challenges in aligning workplace learning with business ... · pdf fileaustralian journal of...
TRANSCRIPT
Australian Journal of Adult Learning Volume 50, Number 2, July 2010
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals:
A perspective from HRD professionals in New Zealand
Tom ShortUniversity of South Australia
Roger HarrisUniversity of South Australia
Modern organisations have become more complex, less mechanistic and increasingly sensitive to rapid changes in the external environment than in previous eras. Today, executives lead employees through a maze of complexity and changing contexts. However, another group of dedicated professionals, the human resource managers and practitioners, also play a big part in shaping business success. For human resource managers, learning how to cope with a diverse range of people-centred challenges has generated a succession of workplace development initiatives aimed at aligning education and training with business strategy (Anderson 2009). In the knowledge economy, the value of workplace
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 359
education and training has become a mantra for business survival. Simultaneously, in response to a requirement for change, the human resource management (HRM) profession has engaged in frequent and often inward-looking processes to re-define its own contribution, not only to the effectiveness of an enterprise but also to the individual employee and wider community. Within this evolution, in some organisations, the traditional sub-areas of HRM, such as human resource development (HRD), have gradually become detached from mainstream HRM and assumed a role quite different in both purpose and approach to from the more hegemonic notion of resources management. This paper draws insights from a group of senior HRD professionals in New Zealand to review the significance of workplace learning in a strategic context and identify the challenges the profession faces in meeting the demands of complex workplaces. The paper focuses on how HRD professionals go about aligning learning activities with business objectives—often with mixed results.
Introduction and background
Inrecentyears,humanresourcemanagement(HRM)practiceshavegrownsystematicallytobecomefirmlyembeddedwithinabusinessmindset(Boxall&Purcell2003,Elsey1997),yetbycontrast,humanresourcedevelopment(HRD)activitieshaveevolvedtoperchawkwardlybetweenthemore-establisheddisciplinesofbusiness,educationandsocialpolicy(Short2009).Intheacademicworld,HRDspecialistsare‘strugglingfortheirownspaceandfreedom,distinguishingthemselvesfromHRMorvocationaleducation’(Sambrook2004:617).HRDprofessionalshave‘longsearchedforcredibility’(Iles,Preece&Chuai2010:125)andmuchhasbeenwrittenaboutthechallengesHRDfaces,primarilykeepingthefieldrelevant,adoptingmorestrategicapproaches,embracingtechnologicalchangesandmeasuringitscontribution
360 Tom Short and Roger Harris
toorganisationalperformance(McGuire&Cseh2006).ItsgradualevolutionhasbothgeneratedopportunitiesandcreatedlimitationsforHRDresearch.Inbecomingwedgedbetweenmainstreamacademicdisciplines,HRDcanbeperceivedasfertilegroundandanattractiveplaceforappliedstudy;ontheotherhand,thispositioningcanalsobeinterpretedasbeinginthedisciplinarywilderness,resultinginalackofinterestfrompuristsonallsidesandadilutingoftheimportanceofHRDasastrategicareaofinterest.
Partofthisresponsecomesfromtherecurrenttensionsofideologybetweenthedisciplines.TheunfortunateresultisthatHRDofferingsbecomeoverlookedbytopexecutivesorsubsumedasalessimportantactivityofHRM,andthissituationbecomesmostevidentwhenanorganisationre-alignsitsstrategyinordertocopewithever-changingmarketcompetitionanddemand.SomeorganisationshaveamplifiedthisestrangementbyplacingHRMinacentralised,corporateservicewhiledevolvingHRDtolinemanagement.Therearetwokeyimplicationshere.First,itrelegatestheidentityofHRDtowardstheoperationallevelofabusiness;andsecond,itassumesthatlinemanagersareequippedwiththeknowledge,skills,motivationandtimetoorganiseworkplacetraining.Moreover,Sambrook(2004)foundthat,whenlinemanagerswerekeentoacceptautonomyonHRDdecisions,atensiondevelopedaboutthepurposeofHRD—thatistosay,whowouldbenefitmost,theindividualortheorganisation?Asaconsequence,manyHRDpractitionershavebecomeresignedtotheirrelegatedstatuswithincorporateaffairs,butthislackofrecognitionhasimpactedadverselyontheirprofessionalidentityasworkplaceeducatorsandmayevenhaveinhibitedtheircareerdevelopment.
Historically,workplacedevelopmentprojectshavebeenamongthefirstcasualtiesofrationalisation,especiallysofterskillprograms,whereevaluationsofbenefitsarehardertosourcethanstraightforward,practical,skill-basedtraining.Yet,evenbeforethe
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 361
widespreaduptakeofHRDinthemid-1980s,workplacelearningandtrainingwasseenasasub-activityofpersonneldepartments(Buckley&Caple1990).Asaresult,anorganisation’scommitmenttotraininganddevelopmentwasverymuchdependentonthepersonnelmanager’senthusiasm.Inspiteofever-increasingtrainingbudgets,present-dayresearchshowsanongoingandtenuousexistenceforworkplacedevelopment,inthatonlyasmallpercentageoftheUK’sFTSEtop100organisationshaveahumanresourcesrepresentativeatboardroomlevel(Manocha2006).Suchever-presentdilemmascreatemanychallengesforHRDprofessionalswhobelievetheircontributiontoworkplaceperformanceisspecial,notonlyintermsofenrichmentofpeoplebutalsotothelonger-termdevelopmentoftheorganisationandwidercommunity.
Therearetwofactorstoconsiderhere. First,despitetherepeatedassertionsofHRMadvocatesthattrainingshouldbefullyintegratedintobusinessstrategy(Guest1987,Purcell1989,Story1989,Hendry1995,Tyson1997,Mueller1996,Elsey1997,Boxall&Purcell2003,Field2004),thecontributionofHRMasagenuinestrategicactivitycontinuestodominatestudies,thoughsometextsindicatethatHRDisawell-establishedconceptwithinthewiderfieldofHRM(Sambrook2009,Wang,Hutchins&Garavan2009).Second,despiteglobalincreasesintrainingbudgets,thereremainsongoingdoubtatboardroomlevelaboutthepositiveconnectionbetweenworkplacelearningactivities(oftenincludedinthenotionofHRD)andlonger-termbusinesssuccess.Somecommentatorsbelievethattopexecutivesfailtoacknowledge,orvalue,HRDasastrategicimperativeandthissituationpresentsaninterestingparadox,becausetrainingbudgetsareeverincreasing.TheestimatedforecastfortheUKin2008was£24billionandlaterrevisedto£36billion(CIPD2008).
