chapter 17: persuasive speeches
DESCRIPTION
Chapter 17: Persuasive Speeches. Content. Defining Persuasive Speech Cornerstones of Persuasion Forms of Reasoning Toulmin Model Types of Credibility Organizing Persuasive Speech One-sided vs. Two-sided Presentations Guidelines for Effective Persuasive Speaking. Persuasive Speech. - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Chapter 17: Persuasive Speeches
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Content
• Defining Persuasive Speech
• Cornerstones of Persuasion
• Forms of Reasoning
• Toulmin Model
• Types of Credibility
• Organizing Persuasive Speech
• One-sided vs. Two-sided
Presentations
• Guidelines for Effective Persuasive
Speaking
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Persuasive Speech
• Aims to change others by
prompting them to think, feel,
believe or act differently.
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Characteristics of Persuasive Speech
1. Involves multiple communicators
2. Persuasion is not coercion or force
3. Persuasive impact usually is
gradual and incremental
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Cornerstones of Persuasion
• Forms of proof or reasons people are
persuaded
1. Ethos - perceived personal character
of speaker; credibility
2. Pathos - emotional reasons for
attitudes, beliefs or action
3. Logos - rational or logical proof
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Toulmin Model
• Toulmin explained that logical
reasoning consists of 3 components
1. Claims - assertions
2. Grounds - evidence/data that support
the claim
3. Warrant - explains the relevance of
the grounds to the claim; justification
of grounds
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Toulmin Model
• Qualifier - word/phrase that limits the
scope of the claim
• Rebuttal - anticipates and addresses
reservations that listeners are likely
to have about claims
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Credibility
• Speaker earns this by convincing
listeners that he/she has personal
integrity, is positively disposed
toward them, and can be trusted
1. Initial Credibility - before a
presentation begins
2. Derived Credibility - during the
speech
3. Terminal Credibility - end of
presentation
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Organizing Speeches for Persuasive Impact
• Motivated Sequence Pattern
1. Listener’s attention is drawn to the subject
2. Establishes need by showing that a real
and serious problem exists
3. Speaker recommends a solution
4. Visualization - imagine the results
5. Speakers to the action step - appeal for
concrete action
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
One-sided and Two-sided Presentations
1. Listener’s expectations
2. Listener’s attitudes
3. Listener’s knowledge
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Guidelines for Effective Persuasive Speeches
1. Create common ground with listeners
2. Adapt to listeners
3. Avoid fallacious reasoning
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Guidelines for Effective Persuasive Speeches
a) Ad Hominem Arguments - arguments
that go to the person instead of the
idea
b) Post Hoc, Ergopropter Hoc - “after
this, then this”
c) Bandwagon Appeal - argues that
because people believe/act in a
particular way, you should too
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Guidelines for Effective Persuasive Speeches
d) Slippery Slope - claims that once we
take the 1st step, more and more
steps inevitably will follow until some
unacceptable consequences results
e) Hasty Generalization - broad claim
based on too limited evidence
f) Red Herring Argument - speakers who
try to deflect listeners from relevant
issues
COM 114: Introduction to Speech CommunicationSpring 2007
Guidelines for Effective Persuasive Speeches
g) Either-Or Logic - implying that there
are only two options
h) Reliance on the Halo Effect - occurs
when we generalize a person’s
authority or expertise in a particular
area to other areas that are irrelevant
to the person’s experience and
knowledge