chapter 20 writing reports, preparing for and presenting cases in court
TRANSCRIPT
Chapter 20
Writing Reports, Preparing for and Presenting Cases in Court
Reports
A permanent written record of important factsthat can be used to:• Examine the past• Keep other officers informed• Continue investigations• Prepare court cases• Provide the court with relevant facts• Coordinate law enforcement activities• Plan for future law enforcement services• Evaluate officers’ performance
Effective Reporting
• Use paragraphs• Use the past tense• Use first person • Use active voice• Be objective• Be concise
• Be clear• Be grammatically and
mechanically correct • Write legible• Be reader-friendly
Cases Are Not Prosecuted If:
• The complaint is invalid• The prosecutor declines after reading the
case• The complainant refuses to prosecute• The offender dies• The offender is in prison or out of the
country and cannot be returned• No evidence or leads exist
Preparing A Case For Court
• Review and evaluate all evidence, positive and negative, and the chain of custody
• Review all reports on the case
• Prepare witnesses
• Write the final report
• Hold a pretrial conference with the prosecutor
The Final Report Contains
1. The complaint
2. The preliminary investigation report
3. All follow-up reports
4. Statements, admissions, and confessions
5. Laboratory Reports
6. Photographs, sketches, and drawings
7. A summary of all the negative evidence
Pretrial Conference
• Review all the evidence• Discuss the strengths and weaknesses of
the case• Discuss the probable line of questioning by
the prosecutor and the defense • Discuss complicated or detailed
information fully• Discuss any legal questions
Trial
Main Participants• Judge• Jury• Attorneys
– Prosecutor
– Defense Counsel
• Defendant• Witnesses
Sequence Of A Criminal Trial
1. Jury Selection2. Opening statements Presentation of the
prosecution’s case3. Presentation of the defense’s case4. Closing statements 5. Instructions to the jury6. Jury deliberation7. Reading of the Verdict8. Acquittal or passing of sentence
Examination of Witnesses
• Direct examination – the initial questioning of a witness or defendant by the lawyer who is using the person’s testimony to further his case.
• Cross-examination – questioning by the opposing side for the purpose of assessing the validity of the testimony.
Inadmissible Statements
• Opinions and conclusions (unless expert witness)
• Hearsay
• Privileged communication
• Statements about character and reputation, including the defendant’s criminal record
Effective Testimony
• Speak clearly, firmly, and with expression• Answer questions directly• Pause briefly before answering• Refer to your notes if you do not recall exact
details• Admit calmly when you do not know an answer• Admit any mistakes you made in testifying• Avoid police jargon, sarcasm, and humor• Tell the complete truth as you know it
Nonverbal Elements
• Dress
• Eye contact
• Posture
• Gestures
• Mannerisms
• Rate of speech
• Tone of voice
Excelling As A Witness
• Familiarize yourself extensively with the case
• Educate the prosecuting attorney
• Look professional
• Establish your credentials
• Keep the jury interested
• Force the defense attorney to prove his case
• Maintain your composure
Qualifying As An Expert Witness
• Present or prior employment in the specific field• Active membership in a professional group in the
field• Research work in the field• An educational degree directly related to the field• Direct experience with the subject if not
employed in the field• Papers, treatises or books published on the
subject or teaching experience in it
Cross-examinationThe defense attorney will:
• Be disarmingly friendly or intimidatingly rude• Attack your credibility and impartiality• Attack your investigative skill• Attempt to force contradictions or inconsistencies• Ask leading questions or deliberately misquote
you• Ask for a simple answer to a complex question• Use rapid-fire questioning• Use the silent treatment