chapter 3 quantifying greenhouse gas sources and sinks in ...chapter 3: quantifying greenhouse gas...
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Authors:StephenM.Ogle,ColoradoStateUniversity(LeadAuthor)PaulR.Adler,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceJayBreidt,ColoradoStateUniversityStephenDelGrosso,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceJustinDerner,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceAlanFranzluebbers,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceMarkLiebig,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceBruceLinquist,UniversityofCalifornia,DavisPhilRobertson,MichiganStateUniversityMicheleSchoeneberger,USDAForestServiceJohanSix,UniversityofCalifornia,Davis;SwissFederalInstituteofTechnology,ETH‐ZurichChrisvanKessel,UniversityofCalifornia,DavisRodVenterea,USDAAgriculturalResearchServiceTristramWest,PacificNorthwestNationalLaboratory
Contents:
3 QuantifyingGreenhouseGasSourcesandSinksinCroplandandGrazingLandSystems..... .........................................................................................................................................................................3‐4
3.1 Overview...........................................................................................................................................................3‐53.1.1 OverviewofManagementPracticesandResultingGHGEmissions...........3‐63.1.2 SystemBoundariesandTemporalScale..............................................................3‐103.1.3 SummaryofSelectedMethods/ModelsSourcesofData...............................3‐103.1.4 OrganizationofChapter/Roadmap........................................................................3‐11
3.2 CroplandManagement..............................................................................................................................3‐123.2.1 ManagementInfluencingGHGEmissionsinUplandSystems.....................3‐123.2.2 ManagementInfluencingGHGEmissionsinFloodedCroppingSystems........
...............................................................................................................................................3‐253.2.3 Land‐UseChangetoCropland..................................................................................3‐28
3.3 GrazingLandManagement......................................................................................................................3‐293.3.1 ManagementActivityInfluencingGHGEmissions...........................................3‐303.3.2 Land‐UseChangetoGrazingLands........................................................................3‐36
3.4 Agroforestry..................................................................................................................................................3‐373.4.1 CarbonStocks..................................................................................................................3‐393.4.2 NitrousOxide...................................................................................................................3‐413.4.3 Methane.............................................................................................................................3‐413.4.4 ManagementInteractions...........................................................................................3‐42
Chapter 3
Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
![Page 2: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-2
3.5 EstimationMethods...................................................................................................................................3‐423.5.1 BiomassCarbonStockChanges...............................................................................3‐433.5.2 LitterCarbonStockChanges.....................................................................................3‐493.5.3 SoilCarbonStockChanges.........................................................................................3‐493.5.4 SoilNitrousOxide..........................................................................................................3‐583.5.5 MethaneUptakebySoils.............................................................................................3‐743.5.6 MethaneandNitrousOxidefromFloodedRiceCultivation.........................3‐773.5.7 CO2fromLiming.............................................................................................................3‐833.5.8 Non‐CO2EmissionsfromBiomassBurning........................................................3‐863.5.9 CO2fromUreaFertilizerApplications...................................................................3‐90
3.6 SummaryofResearchGapsforCropandGrazingLandManagement..................................3‐92Appendix3‐A:SoilN2OModelingFrameworkSpecifications...............................................................3‐97
3‐A.1DescriptionofProcess‐BasedModels.....................................................................3‐993‐A.2EmpiricalScalarsforBaseEmissionRates.........................................................3‐1063‐A.3Practice‐BasedScalingFactors................................................................................3‐108
Appendix3‐B:GuidanceforCropsNotIncludedintheDAYCENTModel....................................3‐113Chapter3References..........................................................................................................................................3‐116
Ogle,S.M.,P.R.Adler,F.J.Breidt,S.DelGrosso,J.Derner,A.Franzluebbers,M.Liebig,B.Linquist,G.P.Robertson,M.Schoeneberger,J.Six,C.vanKessel,R.Venterea,T.West,2014.Chapter3:QuantifyingGreenhouseGasSourcesandSinksinCroplandandGrazingLandSystems.InQuantifyingGreenhouseGasFluxesinAgricultureandForestry:MethodsforEntity‐ScaleInventory.TechnicalBulletinNumber1939.OfficeoftheChiefEconomist,U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,Washington,DC.606pages.July2014.Eve,M.,D.Pape,M.Flugge,R.Steele,D.Man,M.Riley‐Gilbert,andS.Biggar,Eds.
USDAisanequalopportunityproviderandemployer.
![Page 3: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-3
Acronyms,ChemicalFormulae,andUnits
C CarbonCH4 MethaneCO2 CarbondioxideCO2‐eq CarbondioxideequivalentsCRP ConservationReserveProgramEPA U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyGHG GreenhousegasH2CO3 Carbonicacidha HectareIPCC IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChangeK PotassiumLRR LandResourceRegionm MeterMg MegagramsN NitrogenN2 NitrogengasN2O NitrousOxideNH4+ AmmoniumNO NitricoxideNO3‐ NitrateNOx Mono‐nitrousoxidesNRCS NaturalResourcesConservationServiceNUE NitrogenuseefficiencyO2 OxygenPg PetagramPRISM Parameter‐ElevationRegressionsonIndependentSlopesModelSOC SoilorganiccarbonSOM SoilorganicmatterSSURGO SoilSurveyGeographicDatabaseTg TeragramsUSDA U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture
![Page 4: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-4
Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.
![Page 5: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-5
3 QuantifyingGreenhouseGasSourcesandSinksinCroplandandGrazingLandSystems
Thischapterprovidesmethodologiesandguidanceforreportinggreenhousegas(GHG)emissionsandsinksattheentityscaleforcroplandandgrazinglandsystems.Morespecifically,itfocusesonmethodsforlandusedfortheproductionofcropsandlivestock(i.e.,grazinglands).Section3.1providesanoverviewofcroplandandgrazinglandsystemsmanagementpracticesandresultingGHGemissions,systemboundariesandtemporalscale,asummaryoftheselectedmethods/models,sourcesofdata,andaroadmapforthechapter.Section3.2presentsthevariousmanagementpracticesthatinfluenceGHGemissionsinuplandandwetlandcroppingsystemsandland‐usechangetocropland.Section3.3providesasimilardiscussionforgrazinglandsystemsandland‐usechangetograzingsystems.Section3.4discussesagroforestry,andSection3.5providestheestimationmethods.Finally,Section3.6includesasummaryofresearchgapswithadditionalinformationonthenitrousoxide(N2O)methodologyandsupplementalmethodologyguidanceintheAppendices.
3.1 Overview
Croplandandgrazinglandsystemsaremanagedinavarietyofways,whichresultsinvaryingdegreesofGHGemissionsorsinks.Table3‐1providesadescriptionofthesourcesofemissionsorsinksandthesectioninwhichmethodologiesareprovidedalongwiththecorrespondingGHGs.
Table3‐1:OverviewofCroplandandGrazingLandSystemsSourcesandAssociatedGreenhouseGases
SourceMethodforGHGEstimation Description
CO2 N2O CH4
Biomassandlittercarbonstockchanges
Estimating herbaceousbiomasscarbon stockduringchangesinlanduseisnecessarytoaccountfortheinfluenceofherbaceousplantsoncarbondioxide(CO2)uptakefromtheatmosphereandstorageintheterrestrialbiosphereforatleastaportionoftheyearrelativetothebiomasscarbonandassociatedCO2uptakeinthepreviouslandusesystem.Agroforestrysystemsalsohavealongertermgainorlossofcarbonbasedonthemanagementoftreesinthesesystems.
Soilorganiccarbonstocksformineralsoils
Soilorganiccarbon stocksareinfluencedbylanduseandmanagementincroplandandgrazinglandsystems,aswellasconversionfromotherlandusesintothesesystems(Aaldeetal.,2006).Soilorganiccarbonpoolscanbemodifiedduetochangesincarboninputsandoutputs(Paustianetal.,1997).
Soilorganiccarbonstocksfororganicsoils
Emissionsoccurinorganicsoilsfollowingdrainageduetotheconversionofananaerobicenvironmentwithahighwatertabletoaerobicconditions(ArmentanoandMenges,1986),resultinginasignificantlossofcarbontotheatmosphere(Ogleetal.,2003).
DirectandindirectN2Oemissionsfrommineralsoils
N2Oisemittedfromcroplandbothdirectlyandindirectly.Directemissionsarefluxesfromcroplandorgrazinglandswheretherearenitrogenadditionsornitrogenmineralizedfromsoilorganicmatter.Indirectemissionsoccurwhenreactivenitrogenisvolatilizedasammonia(NH3)ornitrogenoxide(NOx),ortransportedviasurfacerunofforleachinginsolubleformsfromcroplandorgrazinglands,leadingtoN2Oemissionsinanotherlocation.
![Page 6: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-6
SourceMethodforGHGEstimation Description
CO2 N2O CH4
DirectN2Oemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils
Organicsoils (i.e.,histosols) areaspecialcaseinwhichdrainageleadstohighratesofnitrogenmineralizationandincreasedN2Oemissions.Themethodassumesthatorganicsoilshaveasignificantorganichorizoninthesoil,andtherefore,themaininputsofnitrogenarefromoxidationoforganicmatter.
Methaneuptakebysoils
Agronomicactivityuniversallyreducesmethanotrophyinarablesoilsby70%ormore(Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000).Recoveryofmethane(CH4)oxidationuponabandonmentfromagricultureisslow,taking50to100yearsforthedevelopmentofeven50%offormer(original)rates(Levineetal.,2011).
MethaneandN2Oemissionsfromricecultivation
ThereareanumberofmanagementpracticesthataffectCH4 andN2Oemissionsfromricesystems.Themethodaddresseskeypracticesincludingtheinfluenceofwatermanagement,residuemanagementandorganicamendmentsonCH4emissionsfromrice(Lascoetal.,2006;Yanetal.,2005)andassociatedimpactsonN2Oemissions.
CO2fromliming
AdditionoflimetosoilsistypicallythoughttogenerateCO2emissionstotheatmosphere(deKleinetal.,2006).However,prevailingconditionsinU.S.agriculturallandsleadtoCO2uptakebecausethemajorityoflimeisdissolvedinthepresenceofcarbonicacid(H2CO3).Therefore,theadditionoflimewillleadtoacarbonsinkinthemajorityofU.S.croplandandgrazinglandsystems.
Non‐CO2emissionsfrombiomassburning
BiomassburningleadstoemissionsofCO2aswellasotherGHGsorprecursorstoGHGsthatareformedlaterthroughadditionalchemicalreactions.Note:CO2emissionsarenotaddressedforcropresiduesorgrasslandburning,becausethecarbonisre‐absorbedfromtheatmosphereinnewgrowthofcropsorgrasseswithinanannualcycle.
CO2fromureafertilizerapplication
UreafertilizerapplicationtosoilscontributesCO2emissions totheatmosphere.TheCO2emittedisincorporatedintotheureaduringthemanufacturingprocess.IntheUnitedStates,thesourceoftheCO2isfossilfuelusedforNH3production.TheCO2capturedduringNH3productionisincludedinthemanufacturer’sreportingsoitsreleaseviaureafertilizationisanadditionalCO2emissiontotheatmosphereandisincludedinthefarm‐scaleentityreporting.
3.1.1 OverviewofManagementPracticesandResultingGHGEmissions
GuidanceisprovidedinthissectionforreportingofGHGemissionsassociatedwithentity‐levelfluxesfromfarmand/orlivestockoperations.TheguidancefocusesonmethodsforestimatingtheinfluenceoflanduseandmanagementpracticesonGHGemissions(andsinks)incropandgrazinglandsystems.Methodsaredescribedforestimatingbiomassandsoilcarbonstockchanges,soilN2Oemissions,CH4emissionsfromfloodedrice,CH4sinksfrommethanotrophicactivity,CO2emissionsorsinksfromliming,biomassburningnon‐CO2GHGemissions,andCO2emissionsfromureafertilizerapplication(seeTable3‐2).
![Page 7: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-7
Table3‐2:OverviewofCroplandandGrazingLandSystemsSources,MethodandSection
Section Source Method
3.5.1‐3.5.2
Biomasscarbonstockchanges
HerbaceousbiomassisestimatedwithanIPCCTier2methodusingentityspecificdataasinputintotheIPCCequationsdevelopedbyLascoetal.(2006)andVerchotetal.(2006).WoodyplantgrowthandlossesinagroforestryorperennialtreecropsareestimatedwithanIPCCTier3method,usingasimulationmodelapproachwithentityinput.
3.5.3Soilorganiccarbonstocksformineralsoils
AnIPCCTier3methodisusedtoestimatetheSOCatthebeginningandendoftheyearformineralsoilswiththeDAYCENTprocess‐basedmodel.ThestocksareenteredintotheIPCCequationsdevelopedbyLascoetal.(2006),Verchotetal.(2006)toestimatecarbonstockchanges.
3.5.3Soilorganiccarbonstocksfororganicsoils
CO2emissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils(i.e.,Histosols)areestimatedwithanIPCCTier2methodusingtheIPCCequationdevelopedbyAaldeetal.(2006)andregionspecificemissionfactorsfromOgleetal.(2003).
3.5.4
DirectN2Oemissionsfrommineralsoils
ThedirectN2OmethodsareestimatedwithanIPCCTier3method.Formajorcommoditycrops,acombinationofexperimentaldataandprocess‐basedmodelingusingtheDAYCENT1modelandDNDC2(denitrification‐decomposition)areusedtoderiveexpectedbaseemissionratesfordifferentsoiltextureclassesineachU.S.DepartmentofAgricultureLandResourceRegion.Forminorcommoditycropsandincaseswherethereareinsufficientempiricaldatatoderiveabaseemissionrate,thebaseemissionrateisbasedontheIPCCdefaultfactormultipliedbythenitrogeninput(deKleinetal.,2006).Theseemissionratesarescaledwithpractice‐basedscalingfactorstoestimatetheinfluenceofmanagementchangessuchasapplicationofnitrificationinhibitorsorslow‐releasefertilizers.
DirectN2Oemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils
DirectN2Oemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils,i.e.,Histosols,areestimatedwiththeIPCCTier1method(deKleinetal.,2006).
IndirectN2Oemissions
IndirectsoilN2OemissionsareestimatedwiththeIPCCTier1method(deKleinetal.,2006).
3.5.5Methaneuptakebysoils
Methaneuptakebysoilisestimatedwithanequationthatusesaveragevaluesformethaneoxidationinnaturalvegetation—whethergrassland,coniferousforest,ordeciduousforest—attenuatedbycurrentlandusepractices.ThisapproachisanIPCCTier3method.
3.5.6
MethaneandN2Oemissionsfromfloodedricecultivation
IPCCTier1methodsareusedtoestimateCH4andN2Oemissionsfromfloodedriceproduction(deKleinetal.,2006;Lascoetal.,2006).
1TheversionofDAYCENTcodedandparameterizedforthemostrecentU.S.nationalGHGinventory(U.S.EPA,2013)wasusedtoderiveexpectedbaseemissionrates.2DNDC9.5compiledonFeb25,2013wasusedtoderiveexpectedbaseemissionrates.
![Page 8: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-8
Section Source Method
3.5.7 CO2fromlimingAnIPCCTier2methodisusedtoestimateCO2emissionsfromapplicationofcarbonatelimes(deKleinetal.,2006)withU.S.‐specificemissionsfactors(adaptedfromWestandMcBride,2005).
3.5.8Non‐CO2emissionsfrombiomassburning
Non‐CO2GHGemissionsfrombiomassburningofgrazinglandvegetationorcropresiduesareestimatedwiththeIPCCTier2method(Aaldeetal.,2006).
3.5.9CO2fromureafertilizerapplication
CO2emissionsfromapplicationofureaorurea‐basedfertilizerstosoilsareestimatedwiththeIPCCTier1method(deKleinetal.,2006).
3.1.1.1 DescriptionofSector
Croplandsincludeallsystemsusedtoproducefood,feed,andfibercommodities,inadditiontofeedstocksforbioenergyproduction.Croplandsareusedfortheproductionofadaptedcropsforharvestandincludebothcultivatedandnon‐cultivatedcrops(U.S.EPA,2013).Cultivatedcropsaretypicallycategorizedasroworclose‐growncrops,suchascorn,soybeans,andwheat.Non‐cultivatedcrops(orthoseoccasionallycultivatedtoreplenishthecrop)includehay,perennialcrops(e.g.,orchardsandvineyards),andhorticulturalcrops.ThemajorityofU.S.croplandisinuplandsystemsoutsideofwetlandsasdefinedinSection4.1.1,Wetlands,anduplandcroppingsystems(i.e.,dryland)mayormaynotbeirrigated.Ricecanbegrownonnaturalorconstructedwetlands,butwewillrefertothesesystemsasfloodedricetoavoidconfusionwithChapter4.Inaddition,wetlandscanalsobedrainedforcropproduction,whichagainisconsideredacroplandbecausetheprincipaluseiscropproduction.Somecroplandsaresetasideinreserve,suchaslandsenrolledintheConservationReserveProgram(CRP).Croplandsalsoincludeagroforestrysystemsthatareamixtureofcropsandtrees,suchasalleycropping,shelterbelts,andriparianbuffers.
Grazinglandsaresystemsthatareusedforlivestockproduction,andoccurprimarilyongrasslands.Grasslandsarecomposedprincipallyofgrasses,grass‐likeplants,forbs,orshrubssuitableforgrazingandbrowsing,andincludebothpasturesandnativerangelands(U.S.EPA,2013).Furthermore,savannas,somewetlandsanddeserts,andtundracanbeconsideredgrazinglandsintheUnitedStatesifusedforlivestockproduction.Grazinglandsystemsinclude:(1)managedpasturesthatmayrequireperiodicclearing,burning,chaining,and/orchemicalstomaintainthegrassvegetation;and(2)nativerangelandsthattypicallyrequirelimitedmanagementtomaintainbutmaybedegradedifoverstockedorotherwiseoverused.
CropandgrazinglandmanagementinfluencesGHGemissions(Smithetal.,2008b),whichcanbereducedbyadoptingconservationpractices(CAST,2004;2011).Operatorsofcroplandsystemsuseavarietyofpracticesthathaveimplicationsforemissions,suchasnutrientadditions,irrigation,limingapplications,tillagepractices,residuemanagement,fallowingfields,forageandcropselection,set‐asidesoflandsinreserveprograms,erosioncontrolpractices,watertablemanagementinwetlands,anddrainageofwetlands.OperatorsofgrazingsystemsalsohaveavarietyofmanagementoptionsthatinfluenceGHGemissions,suchasstockingrate,forageselection,useofprescribedfires,nutrientapplications,wetlanddrainage,irrigation,limingapplications,andsilvopastoralpractices.
3.1.1.2 ResultingGHGEmissions
CroplandandgrazinglandsaresourcesofN2OandCH4emissionsandhavealargepotentialtosequestercarbonwithchangesinmanagement(Smithetal.,2008b).Infact,N2Oemissionsfrom
![Page 9: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-9
managementofagriculturalsoilsareakeysourceofGHGemissionsintheUnitedStates(U.S.EPA,2013).N2Oemissionsresultfromtheprocessesofnitrificationanddenitrification,whichareinfluencedbylanduseandmanagementactivity.Landuseandmanagementcanalsoinfluencecarbonstocksinbiomass,deadbiomass,andsoilpools.Carbonstockscanbeenhancedorreduceddependingonlanduseandmanagementpractices(CAST,2004;IPCC,2000;Smithetal.,2008b).Consequently,cropandgrazinglandsystemscanbeeitherasourceorsinkforCO2,dependingonthenetchangesinbiomass,deadbiomass,andsoilcarbon.Burningbiomassisapracticethatcaninitiallyreducebiomasscarbonstockbutcanprovidesufficientstimulustoenhanceensuingecosystemcarbonstorage.Ingeneralthough,burningcausesadeclineinsoilorganiccarbonstocksduetolossofcarboninputfromplantlitterandroots.Burningwillalsoleadtonon‐CO2GHGemissions—CH4,N2O,andotheraerosolgases(CO,NOx)—thatcanbelaterconvertedtoGHGsintheatmosphereoroncedepositedontosoil.
SoilsincropandgrazinglandsystemscanalsobeasourceorsinkforCH4dependingontheconditionsandmanagementofsoil.CH4canberemovedfromtheatmospherethroughtheprocessofmethanotrophyinsoils.Methanotrophyoccursunderaerobicconditionsandiscommoninmostsoilsthatdonothavestandingwater.Incontrast,CH4isproducedinsoilsthroughtheprocessofmethanogenesis,whichoccursunderanaerobicconditions(e.g.,soilswithstandingwatersuchassoilsusedforfloodedriceproduction).Bothoftheseprocessesaredrivenbytheactivityofmicroorganismsinsoils,andtheirrateofactivityisinfluencedbylanduseandmanagement.
3.1.1.3 Managementinteractions
TheinfluenceofcropandgrazinglandmanagementonGHGemissionsisnottypicallythesimplesumofeachpractice’seffect.Theinfluenceofonepracticecandependonanotherpractice.Forexample,theinfluenceoftillageonsoilcarbonwilldependonresiduemanagement.Theinfluenceofnitrogenfertilizationratescandependontheapplicationofnitrificationinhibitors.AvarietyofexamplesisgiveninSection3.2andSection3.3.Becauseofthesesynergies,estimatingGHGemissionsfromcropandgrazinglandsystemswilldependonacompletedescriptionofthepracticesusedintheoperation,includingpastmanagementtocapturelegacyeffectsonGHGemissions,aswellasancillaryvariablessuchassoilcharacteristicsandweatherorclimateconditions.
3.1.1.4 RiskofReversals
AnytrendinGHGemissionsassociatedwithachangeincropandgrazinglandmanagementcanbereversediftheoperatorrevertstotheoriginalpractice.ReversalswillnotnegatetheGHGmitigationforCH4orN2Othatoccurredpriortothereversion.IfemissionsarereducedforCH4orN2O,theemissionreductionispermanentandcannotbechangedbysubsequentmanagementdecisions.
Reversalscanoccurwithcarbonsequestrationinbiomassandsoils.CO2canberemovedfromtheatmospherethroughcropandforageproductionandsequesteredinbiomassorsoilsfollowingtheadoptionofaconservationpractice,suchasno‐till(CAST,2004;USDA,2011).Ifcarbonisincreasinginthebiomassorsoils,thenthepracticeeffectivelyreducestheamountofCO2intheatmosphere.However,netCO2canbereturnedtotheatmosphereifthereisareversioninmanagementtothepreviouspracticethatcausesadeclineinthebiomassorsoilcarbonstocks.Forexample,enrollmentoflandintheCRPhasincreasedtheamountofcarboninsoils(i.e.,increaseinsoilcarbonstock),andthusmitigatesCO2emissionstotheatmosphereassociatedwithotheremissionssources,suchasfossilfuelcombustion(USDA,2011).However,tillingformerCRPlandswillleadtoadeclineinsoilcarbonstocks,therebyreversingthetrendforCO2uptakefromtheatmosphereandleadingtoCO2emissiontotheatmosphere.Ingeneral,GHGemissionsinvolving
![Page 10: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-10
carbonstocksinbiomass,deadbiomass,orsoilscanbeconsideredreversible,dependingonfuturemanagementdecisions.Consequently,reversalsinvolvingcarbonstocksnotonlyaffectfutureemissiontrends,butalsohaveconsequencesonpastmitigationeffortsbyreturningpreviouslysequesteredCO2totheatmosphere.
3.1.2 SystemBoundariesandTemporalScale
Systemboundariesaredefinedbythecoverage,extent,andresolutionoftheestimationmethods.ThecoverageofmethodsinthisguidancecanbeusedtoestimateGHGemissionsourcesthatoccuronfarmandranchoperations,includingemissionsassociatedwithbiomasscarbon,littercarbon,andsoilscarbonstockchanges;CH4andN2Ofluxesfromsoils;emissionsfromburningofbiomass;andCO2fluxesassociatedwithureafertilizationandadditionofcarbonatelimes.GHGemissionsalsooccurwithproductionofmanagementinputs,suchassyntheticfertilizersandpesticides,andtheprocessingoffood,feed,fiber,andbioenergyfeedstockproductsfollowingharvest;butmethodsarenotprovidedtoestimatetheseemissions.Moreover,emissionsfromenergyuse,includingthoseoccurringontheentity’soperation,arenotaddressedinthemethods.
Themethodsprovidedforcropandgrazinglandsystemshavearesolutionofanindividualparceloflandorfieldandincludethespatialextentofallfieldsintheentity’soperation.Fieldsareareasusedtoproduceasinglecroporrotationofcrops,ortoraiselivestock(i.e.,pasture,rangeland).Fieldsareoften,butnotalways,dividedbyfences.Emissionsareestimatedforeachindividualfieldthatisusedforcroplandandgrazinglandontheoperation,andthentheemissionsareaddedtogethertoestimatethetotalemissionsfromthecropandgrazinglandsystemsintheentity’soperation.Thetotalsarethencombinedwithemissionsfromforestandlivestocktodeterminetheoverallemissionsfromtheoperationbasedonthemethodsprovidedinthisguidance.EmissionsareestimatedonanannualbasisforasmanyyearsasneededforGHGemissionsreporting.
3.1.3 SummaryofSelectedMethods/ModelsSourcesofData
TheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange(IPCC)(IPCC,2006)hasdevelopedasystemofmethodologicaltiersrelatedtothecomplexityofdifferentapproachesforestimatingGHGemissions.Tier1representsthesimplestmethods,usingdefaultequationsandemissionfactorsprovidedintheIPCCguidance.Tier2usesdefaultmethods,butemissionfactorsthatarespecifictodifferentregions.Tier3usescountry‐specificestimationmethods,suchasaprocess‐basedmodel.ThemethodsprovidedinthisreportrangefromthesimpleTier1approachestothemostcomplexTier3approaches.Higher‐tiermethodsareexpectedtoreduceuncertaintiesintheemissionestimates,ifsufficientactivitydataandtestingareavailable.
Tier1methodsareusedforestimatingCO2emissionsfromureafertilization,CH4emissionsfromfloodedrice,indirectsoilN2Oemissions,anddirectsoilN2Oemissionsfromdrainedorganicsoils.Thesemethodsarethemostgeneralizedglobally,andlackabilitytocapturespecificconditionsatlocalsites,andconsequentlyhavemoreuncertaintyforestimatingemissionsfromanentity’soperation.SoilN2Oemissions,CO2emissionsorsinksfromliming,biomasscarbonstockchanges,soilcarbonstockchangesfordrainedorganicsoils,andbiomassburningnon‐CO2GHGemissionsallhaveelementsofTier2methods,butmayrelypartlyonemissionfactorsprovidedbytheIPCC(2006).ThesemethodsincorporatesomeinformationaboutconditionsspecifictoU.S.agriculturalsystemsandtheinfluenceonemissionrates,butagainlackspecificityforlocalsiteconditionsinmanycases.SoilcarbonstockchangesformineralsoilsareestimatedusingaTier3methodwithaprocess‐basedsimulationmodel(i.e.,DAYCENT).CH4sinksfrommethanotrophicactivityarealsoestimatedwithaTier3method,duetotheabsenceofIPCCguidanceforestimatinglanduseandmanagementeffectsonCH4uptakeinsoils.TheTier3methodassociatedwithsoilcarbonstockchangesinmineralsoilshasthegreatestpotentialforestimatingtheinfluenceoflocalconditionson
![Page 11: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-11
GHGemissions.Theapplicationhasageneralsetofparametersthathavebeencalibratedacrossanationalsetofexperiments.However,themodeldoesincorporatedriversassociatedwithlocalconditions,includingspecificmanagementpractices,soilcharacteristics,andweatherpatterns,providingestimatesofGHGemissionsthataremorespecifictotheentity’soperation.FutureresearchandrefinementsofthecroplandandgrazinglandmethodswilllikelyincorporatemoreTier3methodsinthefuture,andthusprovideamoreaccurateestimationofGHGemissionsforentityreporting.
Allmethodsincludearangeofdatasourcesfromvaryinglevelsofspecificityonoperation‐specificdatatonationaldatasets.Operation‐specificdatawillneedtobecollectedbytheentity,andgenerallyareactivitydatarelatedtothefarmandlivestockmanagementpractices(e.g.,tillagepractices,grazingpractices,fertilizerusage).Nationaldatasetsarerecommendedforancillarydatarequirementsthatareusedinmethods,suchasclimatedataandsoilcharacteristics.However,theentitydoeshavetheoptiontouseoperation‐specificdataforclimate(i.e.,weatherdata)andsoils.
3.1.4 OrganizationofChapter/Roadmap
Thecroplands/grazinglandsportionofthisreportisorganizedintofourprimarysections.Sections3.2and3.3provideadescriptionofmanagementimpactsonGHGemissionsincropandgrazinglandsystems.Section3.2isfurthersubdividedintosectionsfocusedonuplandagriculture,floodedmanagementforcropproduction,andtheinfluenceofland‐usechange.Section3.3issubdividedintoageneraldescriptionofmanagementpracticesandtheinfluenceofland‐usechange.ThefirsttwosectionsprovidethescientificbasisforhowmanagementpracticesinfluenceGHGemissions.Thesetwosectionsalsodiscussmanagementoptionsthatrequirefurtherstudy.Section3.4providesanoverviewofagroforestrysystems.AgeneraldescriptionofthevariousGHGemissionsandsinksthatresultfrommanagementpracticesandpotentialmanagementinteractionsisprovidedinthissection.
Section3.5describesthemethods.Eachmethodincludesageneraldescription(includingequationsandfactorsifappropriate),activitydatarequirements,ancillarydatarequirements,limitationsofthemethod,anduncertaintiesassociatedwiththeestimation.AsinglemethodisprovidedforeachoftheGHGemissionsources(andsinks),basedonthebestavailablemethodforapplicationinanoperationalsystemforentity‐scalereporting.Asinglemethodwasselectedtoensureconsistencyinemissionestimationbyallreportingentities.Moreadvancedapproachesmaybeadoptedinthefutureasthemethodsmature.
Section3.6providesasummaryofresearchgaps.Thegapshighlightkeyresearchareasthatrequirefurtherstudyforoneoftworeasons.ThefirstreasonisthatapracticelackssufficientevidenceoraclearimpactonGHGemissionsbasedonexistingresearch.Thisgapismostoftenrelatedtoalackofmechanisticunderstandingoftheprocessesinfluencedbythepractice.Thesepracticesmaybeincludedinfuturerevisionstothemethodsiffurtherstudyleadstoaconsensusthatthepracticehasanimpactonemissions.Thesecondreasonforidentifyingtheneedforfurtherstudyisthatthepracticeisincludedinestimationmethods,butthereisneedforfurtherresearchtoreduceuncertainty.Thissecondgapmayinvolvefurthermechanisticstudy,butcouldalsorequirefurthermethodsofdevelopmentorrefinement.
Finally,Appendix3‐AprovidesamorecomprehensivedescriptionofthesoilN2Omodelingframeworkspecifications.Thisappendixincludesadiscussionoftheprocess‐basedmodelsusedinthemethodology;theempiricalscalarsforthebaseemissionrates;andthepractice‐basedscalingfactors.Appendix3‐BprovidesalternativemethodologiesincaseswhereanentityismanagingcropsnotincludedintheDAYCENTmodel.
![Page 12: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-12
3.2 CroplandManagement
HowcroplandismanagedcanhaveasignificanteffectonGHGemissionsandremovals.ThissectionprovidesasummaryofthecurrentstateofthescienceanddescribeshowmanagementpracticesdriveGHGemissionsorsinksinuplandcroplandsystems.
3.2.1 ManagementInfluencingGHGEmissionsinUplandSystems
ThecroplandmanagementpracticespresentedbelowfocusprimarilyonmitigationpotentialforsoilN2O,CH4emissions,andcarbonsequestration.EachsubsectiondescribesthepracticeandtheunderlyingGHGphenomenonthatinfluencemitigationpotential.
