cgsr project final
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
1/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
2/53
INDEX
AIM OF STUDY
INTRODUCION
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
COMPANY WISE ANALYSIS
o TITAN INDUSTRIESo SHOPPERS STOPo PANTALOONSo BOMBAY DYEING
APPENDIX
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
3/53
AIM OF STUDY
Our basic aim is to find the relation between performance of firm and the governance
mechanism. We used Tobins Q for measuring firm performance. We have chosen retail industry
for the same purpose. First we calculated Tobins Q of various companies of the same industry
of last 3 years. After that we found t he relation between Tobins Q and number of boardmembers & regression line between Tobins Q and board Composition.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
4/53
INTRODUCTION
Retail consists of the sale of goods or merchandise from a fixed location, such as a department
store, boutique or kiosk, or by mail, in small or individual lots for direct consumption by thepurchaser.
Retailing may include subordinated services, such as delivery. Purchasers may be
individuals or businesses. In commerce, a "retailer" buys goods or products in large quantitiesfrom manufacturers or importers, either directly or through a wholesaler, and then sells smaller
quantities to the end-user. Retail establishments are often called shops or stores. Retailers are atthe end of the supply chain. Manufacturing marketers see the process of retailing as a necessary
part of their overall distribution strategy. The term "retailer" is also applied where a serviceprovider services the needs of a large number of individuals, such as a public utility, like electric
power.
Shops may be on residential streets, shopping streets with few or no houses or in a shoppingmall. Shopping streets may be for pedestrians only. Sometimes a shopping street has a partial or
full roof to protect customers from precipitation. Online retailing, a type of electroniccommerce used for business-to-consumer (B2C) transactions and mail order, are forms of non-
shop retailing.
Shopping generally refers to the act of buying products. Sometimes this is done to obtainnecessities such as food and clothing; sometimes it is done as a recreational activity.
Recreational shopping often involves window shopping (just looking, not buying) and browsingand does not always result in a purchase.
A marketplace is a location where goods and services are exchanged. The traditional marketsquare is a city square where traders set up stalls and buyers browse the merchandise. This kind
of market is very old, and countless such markets are still in operation around the whole world.
In some parts of the world, the retail business is still dominated by small family-run stores, but
this market is increasingly being taken over by large retail chains.
Retail is usually classified by type of products as follows:
Food products Hard goods ("hardline retailers") - appliances, electronics, furniture, sporting goods, etc. Soft goods - clothing, apparel, and other fabrics.
There are the following types of retailers by marketing strategy:
Department stores - very large stores offering a huge assortment of "soft" and "hardgoods; often bear a resemblance to a collection of specialty stores. A retailer of such storecarries variety of categories and has broad assortment at average price. They offer
considerable customer service.
Discount stores - tend to offer a wide array of products and services, but they competemainly on price offers extensive assortment of merchandise at affordable and cut-rate
prices. Normally retailers sell less fashion-oriented brands. However the service isinadequate.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
5/53
General merchandise store - a hybrid between a department store and discount store; Supermarkets - sell mostly food products; Warehouse stores - warehouses that offer low-cost, often high-quantity goods piled on
pallets or steel shelves; warehouse clubs charge a membership fee;
Variety stores or "dollar stores" - these offer extremely low-cost goods, with limitedselection.
RETAIL LAWS IN INDIA
The retail sector is one of the most important parts of the Indian economy, making up 10 percentof its economy, as well as 8 percent of its workforce. Despite its size, many of the businesses that
operate within the country are family-owned and operate within their houses. Retail laws in Indiaare mainly placed in the subsections of consumer rights and trading standards, but they can be
tricky to enforce.
BACKGROUND
The growth in India's retail sector has grown as fast as it has in the last decade for three reasons:
Indian citizens have, overall, become richer due to the growing economy and therefore havemore disposable income. Following this growing income has been a growing desire for non-
essential goods. Since India doesn't have as organized a retail sector, it is easier to find and buygoods from independent retailers. The most popular sectors of the retail industry in India are the
food and mobile phone sectors, and as a result, competition is quite fierce and takes the form ofpricing wars, ultimately benefiting the customer.
SALE OF GOODS
This section of retail law is established under the Sale of Goods Act 1930--this decree coverssubjects such as the sale of goods, selling at the valuation price, description of goods and therights of a seller who hasn't received the entirety of an agreed payment.
AGREEMENT TO SELL
This part is concerned with the concept of contracts for the sale of goods (not, in this case,physical contracts but rather verbal agreements between the buyer and the seller). With these, the
seller must transfer or agree to transfer ownership of a good to a buyer for the pre-agreed price,with the agreement either being absolute or conditional, i.e., subject to conditions set by the
seller.
VALUATION PRICES
This goes into detail about the rules of agreeing prices, saying such valuations are set by a third-
party, i.e., the government and the central bank, and the agreement between the buyer and theseller must take this into consideration. If either party prevents the agreement of a formal
valuation, the affected party has the right to take legal action against the offending party.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
6/53
DESCRIPTION OF GOODS
This part is designed for any goods that are marketed via description, such as a good sold over
the Internet or phone. Any good sold in this manner must meet the description originally given,and if a sample is given along with the description, both must ultimately represent the final
product correctly.