CommitmentfromthetopisanessentialfactorinthesuccessofHRD(Pareek&Rao2008).AccordingtoSambrook(2004:619),‘how
362 Tom Short and Roger Harris
seniormanagersthinkaboutHRDcaninfluencehowitispractised’andpartofthereasonwhyexecutivesreducetrainingbudgetssoeasilyispoorevaluationpractices.HRDprofessionalsrecognisetheimportanceofgainingfeedbackfromlearningevents,butresearchfindingscallintoquestionthethoroughnessofevaluationprocesses,claimingtheyrarelyhappentothesatisfactionofseniormanagers.Thisproblemfuelspre-existingscepticismamongseniormanagerswhoneedevidenceofthepayback(Horwitz1999,Sloman2004).Consequently,traininganddevelopmentprojectsthatareunabletodemonstrateclearalignmentwiththefirm’sobjectivesarepostponedorcancelledaltogether(Tarrant2009).TheuneasyrelationshipbetweenHRDandstrategy,therefore,meansthattraditionalapproachestoevaluationmayhavefailedtoconvincemanagers—creatinganeedtodiscoverbetterwaysofexpressingthebenefitsoftraining,ifthestrategicvalueofHRDistostrengthen.Moreover,inrecentyears,theterm‘alignment’hasgrowninuse—especiallyinthepro-HRMliterature—asadescriptivetermtosymbolisearangeofmanagement-drivenprocessesbasedonplanninganddirectingtrainingprojectstowardsstrategicgoals(Anderson2009).Thereisnoshortageofadviceonhowtoachievealignment,butsometimestheofferingsseemoverplayedandsimplistic,andtooverlooktheincreasingcomplexityoforganisationallife(Short2008b).HRDprofessionalsknowthatachievingalignmentisnotstraightforward.Forexample,inaculturallyrichsetting,alignment-basedscorecardsthatsetanobjectivisttonemayfailtorecognisethequalitativecircumstancesinwhichorganisationsdeploytheirlearningstrategies.Arguably,thenotionofalignment(inthecontextofHRD)takesamanagerialperspective(Field2004,Short2008a)andoverlooksthatorganisationsfrequentlygaincompetitiveadvantagebypursuingseveralstrategiesatthesametime(Thompson1995),thusmakingalignmentdifficulttoquantifyanddefineasauniversalentity.Consequently,confusionprevailsandalignmentdegeneratesintoamanagementdream,orperception,ratherthananachievablereality.
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 363
TheupshotisthatorganisationsusingalignmentasareasonformakingstrategicdecisionsonHRDfinditchallengingtoarticulateaccuratelywhatalignmentmeansandhowitimpactsonbusinesssuccess.
Withallthisferment,thetraditionalsub-areasofHRM,suchasHRD,havegraduallybecomedetachedinsomeorganisationsfrommainstreamHRMandassumedarolequitedifferentinbothpurposeandapproachfrom themorehegemonicnotionofresourcesmanagement.Sambrook(2010:121)suggeststhereare‘varioustitlesassociatedwithHRD’andsuchsignificantissuesareinneedofilluminationthroughresearchonactualpractice.Thispaper,therefore,drawsinsightsfromagroupofseniorHRDpractitionersinNewZealandtoreviewthesignificanceofworkplacelearninganddevelopmentandtoidentifythechallengestheHRDprofessionfacesinmeetingthedemandsofcomplexworkplaces.ThepaperexaminestheperceptionsoftheHRDpractitionersoftheirroleandprofessionalcontribution,howtheyestablishanidentityandhowtheyinfluencewhatmanagersandemployeesconsiderasimportantfororganisationstosucceed.Indoingso,itrevealsanumberofoccupationaltensionsforHRDpractitioners.
Research method
Aninterpretiveapproachhasbeenusedinthisresearch,sincethestudywasprimarilyconcernedwithperceptionsandexperiences.Aninterpretiveapproachisbasedontheviewthatpeoplesociallyandsymbolicallyconstructtheirownorganisationalrealities(Berger&Luckman1967).Itconstruesknowledgeasbeinggainedthroughsocialconstructionssuchaslanguage,sharedmeaningsanddocuments.Thustheindividualiscastas‘acentralactorinadramaofpersonalmeaningmaking’(Fenwick2001:9).Inthisway,individualsareunderstoodtoconstructtheirownknowledgethroughinteractionwithenvironments(constructivism).
364 Tom Short and Roger Harris
ThedataonwhichthispaperisbasedwerederivedfromaspeciallyconvenedfocusgroupoffivehumanresourcepractitionersinNewZealandduring2007.Thegroupwasdrawnfromaselectionoforganisationstoprovidecommentaryonarangeof HRDissuesandpractices.Noneoftheparticipantskneweachotherbeforethemeeting,butoneoftheresearchersknewtheindividualsthroughpreviousconnections.Thegroup,comprisingtwoearly-careermaleHRDmanagersandthreeseniorfemalepractitioners,hadallexperiencedHRDinaninternationalsetting.Theyweredrawnfromfiveindustrysectors,includingmanufacturing(MF),automotiveretail(AR),localgovernment(LG),commercialbanking(CB)andtertiaryeducation(TE).Theseindustrysectorswerepurposivelyselectedwiththeintentofobtainingasdiverseaspreadofviewsaspossible.
Thefocusgroupwasledbyanindependentandprofessionalfacilitator.Usingafacilitatorwithsubject-matterknowledgeaddedmuchcredibilitytothediscussion,enabledparticipantstorelatequicklytotherangeofissuesandalloweddiscussionto‘freewheel’withintherangeofquestions(seeappendix).Thediscussionwasaudio-tapedtoassistwithlateranalysisandeachmemberverifiedthewrittentranscription.Usingdesktopanalysis,thetextdatawereclusteredforthepurposeofwriting-upthefindings.Thefindingsthatfollowarestructuredaroundtenthemes.Thesethemesemergedfromtheinterviewtranscripts,interpretedfromnotestakenduringthefocusgroupandinformedbyanextensivereviewoftheliterature.Thisstrategywaschosentobestcapturetheessenceofhowgroupmembersnotonlycontributedtotheirorganisation’ssuccessbutalsoreconciledtheirownprofessionalagendaofeducatingemployeeswithinthewidercontextoflifelonglearning.(Thecodesusedafterquotationsindicatethequestionnumberandtheindustrysector).
