ch03 - aronson

Upload: mahfuzul-haque

Post on 03-Jun-2018

274 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    1/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-1

    Chapter Three

    Social Cognition andSocial Perception: How

    We Perceive and Think

    about the Social World

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    2/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-2

    People as Everyday Theorists:

    Schemas and Their Influence

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    3/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-3

    Schemas and Their Influence

    Social Cognition:

    How people select, interpret, remember, anduse social information

    Social Perception:

    How we form impressions of and make

    inferences about othersAllow us to make complex judgments very

    rapidly, however can also lead to mistakes

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    4/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-4

    Schemas and Their Influence

    Schemas:

    Mental structures people use to organizeinformation about the social world

    Schemas affect what we:

    Notice

    Think about

    Remember

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    5/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-5

    Schemas and Their Influence

    We have schemas for:

    People Ourselves

    Social roles

    Objects Events

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    6/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-6

    Schemas and Their Influence

    Carli (1999) Jack & Barbara Study:

    Participants read story involving a couple

    At end of story, the man either proposed to or rapedthe woman

    Proposal scenario: Participants incorrectly remembered facts consistent with a

    proposal schema (e.g., he gave her roses) Rape scenario:

    Participants incorrectly remembered rape-consistent facts(e.g., he liked to drink)

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    7/63

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    8/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-8

    Applications: Social Psychology in the

    Courtroom

    Story order:

    Lawyers present evidence in order itoccurred

    Want to create a story the jury will believe

    Witness order:

    Lawyers present witnesses in the sequencethat will have greatest impact, even if eventsout of order

    Which order is most effective?

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    9/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-9

    Applications: Social Psychology in the

    Courtroom

    Pennington and Hastie (1990):

    Mock trial with Prosecutor story order/Defense witness order:

    78% conviction rate

    Researchers argue:

    US conviction rate in felony trials (80%) is so high

    because prosecutors use story order, defenders

    use witness order

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    10/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-10

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Accessibility:

    Extent to which schemas are at the front ofour minds and therefore likely to be used in

    making judgments

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    11/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-11

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Two kinds of accessibility:

    Chronic accessibility:

    Due to past experience

    Traits describing alcoholism chronicallyaccessible if you were raised by alcoholics

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    12/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-12

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Temporary accessibility:

    Whatever happens just prior to an event canmake schemas accessible

    Happens through priming

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    13/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-13

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Priming:

    When a recent experience increasesaccessibility of certain traits, making it likely

    that we will use those traits in interpreting

    someones behaviour

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    14/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-14

    Insert Figure 3.1 Here

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    15/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-15

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Higgins, Rholes and Jones (1977):

    Unrelated second study paradigm Perception study: memorizing list of

    words

    Positive condition: adventurous, self-confident Negative condition: reckless, conceited, aloof

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    16/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-16

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Higgins, et al. (1977) cont.:

    Reading comprehension study: Read aboutDonald and gave impressions of him

    How did participants interpret Donalds

    behaviour?

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    17/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-17

    Insert Figure 3.2 Here

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    18/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-18

    Which Schemas are Applied?

    Accessibility and Priming

    Higgins, et al. (1977) cont.:

    Positive prime condition: Formed impressions of Donald as likeable, and

    enjoying new challenges

    Negative prime condition:

    Formed impressions of Donald as stuck up andone who took needless chances

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    19/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-19

    Mental Strategies and Shortcuts:

    Heuristics

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    20/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-20

    Mental Strategies and Shortcuts:

    Heuristics

    How do you make typical decisions? Do you:

    Conduct a thorough search of every optionavailable?

    Weigh pros and cons of each alternative?

    Or do you:

    Use mental strategies and shortcuts to save timeand effort?

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    21/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-21

    Mental Strategies and Shortcuts:

    Heuristics

    Judgmental heuristics:

    Mental shortcuts people use to makejudgments quickly and efficiently

    Reliance on heuristics however does not:

    Always lead to accurate inferences

    Always lead to the best decision

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    22/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-22

    How Easily Does it Come to Mind? The

    Availability Heuristic

    Availability:

    How easy or difficult it is to bring a schema orconcept to mind

    Availability heuristic:

    Mental rule of thumb whereby people base

    judgments on the ease with which they can

    bring something to mind

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    23/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-23

    How Similar is A to B? The

    Representativeness Heuristic

    Representativeness Heuristic:

    Mental shortcut whereby people classifysomething according to how similar it is to a

    typical case

    Base rate information:

    Information about the frequency of members

    of different categories in the population

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    24/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-24

    How Similar is A to B? The

    Representativeness Heuristic

    Kahneman and Tversky (1973): Engineer and

    lawyer problem Read description of Jack, a man drawn

    from pool of: 70 engineers and 30 lawyers

    30 engineers and 70 lawyers Description of Jack

    Stereotypic engineering traits (careful, likes math)