3.2.1.1 NutrientManagement(ManufacturedandOrganic)
Nutrientmanagementreferstotheadditionandmanagementofsyntheticandorganicfertilizerstocroplandsoils,primarilytoaugmentthesupplyofnutrientstothecrop.Nitrogenisgenerallythemostimportantnutrientfromanagronomicstandpoint,becauseitisusuallytheprimarynutrientlimitingcropyieldsandoftenmustbeaddedmorefrequentlyandingreateramountsthanothernutrientssuchasphosphorusandpotassium(ERS,2011;RobertsonandVitousek,2009).NitrogenisalsotheprimarynutrientofconcernwithregardtoGHGemissions,becauseoncefertilizernitrogenentersthesoilitcanbedirectlyconvertedtoN2Obysoilbiologicalprocessesand,insomecases,chemicalreactions(FirestoneandDavidson,1989;Kooletal.,2011;Venterea,2007).WhilerelativelylittleofthefertilizernitrogenappliedisconvertedtoN2O,theseemissionsaregenerallyalargecomponentofthetotalGHGbudgetofcroplands(e.g.,Mosieretal.,2005;Robertsonetal.,2000)becauseN2Ohas310timestheglobalwarmingpotentialofCO2(IPCC,2007).Otherformsofnitrogenoriginatingfromfertilizersmayalsobelosttotheenvironment,includingNH3,nitricoxide(NO),andnitrate(NO3‐).Oncetransportedtodownwindordownstreamecosystems,theseothernitrogenspeciescanbeconvertedtoN2O;suchemissionsarereferredtoas“indirect”N2Oemissions(Beaulieuetal.,2011;deKleinetal.,2006).
NutrientmanagementcanalsoaffectGHGemissionsotherthanN2O,mostnotablythesequestrationofcarbonuponmanureadditionandcropresidueretentionoraddition.Theadditionoforganiccarbonamendments,suchasmanureorresidues,canincreasesoilcarbonwithintheboundariesofthelandparcelreceivingtheamendment(Ogleetal.,2005).However,soilcarbonlossesmayoccurfromthesourcefield(Schlesinger,2000)dependingonthemanagement(Izaurraldeetal.,2001).Manufacturednitrogenadditionscanalsoleadtocarbonsequestration(Ladhaetal.,2011)whereadditionsleadtoincreasedresiduereturntosoil.
Fertilizerrate,timing,placement,andformulationstronglyaffectN2Ofluxes.Ingeneral,anypracticethatincreasescropnitrogenuseefficiency(NUE)wouldbeexpectedtoreduceN2Oemissions,becauseappliednitrogenthatistakenupbycropsorcovercropsisnotavailabletothesoilprocessesthatgenerateN2O,atleastintheshortterm;thisalsomaypreventnitrogenleaching.Thus,strategiestoreduceN2OemissionscanalsoreducethelossofNO3‐andotherformsofreactivenitrogenfromcroppingsystems.
However,practicesthatimproveNUEwillnotalwaysreduceN2Oemissions.Differentfertilizerformulations,forexample,canresultindifferentN2OemissionsirrespectiveofNUEeffects(e.g.,GagnonandZiadi,2010;Gagnonetal.,2011).Likewise,bandedfertilizerplacementcanincreaseNUE(e.g.,Yadvinder‐Singhetal.,1994)butalsocanincreaseratherthandecreaseN2Oemissions(e.g.,Engeletal.,2010),andtillagemanagementcanalsoincreaseNUEwithoutreducingN2Oemissions(Grandyetal.,2006).Thus,NUEisgenerallyimportantbutnotbyitselfsufficienttopredictormanageN2Oemissions.Fertilizerrate,timing,placement,andformulationcanaffectNUEandN2Oemissionsindependently.
![Page 13: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-13
FertilizerRate:Morethananyotherfactor,theamountofnitrogenfertilizerappliedtosoilaffectstheamountofN2Oemitted;inmanycasesothernitrogen‐usestrategies(timing,placement,andformulation)providetheirbenefitbyeffectivelyreducingfertilizernitrogenavailableinthesoil.Inthissense,fertilizerrateintegratestheeffectsofmultiplepracticesandisthebasisfortheIPCCTier1N2Oaccountingmethod(deKleinetal.,2006),wherebyN2Oemissionsareassumedtobeasimplefractionofnitrogeninputs.
Irrespectiveofotherpractices,however,fertilizerrateitselfcanberefinedtoreduceN2Oemissionssolongasratesarenotreducedtothepointthatyieldsdecline.Otherwisemarketleakage—theneedtomakeupyieldselsewherewithmoreintensivefertilizeruseandconcomitantN2Oloss—maylimitthebenefitofreducinglocalfertilizerrates.Thequestionthenbecomeswhethernitrogenfertilizerratescanbereducedwithoutreducingyieldsinaparticularfield.Atleastforcorn,recentchangesinrecommendedfertilizerratesformanyMidwestStatessuggestthatthereislatitudeforreducingfertilizernitrogenratesforsomefarmers.Sincethe1970s,mostfertilizernitrogenrecommendationshavebeenbasedonyieldgoals,whichuseexpectedmaximumyieldmultipliedbynitrogenyieldfactorstocalculatefertilizerrecommendations(Stanford,1973).Precedinglegumecrops,manureinputs,andsoilnitrogentestsarethenusedtofurtherrefineorreducerecommendednitrogenapplicationrates(AndraskiandBundy,2002).
Analternativetotheyield‐goalapproachistheMaximumReturntoNitrogenapproach(Sawyeretal.,2006),wherebytherateofnitrogenfertilizerappliedisbasedonthemaximumfertilizerratethatgeneratessufficientadditionalyieldtojustifythefertilizercost.Theratesaredeterminedfromcropnitrogenresponsecurves.Typically(butnotalways)thisrateissignificantlylessthanthatrecommendedbytheyieldgoalapproach.MaximumReturntoNitrogencalculatorsforcornhavebeenadoptedinatleastsevenStatesintheMidwest.Thiscalculatorandsimilardecisionsupporttoolshavethepotentialforreducingtheamountoffertilizernitrogenappliedtocropsandmorepreciselymatchcropnitrogenrequirements,withoutaffectingthenetreturns(Archeretal.,2008),andwithconcomitantdecreasesinN2Oemissions(Millaretal.,2010).
Hundredsoffertilizeradditionexperimentsworldwidehaveshownthattypically0.5to3percentofnitrogenaddedtosoilisemittedasN2O(Bouwmanetal.,2002;Linquistetal.,2011;StehfestandBouwman,2006).Site‐to‐sitevariationiswellrecognizedandistobeexpectedbasedonsoils,climate,andfertilizerpractices—includingrate.Recentevidencesuggeststhatemissionratesmaybeevenhigheratnitrogeninputlevelsthatexceedcropdemand(Hobenetal.,2011;Maetal.,2010;McSwineyandRobertson,2005;VanGroenigenetal.,2010).
FertilizerTiming:Amajorchallengeinmanagingnitrogenfertilizerforcropproductionissynchronizingnitrogenavailabilityinthesoilwiththecrop’sdemandfornitrogen.Ingeneral,cropdemandfornitrogenisminimalearlyinthegrowingseasonandincreasesseveralweeksafterplanting.
Inmanycases,itmaybemostconvenientand/orcost‐effectivefortheproducertoapplynitrogenfertilizerpriortoplantingorsoonafterplantemergence.InmanypartsoftheU.S.CornBelt,however,applicationofnitrogenfertilizercommonlyoccursinthefallpriortothegrowingseason(Biermanetal.,2011;Ribaudoetal.,2011).Intheabsenceofanactiveandwell‐developedrootsystemtoutilizethefertilizernitrogen,thesepracticesincreasethepotentialforsoilmicrobialandchemicalprocessestotransformtheappliednitrogenintoN2OandothermobileformssuchasNO3,whichcancontributetoindirectN2Oemissions.
Improvingthesynchronybetweensoilnitrogenavailabilityandcropnitrogendemandcanbeachievedbyswitchingfromfalltospringnitrogenapplication;applyingnitrogenseveralweeksafterplantingwith“sidedress”fertilizerapplicationsthataretimedtocoincidewithplantgrowthstages;andusingmultiple“split”applicationsdistributedintimeoverthegrowingseason.Eachof
![Page 14: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-14
thesestrategieshasthepotentialtoreduceN2Oemissions,butthisisnotalwaysthecase.Switchingfromfalltospringnitrogenfertilizer,forexample,hasbeenshowntoreduceN2Oemissionsinsomecases(Burtonetal.,2008a;Haoetal.,2001)butnotalways(Burtonetal.,2008a).Similarly,switchingfrompre‐planttopost‐plantapplicationshasbeenshowntoreduceN2Oemissionsinsomestudies(Matsonetal.,1998),butonlypartofthetimeornotatallinotherstudies(Burtonetal.,2008b;Phillipsetal.,2009;Zebarthetal.,2008b).Somestudieshavefoundreducednitrateleaching,whichimpliesreducedindirectN2Oemissions,withfertilizerapplicationlaterintheseason(e.g.,Errebhietal.,1998).
FertilizerPlacement:ThemannerinwhichnitrogenfertilizerisappliedtosoilcanaffectitsavailabilityforcropuptakeandthereforeitssusceptibilitytosoiltransformationandN2Oproduction.ThreeaspectsoffertilizerplacementaresignificanttoN2Oemissions:(1)broadcastapplicationversusbandingwithinthecroprow;(2)thesoildepthtowhichnitrogenisapplied;and(3)addingfertilizeruniformlyacrossafieldversusapplyingataspatiallyvariablerate.
ThereissomeevidencethatapplyingnitrogenfertilizerinnarrowbandscanimprovecropNUE(MalhiandNyborg,1985).However,bandingalsocreateszonesofhighlyconcentratedsoilnitrogen,whichcanincreaseN2Oproductioncomparedwithbroadcastapplications(Engeletal.,2010).OtherstudieshavefoundnodifferencesinN2Oemissionsinbroadcastversusbandedapplications(Burtonetal.,2008a;Sehyetal.,2003).DirectcomparisonsofapplicationdeptheffectsonN2Oemissionshavealsoshowninconsistentresults(e.g.,BreitenbeckandBremner,1986b;Druryetal.,2006;Fujinumaetal.,2011;Hosenetal.,2002;Liuetal.,2006).However,variablerateapplicationusesdifferentnitrogenratesfordifferentareasoffield,basedonexpectedvariationsincropnitrogendemand.Thisisanewtechniquethatappearspromisingbasedonitsabilitytosubstantiallyimprovefertilizeruseefficiencyatthefieldscale(Mamoetal.,2003;Scharfetal.,2005),andatleastoneearlystudyhasshownreducedN2Oemissionswhennitrogenratewasvariedtomatchcropyieldpotential(Sehyetal.,2003).
FertilizerFormulationandAdditives:ThemostcommonlyusedformsofsyntheticnitrogenfertilizerintheUnitedStatesincludeanhydrousammonia(35percentoftotaluse),urea(24percent),andliquidsolutions,includingureaammoniumnitrate(29percent)(ERS,2011).AvailableevidencesuggeststhatN2Oemissionsfollowingapplicationsofanhydrousammoniaaregreaterthanemissionsfollowingbroadcasturea,althoughinsomestudiesthismaybepartlyduetofertilizerplacement.Infivestudies,anhydrousammoniaresultedin40to200percentgreaterN2Oemissionscomparedwithbroadcasturea(BreitenbeckandBremner,1986a;Fujinumaetal.,2011;Thorntonetal.,1996;Ventereaetal.,2005).Onestudy(Burtonetal.,2008a)foundnodifferenceinN2Oemissionsbetweenanhydrousammoniaandbroadcastureawhenbothwereappliedatalowerrate(80kgNha‐1year‐1)comparedwiththeotherstudies(≥120kgNha‐1).Consequently,theremaybeathresholdintheapplicationratebeforethereisasignificanteffectonemissions.
Thechemicalformofnitrogenfertilizerinfluenceslossesofnitrogenfromthreemajorpathways:surfacevolatilization,soilmicrobialprocesses,andNO3‐leaching.Allfertilizersaresusceptibletodenitrificationoncenitrifiedto(orappliedas)NO3‐.Ammonium‐basedfertilizers,includinganhydrousammonia,urea,andorganicsourcessuchasmanure,arealsosusceptibletoN2Olossduringnitrification.Urea,anhydrousammonia,andmanureareadditionallysusceptibletosurfacevolatilizationasNH3undersomeconditions.VolatilizedNH3andleachedNO3‐contributetoindirectN2Oloss.
Chemicaladditiveshavebeendevelopedtoreleasefertilizernitrogenintothesoilmoregraduallyandtodelaythenitrificationofnitrogenfromammonium(NH4+)toNO3‐inordertoimprovethesynchronybetweencropnitrogendemandandsoilnitrogenavailability.Polymer‐coatedureaslowlyreleasesnitrogenwithincreasingsoiltemperatureandwater,andisintendedtomake
![Page 15: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-15
nitrogensupplymoresynchronouswithplantnitrogendemandandreducenitrogenlosses.EffectsonN2Oproduction,however,appearmixed,withsomestudiesshowingreducedN2Oforpolymer‐coatedurea(e.g.,Hyattetal.,2010)andothersshowingnoimpactorevenhigheremissions(Ventereaetal.,2011a).Arecentmeta‐analysisof13studiesofmostlyvolcanicandwetland‐derivedsoilsfoundthatpolymer‐coatedureareducedN2Oemissionsby35percentonaveragecomparedwithconventionalfertilizers,butresultsaredifficulttogeneralizebecausemostofthesoilsincludedintheanalysiswerenottypicalforU.S.croppingsystems(Akiyamaetal.,2010).
Fertilizersformulatedwithnitrificationinhibitorscanpotentiallyreduceemissionsfromnitrificationanddenitrification,aswellasNO3‐leaching.SomeU.S.fieldstudiesshowsubstantialreductionsinN2Oemissionswhenfertilizerswithnitrificationinhibitorsareaddedcomparedwithconventionalfertilizers(e.g.,Halvorsonetal.,2010a),whileothersshowlittleornoimpact(e.g.,ParkinandHatfield,2010a).Ameta‐analysisofsome28studiesworldwidereportedanaveragereductionof38percent(Akiyamaetal.,2010),butagainresultsaredifficulttogeneralizeduetothesmallsamplesizeandsoilsthatarenottypicalofU.S.croppingsystems.
Onereasontheimpactsoffertilizersdesignedtoreduceemissionsareinconsistentisthattheformofnitrogenappliedinteractswithotherfactorstocontrolnitrogenlosses.Amongthesefactorsisweather,whichdirectlyaffectstheprocessesthatleadtogaseousnitrogenlossesandNO3‐leaching,andindirectlyaffectstheseprocessesbycontrollingplantnitrogenuptake.Soilpropertiessuchastextureandhydraulicstatusarealsoimportant.Ingeneral,nitrificationisimportantinwell‐aeratedsoils,whiledenitrificationismoreimportantinpoorlydrainedsoils.Thenitrogensourcealsointeractswithothermanagementpractices.Forexample,polymer‐coatedureasubstantiallyreducedN2Oemissionsunderno‐tillbutnotfulltillcultivationforirrigatedcorninColorado(Halvorsonetal.,2010a).
OrganicFertilizerEffectsonN2OEmissions:LandapplicationofanimalmanurehasbeenrelatedtoN2Oemissions.Mosieretal.(1998)andPetersen(1999)measuredincreasesinN2Oemissionswithmanureapplication.KaiserandRuser(2000)measuredannualemissionsoftheaddednitrogeninslurryrangingfrom0.74to2.86percent,andDeKleinetal.(2001)foundthatannualN2O‐Nlossesrangedfromzerotofivepercentoftheorganicnitrogenappliedtosoils.Others(e.g.,BartonandSchipper,2001)foundN2OemissionsfollowingtheadditionofmanureslurriesexceededemissionsfromanequivalentamountofmanufacturedN,likelyduetotheslurry’screatingenhancedconditionsfordenitrification.However,GHGemissionsalsooccurifmanureismanagedinpits,lagoons,orsolidstorage.
Injectionofmanureisacommonpracticetoavoidsurfacerunoffandreduceobjectionableodorsfrommanureapplication.BothFlessaandBesse(2000)andWulfetal.(2002)suggestedthatinjectionofswinemanurewouldcreatemorefavorableconditionsforN2OandCH4formationbecauseofthereducedaerationwithinthesoil.However,Dendoovenetal.(1998)didnotfinddifferencesineitherN2OorCH4emissionsfrominjectedorsurface‐appliedswineslurryontoaloamysoil.Thesefindingssuggestthattherate,timing,placement,andformulationofmanureisimportanttoN2Oproduction,similartomanufacturednitrogenfertilizer,butthereisaneedforadditionalresearch.
CO2EmissionsGeneratedfromUreaFertilizerApplications:Unlikeothernitrogenfertilizers,urearesultsinthedirectproductionofCO2inadditiontowhateverN2Omightbesubsequentlyproducedbymicrobes(deKleinetal.,2006).Sinceureais20percentC,everymetrictonofureaappliedtosoilresultsinthedirectemissionof20kgCO2‐C;alternatively,everykilogramofnitrogenappliedasurearesultsinthedirectemissionsof0.43kgCO2‐C.UreaismanufacturedbyreactingNH3andCO2toformammoniumcarbamate,whichisthendehydratedtoformureaprills.IntheUnited
![Page 16: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-16
StatestheCO2inureaiscapturedfromthefossilfuelusedtomanufactureNH3,sothesoilCO2producedrepresentsafossilfuelemission.
ManagementSystemInteractions:NitrogenmanagementpracticescaninteractwithothercroplandmanagementcomponentsinregulatingGHGemissions.Asemphasizedabove,anyfactorthataffectscropNUEhasthepotentialtoaffectN2Oemissions.Therefore,optimizingotherpractices—includingtillageandthemanagementofsoilpH,pests,irrigation,drainage,andotherfactors—willtendtoincreasenitrogenfertilizeruptakebythecropandthereforereduceN2Oemissions.Forthisreason,nutrientmanagementeffectsonGHGemissionsshouldbeconsideredinthecontextoftheentiresetofcroplandmanagementpractices.Forexample,thereisevidencethatfertilizerplacementcaninteractwithtillagemanagementincontrollingN2Oemissions(Ventereaetal.,2005),andthatinadequatemanagementofothernutrients(e.g.,phosphorusandpotassium)canreduceNUE(Snyderetal.,2009).EffortstominimizeorremediatewaterqualityimpactsofnitratetransportfromfarmtoaquaticsystemsmayalsoreduceindirectN2Oemissions.Forexample,theuseofsubsurfacebioreactorstoremovenitratefromdrainagewaterhasbeneficialimpactsonindirectN2O.However,todatethesebioreactorshavenotbeenimplementedatlarge(field)scalesandtherearealsoquestionsaboutreleaseofN2OandCH4duringthetreatmentprocessthatneedtobeansweredbeforetheirneteffectonGHGscanbeassessed(Elgoodetal.,2010).Also,environmentalandclimatefactors,whicharegenerallynotundermanagementcontrol,mayaffectN2Oemissions;forexample,nitrogenfertilizerappliedjustbeforelargerainfalleventscanstimulateincreasedemissions(Lietal.,1992).
3.2.1.2 TillagePractices
Differenttillagepracticesaregenerallyclassifiedintooneofthreecategories:fulltillage,reducedtillage,ornotillage.Tillageintensityisbasedonimplements,numberofpasses,andthepercentageofsurfaceanddepthoftillagedisturbance.Toolsareavailabletodeterminetillageintensity(e.g.,theSTIRModel;seeUSDANRCS,2008).No‐tillagepracticesarecharacterizedbytheuseofseeddrillsandfertilizerorpesticideapplicatorswithnoadditionaltillageeventsorimplements.Surfaceresiduesarenotincorporatedintothesoilwhenfollowingno‐tillagepractices,andthereislimiteddisturbancetothesoilprofile;consequentlyno‐tillagemanagementincreasessoilcoverandimprovesaggregatestability(Sixetal.,2000).Incontrast,examplesoffulltillage(oftenreferredtoasconventionaltillage)includeoneormorepasseswiththefollowingtillageimplements:moldboardplow,diskplow,diskchisel,twistedpointchiselplow,heavydutyoffsetdisk,subsoilchiselplow,andbedderordiskripper.Systemsarealsoclassifiedasfulltillageiftherearetwoormorepasseswithoneofthefollowingimplements:chiselplow,singledisk,tandemdisk,offsetdisk‐lightduty,one‐waydisk,heavy‐dutycultivator,ridgetill,orrototiller.Systemswithothertillagepractices,suchasasinglepasswitharidgetillimplement,mulchtill,orchiselplow,leadtointermediatedisturbanceofthesoilandareclassifiedasreducedtillage.
Changesintillagepracticescaninfluenceverticaldistributionofcarboninthesoilprofileandtotalsoilcarbonstocks(Paustianetal.,1997).Historically,fulltillagehasresultedinthereductionofsoilcarbonstocks(Laletal.,2004).Asynthesisofpreviousanalysesestimatedthatlong‐termfulltillagecandecreasesoilcarbonstocksby30percent(Ogleetal.,2005;Westetal.,2004).ChangingfromfulltillagetonotillagecanreversehistoriclossesofsoilC.No‐tillagepracticescanleadtoaccumulationofsoilcarbonintheuppersoilprofile(0to30cm),withlittletonochangeinthelowersoilprofile(30to60cm)(Syswerdaetal.,2011).Theopposite,adecreaseintheuppersoilhorizonwithanincreaseinthelowersoilhorizon,cansometimesoccurwithachangefromnotillagetofulltillage(Bakeretal.,2007).However,changesinthelowersoilprofiletendtobemorevariable,therebyrequiringalargersamplesizetodetectsignificantdifferences(KravchenkoandRobertson,2011).Areductionincarboninputassociatedwiththeinfluenceofno‐tillmanagementoncropproductionmayalsoleadtolossesofsoilcarbon,particularlyincoolerandwetterclimates
![Page 17: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-17
(Ogleetal.,2012).However,whiledifferencesintheresponseofsoilcarbonstockstotillageoccuramongfieldexperiments,comprehensiveanalysesofavailablefielddataindicatethat,onaverage,soilcarbonstocksincreasewithachangefromfulltillagetoreducedtillageornotillage,especiallywithlong‐termadoptionofnotillage(Ogleetal.,2005;Sixetal.,2004;WestandMarland,2002).
Decreasedtillageintensityincreasessoilcarbonbecauseofreduceddisturbancetosoilaggregates,reducedexposureofsoilorganicmattertoweatheringprocesses,anddecreaseddecompositionrates(Paustianetal.,2000).Theextenttowhichsoilcarbonaccumulationoccursafterareductionintillageintensityisdeterminedbythehistoryoflandmanagement,soilattributes,regionalclimate,andcurrentcarbonstocks(WestandSix,2007).Ingeneral,greatersoilcarbonaccumulationwillbeobservedinC‐poorsoils(i.e.,duetolong‐termcultivation)withaclayeytextureunderhighbiomasscroppingsystemsintemperatehumidandwarmclimates(FranzluebbersandSteiner,2002;Planteetal.,2006;Sixetal.,2004).Insomecases,intermittenttillage,duringlong‐termreducedornotillage,isneededtoreducesoilcompaction,forweedcontrol,ortoreducepestsorpathogens.Whileintermittenttillagecancauseadecreaseinsoilstocks,upto80percentofsoilgainsfromno‐tillagepracticescanbemaintainedwhenimplementingnotillagewithintermittenttillage(Conantetal.,2007;Ventereaetal.,2006).
TheeffectoftillagemanagementchangesonsoilN2Oemissionsisvariableandnotfullyunderstood.Increases(Rochette,2008),decreases(Mosieretal.,2006),andnochanges(Grandyetal.,2006;Lemkeetal.,1998)insoilN2Oemissionshavebeenobserved.However,thosedifferencesarenottotallyrandomandpastmeta‐analyseshaveconcludedthatclimateregime,durationofpractice,andnitrogenfertilizerplacementhaveinfluencedtillageeffectsonN2Oemissions(Sixetal.,2004;vanKesseletal.,2012).Othervariablessuchassoiltexturemayalsobeimportant.
RegionalclimatehasalsobeenidentifiedasamajordriverforthechangeinN2Oemissionswithadoptionofno‐tillagepractices,withemissionsincreasinginhumidclimatesanddecreasingindryclimates(Sixetal.,2004).However,timesinceadoptionofnotillagemightalsoplayarolewithhigheremissionsinitiallyafteradoptionofnotillageinbothhumidanddryclimates,butovertimeemissionsfromno‐tillagesystemsmaydeclineinhumidclimatesrelativetopreviousemissionsfromfulltillagesystems.Nevertheless,variousfieldstudieshaveshownmixedresults,bothsupportingandcontradictingthefinding.StudiesindrierclimatesoftheGreatPlainshaveshownadecreaseinemissionsevenwhenno‐tillagepracticeshadbeenadoptedforlessthan10years(Kessavalouetal.,1998;Mosieretal.,2006).Long‐termnotillageinmoistclimatesofMinnesotaandCanadaledtobothhigherandloweremissionsofN2O(Druryetal.,2006;Ventereaetal.,2005).
AnotherimportantfactorinfluencingN2Oemissionsundernotillage,andonethatfarmerscanactivelymanage,isfertilizerplacement(vanKesseletal.,2012).Ventereaetal.(2005)foundthatwhennitrogenfertilizerwasplacedonthesurface,N2Oemissionsweregreaterundernotillagethanfulltillage,butthereversewasfoundwhennitrogenfertilizerwasplacedbelow10centimeters.FertilizerplacementingeneralhasbeenfoundtohavedifferingresultsonN2Oemissions,asdiscussedinSection3.2.1.1.However,thefindingsofVentereaetal.(2005)aswellasotherstudies(e.g.,Groffman,1985;VentereaandStanenas,2008)indicatethatdeepernitrogenplacementtendstodecreaseN2Oemissionswhenaccompanyingno‐tillorreduced‐tillagepractices,atleastrelativetofulltillagecroppingsystemsatthesamelocation.TheconflictingresultsassociatedwithN2Oemissionsfromfertilizerapplicationsmaybepartlyexplainedbythetillagepractice.
Inaddition,Lemkeetal.(1998)determinedthatsoilclaycontentexplained92percentofthevariationinN2OemissionsbetweenfulltillageandnotillageacrossmultiplesitesinAlberta.Similarly,Burfordetal.(1981)foundthatemissionsfromno‐tillagepracticesweregreaterthan
![Page 18: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-18
fromfulltillageonsoilswithhigherclaycontentsatastudysiteintheUnitedKingdom.ItisarguedthatsoilswithhigherclaycontentshavehighermoisturecontentandthereforehaveagreaterpotentialforincreasedN2Oemissionsundernotillage.Indeed,Rochette(2008)attributedhigherratesofN2Ofluxfromminimumversusstandardtillagetogreatersoilcompaction,poorsoildrainage,reducedgasdiffusivity,andair‐filledporosityinhighclaysoils.
3.2.1.3 CropRotations,CoverCrops,andCroppingIntensity
Croprotationreferstothesequenceofcropsplantedinafield,withinoracrossyears.Croprotationsvarybylocationandgrowingregion,andmaybepracticedforavarietyofreasonssuchasimprovedeconomicreturns,pestmanagement,diseasecontrol,nutrientmanagementandwateravailability.Asimplerotationmaybeasequenceofcornandsoybeansthatisrepeatedovertime,whilemorecomplexrotationsmightincludeperennialcropssuchasalfalfawithcornandsunflowerrotationoverfiveyears,withthreeyearsofalfalfaandoneyeareachofcornandsunflower.Theactualrotationscanalsovaryfromastrictordertothesequence,particularlyinresponsetomarketdemand,i.e.,opportunisticrotations.Rotationswithhighbiomass‐yieldingcropsorperennialhaycropsorgrasscovercanincreasesoilcarbonstocks(Ogleetal.,2005).
Croppingintensitycanvaryacrossyears,duetovariationsinfallowfrequencyanduseofmultiplegrowingseasonswithmorethanonecropplantedandharvestedinasingleyear.Forexample,insemi‐aridenvironments,croprotationsoftenincludeayear‐longfallowperiodinordertoincreasetheamountofwaterstoredinthesoilprofileforthesubsequentcrop.Thislimitstheamountoforganicmatterinputtothesoil,andwiththeseverewaterlimitation,thesecroppingsystemsproducesmallamountsofbiomass,leadingtoareductioninsoilcarbonstocks(Doranetal.,1998).Consequently,intensifyingcropproductionbyreducingfallowfrequency,whichwillgenerallyinvolveadoptionofno‐tillagepractices,willincreasecarboninputacrossthewholerotationandpossiblytheamountofsoilorganiccarbon(Sherrodetal.,2003;2005).
Wintercovercropscanalsobeusedtoprovideplantcoveroutsideofthenormalgrowingseason.Priortoplantingthefollowingsummercrop,thecovercropiseitherlefttodecomposeasagreencoverorharvestedforforage.Ingeneral,theinclusionofacovercropinacroprotationwillleadtoanincreaseinsoilcarbonduetotheincreasedcarboninputderivedfromthecovercrop(Kongetal.,2005),especiallycovercroproots(KongandSix,2010).Covercropscanalsobeusedeffectivelyfornitrogenmanagement.InthefallandspringtheycancapturesoilnitrogenthatwouldotherwisebetransformeddirectlytoN2ObysoilmicrobesorleachtogroundwaterandcontributetoindirectN2Oemissions(i.e.,offsiteemissionsduetonitrogenlossesfromthesite).Additionally,whenkilledpriortoplantingthemaincrop,theirdecompositioncanprovidenitrogenthatwilldisplacesomeportionofcropfertilizationrequirements(whethermanufacturedororganic).Therefore,covercropscanreduceindirectN2Oemissionsandpossiblyoffsetfertilizationrates.However,therearenostudiesdemonstratingthataddingnitrogentosoilsincovercropsratherthanthroughfertilizationwillreducedirectN2Oemissions.Inthefuture,covercropbiomassmayalsobeharvestedforcellulosicethanolfeedstock,leavingrootstoenhancesoilcarbonstockssimilartoperennialplantsgrowninrotation(Ogleetal.,2005).
Theeffectsofcroprotationandintensityonsoilorganiccarboncanalsointeractwithothermanagementpractices,suchasresiduemanagement,tillage,andirrigation(Eghballetal.,1994).Consequently,managementinteractionsamongpracticesincludingtillageandirrigationwillbeimportantindeterminingtheinfluenceofcroprotationsonGHGemissions.Additionally,cropselectionasacomponentofcroprotationcanhaveamajoreffectonN2Oemissions(CavigelliandParkin,2012)insofarascropscanvaryintheirnitrogenuseefficienciesandnitrogenfertilizerneeds.Thisisparticularlythecasewhenlong‐livedperennialcropsaresubstitutedforannualcropsinforageorcellulosicbiofuelcroppingsystems(Robertsonetal.,2011).
![Page 19: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-19
3.2.1.4 Irrigation
Typesofirrigationsystemsincludesurfaceorfloodirrigation,(micro‐)sprinklerirrigation,subsurfacedripirrigation,andsubirrigation.Ingeneral,irrigationincreasessoilwatercontent,evapotranspirationrates,andrelativehumidity;decreasessoilandairtemperatures;andcanleadtoincreasedregionalprecipitation(LobellandBonfils,2008;Pielkeetal.,2007).ThesechangesaffectimportantprocessessuchasplantgrowthratesandsoilmicrobialactivitythatcontrolnetGHGfluxes.
