
Linear Algebra -8.2% -6%* Tables/equation
s etc
-9.6% na
Page 4 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Science Y9 2018 2017 Science Y10 2018 2017
Chemistry -1.7% -18% Chemistry -3.2% -11%
Physics -1.3% -9% Physics -3.6% -9%
Engage with Science -1.25% -9% Engage with
Science
-3.3% na
Biology -0.8% -10% Biology -1.6% -5%
Geology -2.5% -16%
Social Studies Y9 2018 2017 Social Studies
Y10
2018 2017
Research -13.2% -7% Research -7.2% -7%
Communication -2.4% -1% Communication -6.8% -5%
Values -2.4% -0.4% Values -2.4% -4.7%
Knowledge -4.4% -5% Knowledge -4.8% -5%
Skills -2.6% -3% Skills -3.5% -3%
PE & Health Y9 2018 2017 PE & Health Y10 2018 2017
Physical Activity Target
met
-0.4% Physical Activity -0.4% Target met
Movement Skills -2% -0.4% Movement Skills -0.8% na
Sport Specific Move. Target
met
na Sport Specific
Move.
-0.8% na
Creative Movement Target
met
-0.4% Creative
Movement
-0.4% -2%
Page 5 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Personal Well-being -3.3% Target
met
Values Target
met
-0.3%
Personal Safety -3.7% -3% Nutrition -2% Target met
Personal safety -0.8% 0.2%
The Arts
Music Y9 2018 2017 Music Y10 2018 2017
Performance Target met Target
met
Performance Target met Target met
Composition Target met Target
met
Composition Target met Target met
Aural -1.2% Target
met
Aural -4.6% Target met
Written Target met na Written -1.5% na
Drama Y9 2018 2017 Drama Y10 2018 2017
Developing Ideas -1.4% Met Developing
Ideas
Met Met
Comm. & Interpret. -1.4% na Comm. &
Interpret.
-1% na
Practical Know. Met na Practical
Know.
-5% na
Understand. in
Context
-0.7% na Understand. in
Context
Met na
Art Y9 2018 2017 Drama Y10 2018 2017
Developing Ideas Met Met Developing
Ideas
Met Met
Comm. & Interpret. -1.3% -3% Comm. & -4.3% Met
Page 6 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Interpret.
Practical Know. Met Met Practical
Know.
Met Met
Understand. in
Context
-2% -1% Understand.
in Context
-5.1% Met
Languages
Chinese Y9 2018 2017 Chinese Y10 2018 2017
Listening -6% Met Listening -4.8% -7%
Reading -6% Met Reading Met -7%
Speaking -2% Met Speaking -4.8% Met
Writing -6% Met Writing -4.8% -3.5%
French Y9 2018 2017 French Y10 2018 2017
Listening -1.7% Met Listening -5.2% -1%
Reading -5.1% -8% Reading -7.7% -1%
Speaking Met -1.3% Speaking -2.6% -1%
Writing -5.9% -5% Writing -5.2% -1%
German Y9 2018 2017 German Y10 2018 2017
Listening Met -2% Listening Met Met
Reading -2.2% -2% Reading Met Met
Speaking -4.4% -4% Speaking Met Met
Writing -11% -7% Writing Met Met
Te Reo Y9 2018 2017 Te Reo Y10 2018 2017
Page 7 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Whakarongo -32% -4% Whakarongo -6.25% -4%
Panui -2.3% -7% Panui Met -4%
Tuhituhi -13.4% -14% Tuhituhi -10.6% -4%
Korero -9.8% Met Korero -11.8% -9%
Commerce
Economics Y9 2018 2017 Economics
Y10
2018 2017
Choice -2% -9% Demand -1% -3%
Income -7% -12% Consumer -2.6% na
Money -2% -0.8% Econ. Part. -8.5% -7%
Spending -2% Met Accounting -5.2% -9%
Cash -4% -2% Enterprise -1% -2%
Savings -1% -2% Sharemarket -4.2% -3%
Insurance -1% -2%
Technology
Technology Y9 2018
Brief -22.8%
Planning -5.2%
Outcome -3.6%
Media -8%
Managing Info -5.2%
Com. Thinking -6%
Fabric Tech -4.8%
Page 8 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Construction -7.2%
Des & Tech -7.6%
Food &Fabric
Y10
2018 2017 Graphics Y10 2018 2017 Digitaltech.
Y10
2018 2017
Textiles -4.4% -1% Freehand Met -2% Website Met Met
Nutrition -2.9% -10%* Visual Met -2% Imaging Met -5%
NZ issue -
24.3%
-18% Develop… Met Met Algorithms Met na
Garment -5.8% -2% Manufacture -5.6% -2% Programming -5% -5%
Research Met -5% Managing
Info
-10% -2.5%
Use Work Met -7%
Model -4.2% -2%
Instrument. na Met
Page 9 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
1.5
High levels of
attendance
All year groups
have over 90%
attendance.