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 365
Findings and discussion
Strategic HRD considerations in a global workplace
ThehighturnoverofemployeesinNewZealand’smobilelabourmarket,particularlyinlargecitiessuchasAuckland,raisedconcernaboutthechallengesoffinding,retaininganddevelopingcapablepeople.Thegroupdiscussedhoworganisationsmightfallbackonahistoricreluctancetoinvestintrainingiftheythoughtstaffmembersweregoingtobepoachedatalaterstage.Therewassomebeliefthisattitudeprevaileddespiteresearchtothecontraryshowingthattraininganddevelopmentactuallyhelpedinretainingemployees(SmithandHayton1999).Oneparticipantsaid:
Ithinkthereisquitealotofreluctanceouttheretodeveloppeoplesometimeswhenyouthinkthey’regoingtobepoachedifIdevelopthemtoomuch.Youknowtheoldsortofmodelwherewe’vejustinvestedalotinJim,andnowJim’sgoingsolet’snotinvestanymoreandnotmakethatmistakeagain.Thatkindofattitudestillprevailsinalotofareasandyouhavetotryandconvincethemthatinactualfacttheresearchisincreasinglyshowingthatdevelopmentisvaluedbyemployeesandthey’remorelikelytostayiftheyaredevelopedandstimulatedinthatwayandtryingtoconvincepeopleofthat.(Q3,LG)
Theneedforeconomicsurvival,growthandincreasedlevelsofcompetitivenessweresignificantconcerns,especiallythedeclineofwholeindustryinfrastructures,asincreasingnumbersofNewZealandorganisationsmovedoffshore.Inanatmosphereofsurvival,peoplerarelyconsideredthatifonecompanyfailedithadaknock-oneffectonmanyotherpartsofthesupplychain.ThegroupbelievedNewZealand,asanationofsmallbusinesses,wasparticularlyvulnerable,andthechallengewasforlargerorganisationstoseebeyondthemselves,considerhowtheycouldsupportthesmallfirms,andcreateaformofstrategicinterdependence.Guaranteesofpartnershipwouldthengivesmallfirmstheconfidencetoinvestincapitalanddeveloppeople.Buildingonthisidea,oneparticipantfromthe
366 Tom Short and Roger Harris
bankingsectorrecognisedtheneedtobecreativeanddifferentfromthecompetition.Inhisview,‘Itwouldbesoeasytogetsuckedintotherestofthepackandnobodywouldbeabletotellthedifference’(Q3,CB).Hebelievedcustomersvaluedapointofdifference—soimportantwhenattractingnewtalent.NewZealandhasarelativelysmallpooloftalent,limitingtheavailabilityofhighcalibrepeople.Inthetradeunionsector,importantchallengesincludedencouragingpeopletoseelearningaspartofthebiggerpictureandbecomingmulti-skilled.NewZealandersarealsonotoriouslylowrisk-takersandworkingpeoplerarelytakeonalearningchallengeforfearoffailureorbeingperceivedasafailure.Theemergenceoftheknowledgeeconomyhadbeenahugewake-upcallformanyworkingNewZealandersaseconomicsuccessincreasinglydependedlessonagricultureandmoreonadvancedtechnology.Themanagerconcluded:‘Inmostcases,theproblemwasnotthetechnologyitselfbutthemannerinwhichpeoplecommunicatedthedifficultiesorhelpedothersovercometheirdifficulties.’(Q3,CB).
Influences on workplace development decisions
Asorganisationsstruggletosurviveintheglobaleconomy,prioritiesareever-changingandHRDpractitionersplayanimportantroleinshapingthemanagementdecisionsontraininganddevelopment.Participantsreportedawiderangeoforganisationalissues,largelycentredonselectingthecorrectpeoplestrategy,overcomingresourceconstraintsanddrivingtheneedforperformanceimprovement.Mostly,decisionsrelatedtotrainingwerebasedonaprimaryassessmentoftheexternalenvironmentandmarket.Thisappraisalwasundertakentodeterminecustomerexpectationsonperformance,andthenexaminehowemployeescouldbestmeetthoseexpectations.Oneparticipatingmanagerfromthebankingsectorexplained:‘Welookatthebig-ticketissuesthatarepresentlyonthehorizonandintothefuture.Thenwelookinsidetheorganisationtoseewhatourcapabilitiesareinrelationtothosethings.Itisaclassicgap
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 367
closingactivity,startingwiththebigpictureandthenworkingdown’.Thompson(1995:229)referstothis‘relational’processasdealingwiththestrategic‘architecture’.Themanagercontinuedhisaccountoftheprocessasfollows:
Costissecondarytobusinessneedovertheshortertermandwhatstafftrainingwasneededtomoveforward.Inthelongerterm,itwasaboutconsideringwhatformulasworkedinthemarketplace-investigatingwhatactivitiesweregoingwellandwhatappearedlikegoodinitiativestodeployoverthemediumtolongterm.Culturalfitwasalsoanimportantpartofthisassessment,asexperiencehadshownthattraininginitiativesfailedwhentheydidnotfitwiththeorganisationalculture.(Q2,CB)
Thetertiarysectorparticipantemphasisedfinancialfactorsinrecountingthat‘inmyorganisation,allwehearaboutisbudgetsbutatthesametimeyouaresupposedtokeepyourselfuptospeedwithprofessionaldevelopmentandgetonwiththenextthing...itisreallyanissueofrhetoricversusreality’(Q2,TE).Interestingly,participants’commentsreflectedbothstrategicandoperationallevelsofdecision-makingontraining.Typically,seniorexecutivessetthreetofiveprioritiesperyearasstrategicitemstosupporttheoverallbusinessplan,butatthenextlevel,trainingwasdeterminedmorebytheengagementofoperationalline-managersandavailabilityofbudgets.
Therewaswidespreadagreementthatdecisionsontraininganddevelopmentoftenresultedfromamanagerialdesireforperformanceimprovement,atrendsupportedbyresearch(Tarrant2009).However,onefeaturethatemergedfrequentlywasthelevelofunderstandingrequiredtobringaboutperformanceimprovement.Experiencehadshownthatsomeleadersdoggedlystucktoatriedandtestedstyleofcurriculummanagementapproachandwerenotactuallyfocussedonmakingdecisionsaroundwhatmadeadifferencetoperformance,yetthiswasrequiredatastrategiclevel.
368 Tom Short and Roger Harris
SuchexperiencesupportsthefindingofRiggandTrehan(2008)whoreportedhowdifficultitistoemploycriticalreflectionwithintheworkplacebecauseofthecomplexpowerrelationsbetweenmultiplestakeholdersinacommercialcontext.Learningwasacknowledgedasakeypartofanorganisation’sdevelopmentstrategyandwasnotsomethingthatfeaturedonitsown,orhappenedtopeople.Participantsreportedthatsometimesevenhumanresourceprofessionalsdidnothavethedepthofunderstandingrequired—especiallyamongthoseappointedintohumanresourcesrolesfromotherprofessionalareas.Oneparticipantclaimed:‘AsaHRDmanager,youoftenhavetoworkforpeoplewhodon’thaveyourdepthofknowledgeandthatcanbedangerous’(Q2,LG).