Assoilwatercontentapproachessaturation,oxygen(O2)diffusionisinhibited,resultinginanaerobicconditionsthatcanenhanceCH4emissions(ChanandParkin,2001;Delgadoetal.,1996),oratleastreducetheCH4sinkstrengthofotherwiseaerobicsoils(Livesleyetal.,2010).SaturatedconditionsalsoenhancedenitrificationratesandpotentiallyN2Oemissions(Delgadoetal.,1996;Jambertetal.,1997;Livesleyetal.,2010),butnotethatpeakN2OemissionsfromdenitrificationoftenoccuratwatercontentslowerthansaturationbecausewhenO2isextremelylimiting,N2OislikelytobefurtherreducedtoN2beforediffusingfromthesoilsurfacetotheatmosphere(Davidson,1991;Dunfieldetal.,1995).Furthermore,nitrificationratespeakatapproximately50percentofsaturation,andwatercontentsclosetofieldcapacity(60to70percentofsaturation)areexpectedtosupportmaximumtotalN2Oemissionrates(Davidson,1991).Inaddition,irrigationcanincreaseindirectN2OemissionsbyenhancingNO3‐leachingandrunoffifmorewaterisaddedthanisevaporated(Gehletal.,2005;Spaldingetal.,2001).
WettingofdrysoilstypicallyincreasesCO2emissions(FiererandSchimel,2002).However,irrigationalsoincreasesplantgrowthratesand,therefore,soilorganiccarbonlevelstypicallyincreaseafteruplandcroppingisconvertedtoirrigatedcropping,althoughlossofsoilcarbonfromerosioncanalsoincreaseunderirrigation(Follett,2001;Laletal.,1998).Furthermore,irrigationcanaffectinorganiccarbonlevels,butcurrentavailabledatashowcontrastingresults(Blanco‐Canquietal.,2010;Denefetal.,2008;Entryetal.,2004).
FloodandSurfaceIrrigation:Floodirrigationinvolvesfloodingtheentirefieldwithwater.Undercontinuouslyfloodedconditions,soilsarehighlyanoxic,thusfacilitatinghighmethanogenesisanddenitrificationrates(Mosieretal.,2004).However,highdenitrificationratesdonotnecessarilyimplyhighN2OemissionsbecausetheextremelyanoxicconditionsfacilitatefurtherreductionofN2OtoN2beforeitisemittedfromthesoil(Mahmoodetal.,2008).ThisissupportedbyobservationsshowinghigherN2Oemissionsfromintermittentcomparedtocontinuouslyfloodedricesystems(Katayanagietal.,2012;Xuetal.,2012),althoughitremainsdifficulttopredicttherelativeportionofdenitrifiednitrogenthatisemittedasN2OrelativetoN2.
Surfaceirrigationalsoinvolvessupplyinglargeamountsofwatertothesurfaceofsoils,butinthiscasethewaterisaddedthroughfurrowsadjacenttocropbeds.Thesesystemsareoftennotveryefficient,becausewaterlossesfromevaporationandseepagecanbelarge.TheimpactoffurrowirrigationonGHGemissionsdependsonhowoftenandtheextenttowhichfurrowsarefilledwithwater.WettinganddryingcyclesarelikelytoemitlargepulsesofNOandN2O(Davidson,1992),aswellasCO2(FiererandSchimel,2002).Spatialvariabilitycanalsobehigh,suchasthehigherN2Oemissionsfromfurrowscomparedwithbedsthathavebeenobservedforirrigatedcottoncropping(Graceetal.,2010).Inaddition,microtolandscapescaleheterogeneityinenvironmentalconditions,duetotopographyandotherfactors,contributetomultiscalevariabilityinN2Oemissions(Hénaultetal.,2012;Yatesetal.,2006).ThisspatialandtemporalheterogeneityinenvironmentalconditionsandfluxratesmakesitverydifficulttoquantifyGHGfluxesfromthesetypesofsystemswithhighlevelsofaccuracyandprecision.
SprinklerSystems:Sprinklersystemsdeliverwatertovegetationandthesoilfromabovethesurfaceusingoverheadsprinklersorguns.Thisisusuallymoreefficientthansurfaceirrigation,but
![Page 20: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-20
evaporativelossesfromwaterinterceptedbyvegetation,litter,andthesoilsurfacecanstillbesubstantial.Duringandshortlyafterirrigationevents,soilmaybecomesaturatedandemitpulsesofN2O,butbecausethesoilisnotcontinuouslysaturated,N2Oemissionsareexpectedtobelowercomparedwithsurfaceirrigation(NelsonandTerry,1996).BothN2Oemissionsandsoilcarbonlevelsareexpectedtoincreasewithsprinklerirrigationcomparedwithuplandcropping.
SurfaceandSubsurfaceDripIrrigation:Surfacedripirrigationsupplieswaterfromdriplinesplacedadjacenttocroprows.Evaporativelossesshouldbelesscomparedwithabove‐surfacesprinklersystems,becauselesswaterisinterceptedbygrowingvegetation.However,evaporativelossescanstilloccurtotheextentthatsurfacelitterandsoillayersabsorbwaterfromthedripsprinkler.TheimpactsofsurfacedripirrigationonGHGfluxesareexpectedtobesimilartothoseofsprinklersystems,althoughthereisearlyevidencethatbothsurfaceandsubsurfacedripirrigationleadstolessemissionsofCH4andN2O(Kallenbachetal.,2010;Kennedyetal.,2013).
Subsurfacedripirrigationtargetswaterdeliverytotherootzoneusingburiedpipesandtubing.Thesesystemscanbeveryefficient,becausewaterisconcentratedintherootzoneataslow,steadyrate,henceminimizingoreliminatingevaporationlossesandavoidingsaturationofthewholesoilprofile.Consequently,thesesystemsarenotexpectedtobelargeCH4sources(DelGrossoetal.,2000a).Soilwatercontenthaslesstemporalvariationwithsubsurfacedripirrigationcomparedwithsprinklerandsurfacesystems,sopulsesofN2OandCO2emissionsarealsoexpectedtobeofsmallermagnitude(Kallenbachetal.,2010).Similarly,subsurfacedripirrigation/fertigationofhighvaluescrops,suchastomatoes,hasbeenshowntoreduceN2Oemissionscomparedwithfurrowirrigation(Kennedyetal.,2013).
Subirrigation:Subirrigationisusedinareaswithrelativelyhighwatertablesandinvolvesartificiallyraisingthewatertabletoallowthesoiltobemoistenedfrombelowtherootzone.Becausewaterissuppliedtorootsfrombelow,evaporationlossesarenotenhancedastheywouldbewithsurfaceirrigationsystems.ThissystemcandecreaseNO3‐leaching(Elmietal.,2003)butmayincreaseN2Olossesfromdenitrification(Munozetal.,2005).
ManagementInteractions:Irrigationsystemsinteractwithothercropmanagementstrategiessuchaschangesincroprotation,croppingintensity,tillage,andfertilizeramounttocontrolnetGHGfluxes.IrrigationtendstoamplifytheeffectsofthesefactorsonN2OandCH4emissionsatthesametimeasthepracticesincreasecropyieldsandsoilcarbonstocks.However,theresponseofsoilcarbontoirrigationiscomplexanddrivenbyinteractingfactors.Whenwaterandnutrientstressarereducedthroughirrigationandfertilization,theportionoftotalplantproductionallocatedbelowgroundcandecrease,butabsolutebelowgroundproductionandsoilorganiccarboncanincrease(Bhatetal.,2007).Howevernotallexperimentsshowincreasedsoilcarbonwithirrigation(Denefetal.,2008).Consequently,theirrigationbenefitsofincreasedyieldsandpotentialcarbonstoragemaybecounter‐balancedwiththeincreasedN2OandCH4fluxes.
However,therearealsooptionsforlimitingemissions,particularlywithfertilization.Fertigationaddsnutrientstotheirrigationsystemtodeliverwateralongwithsolublenutrientstotherootzone.Thesesystemshavethepotentialtobeveryefficientfrombothnutrientandwateruseperspectives(Spaldingetal.,2001),becausetheslowandtimedsupplyofnutrientsandwaterismoresynchronouswithplantdemandandtheyareconcentratedintherootzone.Consequently,N2Oandothernitrogenlossesareminimizedwhileplantgrowth,carboninputs,andcarbonsequestrationcanbemaximized.Similarly,CH4emissionsareminimizedbecausesoilsaturationisavoided.
![Page 21: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-21
3.2.1.5 ErosionControl
Soilerosionprocessesincludesoildetachment,transport,anddeposition.Soilerosioncanpotentiallyreducesoilcarbonstocksandincreasenetcarbonfluxtotheatmospherethroughdecreasedplantproductivityandsubsequentdecreasedorganicmatterinputtosoilandincreaseddecompositionoftheerodedsoilfraction(Lal,2003).However,soilerosioncanalsopotentiallyincreasenetsoilcarbonstocksanddecreasenetcarbonfluxtotheatmospherethroughdynamicreplacementofsoilcarbononerodedlandscapesanddecreaseddecompositionratesinzonesofsoildeposition(Hardenetal.,1999;Stallard,1998).
Lal(2003)estimatedthat20percentofcarboninerodedsoilisemittedtotheatmosphere,duetooxidationofsoilorganiccarbonfollowingthedisruptionofsoilaggregatescausedbydetachmentandtransport.However,inananalysisof1,400soilprofiles,VanOostetal.(2007)foundnegligiblecarbonlossasadirectresultofsoildetachmentandtransport.Atsiteswherethetransportedsoilwasdeposited,therewasaslight(~onepercent)decreaseinsoilcarbondecompositionrates,resultinginslightlyhighersoilcarbonaccumulation.Moreimportantly,itwasfoundthatonaverage,25percentoferodedcarbonwasreplacedontheerodedsitesovera50‐yearperiod(Hardenetal.,2008).Thecombinationofthesefindingssupportsanapproximate26percentsinkcapacityoferodedsoil(VanOostetal.,2007).
Theaccumulationofsoilcarbononerodedlocationswithinlandscapesisreferredtoasdynamicreplacement(Hardenetal.,1999).Dynamicreplacementoccursasaresultofsoilcarbonbuildingtowardasteadystateofsoilcarboncontent,constrainedbysoiltypeandclimate(WestandSix,2007).Steadystateoccurswhensoilcarbonaccumulationequalssoilcarbonlosses.BothVanOostetal.(2007)andLalandPimentel(2008)notethatthedynamicreplacementratemaybelowinareaswithlowercroplandproductioninputs.Forexample,dynamicreplacementmaybelowincropsystemswithlowresidueproduction,suchascottonandtobaccointheUnitedStates,whichhavelowercarbonaccumulationratesthanhighresidueinputscrops(Ogleetal.,2005).
Notethatwhilewatererosioncangenerateasmallcarbonsink,thebenefitofacarbonsinkisoffsetbyothernegativeimpactsfromsoilerosion.Forexample,soilerosioncanresultinwaterpollutionduetosedimentloading,airpollutionfromairborneparticulatematter(PM10),anddecreasedsoilfertilityresultinginsubsequentyielddeclines.
3.2.1.6 ManagementofDrainedWetlands
Drainageofwetlandseffectivelycreatesanuplandcroppingsystembyloweringwatertableswithtilesorditchestoproduceannualcrops.Themostobviouseffectofwetlanddrainageisincreasedoxidationandtillageofsoils.Forexample,conversionofnativewetlandsandgrasslandsintocroplandhasbeenshowntodepletenativesoilcarbonstocksby20tomorethan50percent(BlankandFosberg,1989;Eulissetal.,2006;Mann,1986).Inturn,CO2emissionsincreasewithhigherdecompositionrates,particularlyinorganicsoils,i.e.,Histosols(Allen,2012;ArmentanoandMenges,1986).LossoftheorganiclayerhascausedtremendoussubsidenceinU.S.croplands(Stephensetal.,1984)suchastheFloridaEverglades(Shihetal.1998)andtheCaliforniaDeltaregion(Broadbent,1960;Weir,1950),whereratesvaryfrom0.46to2.3cmyear‐1(DeverelandRojstaczer,1996;Devereletal.,1998;RojstaczerandDeverel,1995).SimilarsubsidencerateshavealsooccurredinotherregionssuchastheFloridaEverglades.
Manipulationofwaterlevelscanhavemultipleeffectsonnutrientcyclinginwetlands.Drainagealsomayresultinmoreoptimalsoilmoistureconditions(e.g.,40to60%water‐filledporespace)thatenhanceformationofN2Oasabyproductofnitrificationanddenitrificationreactions(Davidsonetal.,2000).DrainageincreasesnitrogenmineralizationrateswithconversionfromanaerobictoaerobicconditionsandenhancesN2Oemissions(Duxburyetal.,1982;Kasimir‐
![Page 22: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-22
Klemedtssonetal.,1997).Incontrast,drainagedecreasesCH4emissionsbyreducingthefrequencyanddurationofsoilsaturationrequiredforCH4productionaswellasenhancingfrequencyofmethanotrophicactivity(Dorretal.,1993;Gleasonetal.,2009;PhillipsandBeeri,2008).However,insituationswherewetlandsareinacropproduction,butnotdirectlydrained,CH4productioncanactuallybeenhancedduetoincreasedrunofffromadjacentcroplandsorconsolidationdrainage,whichincreaseswaterdepthandhydroperiods(Gleasonetal.,2009).
ManagingthewatertablebyraisingthedepthofdrainagetotheextentpossiblehasbeenaneffectivemeasuretoreducelossofCO2andotherGHGsfromdrainedorganicsoils(Jongedyketal.,1950;Shihetal.,1998).RecentresearchsuggeststhatevenperiodicfloodingoforganicsoilsthataredrainedforcropproductionmaybeeffectiveinreducingCO2emissions(Morrisetal.,2004).Thereislimitedinformationontheeffectofdrainageinmineralsoilswithahighwatertable(i.e.,hydricsoils),buttheinfluenceonGHGemissionsislikelylesssignificantthanindrainedorganicsoils.Itisimportanttonotethatwetlandsareaffordedsomeprotectionbylaws(e.g.,CleanWaterAct)andconservationprogramsthatrecognizetheimportanceofwetlands,suchasforwildlifehabitat,andprovideagriculturalproducersincentivestoavoiddrainingwetlands(e.g.,the“Swampbuster”provisionoftheFoodSecurityAct).
3.2.1.7 LimeAmendments
Agriculturallimeconsistsprimarilyofcrushedlimestone(CaCO3)anddolomite(CaMg(CO3)2)invaryingproportions.Agriculturallime,hereinafterreferredtoaslime,isappliedtosoilstodecreasesoilacidity.Limeiscommonlyappliedtoagriculturallandswherenitrogenousfertilizersarecontinuouslyusedandwhereprecipitationexceedsevapotranspiration.
TheapplicationoflimetosoilscancreateasinkorsourceofCO2totheatmosphere(Hamiltonetal.,2007),dependingonthestrengthoftheweatheringagent.Weatheringoflimebycarbonicacid(H2CO3),formedwhenCO2isdissolvedinwater,resultsintheuptakeofonemoleofCO2foreverymoleoflime‐derivedcarbondissolved(Eq.1).Carbonicacidweatheringproducesbicarbonate(HCO3‐)thatcontributestoalkalinityingroundwater,streams,andrivers(OhandRaymond,2006;Raymondetal.,2008).Alternatively,whenlimereactswiththestrongernitricacid(HNO3),whichisproducedwhennitrifyingbacteriaconvertNH4+basedfertilizerandothersourcesofNH4+tonitrate(NO3‐),carboninlimeisdissolvedandreleaseddirectlytotheatmosphere(Eq.2).
CaCO3+H2O+CO2=Ca2++2HCO3‐ Eq.1
CaCO3+2HNO3=Ca2++2NO3‐+H2O+CO2 Eq.2
Fieldmeasurementsandmodelinganalysesindicatethatmorelimeisdissolvedbycarbonicacidthanbynitricacid.Forexample,WestandMcBride(2005)estimatedthat62percentoflimewasdissolvedbycarbonicacidweathering,Hamiltonetal.(2007)estimated75to88percent,andOhandRaymond(2006)estimated66percent.Biasietal.(2008)usedchamberfluxmeasurementstoestimate15percentlossoflime‐derivedcarbonbydissolutionwithstrongacidsandinferredthat85percentisdissolvedbycarbonicacid.
WestandMcBride(2005)alsoestimatedtheprecipitationofHCO3‐backtoCaCO3onceHCO3‐reachestheocean,therebyreleasingCO2totheatmosphere.However,thelongtimeperiod(manydecadestocenturies)overwhichprecipitationwouldoccurintheocean(Hamiltonetal.,2007)effectivelyresultsincarbonsequestrationforannualaccountingpurposes.
Currentconsensusofleacheddrainagesamples,streamgaugedata,andmassbalancemodelingindicatesthatabout66percentofcarboninappliedlimeisessentiallytransferredfromonelong‐livedpool(CaCO3ingeologicformations)toanother(HCO3‐inoceans),andisthereforenotcountedasnewsequestration.However,theatmosphericCO2newlycapturedbythisprocessdoes
![Page 23: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-23
representsequestrationwhencorrectedforthe33percentreleasedtotheatmosphereasCO2;thisresultsinanet33percentsinkstrengthpercarboninlime.ThisestimateissimilartothatofOhandRaymond(2006)andWestandMcBride(2005),andiswithintherangeofHamiltonetal.(2007).Whilelimecanincreasesoilcarbonviaeffectsonsoilmicrobialactivity(Fornaraetal.,2011),inmostsoilsliminghasnodirectcarboneffect(Pageetal.,2009).
3.2.1.8 ResidueManagement
Cropresiduesaretheresidualremainingafterharvestoftheeconomicpartofthecrop.Theamountofcropresiduevarieswiththecropandtheharvestoperationmethod.Forexample,cottonharvestcontributesverylittleabovegroundresiduetothesoilduetotheplant’slowleafareaindexandsmallamountofplantmaterialafterleafdrop.SoybeanandotherlegumecropsalsohavesmallamountsofabovegroundresiduethatrapidlydecomposebecauseoflowC:Nratios.Incontrast,cropslikecorncanleavesubstantialamountsofresidueonthesoilsurfaceunlessthewholeplantisharvestedforsilageortheresidueiscollectedforbeddingorotherpurposes.
Abovegroundresiduemanagemententailsfivepotentialstrategies:(1)leavetheresidueonthesoilsurfacetodecayandbeincorporatedintothesoil(requiresno‐tillmanagement);(2)incorporatetheresidueintothesoilviatillage;(3)removetheresiduethroughaharvestingoperation(i.e.,silageorcellulosicbiomassharvest);(4)allowlivestocktograzeontheresidue;or(5)burntheresidue.EachofthesemanagementpracticeshasthepotentialtoaffectGHGemissions.LeavingcropresidueonthesurfaceandincorporatingitintothesoilafterdecaybymicroorganismsaffectsCO2releasefromthesoilduetotheenhancedbiologicalactivity,andpotentiallyincreasesN2Oemissionsthroughanalterationofthenitrogenbalanceinthesoil.Asimilarprocessoccurswhenresidueisincorporatedintothesoilviatillage.Notethattillagealsocausesreductionsinsoilcarbonstocks,andadditionalCO2isreleasedthroughburningfueltoruntillageequipment.HarvestingtheresiduereleasesCO2fromburningfuelintheengineslinkedwiththeharvestingprocess,althoughresidueharvestedforbiofuelproductionmaycreatenetfossilfueloffsetcredits.BurningcropresiduesinthefieldreleasesCO2,CH4,andN2O(aswellasCOandNOx)emissionstotheatmosphere.Ingeneral,butnotalways,residueremovalreducessoilcarbonstocks(GreggandIzaurralde,2010;Wilhelmetal.,2007).
ManagementinteractionsarealsoimportantwhenconsideringtheinfluenceofresiduemanagementonGHGemissions.Forexample,theinfluenceofresiduemanagementonsoilorganiccarbonwillbeaffectedbythetillagepractices(Malhietal.,2006).
3.2.1.9 Set‐Aside/ReserveCropland
The1985FarmBillestablishedtheConservationReserveProgram(CRP)topayproducerstoconverthighlyerodiblecroplandorotherenvironmentallysensitiveagriculturalareasintovegetativecover.Theseareascouldbeconvertedintograssland,nativebunchgrasses,pollinatorhabitat,shelterbelts,filterorbufferstrips,orriparianbuffers.Areasareremovedfromproductionandseededwithannualandperennialspeciestoformacoverthatwouldbeundisturbedforaminimumof10years.Inreturn,producersorlandownersreceivedapaymentforenrollingtheselandareasintotheCRP.ThroughouttheagriculturalhistoryoftheUnitedStates,therehavebeentimesinwhichagriculturallandsweresetasidetoreduceagriculturalsurpluses;however,thetimeperiodofremovalwastypicallyshort‐term(onetotwoyears)andmaintainedinaweed‐freestate.
TheprimaryaimsofCRParetodecreaseerosion,restorewildlifehabitat,andsafeguardgroundandsurfacewaterquality.Animportantancillaryaimiscarboncapture:CRPlandssequestercarboninsoilandlong‐livedplants,andthusrepresentavaluablemitigationopportunity.Inameta‐analysisofpairedsoils,Ogleetal.(2005)foundthat20yearsofset‐asideresultedintemperateregionsoils’accumulating82to93percentofthecarbonlevelsunderoriginalnative
![Page 24: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-24
vegetation,onaverage.PostandKwon(2000)concludedfromaglobalmeta‐analysisthat,onaverage,soilcarbonsequestrationratesonlandconvertedfromagriculturalproductiontograsslandis33gCm‐2year‐1.At39pairedCRP‐cropsitesinWisconsin,Kucharik(2007)foundsequestrationratesof50gCm‐2year‐1onMollisolsand44gCm‐2y‐1onAlfisols.Follettetal.(2009)estimatethatCRPsoilssequester~50gCm‐2year‐1onaverage.TheCouncilforAgriculturalScienceandTechnology(2011)estimatesthatCRPlandsarecurrentlyresponsiblefor6.3Tgofsoilcarbonsequestrationperyear.Gebhartetal.(1994)reportedamean18.8percentincreaseonfiveCRPsitesduringasix‐yearperiod.However,therearestudiesshowinglittleornoincreaseinC,leadingtouncertaintyintheeffectofset‐asidelandinareserveprogram(JelinskiandKucharik,2009;Karlenetal.,1999;Reederetal.,1998).Forexample,Karlenetal.(1999)comparedCRPlandwithperennialgrassestocroplandacrossfiveStatesandfoundthatonlyonesiteofthefiveshowedasignificantdifferenceintotalorganiccarboncontentinthesoilafterbeinginCRP.
IncreasesinsoilcarbonresultingfromsettingasidecroplandinCRPcanbereversedbyconvertingtheselandsbackintoproduction.Gilleyetal.(1997)foundthatthepositivechangesinCRPlanddisappearedimmediatelywhenthesoilsweretilleduponconversionbackintocropproduction.However,manystudiesindicatethatiflandunderCRPisreturnedtocultivation,someorallofthesoilcarboncanpotentiallyberetainedifthelandiscultivatedwithno‐tillpractices(BowmanandAnderson,2002;Daoetal.,2002;Olsonetal.,2005).Inadditiontochangesinsoilcarbonstocks,changeswillalsooccurinN2Oemissionsdependingonthenutrientmanagementpractices.Gelfandetal.(2011)measuredanetcarboncostof10.6MgCO2‐eqha‐1(289gC‐eqm‐2)forthefirstyearofno‐tillsoybeansfollowing20yearsofCRPgrassland,andasignificantportionofthenetemissionwasduetoN2Oproducedintheconversionyear.
3.2.1.10 Biochar
Biocharisasoilamendmentthatispromotedforitsabilitytoimprovecropproductionandsequestercarboninsoils(Atkinsonetal.,2010;Lehmann,2007a;2007b).Biocharischarcoalproducedwhenwoodorotherplantbiomassisburnedunderlow‐oxygenconditions,knownaspyrolysis.Whenappliedtosoils,biocharcanpersistforlongperiodsoftime;itschemicalstructuremakesitresistanttomicrobialattackundermostsoilconditions.However,itspersistencecanvarygreatlyforreasonsnotyetcompletelyunderstood.BiocharisacommoncomponentofmostU.S.agriculturalsoils(Skjemstadetal.,2002),leftfromfiresthatoccurredpriortoconversionoftheoriginalforestorprairie.Addingbiochartosoilshasbeenproposedasawaytosequestercarbon(Lehmann,2007a)becauseofthispotentialtopersistforcenturies(KimetuandLehmann,2010;Nguyenetal.,2008).Butbiochar’slongevityinsoildependsonanumberoffactorsincludingpyrolysisconditions(e.g.,pyrolysistemperature)andthechemicalcompositionofthebiocharfeedstock(Spokas,2010).Climateandsoilfactorssuchasmineralogyandpre‐existingorganicmattercontentalsoaffectbiochar’spersistenceinsoil.
Anadditionalbenefitofbiocharisitspositiveeffectsonagriculturalsoilfertility(Atkinsonetal.,2010;Lairdetal.,2010),largelybyprovidingadvantagessimilartootherformsofsoilorganicmatter:improvedsoilstructure,waterholdingcapacity,andcation‐exchangecapacity.BiocharhasalsobeenshowntoreducesoilN2Oemissionsinsomelaboratorystudies,butthesmallnumberoffieldtrialssofarreportedhavedocumentednosignificanteffectsunderfieldconditions(e.g.,Scheeretal.,2011).
Itistooearlytoknowifpromisingresultsfromlaboratoryandshort‐termfieldexperimentscanbegeneralizedtolong‐termfieldconditions.Biocharsoiladditionsmaybeafuturesourceofcarboncreditsforpyrolysiswasteiflong‐termfieldexperimentsconfirmresultsfromshortertermstudies.Theclimateadvantageofaddingbiochartosoilislessclear,however,relativetootherpotentialusesofplantbiomass.Lifecycleanalyses(e.g.,Robertsetal.,2010)suggestthatbiocharmay
![Page 25: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-25
increaseordecreasenetemissionsdependingonalternativeusesoftheoriginalbiomassandlifecyclesystemboundaries.Furthermore,ifthebiomass(orbiochar)wasburneddirectlyforenergythenthesourceofdisplacedenergymustalsobeconsidered(Robertsetal.,2010).Nevertheless,boththesequestrationandN2Osuppressionpotentialofbiocharmeritfurtherstudy.
3.2.2 ManagementInfluencingGHGEmissionsinFloodedCroppingSystems
ThereareavarietyoffloodedcroppingsystemsintheUnitedStates,includingsystemsforrice,wildrice,cranberries,andtaro.Apartfromrice,thesesystemsarerelativelyminor(specialtycrops)andthereislittletonoresearchorinformationontheirGHGemissions.RicesystemsemitbothCH4andN2O;however,manyreportsshowaninverserelationshipbetweenCH4andN2Oduringthericecroppingseason,withCH4occurringunderanaerobicconditionsandN2Oemissionsoccurringunderaerobicconditions(Zouetal.,2005).Therefore,toaccuratelydetermineamitigationstrategyoneneedstoconsiderthenetcumulativeeffectofGHGemissionsbyevaluatingbothCH4andN2O.WaterandresiduemanagementhavereceivedthemostattentionintermsofofferingpossibilitiesformitigatingCH4emissions.Othermitigationoptionshavealsobeenexaminedandshowpromise(e.g.,Fengetal.,2013;Linquistetal.,2012;Majumdar,2003;WassmannandPathak,2007;Yagietal.,1997)andfurtherresearchisrequiredinmanyareasbeforetheseoptionscanbescaledup.TheintenthereisnottoprovideareviewoftheliteraturebuttoprovideabriefoverviewofsomefactorsaffectingGHGemissionsfromfloodedricesystems.
3.2.2.1 WaterManagementinFloodedRice
IntheUnitedStates,riceisplantedinoneoftwoways:(1)waterseeded,whereseedsaresownbyairplaneinfloodedfields;or(2)dry‐seeded,whereseedsaredrilledorbroadcast(thenincorporated)intodryfields.WaterseedingisthepredominantpracticeinCaliforniaandpartsofLouisiana,whiledryseedingispredominantinmuchofthesouthernUnitedStates(e.g.,Arkansas,Mississippi,Missouri,andTexas).Watermanagementvariesbetweenthesetwoestablishedpractices.Inwater‐seededrice,thefieldsaretypicallyfloodedfortheentireseason.However,inLouisiana,thefieldmaybedrainedwithapinpointfloodsystem(threetofivedays)orwithadelayedflood(upto20days)afterseeding.Indry‐seededrice,rainfallorflushirrigationeventsarerelieduponduringthefirstthreetofiveweeksofestablishmentandthenfloodedfortherestoftheseason.Inallcases,fieldsaretypicallydrainedafewweeksbeforeharvesttoallowthesoiltodryoutenoughtosupportharvestequipment.FurtherdetailsofU.S.riceproductionsystemscanbefoundinSnyderandSlaton(2001)andStreetandBollich(2003).
MidseasondrainorintermittentirrigationisastrategytomitigateCH4emissions.Thispracticeresultsinaerobicconditionsthatareunfavorableformethanogens.However,suchconditionsarefavorableforN2Oemissions(e.g.,Zouetal.,2005).MoststudiesreportthatmidseasondrainssignificantlydecreaseCH4emissionsbutincreaseN2Oemissionsrelativetocontinuousflooding.Regardless,netGHGemissionsinricesystemsareusuallydecreasedwithmidseasondraindespitetheincreaseinN2O.Wassmanetal.(2000)reportedthatCH4emissionreductionsrangedfromsevenpercentto80percent.ThereductioninCH4emissionsdependsonthenumberofdrainageeventsduringthecroppingseasonandonothermanagementfactorsandsoilproperties.Yanetal.(2005)reportedthatCH4fluxesfromricefieldswithsingleandmultipledrainageeventswerereducedby60percentand52percentcomparedtocontinuouslyfloodedricefields.ThispracticehasnotbeenwidelyevaluatedintheUnitedStates,anditmaybedifficulttodrainandre‐floodthelargerelativelyflatparcelsoflandthatarecommonlyusedforriceproductionintheUnitedStates.Furthermore,suchpracticescanleadtoincreasedweedanddiseasepressurealongwithloweryieldsandgrainquality.
![Page 26: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-26
Soilcarbonstocksarealsoinfluencedbywatermanagement.Forexample,carbonstocksinChinesericesystemsarehigherthaninuplandcrops,presumablyduetotheaccumulationofcarbonunderthefloodedconditions(Panetal.,2010;Wu,2011).ItremainsunknownifeffortstomitigateCH4emissionsintheUnitedStatesusingintermittentfloodingwillleadtoareductioninsoilcarbonstocks.
TheuseofmidseasondrainagehasbeenshowntodelayharvestinCalifornia.Therefore,inclimateswithashortgrowingseason,theuseofamidseasondrainwillincreaseriskofcropfailure,andthereforewillbealessappealingalternativetogrowers.
3.2.2.2 ResidueManagement
StrawmanagementhasalargeimpactonCH4production.Strawadditions,particularlythosewithahighcarbontonitrogenratio,increaseCH4emissionsbuthavethepotentialtoreduceN2Oemissions(e.g.,Zouetal.,2005).ThisreductioninN2OmaybeduetoincreasednitrogenimmobilizationormoreeffectiveconversiontoN2.LowcarbontonitrogenorganicmaterialstendtoincreaseN2Oemissions(Kaewpraditetal.,2008).Yanetal.(2005)reportedthatthetimingofstrawapplicationisalsoanimportantfactor.Forexample,applyingricestrawbeforetransplantingincreasedCH4emissionsby2.1times,whileapplyingricestrawinthepreviousseasonincreasedCH4emissionsby0.8times.SeveralstudieshavedemonstratedthatcompostingricestrawpriortoincorporationreducesCH4emissions(Wassmannetal.,2000);however,thisrequiresadditionalenergytocollectthestrawandthenspreaditbackonthefieldaftercomposting.