RIGHTS OF SELLER
This part of retail law has its own subsections. One example is the seller's right to prevent thedelivery of a good in certain cases, such as when the buyer has filed for bankruptcy. The seller is
within their right to withhold the good indefinitely or until the full payment has been made.
THEORETICAL CONCEPTS USED
Tobins q:
Tobin's q is a Market based measure and was developed by James Tobin of Yale University,Nobel laureate in economics in 1969. Compares the value of the stocks of a company listed in
the financial market with the value of a company's equity book value.
A proxy of the above formula is
Application:
If the market value reflected solely the recorded assets of a company, Tobin's q would be1.0.
If Tobin's q is greater than 1.0, then the market value is greater than the value of thecompany's recorded assets.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
7/53
This suggests that the market value reflects some unmeasured or unrecorded assets of thecompany.
High Tobin's q value encourages companies to invest more in capital because they are"worth" more than the price they paid for them.
If Tobin's q is less than 1, the market value is less than the recorded value of the assets ofthe company. This suggests that the market may be undervaluing the company.
Lang and Stulz, found out that diversified companies have a lower Q-ratio than focusedfirms because the market penalizes the value of the firm assets.
Composition of BOD:
Composition of BOD= Number of independent directors/ Total number of BOD
Size of BOD is the number of people in board of director.
Correlation:
The correlation is one of the most common and most useful statistics. A correlation is a singlenumber that describes the degree of relationship between two variables. In excel it can be find
out as using correl function.
Regression:
Regression analysis includes any techniques for modelling and analyzing several variables, when
the focus is on the relationship between a dependent variable and one or more independentvariables. More specifically, regression analysis helps us understand how the typical value of the
dependent variable changes when any one of the independent variables is varied, while the otherindependent variables are held fixed. IN excel it can be found out using data analysis tool pack.
The straight line equation using regression comes out to be,
y = b1 + b2 x
Where,
Y= Tobins q
X= Composition of BOD
The value of b1 and b2 tells the relationship between x and y. Also information like R Square and
Standard deviation tells about the fit of the model as a whole.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
8/53
INDUSTRY ANALYSIS
Five companies have been taken as listed in the Bombay Stock Exchange:
1) Titan Industry
2) Shoppers Stop
3) Pantaloons
4) Bombay Dyeing
The consolidated data of the industry is as follows:
Tobins Q:
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Titan Industry 0.80 0.50 1.31
Shoppers Stop 0.26 0.31 0.26
Pantaloons 0.59 0.61 0.45
Bombay Dyeing 0.96 0.81 1.06
Average Tobins Q 0.645 0.555 0.77
Number of Board members:
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Titan Industry 12 12 12
Shoppers Stop 9 10 10
Pantaloons 9 10 11
Bombay Dyeing 13 14 12
Average 10.75 11.5 11.25
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
9/53
Board Composition:
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Titan Industry 0.33 0.5 0.5
Shoppers Stop 0.44 0.5 0.5
Pantaloons 0.67 0.6 0.5
Bombay Dyeing 0.25 0.42 0.46
Average 0.4225 0.505 0.49
Correlation between Board Size and Tobins Q
Column 1 Column 2
Column 1 1
Column 2 -0.237470674 1
The correlation value between Tobins Q and Board Size comes out to be -0.237. This shows
there is a inversely prepositional correlation between Board size and Tobins Q for the company.
So, as the board size will increase, the companys performance will decrease.
The reason for this can be that the average board size was increasing in 2009 increasing in
comparison to 2008, average Tobins Q decreases for the same years and again avg board size
decreases in 2010, Tobins Q increases for the same and its more closer to 1, that means
industry performance increased.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
10/53
Regression between Tobins Q and Board Composition
Coefficients
Intercept 0.746885113
X Variable 1 -0.190938511
Y = A + BX
So, the equation thus formed is:
Y = -0.190938511X + 0.746885113
This negative value of slope shows that in a board size that if we try to increase the number ofindependent directors, it inversely effect the growth of industry so we are not suppose the
increase number of independent directors. And the less value of intercept clearly shows thatindependent directors are required for industry till an extant.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
11/53
Jaypee Business School
A constituent of Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University
A-10, Sector 62, Noida (UP) India 201 307www.jbs.ac.in
Corporate Governance &
Social Responsibility
Company Name: Titan Industry
Submitted by:
Kshitiz Agrawal 06503853
Amreesh Tyagi 06503857
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
12/53
COMPANY PROFILE
Titan Industries is the organization that brought about a paradigm shift in the Indian watch
market when it introduced its futuristic quartz technology, complemented by internationalstyling. With India's two most recognized and loved brands Titan and Tanishq to its credit, Titan
Industries is the fifth largest integrated watch manufacturer in the world.
