chad carmack aaron martin ryan mayer jake schaefer abhi murty shane mooney ben goldman russell...
Post on 19-Dec-2015
214 views
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Chad CarmackAaron MartinRyan MayerJake SchaeferAbhi MurtyShane Mooney
Ben GoldmanRussell HammerDonnie GoepperPhil MazurekChris SimpsonJohn Tegah
AAE451 Conceptual Design Review
Team 2
![Page 2: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Conceptual Design Outline
2
Mission SummaryConcept SummaryBest DesignAdvanced Technologies ReviewSizing CodeEngine ModelingAerodynamicsPerformanceStructuresStability and ControlNoiseCostSummary
![Page 3: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Mission Statement
3
To be the primary systems integrator of a high speed, long range executive transport system with unprecedented efficiency and minimal environmental impact.
![Page 4: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Design Mission
4
0-1: Take off to 50 ft. 5-6: Climb to
5000 ft. (Best Rate)
1-2: Climb to 41000 ft. (Best Rate) 6-7: Divert to
Alternate 200 nm
2-3: Cruise at Mach 0.85 7-8: 45 minute
Holding Pattern
3-4: Decent to Land (No Range Credit) 8-9: Land
4-5: Missed Approach (Go Around)
3
0 1
2
4 5
6 7
8 97100 nm 200 nm
Los Angeles Hong Kong Alternate
![Page 5: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Concept Review
5
![Page 6: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Aircraft Concept Walk-Around
6
• Lifting Canards
•Fuselage – aft Mounted Engines
•Noise ShieldingVertical Stabilizers
Noise ShieldingLow Wing
Circular Fuselage
Spiroid Wing-Tips
![Page 7: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Major Design Parameters
7
Parameter Value
Thrust / Weight Ratio
0.34
Aspect Ratio 12
Wing Loading 87 (lb/ft2)
Wing Area 796.4(ft2)
Wing Span 97.8 (ft)
Canard Area 147.4 (ft2)
Canard Span 36.4 (ft)
![Page 8: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Scale Three View
8
![Page 9: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Interior Cabin Arrangement
9
![Page 10: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Cabin Amenities and Features
10
List of Amenities / Features
Four Passenger Conference Seating
One Galley
One-Conference Table One-Cocktail Galley
Conference-Computer Table Two-Lavatories
Pull Down Projector Screen Twenty -28”x18” Windows
Six-Reclining Seats One-Pilot Rest Area
Two -3 Passenger Sofa Seats Two-Reclining Crew Seats
Two-Shared Tables
Maximum Passengers: 16 Volume / Passenger max cap.: 150 (ft3)
![Page 11: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Cabin Layout and Dimensions
11
![Page 12: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Lifting Canard
Pros Cons
12
Designed to provide more lift at high speeds
Reduces induced drag at cruise
May allow for smaller main wing
Downwash from canards has large effect on main wings
Stability demands that canard stall before main wing, therefore main wing never reaches full lift potential
![Page 13: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Canard & N+2
13
The canard design had a smaller empty weight, but had a larger fuel burn which implies worse total drag performance
![Page 14: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Vertical Stabilizer
14
Two vertical stabilizers are placed directly on the wings to shield the engines. The intent was to reduce the noise signature of the aircraft.
![Page 15: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Engine Mounting
15
Two engines mounted in rear of the fuselage for reliability and thrust requirements
The benefit of mounting the engines above the wing and surrounded by vertical stabilizers will keep noise levels low.