IncontrasttothepotentialforreducingCH4emissionswithremovalofricestraw,thereisalsothepotentialtoreducesoilcarbonstocksduetolesscarboninputtosoils.Othernutrients(particularlyK)areremovedinlargeamountswithresidues,andtheseneedtobereplacedtomaintaintheproductivityofthesystem.
3.2.2.3 OrganicAmendments
Variousorganicamendmentscanbeappliedtoricefields,includingfarmyardmanurespecialtymixesoforganicfertilizers,andgreenmanures(e.g.,covercrops).Basedonameta‐analysisbyLinquistetal.(2012),livestockmanureincreasesCH4emissionsby26percentandgreenmanuresincreasedCH4by192percent.NeithermanuresourcehadasignificanteffectonN2Oemissions.FewstudieshaveevaluatedtheinfluenceofdifferentmanurestorageandprocessingtechniquesonCH4emissions.OneexampleisastudybyWassmanetal.(2000),whofoundthatfermentationoffarmyardmanurepriortoapplicationcanreduceCH4emissions.FarmyardmanurewillalsoinfluencesoilcarbonstockandsoilN2Oemissions.
3.2.2.4 Varieties,RatoonCropping,andFallowManagement
SeasonalCH4(Lindauetal.,1995)andN2O(Chen‐Ching,1996)emissionsareaffectedbyricevariety.Thecauseofvarietaldifferencesvarybutmaybeduetogastransportthrougharenchymacells,differentrootingstructures,ordifferencesamongvarietiesintermsofrootexudates(WassmannandAulakh,2000).IdentifyingthemechanismsforvarietaldifferencesmayenablebreedingprogramstoselectvarietiesthathavelowerCH4emissions.
InsomeStates,theclimateallowsre‐sproutingofasecond,orratooncrop,thatgrowsfromthestubbleofthefirstcropafterharvesting.Ratooncropyieldsaresmallerthanthefirstcrop,butcanaddsubstantiallytotheoverallannualyield,therebyreducingcostsofproductionperunit.Inaddition,ittakesfewerresourcesandlesstimetogrowaratooncropthantogrowthefirstcrop.However,ratooninghashigherCH4emissionrates(abouttwotothreetimeshigher)thanthefirstcrop,becausethestrawfromthefirstcropremainsinthefieldunderanaerobicconditionsduringtheratoonperiodratherthanthefieldbeingdrainedsothatthestubblecandecayaerobically
![Page 27: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-27
(Lindauetal.,1995).Therefore,theamountofCH4producingorganicmaterial(i.e.,materialavailableforanaerobicdecomposition)isconsiderablyhigherthanwiththeprimarycrop.
ManagementofricefieldsduringthewinterhasasignificanteffectonannualGHGemissions.Forexample,inCalifornia,legislationinthe1990shaslimitedtheburningofricestrawtoamaximumof25percentofanarea,althoughinrealityonlyabout10percentofriceproductionfieldsareburned.Currently,ricestrawisincorporatedafterharvestonabout85percentofthericeproductionfieldsinCalifornia,andinthesefieldsabouthalfareintentionallyfloodedtofacilitatestrawdecomposition,althoughthisvaluecanvarywidelyfromyeartoyear.WinterfloodinghasincreasedannualCH4emissions(Devitoetal.,2000),butithasalsoincreasedthequalityofhabitatforoverwinteringwaterfowlinthePacificFlyway.Ricestrawisbaledandremovedonaboutfivepercentofthearea.
3.2.2.5 NitrificationandUreaseInhibitorsinFloodedRice
NitrificationinhibitorspreventorslowtheconversionofNH4+toNO3‐andthusreduceN2Oemissionsfromnitrificationandsubsequentdenitrification.Inameta‐analysisoftheseproducts,Akiyamaetal.(2010)foundthatinricesystemstheuseofnitrificationinhibitorsonaveragereducedN2Oemissionsby30percent,althoughsomeproductsweremoreeffectivethanothers.Certainnitrificationinhibitors(i.e.,dicyandiamide,thiosulfate,andencapsulatedcalciumcarbide)canmitigatebothCH4andN2Oemissions.ReducedCH4emissionsusingdicyandiamidewasattributedtoahigherredoxpotential,lowerpH,lowerFe2+,andlowerreadilymineralizablecarboncontent(Bharatietal.,2000).
Ureaseinhibitors,suchashydroquinone,slowthemicrobialconversionofureatoNH4+,thusreducingtheamountofnitrogenavailablefornitrificationanddentrification.BothCH4andN2Oemissionswerereducedwiththeuseofhydroquinone(Boeckxetal.,2005).ItissuggestedthatureaseinhibitorsmitigateCH4emissionbyinhibitingthemethanogenicfermentationofacetate(Wangetal.,1991).Furthermore,acombinationofaureaseinhibitor(hydroquinone)andanitrificationinhibitor(dicyandiamide)wasshowntoresultinlowerGHGemissionscomparedwithusingonlyoneoftheproducts(Boeckxetal.,2005).SeeSection3.2.1.1formoreinformationonnitrificationandureaseinhibitors.
3.2.2.6 FertilizerPlacementinFloodedRice
Incorporating/injectingorplacingfertilizerdeepintothesoilhasbeenshowninsomestudiestoreducebothCH4(Wassmannetal.,2000)andN2O(Keerthisingheetal.,1995)emissions.Whilemuchofafloodedricefield’ssoilisanaerobic,thefloodwaterandtopfewcentimetersofsoiltypicallyremainaerobicwhilesoilbelowfivecentimetersexistsinananaerobic,reducedstate(KeeneyandSahrawat,1986).Thusmineralnitrogeninthetopfewcentimetersofsoilmayundergonitrificationanddenitrification,whichcanleadtoN2Oemissions;butmineralnitrogeninlowersoildepthswillremainasammonium.Incontrast,nitrogenfertilizerthatisappliedtothesoilsurface(eitherpreseasonormidseason)tendsbemoresusceptibletolosseseitherfromammoniavolatilizationormorerapidnitrification‐denitrificationprocesses(Griggsetal.,2007).Byplacingnitrogenintoanaerobicsoillayers,itisbetterprotectedfromlossesandremainsavailableforcropnitrogenuptake(Linquistetal.,2009).TheeffectofdeepfertilizerplacementonCH4reductionremainsuncertain.SeeSection3.2.1.1formoreinformationonfertilizerplacement.
3.2.2.7 SulfurProducts
Sulfur‐containingfertilizers(i.e.,ammoniumsulfate,calciumsulfate,phosphogypsum,andsinglesuperphosphate)reduceCH4emissions(Lindauetal.,1998).ThemagnitudeofCH4reductionisdependentonfertilizationratewithaveragesbetween208and992kgSha‐1,reducingCH4
![Page 28: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-28
emissionsby28percentand53percent,respectively(Linquistetal.,2012).Atlowlevelsofsulfurfertilization,whicharecommoninrecommendedrates,theeffectonCH4emissionswillbelimited(Linquistetal.,2012).SulfurmitigatesCH4emissionsintwoways.First,SO4additionstosoiladdelectronacceptors,thusslowingsoilreduction(Majumdar,2003).Second,theproductofSO4reduction(H2S)mayinhibitmethanogenicbacteriaandthusdepressCH4production.Unfortunately,moststudieshavenotexaminedtheeffectonN2Oemissions.
3.2.3 Land‐UseChangetoCropland
Conversionfromoneland‐usecategory(e.g.,forestland,wetlands)tocroplandcanhavesignificanteffectsontheGHGemissionsandremovalsassociatedwiththelandunderconversion.Whenlandisconvertedtocropland,thereisoftenalossofcarbon,anincreaseinN2OandCH4emissions,areductioninCH4oxidation,andifbiomassisburned,anincreaseinnon‐CO2GHGemissions.Anumberofvariablesinfluencethedirectionandmagnitudeoftheemissionsandsinksincludingpriorlanduse,climate,andmanagement.Theinfluenceofland‐usechangeoncarbon,nitrogen,methane,andnon‐CO2GHGsarediscussedbelow.
3.2.3.1 InfluenceonCarbonStocks
Land‐useconversiontocroplandcanhavesignificanteffectsonbiomass,litter,andsoilcarbon(IPCC,2000).Houghtonetal.(1999)estimatedthatlandclearanceintheUnitedStateshasledtoalossof27PgCtotheatmospheresincethe1700s,althoughrecentlysomecarbonhasbeenrestoredwithconversionofcroplandbacktootherusesandalsoimprovedsoilmanagement(U.S.EPA,2010).ClearingforestleadstoalargelossofabovegroundandbelowgroundbiomassandlitterC;grasslandconversioncanalsoreducetheamountofcarboninthesepools,buttoalesserextentthanforestconversionbecausegrasslandshavelessbiomass.Soilcarbonlossescanbesignificantwithconversiontocultivatedcropmanagement(DavidsonandAckerman,1993),withrelativelossesintemperateregionsfrom20to30percentonaverage(Ogleetal.,2005).
Ultimately,thenetinfluenceoflandconversionwilldependonthepreviouslanduse,vegetationcomposition,andmanagement,andtheresultingcroplandsystemanditsassociatedvegetationcompositionandmanagement.Forexample,conversionofgrasslandtotreecrops,suchasorchards,mayleadtogainsincarbonrelativetothegrasslandduetoaccumulationofcarboninwoodybiomass.
3.2.3.2 InfluenceonSoilNitrousOxide
Theconversionoflandtocroplandgenerallyacceleratesnitrogencycling,withsubsequenteffectsonN2OandCH4fluxes.SoilnitrogenavailabilityisthefactorthatmostoftenlimitssoilN2Oemissions(seeSection3.2.1.1),soanypracticethatincreasestheconcentrationofinorganicnitrogeninsoilislikelytoalsoaccelerateN2Oemissions.Asnotedabove,land‐usechangetypicallyresultsinfastersoilorganicmatterturnoverandassociatednitrogenmineralization,whichmeansthatevenintheabsenceofnitrogenfertilizer,soilN2Ofluxeswillbehigheronconvertedland.Additionalnitrogenfromfertilizers,whethersyntheticororganic,orfromplantedlegumeswillfurtherenhanceN2Ofluxes,aswilltillage—insofarastillagestimulatesnitrogenmineralization.
TheconversionofunmanagedlandtocellulosicbiofuelproductionmayavoidadditionalGHGloadingifcareistakentoavoidsoilcarbonoxidationandexcesssoilnitrogenavailability(Robertsonetal.,2011).Thismightoccur,forexample,ifexistingperennialvegetationwereharvestedforfeedstockorwhennewperennialgrassesweredirect‐seededintoanotherwiseundisturbedsoilprofile,andwhennoorminimalnitrogeninputsareused.Althoughthecurrentmarketforcellulosicbiomassisnascentatbest,asitdevelopsinresponsetolegislativemandatesandenergydemandtherewillbepressuretoconvertlandsnowunmanagedintobiofuelcropping
![Page 29: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-29
systems.MinimizingtheGHGimpactoftheseconversionswillbecrucialforavoidinglong‐termcarbondebtthatwillotherwiseleadtocarbonsourcesratherthancarbonsinks,irrespectiveoftheircapacitytogeneratefossilfueloffsetcredits(Fargioneetal.,2008;Gelfandetal.,2011;Pineiroetal.,2009).
3.2.3.3 InfluenceonMethanotrophicActivity
Methanotrophicbacteriacapableofconsuming(oxidizing)atmosphericCH4arefoundinmostaerobicsoils.CH4uptakeinsoilsisgloballyimportant;thesizeofthesoilsinkisthesamemagnitudeastheatmosphericincreaseinCH4(IPCC,2001),suggestingthatsignificantchangesinthestrengthofthesoilsinkcouldsignificantlyaffectatmosphericCH4concentrationsifuptakedeclinesduetolanduseandmanagement.Inunmanageduplandecosystems,CH4uptakeiscontrolledlargelybytherateatwhichitdiffusestothesoilmicrositesinhabitedbyactivemethanotrophs.Diffusionisregulatedbyphysicalfactors—principallymoisturebutalsotemperature,soilstructure,andtheconcentrationofCH4inthesoil.
AgriculturalmanagementtypicallydiminishessoilCH4oxidationby70percentormore(Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000)foratleastaslongasthesoilisfarmed.Themechanismforthissuppressionisnotwellunderstood;likelyitisrelatedtonitrogenavailabilityasaffectedbyenhancednitrogenmineralization,fertilizer,andothernitrogeninputs(Steudleretal.,1989;SuwanwareeandRobertson,2005).NH4+isknowntocompetitivelyinhibitmethanemonooxygenase,theprincipalenzymeresponsibleforoxidationatatmosphericconcentrations.Microbialdiversityalsoseemstoplayanimportantrole(Levineetal.,2011).
TherearenoknownagronomicpracticesthatpromotesoilCH4oxidation;althoughabetterunderstandingofthemechanismsresponsibleforitssuppressionmayeventuallysuggestmitigationopportunities.Todate,recoveryofsignificantCH4oxidationcapacityfollowingagriculturalmanagementhasonlybeendocumenteddecadesafterconversiontoforestorgrassland;completerecoveryappearstotakeacenturyorlonger(Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000).
3.2.3.4 Non‐CO2GHGEmissionsfromBurning
Burningcanbeconductedonlandsinpreparationforcultivationtofacilitateaccessforequipment,removestandingaccumulatedbiomass,andprovideorganicmaterial(ash)forincorporationintosoils.Burningofthebiomasscanbeanimportantsourceofnon‐CO2GHGs(N2O,CH4)aswellasprecursorstoGHGformation(CO,NOx)followingadditionalchemicalreactionsintheatmosphereorsoils.MoreinformationonburningofgrazinglandsvegetationcanbefoundinSection3.3.1.5,andburningoftheremainingbiomasswithclearingofforestcanbefoundinSection6.4.1.9.
3.3 GrazingLandManagement
Rangelandsaredefinedaslandonwhichtheclimaxorpotentialplantcoveriscomposedprincipallyofnativegrasses,grass‐likeplants,forbsorshrubssuitableforgrazingandbrowsing,andintroducedforagespeciesmanagedforgrazingandbrowsing.Conversely,pasturelandsrepresentlandmanagedprimarilyfortheproductionofintroducedforageplantsforlivestockgrazing,withmanagementconsistingoffertilization,weedcontrol,irrigation,reseedingorrenovation,andcontrolofgrazing(USDA,2009).HowgrazinglandsaremanagedinfluencesthepotentialforcarbonsequestrationorGHGemissions.TheparagraphsbelowhighlightsomeofthekeymanagementpracticesandtheirassociatedGHGemissionsandremovalssummarizingthecurrentstateofthescience.
![Page 30: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-30
3.3.1 ManagementActivityInfluencingGHGEmissions
Soilorganiccarbondominatestheterrestrialcarbonpoolingrazinglands.Abovegroundcarbonis<fivepercentofthetotalecosystemcarbonpoolinmostnon‐woodyplantdominatedecosystems,butupto25percentingrassland‐shrublandecosystems.Grazinglandscanbecarbonsinks,withratesofsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationupto0.5MgCha‐1year‐1forrangelands(DernerandSchuman,2007;Liebigetal.,2010)and1.4MgCha‐1year‐1forpastures(Franzluebbers,2005;2010a).Actualratesareoftenlessthantheseapparentmaximalratesofsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationduetomanagement,climate,weather,andotherenvironmentalconstraints.Potentiallyhighratesofsoilorganiccarbonaccumulationarepredictedinnewlyestablishedpasturesandrestorationofdegradedrangelands,whileimpropermanagementanddroughtcanresultinsignificantcarbonreleases.Duetothelargelandarea,themovementofcarbonintoandoutofthesoilreservoiringrazinglandcanbeanimportantcomponentoftheglobalcarboncycle.InadditiontosoilorganicC,alargepoolofsoilinorganiccarbonoccursascarbonatesinsemi‐aridandaridrangelandsoilsthatcanleadtoeithersequestrationorreleaseofCO2(Emmerich,2003).However,thedirectionandmagnitudeofsoilinorganiccarbonstocksarecurrentlypoorlyunderstood(Follettetal.,2001;Liebigetal.,2006;Svejcaretal.,2008).
Twoimportantmanagementfactorsthatcontrolthefateofsoilorganiccarboningrazinglandsarelong‐termchangesinproductionandqualityofabovegroundandbelowgroundbiomassthatcanalterthequantityofnitrogenavailableandtheC‐to‐Nratioofsoilorganicmatter(Pineiroetal.,2010),andgrazing‐inducedeffectsonvegetationcomposition,whichcanbeasimportantasthedirectimpactofgrazing(e.g.,grazingintensity)onsoilorganiccarbonsequestration(DernerandSchuman,2007).Therateofsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationcanbelinearfordecades(Franzluebbersetal.,2012),buteventuallydiminishestoasteady‐statelevelwithnofurtherchangeinthestockfollowingseveraldecadesofamanagementpractice(DernerandSchuman,2007).Additionalpositivechangesinmanagementorinputsareoftenneededtosequesteradditionalsoilorganiccarbon(Conantetal.,2001),butnegativechangesinmanagementcausinglossofsoilstructureandsurfacelittercovercanleadtoerosionandlossofproductivityresultinginadeclineinsoilorganiccarbon(Pineiroetal.,2010).
MethanefluxfromgrazinglandsiscontrolledbythebalanceofentericandmanureemissionsfromruminantanimalsanduptakeofCH4bysoil.(EmissionsandmethodsforestimatingCH4emissionsfromruminantsarediscussedfurtherinSection5.3).InthewesternUnitedStates,grasslandshavegreaterCH4uptakebysoilthandoneighboringcroplands(Liebigetal.,2005),probablyduetogreatersurfacesoilorganicmatterthatpromotesthegrowthofmethanotrophicbacteria.InanassessmentofGHGemissionsfromthreegrazinglandsystemsinNorthDakota,entericemissionsofCH4fromgrazingcattlewerethreetoninetimesgreater(onaCO2equivalentbasis)thanCH4uptakebysoil(Liebigetal.,2010).WithCH4emissionsdirectlytiedtonumberofcattle,fertilizedgrasslandsareoftenanetcarbonsourceduetoenhancedCH4emissionfromcattleandpotentiallygreaterN2Oemissions,whileunfertilizedgrasslandsareoftenanetcarbonsink(Luoetal.,2010;Tunneyetal.,2010).
3.3.1.1 LivestockGrazingPractices
Livestockgrazingpractices(i.e.,stockingrateandgrazingmethod)aresummarizedbelowalongwithdataontheinfluencethesepracticeshaveonGHGemissionsandremovals.
StockingRate:Stockingrateisthenumberofanimalspermanagementunitutilizedoveraspecifiedtimeperiod,e.g.,numberofsteersperacrepermonth.Basedonpublishedstudies,responsesofsoilorganiccarbontostockingrateandgrazingintensityhavebeenvariable,despitegrazingeithercausinganincreaseorhavinglittleeffectonthemorecommonlymeasuredpropertyofsoilbulkdensity(GreenwoodandMcKenzie,2001;Schumanetal.,1999).Innorthernmixed‐grassprairie,
![Page 31: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-31
soilorganiccarbonhasincreasedingrazedcomparedwithungrazedareas,partlyresultingfromincreasingdominanceofshallow‐rooted,grazing‐resistantspecies,suchasbluegrama(Boutelouagracilis),whichincorporatesalargeramountofrootmassintheuppersoilprofilethanthemid‐grassspeciesthatitreplacesduringgrazing(Derneretal.,2006).Furtherresearchisneededtodeterminetheextentofdifferentrootdistributionsontotalcarbonstorageinanentiresoilprofile.Increasingstockingratebeyondanoptimumforachievingmaximumlivestockproductionperunitlandarea(Bement,1969;Dunnetal.,2010)wouldbeexpectedtoresultinalossofsoilorganiccarbonduetoreducedplantvigorandrootdistributioninthesoilprofile.Withsuboptimalstockingrate,vigorofpastureforagesmaydeclineasplantresiduesdevelopathicklitterlayeratthesoilsurface.However,insemi‐aridregions,thehighUVlightintensitymaysignificantlyreducelitteronthesoilsurfacethroughphotochemicaldecompositionprocesses,regardlessofgrazingintensity(Brandtetal.,2010).Vegetationcompositionshiftsthatchangethequantityandqualityofplantmaterialproducedcaninfluencetheamountofcarboninputstosoils.Inmanagedpastures,ithasbeenshownthatsoilorganiccarboncanbeoptimizedwithamoderatestockingratecomparedwithnograzingorheavy,continuousgrazing(Franzluebbers,2010b).Anoptimizedstockingrateforaparticularregion(climaticconditions),vegetationcomposition,andsoiltypeisthoughttomaximizetheamountofsoilorganiccarbonsequestered.
Limitedevidenceshowsthatgrazingatmoderatelevelscanfurtherincreaseenvironmentalbenefitsoverthoseofgrasslandestablishmentalone,inadditiontoprovidinganimportanteconomicreturntoproducers.Ifsoilorganiccarbonweretodeclinewithovergrazing,therewouldalsobeadeclineinanimalproductivityduetolackofforage.Therefore,anegativerelationshipbetweensoilorganiccarbonstorageandanimalproductivityislikelywhengrazingintensityexceedsamoderatelevel.ThisresponseislikelymodifiedundermoderategrazingpressureduetothefactthatgreateranimalproductperheadcanbeachievedwithlowerGHGemissions.Limitingtheeffectofhighstockingrateonsoilorganiccarbonlevelsmaybeachievablewithhighnitrogenfertilizerinputs,anoutcomewithanuncertaincarbonfootprintrelativetoGHGintensity.StockingrateandfertilizernitrogeninputinteractionsneedtobequantifiedtoaccuratelyassesstotalGHGintensity.SomeevidenceinthehumidUnitedStatessuggeststhatovergrazingcanleadtoincreasedsoilerosionandareductioninsoilquality.Literaturefromotherregionshasalsoshownincreasingsoilerosionanddecliningsoilqualitywithexcessivestockingrates.Whileevidenceislacking,anassumptionisthatsoilorganiccarbonfollowsthissamepositiveresponsetomoderategrazingandnegativeresponsetoovergrazing.
EmissionsofN2Ofromgrazinglandsareaffectedbygrazing,butnetfluxcanbeincreasedordecreased,dependingonstockingrate,grazingsystem,andseason(Allardetal.,2007).StockingratehadlittleinfluenceonN2Oemissionsfrommixed‐grassprairieinNorthDakota(Liebigetal.,2010).WhileelevatedN2Oemissionsmaybeexpectedunderincreasedstockingrate,Wolfetal.(2010)suggestedthatgrazingcancounteractpotentialN‐inducedemissionsonrangelandsbyreducingsurfacebiomass,resultinginmoreextremesoiltemperatures,lowersoilmoisture,andcorrespondinginhibitionofmicrobialactivityresponsibleforN2Oemissions.Ifgrazingintensityonpastureswereviewedasafertilizereffectwithincreasinganimalmanuredeposition,thenN2Ofluxfromagrazingeffectdoesnotbehaveinthesamemannerasmanufacturednitrogenfertilizerinputs.Interactionsbetweenstockingrateandnitrogenfertilizerinputshavenotbeenquantified,despitesuchdiversityinmanagementlikelyoccursamongproducers.StockingrateandmanureandfertilizernitrogeninputsareareasrequiringfurtherresearchtobetterunderstandthecomplexsetofcontrollingfactorsinadditiontosoiltextureandenvironmentalconditionsonN2Oemissionsingrazinglands.Onrangelands,theabundanceofN‐fixinglegumesintheplantcommunitybecomesmorecriticalforincreasingSOC,particularlysincefertilizeradditionsandmanurearenotassignificantforreturningnitrogentothesoilcomparedtopasturesystems.ThisisanarearequiringfurtherresearchtobetterunderstandthecontrollingfactorsonN2Oemissions.
![Page 32: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-32
GrazingMethod:Grazingmethodsvarybasedonproducergoalsandthetypeofforageavailable(Scheafferetal.,2009).Twodistinctgrazingmethods,continuousandrotationalgrazing,representtheprevalentmethodsemployedongrazinglandsintheUnitedStatestomanagethelivestock.Continuousgrazingallowsanimalstofreelymoveandhavefullaccesstoagrazingarea,whereasrotationalgrazingismorecontrolled,involvingmovementofanimalsbasedonmonitoringforagecondition,suchasplantheight,betweentwoormorepaddockssubdividedfromalargergrazingarea.Rotationalgrazingterminologyhasbeenconfusedwithtermssuchasholisticgrazing,plannedgrazing,prescribedgrazing,andmanagement‐intensivegrazing,whichcontinuetobeusedwithmultipleandambiguousmeaningsdespiteattemptstostandardizedefinitions(SRM,1998).Termstodefineintentionsofrotationalgrazingsystemsincluderest‐rotation,deferred‐rotation,high‐intensity‐short‐duration,andseason‐longgrazing(Briskeetal.,2008;Briskeetal.,2011).Herewedefinerotationalgrazingasthemovementoflivestockbetweentwoormoresubunitsofgrazinglandsuchthatalternatingperiodsofgrazingandnograzing(‘rest’)occurwithinasinglegrowingseason(HeitschmidtandTaylor,1991).
Rotationalgrazinglimitsplantsfromreachingreproductivestagesinwhichforagequalityrapidlydeclines.Thiscontrastswithcontinuousgrazinginwhichthereismoreselectivegrazingofthehighestqualityforages.Assuch,foragequalitymaybemaintainedatahighlevellongerintothegrowingseason.Therefore,rotationalstockinginthehumidUnitedStatescouldprovidemoreuniformforageconsumptionacrosspasturesandallowsufficientresttoforagespeciesbetweengrazingeventstopromotegreaterproduction.Pastureswithgreaterplantproductionviaanimprovedstockingmethodwouldbeexpectedtohavelowersoilerosionandgreatersoilorganiccarbonstorage.Althoughtheseexpectationsseemintuitive,therearelimiteddatainthescientificliteraturetosupportthem.Twostudieshavesuggestedanincreaseinsoilorganiccarbonwithrotationalgrazingcomparedwithcontinualseason‐longgrazing(Conantetal.,2003;Teagueetal.,2010),andanotherstudyfoundnodifferencebetweensystems(Manleyetal.,1995).Sincerotationalgrazingdataaremostlyavailableforrangelandandfewstudiesconductedonpastures,thereisnotenoughevidencetoevaluatehowrotationalgrazingmightaffectsoilorganiccarboninpastures.Giventhatthepreponderanceofevidencesuggeststhatrotationalgrazingdoesnotinfluencevegetationproductioninrangelands(Briskeetal.,2008),changesinsoilorganiccarbonwithrotationalgrazingwouldbeexpectedonlyifsubstantialvegetationchangeoccurredindependentlyfromstockingrate.Rangelandstypicallyhaveamuchhigherdiversityandmultiplegrowthpatternsofforbs,cool‐seasonandwarm‐seasongrasses,whichwouldresultinasmallerinfluenceofstockingmethodonvegetationphenology(i.e.,keepingforageinavegetativeratherthanareproductivestate)thanwouldoccurinmonocultureorsimplemixturesofforagesinpastures.Muchmoreresearchongrazingmethodisneeded,duetothehighadoptionrateandpromotionofthebenefitsofimprovedgrazingmethodsforsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationbyproducersandagriculturaladvisors(BeetzandRhinehart,2010).
3.3.1.2 ForageOptions
Cool‐andwarm‐seasonforageshavegrowthactivityatdifferenttimesoftheyear,therebyaffectingwhenrootandlittercarboninputsaresuppliedtosoil.Dependingonenvironmentalgrowingconditions(i.e.,relativelyshort,cool,andwetsummerwithlong,coldwinterversuslong,hot,anddrysummerwithmild,wetwinter),theperformanceofcool‐versuswarm‐seasonforageswillvaryacrossregions.InthesoutheasternUnitedStates,perennialcool‐seasonforages(e.g.,tallfescue)haveproducedgreatersoilorganiccarbonthanwarm‐seasonforage(e.g.,bermudagrass)ingrazinglandsystems,despitethemorevigorousgrowinghabitofbermudagrass(Franzluebbersetal.,2000).Thisresultislikelyduetotheopportunitiesofforagesforgrowthandthebalanceofwaterinsoilthatremainsformicrobialdecompositionoforganicmatter.
![Page 33: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-33
Timingofforagegrazingcanaffectplantproductivity,wildlifehabitat,andcompactionofsoil.Eachoftheseeffectscan,inturn,affectsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationandGHGemissions.Thecapacityofsoiltowithstandcompactionforcesofanimaltreading,resultinginsignificantdeformation,destabilization,lossofinfiltrationcapacity,andsoilorganiccarbonsequestration,canbeexceeded—especiallyunderwetconditions(Bilottaetal.,2007).Soilsaturationduringwinterandspringleadtosevereeffectsfromanimaltrampling.InnorthernlatitudesandrangelandsofthewesternUnitedStatessubjecttofreeze‐thawcycles,sandyandloamysoilsarelesslikelytobeaffectedbythenegativeimpactsofcompaction.Intuitively,deferringgrazingtoperiodsoflimitedactiveforagegrowth(e.g.,winterandspring)mightcontributetoincreasedsoilcompaction.However,allowingforagetoaccumulatetofullcanopypriortograzingmightbebeneficialtocontrollingerosionbyprovidingalongerperiodofforageandresiduecover.Grazingofwintercovercropsmayalsobeaneffectivefarm‐diversitystrategy,buttheeffectsonsoilerosioncontrolandsoilconditionneedtobequantified.Wildlifemanagementguidelinesonrangelandsuggestlonger‐term(>oneyear)resttoaccumulatevegetationstructureforcertainbirdsneedinghabitat.Timingofgrazingcouldbeacriticalfactorincontrollingcompaction,susceptibilitytoerosion,andsoilorganiccarbonsequestration,sothesequenceofwhenpasturesaregrazedshouldberotatedamongyearstoensurethatplantcommunitiesarenotalwaysgrazedatthesametimetoensuregreatercommunitysustainability.
Organicmatter‐richsurfacesoilabsorbscompactiveforcesofgrazingmuchlikeasponge,inwhichsoiloftenreboundsinvolumeonceforcesareremoved.However,effectsofwintergrazingofdeferredgrowthmaybedifferentincolderthaninwarmerregions:frozensoilmayavoidcompaction,butnutrientrunoffmaybecomemoreimportant(Clarketal.,2004).InthesouthernUnitedStates,perennialcool‐seasongrassesareoftengrazedduringlatewinterandthroughoutspringduringtypicallywetconditions,butduetoactiveforagegrowth,soilcanalsodryquicklyandtramplingmaynotalwayscausedamage.InGeorgia,soilorganiccarbonwasgreaterunderlong‐termstandsofcool‐seasontallfescue(typicallygrazedinspringandautumn)thanunderwarm‐seasonbermudagrass(typicallygrazedinsummer)(Franzluebbersetal.,2000).
InthesoutheasternUnitedStates,annualcool‐seasonforagesareoftenplantedasacovercropfollowingsummercropsorsod‐seededintoperennialgrasspastures.ThispracticecanenhanceforageproductionandshouldincreasesoilorganicC,althoughlimiteddataareavailabletosupportthisconclusion.Inanintegratedcrop/livestocksysteminthesoutheasternUnitedStates,therewasalimitedeffectofgrazingannualcovercropsonsoilorganicC,eitherinthesummerorwintercomparedwithungrazedcovercrops(FranzluebbersandStuedemann,2009).