Proactively
manage Year 13
attendance
Attendance rates were actively tracked and reported to the board. No year group achieved over 90%
attendance. Unjustified absences were very small and truancy is not an issue at the school. Intermittent
absences are of concern and at an average of 5.5% for the year. Justified absences account for most absences
at an average of 8.275%. For learners who are at risk, continuity of learning and hence attendance is important.
Year 13 were monitored closely. Students whose attendance dipped below 80% or who deliberately missed
selected classes were followed up and had privileges removed. Year 13 attendance in 2018 was much better
than 2017. Level 3 pass rates increased from 89.4% in 2017 to 95.5% in 2018. Endorsement rates remained
similar with 54.4% receiving endorsed certificates in 2017 and 53.5% in 2018.
Quality
Learning
Environment
2.1
Participation in a
variety of co-
curricular
activities.
Students are
encouraged with
local, regional
and national
aspirations
90% of students
are involved in
co-curricular
activities.
A wide range of
opportunities is
provided.
Facilities are
completed and
fully utilised
The school continues to believe in a holistic approach to education. A wide range of opportunities continue to be
provided. 58 sporting or cultural/artistic pursuits are offered.
72.3% of students were involved in school organised co-curricular activities. This was a drop from 2017.
However, in 2017 results included academic co-curricular groups but these were excluded this year.
Notable highlights this year included placing third in national Federation Cup for hockey, making the top four
nationally once again at the Condor 7s, achieving outstanding national athletics results and placing second in the
national cricket competition.
On the cultural and arts front our Pasikifa students performed with pride at Polyfest and our Maori students with
distinction at Manu Korero. Cantrices won Outstanding work by a choir with a first-time conductor and
Outstanding Performance of a Contemporary/ Commercial Composition at the Big Sing. Song and Dance came
back to school with the gala performance to celebrate our new PAC.
Duke of Edinburgh: 46 students were involved in Duke of Edinburgh this year, fewer than the record number
last year. 38 students gained Bronze 7 gained Silver and 1 gained Gold.
9 students were NZ representatives in archery, cheerleading, highland dance, judo, kayaking, rhythmic
gymnastics, sailing, softball and volleyball. These were different students than those in 2017 and rhythmic
gymnastics is the only repeat sport.
2.2
Progress the
rebuild
Progress the
refurbishment of
In 2018 the refurbishment and strengthening of Level 4 and roof of the main block occurred. This has
significantly improved the physical environment of the English faculty who occupy this area. However, it has not
been without major impact on the well-being of staff both physical and emotional. During the refurbishment,
floors 1-3 were still occupied. Assurances were given that work would occur after school hours with only minor,
Page 10 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
the technology
and main blocks
Continue to
develop the
school site
Balance rebuild
methodology with
curriculum needs
and staff and
student welfare
non-invasive work happening while school was in session. Our experiences on the PAC had clearly shown that
major construction work could not occur during school time. It was agreed at SDG meetings that because work
on the main block was much more intrusive and invasive, it would be conducted after school hours (for example
between 4pm and 11pm.) This understanding was not adhered to. Dust and noise continued to be part of the
school day. Matters came to a head when welding fumes drifted into occupied spaces during school time. It
resulted in the commissioning of an independent report by a Health and Safety Consultant on behalf of the
Board, CGHS staff and PPTA. Only then was the original agreed work methodology actually put into practice.
School concerns would have appeared to have been ignored and it was only when the Ministry perceived it did
have a major problem that the matter was taken seriously. This was not before the integrity of the board and
senior staff was partially compromised with staff, students and our parent community.
No work has occurred on the technology block and three floors of the main block await remediation. We are at a
stand-still because there is no pathway forward that will allow safe occupancy of the main block while building
continues as there are no viable spaces for the school to decant into. Original time frames for “invasive” work on
the ground floor (ie building not occupied) have been extended from ‘November to the end of January’ to ‘from
November to the start of third term’. When methodologies were agreed extended timelines were not part of the
equation. Changing information has made future planning extremely difficult.
Defects in the PAC, completed end of 2017, have not been fully remedied by the end of 2018.