The success story began in 1984 with a joint venture between the Tata Group and the TamilNadu Industrial Development Corporation. Presenting Titan quartz watches that sported an
international look, Titan Industries transformed the Indian watch market. After Sonata, a valuebrand of functionally styled watches at affordable prices, Titan Industries reached out to the
youth segment with Fastrack, its third brand, trendy and chic. The company has sold 100 millionwatches world over and manufactures 12 million watches every year.
With a license for premium fashion watches of global brands, Titan Industries repeated itspioneering act and brought international brands into Indian market. Tommy Hilfiger, Hugo Boss
and FCUK as well as the Swiss made watch Xylys owe their presence in Indian market to TitanIndustries.
Entering the largely fragmented Indian jewellery market with no known brands in 1995, TitanIndustries launched Tanishq, Indias most trusted and fastest growing jewellery brand. Gold
Plus, the later addition, focuses on the preferences of semi-urban and rural India. Completing thejewellery portfolio is Zoya, the latest retail chain in the luxury segment.
Titan Industries has also made its foray into eyewear, launching Fastrack eyewear and
sunglasses, as well as prescription eyewear. The organization has leveraged its manufacturingcompetencies and branched into precision engineering products and machine building.
With over 624 retail stores across a carpet area of over 7,70,848 sq. ft. Titan Industries hasIndias largest retail network. The company has over 300 exclusive World of Titan' showrooms
and over 650 after-sales-service centers. Titan Industries is also the largest jewellery retailer inIndia with over 119 Tanishq boutiques and Zoya stores, over 28 Gold Plus stores and over 120
Titan Eye+ stores. The company has two exclusive design studios for watches and jewellery
Backed by 4,934 employees, two exclusive design studios for watches and jewellery, 11
manufacturing units, and innumerable admirers world over, Titan Industries continues to growand sets new standards for innovation and quality. The organization is all geared to repeat theTitan and Tanishq success story with each new offering.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
13/53
CALCULATION FOR TOBINS Q
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
14/53
Market Cap = Total share x market price
Total share Market Price (lakhs) Market Cap
2008-2009 8413451 0.012125 102013.0934
2009-2010 6602453 0.010885 71867.70091
2010-2011 9562008 0.02824 270031.1059
Book value of Debt.
Secured
Loans Unsecured Loans
Book Value
Debt.
2008-2009 18854.91 6978.02 25832.93
2009-2010 11657.93 5865 17522.93
2010-2011 7279.04 0 7279.04
Book value of assets
Net Block Investments Current Assets
BookValue of
assets
2008-2009 28771.59 234.44 130351.79 159357.8
2009-2010 29948.18 159.51 148226.57 178334.3
2010-2011 28011.14 159.51 182347.22 210517.9
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
15/53
Tobbin's Q=(Market Cap. +Book Debt.)/Book Assets
Market Cap. Book Debt.
Book Value
Assets Tobbins'Q
2008-2009 102013.0934 25832.93 159357.82 0.802258
2009-2010 71867.70091 17522.93 178334.26 0.5012532010-2011 270031.1059 7279.04 210517.87 1.317276
CALCULATION FOR BOARD COMPOSITION
The composition and category of directors as of March 31, 2008 is as
follows:
The composition and category of directors as of March 31, 2009 is as follows:
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
16/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
17/53
SUMMARY OUTPUT
Regression Statistics
Multiple R 0.14971214
R Square 0.022413725
Adjusted R Square -0.95517255
Standard Error 0.577015234
Observations 3
ANOVA
df SS MS F Significance F
Regression 1 0.007633672 0.007633672 0.022927618 0.904330611
Residual 1 0.33294658 0.33294658
Total 2 0.340580252
Coefficients Standard Error t Stat P-value Lower 95% Upper 95% Lower 95.0% Upper 95.0%
Intercept 0.588243513 1.913743029 0.307378527 0.810152177 -23.72816722 24.90465425 -23.72816722 24.904654
X Variable 1 0.642042282 4.24017869 0.151418685 0.904330611 -53.23453626 54.51862083 -53.23453626 54.518620
The equation thus formed is
Y= 0.642042281899256X + 0.588243513316362
Here intercept is around 0.6 which shows that we decrease no. of independent directors to zero
than Tobins Q value will be 0.6which reflects that firms performance will reduce.
Similarly slope is equal to 0.64 i.e. if we reduce no. of independent directors or decrease in
boards composition than it will reduce Tobins Q in same amount. It shows that change in
boards composition will directly affect firms performance.
