CHAPTER 2METHODOLOGYThischapter presentsthedescriptiveresearchuseintheprocedurestudy. Theresearch design and the respondents of the study as well as the data gathering procedure, theresearch instrument and the statistical of data will be discussed.Research Design In this study the researcher wants to aim the importance and the difference of twoindividual techniques in dealing of their profession using the two alternative ways of learning:design practice and learning principles. This research design used the descriptive method whichis the historicaland comparative to gather the data and also used to describe contemporaryevents. Thus, the researcher aims to know the difference and the effectivity between twoalternative ways of learning and to determine where the Architecture students of University ofindanao mostly developed.Research SubjectsThe respondents of this study were the students of the University of indanao from!ollege of Architecture and "ine Arts #ducation specially the Architecture students who wereenrolled for $chool %ear &'()*&'(+. The researchers randomly selected ,' students. The studywere conducted inside the University of indanao, atina !ampus. Research InstrumentThe researcher developed a structured questionnaire to the respondents, which wasconstructed based on the readings and findings of different literatures from books, internet, andalso from the researcher questions itself base on the respondent-s proficiency. Thequestionnaire has attached the description of the purpose and importance of the study coversthe topic of the learning between .esign practice and Architectural principles in the students ofArchitect in University of indanao.Thisfivepoint liker scaleusedtoratetheitemanalysisof therespondentsinthequestionnaire as level in time / motion study between manual drafting and Auto!A..RangeDescriti!nInterretati!n " # $%" Str!ng&' AgreeThis in(icates that b!thacti)it' ractice a&& the time%

$ # *%"AgreeThis in(icates that b!th acti)it' ractice in the maj!rit'cases% * # 2%" Rare&' This in(icates that b!th acti)it' ractice in a min!rit'cases%2 # +%" DisagreeThis in(icates that b!th acti)it' ractice in a ,re-uent&' .a'% + # /%"Str!ng&' DisagreeThis in(icates that b!th acti)it' ne)er been racticeData Gathering Pr!ce(ureThe researcher study included analysis of all the research and articles that supports thestudy of the learning between .esign practice and Architectural principles to provide informationon the variables under this study.The following were the steps undergone by the researchers in conducting the study:See0ingPermissi!nt!C!n(uct theStu('%Theresearchers providealetter ofpermission or endorsement letter and submitted tothe office of the dean of !ollege ofArchitecture in the University of indanao to conduct the study and survey.Upon the approval receive from the dean-s office the researchers personally immediateadministered the gathering instrument with the assistance of teachers in university of indanao.A(ministrati!n an( Retrie)a& !, the 1uesti!nnaire%The researchers personallydistributethequestionnairewerethoroughlygiventheinstruction. 0uestionsandclarificationwere entertained and after each respondent was done answering the questionnaire theresearchers immediately retrieved.Retrie)a& !, theInstrument%Thegathereddatathroughthequestionnairewerecollated, tallied, and was sub1ected to statistical analysis and carefully encode and presented.Statistica& !, DataThe responses of the participants through questionnaire were tested using the followingstatistical tools:Mean%Thiswasusedtodeterminethedifferenceandthelearningbetween.esignpracticeandArchitectural principlespreparingbytheArchitecturestudentsof Universityofindanao.Pers!n2r% This is a measure of relationship between the two alternative ways. This wasused to determine the significance of the learning between the .esign practice and Architecturalprinciplesthat e2erted by the students of Architecture.