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    25/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-25

    How Similar is A to B? The

    Representativeness Heuristic

    Kahneman and Tversky (1973) found that

    participants: Based estimates on trait information

    Judged him just as likely to be an engineer

    when there were 70 as when there were 30

    Ignored base rate information

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    26/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-26

    Taking Things at Face Value: The

    Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic

    Anchoring and adjustment heuristic:

    Mental shortcut whereby people use anumber or value as a starting point andadjust their answer away from this anchor

    People often fail to adjust sufficiently away

    from the anchor People often use completely arbitrary

    anchors

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    27/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-27

    Try It! Reasoning Quiz

    1. Consider the letter R in the English language. Do you thinkthat this letter occurs more often as the first letter of words(e.g., rope) or more often as the third letter of words (e.g.,park)?

    a) The first letter

    b) The third letter

    c) About equally often as the first and third letter

    Answer: b) the third letter. Most people think the answer is a)

    because of the availability heuristic

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    28/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-28

    Try It! Reasoning Quiz

    2. Which of these do you think causes more fatalities in Canada?

    a) accidental death

    b) death from strokesc) each causes about the same number of deaths

    Answer: b) strokes (16,051 per year).People assume a) accidental death (8,626 per year) is correct

    because media reports of accidents make them moreavailable.

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    29/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-29

    Try It! Reasoning Quiz

    3. Suppose you flipped a fair coin six times. Which sequence ismore likely to occur?

    a) HTTHTH

    b) HHHTTT

    c) Both sequences are equally likely

    Answer: c) Both are equally likely. People assume the answeris a) because that sequence looksmore random(representativeness heuristic).

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    30/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-30

    Try It! Reasoning Quiz

    4. After observing the sequence TTTTT, what is the probability thatthe next coin flip will be heads?

    a) less than 0.5b) 0.5

    c) greater than 0.5

    Answer: b) 0.5. People assume that the answer is c) because

    they feel that after five tails in a row, a flip of heads is morelikely. This gamblers fallacy is the belief that prior randomevents can influence subsequent random events. The fallacy islikely due to the representativeness heuristic

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    31/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-31

    Automatic Versus Controlled Thinking

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    32/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-32

    Automatic Versus Controlled Thinking

    Automatic processing:

    Thinking that is nonconscious, unintentional,involuntary, and effortless Automatically stereotyping people

    Controlled processing:

    Thinking that is conscious, intentional,voluntary, and effortful Wondering whats for lunch?

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    33/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-33

    Automatic Versus Controlled

    Thinking

    Gilbert (1991, 1993, 1998): Automatic Believing

    Seeing is believing Initially believe everything as a default

    Need to unaccept when necessary

    When tired or distracted, can accept

    falsehoods

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    34/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-34

    Insert Figure 3.3 Here

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    35/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-35

    Application: Is Automatic Thinking

    Lethal?

    Correll et al. (2002) Police video game study:

    Have to determine whether or not to shoot atarget who is either:

    White or Black

    Armed or unarmed

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    36/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-36

    Application: Is Automatic Thinking

    Lethal?

    Correll et al. (2002) found:

    Participants more likely to shoot at blacktargets, whether or not they were armed

    Shooter bias likely rooted in stereotyped

    beliefs about black men

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    37/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-37

    Causal Attribution: Answering the

    Why Question

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    38/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-38

    The Nature of the Attributional Process

    Attribution theory:

    A description of the way in which peopleexplain the causes of their own and other

    peoples behaviour

    Fritz Heider (1958): People can make either

    Internal attributions

    External attributions

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    39/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-39

    The Nature of the Attributional Process

    Internal Attribution:

    Assigning the causality of a personsbehaviour internally Behaviour is due to personality, disposition, etc.

    External Attribution:

    Assigning the causality of a personsbehaviour externally Behaviour is due to situations, environment, etc.

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    40/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-40

    Applications: Adjusting to College or

    University Life

    Wilson and Linville (1982, 1985):

    Noticed students attribute first year difficulties

    internally (personal inadequacies)

    Showed students videos of older students talking

    about how common first year problems are

    Found: Students in treatment group improved grades

    more and were less likely to drop out than control

    group

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    41/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-41

    The Fundamental Attribution Error:

    People as Personality Psychologists

    Fritz Heider (1958): People tend to prefer

    internal attributions over external ones

    Fundamental attribution error:

    Tendency to overestimate the extent to which

    peoples behaviour is due to internal,

    dispositional factors and to underestimatethe role of situational factors

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    42/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-42

    The Fundamental Attribution Error

    Jones and Harris (1967) Castro essay study:

    Had students read essay either supporting oropposing Fidel Castros rule in Cuba

    Told that the essay writer either had

    Free choice of which side to take

    No choice

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    43/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-43