CORRELATION
Since there is no change in Board size so we are considering 3 cases
1. No change in Board sizeTobbin's Q Total board size
2008-2009 0.802257607 12
2009-2010 0.50125327 12
2010-2011 1.317276039 12
If no change in Total no. of directors than no correlation because there is no variation in
Board size.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
18/53
2. Decrement in Board sizeTobbin's Q Total board size
2008-2009 0.802257607 12
2009-2010 0.50125327 11
2010-2011 1.317276039 12
If there is a decrement in board size than Negatively correlated -0.757518604053157
3. Increment in Board sizeTobbin's Q Total board size
2008-2009 0.802257607 12
2009-2010 0.50125327 13
2010-2011 1.317276039 12
If there is an increment in board size than Positively correlated 0.757518604053157
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
19/53
Jaypee Business School
A constituent of Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University
A-10, Sector 62, Noida (UP) India 201 307
www.jbs.ac.in
Corporate Governance &Social Responsibility
Company Name: Shoppers Stop
Submitted by:
C. M. V. Teja 06503857
Akhil P. S. Pundhir 06503870
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
20/53
COMPANY PROFILE
Shoppers Stop is an Indian department stores promoted by the K Raheja Corp Group (Chandru L
Raheja Group), started in the year 1991 with its first store in Andheri, Mumbai Shoppers Stop
Ltd has been awarded "the Hall of Fame" and won "the Emerging Market Retailer of the Year
Award", by World Retail Congress at Barcelona, on April 10, 2008. Shoppers Stop is listed onthe BSE. With the launch of the Navi Mumbai departmental store, Shoppers Stop has 34 stores in
15 cities in India.
Shoppers Stop is one of the leading retail stores in India. Shoppers Stop began by operating a
chain of department stores under the name Shoppers Stop in India. Shoppers Stop has 35
stores across the country and three stores under the name Home Stop.
Shoppers Stop retails a range of branded apparel and private label under the following categories
of apparel, footwear, fashion jewellery, leather products, accessories and home products. These
are complemented by cafe, food, entertainment, personal care and various beauty relatedservices.
Shoppers Stop launched its e-store with delivery across major cities in India in 2008. The
website retails all the products available at Shoppers Stop stores, including apparel, cosmetics
and accessories. Shoppers Stop opened stores in Amritsar, Bhopal and Aurangabad.
Shoppers Stop retails products of domestic and international brands such as Louis Philippe,
Pepe, Arrow, BIBA, Gini & Jony, Carbon, Corelle, Magppie, Nike, Reebok, LEGO, and Mattel.
Shoppers Stop retails merchandise under its own labels, such as STOP, Kashish, LIFE and
Vettorio Fratini, Elliza Donatein, Acropolis etc. The company also licensees for Austin Reed
(London), an international brand, whos men's and women's outerwear are retailed in India
exclusively through the chain. In October 2009, Shoppers Stop has bought the license for
merchandising Zoozoo the brand mascot for Vodafone India.
n April 2008, Shoppers Stop changed its logo and adopted the mantra "Start Something New
mantra. And introduced international brands like CK Jeans, Tommy Hilfiger, FCUK, Mustang,
and Dior across the stores. The focus of the reposition was on the service, ambience upgradation
and customer connect. Shoppers Stop connects with the youth audience through adopting the
communication routes relevant to youth, up the fashion quotient through merchandising, and
create ambience that connects with the mindset. The brand campaign addresses environment-
related issues in a youthful, tongue-in-cheek manner. Shoppers Stop as a brand active on social
media marketing platforms with Facebook and Twitter to connect with this audience.
Merchandising opportunities like the launched Zoozoo merchandise and film merchandise.
Shoppers Stops has a loyalty program called First Citizen. They also offer a co-branded credit
card with Citibank for their members.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
21/53
Board of Directors:
Year 2010:
The Board of Directors comprises often members including one executive director and nine non
executive directors. The Company has a non executive promoter Chairman and the number ofindependent directors is one half of the total number of Directors. The independent directors on
the Board are professionals, technocrats and retail experts, who are senior, competent and highly
respected persons from their respective fields and provide strategic direction and thrust to the
operation of the Company.
The key decisions are taken after detailed deliberations and discussions by the Board. The
Company always ensures that Board members are presented with all the relevant information on
vital matters affecting the working of the Company including the information as interalia
specified under Annexure - IA of clause 49 of the Listing Agreement.
None of the Directors on the Board is a Member on more than ten Committees and Chairman of
more than five Committees (as specified in Clause 49), across all the companies in which they
are Directors.
The composition of the Board of Directors, their attendance at Board Meetings during the year
and at the last Annual General Meeting and the number of other Directorships and Committee
Memberships held by them in other Companies are given below:
Name of Directors Category Designation
Mr. Chandru L. Raheja Promoter & Non- ExecutiveDirector Chairman
Mr. Ravi C. Raheja Promoter & Non- Executive
Director
Director
Mr. Neel C. Raheja Promoter & Non- Executive
Director
Director
Mr. B. S. Nagesh Non Executive Director Vice Chairman
Mr. Gulu L. Mirchandani Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
Mr. Shahzaad S. Dalal Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
Prof. Nitin Sanghavi Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Mr. Deepak Ghaisas Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
Mr. Govind Shrikhande Executive Director President & CEO
Mr. Nirvik Singh Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
22/53
In year 2009:
The Board of Directors comprises of ten members including two executive directors and eight
non executive directors. The Company has a non-executive promoter Chairman and the number
of independent directors is one half of the total number of Directors. The independent directors
on the Board are professionals, technocrats and retail experts, who are senior, competent andhighly respected persons from their respective fields and provide strategic direction and thrust to
the operation of the Company.