3.3.1.3 Irrigation
WaterisalimitingfactorintheabilityofplantstofixcarbonandsubsequentlyproducethecarboninputnecessarytoaccumulatesoilorganicC.ItisalsoafactorlimitingdecompositionofsoilorganicC.Whiletheextentofirrigationingrazinglandsislimited,whereitoccursthereareconsequencesforsoilorganiccarbonstorage.Forexample,someproductivemeadowsinthewesternUnitedStatesareirrigated.Howirrigationaffectssoilorganiccarbonwilldependonthequantity,frequency,andtimingofirrigationevents.Irrigationonlyatpeakplantgrowthstageswilllikelycauseamuchgreaterpositiveimpactonforagecarbonfixationthananegativeimpactonsoilorganiccarbondecomposition.Inthesamemanner,irrigationquantity,frequency,andtimingwilllikelyaffectN2OandCH4emissions,althoughpulsedresponsesoftheseGHGscouldlikelybemuchmoredramatic.Unfortunately,thereareonlylimitedstudiesonthesepotentialimpacts.SeeSection3.2.1.4formoreinformationonirrigationmethods.
Inacomparisonofagriculturalsystemswithsurroundingaridandsemi‐aridnaturalvegetation,Entryetal.(2002)foundthatsoilorganiccarbonwasgreaterinirrigatedagriculturalsystemsdue
![Page 34: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-34
toenhancedproductivity.EmissionofN2Ofromirrigatedsystemsoccursfollowingcloselytimedirrigationandnitrogenfertilizerapplicationsincroplandconditions,andthiswouldbeexpectedundergrazinglandsaswell,buttherearefewdataavailable(Liebigetal.,2006;Liebigetal.,2012).
3.3.1.4 NutrientManagement(SyntheticandOrganic)
Fertilizersareoftenappliedtopastures,duetothehighyieldresponsewithadequateprecipitation,butarelesscommoninwesternrangelandsduetoinconsistentyieldresponseandriskycost‐effectivenesswithlimitedandvariableprecipitation.NitrogenavailabilityinsoildeterminestoalargeextenttheemissionsofN2O.Grazinglandstypicallyhavelowernitrogenavailabilityinsoilthancroplands,andthereforehavelowerN2Oemissions(Liebigetal.,2005).However,applicationoffertilizernitrogentorangelandhasbeenfoundtoconsistentlystimulateN2Oemissions(Flechardetal.,2007).Liebigetal.(2010)observedtwo‐foldgreaterN2Oemissionsfromfertilizedcrestedwheatgrasscomparedwithunfertilizedmixed‐grassprairie.AdditionoffertilizernitrogentopastureinMichiganhadanegligibleeffectonN2Oemissions(AmbusandRobertson,2006),whereasapplicationofpoultrymanureonabermudagrasspastureinArkansasincreasedN2Oemissionsby45percentcomparedwithpasturewithoutmanure;N2Ofluxandsoilnitratedynamicswerepositivelyassociated(Saueretal.,2009).Astrategytoreducesoilnitratebyinterseedingannualryegrassonmanure‐amendedsoildecreasedN2Oemissionsby50percent.Similartocropland,reducingsoilnitratetolowlevelsduringperiodsoflowrootactivityandhighlevelsduringperiodsofhighrootactivitywillgenerallyenhanceplantnitrogenuptakeandreduceN2Oemissions.ApplicationofcompostedgreenwastecouldsequesterC,butthisresearchtopichasnotbeenfullyevaluated.AsignificantincreaseinsoilorganiccarbonhasonlybeendemonstratedatoneoftwositesinCalifornia(Ryalsetal.,2014).Frommodelsimulations,compostapplicationhasbeenshowntoreducetheoverallGHGemissiononCO2equivalentbasis,bysequesteringcarbonandreducingN2Oemissions,whilemanureslurryandinorganicfertilizerapplicationsledtonetGHGemissionsonCO2equivalentbasis(DeLongeetal.,2013).Formoreinformationonmanagementoptionsassociatedwithfertilizationpractices,seeSection3.2.1.1.
3.3.1.5 PrescribedFires
Burninghasthepotentialtoaltersoilorganiccarbonthrougheffectsonphotosynthesis,soil,andcanopyrespiration,andthroughspecieschanges,inadditiontostabilizingorincreasinglivestockgains,improvinghabitatdiversity,andreducingfuelloads(Bouttonetal.,2009;Toombsetal.,2010).Althoughcarbonlossfromburninggrazinglandsisaminorcomponentoftheannualcarbonemissions,burningrangelandswithasignificantwoodyabovegroundplantbiomasscanresultinsubstantialimmediateecosystemcarbonloss(BremerandHam,2010;Rauetal.,2010).However,prescribedburningofgrazinglandscouldalsoaffectlong‐livedcharthataccumulatesinsoil,andthereforewouldinfluencesoilcarbonstocks.Burningalsoleadstonon‐CO2GHGemissions,whichcanbesignificantduetothehigherglobalwarmingpotentialofthesegasescomparedwithCO2(IPCC,2006).Formoreinformationonnon‐CO2GHGemissionsfromburning,seeSection3.2.3.4.
3.3.1.6 ErosionControl
Riparianbufferscanbeasignificantsinkforexcessnutrientsrunningoffneighboringgrazinglands.Thefateofnutrientsisdependentontheflowcharacteristicsandtypeofvegetation.ExcessnitrateinsaturatedsoilofriparianareascanleadtosignificantN2Oemissions—althoughtheseemissionsaretypicallytreatedasindirect,withtheemissionsassociatedwiththefieldorlivestockfacilitythatiscontributingtheexcessnutrients(SeeSection3.2.1.1).TransportofsolublecarbonintoriparianareascouldalsoenhanceCH4emissionsfromsaturatedsoil.
![Page 35: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-35
3.3.1.7 ManagementofDrainedWetlands
DrainageofwetlandorhydricsoilsthatareusedforgrazinghasimplicationsforsoilorganiccarbonandGHGemissions,similartodrainageforcropproduction.Thewaterregimeandplantcommunitiesaresignificantlyalteredandsoilsaremodifiedfromanaerobictoaerobicconditions.Increasingoxygeninsoilwillcauseorganicmattertodecomposemorerapidlythanundersaturatedconditions,resultinginreleaseofCO2(Eagleetal.,2010;FranzluebbersandSteiner,2002;IPCC,2006;Liebigetal.,2012).LargeemissionsofCO2resultfromdrainageofwetlands(Allen,2007;2012),anddrainagecanalsoincreasenitrogenmineralizationandenhanceN2Oemissionsdirectly(IPCC,2006).EmissionsofCH4arereducedconsiderablywithdrainage,butthisimpactisoftennotconsideredinestimationofGHGemissions(IPCC,2006).Alargeproportionofgrasslandwetlandshavebeendirectlydrainedormodifiedtoenhanceagriculturalproduction(DahlandJohnson,1991),andmanyotherwetlandsareindirectlyaffectedbysubsurfacetiledrainsandagriculturalpracticesinsurroundingcatchments.SeeSection3.2.1.6formoreinformationaboutmanagementofdrainedsoils.
3.3.1.8 LimeAmendments
LimeamendmentsareneededwhensoilpHislow(e.g.,pH<5)toenhanceproductivityandsupportbalancednutrientlevelsingrazinglandsoils.Typicallimingmaterialsingrazinglandsarecalciticlimestone(CaCO3),dolomiticlimestone(CaMg(CO3)2),andconfinedlivestockmanure,particularlypoultrylitter,whichhaslimingactivityfromlimeadditivetothefeedration.Whencarbonatelimeisappliedtosoilitdissolvesinsolutionovertime,withthecationandcarbonatedissociating.ThereispotentialforreleasingCO2totheatmospheredependingonwhetherthelimereactswithcarbonicornitricacidinthesoilsolution.Theenhancedplantnutrientofferedbylimingcanhaveanetpositiveeffectonthecarbonbalanceforanextendedperiodoftime.SeeSection3.2.1.7formoreinformationonlimeandtheconsequencesforGHGemissions.
3.3.1.9 WoodyPlantEncroachment
Woodyplantencroachment3leadstocarbonaccumulationinabove‐groundandrootbiomassandmayincreaseoverallecosystemcarbonstorage,butcandegradeagriculturalproductivityofgrazingland(McClaranetal.,2008).Overthepastcenturyinwesternrangelands,soilorganiccarbonhasincreasedinnear‐surfacesoilswithwoodyplantencroachment(Bouttonetal.,2009;Creameretal.,2011;Liaoetal.,2006;Liebigetal.,2012).Removalofwoodyplantsbyfireorothermechanismsdepletestheseshallow,relativelysusceptiblesoilorganiccarbonstoresassociatedwithencroachment(Neffetal.,2009;Rauetal.,2010);butdoesnothaveaneffectonSOCortotalnitrogenstocksatdepthsof>20cm(Daietal.,2006).Regardless,removalofthewoodyplantswillcauseadeclineinabovegroundbiomasscarbonstocks(Rauetal.,2010).
InasummaryofresearchonCH4emissionsfromgrazinglands,Liebigetal.(2012)reportedCH4uptakeundermesquite,butnetCH4productionundergrasslandanddeadmesquitestumps.Methaneuptakeundermesquitewasassociatedwithreducedsoilbulkdensityandincreasedsoilmoisture(McLainandMartens,2006),aswellasgreaternitrogenaccrual/accumulationassociatedintheareaaroundmesquiteplants(10meters)(BouttonandLiao,2010;Liaoetal.,2006;Liuetal.,2010).Methaneuptakeundermesquitewasalsoassociatedwithalteredsoilmicrobialcommunities(Hollisteretal.,2010;LiaoandBoutton,2008),whichcanaffectNOxandN2Orates,whileCH4productionfromgrasslandandwoodydetrituswaslikelycausedbytermiteactivity.The
3Woodyencroachmentwilleventuallyleadtoatransitionfromgrazinglandtoaforest.SeeChapter7:LandUseChangefordefinitionofforestlandtodeterminewhenwoodyencroachmentwillleadtoatransitiontoforestland.
![Page 36: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-36
roleofmesquitetofixN,therebyalteringnitrogendynamics,resultedinN2Oemissionsundermesquitecanopyfour‐foldgreaterthanundergrassesorwoodydetritus(McLainetal.,2008).
3.3.2 Land‐UseChangetoGrazingLands
Land‐useconversiontograzinglandsinfluencesthecarbonstocksandGHGemissionsofaparcel.Priorlanduse,climate,soiltype,andmanagementpracticesarejustafewofthefactorsinfluencingthemagnitudeanddirectionofGHGemissionsandremovalsresultingfromaland‐useconversiontograzinglands.Theparagraphsbelowsummarizethecurrentstateofthescienceontheinfluenceofaland‐useconversiononcarbonstocks,soilN2O,CH4,andnon‐CO2GHGsresultingfrombiomassburning.
3.3.2.1 InfluenceonCarbonStocks
Establishmentofpasturesonpreviouscroplandhelpsreducesoilerosionandimprovessoilquality(Singeretal.,2009).Thereissubstantialevidencethatestablishmentofpasturesleadstosignificantsoilorganiccarbonsequestration.Therateofaccumulationacrossanumberofstudiesaveraged0.84MgCha‐1year‐1(Franzluebbers,2010a).Literatureisinadequatetodeterminewhetherforagecompositionorsoiltypehaveadiscernibleinfluenceonsoilorganiccarbonstock(seeSection3.3.1.2).Thequantityofforageproducedandthequantityofresiduesfromsurfacelitterandrootbiomassarelikelykeydeterminantsofsoilorganiccarbonaccumulation.Thesequantitiescanbeinfluencedbyfactorssuchasforagemixture,climaticconditions,soiltype,inherentsoilfertility,fertilizerapplication,andliming.
3.3.2.2 InfluenceonSoilNitrousOxide
Dependinguponpreviouslanduse,grasslandestablishmentmayormaynotaffectnetN2Oemissionsduringland‐usechange.Ingeneral,emissionsofN2Oarecontrolledbysoilnitrogenavailabilitywithadditionalinfluenceofsoiloxygenandsolublecarbonavailability.Ifthepreviouslandusewasforexample,anutrient‐limitedforest,convertedsubsequentlytohigh‐fertilitypasture,thenN2Oemissionswouldlikelyincrease.Ifthepreviouslandusewasnutrient‐richcroplandconvertedtopasture,thenN2OemissionswouldlikelydeclineduetogreateropportunityforperennialforagespeciestoassimilateavailablesoilnitrogenandthusreduceopportunitiesforsoilnitrogentransformationstoN2O.Thisisanarearequiringfurtherresearchtoobtainquantitativeresponses,however.
3.3.2.3 InfluenceonMethanotrophicActivity
Land‐usechangetograzingland,particularlyfromforestland,mayinvolvefertilizationtoenhanceforageproduction.NitrogenfertilizationcausesareductionofmethanotrophicactivityinsoilsandthereforereducestheuptakeofCH4fromtheatmosphere(AmbusandRobertson,2006).SeeSection3.2.3.3formoreinformationontheimpactofland‐usechangeonmethanotrophicactivity.
3.3.2.4 Non‐CO2GHGEmissionsfromBurning
BiomassburningingrazinglandcanbeanimportantsourceofGHGs(CO2,N2O,CH4)(Aaldeetal.,2006;AndreaeandMerlet,2001;Badarinathetal.,2009;IPCC,2006).Whileconversionofcroplandtograzinglandrarelyinvolvesburning,conversionofforesttograzinglandcaninvolveburningofthewoodand/orslashleftfromlandclearing.TheeffectonGHGemissionsfrombiomassburningisdiscussedfurtherinthecroplandsection(Section3.2.3.4)andintheforestlandsection(Section6.4.1.9).
![Page 37: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-37
3.4 Agroforestry
AgroforestryrepresentsauniquecasewithinGHGaccounting,encompassingbothforestandagriculturalcomponents,alongwithmanycombinationsoftheirrespectivemanagementactivities(Table3‐1andTable3‐2).AgroforestryisdefinedwithintheUnitedStatesasan“intensiveland‐usemanagementthatoptimizesthebenefits(physical,biological,ecological,economic,andsocial)frombiophysicalinteractionscreatedwhentreesand/orshrubsaredeliberatelycombinedwithcropsand/orlivestock”(GoldandGarrett,2009).Anotherwayoflookingatagroforestryisasasetoftree‐based4conservation/productionpracticescombinedintobiggeragriculturaloperations,providingforest‐derivedfunctionsandinteractingwithagriculture‐derivedfunctionsinsupportofagriculturallanduse.Whileprovidingmanyotherservices(seeTable3‐3),agroforestrycancontributetocarbonsequestration,GHGmitigation,andadaptationtoshiftingclimate(CAST,2011;IPCC,2000;Morganetal.,2010;Verchotetal.,2007).
Table3‐3:SixCategoriesofAgroforestryPracticesPracticedintheUnitedStates
Practice Descriptiona Benefitsb
Alleycropping
Treesorshrubsplantedinsetsofsingleormultiplerowswithagronomic,horticulturalcrops,orforagesproducedinthealleysbetweenthesetsofwoodyplantsthatproduceadditionalproducts
Produceannualandhigher‐valuebutlonger‐termcropsfordiversificationofincome
Enhancemicroclimateconditionstoimprovecroporforagequalityandquantity
Reducesurfacewaterrunoffanderosion Improvesoilqualitybyincreasingutilizationandcyclingofnutrients
Altersubsurfacewaterquantityorwatertabledepths
Enhancewildlifeandbeneficialinsecthabitat Decreaseoffsitemovementofnutrientsorchemicals Increasecarbonstorageinplantbiomassandsoils Improveairquality
Forestfarming(alsocalledmulti‐storycropping)
Existingorplantedstandsoftreesorshrubsthataremanagedasanoverstorywithanunderstoryofwoodyand/ornon‐woodyplantsthataregrownforavarietyforproducts
Improvecropdiversitybygrowingmixedbutcompatiblecropshavingdifferentheightsonthesamearea
Improvesoilqualitybyincreasingutilizationandcyclingofnutrientandmaintainingorincreasingsoilorganicmatter
Increasenetcarbonstorageinplantbiomassandsoil
Riparianforestbuffersc(combinesNaturalResourcesConservationServicePracticeStandards:RiparianForestBufferandFilterStrip)
Acombinationoftrees,shrubs,andgrassesestablishedonthebanksofstreams,rivers,wetlands,andlakes
Decreaseoffsitemovementofnutrientsorchemicals Stabilizestreambanks Enhanceaquaticandterrestrialhabitats Provideeconomicdiversificationeitherthroughplantproductionorrecreationalfees
Increasecarbonstorageinplantbiomassandsoils
4Alsoreferredtoastrees‐outside‐forests,theterm“tree”hereincludesbothtreeandshrubs(Bellefontaineetal.,2002).
![Page 38: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-38
Practice Descriptiona Benefitsb
SilvopastureTreescombinedwithpastureandlivestockproduction
Providediversificationofcropsintimeandspace Produceannualandhigher‐valuebutlonger‐termcrops
Decreaseoffsitemovementofnutrientsorchemicals
Windbreaks(alsoreferredtoasshelterbelts)
Linearplantingsoftreesandshrubstoformbarrierstoreducewindspeed(maybespecificallyreferredtoascroporfieldwindbreak,livestockwindbreak,livingsnowfence,orfarmsteadwindbreak,dependingontheprimaryuse)
Controlwinderosion Protectwind‐sensitivecrops Enhancecropyields Reduceanimalstressandmortality Serveasabarriertodust,odor,andpesticidedrift Conserveenergy Providesnowmanagementbenefitstokeeproadsopenorharvestmoisture
Specialapplications
Useofagroforestrytechnologiestohelpsolvespecialconcerns,suchasdisposalofanimalwastesorfilteringirrigationtailwater,whileproducingashort‐orlong‐rotationwoodycrop
Treatmunicipalandagriculturalwastes Treatstormwater Useincenterpivotcornerplantings Producebiofeedstock Reduceimpactsofflooding Decreaseoffsitemovementofnutrientsorchemicals
Source:USDANaturalResourcesConservationService(2012).aDescriptionsfollowUSDANaturalResourcesConservationServiceConservationPracticesStandards.bAllagroforestryplantingsaddincreaseddiversitywithintheagriculturallandscape.Assuch,theywillimprovewildlifehabitatandgenerallyaredesignedormanagedwiththisasasecondarybenefit.cRiparianforestbufferreferstotheplantedpractice.Thiscategorydoesnotincludenaturallyestablishedriparianforests.
IntheUnitedStates,fivemaincategoriesofagroforestrypracticesarerecognized:alleycropping,forestfarming,riparianforestbuffers,silvopasture,andwindbreaks.Thereisanemergingsixthcategoryofspecialapplicationsoradaptationsofthesepractices(Table3‐3).Thesepracticesaretreatedwithinthecroplandandgrazinglandsystemsectionwiththeexceptionofforestfarming.Forestfarming(alsoreferredtoasmulti‐storycroppingwithinUSDANaturalResourcesConservationServicePracticeStandards)involvesthemanipulationofexistingforestcanopycoverinordertoproducehigh‐valuenon‐timber(i.e.,food,floral,medicinal,andcraft)productsintheunderstory,thusmaintaininglanduseasforest.Assuch,GHGaccountinginforestfarmingpracticeswillneedtobetreatedwithinthemethodsandapproachespresentedinSection6.2andSection6.4.
Themanyservicesderivedfromagroforestrypracticescanextendwellbeyondthesmallparceloramountoflandtheyphysicallyoccupywithintheagriculturallandscape(Bellefontaineetal.,2002;Garrett,2009).Theuseofagroforestrytechnologiesareimportantcomponentsattherural/communityinterface,aswellaswithinurbansettingstoaddressemergingneedssuchasstormwatertreatment,recreationorgreenspace,andfeedstockproduction(Schoenebergeretal.,2001).Althoughagroforestryiscategorizedintothesepractices,eachagroforestryplanting,evenwithinapractice,potentiallyrepresentsauniquecaseofspeciesselection,arrangement,placementwithinotherpracticesandthelargerlandscape,anduseofmanagementactivities,dependingonlandownerobjectives.Agroforestryplantingsarethereforemoreofa“designerlandscapefeature”thanastandardizedandeasilydescribedpractice(Mizeetal.,2008)withinGHGaccountingactivities.
Silvopastureprovidesagoodillustrationofthiscomplexityinagroforestrysystems.Silvopastureisthedeliberatecombinationofthreecomponents—trees,forage,andlivestock—alongwiththerangeoftheirrespectivemanagementactivities.Studiesdemonstrateahighercarbonsequestrationpotentialinsilvopasturecomparedwithforestorpasturealone(Haileetal.,2010;Nairetal.,2007;
![Page 39: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/39.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-39
SharrowandIsmail,2004).Muchofthisnewcarbonisinthewoodybiomass,butsoilcarbonalsohasthepotentialtoincreaseasaconsequenceofcarboninputsfromthetrees,whichovertimeextendfurtherintotheforagecomponent(Peichletal.,2006),aswellasmanagementoftheforageandofthelivestock(seeFranzluebbersandStuedemann,2009;Karkietal.,2009).Managementactivitieswithinasilvopasturemayincludefertilization,liming,cultivation,andharvestingoftheforagecrop(insomeyears);periodicharvestingofpineneedlesforpinestraw;incorporationofprunedwoodymaterialintotheforagecomponent;anddifferentgrazingintensitiesandrotations.Thefrequencyandintensityofmanagementactivitiesandinputsfromallthreecomponentscanvarysignificantlyfromyeartoyear,whichmakesaccountingforthesequesteredcarboninasilvopastureoperationchallenging.
RatesandamountsofGHGemissionswithineachagroforestryplantingwillvarydependingonpriorlandmanagementandcurrentconditions(i.e.,site,climate),aswellasbystanddevelopment.Theseratesandamountswillalsobedependentonlandowners’decisionsthatdetermineplantingdesign,aswellasmanagementactivities—agricultural,forestry,andgrazing—usedoverthelifetimeofanagroforestrysystem(Table3‐4).
Table3‐4:ManagementActivities5andOtherFactorsWithinAgroforestryPracticesThatMayAlterCarbonSequestrationandGHGEmissionAmounts
Practice ManagementActivities
Windbreaks
Establishmentdisturbancetosoilduringsitepreparation Depositionofwind‐andwater‐transportedsediments,nutrients,andotheragriculturalchemicalsintotheplanting Windbreakrenovation(removalofdeadanddyingtreesovertime)
Riparianforestbuffers
Establishmentdisturbancetosoilduringsitepreparation Depositionofwind‐andwater‐transportedsediments,nutrients,andotheragriculturalchemicalsintotheplanting HarvestingofherbaceousmaterialsplantedinZone3(zoneclosesttocrop/grazingsystem)andofwoodymaterialsplantedinZone2(middlezone)
Alleycropping
Establishmentdisturbancetosoilduringsitepreparation Weedcontrol(mechanicalorchemical) Pruning,thinning,andharvestingofwoodymaterial(amountandfrequencyvarygreatlydependingonshort‐andlong‐termobjectiveofpractice) Fertilizationforalleycropandoccasionallyneededfortreesinrows Tillageinalleys(frequencyandintensity) Cropspeciesusedinalleyproduction Complexharvestingschedulesstratifiedinspaceandtime
Silvopasture
Establishmentdisturbancetosoilduringsitepreparation Weedcontrol(mechanicalorchemical) Pruning,thinning,andharvestingofwoodymaterial(amountandfrequencyvarygreatlydependingonshort‐andlong‐termobjectiveofpractice) Fertilizationofforagecomponent Tillageinforagecomponent(frequencyandintensity) Cropspeciesusedinforagecomponent Grazingmanagement(timing,intensity,frequency) Complexharvestingschedulesstratifiedinspaceandtime
3.4.1 CarbonStocks
Agroforestry’spotentialforsequesteringlargeamountsofcarbonperunitareaiswellrecognized(Dixonetal.,1994;KumarandNair,2011;Nairetal.,2010),withsequestrationratesbeinggreater
5ForestFarmingisnotincludedintheseconsiderations.
![Page 40: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/40.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-40
thanmanyoftheotheragriculturaloptions(IPCC,2000).Carbonissequestereddirectlyintothewoodybiomassandsoil.Indirectly,agroforestrypracticescanaltercarboncyclingbyenhancingcropandforageproduction(upto15H—heightoftrees—distancefromthewindbreak)andtrappingwind‐blownandrunofferosion(Brandleetal.,2009).Lackofdatalimitsaccountingoftheseothercarbonfluxesimpactedbytheadditionoftreesandisbeyondthescopeofthiseffort.
WoodyBiomass:Themajorityofnewcarboncontributedtoasitebyagroforestrywillbefromtheproductionofwoodybiomass,withthelargercontributionbeingfromtheabovegroundwoodybiomass,asgenerallyobservedinforestestablishmentplantings(NuiandDuiker,2006).Themoreopenenvironmentcreatedinagroforestryplantingsresultsinthetreeshavingdifferentgrowthformsthanencounteredunderforestconditions—e.g.,greaterbranchproduction(Zhou,1999)andspecificgravity(Zhouetal.,2011)—whichwillneedtobetakenintoaccountwhenestimatingtheabovegroundwoodybiomass.
Thebelowgroundbiomasspoolinagroforestryplantingswillalsobeasignificantportionofnewcarbonaddedtothesite.However,measuring,estimating,and/orverifyingthiscomponentisverydifficultandexpensive.Thecontributionsfromrootbiomasscanbeestimatedusingvariousapproachesthatrelyonknowingtheabovegroundportion.
ForestProductsandOtherRemovedMaterials:Windbreaksandriparianforestbuffersareplantedforpurposesthatrequirethetreestobeinplaceforthetargetedfunction(s)(i.e.,alterationofmicroclimate;interceptionofsediments,nutrients,andchemicals).Windbreakrenovation(removalofdeadtreesandreplanting)isrecommendedtomaintainmicroclimatebenefits(Brandleetal.,2009).Periodicharvestingofplantmaterialsintheherbaceouszone(adjacenttocropfield)andmiddlewoodyzoneisalsorecommendedinriparianforestbufferstomaintainhigherratesofnutrientuptakeandthereforewaterqualityservices(Dosskeyetal.,2010).Moreinnovativeanddiversifiedplantingdesignsthatincorporatebioenergyfeedstocksarebeingconsideredforbothofthesepractices,whichwouldincreaselevelsofharvestingwithinthesesystems.Inthecaseofriparianforestbuffers,harvestingoftheherbaceousandwoodymiddlezoneforbioenergyfeedstockswouldservetoreplenishahighernutrientuptakerateandthuswaterqualityservices,aswellasprovideanadditionalincomestream(Schoenebergeretal.,2008).Manyalleycroppingandsilvopasturesystemsaremanagedforhigh‐valueveneerandsaw‐timber.Thesetrees,alongwithsomespecialapplicationsofagroforestrytechnologies,arealsobeinginvestigatedfortheiruseinproducingbioenergyfeedstocks.Fortheseplantings,removalorharvestingofabovegroundwoodymaterialcanoccurasearlyasthreeyearsto75yearsormore,dependingontheproduct.Harvestedmaterialscanalsoincludestem‐pruning,generallyupto15feetoverseveralyearstoattainacleanbole,toperiodicthinninginordertomaintainacanopycoverthatisoptimalforthegrowthofthetreeaswellasthecropbeinggrowninthealleys.Thematerialmaybeleftonsitetocreatewildlifehabitat,choppedandincorporatedintothesoil,ortakenoff‐siteandburned.
Soil:StudieshavedocumentedthatU.S.agroforestrypracticesgenerallyhavegreatersoilcarbonstocks(underthewholepractice,whichmayvaryfromjustunderawindbreaktounderthewholetree/cropsystem,suchasalleycropping)whencomparedwiththatinconventionalagriculturalandgrazingpractices(Nairetal.,2010).However,estimatingchangeorfluxinsoilcarbonstocksinagroforestryplantingsischallengingduetoitsinherentlyhighspatialandtemporalvariability.Forinstance,SharrowandIsmail(2004)foundvariabilityofsoilcarbontobetwotothreetimesgreaterinanon‐grazedsilvopasturesystemthanintheadjacentforestorpasturealone.
Soilcarboncanincreaseinagroforestrysystemsduetoaddedcarboninputsfromthetrees,theeliminationofcarbonlossduetoannualcroppingactivities(i.e.,conservationtillage),andpotentiallytheadditionofcarbonthroughotheragriculturalmanagementactivities,suchasincorporationofdifferentcrops,covercrops,residuemanagement,andfertilizationregimes.
![Page 41: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/41.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-41
ChangesinsoilcarbonstockshavebeenestimatedinanumberofforestestablishmentplotsfromtheMidwest,andwerefoundtovaryfrom‐0.07to0.58MgCha‐1year‐1and‐0.85to0.56MgCha‐1year‐1indeciduousandconiferousplots,respectively.Pauletal.(2003)attributedthevariationtotheimpactandvariablerecoveryfromtreeplanting,butalsomentionedthepossibilitythatvariationmaybeduetotheuseofpresent‐daycroppingfieldsasthecarbonbaselineforcomparison.Manyagroforestrystudiesarereportingcomparableratesofsoilsequestration(seeNairetal.,2010).Resultsfromtemperateagroforestrystudiesindicate,especiallyforalleysreceivinghighleveloforganicmatterinputfromthetrees,thatitmaybeseveralyearsbeforesignificantlymeasurablecarbondifferencesaredetectablebetweentheagroforestryplantingandtraditionalsolecroppingsystem(Peichletal.,2006;Udawattaetal.,2009).Theamountanddurationofsoilorganicmatteraccumulationinagriculturalsoilswithagroforestrymanagementwilldependonthedegreetowhichpriorsoilcarbonstocksaredepleted.Inaddition,itwilldependonthesoilsingeneral,climate,placementwithinalandscape,typeofvegetation,andmostimportantly,bytheadditionalmanagementactivitiesemployedinthemixedtree/agriculturalsystem(Table3‐4).
NotethatcarbonincreasesfromnitrogeninputsmaybeoffsetthroughenhancedN2Oemissions,dependingonanumberoffactors(seeSection6.4.1.6).Manyagroforestryplantings,suchaswindbreaksandriparianforestbuffers,arepurposefullydesignedtointerceptsoilinwinderosionandsurfacerunoff,whichisanotheradditionofcarbontothispool(Saueretal.,2007).DepositionofsedimentwillinfluencecyclingofbothelementsandthereforenetGHGvalues(McCartyandRitchie,2002;SudmeyerandScott,2002).Wecurrentlylacktheunderstandinganddataneededforadequatelymodelingandthereforepredictingtheseintra‐andinter‐soilcarbontransfersfromerosionanddeposition.
3.4.2 NitrousOxide
DataondirectN2Oemissionsinagroforestryplantingsaresparse.Thefewstudiesto‐datefoundreducedN2Oemissionsinafforestedplotsthatwereolderthanfiveyears(Allenetal.,2009),underwindbreaks(RyskowskiandKedziora,2007)andriparianforestbuffers(Kim,2008).AlleycroppingsystemsreducedN2Oemissionsby0.7kgha‐1year‐1comparedwiththeannualcroppingsystemswithnotreecover(ThevathasanandGordon,2004).Thesestudiessuggestthetreescanactasa“nitrogen‐safetynet”inthesystem,takingupthe“extra”nitrogenthatmightotherwiseresultinN2Oemissions.Inaddition,reducednitrogenleachinghasbeendocumentedwithinagroforestryplantingscomparedwiththeannualcroppingsystemwithnotreecover(Allenetal.,2004;Lopez‐Diazetal.,2011;Nairetal.,2007).ThereducedleachingimpliesthatlessnitrogenisavailableforindirectsoilN2Oemissions,whichcouldbebeneficialinthoseagroforestryplantingsrequiringfertilization(i.e.,alleycroppingandsilvopasturesystems)orthatreceivelargeinputsofnitrogenthroughsurfaceandsubsurfacerunoff(i.e.,riparianforestbuffers).Asmanyagroforestryplantingsarepurposefullydesignedandplantedtoprovidetighternutrientcyclingcapabilitiesasameanstoprotectwaterquality(Olsonetal.,2000),thecapabilityandcapacityofthesesystemstoreduceN2OemissionsinagriculturalsystemswarrantsfurtherstudytodeterminewhetherandhowitshouldbeaccountedforinGHGaccountingmethods.