![Page 16: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Cabin Considerations
16
Stand up cabin in the aisle to accommodate the “plush” comfort level
Crew areas expanded to allow sleeping quarters for reserve pilot
Two lavatories and galley necessary for full passenger load
![Page 17: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Summary of Advanced Concepts
17
Geared Turbofan15% reduction in fuel burnNoised lowered to approximately 20 dB
below stage 450% below CAEP-6 emissions
Composites20% reduction of structural weight
Spiroids
![Page 18: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Spiroid Wingtips
18
• 6-10% drag reduction in cruise flight• Yielded a 10% improvement in fuel
burn• Installed on more than 3,000 aircraft,
including several business jet types, as well as the Boeing 737 and 757 airliners
• Aid the US Federal Aviation Administration in increasing airspace capacity near airports
• Potential for large decreases in wake intensity. This could substantially alter the requirements for separation distances between lead and following aircraft in airport traffic patterns
http://www.flightglobal.com/blogs/flightblogger/2008/06/spiroid-wingtip-technology-the.html
![Page 19: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
MATLAB Code Flowchart
19
Initial Guess Wo
Geometry Calculatio
ns
We Prediction
Engine Model
Drag Calculation
Wfuel Prediction
W0 Calculation
W0 = W0 calc
Set W0 guess to W0 calc
![Page 20: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Calibration Factors
20
• Calibrated Canard design to Beechcraft Starship
Weight Conventional
Canard
Fuel Weight 0.89 0.89
Empty Weight 1.16 0.96
Gross Weight 1.03 0.98
![Page 21: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Technology Factors
21
Composites reduced structural weight by 20%
Spiroids reduced SFC drag by 10%Canards reduce induced drag (assume 5-
10%)Geared turbofan reduced fuel burn (SFC) by
15%Application Tech Value
WStructure 0.80
Di (canard only)
0.93
SFC 0.75
![Page 22: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Carpet Plots - Conventional
22
• Best AR = 10 => W0 = 76000 lbs
• Limited by top of climb (100 ft/min @ 41k ft) and takeoff distance (4000 ft)
8 8.5 9 9.5 10 10.5 11 11.5 127
7.2
7.4
7.6
7.8
8
8.2
8.4
8.6
8.8
9x 10
4
W0
AR
Aspect Ratio vs W0 for Conventional a/c
![Page 23: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Carpet Plots - Canard
23 Limited by top of climb (100 ft/min @ 41k ft) and takeoff distance (4000 ft)
10 10.5 11 11.5 12 12.5 13 13.5 146.5
7
7.5
8x 10
4
AR
W0
Aspect Ratio vs W0 for Canard a/c
![Page 24: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Canard Sizing Summary
24
AR = 12T/W = .34W0/S = 87W0 = 71,300 lbsWempty = 38,000 lbsWfuel = 31,500 lbsLanding ground roll = 2200 ftTakeoff ground roll = 3900 ft
![Page 25: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Drag Prediction
25
Component drag build up based on four types of dragDrag: pressure, induced, miscellaneous, and waveComponents: pylons, engines, fuselage, wings, etc.
Induced drag is a sum of that produced by both the main wing and canard, with the canard contributing its own downwash onto the main wing
Viscous effects are not strong enough to damp out the downwash over the distance between the canard and main wing
![Page 26: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Drag at Cruise
26
CD = kCD,p + TF*CD,i + CD,misc + CD,w
= 1.05CD,p + TF*CD,i + CD,w
= 0.01661 + 0.01002 + 0.00002
• CD,cruise = 0.02665
![Page 27: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Wing Airfoil Selection
27
Required Cl
Takeoff: 1.2Cruise: 0.46Landing: 2.0
Supercritical Airfoil useComparison of RAE 2822
to NASA SC(2)-0610.NASA airfoil would provide
higher lift but have a greater moment.
NASA SC(2)-0610 selected for wing design.
Geometry and comparison from http://www.worldofkrauss.com/
![Page 28: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Flap Selection
28
Regular flap vs Single slotted Flap
Higher lift, but more complex
Can meet required lift of 2.0 with only single slotted flap
http://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19750064451_1975064451.pdf
![Page 29: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Tail airfoil Selection
29
Small operating range for angles of attack.
Laminar flow foil selected to reduce drag.
Symmetrical airfoil.
NACA 64(2)-015 was selected for use.