The key decisions are taken after detailed deliberations and discussions by the Board. The
Company always ensures that Board members are presented with all the relevant information on
vital matters affecting the working of the Company including the information as interalia
specified under clause 49 Annexure - IA of the Listing Agreement.
None of the Directors on the Board is a Member on more than ten Committees and Chairman of
more than five Committees (as specified in Clause 49), across all the companies in which he is aDirector.
The composition of the Board of Directors, their attendance at Board Meetings during the year
and at the last Annual General Meeting and the number of other Directorships and Committee
Memberships held by them in other Companies are given below:
Name of Directors Category Designation
Mr. Chandru L. Raheja Promoter & Non- Executive
Director
Chairman
Mr. Ravi C. Raheja Promoter & Non- ExecutiveDirector
Director
Mr. Neel C. Raheja Promoter & Non- ExecutiveDirector
Director
Mr. B. S. Nagesh Non Executive Director Vice Chairman
Mr. Gulu L. Mirchandani Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Mr. Shahzaad S. Dalal Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Prof. Nitin Sanghavi Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
Mr. Deepak Ghaisas Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Mr. Govind Shrikhande Executive Director President & CEO
Mr. Nirvik Singh Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
23/53
In year 2008:
The Board of Directors comprises ofnine members including two executive directors and seven
non-executive directors. The Company has a non-executive Chairman and the number of
independent directors is more than one third of the total number of Directors. The independent
directors on the Board are professionals, technocrats and retail experts, who are senior,competent and highly respected persons from their respective fields and provide strategic
direction and thrust to the operation of the Company.
The key decisions are taken after detailed deliberations and discussions by the Board. The
Company always ensures that Board members are presented with all the relevant information on
vital matters affecting the working of the Company including the information as inter-alia
specified under clause 49 Annexure - IA of the Listing Agreement.
None of the Directors on the Board is a Member of more than ten Committees and Chairman of
more than five Committees (as specified in Clause 49), across all the companies in which he is aDirector.
The composition of the Board of Directors, their attendance at Board Meetings during the year
and at the last Annual General Meeting and the number of other Directorships and Committee
Memberships held by them in other Companies are given below:
Name of Directors Category Designation
Mr. Chandru L. Raheja Promoter & Non- Executive
Director
Chairman
Mr. Ravi C. Raheja Promoter & Non- ExecutiveDirector
Director
Mr. Neel C. Raheja Promoter & Non- ExecutiveDirector
Director
Mr. B. S. Nagesh Non Executive Director Managing Director
Mr. Gulu L. Mirchandani Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Mr. Shahzaad S. Dalal Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Prof. Nitin Sanghavi Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
Mr. Deepak Ghaisas Independent & Non-Executive Director
Director
Mr. Govind Shrikhande Executive Director Chief Executive Officer
Mr. Nirvik Singh Independent & Non-
Executive Director
Director
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
24/53
Board Composition= No. of independent director/ Total board size
In year 2010 = 5/10 = 0.5
In year 2009 = 5/10 = 0.5
In year 2008 = 4/9 = 0.44
Market Based Measures for the company:
Calculating Tobins Q:
= Market capitalization+ Book Value of Total Debt
Book Value of total assets
For year 2010 = 0.26
For year 2009 = 0.31
For year 2008 = 0.26
Market capitalization= total share * market price (Rs. In millions)
For year 2010 = 64,80,870* 586.12= 379.86
For year 2009 = 80,43,005* 384.95= 309.62
For year 2008 = 7,26,890* 243.28= 17.68
Book value of depth value= Loan funds (Rs. In millions)
For year 2010 = 19,141,08
For year 2009 = 20,776.31
For year 2008 = 1729.31
Book Value of total Assets= Net Block+ investment+ current assets (Rs. In millions)
For year 2010 = 27,099.56+11,967.45+35,496.78= 74,563.79
For year 2009 = 23,550.60+9,744.56+35,087.68 = 68,382.84
For year 2008 = 2175.16+807.21+3602.18= 6584.55
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
25/53
Final measures of year (Rs. In millions)
2009-10
Outstanding Shares as on 31st march 2010 64,80,870
Average Price 586.12
Book Value of Total Assets 74,563.79
Book Value of Total Debt 19,141,08
Tobins Q 0.26
2008-09
Outstanding Shares as on 31st march 2009 80,43,005
Average Price 384.95
Book Value of Total Assets 68,382.84
Book Value of Total Debt 20,776.31
Tobins Q 0.31
2007-08
Outstanding Shares as on 31st march 2008 7,26,890
Average Price 243.28
Book Value of Total Assets 6584.55
Book Value of Total Debt 1729.31
Tobins Q 0.26
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
26/53
Correlation between Board Size and Tobins Q
Column
1
Column
2
Column
1 1
Column2 0.5 1
The correlation value between Tobins Q and Board Size comes out to be 0.5. This shows there
is a prepositional correlation between Board size and Tobins Q for the company. So, as the
board size will increase, the companys performance will improve.