3.4.3 Methane
VerylittleresearchhasbeendonetodeterminewhethertheestablishmentofagroforestryplantingscanleadtoanychangeinCH4sinksorsourcesinsoilsduetochangesinmethanotrophyormethanogenesis,respectively.Kimetal.(2010)didnotfindanyevidenceinestablishedriparianforestbuffersinIowa(sevento17yearsold)thatCH4fluxdifferedfromneighboringcropfields.RiparianforestbufferscouldpotentiallyserveasaCH4emittergiventheperiodicfloodingthatmayoccurwithintheseplantings.However,riparianforestbuffersestablishedonagriculturallandsmay
![Page 42: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/42.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-42
notbesignificantemittersofCH4becausethehydrologicalconnectionswithintheselandscapeshavebeendecoupled.Thisindicatesuseofriparianforest(naturallyoccurring)deriveddatamayresultinoverestimatingsink/sourcecapacityofriparianforestbuffers.Ingeneral,thereisinsufficientdatatomodelandpredictmethanefluxesinagroforestryatthistime.
3.4.4 ManagementInteractions
Agroforestrypracticescanindirectlyaltercarboncyclingbyenhancingcropandforageproductionandtrappingwindblownandsurfacerunoffsediments.ExaminingthecarbonpotentialofwindbreaksintheGreatPlains,Brandleetal.(1992)estimatedindirectcarbonbenefitscouldpotentiallybedoubletheamountofthecarbonsequesteredinthewood.Althoughprojectstoexamineindirectcarbonbenefitsfromseveraloftheagroforestrypracticesareongoing,wecurrentlylacktheabilitytomodelorpredicttheseimpacts.
3.5 EstimationMethods
ThissectionprovidesmethodsforestimatingGHGemissionsfromcroplandandgrazinglandsystemsonanentity’sland.Themethodsareappliedforbothlandremainingincroplandorgrazinglands,aswellasland‐usechangetocroplandorgrazinglands.Themethodsprovidedareforestimatingtheemissionlevelsforagivenyearonaparcelofland.Aparcelisafieldintheentity’soperationwithuniformmanagement.Ifmanagementvariesacrossthefield,thenthefieldshouldbesubdividedintoseparateparcelsforestimatingtheemissions.
Trendsacrossyearsorcomparisonstobaselinescanbemadeusingtheannualemissionestimates.Guidanceisnotgivenhereonhowtodevelopbaselinesorsubsequenttrendsforemissionestimation.Thelevelofemissionsforcarbonstocksisbasedonestimatingthechangeinstockfromthebeginningandendoftheyear,whilethelevelofemissionsforN2OandCH4arebasedonestimatingthetotalannualemissions.Methodsarealsoprovidedforestimatingtotalemissionsofprecursorgasesemittedduringbiomassburning,aswellasnitrogencompoundsthatarevolatilizedorsubjecttoleachingandrunofffromanentity’scroplandorgrazinglandthatarelaterconvertedintoGHGs.
Themethodsrangeincomplexityforthedifferentemissionsourcecategoriesaccordingtothestateofthescienceandpriormethoddevelopment.Simplemethodsareselectedforseveraloftheemissionorcarbonstockchangesourcecategories;becausethemorecomplexmethodsarenotfullydevelopedforoperationalaccountingofemissionsorthesimplemethodsprovideareasonablyaccurateandpreciseresult.Althoughsimplicitymaybepreferredfortransparencyinestimation,someofthemethodsusemorecomplexapproaches,suchasprocess‐basedsimulationmodels,becausethesemethodsgreatlyimprovetheaccuracyand/orprecisionoftheresult.
![Page 43: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/43.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-43
3.5.1 BiomassCarbonStockChanges
3.5.1.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
BothIPCC(2006)andtheU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(2011)considerherbaceousbiomasscarbonstockstobeephemeral,andrecognizethattherearenonetemissionstotheatmospherefollowingcropgrowthandsenescenceduringoneannualcropcycle(Westetal.,2011).However,withrespecttochangesinlanduse(e.g.,foresttocropland),theIPCC(Lascoetal.,2006)recommendsthatcroplandbiomassbecountedintheyearthatlandconversionoccurs,andthesameassumptionalsoappliesforgrassland(Verchotetal.,2006).AccordingtotheIPCC,accountingfortheherbaceousbiomasscarbonstockduringchangesinlanduseisnecessarytoaccountfortheinfluenceofherbaceousplantsonCO2uptakefromtheatmosphereandstorageintheterrestrialbiosphere.However,thismethoddoesnotrecognizechangesinherbaceousbiomassthatoccurwithchangesincroprotations,nordoesitrecognizelong‐termincreasesinannualcropyields.ThemethodisaconsideredaTier2methodasdefinedbytheIPCCbecauseitincorporatesfactorsthatarebasedonU.S.specificdata.
Agroforestry,alongwithotherwoodyvegetationincroplands,suchasorchardsandvineyards,sequestersignificantamountsofnewcarbonwithinlong‐livedbiomassovertimewithtreegrowth.MethodsforestimatingtheabovegroundwoodyandwholetreebiomassfortreesgrowingunderforestconditionsaredescribedintheForestrySectionofthisreport.However,thesemethods,developedfromforest‐derived(i.e.,greatercanopyclosure)conditions,donotaccuratelyreflectconditionsencounteredinagroforestryorwoodycrops.Treesgrowingunderwindbreakandotherlinear‐typeplantingshavebeendocumentedtodifferfromforest‐growntreesintermsofarchitectureandproperties,suchascrown:trunkallocation(Zhou,1999),specificgravity(Zhouetal.,2011),andtaper(Zhouetal.,inreview).Moreover,theForestInventoryandAnalysisprogramoftheUSDAForestServiceandNationalResourceInventoryoftheUSDANaturalResourcesConservationServicedonotcollectagroforestryorwoodycropdatathroughtheirsurveys(Perryetal.,2005).Therefore,aTier3methodusingprocess‐basedmodelsisaviablealternativeforestimatingthecarbonstockchangesassociatedwithagroforestryandwoodycropswithoutdirectmeasurementthroughasurvey.Specifically,theDAYCENTmodelhasbeenparameterizedtosimulatetreegrowthandhasbeenadoptedforestimatingwoodybiomasscarbonforagroforestryandwoodycrops.
MethodforEstimatingBiomassCarbonStockChanges
AmodifiedversionofthemethodologydevelopedbytheIPCC(Lascoetal.,2006;Verchotetal.,2006)hasbeenadoptedforentity‐scaleestimationofherbaceousandwoodybiomassstockchangesassociatedwithlanduse.
TheDAYCENTprocess‐basedsimulationmodelorthetraditionalforestinventoryapproachesareusedtoestimatecarbonforabovegroundbiomassforagroforestry.
U.S.specificdefaultvalues(Westetal.,2010)areusedforestimatingbiomasscarbonforannualcropsandgrazinglands.TheIPCCdefaultisusedforestimatingthecarbonfractionvalue.YieldinunitsofdrymattercanbeestimatedbytheentityoraveragevaluesfromUSDA‐NationalAgriculturalStatisticsServicestatisticscanbeused.
Thismethodwaschosenbecauseitcapturestheinfluenceofland‐usechangeoncroporforagespeciesonbiomasscarbonstocksbyusingU.S.specificdefaultvalueswhereentityspecificactivitydataarenotavailableandaprocess‐basedsimulationmodelforagroforestrysystems.
![Page 44: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/44.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-44
3.5.1.2 DescriptionofMethod
AmodifiedversionofthemethodologydevelopedbytheIPCC(Lascoetal.,2006;Verchotetal.,2006)hasbeenadoptedforentity‐scalereportingintheUnitedStatesofherbaceousandwoodybiomassstockchangesassociatedwithlandusechange.Themethodconsistsofestimatingthemeanannualbiomassstockforacroplandorgrazinglandsfollowingalandusechange,whichcanbeaveragedacrossyearsforacroporrotation.Thismethodonlyaddressesachangeintheherbaceousbiomasscarbonstocksintheyearfollowingaland‐usechange,consistentwiththeIPCCmethods(Lascoetal.,2006;Verchotetal.,2006).Incontrast,carbonstockchangeinwoodybiomassisestimatedeveryyear.
UseEquation3‐1toestimatethetotalbiomasscarbonstockchangeforalandparceloverayear:
HerbaceousBiomass:Estimatethemeanannualherbaceousbiomassstockinalandparcelforcroplandorgrazinglandfollowingalandusechangewiththefollowingequation:
Themeanannualbiomassstockisintendedtorepresentthetimeperiodfollowingharvestwherenocropexistsandbothlitterandrootsaredecomposingquickly(Gilletal.,2002),andthetimeperiodduringthegrowingseasonwherebiomasscontinuestogrowuntilitreachespeakannualbiomass.Theaverageofzerobiomassandpeakbiomass(e.g.,peakbiomassdividedbytwo)isconsideredrepresentativeofthemeanannualcarbonstock(i.e.,Yf=0.5).
Equation3‐3isusedtoestimatethepeakabovegroundbiomassinalandparcelfromharvestyielddataincroplandsorpeakforageyieldsingrazinglands.
Equation3‐1:TotalBiomassCarbon StockChange
ΔCBiomass=(Ht+Wt)–(Ht‐1+Wt‐1)
Where:
ΔCBiomass=Totalchangeinbiomasscarbonstock(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
H =Meanannualherbaceousbiomass(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
W =Meanannualwoodybiomass(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
t =Currentyearstocks
t‐1 =Previousyear’sstocks
Equation3‐2:MeanAnnualHerbaceousBiomassCarbon Stock
H=[Hpeak+(Hpeak×R:S)]×A×CO2MW/Yf
Where:
H =Meanannualherbaceousbiomasscarbonstock(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
Hpeak =Annualpeakabovegroundbiomass(metrictonsCha‐1year‐1)
R:S =Root‐shootratio(unitless)
A =Areaoflandparcel(ha)
CO2MW=RatioofmolecularweightofCO2tocarbon=44/12(metrictonsCO2(metrictonsC)‐1)
Yf =Approximatefractionofcalendaryearrepresentingthegrowingseason(unitless)
![Page 45: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/45.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-45
Thismethodcapturestheinfluenceofland‐usechangeandchangesincroporforagespeciesonbiomasscarbonstocks.Therefore,cropharvestorpeakforageyieldsshouldbeaveragedacrossyearsaslongasthesameforagespecies,croporrotationofcropsaregrown.Theharvestindexissettooneforgrazinglands.
Peakforageestimatesforgrazinglandscanbeestimatedusingthebiomassclippingmethod.6Thismethodisdestructivewiththeremovalofforagesamplesfromthefield.Non‐destructivemethodscanalsobeusedincludingthecomparativeyieldmethodforrangelands7,ortherobelpolemethodonrangelandsorpastures(Harmoneyetal.,1997;Vermeireetal.,2002).Anysamplingthatisdone,whetherdestructiveornon‐destructive,shouldoccuratlocationsthatarerepresentativeofthelandparcel.Ifsamplingtheforageisnotfeasible,defaultforageproductionvaluesareprovidedbytheNaturalResourcesConservationServiceinEcologicalSiteDescriptions(ESDs).8AfteridentifyingtheappropriateESD,theentitywouldselecttheplantcommunitythatisrepresentativeoftheparcel.ThesevaluesrepresenttotalproductionforthesitesoYfinEquation3‐2wouldbesetto1iftheabovegroundforageproductionisobtainedfromanESD.
WoodyBiomass:Thelargestamountofcarboncapturedbyagroforestrysystemsisinwoodybiomass,withthemajorityoccurringintheabovegroundbiomass.Woodycropsalsogaincarbonastheygrow.Thismethodalsoaddressescarbonremovalsthroughharvestorothereventsthatremovetreebiomass.
Themethodstoestimatebiomasscarboninalandparcelforthemore‐opengrowthofagroforestrysystemsandwoodycrops(WtandWt‐1inEquation3‐1)arebasedonDAYCENTmodelsimulationsandgrowthfunctionsforagroforestry.AgroforestrypracticesarebasedontheNaturalResourcesConservationServiceagroforestrypracticestandards,whichareprovidedinapicklist.Forwoodycrops,theDAYCENTmodelsimulatestheinfluenceofcommonmanagementpracticesonbiomassstocks,includingirrigation,fertilization,organicmatteramendments,groundcovermanagement,
6Seesection15,“StandingBiomass”http://www.nrisurvey.org/nrcs/Grazingland/2011/instructions/instruction.htm7Seesection13,“DryWeightRank”http://www.nrisurvey.org/nrcs/Grazingland/2011/instructions/instruction.htm8SeeESDshttps://esis.sc.egov.usda.gov/
Equation3‐3:AbovegroundHerbaceousBiomassCarbonStock
Hpeak=(Ydm/HI)×C
Where:
Hpeak=Annualpeakabovegroundherbaceousbiomasscarbonstock (metrictonsCha‐1year‐1)
Ydm =Cropharvestorforageyield,correctedfordrymattercontent (metrictonsbiomassha‐1year‐1)
=YxDM
Y =Cropharvestorforageyield(metrictonsbiomassha‐1year‐1)
DM =Drymattercontentofharvestedcropbiomassorforage(dimensionless)
HI =HarvestIndex(dimensionless)
C =Carbonfractionofabovegroundbiomass(dimensionless)
![Page 46: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/46.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-46
pruningofbranches,thinningofyoungfruit,andharvestandremovalofmaturefruit.Giventhepractice,DAYCENTsimulateschangesinwoodybiomasscarbonstocksforthereportingperiod.
Foragroforestrysystemswheretheentityhasmeasuredtreeparameters,anempiricalmodelisprovidedtomorepreciselyestimatewoodybiomasscarbongrowthincrementfortheyear(MerwinandTownsend,2007;Merwinetal.,2009).TheempiricalmodelusesanindividualtreegrowthequationsbasedonLessard(2000)andLessardetal.(2001).Carbonpoolsarethenderivedfromdiameter‐basedallometricequationsthatpredicttotalabovegroundbiomasscomponentsfor10broadspeciesgroupsintheUnitedStates.(Jenkinsetal.,2003;2004).BothpublishedandunpublisheddatafortheU.S.ForestServiceForestInventoryandAnalysisprogramwereusedtodevelopthegrowthincrementmodel.
Inaddition,harvestedwoodyproductsassociatedwithagroforestryareestimatedusingtheapproachesdescribedintheForestryChapter(Section6.5).Woodyproductsmaybeharvestedfromsilvopasture,alleycropping,andotheragroforestrypractices,providingavarietyofproductssuchasveneer,sawtimber,andbioenergyfeedstocks.
3.5.1.3 ActivityData
Activityandrelateddataneededtoestimatebiomasscarbonforannualcropsandgrazinglands(asapplicable)include:
Croptype,croplandarea,andharvestindices; Typeofforage,grazingarea,andpeakforageyielddata; Totalabovegroundyieldofcroporpeakforageyieldforgrazinglands(metrictonsbiomass
perha); Root:shootratios; Carbonfractions;and Drymattercontentofforageandharvestedcropbiomasstoestimatedrymattercontent.
Iftheentitydoesnotprovidevalues,defaultvaluesformoisturecontent,residue‐yieldratios,androot:shootratiosareprovidedinTable3‐5.Ageneraldefaultvalueforcropcarbonfractionis0.45.Insomeyears,theentitymaynotharvestthecropduetodrought,pestoutbreaksorotherreasonsforcropfailure.Inthosecases,theentityshouldprovidetheaverageyieldthattheyhaveharvestedinthepast,andanapproximatepercentageofaveragecropgrowththatoccurredintheyear.Theyieldisestimatedbasedonmultiplyingtheaveragecropyieldbythepercentageofcropgrowthobtainedpriortocroploss.Peakforageyieldswillvaryfromyeartoyear,butcanbebasedonafive‐yearaverage.
Table3‐5:RepresentativeDryMatterContentofHarvestedCropBiomass,HarvestIndex,andRoot:ShootRatiosforVariousCrops.a
CropDryMatterContent
HarvestIndexRoot:ShootRatio
FoodcropsBarley 0.865(3.8%) 0.46(18.7%) 0.11(90.7%)Beans 0.84(3.3%) 0.46(18.7%) 0.08(89.7%)Corngrain 0.86(1.9%) 0.53(15.0%) 0.18(97.3%)Cornsilage 0.74(1.9%) 0.95(3.3%) 0.18(97.1%)Cotton 0.92(1.4%) 0.40(20.0%) 0.17(44.0%)Millet 0.90(1.9%) 0.46(17.6%) 0.25(91.1%)Oats 0.865(1.9%) 0.52(18.7%) 0.40(90.9%)Peanuts 0.91(1.9%) 0.40(16.6%) 0.07(12.4%)Potatoes 0.20(9.3%) 0.50(20.0%) 0.07(44.1%)
![Page 47: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/47.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-47
CropDryMatterContent
HarvestIndexRoot:ShootRatio
Rice 0.91(1.6%) 0.42(28.1%) 0.22(13.2%)Rye 0.90(1.9%) 0.50(18.7%) 0.14(90.1%)Sorghumgrain 0.86(1.9%) 0.44(14.8%) 0.18(97.2%)Sorghumsilage 0.74(1.9%) 0.95(3.3%) 0.18(97.2%)Soybean 0.875(1.7%) 0.42(16.7%) 0.19(89.8%)Sugarbeets 0.15(12.4%) 0.40(24.1%) 0.43(43.9%)Sugarcane 0.258(11.6%) 0.75(6.4%) 0.18(37.4%)Sunflower 0.91(1.9%) 0.27(11.1%) 0.06(44.0%)Tobacco 0.80(1.9%) 0.60(3.3%) 0.80(44.0%)Wheat 0.865(3.8%) 0.39(17.7%) 0.20(86.2%)
ForageandFoddercrops
Alfalfahay 0.87(1.8%) 0.95(3.3%) 0.87(21.8%)Non‐legumehay 0.87(1.8%) 0.95(3.3%) 0.87(21.8%)Nitrogen‐fixingforages 0.35(3.3%) 0.95(3.3%) 1.1(21.2%)
Non‐nitrogen‐fixingforages 0.35(3.3%) 0.95(3.3%) 1.5(21.2%)
Perennialgrasses 0.35(3.3%) 0.95(3.3%) 1.5(21.2%)Grass‐clovermixtures 0.35(3.3%) 0.95(3.3%) 1.5(21.2%)
Source:RevisedfromWestetal.(2010).aUncertaintyisexpressedonapercentagebasisashalfofthe95%confidenceinterval.
Activitydataforestimatingcarboninabovegroundbiomassforagroforestrywillentailthecollectionofsomelevelofinventoryoftreesassociatedwiththeagroforestrypractice.SimplifiedinventoryapproachesrequiringaminimumofworkbythelandownerhavebeendevelopedbytheUSDANaturalResourcesConservationServiceandtheColoradoStateUniversityNaturalResourceEcologicalLaboratory(USDA,2012),whicharelargelybasedonmethodsdescribedintheNaturalResourcesConservationServiceNationalForestHandbook(USDANRCS,2004).Thespecificactivitydatarequirementsinclude:
Speciesoftreesandnumberbyageofdiameterclassforeachagroforestrypractice;and Diameteratbreastheightforasubsampleoftreesusingoneofthreesamplingmethodsthat
capturethespacingarrangementsanddensitieswithinthedifferentpractices(i.e.,rowtypeplantings,woodlot‐likeplantings,andriparianforestbuffers).
3.5.1.4 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataareneededforthismethod.
3.5.1.5 ModelOutput
Modeloutputisgeneratedforthechangeinbiomasscarbonstocks.Thischangeisdeterminedbasedonsubtractingthetotalbiomasscarbonstockinthepreviousyearfromthetotalstockinthecurrentyear,whichwillincludebothherbaceousandwoodybiomass.Theherbaceousstockswillrepresentmeanestimatesoveryearsifthesameforages,crop,orrotationofcropsaregrown,andisonlyestimatedforalandusechange.TheapproachforestimatingbiomasscarbonforwetlandsandforestlandsaredescribedinSections4.3.1and6.2.1,respectively.
Emissionsintensityisalsoestimatedbasedontheamountofemissionsperunitofyieldforcropsincroplandsystems,orofanimalproductsingrazingsystems.Notethatthebiomasschangeisbasedsolelyonwoodyplantgrowthexceptinayearfollowingaland‐usechange.
![Page 48: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/48.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-48
Theemissionsintensityisestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
3.5.1.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
Uncertaintyinherbaceouscarbonstockchangeswillresultfromlackofprecisionincroporforageyields,residue‐yieldratios,root‐shootratios,andcarbonfractions,aswellastheuncertaintiesassociatedwithestimatingthebiomasscarbonstocksfortheotherlanduses.Emissionsintensitywillalsoincludeuncertaintyinthetotalyieldforthecrop,meat,ormilkproduct.Thisherbaceousbiomassmethodisbasedontheassumptionthathalfofthecropharvestyieldsorpeakforageamountsprovideanaccurateestimateofthemeanannualcarbonstockincroplandorgrazinglands.Thisassumptionwarrantsfurtherstudy,andthemethodmayneedtoberefinedinthefuture.
UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity.Table3‐6providestherelativeuncertaintyfortheDAYCENTmodelandthecarbonfractionofbiomass.
Table3‐6:AvailableUncertaintyDataforBiomassCarbonStockChanges
Parameter Mean UnitsRelativeUncertainty
Distribution DataSourceLow(%) High(%)
DAYCENT(empiricaluncertainty)
NS Various NS NS NormalOgleetal.(2007);EPA(2013)
Carbonfractionofabovegroundbiomass
0.45 Fraction 11 11 Normal IPCC(1997)
NS=NotShown.Dataarenotshownforparametersthathave100’sto1000’sofvalues(denotedasNS).
Theuncertaintydifferswhetheritisherbaceousbiomassortrees.Uncertaintyassociatedwithestimatingcarboninlivetreesisinfluencedbyanumberoffactors,includingsamplingandmeasurementerroranderrorassociatedwithregressionmodels(seeMelsonetal.2011;furtherdiscussioninForestrySection).Estimatingcarboninagroforestrytrees,especiallyforyoungseedlingsandsaplings(upto10yearsorsodependingonspeciesandgrowingconditions)remainshighlyuncertainparticularlysincetraditionalforestry‐derivedequationshavebeenshowntounderestimatewhole‐treebiomassinagroforestrysystemsandrequiresadditionalfieldworktofurtherdocumentbiomasscarbonallocationdifferences.Melsonetal.(2011)notedintheirforest‐basedworkthatestimationoflive‐treecarbonwassensitivetomodelselection(withmodel‐selectionerrorofpotentially20to40percent),andthatmodelselectioncouldbeimprovedbymatchingtreeformtoexistingequationsforuseinthemodels.On‐goingworkcomparingagroforestry‐derivedequationswithavarietyofforest‐derivedequationsintheGreatPlainsregionindicateuncertaintycouldbereducedthroughuseofacorrectionfactor.Currentlybelowgroundbiomass/Cestimatesarecalculatedusingtwoapproaches:root:shootratios(seeBirdsey,1992),
Equation3‐4:EmissionsIntensityofBiomassCarbon StockChange
EIBiomassC=ΔCBiomass/Y
Where:
EIBiomassC =Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2permetrictondrymattercropyield,metrictonsCO2perkgcarcassyield,ormetrictonsCO2perkgfluidmilkyield)
ΔCBiomass =ChangeinbiomassstockinCO2equivalents(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyield),meat(kgcarcassyield)ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyield)
![Page 49: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/49.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-49
andabovegrounddensityallometry(Cairnsetal.,1997),bothwithlargeuncertaintiesduetolackofdata.Thefullsetofprobabilitydistributionshavenotbeendevelopedfortheagroforestrymethod,andsowillrequirefurtherresearchbeforeuncertaintycanbeestimated.SeeChapter6,Forestry,forfurtherdiscussionofuncertaintyoftreevolumeandbiomassequations.
3.5.2 LitterCarbonStockChanges
Litterinherbaceousbiomassdecomposesmostlyoveraone‐yearperiod.HowevertheinfluenceoflittercarbonstocksonatmosphericCO2isassumedtobeinsignificantafteraddressingthechangesinbiomassandsubsequentinfluenceonsoilcarbonstocks.Furthermethodsdevelopmentmaybepossibleinthefuture,giventhispotentiallimitationtothemethodsinthisreport.Forcroplandorgrazinglandsystemswithtrees,coarsewoodydebrisandlittercarbonshouldbeestimatedbasedonforestmethods(SeeSection6.2.2.4and6.2.2.5).ThelossoflitterandcoarsewoodydebriswithconversionfromforestlandtocroplandandgrazinglandisalsoaddressedinSection6.3.
3.5.3 SoilCarbonStockChanges
3.5.3.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
SOCstocksareinfluencedbylanduseandmanagementincroplandandgrazinglandsystems,aswellasconversionfromotherlandusesintothesesystems(Aaldeetal.,2006).SOCpoolscanbemodifiedduetochangesincarboninputsandoutputs(Paustianetal.,1997).Carboninputswillchangeovertimeduetointerannualvariabilityandlongertermtrendsinnetprimaryproduction,aswellasdifferencesincarbonremovalsfromharvestingandresiduemanagementpractices.ExternalcarboninputswillalsohaveaninfluenceontheSOCstocks,suchasmanure,compost,sewagesludge,woodchips,andbiocharamendments.Carbonoutputswillchangeduetointerannualvariabilityandlongertermtrendsinmicrobialdecompositionrates.Inaddition,erosionanddepositioncontributetochangesinSOCstocksassociatedwithcropandgrazinglandsoils.Recentstudies(Hardenetal.,2008;VanOostetal.,2007)provideevidencethatthemajorityofcarboninerodedsoilsisdynamicallyreplaced,compensatingforthelosses,andatleastsomeofthecarbontransportedfromthesiteisdepositedattheedgeoffields,downslope,orinrivers.Inallcases,SOCismovedfromonelocationtoanotherundertheassumptionthatonlyaportionofthe
MethodforEstimatingSoilCarbonStockChanges
Mineralsoils: TheDAYCENTprocess‐basedsimulationmodelestimatesthesoilorganiccarbon(SOC)at
thebeginningandendoftheyear.TheseinputsareenteredintotheIPCCequationtoestimatecarbonstockchangesinmineralsoilsdevelopedbyLascoetal.(2006),andVerchotetal.(2006).
ThismethodwaschosenbecausetheDAYCENTmodelhasbeendemonstratedtorepresentthedynamicsofsoilorganiccarbonandestimatesoilorganiccarbonstockchangeinU.S.croplandandgrasslands(Partonetal.,1993),anduncertaintieshavebeenquantified(Ogleetal.(2007).Themodelcapturessoilmoisturedynamics,plantproduction,andthermalcontrolsonnetprimaryproductionanddecompositionwithatimestepofamonthorless.
OrganicSoils: IPCCequationdevelopedbyAaldeetal.(2006;USDA,2011)usingregionspecific
emissionfactorsfromOgleetal.(2003). Thismethodwaschosenbecauseitistheonlyreadilyavailablemodelforestimatingsoil
carbonstockchangesfromorganicsoils.
![Page 50: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/50.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-50
carbonintransportislosttotheatmosphere.Thisassumptionmayhavesignificantvariationduetothediversityofenvironmentalconditionsinwhicherodedcarbonistransportedandsubsequentlyresides.Otherenvironmentaldriverswillalsoinfluencecarbondynamicsinsoils,particularlyweatherandsoilcharacteristics.
Process‐basedmodels,whichareconsideredanIPCCTier3methodology,havebeendevelopedandsufficientlyevaluatedforapplicationinanoperationaltooltoestimateSOCstockchangesinmineralsoils.TheDAYCENTprocess‐basedmodel(Partonetal.,1987;Parton,1998)hasbeenselectedbecauseitiswell‐testedforestimatingsoilcarbondynamicsincroplandandgrazinglandsystems(Partonetal.,1993)andisalsousedintheU.S.nationalGHGinventory(Ogleetal.,2010;U.S.EPA,2011).DelGrossoetal.(2011)demonstratedthereductioninuncertaintyassociatedwiththemoreadvancedapproachusingtheDAYCENTmodelcomparedtothelowertiermethods.TheDAYCENTmodelsimulatesplantproductionbyrepresentinglong‐termeffectsoflanduseandmanagementonnetprimaryproduction(NPP),asinfluencedbyselectionofcropsandforagegrasses.TheinfluenceofmanagementpracticesonNPParealsosimulated,includingmineralfertilization,organicamendments,irrigationandfertigation,liming,greenmanuresandcovercrops,croppingintensity,hayorpastureinrotationwithannualcrops,grazingintensityandstockingrate,andbarefallow.Nutrientandmoisturedynamicsareinfluencedbysoilcharacteristics,suchassoiltexture.ThemethodaddressesinterannualvariabilityduetoannualchangesinmanagementandtheeffectofweatheronNPP.
IntheDAYCENTmodel,threesoilorganiccarbonpoolsareincludedrepresentingactive,slow,andpassivesoilorganicmatter,whichhavedifferentturnovertimes.Itisgenerallyconsideredthattheactivecarbonpoolismicrobialbiomassandassociatedmetaboliteshavingarapidturnover(monthstoyears),theslowcarbonpoolhasintermediatestabilityandturnovertimes(decades),andthepassivecarbonpoolrepresentshighlyprocessedandhumifieddecompositionproductswithlongerturnovertimes(centuries).However,thesepoolsarekineticallydefinedanddonotnecessarilyrepresentexplicitfractionsofsoilorganiccarbonthatcanbeisolated.Soiltexture,temperature,moistureavailability,aeration,burning,andotherfactorsarerepresentedinthesimulationsthatinfluencethedecompositionandlossofcarbonfromthesepools.
Themodelsimulatesmanagementpracticesinfluencingsoilorganiccarbonpools.Thesepracticesincludeadditionofcarboninmanureandotherorganicamendments,suchascompost,woodchips,andbiochar;tillageintensity;residuemanagement(retentionofresiduesinfieldwithoutincorporation,retentioninthefieldwithincorporation,andremovalwithharvest,burning,orgrazing).Theinfluenceofbareandvegetatedfallowsisrepresented,inadditiontoirrigationeffectsondecompositionincroplandandgrazinglandsystems.Themodelcanalsosimulatesetting‐asidecroplandfromproduction;theinfluenceoffireonoxidationofsoilorganicmatter;andwoodyplantencroachment,agroforestry,andsilvopastureeffectsoncarboninputsandoutputs.
Awater/soilmoisturesubmodel(e.g.,Partonetal.,1987)isusedtorepresenttheinfluenceofweather,irrigation,croptype,andmanagementonsoilmoisturedynamics.Thisimpactisparticularlyimportantbecausemoisturetendstobeamoreproximalfactorcontrollingsoilorganiccarbondynamics,which,inturn,isinfluencedbylanduseandmanagementactivity.Forexample,irrigationinfluencesplantproductionandcarboninputsbecauseofthemodificationtothemoistureregime.
ThemodeledestimatesfromDAYCENTarecombinedwithmeasurementdatafromamonitoringnetworktoformallyevaluateuncertainty.Thisapproachleveragesthescalabilityofthemodelwhileprovidinganunderlyingmeasurement‐basisforthemethod(Conantetal.,2011;Ogleetal.,2007).