Ways in which HRD practitioners add value in their organisations
ParticipantsplacedgreatimportanceonthesupportingroleofHRDinhelpingpeopletomaintainfocusandensuringalignmentwithbusinessgoals.Furthermore,itwasthoughttheabsenceofaHRDpractitionermightleadtomanagersbecomingdistractedby‘fire-fighting’activitiesand/ordealingwiththecomplexitiesofroutinework.Afterall,HRDpractitionersweretherespecificallytohelpmanagersmaketherightdecisionsintermsofdevelopmentandtoidentifyopportunitiestoleverimprovementsinperformance:
Ifyou’reaHRDpractitioner,thendevelopmentispartofyourgameandIthinkyou’rekeepingyoureyeontheballandfocusingonit—you’resupportingmanagementinthatrole.Ifyouhaven’tgotHRDpractitioners,whathappensisthateveryoneknowsit’sreallyimportantbuttheyaresobusyfightingfirestheynevergetroundtoit.SoIthinkthemainroleistokeepthingsfocusedonwhat’simportantandtomakesureHRDpractitionershelpmanagersmaketherightdecisionsintermsofdevelopmentalopportunities.(Q5,LG)
Thegroupmembersalsoacknowledgedthevitalroleofthehumanresourceprofessionalasaninternaladvisor/consultanttolinemanagement.However,theyacknowledgedthelogisticaldifficulty
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 369
ofaloneHRDpractitionerorganisingeveryaspectoflearninganddevelopmentinalargeorganisation.Theybelievedthatcoachinglinemanagerstocarryoutactivities,suchastaskanalysisandtrainingneedsanalysis,helpedtoraiseawarenessoftheneedtoidentifyperformancegaps,andensuredaconsistentleveloflearninganddevelopmentthroughouttheorganisation.However,astrongpartnershipwithlinemanagerswascentraltomakingthissuccessful.Aboveall,thegroupconsideredHRDpractitionersaspeoplewhohadacatalysingeffectonlinemanagers.Accordingtoonerespondent,‘theyinfluencedfirstandtransactedsecond’(Q5,AR).ThefollowingstatementtypifiedtheimportanceoftheHRDeffortbeingtotallyalignedwithbusinessgoals:‘Youhavetobesoinextricablylinkedthatyouaresuchapartofthebusinesstheydon’tseeyou’(Q5,AR).Thegroupconcludedthatthislevelofintegration(thatis,workingbehindthescenes)hadtobevaluedatalllevelsintheorganisation.
Alignment of workforce development with business strategy
Discussionfocusedonthepopularconceptofdevelopinghumancapital(Boxall&Purcell2002)asthebasisforahumanresource,service-ledmodel,buttheyconsideredthisideaassomewhattransactionalandfundamentallydifferentfromthephilosophyoflearninganddevelopment.Someofthegrouphadworkedinhumanresourcedepartmentswheretrainingwasviewedassomeoneelse’sproblemandwhereworkwasinappropriatelycontractedoutinthenameofefficiency.Onerespondentproclaimed:‘Ithinkthatlearninganddevelopmentstrategieshavetobetalkingaboutpeople—notresources,bitsofcardboardorasortofdisembodiedsomething.Ialwayssay,youmanageresourcesbutyouleadpeople’(Q6,TE).
Atanorganisationallevel,therewasagreementthatlearninganddevelopmentactivitiesshouldfocusonthewholebusinessaswellasthecomponentparts.Thissuggestionreflectsthesystematicorholisticapproachandsupportstheideaofworkinginclosepartnershipwiththoseresponsiblefordevelopinganddeploying
370 Tom Short and Roger Harris
thebusinessstrategy.Participantsconsideredhowhumanresourcefunctionsinlargerorganisationshadbecometooremote.Somebelievedlearninganddevelopmentmanagerswereperceivedassubservienttothehumanresourcesfunctionandexamplesweregivenofhowhumanresourcesdepartmentshadinitiatedtrainingwithoutfirstconsultingthelearninganddevelopmentpractitioners,creatingmuchconfusionandmisalignment:
Quiteoften,they’re[HRstaff]offrunningcoursesforAfrica[everywhere],butwhatdoesithavetodowithanythingelse?Youcanactuallyfindtheyarerunningprogramswiththebestofintentionthatactuallydonotalignatall.Ithinktheonlywayyoucanspecificallyalignistocarryonwithapartnershipatahighlevelandalwaysgobacktowhatthebusinessstrategyisforthefuture.Iftheydonotcontribute,thendonotdothem…itisthatstraightforward.(Q6,LG)
Thenotionoflearninganddevelopmentactivitybeingphilosophicallydifferentfromthatofpersonnel-relatedworkisaninterestingoneandcloselyassociatedwiththecreationofhumanresourcemanagementaswehavecometoknowit.Uptothelate1970s,trainingandpersonneldepartmentswereoftenseenastotallydifferentdisciplines,buttheadventofHRMinthe1980ssoughttomeldthesetwoactivitiestogetherforthebettermentofbothprofessions.Overtheyears,thisunitaryvalueofpersonnelortraininghasbeendebatedinglobalstudies(Cunningham&Hyman1999),butinthisfocusgroup,itseemedtheHRDpractitionerswerefeelingcompromisedandinhibitedfrommakingafullcontributiontothewiderstrategyonhumanresourcemanagement.Simplyput,someoftheHRDprofessionalsinthefocusgroupfeltlessvaluedthantheirHRMcounterparts.However,oneparticipantfromthemanufacturingsectorthoughthavingroleseparationwasadvantageousattheoperationallevelandgaveanexampleofhowinternalhumanresourceconsultantsandlearninganddevelopmentprofessionalshadworkedinpartnershiponaperformancemanagementissue—human
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 371
resourcestaffdealingwiththedisciplinaryaspectsandlearninganddevelopmentstafffacilitatingalearning-centredsolution.Inthisexample,theorganisationalstructureinfluencedroleboundaries—withhumanresourcesreportingtoacentralservicefunctionandHRDtolinemanagement.
What employees value
TheHRDpractitioners,intheirworkwithinorganisations,frequentlybecameinvolvedintheimplementationoforganisationaldevelopmentactivitiesthataimedtopromoteandsustainavalue-drivenculture.Fromthisexperience,participantscommentedonwhattheythoughtemployeesvaluedintheirrespectiveorganisation.Thepurposeofthisquestionwastoidentifyhowgroupmembersunderstoodandreconciledemployeevalueswiththeirownandthoseoftheorganisation.Asummationoftheparticipants’viewsindicatedthatcareerprogressionandfairlevelsofremunerationfeaturedstronglyinemployeeengagementsurveysasvaluedemploymentpractices.Additionally,formalandinformalcommunicationswereconsideredasimportantprocessesforprovidingfeedbacktoemployees.Participantshighlightedthatinformalfeedbackhelpedtoembedcommunicationsintotheorganisationatanaturallevel.Incomparisonwiththepast,newentrantshadamuchhigherexpectationfromtheiremployer,especiallyonworkplacecommunicationsystems,workplacedemocracyandstructuredfeedbackmechanisms.Thiscontrastedsharplywithlongerservingmanagers,whomaynothaveexperiencedthesameapproachtocommunicationsearlierintheircareers.Youngpeopleenteringtheworkforcetoday,oftenreferredtoasGenerationY,seemedtocravecommunicationsandfeedback,especiallyonindividualperformanceandprogression(MacLeod2008).Thegroupbelievedthislevelofpersonalvalidationwasimportant,asemployeeswerequicktocriticiseleaderswhodidnotadapt—seeingpoorcommunicationsasasignofmanagementincompetence.