![Page 30: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Canard airfoil
30
Symmetric Supercritical airfoil was desired for the canard
![Page 31: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Engine Modeling
31
Engine Deck similar to CF-34Generated with ONX/OFFX
Scaled From Data SheetBased on required thrust
![Page 32: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Engine Description
32
Geared TurbofanSea Level Static Thrust: 11,900 lbBypass Ratio: 12:1
![Page 33: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Mission Modeling
33
Calculated fuel weight for individual mission segments
3
0 1
2
4 5
6 7
8 97100 nm 200 nm
250 lbs 125 lbs
1350 lbs
25200 lbs
280 lbs
130 lbs
2700 lbs
1400 lbs
280 lbs
![Page 34: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
V-n DiagramAircraft limited by Clmax at low speeds and by the
structure at high speedsDesign speed for max gust same as cruse speed
due to Clmax at altitudeManeuver load factor
nmax = 2.5nmin = -1
Gust load factorns_max = 2.63ns_max = -1.13
Dive MachMd = .87
![Page 35: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
V-n Diagram
35
![Page 36: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Payload Range Diagram
36
0 1000 2000 3000 4000 5000 6000 7000 8000 90000
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500Payload Range Diagram
Range (nmi)
Pay
load
Wei
ght
(lbs)
*Mach = 0.85 Altitude = 41,000 feet Still air range
![Page 37: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 5500
0.5
1
1.5
2
x 104
Velocity (kts)
Thr
ust
(lbf)
Thrust Required Curve at Sea Level
Thrust Required
Thrust Available
Thrust Curves at Sea Level
37
![Page 38: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
250 300 350 400 450 500
2000
2500
3000
3500
4000
4500
Velocity (kts)
Thr
ust
(lbf)
Thrust Required Curve at 41000 feet MSL
Thrust Required
Thrust Available
Thrust Curves at Cruise
38
![Page 39: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Structural Overview
Landing Gear Supporting Structure
Fillets
Fillets
Fillets
Fillets
Main Spar
Door Sills
Pylons Supported by Bulkheads/
Beams
Window Sills
Frames
Longerons
Shear Webbing
![Page 40: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Structural Load Paths
![Page 41: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Structural Highlights
41
![Page 42: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Material Selection Process
42
Static Dissipation and Electrically Conductive
Icephobic CoatingsMaintenanceCostDensity and Fatigue Resistance
![Page 43: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Materials
43
Silicones Ability to maintain its elasticity and low modulus over a broad
temperature range provides excellent utility in extreme environments Protection against static accumulation and discharge
Composites Light and very strong but maintenance is an issue and is expensive No Established data
Aluminum Lower cost Easier certification Established maintenance
Steels Used mainly in the landing gear
Advanced Alloys Higher elastic modulus Density savings
![Page 44: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Aircraft Components
44
Fuselage skins and wing stringers - Aluminum Alloys Better Fatigue Crack Growth (FCG) performance reduces
structural weight.
Canard, Control surfaces and wing skin panels – Glare Composites Resistant to damage at high temperatures
Landing gear – Steel Alloy High strength, corrosion resistant
Nose, Leading and Trailing edges - Carbon fiber-reinforced polymer (CFRP) Lighter than titanium
Higher fracture toughness and yield strength
![Page 45: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Static Longitudinal Stability
45
Assuming symmetry about the centerline, changes in angle of attack no influence on yaw or roll of aircraft.
To achieve stability in pitch, any change in angle of attack must generate resisting moments.