![Page 51: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/51.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-51
Erosionanddepositioninfluencesoilorganiccarbonstocks(Izaurraldeetal.,2007)andthereforearerepresentedinthemethod,althoughthereisuncertaintyintheneteffectonCO2exchangebetweenthebiosphereandatmosphere.Moreover,thereisalsosomeriskofdouble‐countingcarbonasitistransferredacrossownershipboundaries,intermsofwhoreceivescreditfortheerodedcarbonintheiraccounting.Regardless,erosionclearlyhasanimpactoncarbonstocksinafield,whichcanbeestimatedwithreasonableaccuracyusingerosioncalculators,suchastheRevisedUniversalSoilLossEquation,Version2(RUSLE2)forwatererosion(USDA,2003)andWindErosionPredictionSystem(WEPS)forwinderosion(USDA,2004).Therefore,thecurrentmethodwillincludeanestimateoferosion‐relatedcarbonlossfromafield,butneitherthefateoferodedC,northedepositionofcarbonfromotherareasontoalandparcel,willbeestimated.Asmorestudiesareconducted,carbontransportanddepositioncanbeincorporatedinfutureversionsofthemethod.
Drainageoforganicsoilsforcropproductionleadstonetannualemissionsduetoincreaseddecompositionoftheorganicmatterafterloweringthewatertableandcreatingaerobicconditionsintheupperlayersofthesoil(Allen,2012;ArmentanoandMenges,1986).Therehasbeenlessevaluationofprocess‐basedmodelsfororganicsoils,particularlythesimulationofwatertabledynamicsthroughouttheyear,whichwillinfluencetheemissionrate.Consequently,theapproachisbasedonmoresimplisticemissionfactorapproachdevelopedbytheIPCC(Aaldeetal.,2006).ThemethodincorporatesU.S.emissionratesassociatedwithregion‐specificdrainagepatterns(Ogleetal.,2003),soitisaTier2methodasdefinedbytheIPCC.
3.5.3.2 DescriptionofMethod
ThemethodrepresentingtheinfluenceoflanduseandmanagementonSOCandassociatedCO2fluxtotheatmosphereisestimatedwithacarbonstockchangeapproach(Aaldeetal.,2006).Formineralsoils,themethodwillrequireestimatesofcarbonstocksatthebeginningandendoftheyearinordertoestimatetheannualchangeusingtheequationbelow.Incontrast,carbonstockchangesinorganicsoils(i.e.,Histosols)willaddressonlytheemissionsoccurringwithdrainage,whichisthetypicalsituationincropland.Emissionsoccurinorganicsoilsfollowingdrainageduetotheconversionofananaerobicenvironmentwithahighwatertabletoaerobicconditions(ArmentanoandMenges,1986),resultinginasignificantlossofcarbontotheatmosphere(Ogleetal.,2003).Recentdataonsubsidencewereusedtoderivetheseestimates(e.g.,Shihetal.,1998).
MineralSoils:ThemodeltoestimatechangesinSOCstocksformineralsoilshasbeenadaptedfromthemethoddevelopedbyIPCC(Aaldeetal.,2006).Theannualchangeinstockstoa30centimeterdepthforalandparcelisestimatedusingthefollowingequation:
Equation3‐5:ChangeinSoilOrganicCarbon StocksforMineralSoils
ΔCMineral=[(SOCt‐SOCt‐1)/t]×A×CO2MW
Where:
ΔCMineral =Annualchangeinmineralsoilorganiccarbonstock(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
SOCt =Soilorganiccarbonstockattheendoftheyear(metrictonsCha‐1)
SOCt‐1 =Soilorganiccarbonstockatthebeginningoftheyear(metrictonsCha‐1)
t =1year
A =Areaofparcel(ha)
CO2MW =RatioofmolecularweightofCO2tocarbon =44/12(metrictonsCO2(metrictonsC)‐1)
![Page 52: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/52.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-52
TheDAYCENTmodelisusedtosimulatetheSOCstocksatthebeginningandendofeachyearforEquation3‐5basedonrecentmanagementpracticesforalandparcel.InitialvaluesforDAYCENTareneededfortheSOCt‐1andarebasedonasimulationofhistoricalmanagementtoprovideaccuratestocksanddistributionoforganiccarbonamongthepoolsrepresentedinthemodel(active,slow,andpassivesoilorganicmatterpools).Eachpoolhasadifferentturnoverrate(representingtheheterogeneousnatureofsoilorganicmatter),andtheamountofcarbonineachpoolatanypointintimeinfluencestheforwardtrajectoryofthetotalsoilorganiccarbonstorage(Partonetal.,1987).Bysimulatingthehistoricallanduse,thedistributionsofcarboninactive,slow,andpassivepoolsareestimatedinanunbiasedway.
Threestepsarerequiredtoestimatetheinitialvalues.Thefirststepinvolvesrunningthemodeltoasteady‐statecondition(e.g.,equilibrium)undernativevegetation,historicalclimatedata,andthesoilphysicalattributesforthelandparcel.Thesecondstepistosimulateperiodoftimefromthe1800’sto1980and1980to2000.Theentityisprovidedalistofoptionsforselectingthepracticesthatbestmatchthelandmanagementfortheparcel.From2000totheinitialyearforreporting,theentityentersmorespecificdataoncropsplanted,tillagepractices,fertilizationpractices,irrigation,andothermanagementactivity(SeeSection3.5.3.3formoreinformation).Thesimulatedcarbonstockattheendofthesimulationprovidestheinitialbaselinevalue(SOCt‐1).
Thestockattheendofayear(SOCt)isestimatedbytheDAYCENTmodelbasedonsimulatingmanagementactivityduringthespecificyear.Theentityprovidesthemanagementactivityforthelandparcel,includingcropsplanted,tillagepractices,fertilizationpractices,irrigationandothermanagementactivitydata(SeeSection3.5.3.3formoreinformation).ThechangeinSOCstocksareestimatedforadditionalyearsbyusingtheendingstockfromthepreviousyearastheinitialSOCstock(SOCt‐1)andthensimulatingthemanagementforanotheryeartoproducethestockattheendofthenextyear(SOCt).
ErodedcarbonisestimatedwiththeRUSLE2forwatererosion(USDA,2003)andWEPSforwinderosion(USDA,2004).NeitherthedepositionofcarbononthesitenorthefateoferodedcarbonisinthisversionoftheUSDAmethods.TheerodedcarbonestimateisreportedseparatelytoaccountforuncertaintyassociatedwiththepotentialeffectoferosiononSOCstocks,andmaybeusedasadiscountfortheSOCstockchangesestimatewithEquation3‐5.
TheDAYCENTmodelisnotabletoestimatesoilorganiccarbonstocksinmineralsoilsforallcrops.IninstanceswhereacropisnotestimatedbytheDAYCENTmodel,themethoddevelopedbytheIPCC(2006)(i.e.,aTier1methodology)maybeused(SeeAppendix3‐B).
OrganicSoils:ThemethodologyforestimatingsoilcarbonstockchangesindrainedorganicsoilshasbeenadoptedfromIPCC(Aaldeetal.,2006).ThemethodappliestoHistosolsandsoilsthathavehighorganicmattercontentanddevelopedundersaturated,anaerobicconditionsforatleastpartoftheyear,whichincludesHistels,Historthels,andHistoturbels.Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimateemissionsfromalandparcel:
![Page 53: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/53.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-53
EmissionfactorshavebeenadoptedfromOgleetal.(2003)andareregion‐specific,basedontypicaldrainagepatternsandclimaticcontrolsondecompositionrates;theseratesarealsousedintheU.S.nationalGHGinventory(U.S.EPA,2011).Drainedcroplandsoilslosecarbonatarateof11±2.5metrictonsCha‐1year‐1incooltemperateregions,14±2.5metrictonsCha‐1year‐1inwarmtemperateregions,and14±3.3metrictonsCha‐1year‐1insubtropicalclimateregions.Organicsoilsingrazinglandsaretypicallynotdrainedtothedepthofcroplandsystems,andthereforetheemissionfactorsareonly25percentofthecroplandvalues(Ogleetal.,2003).
3.5.3.3 ActivityData
Theactivitydatarequirementsvarybetweenmineralsoilsandorganicsoils.Mineralsoilsrequirethefollowingactivitydataforcroplands:
Areaoflandparcel(i.e.,field); Cropselectionandrotationsequence; Plantingandharvestingdates; Residuemanagement,includingamountharvested,burned,grazed,orleftinthefield; Irrigationmethod,applicationrate,andtimingofwaterapplications; Mineralfertilizertype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Limeamendmenttype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Organicamendmenttype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Tillageimplements,datesofoperation,andnumberofpassesineachoperation(whichcan
beusedtodeterminetillageintensitywiththeSTIRModel(USDANRCS,2008)); Useofdrainagepracticesanddepthofdrainage(commonlyinhydricsoils);and Covercroptypes,planting,andharvestingdates(ifapplicable).
Themethodforgrazinglandonmineralsoilsrequiresthefollowingmanagementactivitydata:
Areaoflandparcel(i.e.,field); Plantspeciescomposition; Periodsofgrazingduringtheyear; Animaltype,class,andsizeusedforgrazing; Stockingratesandmethods; Irrigationmethod,applicationrate,andtimingofwaterapplications; Mineralfertilizertype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Limeamendmenttype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Organicamendmenttype,applicationrate,andtimingofapplication(s); Pasture/Range/Paddock(PRP)Nexcreteddirectlyontolandbylivestock(i.e.,manurethat
isnotmanaged);
Equation3‐6:ChangeinSoilOrganicCarbon StocksforOrganicSoils
ΔCOrganic=A×EF×CO2MW
Where:
ΔCOrganic=AnnualCO2emissionsfromdrainedorganicsoilsincropandgrazinglands (metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
A =Areaofdrainedorganicsoils(ha)
EF =Emissionfactor(metrictonsCha‐1year‐1)
CO2MW=RatioofmolecularweightofCO2toC(=44/12)(metrictonsCO2(metrictonsC)‐1)
![Page 54: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/54.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-54
Useofdrainagepracticesanddepthofdrainage(commonlyinhydricsoils); Levelofwoodyplantencroachment;and Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1)
ormilk(kgfluidmilkyear‐1).
Longer‐termhistoryofsitemanagementwillbeusedtosimulateinitialsoilorganiccarbonstocksforthecroporgrazingsystem.Inordertoestimatetheinitialvalues,theentitywillneedtoprovidemanagementactivitydataforthepastthreedecades.Alistofmanagementsystemswillbeprovided.Theentitywillalsoprovidethepreviouslanduseandyearofconversionifaland‐usechangeoccurredduringthepastthreedecades.Historicaldataforactivityfrommorethanthreedecadesinthepastwillberepresentedbasedonnationalagriculturalstatisticsusingenterprisebudgetsandcensusdataforvariousregionsinthecountry.However,anentitycanprovidethelongertermhistoryifitisknown.Dataonthecarbonandnitrogencontentoforganicamendmentswillalsobeneededfromtheentity,althoughdefaultsareprovidedbelowiftheentitydoesnothavethisinformation.Pasture/Range/Paddock(PRP)manureNinputistheNexcreteddirectlyontolandbylivestock,andthemanureisnotcollectedormanaged(deKleinetal.,2006).TheamountofPRPmanureNisestimatedwiththelivestockmethods(SeeChapter5,Section5.3.2EntericFermentationandHousingEmissionsfromBeefProductionSystems)andassumedtobesplitwith50%oftheNinurineandtheother50%oftheNinsolids.
Table3‐7:NitrogenandCarbonFractionsofCommonOrganicFertilizers–MidpointandRange(PercentbyWeight)
OrganicFertilizer %Na %CPoultrymanure 2.25%(1.5‐3) 8.75%(7‐10.5)b
Pig,horse,cowmanure 0.45%(0.3‐0.6) 5.1%(3.4–6.8)c
Greenmanure 3.25%(1.5‐5) 42%d
Compost 1.25%(0.5‐2) 16%(12‐20)e
Seaweedmeal 2.5%(2‐3) 27%f
Sewagesludge 3%(1‐5) 11.7%(3.9‐19.5)b
Fishwaste 7%(4‐10) 24.3%(14.6‐34)g
Blood 11%(10‐12) 35.2%(32‐38.4)h
Humanurine/nightsoil 1.25%(1‐1.5) 9.5%(9‐10)iaHue,N.V.OrganicFertilizersinSustainableAgricultureRetrievedfromhttp://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/huen/hue_organic.htm.bUSDA.1992.AgriculturalWasteCharacteristics.Chapter4.InAnimalWasteManagementFieldHandbook:NaturalResourcesConservationService,UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture.cEPA,2013.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2011.WeightedU.S.averagecarbon:nitrogenratioformanureavailableforapplication.dAssumesdrymatteris42%carbon.eA1Organics.CompostClassification,SpecificationandResourceManual.http://www.a1organics.com/CLSP/CLASS%20MANUAL%20‐%20COLORADO.pdffhttp://www.naorganics.com/en/science_analysis.asp.NorthAtlanticOrganics.gHartz,T.K.andP.R.Johnstone.2006.Nitrogenavailablefromhigh‐nitrogen‐containingorganicfertilizers.HortTechnology16:39‐42.hSonon,D,etal.2012.Mineralizationofhigh‐Norganicfertilizers.ClemsonUniversity.iPolprasert,C.2007.OrganicWasteRecycling:TechnologyandManagement.IWAPublishing.
Themethodfororganicsoilsrequiresthefollowingactivitydataforcroplandsandgrazinglands:
Areaoflandparcel(i.e.,field);and Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1)
ormilk(kgfluidmilkyear‐1).
![Page 55: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/55.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-55
3.5.3.4 AncillaryData
Ancillarydataforthemineralsoilmethodincludehistoricalweatherpatternsandsoilcharacteristics.WeatherdatamaybebasedonnationaldatasetssuchastheParameter‐ElevationRegressionsonIndependentSlopesModel(PRISM)data(Dalyetal.,2008).SoilcharacteristicsmayalsobebasedonnationaldatasetssuchastheSoilSurveyGeographicDatabase(SSURGO)(SoilSurveyStaff,2011).However,therewillalsobeanoptionforentitiestosubstitutesoilsdatacollectedfromthespecificfield.Theerosionmodelwillalsorequireancillarydataontopography(i.e.,slope),lengthoffieldandroworientation,cropcanopyheight,diversions,surfaceresiduecover,andsoiltexture.
Noancillarydataareneededforthemethodtoestimateemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils.
3.5.3.5 ModelOutput
Modeloutputisgeneratedforthequantityofemissionsandemissionsintensity.Thechangeinmineralsoilorganiccarbonstocksisestimatedbasedonstockchangesoverfive‐yeartimeperiodsinordertomanageuncertainty.Uncertaintiesinthemodel‐basedestimatesareaboutthreetimeslargerforannualestimatesinchangeratecomparedwithfive‐yearblocks(CompareU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency(2009)and(2010)).Uncertaintiesarelargeratthefinertimescalebecausethereislargevariabilityinmeasurementsofsoilcarbonstockchangesatannualtimescales,andthisvariabilityisincorporatedintothemodeluncertaintyusingtheempiricallybasedmethod(Ogleetal.,2007).Inaddition,trendsinsoilorganiccarbonwillbeestimatedforthe30previousyearsofhistoryandthereportingperiod.
Emissionsintensityisbasedontheamountofemissionsperunitofyieldforcropsincroplandsystemsoranimalproductsingrazingsystems.Theemissionsintensityisestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
3.5.3.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
Uncertaintiesinthemineralsoilmethodsincludeimprecisionandbiasintheprocess‐basedmodelparametersandalgorithms,inadditiontouncertaintiesintheactivityandancillarydata.Uncertaintyintheparameterizationandalgorithmswillbequantifiedwithanempiricallybasedapproach,asusedintheU.S.nationalGHGinventory(Ogleetal.,2007;U.S.EPA,2011).ThemethodcombinesmodelingandmeasurementstoprovideanestimateofSOCstockchangesforentityscalereporting(Conantetal.,2011).Measurementsofcarbonstockchangesareexpectedtobebasedon
Equation3‐7:EmissionsIntensityofSoilOrganicCarbon StockChange
EISoilC=(ΔCMineral+ΔCOrganic)/Y
Where:
EISoilC =Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2permetrictondrymattercropyield,metrictonsCO2perkgcarcassyield,metrictonsCO2perkgfluidmilkyield)
ΔCMineral =AnnualCO2equivalentemissionsfromsoilorganiccarbonchangeinmineralsoils(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
ΔCOrganic =AnnualCO2equivalentemissionsfromsoilorganiccarbonchangeinorganicsoils,Histosols(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1)ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyieldyear‐1)
![Page 56: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/56.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-56
anationalsoilmonitoringnetwork(Spenceretal.,2011).Thenetworkshouldincludesamplesfromdifferentregionsofthecountryandsoiltypesthatareusedforcropproductionorgrazing,andarandomsamplingofthemanagementsystemsineachoftheregions.ThesamplingplotswillneedtobedesignedforresamplingovertimeinordertoevaluatethemodeledchangesinSOCstocks(Conantetal.,2003).Uncertaintiesinnationaldatasetsforweatherwillbebasedoninformationincludedwiththedataset,whileuncertaintiesintheSSURGOshouldbequantifiedusingtheunderlyingfielddatathatformthebasisforthemappingexercise,oranindependentaccuracyassessmentofthemapproduct.Otherinputdataisassumedtobeknownbytheentity,suchasthecropplants,yields,tillage,andresiduemanagementpractices.
Thelimitationsofthemineralsoilcarbonmethodincludenoassessmentoftheeffectoflanduseandmanagementinsub‐surfacelayersofthesoilprofile(below30centimeters),noassessmentofthelocationoftransportanddepositionoferodedC,andlimiteddatatoassessuncertaintyintheparametersandalgorithmsusingtheempiricallybasedmethod.Foragroforestry,theDAYCENTmodelhasbeenusedintheCOMET‐Farmvoluntarycarbonreportingtooltosimulatesoilorganiccarbonstockchanges.However,thereareseveralunknownswiththeuseoftheDAYCENTmodelforestimatingsoilorganiccarbonstockchangesinagroforestry,includingwhetherthemodelisabletotakeintoaccounttheinteractionsoccurringbetweenwoodyandherbaceousvegetationandrespectivemanagementactivities.OelbermannandVoroney(2011)evaluatedtheuseoftheCenturymodel,themonthlytime‐stepversionoftheDAYCENTmodel,topredictsoilorganiccarbonintemperateandtropicalalleycroppingsystemsthatwere13and19yearsold,respectively.Theyfoundthatthemodelunderestimatedthelevelsofsoilorganiccarboncomparedwithmeasuredvalues.Withmoretesting,themethodsmayberevisedinthefuturetousetheDAYCENTmodelforthepurposesofestimatingsoilorganiccarbonstockchangesinagroforestrysystems.
Biocharresearchhasbeenanareaofrapiddevelopmentoverthepastfewyears,buttherearestilluncertainties.Biocharisaproductofcombustedbiomassthathasavarietyofchemicalstructuresdependingonthebiomassandpyrolysismethod,andthevariationhasimplicationsforthestabilityofthecarboninthesoil(Spokas,2010).BiocharcanhaveconcomitantimpactsonemissionsofotherGHGssuchasCH4andN2O(Cayuelaetal.,2010;Malghanietal.,2013;Yuetal.,2013),althoughsomestudieshaveshownnoeffect(Caseetal.,2013;Cloughetal.,2010).SoilamendmentswithbiocharmayalsoprimethedecompositionofthenativesoilorganicmatteralthoughtheCO2emissionsfromprimingappeartobeconsiderablysmallerthanthecarbonaddedinthebiochar(Stewartetal.,2013;WoolfandLehmann,2012).Otherresearchsuggeststhattheremayevenbe“negative”primingleadingtoareductioninheterotrophicrespiration(Caseetal.,2013).Furthermore,thetemporaldurationoftheGHGmitigationpotentialofbiocharisalsouncertainbutappearstobeofashorttermnature(Spokas,2013).TheinfluenceofbiocharonemissionsandprimingneedsmoreresearchbeforethefulleffectofbiocharoncarbonsequestrationandGHGemissionscanbeincorporatedintomodelsandGHGreportingframeworks.Microbialdegradationofbiocharcanoccurovertimescalesrangingfromaslittleasafewdecadesto1000sofyears(Spokas,2010).Inthetechnicalmethods,biocharistreatedasahighcarbontolownitrogenamendmentintheDAYCENTmodelframework,butwithaconservativeresidencetimeofthecarbonfromdecadestoacentury.Thesemethodscanbefurtherrefinedinthefutureasthedifferenttypesandresidencetimesofbiochararefurtherresolved.
Themethodfororganicsoilsalsohaslimitations,particularlytheinabilitytoestimatetheeffectofmitigationmeasuressuchaswatertablemanagementbecauseemissionfactorsaresetforeachclimateregion(i.e.,currentlyscalingfactorsarenotavailabletorevisetheemissionfactorsforwatertablemanagement).Onlycompleterestorationofthewetlandwithnofurtherdrainagecanbeaddressedwiththemethod(i.e.,assumesnofurtheremissionsofCO2).However,ifcrop
![Page 57: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/57.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-57
productionismaintainedonthelandparcel,themostpracticalmethodforreducingemissionsistoraisethewatertabletoneartherootingdepthofthecropduringthegrowingseasonandthennotdrainingthesoilduringthenon‐growingseason(Jongedyketal.,1950;Shihetal.,1998),orpossiblymanagingthesystemwithperiodicflooding(Morrisetal.,2004).
Forallsystemsthereisadditionaluncertaintyassociatedwithclimatechange.Modeledoutputforanygivenlocationassumestemperatureandprecipitationsimilartothatofthepast30years,theperiodforwhichhistoricalweatherisusedtosimulatesoilorganiccarbondynamics.Expectedchangesintemperature,precipitation,andextremeeventssuchasdroughts,floods,andheatwaveswilladdfurtheruncertaintytoestimatesofsoilorganiccarbonstockchange.
WhilethereisconsiderableevidenceandmechanisticunderstandingabouttheinfluenceoflanduseandmanagementonSOC,thereislessknownabouttheeffectonsoilinorganicC.Consequently,thereisuncertaintyassociatedwithlanduseandmanagementimpactsonsoilinorganiccarbonstocks,whichcannotbequantified.CurrentmethodsdonotincludeimpactsoninorganicC,butthismaybeaddedinthefutureasmorestudiesareconductedandmethodsaredeveloped.
UncertaintiesinmodelparametersandstructurearecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity.Table3‐8providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionsassociatedwiththemineralandorganicsoilsmethods.
Table3‐8:AvailableUncertaintyDataforSoilOrganicCarbonStockChange
Parameter Mean Units
RelativeUncertainty
Distribution DataSourceLow(%)
High(%)
DAYCENT(empiricaluncertainty) NS Various NS NS Normal
Ogleetal.(2007);EPA(2013)
Emissionfactorforcroplandincooltemperateregions 11
metrictonsCha‐1year‐1 45 45 Normal
Ogleetal.(2003)
Emissionfactorforcroplandinwarmtemperateregions 14
metrictonsCha‐1year‐1 35 35 Normal
Ogleetal.(2003)
Emissionfactorforcroplandinsubtropicalregions 14
metrictonsCha‐1year‐1 46 46 Normal
Ogleetal.(2003)
Emissionfactorforgrazinglandincooltemperateregions
2.8metrictonsCha‐1year‐1
45 45 NormalOgleetal.(2003)
Emissionfactorforgrazinglandinwarmtemperateregions
3.5metrictonsCha‐1year‐1
35 35 NormalOgleetal.(2003)
Emissionfactorforgrazinglandinsubtropicalregions
3.5metrictonsCha‐1year‐1
46 46 NormalOgleetal.(2003)
NS=NotShown.Dataarenotshownforparametersthathave100’sto1000’sofvalues(denotedasNS).
![Page 58: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/58.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-58
3.5.4 SoilNitrousOxide
3.5.4.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
N2Ofluxesarenotoriouslydifficulttomeasurebecauseofthelaborrequiredtosampleemissions,combinedwithhighspatialandtemporalvariability.AgronomicpracticesthataffectN2Ofluxesinonesoil,climate,orsite‐yearmayhavelittleornomeasurableeffectinothers.Consequently,considerablecareisrequiredtoensurethatmethodstoestimatechangesinemissionsforaparticularcroppingpracticeareaccurateandrobustforthegeographicregionforwhichtheyareproposed,oraresufficientlygeneralizabletobeaccurateinaggregate.
DeKleinetal.(2006)providethreeestimationstrategiesfordirectN2Oemissionsfromcropland.Twoarebasedonemissionfactors,theproportionofnitrogenaddedtoacropthatbecomesN2O.Tier1isbasedonanear‐universalemissionfactor,applicablegloballywithoutregardtogeography,croppingpractice,orfertilizerplacement,timing,orformulation.Tier2methodsutilize
MethodforEstimatingSoilDirectN2OEmissions
MineralSoils
Themethodisbasedonusingresultsfromprocess‐basedmodelsandmeasuredN2OemissionsincombinationwithscalingfactorsbasedonU.S.specificempiricaldataonaseasonaltimescale.
Process‐basedmodeling(anensembleapproachusingDAYCENTandDNDC)combinedwithfielddataanalysisareusedtoderivebaseemissionratesforthemajorcroppingsystemsanddominantsoiltextureclassesineachUSDALandResourceRegion.Incaseswherethereareinsufficientempiricaldatatoderiveabaseemissionrate,thebaseemissionrateisbasedontheIPCCdefaultfactor.Thebaseemissionfactorsareadjustedbyscalingfactorsrelatedtospecificcropmanagementpracticesthatarederivedfromexperimentaldata.
OrganicSoils
DirectN2OemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoilsusestheIPCCequationsdevelopedindeKleinetal.,(2006).Themethodfororganicsoilsassumesthatthereisstillasignificantorganichorizoninthesoil,andtherefore,therearesubstantialinputsofnitrogenfromoxidationoforganicmatter.
TheemissionratefordrainedorganicsoilsisbasedonIPCCTier1emissionfactor(0.008metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1).
Thismethodreliesonentityspecificactivitydataasinputintotheequations.
MethodforEstimatingSoilIndirectN2OEmissions
ThismethodusestheIPCCequationforindirectsoilN2O(deKleinetal.,2006). IPCCdefaultsareusedforestimatingtheproportionofnitrogenthatissubjectto
leaching,runoff,andvolatilization.Inlandparcelswheretheprecipitationplusirrigationwaterinputislessthan80percentofthepotentialevapotranspiration,nitrogenleachingandrunoffareconsiderednegligibleandnoindirectN2Oemissionsareestimatedfromleachingandrunoff.
Thismethodusesentityspecificseasonaldataonnitrogenmanagementpractices.
![Page 59: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/59.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-59
geographic,crop,orpractice‐specificemissionfactorswherefieldtestsshowthatafactordifferentfromtheonepercentTier1factoriswarranted.AtpresentthereisonlyoneTier2exampleintheprimaryliteraturethatisspecifictoconditionsintheUnitedStates,anditisforcornintheNorthCentralregion(Millaretal.,2010).ThismethodhasbeenincorporatedintoseveralN2Oreductionprotocols(VerifiedCarbonStandard,AmericanCarbonRegistry,andClimateActionReserve).ThethirdoptionforestimatingdirectN2Oemissions,orTier3,isameasurementorprocess‐basedmodelingapproach.Inthiscase,emissionsaremonitoredspecificallyfortheentity’sfieldbydeployinginstrumentsinameasurementsystemorbygatheringtheinformationspecifictothefieldconditionstosimulateN2Oemissionswithaprocess‐basedmodel.Thisthirdoptionisthemostprecise,butrequiresmoreresourcesandsufficienttestingpriortoimplementation.
InSection3.2.1.1,severalpracticesarediscussedthathavebeenshowntoreduceN2Oemissionsinfieldexperiments.However,manyoftheexperimentshavebeenconductedforalimitednumberofspecificcroppingsystemsandregions.Consequently,therearenomitigationpracticesforwhichemissionreductionshavebeenquantifiedunderallconditionsintheUnitedStates.Nevertheless,formanypracticesthereissufficientknowledgeatthecroppingsystemandregionallevelstoestablishthatadoptionwillreducesoilN2Oemissions.
Process‐basedsimulationmodelsuseknowledgeofC,N,andwaterprocesses(amongothers)topredictecosystemresponsestoclimateandotherenvironmentalfactors,includingcropandgrazinglandmanagement(seesoilcarbonmethodologyinSection3.5.3).N2Ofluxescanbepredictedusingsimulationmodels(Chenetal.,2008;DelGrossoetal.,2010).Akeyadvantageofsimulationmodelsisthattheyaregeneralizabletoawidevarietyofsoils,climates,andcroppingsystems,allowingfactorstointeractincomplexwaysthatmaybedifficulttopredictwithlesssophisticatedapproaches.However,adisadvantageisthatcomplexitycanlimittheirtransparency,andatpresenttherearestillsubstantialdatagapsthatlimitourabilitytofullytestavailablemodelsfortheirsensitivitytodifferentmanagementpracticesacrossvariousregionsandcropsintheUnitedStates.
Toovercomethesechallenges,ahybridapproachthatutilizesprocess‐basedsimulationmodelsandfielddatawasdevelopedtoestimateN2Oemissions.Themethodusesabaseemissionrateassociatedwiththetypicalamountofnitrogenapplied,andthenadjustmentsareappliedviascalingfactorstoaccountformanagementpracticesthataffectN2Oemissions.ThisapproachisaTier3methodasdefinedbytheIPCC.
Baseemissionratesareestimatedforeachdominantcropandthreesoiltextureclasses(coarse,medium,fine)withinaclimaticregionusingprocess‐basedsimulationmodeling.ThefactorsaredevelopedatthescaleofUSDALandResourceRegions(LRR).FielddataindicatethatN2Oemissionsgenerallyincreaseastheamountofappliednitrogenincreases,especiallywhennitrogenapplicationratesexceedcropuptakerates(Hobenetal.,2011;Kimetal.,2013;McSwineyandRobertson,2005;Shcherbaketal.,inpress)Researchdatafromfieldexperimentswerecompiledandusedtoadjusttheemissionratesfornitrogenfertilizerapplicationratesthatexceededthetypicalnitrogenapplicationrateforthecropinalandresourceregion.Forcropswheresufficientdataarenotavailabletosimulatethebaseemissionratewithaprocess‐basedmodel,thestandardIPCCTier1emissionfactorisapplied.Inaddition,forlandparcelsthathaveamixofcropswhereonlysomecanbesimulated,thestandardIPCCTier1approachshouldalsobeapplied.
Emissionsareaffectedbyspecificfarmmanagementpracticessuchasreducingtillageintensity;addingnitrificationinhibitors,orchanginghow,whenandwherenitrogenfertilizersareapplied.ToaccountfortheeffectofmanagementpracticesonN2Oemission,scalingfactorsweredevelopedtoadjustthebaseemissionrates.Thescalingfactorswereestimatedfromavailableresearchdata(SeeAppendix3‐Aformoreinformation).Managementpracticesotherthanthoseincludedinthe
![Page 60: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/60.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-60
equationmayalsomitigateN2Oemissions,buttherearenotcurrentlysufficientdatatocreategeneralizedscalingfactors.Additionaldatamayleadtotheirinclusioninfutureupdatestothemethod.