2.3
e-Learning
Continue to build
staff and student
capacity with e-
learning
pedagogies and
practices
Building Staff capacity with e-learning pedagogies and practices
PD provided as part of induction process for new staff
PD sessions organised with departments for Turnitin
PD session for Clickview
PD session on digital tools for learning engagement, also offered in Dept Pedagogical meetings
PD on virtual learning (Google Cardboard)
Individual PD provided for Google Classroom, OneNote, OnStream, Google Sites, Team Drives
Individual support provided to teachers in class, via email or face to face sessions
Team Drive created for e-learning resources for staff – help guides etc
Information shared with staff via email on latest tools/websites – relevant to departments
Page 11 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
Building student capacity with e-learning pedagogies and practices
IT Bootcamp run for all Year 9 Ako Classes
Web printing (from own device) was identified as a problem area. A video tutorial was produced and a link created on OnStream to facilitate web printing.
E-learning slideshows updated on OnStream for students to access information about Google, Office 365 and the school network.
Ako class visits by IT committee for troubleshooting
E-Learning website created with pages on troubleshooting, OnStream, remote access to files, school network etc (ongoing project)
A lunchtime help desk was established in the library – run by IT committee
A survey was conducted on the school app, with a view to incorporating feed back and increasing student usage of this tool.
Improved system of device loans to students – now run through the library system
The requirement for students to have a device for use in every lesson, and the availability of loan devices was
reinforced.
2.4
Each student
has the skills and
qualifications to
determine her own future
pathway.
Implement ako
time
Enhance profile of Career education
and future
pathway planning
Develop an action plan for the
retention and achievement of
Maori and Pasifika students that
meets
expectations of
In 2018, Christchurch Girls’ High School introduced ako time. This was scheduled on a Wednesday before
interval, in a 30 minute slot. The aims of ako time were:
- To strengthen students connections to each other, our staff, the school and the wider school community.
- To develop students’ wellbeing, thinking capacities and character strengths. - To give our students the tools and support to take control of their own learning and future directions.
- To support our students to “find their balance” in their lives by embracing a growth mindset. - To allow our students to view challenges and failures as opportunities to improve their learning and
skills.
- For students to assess themselves, journal their thoughts and set self-expectations to develop elements of their wellbeing.
Students spent up to 15 sessions in 2018 in their ako class with their ako teacher. Each year level had a
dedicated programme and the topics that were covered were age and stage appropriate. For example, Year 13
students wanted to hear about budgeting and managing flat expenses, whereas Year 10 students needed to spend time on responsible device use around social media.
Page 12 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
the school and
whanau
To support the programme, every student purchased an ako workbook. This resource was purchased from Learning Curve and had CGHS specific pages incorporated in it.
In 2018, after a year of the programme, feedback was gathered from students and staff. Many commented on similar things:
- the ako workbook is too big and heavy - need more time playing games and getting to know each other and building relationships
- continue with character strengths, growth mindset, turangawaewae - spend more time on career and academic mentoring, life skills, goal setting
- fewer assemblies so continuity is maintained between ako sessions
The 2019 programme has taken these comments/recommendations into consideration and a significant number
of changes have been made.
Careers at CGHS in 2018 was integrated in Ako time. Career Central (a whole school programme) was bought on
board week 10 Term Two at the end of July. Students utilise this system completing modules that allow students to gain a deeper understanding of who they are, their qualities and skills, and to take these to create
personalised career planning. Most students had utilized this programme well and had completed the first three modules by the end of the year. With ongoing use by staff in Ako time as well as follow-up by Careers staff this
a very useful tool at our disposal.
Yr 13 also undertook the 'Myself Career Assessment' run by external provider Sheffield Consulting. This
questionnaire and subsequent personalised report provided detailed insight into strength and challenge areas for
each student and how these align with different careers. Students valued this report and found the follow-up feedback session very useful. Many used some of the key findings about their strengths when applying for both
scholarships and Halls of Residence applications.
STAR and Gateway funding were used for a number of different courses as well as the Gateway class. There
were over 100 students who attended a range of STAR courses. These included a Vision College barista course
and barista qualifications through Pinnacle Hospitality; Customer Service Courses and Christchurch Teamwork courses through The Learning Place, and L2 Hospitality/Catering credits through Ara. Most courses were held
during each of the holidays. Other providers used were Kalandra, NTA, Sound Engineering through MAINZ, Telford, ITC Flight Attending Short Course, City First Aid, Youth Alive Trust Babysitting, Yoobee, The Learning
Place Bartending, Kristen Stewart Makeup course.