The reason for this can be that the board size was 9 in 2008 and it remains same for the next two
consecutive years 2009 and 2010 with 10 board members. There is a drastic change in year 2009
and there is a big growth, in fact the market value of firm increases. This is made correct by the
company by increasing its board size in the next year lead the company to growth.
Regression between Tobins Q and Board Composition
Coefficients
Intercept 0.076666667
X Variable 1 0.416666667
Y = A + BX
So, the equation thus formed is:
Y = 0.416666667X + 0.076666667
This low value of slope shows that in a board size that if we try to increase the number of
independent director, it does not really effect the growth of company because the company needssufficient board members to manage the work which is lacking in case of this company. And the
very less value of intercept clearly shows that without independent directors the companyperformance is nothing.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
27/53
Jaypee Business School
A constituent of Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University
A-10, Sector 62, Noida (UP) India 201 307
www.jbs.ac.in
Corporate Governance &Social Responsibility
Company Name: Pantaloons
Submitted by:
Kapil Ahuja 06503871
Ankur Garg 06503872
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
28/53
COMPANY PROFILE
Pantaloon Retail (India) Limited, is Indias leading retailer that operates multiple retail formats
in both the value and lifestyle segment of the Indian consumer market. Headquartered in
Mumbai (Bombay), the company operates over 16 million square feet of retail space, has over
1000 stores across 73 cities in India and employs over 30,000 people.
The companys leading formats include Pantaloons, a chain of fashion outlets, Big Bazaar, a
uniquely Indian hypermarket chain, Food Bazaar, a supermarket chain, blends the look, touch
and feel of Indian bazaars with aspects of modern retail like choice, convenience and quality and
Central, a chain of seamless destination malls. Some of its other formats include Brand Factory,
Blue Sky, aLL, Top 10 and Star and Sitara. The company also operates an online portal,
futurebazaar.com.
Future Value Retail Limited is a wholly owned subsidiary of Pantaloon Retail (India) Limited.
This entity has been created keeping in mind the growth and the current size of the companysvalue retail business, led by its format divisions, Big Bazaar and Food Bazaar.
The company operates 120 Big Bazaar stores, 170 Food Bazaar stores, among other formats, in
over 70 cities across the country, covering an operational retail space of over 6 million square
feet. As a focussed entity driving the growth of the group's value retail business, Future Value
Retail Limited will continue to deliver more value to its customers, supply partners, stakeholders
and communities across the country and shape the growth of modern retail in India.
A subsidiary company, Home Solutions Retail (India) Limited, operates Home Town, a large-
format home solutions store, Collection i, selling home furniture products and eZone focussed on
catering to the consumer electronics segment.
Pantaloon Retail is the flagship company of Future Group, a business group catering to the entire
Indian consumption space.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
29/53
Future Group
Future Group, led by its founder and Group CEO, Mr. Kishore Biyani, is one of Indias leading
business houses with multiple businesses spanning across the consumption space. While retail
forms the core business activity of Future Group, group subsidiaries are present in consumer
finance, capital, insurance, leisure and entertainment, brand development, retail real estatedevelopment, retail media and logistics.
Led by its flagship enterprise, Pantaloon Retail, the group operates over 16 million square feet of
retail space in 73 cities and towns and 65 rural locations across India. Headquartered in Mumbai
(Bombay), Pantaloon Retail employs around 30,000 people and is listed on the Indian stock
exchanges. The company follows a multi-format retail strategy that captures almost the entire
consumption basket of Indian customers. In the lifestyle segment, the group operates Pantaloons,
a fashion retail chain and Central, a chain of seamless malls. In the value segment, its marquee
brand, Big Bazaar is a hypermarket format that combines the look, touch and feel of Indian
bazaars with the choice and convenience of modern retail.
The groups specialty retail formats include supermarket chain - Food Bazaar, sportswear retailer
- Planet Sports, electronics retailer - eZone, home improvement chain -Home Town and rural
retail chain - Aadhaar, among others. It also operates popular shopping portal -
www.futurebazaar.com.
