chapter 11 9/30/2013 22:001geog 3250. what are research ethics? click image of stanley milgram below...
TRANSCRIPT
What are research ethics?
Click image of Stanley Milgram below and ponder the ethical issues of his study
9/30/2013 22:00 2Geog 3250
Milgram “obedience” experiment 1963
Respect for PersonsPeople are not objects“participants” as opposed
to “respondents”?Ends do not justify
questionable meansRespect individual dignity
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 4
Respect for PersonsInformed consentMust have the capacity
to give consentInformation sheet –
describing study
Under what circumstances might informed consent be impractical?
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 5
Concern for WelfareAll aspects of the well-being of a participant,
(and researcher)
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 6
Concern for WelfarePrivacy
Remain anonymousConfidentiality
Information kept secure and not shared with others
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 7
Anonymity Example
For sensitive questions in a face-to-face structured survey questionnaireFlip coin – “heads” = truthful; “tails”
= always “yes”At least 50% of answers are
(theoretically) “yes” – used to calculate ‘actual’ yes:no ratio
9/30/2013 22:00 8Geog 3250
Anonymity Random Response ExampleTake out a coinFlip the coinDon’t show anyone (this
part is important)Memorize the result
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 9
Don’t have a coin?random.org coin flip
Anonymity Random Response Example
Answer the following according to your coin flip at polleverywhere: Have you ever cheated on an exam at University?Phone # is: 37607
Yes = 399161 No = 399162
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 10
= truthful answer = answer “yes” even if the truth is “no”
heads tails
Do your coin flip first to know if you should be truthful – see above
Anonymity Example Cont’d – calculating “yes”sSince at least ½ of “yes” forced by coin flip (see poll responses here):% of “yes” in excess of 50% * 2e.g., if 80% yes, then 80%-50% = 30%
* 2 = 60%So when 80% respond “yes”, the true
value of yes’s is very close to 60% and therefore 40% no.
Why only “very close”? assumes tails and heads subsamples are
sufficiently large and unbiased
Practical problems with this approach?9/30/2013 22:00 11Geog 3250
Don’t have a coin?random.org coin flip
Right to PrivacyHumphreys Tearoom Trade 1970
“homosexual encounters in public places”
Watch queenFollow-up interviews with deception
using licence plates
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 12
Right to PrivacyWhat is not fair game for research on the
internet?
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 13
Privacy and ConfidentialityRight to withdraw at any time
Stated in letter of information/informed consent
Confidentiality Question:If somebody withdraws, what should happen to
the data gathered about them to the point they withdrew?
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 14
JusticeWhat might be some “benefits” of social
research?
If direct benefits – avoid exclusion!
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 16
JusticeCosts/harms to well-being
Loss of self-esteem, shameStressLoss of social position…
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 17
Ethics BoardsGroup of researchers
(professors)Required before funds
released for study
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 18
Justice and Ethics BoardsClick on the images below to learn
about follow-ups to Milgram…
9/30/2013 22:00 19Geog 3250
Prison guard “Cool Hand Luke” 1967
Stanford Prison Experiment 1971 – “Guard”Stanford Prison Experiment 1971 – Zimbardo No ethics boards
Warning: this video contains images of Abu Ghraib torture and prisoner abuse that appeared in the news media – they contain nudity and are potentially disturbing – 00:31-01:08
“The Experiment 2002 – Reicher and HaslamEthics board approved
Ethical version of “Milgram” Obedience Study?The “150 volt solution” – first protest
9/30/2013 22:00 20Geog 3250
Burger “obedience” experiment 2009
$#@% that
hurts!
Workout your “core”Tri-Council Core2 tutorial – click image (2 hrs)
All who will be doing field research for their term project must show their certificate of completion
9/30/2013 22:00 Geog 3250 21