Static Margin = (Xnp – Xcg)c.g. must be ahead of the neutral point in order to be stableTypical transport aircraft: 5-10%
Fuel CG [%fusela
ge]
SM[%
chord]
Full 68.3 18.3
Empty
62.0 85.8
Xcg
Xnp
![Page 46: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Control Surface Sizes
46
Control Surface
Surface Area [ft2]
Rudder 10 x 2
Aileron 15
Elevator 35
Raymer Table 6.5 – Elevator SizingRaymer Figure 6.3 – Aileron Sizing
![Page 47: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Noise Estimation
47
The MethodAssumed that engine is primary noise sourceEvaluated noise due to exhaust and fanObtained EPNL values with a few
approximations:Altitude at 6000m from runway after TakeoffAltitude at 2000m from runway before LandingVolumetric Flow RateTemperaturePressure
![Page 48: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Noise Estimation
48
The ProcessFind sound power of each sourceConvert to sound power level (SWL)Calculate sound pressure level (SPL) based on SWL
and distance from sourceAssumes spherical wave propagationAdjust for A-weighted SPL
Calculate dominant tonal frequencyConvert to Noy based on SPL and dominant tonal
frequency using equal loudness contoursSum Noy for both the exhaust jet and fanConvert from Noy to PNLCalculate EPNL based on PNL
![Page 49: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Noise Estimation
49
The ResultsEPNL dB prediction for engine models without
airplane noise shielding
Geared Turbofan
Unducted Fan
Sideline 97 102
Takeoff 90 95
Approach 97 100
![Page 50: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Noise Estimation
50
Noise estimation for installed Geared Turbofan in EPNL dB
Stage 4 - total 274 EPNL dB
Location Airplane Noise [EPNL dB]
Sideline 87
Takeoff 80
Approach 87
Total 254
![Page 51: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Cost: Purchase Price
51
Production run of 150 aircraft assumedBased on comparable aircraft, projected market
growthRAND DAPCA IV Model
CERs prepared from statistical cost dataPredicts RDT&E and flyaway costs
Engine costs estimated separatelyGTF in appropriate thrust class assumed to exist in
2020
![Page 52: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Cost: Purchase Price
52
Engineering
Tooling
Manufacturing
Quality Control
Development Support
Flight Test
Manufacturing Materials
Engine Cost
Avionics Cost
Investment Cost Factor
Production Run
Aircraft Purchase Price
$1,250,000,000
$764,000,000
$2,186,000,000
$355,000,000
$210,000,000
$44,700,000
$886,000,000
$3,610,000
$1,820,000
10%
150 airframes
$49,700,000
(2009 dollars)
![Page 53: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Cost: Operations and Maintenance
53
Included expenses and assumptions:Utilization: 500 hours per year – 200 cyclesFuel Costs
Price: $4.50/gallon Jet ACrew salaries
Three crew on average flight, paid per block hourEstimated using CERs from Boeing data
Maintenance (labor and materials)MMH/FH: 3Materials costs estimated using RAND CERs
InsuranceHull Insurance Rate: 0.32%
DepreciationAverage 10% of airframe value per year
![Page 54: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Cost: Operations and Maintenance
54
FuelCrewMaintenance laborMaintenance materialsInsuranceDepreciation
Total Cost (No Depreciation)
Total (Depreciation)(500 flight hours per year)
$1,510/hr
$714/hr
$282/hr
$619/hr
$136,000/yr
$4,250,000/yr
$3,400/hr
$8,500/hr
(2009 dollars)
![Page 55: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Summary
![Page 56: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Requirements Compliance Matrix
56
Performance Characteristics
Target Threshold Current
Still Air Range 7100 nm 6960 nm 7100 nm
MTOW Takeoff Ground Roll 4000 ft 5000 ft 3900 ft
Max. Passengers 16 8 16
Volume per Passenger per Hour (Design)
13.3 ft3/(pax⋅hr) 2.28 ft3/(pax⋅hr) 20.7 ft3/(pax⋅hr)
Cruise Mach 0.85 0.8 0.85
Initial Cruise Altitude 41000 ft 40000 ft 41000 ft
Cumulative Certification Noise Limits
274 dB 274 dB 254 dB
Cruise Specific Range 0.3 nm/lb 0.26 nm/lb 0.31 nm/lb
Loading Door Sill Height 4 ft 5 ft 5 ft
Operating Cost $4100/hr $4300/hr $3400/hr
![Page 57: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Summary of N+2 Goals
57
Criteria Goal Our Aircraft
Achieved
Noise -42 dB below Stage 4
-20 dB No
Emissions -75% -50% No
Fuel Burn -40% -25% No
Takeoff Field Length
-50% -33% No
![Page 58: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Plausibility
58
Not CurrentlyN+2 goals are difficult to meetWorth pursuing
Significant improvements over current performance possible
![Page 59: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Additional Work
59
• Structural Analysis• Fatigue and temperature analysis• Sizing of spars and ribs
• Aerodynamic Analysis• CFD• Wind Tunnel Testing
• Manufacturing process• Engine
• Boundary layer ingestion
![Page 60: Chad Carmack Aaron Martin Ryan Mayer Jake Schaefer Abhi Murty Shane Mooney Ben Goldman Russell Hammer Donnie Goepper Phil Mazurek Chris Simpson John Tegah](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022032800/56649d2e5503460f94a0586f/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Questions?