Future Group believes in developing strong insights on Indian consumers and building
businesses based on Indian ideas, as espoused in the groups core value of Indianness. The
groups corporate credo is, Rewrite rules, Retain values.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
30/53
Board of directors
2007-08 2008-09 2009-10
Name Type Name Type Name Type
Mr. Kishore Biyani Executive
Promoter
Mr. Kishore Biyani Executive
Promoter
Mr. Kishore Biyani Executive
Promoter
Mr. Gopikishan Biyani Non-
executive
Promoter
Mr. Gopikishan
Biyani
Non-executive
Promoter
Mr. Gopikishan
Biyani
Non-executive
Promoter
Mr. Rakesh Biyani Independent
Non
executive
Mr. Rakesh Biyani Independent
Non executive
Mr. Rakesh Biyani Independent
Non executive
Mr. Shailesh
Haribhakti
Independent
Non
executive
Mr. Shailesh
Haribhakti
Independent
Non executive
Mr. Shailesh
Haribhakti
Independent
Non executive
Dr. Darlie Koshy Independent
Non
executive
Dr. Darlie Koshy Independent
Non executive
Dr. Darlie Koshy Independent
Non executive
Mr. S. Doreswamy Independent
Non
executive
Mr. S. Doreswamy Independent
Non executive
Mr. S. Doreswamy Independent
Non executive
Mrs. Bala Deshpande Independent
Non
executive
Mrs. Bala
Deshpande
Independent
Non executive
Mrs. Bala
Deshpande
Independent
Non executive
Mr. Anil Harish Independent
Non
executive
Mr. Anil Harish Independent
Non executive
Mr. Anil Harish Independent
Non executive
Mr. V. K. Chopra Independent
Non
executive
Mr. V. K. Chopra Independent
Non executive
Mr. V. K. Chopra Independent
Non executive
- - Mr. Vijay Biyani Executive
Promoter
Mr. Vijay Biyani Executive
Promoter
- - - - Mr. Kailash Bhatia Executive
Promoter
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
31/53
Corporate Governance issue
a) Increasing No. of executive board of directors
b) Increasing No. of board of directors
Tobins Q
Pantaloons Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Year 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08
Share Price(A) Rs. 390.10 Rs. 157.60 Rs. 427.00
No. Of outstanding
Share(B)
15,30,718 38,985 15,777
Market Cap(C=A*B) Rs. 59,71,33,091.80 Rs. 61,44,036.00 Rs. 67,36,779.00
Total Liabilities(D) Rs. 22,49,64,00,000.00 Rs. 37,41,78,00,000.00 Rs. 28,11,86,00,000.00
Total Assets(E) Rs. 51,02,54,00,000.00 Rs. 61,50,76,00,000.00 Rs. 47,43,91,00,000.00
Tobin's Q((C+D)/E) 0.45 0.61 0.59
Board Composition
Pantaloons Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Year 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08
Size Of Board(A) 11 10 9
No. of Ind. Dir.(B) 6 6 6
Board Comp. Ratio(C=B/A) 0.55 0.60 0.67
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
32/53
Regression analysis of Tobins Q with Board Of composition
Pantaloons Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Year 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08
Size Of Board(A) 11 10 9
No. of Ind. Dir.(B) 6 6 6
Board Comp. Ratio(C=B/A)X 0.55 0.60 0.67
Tobin's Q(B)Y 0.45 0.61 0.59
Regression slope(m) 1.11
Regression intercept(c) -0.12
Regression Line equation y=1.11x-0.12
Here intercept is -0.12 which shows that we decrease no. of independent directors to zero thanTobins Q value will be negative which reflects that firms performance will become negative
when there are no independent directors. The executive director always thinks about family
benefits not in the direction of firm benefits. So there must be independent director who can
protect shareholders interest.
Similarly slope is equal to 1.11 which is more than 1 i.e. if we reduce no. of independent
directors or decrease in boards composition than it will reduce Tobins Q in same amount. It
shows that change in boards composition will directly affect firms performance.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
33/53
Correlation b/w Tobins Q with size of board
Pantaloons Retail Pvt. Ltd.
Year 2009-10 2008-09 2007-08
Size Of Board(A) 11 10 9
Tobin's Q(B) 0.45 0.61 0.59
Correlation -0.82
As it shows that increasing board size reduces the firm performance. They are negatively
correlated.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
34/53
Jaypee Business School
A constituent of Jaypee Institute of Information Technology University
A-10, Sector 62, Noida (UP) India 201 307
www.jbs.ac.in
Corporate Governance &Social Responsibility
Company Name: Bombay Dyeing
Submitted by:
Anshul Pachauri 06503861
Ankur Saxena 06503880
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
35/53
COMPANY PROFILE
Bombay Dyeing established 1879) is the flagship company of the Wadia Group, engaged mainly
into the business of Textiles. Bombay Dyeing is one of India's largest producers of textiles. Its
current chairman is Nusli Wadia.
Bombay Dyeing was often in the news, apart from other things, for various controversies
surrounding its tussle with the late Dhirubha Ambani of Reliance Industries Limited and
with Calcutta based jutebaron Arun Bajoria.
The company sponsors many events, including Bombay Dyeing Gladrags Mrs. India contest.
Since the first store in 1879 and the only store manager, the growth has not only been in our
presence, but also in of how much we offer today. Stylish linens, towels, home furnishings,
leisure clothing, kids wear and a whole blissful range of other products are now available across
350+ exclusive Bombay Dyeing Retail or 2000+ Multi-brand Stores.
All products come with our hallmark finish, great textures, detailed design to match the latest
trends and fine quality which has been synonymous with Bombay Dyeing for over a century.