    The Fundamental Attribution Error

    Later asked participants to estimate the

    writers true attitude

    Found people ignored choice manipulation

    People assume arguments are indicative of

    writers opinion, even when the writer had no

    choicein what to write

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    44/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-44

    Insert Figure 3.4 Here

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    45/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-45

    Blaming the Victim

    Fundamental attribution error can lead us to

    blame victims of crimes for their plight

    Walster et. al: People tend to blame rape

    victims for the attack

    Summers and Feldman (1984): Battered

    wives are seen as responsible for husbandsbehaviour

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    46/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-46

    The Role of Perceptual Salience

    Why do we commit the fundamentalattribution error?

    Situational causes of anothers behaviour arevirtually invisible to us

    We focus attention on people, notsurrounding situation

    Often we dont have situational informationavailable to us

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    47/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-47

    The Role of Perceptual Salience

    Perceptual salience:

    Information that is the focus of peoplesattention

    People tend to overestimate the causal role

    of perceptually salient information

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    48/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-48

    The Role of Perceptual Salience

    Taylor and Fiske (1975) Perceptual salience

    study:

    Six participants watched two confederateshave a conversation

    Researchers manipulated perceptual

    salience by either Making one speaker visible, one not

    Making both speakers visible

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    49/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-49

    Insert Figure 3.5 Here

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    50/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-50

    The Role of Perceptual Salience

    Taylor and Fiske (1975) found:

    The person participants could see best wasthe one judged to have the most active role

    in the conversation

    If participants could see both, they rated both

    as equally influential on the conversation

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    51/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-51

    The Role of Culture

    Western culture emphasizes the individual

    and socializes us to prefer dispositional

    attributions

    Eastern cultures emphasize interdependence

    and socializes people to prefer situational

    attributions

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    52/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-52

    The Role of Culture

    Morris and Peng (1994):

    Study of articles in Chinese and English-language newspapers

    Two similar mass murders

    Chinese graduate student in Iowa

    Caucasian postal worker in Michigan

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    53/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-53

    The Role of Culture

    Morris and Peng (1994):

    Coded articles about the two crimes inChinese vs. U.S. newspapers

    Found: U.S. newspaper made significantly more

    dispositional attributions for both crimes

    U.S. newspaper used terms like sinister edgeand disturbed man, Chinese paper stressedkillers isolation from the Chinese community

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    54/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-54

    The Actor/Observer Difference

    Our use of the fundamental attribution error

    applies more to the behaviour of others than

    to our own behaviour

    Actor/observer difference:

    Tendency to see other peoples behaviour as

    dispositionally caused, while our ownbehaviour is seen as more situationally

    caused

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    55/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-55

    The Actor/Observer Difference

    Why do people show the actor/observer

    difference?

    Perceptual salience

    We notice our own situation more than our

    behaviour

    Information availability Actors have more information about themselves

    than observers do

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    56/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-56

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Sometimes our biased processing has a

    motivational basis

    As a result, we use attributions that protect

    our self-esteem and our belief in a just world

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    57/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-57

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Self-serving attributions:

    Taking credit for our successes (internalattribution)

    Blaming others or situations for our failures

    (external attribution)

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    58/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-58

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Attributions and sports performance:

    Lau and Russell (1980) found: 80% of attributions made by coaches and players

    for winning performances were internal

    Roesch and Amirkhan (1997) found:

    Less experienced athletes were more likely tomake self-serving attributions than experienced

    athletes

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    59/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-59

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Self-serving attributions lead people to:

    Believe their actions are rational anddefensible

    Believe that the actions of others are

    unreasonable and unjustified

    Remember their own contributions to groupwork better than contributions of others

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    60/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-60

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Defensive attributions:

    Explanations for behaviour that defend usfrom feelings of vulnerability and mortality

    Unrealistic Optimism:

    Form of defensive attribution in which we

    believe good things are more likely tohappen to us than to others

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    61/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-61

    Self-Serving Attributions

    Belief in a just world (Lerner, 1980):

    Form of defensive attribution in which weassume that bad things happen to bad

    people and good things happen to good

    people

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    62/63

    2006 Pearson Education Canada3-62

    Critical Thinking Questions

    Schemas may improve efficiency, but what

    costs are associated with using schemas?

    How might high school students use the

    availability, representativeness, and

    anchoring and adjustment heuristics whenmaking decisions about college or university

    applications?

  • 8/12/2019 Ch03 - Aronson

    63/63

    Critical Thinking Questions

    In what way is automatic thinking beneficial,

    and in what way is it harmful?

    When we are threatened, we often try to

    comfort ourselves through our belief in a just

    world. How might this defensive attributionhave operated in the aftermath of the events

    of September 11?