372 Tom Short and Roger Harris
Increasingly,peopleatanylevelintheorganisationstructurewerethoughttovalueaworkinglifethatdevelopedinparallelwiththeirpersonalidentity.Forexample,theyasked,‘DoesthisorganisationhelpmefeelgoodandclarifywhereIamgoing?’(Q1,TEandRB).Alltoofrequently,managerswerereportedtobenotgoodatcommunicatingthevision,valuesandoverallobjectivesoftheirorganisation.Employeesalsovaluedbeingabletotrusttheirorganisationwastreatingthemfairly.Oneparticipantcommentedthat‘managerscangetawaywithalmostanythingaslongastheyareperceivedasbeingfair.Ifitis[consideredtobe]fairandconsistent,thenemployeesareusuallywillingtodowhatisaskedofthem,withinreason’(Q1,CB).Thisviewsuggeststhatperceptionsoffairnessareanimportantfactorinthelevelofemployeelenienceonpotentiallycontentiousissuesandreinforcesthenotionofpsychologicalcontracting.Issuesmightincludeunexpectedchange,workre-organisationortheimpositionofnewrules.Inotherwords,whenmanagersdemonstrateabeliefintheirpeopleandareperceivedasbeingfair,employeesrespondwithunobstructedconsentonmostinitiatives,aspeoplearehappytogobeyondthelimits.However,thislenienceisfragileandarevealingexamplewascitedbytheparticipantfromthemanufacturingsectorwhosaidthat,whenmanagementtookaunilateraldecisiontoimposethewearingofsafetyhatsinthefactory(afterreportsofafatalaccidentinanotherorganisation),workersdidnotseetheneedforthisrulingandtookexceptiontothewayinwhichtherulewasbeingenforced.Theparticipantrecalledoneemployeesaying:
Ablanketrulewasmadethatweshouldwearhardhats.Therewasabsolutelynodiscussionandforusitwasabittoughbecausewewerenotusedtowearingahelmet.Weareallintosafety,butitwasablanketrule…eveninareaswherenothingcouldfallonyourhead.They[management]saiditwasforourownsafety,butwebelieveditwasjusttocoverthemandnotworryaboutus.Noonecares,Ineverusedtosweatbefore…butnowmyheadisdrippinganditiscausingirritatingrashes.(Q1,MF)
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 373
Overall,thefocusgroupmembersagreedthathard-earnedgoodwillcouldbeerodedveryquicklybythreefactors:managerinconsistency,internalpolitickingandthepresenceofavacuumincommunications.Intheorganisationsoftheseparticipants,engagementsurveysandintranetfeedbacktestedthelevelofemployeecommitmentbyaskingindividualsarangeofquestions,includingtheextenttowhichtheywouldgotheextramile.
Evaluation of learning
ThefocusgroupparticipantsreportedaheavyrelianceontheuseoftheKirkpatrickmodelofevaluationintheirorganisationsandalloftheparticipantswereabletoarticulatethewell-knownfourlevelsofevaluation:reaction,learning,behaviourandresults(Kirkpatrick1996,Parry1997).Therewasrecognitionthatcomputer-basedtechnologyhadmadeitmucheasiertocollectevaluationdata,butthemainchallengewasfindingthetimetoanalyseandinterpretthem.
Thesizeofthetraininginvestmentwasanimportantconsiderationbutpresentedaparadoxicalsituation.Forexample,evaluationsoftrainingprojectsthatdirectlyaffectedbusinessperformancewereconsideredamuchhigherprioritythansmallertrainingactivities,yetthesetrainingprojectswerereportedasbeingthemostdifficulttoevaluate.Furthermore,organisationaldevelopmentprogramsoftenraninparallelwithseveralotherprojects,makingithardertoisolateandevaluatethebenefitsofanyonetraininginterventioninaneffectiveandtimelyway.Poorinitiationoftrainingprojectspresentedanotherreasonwhyevaluationwasdifficult.Thegroupsuggestedthatunderstandingthebusinessdriversfirstandthenbuildingperformancemeasurementintotrainingneedanalysesmightofferamorereliableplatformforassessingtrainingoutcomesandthecorrespondingvaluetotheenterprise.
Ithinkitdependsonthesizeoftheinitiativeandwhatyouaretryingtoprovebyit.Youcanspendanawfullotofenergyonevaluatingaprogram.Idefinitelythinkonthe‘bigticket’
374 Tom Short and Roger Harris
itemsitisworthplanningfortheevaluationanddoingsomemeasurementbeforeyoustarttheinitiative,soyoucanshowtheaddedvalueafterwards.Wesometimesthinkwearemakinganimpactbut,whenyoulookattheresults,wearenot.(Q7,LG)
Onerespondentexplainedthat‘gaininggenericimprovements,throughcollaborativeworkingwithmanagers,oftenmeantthat“non-curriculum”trainingwasundertakenspontaneously’,makingitmoredifficulttoderiveafixedmodelofevaluation(Q7,AR).Sometimes,HRDinterventionsfocusedontheaffectivedomainoflearning(suchassecuringengagement),soasuccessfultrainingoutcomemightbebeneficialtoadiverserangeofperformanceindicators.Forexample,oneparticipantacknowledgedthedifficultyinposingthisquery:‘Howdoyoumeasurethatcoachingsomebodytogivefeedbackisgoingtoimprovetheirabilitytogivefeedbackuntilwegetthenext[employee]engagementresult,whichmaybearesultofsomethingelse?’(Q7,AR).SuchcommentstypifytheinherentcomplexityofaligningHRD,especiallywhentryingtobalancetheneedsandlearningoutcomesofspecifictrainingprojectswiththelongertermgoalsoftheorganisation.
Anotherdimensionofevaluationrelatedtotheformalversusinformallearningenvironmentandtheorganisation’sculturetowardspeopledevelopment.Thegroupconsideredtheseissuestobeimportantbecausetheyhadadirectbearingonhowleadershipvaluedemployeesandhowindividuallearningneedswereaccommodatedintheprocessofongoingperformancecoaching.Thegroupagreedthatlearningcontinuedirrespectiveoftheorganisation’sintent,butthiscouldhaveapositiveordetrimentaleffectonalignment.Thisperspectivesuggeststhat,inmostcircumstances,itishelpfultocaptureandrecognisetherelevantinformallearning,oftenemanatingfromtacitexperienceacquiredatworkoroutsideofemployment.
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 375
Barriers to learning
Therewasauniversalacceptanceinthefocusgroupthatleanorganisationalstructuresandbusinesspressuresfrequentlymadeitdifficulttoreleaseemployeesforformaltrainingcourses.Lackofadvocacybyandsupportfromlinemanagersmadeitaneasyoptionforpeopletowithdraw.Fromthediscussion,thereappearedtobeampleevidenceofstrongrhetoricbyseniormanagersaboutpeopledevelopmentandperformancereviews,butoperationalrequirementsfrequentlygotintheway.Evenmoredisturbingwasthesuggestionthatseniormanagerswereamongtheworstoffendersandthisreflectedpoorrolemodelling.However,thecurrenttrendtowardsflatterorganisationalstructuresmadeiteasiertoobservewhethertopmanagementwassupportinglearning-relatedprojects:
Ireckonlackofadvocacyiswhereitcounts.Ifyou’retryingtodosomethingwhereeveryoneisagreeing—sotherhetoric’sthere,youknow,yeswedoagreethatyoushouldhaveaperformanceimprovementprocessinplace,yesweshouldhaveperformancereviews…[however]whenyou’redrivingsomekindofinitiativethatthosepeoplethatareatveryseniorlevelifthey’renotrightinbehindit,ifthey’renotfilteringthroughtherightinformationtotheirdirectreports,thenyou’reindeep[trouble].(Q8,AR)
Thefocusgroupthoughtthatthosepeoplewhoputupbarrierstolearningwereoftenthesameindividualswhofailedtounderstandthetruevalueoflearning.Typically,theysoughtquickfixsolutionsandcouldnotseethateffectivelearningtakestime.Forsome,theirtraditionalperceptionoflearningemanatedfromschoolanduniversity.Theyunderstoodtheroleoftrainingbutdidnotfullyappreciatethechangeoflanguagetowardsamoredistinctnotionofadultlearning.Inthisregard,HRDmanagersfrequentlystruggledtochangethemindsetoftheircolleaguesandthisresistancestemmedfromtheorganisationculture.