The Gateway class was introduced in 2018 replacing the previous Extension Studies class. Student numbers began with 15 but by Term 3 only 12 students remained with the students who left going to another school
(Hagley Community College) or Tertiary Provider (Ara). Students were offered a range of standards that fitted
Page 13 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
with their career paths. Term One saw students work through Core Generic standards that helped them establish their future pathway ideas. They also completed a First Aid course and visited tertiary providers such
as Ara and Avonmore. Students worked towards making decisions where their Work Experience placement
would be, learning about what would best suit their interests and skills. Courses that were completed by students ranged from Telford which provided agriculture standards, WelTech, ITC (International Tourism
College) and Porse. Term Two saw students in a work placement in the community for one day a week with standards associated with this learning to be completed when back in class. In Term Three outside providers
were used after earlier discussion with students as to what they would value or find useful to help with future decisions. Pinnacle Hospitality and Plunket assessed students around Teamwork, Interview techniques, basic
play and basic needs of young children. Term Four saw the completion of a group activity through Pinnacle
where students organized the collection and dispersal of donated goods to the Women’s Refuge.
In 2018 with consultation with our whanau community a Maori and Pasifika action plan was implemented.
Whanau were consulted about what they expected from our school and what their hopes and aspirations were for their daughters. We introduced a whanau form class. 27 students signed up to be part of the group with
incorporates Maori tikinga and kawa. In 2019, 49 students have chosen to be part of this group. It is made up of
11 ethnic groups and is open for any students who feels that the vertical structure of the class will meet their holistic needs and sense of belonging within the school.
2.5 Develop the
wellbeing of
staff and students
Progress the staff and student well-
being programme
The pastoral curriculum
enhances well-being, promotes
deep learning and
positive engagement
In 2018 we introduced a school wide Ako programme which finds in foundations in social and emotional learning principles aimed at promoting positive youth development.
Alongside the introduction of the student focused wellbeing programme we continued to work on our staff wellbeing. In term three we conducted our second staff wellbeing survey.
The survey found that staff continue to be committed to the successful achievement of our students. There is a
strong sense of sharing, connectedness, feeling safe and belonging within the departments however continued
work needs to be done to improve the cross-departmental relationships, including reducing the sense of competition between departments while also working on the sense of safety and trust amongst staff. There
continues to be concerns around building or lack of progress in the building programme, some interpersonal relationships between some staff and some staff felt there was a lack of availability and visibility of SLT.
In 2018 we were part of the Grow Waitaha Wellbeing Community of Practice and will continue to do so.
However, in 2019 the team will consist of 3 staff and at least 2 team members being students. This COP is for
staff and students who are passionate about exploring and collaborating together around growing wellbeing across our school community where keynote speakers share initiatives as well as schools sharing successful
wellbeing initiatives with each other. We will also continue to have facilitated mentor session with our wellbeing team.
Page 14 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
For 2019 we will continue to work with both staff and students to enhance wellbeing and positive engagement
while continuing to gain feedback from both staff and students through regular questionnaires and an open door
policy.
Effective
school
organisation
and structure
3.1
Quality Boarding
Provide a quality
boarding
experience.
Acland House remains full. The 2018 survey indicates that 95.71% of parents are satisfied that Acland facilities
cater for their daughters’ needs. They are also very satisfied that a positive culture is promoted at the hostel.
Security, heating and privacy continue to rank as priorities with parents. 97.14% of students are happy at
Acland and parents are very satisfied with the level of pastoral care and communication.
Food is always a contentious issue at boarding school. In 2018 this was a targeted area. Survey results indicate
that 95.71% (80.36% in 2017) are satisfied with food. This is a very pleasing result. 90% (76.79% in 2017) feel
the diet is healthy. 85.71% of students (67.86% in 2017) feel they get enough food.
A further focus area identified was offering a greater number and variety of activities at Acland. This improved
from 80.36% in 2017 to 87.14%.
3.2
Effective
systems are
used to identify,
monitor and
support all
students,
including those
at risk of not
achieving.
Integrate hautu
into BOT self-
review process to enable the BOT to
review CGHS responsiveness to
Maori, promote
conversation and foster an
awareness of understanding
Continue to integrate
principles of tātaiako with staff
Annual auditing of well-being
programme
including
The Board started looking at hautu in 2017 with a discussion of Ka Hikitia and tātaiako. More work needs to be
done in this area and this will continue in 2019.
Please refer to 2.5 above for reference to the well-being programme. This work has started and will develop
through 2019. The school wide definition of well-being, development of a whakatauki and a CGHS specific well-
being model commenced in 2018 and will be continued into 2019.
Page 15 of 15 2018 analysis of variance
developing and embedding a
school-wide
definition of well-being and
whakatauki; Designing a CGHS
specific and culturally
responsive model
of well-being Developing and
designing a well-being programme
3.3
The school
resources meet
identified needs.
A positive budget
is maintained
The 2018 budget anticipated a $87 149 deficit. The final result is likely to be $200 341 surplus. The $287 490
swing was due to two main factors:
1. Higher than budgeted income from MOE operations grant, less expenditure on foreign fee paying students
and interest on investments and
2. Less operating expenditure with learning resources costs being lower than budgeted.