Delivering the best designer products at an outstanding value for money has always been our
motto and forte.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
36/53
Board of Directors
In year 2008:
The board is headed by by the non-executive chairman, Mr. nusli N. Wadia, and is composed of
eminent persons with considerable professional experience in diverse fields and comprises amajority of Non-Executive directors. Over two thirds of its board consist of Non-Executive
Directors and these the majority are independent directors. The details are given blow:
Total no. of directors = 13
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
37/53
In year 2009:
The board is headed by by the non-executive chairman, Mr. Nusli N. Wadia, and is
composed of eminent persons with considerable professional experience in diverse fields and
comprises a majority of Non-Executive directors. Over two thirds of its board consist of
Non-Executive Directors and these the majority are independent directors. The details aregiven blow:
Total no. of directors = 14
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
38/53
In year 2010:
The board is headed by by the non-executive chairman, Mr. Nusli N. Wadia, and is
composed of eminent persons with considerable professional experience in diverse fields and
comprises a majority of Non-Executive directors. Over two thirds of its board consists of
Non-Executive Directors and these the majority are independent directors. The details aregiven blow:
Total no. of directors = 12
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
39/53
Regression Analysis
Year Tobins Q Board
Composition
Total Board
Size
2008 0.96 0.25 132009 0.81 0.42 14
2010 1.06 0.46 12
Coefficients
Intercept 0.915563003
X Variable1
0.073726542
The equation of the regression comes as Y=0.91+.07X
Y= Tobbins Q
X= Board Composition
It shows that if we increase the board composition which means that the number of independent
directors should be more than previous, the Tobbins Q will also increase which implies positive
relationship with the firm performance.
The slope is 0.91, when implies that the firm is able to perform to a very good extent even if
there is no independent director. The firm definitely remains undervalued. If we desire the firmto perform at the optimum level i.e Tobbins Q value should reach 1.
Desired Board composition: 1.28, which means that definitely, the number of independent
directors should be more than the board size which is not possible in any case.
Co-Relation Analysis
Column
1
Column
2
Column1 1
Column
2
-0.9934 1
The above co-relation table clearly shows that there is negative co-relation between Board Size
and the firm performance. If the Board Size increases, the firm performance degrades. The same
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
40/53
is implied from the regression analysis too. The board size and the Tobbins Q are inversely
proportional.
Definitely, the Bombay Dyeing should look into to decrease the Board size, but on the same they
should also bring more number of independent directors on the Board.
CEO Duality
For the three consistent years, the Ness Wadia is the son of the Chairman Mr. Nulsi Wadia is the
Joint Managing Director of the company which definitely doesnt showcase the direct CEO
duality. But as both of the designation belongs to the family members, the family seems to be
more powerful in controlling the company as a whole.
Board Composition
There is one interesting note in the Board of the Directors that Mr. Kesubh Mahindra, thepromoter of Mahindra Group is there in the board as the independent director which
compiles to many issues. There issues are that Mahindra Group and the Bombay Dyeing
both are sharing some common business motive which is not shown to the public.
Mr. P. V. Kuppuswamy retired as the Joint Managing Director of the Company effective
31st March, 2010. Mr. P. V. Kuppuswamy during his tenure of 28 years with the
Company, including 16 years as a Director.
The information about the every meeting attended, remuneration policy and the all
designations of the Board members are mentioned in the annual reports the firm.
Clause 49
Pursuant to Clause 49 of the Listing Agreement a Management Discussion and Analysis Report
is given in the Annual Company Report. Moreover, the separate section on the corporate
governance is also disclosed in the annual report of the firm.
Companys Philosophy on Code of Governance:
Your Company is fully committed to the principles of good corporate governance. In keeping
with this commitment your Company has been upholding fair and ethical business and corporate
practices and transparency in its dealings and continuously endeavors to review, strengthen and
upgrade its systems and processes so as to bring in transparency and efficiency in its various
business segments.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
41/53
Remuneration Policy:
Payment of remuneration to the Joint Managing Directors is governed by the respective
Agreements executed between them and the Company. Their Agreements are approved by the
Board and by the shareholders. Their remuneration structure comprises salary, incentive,
commission linked to profits, bonus, benefits, perquisites and allowances, contribution toprovident fund, superannuation and gratuity. The Non-Executive Directors do not draw any
remuneration from the Company other than sitting fees and such commission as may be
determined by the Board from time to time.
The Agreements with the Joint Managing Directors are for a period of five years. Either party to
the Agreement is entitled to terminate the Agreement by giving not less than six calendar
months prior notice in writing to the other party; provided that the Company shall be entitled to
terminate the incumbents employment at any time by payment to him of six months salary in
lieu of such notice.
The Company has not granted any stock options to whole-time Directors during the year. No
stock options which were granted in previous years to whole-time Directors were outstanding for
vesting or for exercise at the beginning of the year.
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
42/53
Appendix
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
43/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
44/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
45/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
46/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
47/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
48/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
49/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
50/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
51/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
52/53
-
8/7/2019 CGSR project final
53/53