376 Tom Short and Roger Harris
Finally,thegroupdiscussedanemerginglearningbarriermorespecificallyrelevanttothoseolderworkerswhostruggledtoseeanybenefitfromtraining.Therewasgeneralacknowledgementthatthisgroupofpeoplehadexperiencedintensiveorganisationdevelopmentoverthelasttwodecades,oftenwithlittleornodirecttraining.Somehadexperiencedlossofemploymentormadelateralcareertransitionsandcarriedaresultantlowesteem.Conversely,thegroupdiscussedhowotherlong-servingemployeesmightbevictimsofmisalignmentwhentheirorganisationschangedstrategicdirection.Ironically,changesinthedemographicmixofsocietymeanttheoverallageofemployeeswouldincreasesignificantlyintheyearsahead.
Employer recognition of tacit knowledge and experience
Onerecurringthemewithinthefocusgroupdiscussionwastheimportanceofapartnershipapproachtolearninganddevelopmentandthecomponentpartsofthisprocessincludedablendofdirecttraining,individualcoachingandongoingprofessionaldialoguewithteamleadersandhumanresourcepractitioners.Thefocusgroupbelievedthatidentifyingandutilisingtacitknowledgeorextra-murallearningwasanimportantrequirement,becauseunderstandingthevalueoftacitknowledgeandusingperformance-basedcoachingmodelstomaximisethisinformationwouldencouragestaffretention.Peoplewouldmorereadilyappreciatethealignmentbetweentheirownobjectivesandthoseoftheirorganisation.Furthermore,thefocusgroupmembersrecognisedthatformalmentoringprogramsandinformalmentoringactivitieshadbeensuccessfullyusedintheirorganisationsasawayofdisseminatingtacitknowledgetolessexperiencedstaff:
Ithinkthatperformancemodelsworkwellintermsofthecoachingmodelandyou’vegotyourindividualwiththeirownskillneedsandtheirownobjectivesandtheirownmissionandpurposeandyou’vegottheorganisation’s;ifyou’vegotthatalignmentthroughgoodcoaching,thentheymaynotleave.If
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 377
they’regoingtoleaveinfiveor10yearstime,thenyou’vehadthebenefitoftheirservicesforthattimeandtheymaywellcomebackorhavefosteredotherrelationshipswiththeorganisation.(Q9,MF)
Thecontradictionbetweenrhetoricandrealityoftencreatedincongruencebetweentheplanningofformalandthatofinformallearning.Insomesituations,suchasbusinessre-structuringprograms,employeescontinuedtolearnirrespectiveofwhattheorganisationwantedthemtolearn,butsuchlearningdidnotalwaysalignwiththebusinessstrategy.Itwasthoughtthecompetitivemarketsofthe1990shadforcedorganisationsselfishlytodirecttheirlearningactivitiestowardsbusinessgoals,butindoingso,hadneglectedthebroaderneedsofsociety.Itwasrecognisedenterprisesexistedwithinawidercommunityandorganisationsthatvaluedlearningquicklybuiltanexternalreputationforvaluingtheirpeople.Overall,theHRDfocusgroupmembersconsideredtheirorganisationswereweakatrecognisingandutilisingtacitknowledge.Thosethatdidattempttoharnessthefullextentoftacitknowledgedevelopedablackholeofunmanageabledatathatwasneverminedandused.Equally,organisationswerereluctanttoinvestinextra-murallearningthatdidnotofferanydirectbenefittothebusiness.Thoseorganisationsthatpaidforextra-muralstudyrarelyutilisedthefullextentofthelearning.
HRD challenges facing New Zealand in the 21st century
Thegrouprecognisedthechangingdemographicmixintheglobalworkforceandreflectedhowthisaffectedissuessuchasfewerpeopleretiringearlyandlessyoungpeoplebecomingavailableforemployment.Astheaverageageoftheworkforceincreased,apolarityinvalueswaslikelytoemergebetweenthedifferentagegroupsintheworkplace:
Iwanttopickuponthisone…aboutthechangeofdemographics.Ithinkthatprobablythegreatestproblem
378 Tom Short and Roger Harris
wehaveinNewZealandisrecognisingtheageingworkforceandrealisingthatthosepeopleovertheageof50constitutealmostthemajorityofpeopleintheworkforce,andthat’sarealchallenge.Seeingtheneedsofanolderworker,andwhatdrivesthem,isverydifferentfromwhatyouaregettingina25yearold,andyetwehaven’tevencometogripswiththis.(Q10,TE)
EarlierinthispapertheHRMchallengesassociatedwithdistinctivedemographicgroups,suchasGenerationXemployeeswereraised.Membersofthefocusgroupreflectedontheirownpersonalexperiencesandsawthisasasignificantchallengeforhumanresourcepractitioners.Examplesincludedemergingvalues,suchasapproachestotime-keeping,debt,expectationsofworkingconditions,andattitudestoacademicsubjectssuchasmaths,sciencesandtechnology.Thedeclineintechnicalcompetence,atanelementarylevel,washarmfultotheNewZealandeconomy—asasmallislandnationthathadhistoricallyreliedonexport,manufacturingandagriculture.AnotherconcernwasthesizeofNewZealand’seconomy,itsgeographicisolationandthelackofabilitytosourcenewtechnology.Membersofthegroupcommentedthatuniversitieswereusingoutdatedequipmenttotrainstudents—puttingNewZealandlearnersatadisadvantagecomparedwiththosestudyinginoffshoretertiaryinstitutions.Emergingservice-basedindustries,suchastravelandtourism,seemedtobegrowing,butweregeneratinglowerpaidemploymentopportunities,andtherewasconcernoverhowmanyservice-sectorjobstheeconomycouldsustain.Thebankingsectorinparticularwascontinuallyseekingnewwaysofdoingbusiness,soinnovationwasthekeychallengeforthatindustryinthe21stcentury—despitethehugeprogressmadeinrecentyears.
Inrelationtogloballearning,theissueofconsistencycameupasamajorconcern—especiallyinthedeploymentofglobalHRDsolutionsinitiatedbyanoffshoreheadoffice.Thisfrequentlyledtoinitiativesbeingre-inventedtofitwiththeindigenouswayofdoingbusinessorviceversa.Themainchallengewasdevelopingglobalvaluesand
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 379
consistentpoliciesthatallowedtheincorporationoflocalculturesortraditionsintothesepolicies.Thegrouprecognisedhowincreasinglocalcomplianceissues(suchassafetyandlegislativereporting)oftenmadeanorganisationriskaverseandconsequentiallylesswillingtobecreative.InmanyNewZealandorganisationalsituations,thepressuretoperformdidnotcomefromoverseasmastersbutlocalgovernmentagenciesthathadaresponsibilitytoprotectthenationalinfrastructureandenvironment.
Factors affecting organisational success
TheparticipantsreflectedonHRDoutcomesthatwouldmostcontributetomakingtheirorganisationssuccessful.Akeyfactorthegroupstressedwastheimportanceofvaluingpeople,inparticularrecognisingwhatindividualscouldcontributeatalllevels.Theysuggestedemployeesshouldbeabletoarticulateanddefendthebusinessstrategyandknowwheretheycontributedtoit.Thestrategyneededtobeabalancebetweentheneedsoftheorganisationandthoseoftheindividualemployees.Theimportanceofbeingabletorelatepersonallytoavisionensuredthatpeopleremainedfocusedwhenthingsbecamedifficult.Asoneparticipantexpressedit,‘whenthingsstarttogettough,thevisiongivesyouamaptofollowandkeepsyouontrack’(Q12,MF).However,inadditiontounderstandingthevision,itwasimportanttohavetheabilitytobeflexiblewhenthesituationchanged:
Fromanemployeeperspective,theyarekeenonamorestablevisionandstrategybecauseitfeelsasthoughtheyknowwheretheyare—butitismakingsureyouarenotstuckwithasinglevisionandsinglestrategy.(Q12,CB)
Systemintegrationwasalsosignificant.Thisinvolvedconnectingtheneedsofindividualswiththeneedsoftheirorganisationsandembeddingtherelationshipwithsystemsandprocesses.Thegroupagreedthat‘visionwasnothingwithouttherealityofplanningandoperatingsystems’(Short2008a:237).Furthermore,theparticipants
380 Tom Short and Roger Harris
claimedpeoplewhoweregoodatdevelopingstrategyoftenneglectedtheimplementationissues.Inthisregard,aworthwhileHRDoutcomewouldbetoalignandsynthesisethedevelopmentofallleaders,bothstrategicandoperational.Thegroupre-emphasisedthatbeingaleaderandvisionarywasnotexclusivetoseniormanagersaspeopleatalllevelshadacapacityforstrategicthinking.Theyoftenhadasignificantcontributiontomake,reinforcingtheneedforfeedback.Finally,thediscussionrevertedtoapotentialpolaritybetweenlearninganddevelopmentactivitiesandhumanresources.Onreflection,thegroupthoughtsuchpolaritywasdetrimentaltothewholeareaofperformanceimprovement,duetothestrongneedforagenuinepartnershipbetweenallstakeholdersinthebusiness.
Conclusions
ThispaperhasreviewedhowHRDprofessionalsinarangeoforganisationalsettingsdealwiththechallengesofimplementingworkplacelearningprojects,andinparticular,attempttoalignlearningactivitieswithbusinessobjectives.Throughsynthesisofthesepractitioners’views,ithasbeenpossibletogaininsightintothemajorthrustoforganisationaldevelopmentissuesintheworkplaceandtheroleofHRDprofessionals.Analysisoftheseprofessionals’perspectivesoftheirhumanresourcepracticesandexperiencessupportsanumberofconclusionsregardingthesignificanceofworkplacelearninganddevelopment.
First,seniormanagerswerefoundtodevelopstrategicplansandcascadeinformationthroughtheirorganisationsbymeansofbriefingsystemsandothercommunicationmechanisms.Inmanycases,HRDprofessionalswereresponsiblefortheimplementationofthesecommunicationsystemsandhelpedtoadvocatethedownstreambenefitstoemployeesaspartofanoverallchangemanagementstrategy.
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 381
Second,theresearchsupportedfindingsfromaDelphisurveyofleadingHRDacademicsbyMcGuireandCseh(2006)whofoundthatworkplacelearning,employeedevelopmentandtraininganddevelopmentwerethemosthighlyrankedconstituentcomponentsofHRD,butinthisstudy,theneedforaperformance-basedculturewaspermeatingthroughmanagementdecisionsonworkplacelearninganddevelopmentandwasinextricablylinkedwiththeorganisationalperformancemanagementsystems.Takingacriticalperspective,Sambrook(2004:613)arguesthatthischaracteristicwillslowlychangeasthestudyofHRDmatures,when‘organisationswillneedtoconsiderotherdiscoursesincludingthePRroleofHRDinpromotingcorporatesocialresponsibilityanditsmorehumanisticrole’.Evidenceofthistrendcouldbeseenattheindividuallevel,wherepeopleweremotivatedtodeploytheircompetenciesinanethicalandfairway.Thatmeantworkingforvalue-driventeamsandorganisationsthatalignedtheirbehaviourswithsociallyappropriategoals.Onceagain,HRDprofessionalswereplacedcentre-stageintheimplementationofthesealignmentstrategies.
Third,thespecialleadershiproleofhumanresourcepractitionersandtheemergingcomplexitiesofthistaskwereevidentintheresponses.Throughouttheresearch,theatmospherereflectedamixofoccupationalpassionandpersonalcommitmenttothedevelopmentofpeople,yetthispassionwastemperedbyamoodoffrustrationwithintherole.Majorsourcesofanxietyforthemwereinconsistencyinseniormanagementcommitmentandcontinuingresourceconstraints.Clearly,bridgingthegapbetweenstrategicidealsandoperationalrealitywasamajorchallengefortheseHRDprofessionalsinmeetingthedemandsoftheirmodern,complexworkplaces.
Fourth,thefailuretoevaluatelearningeventsandshowpositivebusinessresultswasclearlylinkedtoanundervaluingoftraininganddevelopmentinvestmentamongseniormanagers.Historically,
382 Tom Short and Roger Harris
thisissueismostevidentinthewayHRDprojectsarecut-backwhenbusinessperformanceispoor.
Finally,mostoftheorganisationsembracedbytheseHRDprofessionalswerefailingtoexploittheopportunitiesthatcouldbeavailablethroughanimprovedandsystematicrecognitionoftheemployees’tacitknowledgeandskillswithjobrequirements.Intheirstudyofcrisismanagement,KhatriandNg(2000)highlightedthevalueoftacitlearningandhoworganisationscandrawonknowledgethathasaccumulatedfromyearsofexperience.
References
Anderson,V.(2009).‘Desperatelyseekingalignment:reflectionsofseniorlinemanagersandHRDexecutives’,Human Resource Development International,41(3):263–277.
Berger,P.L.&Luckman,T.(1967).The social construction of reality: A treatise in the sociology of knowledge,Harmondsworth,UK:Penguin.
Boxall,P.&Purcell,J.(2003).Strategy and human resource management,Basingstoke:PalgraveMacmillan.
Buckley,R.&Caple,J.(1990).The theory and practice of training,London:KoganPage.
CharteredInstituteofPersonnelandDevelopment(2008).‘Trainingspendup’,People Management,14:13.
Cunningham,I.&Hyman,J.(1999).‘Devolvinghumanresourceresponsibilitiestotheline:beginningorendforpersonnel?’,Personnel Review,28(1/2):9–27.
Elsey,B.(1997).Australian graduate human resource studies—the people factor in workplace change management,Adelaide:UniversityofSouthAustralia.
Fenwick,T.(2001).Experiential learning,Informationseriesno.385,ERICClearinghouseonAdult,CareerandVocationalEducation,Columbus,Ohio:OhioStateUniversity.
Field,L.(2004).‘Rethinking“organisational”learning’,inFoley,G.(ed.),Dimensions of adult learning: Adult education and training in a global era,CrowsNest,NSW:Allen&Unwin:201–218.
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 383
Guest,D.(1987).‘Humanresourcemanagementandperformance:Areviewandresearchagenda’,International Journal of Human Resource Management,8(3):263–276.
Hendry,C.(1995).Human resource management—A strategic approach to employment,Oxford:Butterworth-Heinemann.
Horwitz,F.(1999).‘Theemergenceofstrategictraininganddevelopment:Thecurrentstateofplay’,Journal of European Industrial Training,23(4/5):180–190.
Iles,P.,Preece,D.&Chuai,X.(2010).‘TalentmanagementasamanagementfashioninHRD:Towardsaresearchagenda’,Human Resource Development International,13(2):125–145.
Khatri,N.&Ng,H.A.(2000).‘Theroleofintuitioninstrategicdecisionmaking’,Human Relations,53:57–86.
Kirkpatrick,D.L.(1996).Evaluating training programs—the four levels,SanFrancisco:Berett-Koehler.
MacLeod,A.(2008).Generation Y: Unlocking the talent of young managers.London:CharteredManagementInstitute:1–11.
Manocha,R.(2006).‘HRisstillnotstrategicenough’,People Management,12:13.
McGuire,D.&Cseh,M.(2006).‘ThedevelopmentofthefieldofHRD:ADelphistudy’,Journal of European Industrial Training,30(8):653–667.
Mueller,F.(1996).‘Humanresourcesasstrategicassets:Anevolutionaryresource-basedtheory’,Journal of Management Studies, 33(6):757–785.
Pareek,U.&RaoT.V.(2008).‘Fromasaplingtoarainforest:ThesagaofthedevelopmentofHRDinIndia’,Human Resource Development International,11(5):555–564.
Purcell,J.(1989).‘Theimpactofcorporatestrategyonhumanresourcemanagement’inStorey,J.(ed.),New perspectives on human resource management,London:Routledge:67–91.
Rigg,C.&Trehan,K.(2008).‘Criticalreflectionintheworkplace:Isitjusttoodifficult?’,Journal of European Industrial Training,32(5):374–384.
Sambrook,S.(2004).‘A“critical”timeforHRD?’,Journal of European Industrial Training,28(8/9):611–624.
Sambrook,S.(2009).‘CriticalHRD:Aconceptanalysis’,Personnel Review,38(1):61–73.
Sambrook,S.(2010).‘ThebestofHRD:Fad,factorfactions’,Human Resource Development International,13(2):121–123.
384 Tom Short and Roger Harris
Short,T.W.(2008a).‘Strategicalignmentandlearninginhumanresourcedevelopment:Ahermeneuticexploration’,unpublishedPhDthesis,UniversityofSouthAustralia,Adelaide.
Short,T.W.(2008b).‘Aligninghumanresourcedevelopmentwithbusinessstrategy’,Proceedings of the11th Australian VET Research Association Conference,Adelaide,3–4April,http://www.avetra.org.au/annual_conference/papers.shtml
Short,T.W.(2009).‘TheplaceandshapeofHRDinaglobalisedandturbulentworkplace’,Proceedings of the10th International Conference on Human Resource Development Research and Practice across Europe,NewcastleuponTyne,10–12June.
Sloman,M.(2004).‘Evaluationandevolution’,People Management,9:50.
Storey,J.(1989).New perspectives on human resource management,London:Routledge.
Tarrant,D.(2009).‘Trainsofthought’,HR Monthly,May:28.
Thompson,J.L.(1995).Strategy in action,London:Chapman&Hall.
Tyson,S.(1995).Strategic prospects for HRM,London:CharteredInstituteofPersonnelandDevelopment.
Wang,J.,Hutchins,H.M.&Garavan,N.2009).‘Exploringtheroleofhumanresourcedevelopmentinorganizationalcrisismanagement’,Human Resource Development Review,8(22):22–53.
Appendix: Focus group questions
General
1. Whatdoyouthinkemployeesinorganisationsvalue?2. Whatfactorsmoststronglyinfluencethedecisionsontrainingand
development?
Strategy
3. Whatwouldyousayisstrategicallyimportantfororganisationsatthepresenttime?
4. Howdoesyourorganisationcommunicatestrategytoitsemployees?
Challenges in aligning workplace learning with business goals 385
Human resource development
5. WhatrolesdoHRDpractitionersfulfilinorganisations-howdotheyaddvalue?
6. Inwhatwaysdolearninganddevelopmentactivitiesspecificallyalignwithbusinessstrategy?
Learning
7. Howdoyouevaluatelearninginyourorganisationandusetheinformation?
8. Whatwouldyousayarethecurrentbarrierstolearninginorganisations?
9. Howcanorganisationsrecognisethebroader‘extra-mural’learningandcapturethe‘tacit’knowledgepeoplehave?
Closing questions
10.Whatdoyouthinkarethechallengesfacingorganisationswhenoperatingina21stCenturyNewZealand?
11.Towhatextentisthephenomenonof‘globalisation’affectingorganisations?
12.Ifyoucouldrecommendjustonethingtoanorganisationtohelpmakeitmoresuccessful,whatwoulditbe(inthecontextofthisstudy)?
About the authors
Dr Tom Short has been a research fellow with the Centre for Research in Education, Equity and Work (CREEW) since 2008. Prior to that his career has included work in the education and manufacturing sectors as an engineer, business manager, management consultant and human resources manager. His research interests are strategic human resource management and adult learning in relation to workplace development.
386 Tom Short and Roger Harris
Dr Roger Harris is a Professor in the School of Education and Director of the Centre for Research in Education, Equity and Work, University of South Australia. He has had extensive experience in VET teacher education and VET research, with a focus on national training reform. Recently, he was Director of the national research consortium, Supporting VET providers in building capability for the future. Current professional activities include the South Australian Training and Skills Commission; Program Leader in the CRC for Rail Innovation; the Academic Board of a private provider; and Visiting Research Fellow in the Institute for Adult Learning, Singapore, for three months.
Contact details
Centre for Research in Education, Equity and Work, University of South Australia, Mawson Lakes Boulevard, Mawson Lakes, SA 5095Tel: (08) 8302 5421Email: [email protected]
Tel: (08) 8302 6246Email: [email protected]