ThismethodincorporatesmoreinformationthanamethodbasedsolelyontheIPCCmodel.Itprovidesatransparentandscience‐basedmeansofestimatingannualizedN2Oemissionsfromcropandgrazinglands,anditfacilitatestheestimationofuncertainty.ForN2Oemissionsfromcropandgrazinglands,anIPCCTier1approachisonlysensitivetonitrogenapplicationrate,andthereforedoesnotreflectthefullsuiteoffactorsthatareknowntoinfluenceN2Oemissionsincludingclimate,soils,crops,andmanagementpracticesthatrangefromtillagetocovercropstofertilizertiming,placement,formulation,andadditives.DynamicprocessmodelsasembodiedintheIPCCTier3approachcan,inconcept,accountformostofthesefactorsbuttodatehavenotbeensufficientlyevaluatedformanyU.S.locations,crops,andmanagementpractices.Thisreporttakesahybridapproachthatrepresentsthebestavailablescienceatthetimeofpublication:dynamicprocessmodelstoestimatebaselineN2Oemissionsforthosecropsandlocationssufficientlyevaluated,thenscaledbymanagementpracticestotheextentsupportedbyavailableresearchresults.InitialtestingindicatesthatthismethodismoresensitivetoU.S.nutrientmanagementpracticesthantheIPCCTier1approach.Theauthorsanticipatepublicationofanaddendumthatwillprovidetestresultsandsuggestfurthertuningofthemethod.Overtime,asdynamicprocessmodelsarefurtherdevelopedandtested.ThemethodwilllikelymigratetowardsanexclusiveTier3approachtobetteraccountformanagementeffectsgiventhelocalvariablesandconditions.Intheinterim,inadditiontoprovidingbest‐availableandreliableestimatesofN2Oemissionsfromcropandgrazinglands,themethodoutlinedhereisexpectedtosetaresearchagendathatprovidesforbroaderevaluationofenvironmentalconditionsandmanagementpracticesinfluencingN2Oemissionsaswellasfurtherdevelopmentofmodelstomoreaccuratelyestimateemissions.
OffsiteorindirectN2Oemissions,whichoccurwhenreactivenitrogenescapestodownwindordownstreamecosystemswherefavorableconditionsforN2Oproductionexist,areevenmoredifficulttoestimatethandirectemissionsbecausethereisuncertaintyinboththeamountofreactivenitrogenthatescapesandtheportionofthisnitrogenthatisconvertedtoN2O.Ideally,fluxesofvolatileandsolublereactivenitrogenleavingtheentity’sparceloflandwouldbecombinedwithatmospherictransportandhydrologicmodelstosimulatethefateofreactiveN.Atpresenttherearenolinkedmodelingapproachessufficientlytestedtobeusedinanoperationalframework.Consequently,theindirectN2OemissionsarebasedontheIPCCTier1method(deKleinetal.,2006).
Similarly,directN2OemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoilsarebasedontheIPCCTier1methods(deKleinetal.,2006).AlthoughresearchisongoingtoprovideimprovedemissionfactorsandmethodsforestimatingN2Oemissionsfromdrainageoforganicsoils(Allen,2012),moretestingwillbeneededbeforeincorporatingthemintoanoperationalmethod.Futurerevisionstothesemethodswillneedtoconsideradvancementsandrevisethemethodsaccordingly.
3.5.4.2 DescriptionofMethod
N2Oisemittedfromcroplandbothdirectlyandindirectly.Directemissionsarefluxesfromcroplandorgrazinglandswheretherearenitrogenadditionsornitrogenmineralizedfromsoilorganicmatter.IndirectemissionsoccurwhenreactivenitrogenisvolatilizedasNH3orNOxortransportedviasurfacerunofforleachinginsolubleformsfromcroplandorgrazinglands,leadingtoN2Oemissionsinanotherlocation.
![Page 61: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/61.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-61
DirectN2OEmissions
MineralSoils:TotaldirectN2OemissionsfrommineralsoilsareestimatedforalandparcelusingEquation3‐8.
Thepractice‐scaledemissionratefortheparcelofland(ERp)isestimatedusingEquation3‐9.
Equation3‐8:DirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils
N2ODirect=ERp×A×N2OMW×N2OGWP
Where:
N2ODirect=TotaldirectsoilN2Oemissionforparcelofland(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
ERp =Practice‐scaledemissionrateforlandparcel(metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
A =Areaofparcelofland(ha)
N2OMW =RatioofmolecularweightsofN2OtoN2O‐N =44/28(metrictonsN2O(metrictonsN2O‐N)‐1)
N2OGWP =GlobalwarmingpotentialforN2O(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsN2O)‐1)
![Page 62: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/62.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-62
aAdifferencearisesintheERbestimationofPRPmanureNinputandtheactualPRPmanureNinputbecauseatypicalrateofNinputwasassumedintheDAYCENTandDNDCsimulationsfortheERbcalculation(SeeTextbox3‐1andAppendix3‐A).bEmissionfactorsfromdeKleinetal.(2006).
Inthisequation,thebaseemissionrate(ERb)variesbytheamountofnitrogeninputtothesoil.TheratemayalsovaryfordifferentcropandgrazinglandsystemsbyLRRtocapturevariationinclimate,andbytextureclassinordertorepresenttheinfluenceofsoilheterogeneityonN2Oemissions.MoreinformationaboutbaseemissionratesisgiveninTextbox3‐1.
Practice‐basedemissionscalingfactors(0to1)areusedtoadjusttheportionoftheemissionrateassociatedwithslowreleasefertilizers(Ssr),nitrificationinhibitors(Sinh),andpasture/range/paddock(PRP)manurenitrogenadditions(Sprp,cps).Theslow‐releasefertilizer,
Equation3‐9:Practice‐Scaled SoilN2OEmissionRateforMineralSoils
ERp=[ERb+(ΔNprp*EFprp)]x{1+[Ssrx(Nsr/Ni)]}x{1+[Sinhx(Ninb/Ni)]}x(1+Still)x{1–[Nresidr/(Ni+Nresidr)]}
Where:
ERp =Practice‐scaledemissionrateforlandparcel(metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
ERb =Baseemissionrateforcroporgrazinglandthatvariesbasedonnitrogeninputratefrommineralfertilizer,organicamendments,residues,andadditionalmineralizationwithland‐usechangeortillagechange
(metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
ΔNprp =DifferenceinPRPmanureNexcretionabetweenthePRPmanureNexcretionbasedonentityactivitydata(NPRPe)andPRPmanureNexcretionforthebaseemissionrate(NPRPb)(metrictonsN)
=NPRPe‐NPRPb
EFprp =EmissionfactorforPRPmanureNinputtosoils,0.02metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1(metrictonsN)‐1forcattle,poultryandswine,and0.01metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonsN)‐1forotherlivestockb
Ni =Nitrogeninputs,includingmineralfertilizer,organicamendments,PRPmanureN,residues,andSOMmineralization(SeeEquation3‐11)
(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)Ssr =Scalingfactorforslow‐releasefertilizers,0wherenoeffect(dimensionless)
Nsr =Nitrogeninslow‐releasenitrogenfertilizerappliedtotheparcelofland (metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Sinh =Scalingfactorfornitrificationinhibitors,0wherenoeffect(dimensionless)
Ninh =Nitrogeninnitrogenfertilizerwithinhibitorappliedtotheparcelofland (metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Still =Scalingfactorforno‐tillage,0exceptforNT(dimensionless)
Nresidr =Nremovedthroughcollection,grazing,harvestingorburningofabovegroundresidues(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1).EstimateusingEquation3‐10forresultsgeneratedwithDAYCENTandDNDCmodelswiththeexceptionofhaycrops.NocalculationisneededforresultsgeneratedbytheIPCCmethodorforresultsassociatedwithhaycropsgeneratedbyDAYCENTandDNDC(setvalueto0).
![Page 63: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/63.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-63
nitrificationinhibitorandPRPmanurescalingfactorsareweightedsothattheireffectisonlyontheamountofnitrogeninfluencedbythesepracticesrelativetotheentirepoolofnitrogen(i.e.,theamountofslow‐releasefertilizer,fertilizerwithnitrificationinhibitororPRPmanurenitrogenaddedtothesoil).Incontrast,scalingfactorsfortillage(Still)areusedtoscaletheentireemissionrateundertheassumptionthatthispracticeinfluencestheentirepoolofmineralnitrogeninputs(i.e.,Ni).
Table3‐9:ScalingFactorsforNitrogenManagementPractices
ManagementPracticeNitrogen Management
FactorFactor(ProportionalChangeinEmissions) Source
Slow‐releasefertilizeruse Ssr ‐0.21(‐0.12to‐0.30) SeeAppendix3‐AManurenitrogendirectlydepositedonpasture/range/paddock
Sprp,cps +0.5(0.33to0.67) IPCC(2006)
Nitrificationinhibitoruse Sinh–semiarid/aridclimate ‐0.38(‐0.21to‐0.51) SeeAppendix3‐ANitrificationinhibitoruse Sinh–mesic/wetclimate ‐0.40(‐0.24to‐0.52) SeeAppendix3‐A
TillageStill–semiarid/aridclimate(<10yearsfollowingno‐till
adoption)0.38(0.04to0.72)
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
TillageStill–semiarid/aridclimate(≥10yearsfollowingno‐till
adoption)‐0.33(‐0.16to‐0.5)
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
Equation3‐10:AbovegroundResidueN Removal
ForCrops:
Nresidr=[((Ydm/HI)–Ydm)xRr)xNa]
ForGrazingForage:
Nresidr=[Ydmx(Fr+Rr)xNa]
Where:
Nresidr=Nremovedthroughcollection,grazing,harvestingorburningofabovegroundresidues(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Ydm =Cropharvestorforageyield,correctedformoisturecontent (metrictonsbiomassha‐1year‐1) =YxDM
Y =Cropharvestortotalforageyield(metrictonsbiomassha‐1year‐1)
DM =Drymattercontentofharvestedbiomass(dimensionless)
HI =HarvestIndex(dimensionless)
Fr =Proportionofliveforageremovedbygrazinganimals(dimensionless)
Rr =Proportionofcrop/forageresidueremovedduetoharvest,burningorgrazing(dimensionless)
Na =Nitrogenfractionofabovegroundresiduebiomassforthecroporforage (metrictonsN(metrictonsbiomass)‐1)
![Page 64: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/64.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-64
ManagementPracticeNitrogen Management
FactorFactor(ProportionalChangeinEmissions)
Source
TillageStill–mesic/wetclimate
(<10yearsfollowingno‐tilladoption)
‐0.015(‐0.16to0.16)vanKesseletal.(2012),
Sixetal.(2004)
TillageStill–mesic/wetclimate
(≥10yearsfollowingno‐tilladoption)
‐0.09(‐0.19to0.01) vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
Note:SeeAppendix3‐AforfurtherexplanationonthepracticesincludedinthesoilN2Omethodandthesourcesofdatathatwereusedtoderivethebaseemissionratesandscalingfactorsforthemanagementpractices.
![Page 65: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/65.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-65
Textbox3‐1:BaseEmissionRateforDirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils
Thebaseemissionrateisacroporgrazinglandspecificestimatethatvariesbasedonthetotalmineralnitrogeninputtothesoil.Therearetwomethodsusedtoestimatethebaseemissionrate.Thefirstmethodusesacombinationofprocess‐basedmodelingandmeasurementdatatoestimatesN2Obaseemissionratesbylandresourceregion,majorcroptype,andsoiltextureclass.ThesecondmethodusesthedefaultIPCCemissionfactorofonepercent(deKleinetal.,2006),multiplyingthisvaluebythetotalnitrogeninput(SeeEquation3‐11)toestimatethebaseemissionrate.Thesecondapproachisusedforcropsthatarenotincludedintheprocess‐basedmodelinganalysis.
Theremainderofthisboxdescribesthefirstmethod.Theequationforthefirstmethod,combiningthemodelingandmeasurementdata,isgivenbelow:
ERb=ER0+(EFtypical+(SEF×ΔNf))×Nf
ERb =Baseemissionrate(metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
ER0 =Emissionratemodeledat0levelofnitrogeninput(Nt=0) (metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
EFtypical =Emissionfactorforthetypicalfertilizationrate(metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonsN)‐1) =(ERtypical–ER0)/Ntf
ERtypical=Emissionrateforthetypicalcasemodeled(metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1)
SEF =BaseEFscalar; forΔNf>zero:SEF=0.0274forallnon‐grasslandcrops,
SEF=0.117forgrasslands; forΔNf<zero(lessthanorthesameastypicalfertilizerrates):SEF=0; ((metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonsN)‐2)hayear)
ΔNf =Nf‐Ntf(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Nf =Actualnitrogenfertilizerrate,includingsyntheticandorganic(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Ntf =Typicalnitrogenfertilizerrate(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Process‐basedmodelswereusedtosimulateN2OemissionsatthetypicalnitrogenfertilizationrateformajorcommoditycropsaccordingtotheUSDAAgriculturalResourceManagementSurveydata(ERtypical),inadditiontoazerorateapplication(ER0).TheN2Oemissionatthetypicalrateoffertilizationformajorcommoditycropsareproducedforcoarse,medium,andfinetexturedsoilsineachlandresourceregion.Theemissionfactor(EFtypical)forfertilizationratesgreaterthanthetypicalrateforthecroporgrassarescaledaccordingtothetrendinmeasuredsoilN2Odataacrossarangeoffertilizationratesbasedonexperimentaldata.ThechangeintheemissionfactorbetweenthetypicalnitrogenfertilizationrateandahigherratewasaveragedtoderiveanemissionfactorscalarorrateofchangeperunitofadditionalN.Thescalarismultipliedbytheadditionalnitrogentoderiveanadjustmenttotheemissionfactor(SEF×ΔNf)thatisthenaddedtotheemissionfactorderivedforthetypicalfertilizerrate(EFtypical).NoscalingisdoneforthecasewhereΔNf≤zero,i.e.,wherethefertilizationrateisequaltoorlessthanthetypicalrateofnitrogenapplication.InthiscaseSEF=0suchthatSEF×ΔNf=0.Theresultingemissionfactorismultipliedbytheactualfertilizerrate(Nf)andaddedtotheemissionrateatthe0levelofnitrogenfertilization(ER0)toderivethebaseemissionrate(ERb).
![Page 66: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/66.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-66
Nitrogeninputsareestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
aTheapproachforestimatingnitrogenmineralizationinputsisconsistentwiththeU.S.NationalInventory(U.S.EPA,2013).bPasture/Range/Paddock(PRP)manureNisatermutilizedbytheIPCC(deKleinetal.,2006)fortheNexcreteddirectlyontolandbylivestock,andthemanureisnotcollectedormanaged.ThetotalPRPmanureNisestimatedwithmethodsfromChapter5,andassumedtobesplitwith50%oftheNinurineand50%oftheNinsolids.
ThetotalNmineralizationisestimatedfromtheDAYCENTmineralsoilCmethodinaggregateformanureamendments(Nman),compost(Ncom),residues(Nres),soilorganicmatter(Nsmin)andsolidsassociatedwithPRPmanure,andisusedtoapproximatetheseNinputsinEquation3‐11.ThisapproachcreatesalinkagebetweenthemineralsoilCmethod(SeeSection3.5.3.2)andtheN2Omethod,ensuringconsistencyintreatmentofN.IninstanceswherecropscannotbeestimatedbytheDAYCENTmineralsoilCmethod,themethodfromtheIPCCguidelines(Aaldeetal.,2006)canbeusedtoestimatetheNinputsfrommineralizationwiththeexceptionofNsmin,whichissetto0(SeeAppendix3‐B).
OrganicSoils:ThemethodfororganicsoilsincludesHistosolsandsoilsthathavehighorganicmattercontentanddevelopedundersaturated,anaerobicconditionsforatleastpartoftheyear,whichincludesHistels,Historthels,Histoturbels.Themethodassumesthatthereisasignificantorganichorizoninthesoil,andtherefore,majorinputsofnitrogenarefromoxidationoforganicmatterratherthanexternalinputsfromsyntheticandorganicfertilizers.Iftheseassumptionsarenottrue,thentheentityshouldusethemineralsoilmethodtoestimatetheN2Oemissions.TotaldirectN2Oemissionsfromdrainedorganicsoilsareestimatedforindividualparcelsofland(i.e.,fields)withthefollowingequation:
Equation3‐11:NitrogenInputsa
Ni=Nsfert+Nman+Ncomp+Nresid+Nsmin+Nprp
Where:
Ni =Nitrogeninputs,includingmineralfertilizer,organicamendments,PRPmanureN,residues,andSOMmineralization
(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Nsfert =Nitrogeninsyntheticfertilizerappliedtoaparcelofland (metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Nman =Nitrogenmineralizationfrommanureamendments(orsewagesludge)appliedtoaparcelofland(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Ncomp =Nitrogenmineralizationfromcompostappliedtoaparcelofland (metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Nresid =Nitrogenmineralizationfromcropandcovercropresiduesaboveandbelowgroundthatareleftontheparceloflandfollowingsenescence(i.e.,notcollected,grazed,orburned)(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)
Nsmin=NitrogeninputsfromsoilorganicmattermineralizationasestimatedbytheDAYCENTmineralsoilCmethod(SeeSection3.5.3.2)(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1).Valuesetto0forcropsthatarenotestimatedwiththeDAYCENTmineralsoilCmethod.
Nprp =Nitrogeninurineandmineralizationfromsolidsassociatedwithmanureinpasture/range/paddock(PRP)(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)b
![Page 67: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/67.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-67
IndirectN2OEmissions:ThemethodtoestimateindirectN2OemissionsformineralsoilshasbeenadoptedfromtheapproachdevelopedbyIPCC(deKleinetal.,2006).ThefollowingequationisusedtoestimatethetotalindirectN2Oemissionsassociatedwithnitrogenvolatilizationandnitrogenleachingandrunofffromthelandparcel:
Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimatetheindirectemissionsassociatedwithnitrogenvolatilizationfromthelandparcel:
Equation3‐12:DirectN2OEmissionsfromDrainageofOrganicSoils(Histosols)
N2OORGANIC=AOS×EROS
Where:
N2OORGANIC =DirectsoilN2Oemissionfromdrainageoforganicsoils (metrictonsN2O‐Nyear‐1)
Aos =Areaoforganicsoilsdrainedonaparcelofland(ha)
EROS =EmissionrateforcroppedHistosols, IPCCTier1EROS=0.008metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1
Equation3‐13:TotalIndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils
N2OIndirect=(N2OVol+N2OLeach)×N2OMW×N2OGWP
Where:
N2OIndirect=IndirectsoilN2Oemission(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
N2OVol =N2Oemittedbyecosystemreceivingvolatilizednitrogen (metrictonsN2O‐Nyear‐1)
N2OLeach =N2Oemittedbyecosystemreceivingleachedandrunoffnitrogen (metrictonsN2O‐Nyear‐1)
N2OMW =RatioofmolecularweightsofN2OtoN2O‐N=44/28 (metrictonsN2O(metrictonsN2O‐N)‐1)
N2OGWP =GlobalwarmingpotentialforN2O(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsN2O)‐1)
![Page 68: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/68.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-68
TheIPCCdefaultsareusedforFRSNandFRON.
ThefollowingequationisusedtoestimatetheindirectN2Oemissionsassociatedwithleachingoroverlandflowofreactivenitrogenthatistransportedfromthelandparcel(i.e.,field):
Thefractionofnitrogenthatisleachedfromaprofilewillvarydependingonthelevelofprecipitationandirrigationwaterappliedinthefield.Inlandparcels(i.e.,fields)wheretheprecipitationplusirrigationwaterinputislessthan80percentofthepotentialevapotranspiration,nitrogenleachingandrunoffareconsiderednegligibleandnoindirectN2Oemissionsareestimated(U.S.EPA,2011).IPCCdefaultfractionsareusedforEFleachandFRleachwherenocovercropsarepresent.Wherewintercovercropsprecedethecashcrop,FRleachisfurtheradjustedtoaccountforcovercropeffectsonnitrateleaching.Inameta‐analysisof36geographicallydistributedfield
Equation3‐14:IndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils—Volatilization
N2OVol=[(FSN×FRSN)+(FON×FRON)]×EFVOL
Where:
N2OVol =IndirectsoilN2Oemittedbyecosystemreceivingvolatilizednitrogen (metrictonsN2O‐Nyear‐1)
FSN =Syntheticnitrogenfertilizerapplied(metrictonsNyear‐1)
FRSN =FractionofNSNthatvolatilizesasNH3andNOx.IPCCdefaultTier1=0.10 (metrictonsN(metrictonNsfert)‐1)
FON =Nitrogenfertilizerappliedoforganicoriginincludingmanure,sewagesludge,compostandotherorganicamendments(metrictonsNyear‐1)
FRON =FractionorproportionofFONthatvolatilizesasNH3andNOx.IPCCdefaultTier1=0.2(metrictonsN(metrictonNON)‐1)
EFVOL =EmissionfactorforvolatilizednitrogenorproportionofnitrogenvolatilizedasNH3andNOxthatistransformedtoN2Oinreceivingecosystem;IPCCTier1EF=0.01(metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonN)‐1)
Equation3‐15:IndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils—LeachingandRunoff
N2Oleach=(Ni×FRleach)×EFleach
Where:
N2Oleach =IndirectsoilN2Oemittedbyecosystemreceivingleachedandrunoffnitrogen(metrictonsN2O‐Nyear‐1)
Ni =Nitrogeninputs,includingmineralfertilizer,organicamendments,PRPmanureN,residues,andSOMmineralization(metrictonsNha‐1year‐1)(SeeEquation3‐11)
FRleach =FractionorproportionofNithatleachesorrunsoff.IPCCdefaultTier1=0.30excepta)whereirrigation+precipitationislessthan80%ofpotentialevapotranspiration(metrictonsN(metrictonN)‐1)FRleach=0;andb)croppingsystemswithleguminousornon‐leguminouswintercovercrops,forleguminouscovercrops,FRleach=0.18,andfornon‐leguminouscovercrops,FRleach=0.09.
EFleach =EmissionfactorforleachedandrunoffnitrogenorproportionofleachedandrunoffnitrogenthatistransformedtoN2Oinreceivingecosystem;IPCCTier1EF
=0.0075(metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonN)‐1)
![Page 69: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/69.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-69
studies,Tonittoetal.(2006)founda40percentand70percentreductioninnitrateleachingwiththeuseoflegumeandnon‐legumecovercrops,respectively.Accordingly,FRleach,isreducedto0.18forlegumecovercrops(0.3×(1‐0.4);or18%oftotalnitrogeninputs)and0.09fornon‐legumecovercrops(0.3×(1‐0.7);orninepercentoftotalnitrogeninputs).
3.5.4.3 ActivityData
Calculatingemissionsrequiresthefollowingactivitydataforcroplands:
Areaoflandparcel(i.e.,field); Prior‐yearcroptype,drymatteryields,andresidue‐yieldratiostocalculatecropresidue
nitrogeninput,includingcovercrop(ifpresent); Residuemanagement,includingamountharvested,burned,grazed,orleftinthefield; Syntheticfertilizertype(chemicalformulation)andcoatings(ifpresent); Syntheticandorganicfertilizerapplicationrate,applicationmethod(broadcast,banded,or
injected,includingdepthofinjection),timingofapplication(s); Typeofnitrificationinhibitorapplications(ifused); Tillageimplements,datesofoperation,andnumberofpassesineachoperation(whichcan
beusedtodeterminetillageintensitywiththeSTIRModel),(USDANRCS,2008); Irrigationmethod,applicationrateandtimingofapplications; Totaldrymatteryieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymatteryear‐1),drymattercontentofyield,
andharvestindex;and Covercroptypes,planting,andharvestingdates(ifapplicable).
Themethodforgrazinglandrequiresthefollowingmanagementactivitydata:
Areaoflandparcel(i.e.,field); Prior‐yeargrasstypeanddrymatterproductiontocalculategrassnitrogeninput; Syntheticfertilizertype(chemicalformulation)andcoatings(ifpresent); Organicamendmenttypesandtiming; Syntheticandorganicamendmentapplicationrate,applicationmethod(broadcast,banded,
orinjected,includingdepthofinjection),timingofapplication(s); Pasture/range/paddock(PRP)Nexcreteddirectlyontolandbylivestock(i.e.,manurethat
isnotmanaged); Typeofnitrificationinhibitorapplications(ifused); Tillageimplements,datesofoperation,andnumberofpassesineachoperationwhichcan
beusedtodeterminetillageintensitywiththeSTIRModel,(USDANRCS,2008); Irrigationmethod,applicationrate,andtimingofapplications; Periodsofgrazingduringtheyear; Animaltype,class,andsizeusedforgrazing; Stockingratesandmethods;and Totalyieldofmeat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1)ormilk(kgfluidmilkyear‐1).
Cropyieldsareprovidedbytheentityforthecropsystem,orpeakforageamountsforgrazingsystems.Insomeyears,theentitymaynotharvestthecropduetodrought,pestoutbreaks,orotherreasonsforcropfailure.Inthosecases,theentityshouldprovidetheaverageyieldthattheyhaveharvestedinthepastfiveyears,andanapproximatepercentageofcropgrowththatoccurredpriortocropfailure.Theyieldisestimatedbasedonmultiplyingtheaveragecropyieldbythepercentageofcropgrowthobtainedpriortofailure.
Tocalculatetheamountofsyntheticfertilizernitrogenappliedtosoils,thetypeoffertilizerappliedanditsnitrogencontentarerequired.Table3‐10providesnitrogencontentinformationforcommontypesofsyntheticfertilizers.
![Page 70: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/70.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-70
Pasture/range/paddock(PRP)manureNinputistheNexcreteddirectlyontolandbylivestock,andthemanureisnotcollectedormanaged(deKleinetal.,2006).TheamountofPRPmanureNisestimatedwiththelivestockmethods(SeeChapter5),andassumedtobesplitwith50%oftheNinurineandtheother50%oftheNinsolids.
3.5.4.4 AncillaryData
AncillarydataforestimatingdirectsoilN2Oemissionsfrommineralsoilsincludelandresourceregion,soiltexture,andclimatevariables.Landresourceregioncanbeidentifiedbasedonthegeographiccoordinatesofthefield.SoildataareavailablefromnationaldatasetssuchasSSURGO(SoilSurveyStaff,2011),andaveragegrowingseasonprecipitationandevapotranspirationdataareavailablefromnationalweatherdatasetssuchasPRISM(Dalyetal.,2008).Thesedataareusedbythemodelstodeterminebaseemissionrates.
3.5.4.5 ModelOutput
N2Oemissionsareexpressedbothasthequantityofemissionsandasemissionsintensity—emissionsperunityield,e.g.,gN2OperMggrainoranimalproduct.Reducingtheemissionsintensitycanbeassumedtoavoidemissionsfromindirectland‐usechange.Incontrast,iftheemissionsintensityincreasesduetoalossofyield,thenthereispotentialforadditionallandtobeconvertedintoagriculturetomakeupforayieldloss.
3.5.4.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
TheprimarylimitationofN2Oestimationmodelsisthattheydependonsurrogatemeasuresthatwillnotallowfluxesforaparticularlocationortimetobepredictedprecisely.Nevertheless,whileitmaybedecades,ifever,beforeannualratesofN2Oemissionsfromaspecificfieldcanbemeasuredwithgreatcertaintyandforlowcost,averageestimatesforsimilarcroppingsystemsandlandscapeswillconvergeasestimatesaggregatetolargerareas.
Table3‐10:NitrogenFractionofCommonSyntheticFertilizers(percentbyweight)
SyntheticFertilizer %NAmmoniumnitrate(NH4NO3) 33.5%Ammoniumnitratelimestone 20.5%Ammoniumsulfate 20.75%Anhydrousammonia 82%Aquaammonia 22.5%Calciumcyanamide(CaCN2) 21%Calciumammonianitrate 27.0%Diammoniumphosphate 18%Monoammoniumphosphate 11%Potassiumnitrate(KNO3) 13%Sodiumnitrate(NaNO3) 16%UreaCO(NH2)2 45%Source:Fertilizer101(2011).
Equation3‐16:SoilN2OEmissionsIntensity
EIN2O=(N2ODirect+N2OIndirect)/Y
Where:
EIN2O =N2Oemissionsintensity (metrictonsCO2‐eqpermetrictondrymattercropyieldorkgcarcassorkgfluid
milk)
N2ODirect =TotaldirectsoilN2Oemission(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)(SeeEquation3‐8)
N2OIndirect=TotalindirectsoilN2Oemission(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)(SeeEquation3‐13)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1),ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyieldyear‐1)
![Page 71: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/71.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-71
Limitationsinthemethodalsooccurdueto:
Lackofknowledgeofhowdifferentpracticesaffectfluxesinsomeregionsandcroppingsystems.
LackofknowledgeabouthowsomeofthemanagementpracticesinteractwitheachotherandwithsoilandclimatefactorstoaffectthefundamentalprocessesdrivingN2Oemissions—e.g.,nitrification,denitrification,gasdiffusion,etc.—andincorporationoftheseeffectsintoprocessmodels.
Limitednumberofdatasetscurrentlyavailabletotesttheefficacyofpracticestomitigatefluxesandtoevaluateprocess‐basedmodels.
Limitednumberofdatasetswithmorethantwofertilizerratestoestimatethescalarsforemissionfactorsassociatedwiththebaseemissionrates,particularlythepossibilityfornon‐linearscalars.
ThemineralsoilsmethodassumesaonepercentemissionfactorforindirectN2Oemissionsfromvolatilizednitrogenand0.75percentemissionfactorforleachedNO3‐.However,thereisevidencethattheEFforNO3‐leachingvariesfrom0.75%,dependingonthetypeofwaterway(Beaulieuetal.,2011)anditisalsolikelythatthesoilN2Oemissionsfromatmosphericdepositionofnitrogenwillvarydependingonthenitrogenstatusofthereceivingecosystem.
Thefractionofnitrogenthatisvolatilized(assumedtobe10percentforinorganicnitrogensourcesand20percentfororganicnitrogensourcesinEquation3‐15)isveryuncertain.Likewise,thefractionofnitrogenthatisleachedfromaprofileorrunsoffishighlyuncertain(assumedtobe30percentofallnitrogensourcesexceptwhereprecipitationplusirrigationislessthan80percentofpotentialevapotranspiration;U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,2011).Experimentssuggestthatgrossgeneralizationsarenotvalidandthatmanypracticescanreducebothvolatilizednitrogenandthenitrogenthatislostbyleachingandrunoff.9
ClimatechangewillaffectmodeloutputinsofarasbaselineN2Oestimatesaresimulatedforanygivenlocationusingtemperatureandprecipitationdistributionsforthepast30years.Expectedchangesintemperature,precipitation,andextremeeventssuchasdroughts,floods,andheatwaveswilladdfurtheruncertaintytoestimatesofallN2Oemissionsandpotentiallyinteractwithscalingfactors.Cropnitrogenmanagementmayfurtherchangewithclimatechange(Robertson,2013).
UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.UncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentityTable3‐11providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionstoestimateuncertaintyinthedirectandindirectsoilN2Oemissions.DataarenotshownforDNDCandDAYCENToutputthataredelineatedbyLRR,soiltype,andclimate.
9TheIPCCfactorsassumethatthemaximumabovegroundnitrogenrecoverybycropsis50to60percent.However,ratesofnitrogenrecoverycanbesignificantlyhigherwithbestpractices.
![Page 72: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/72.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-72
Table3‐11:AvailableUncertaintyDataforDirectandIndirectN2OEmissions
ParameterEstimatedValue Units
EffectiveLowerLimit
EffectiveUpperLimit
Distribution DataSource
TypicaldirectN2Oemissionrateand0‐levelinputratefromprocess‐basedmodel
NS Various NS NSMultiple
distributionsDAYCENT,DNDC
Scalingfactorforslow‐releasefertilizers
‐0.21ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.30 ‐0.12 Normal Appendix3‐A
ScalingfactorforPRPmanureN
+0.5ProportionalChangeinEmissions
0.33 0.67 NormalAppendix3‐
A
Scalingfactornitrificationinhibitors–semi‐arid/aridclimate
‐0.38ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.51 ‐0.21 Normal Appendix3‐A
Scalingfactornitrificationinhibitors–mesicclimate
‐0.40ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.52 ‐0.24 NormalAppendix3‐
A
Scalingfactorforno‐till,semi‐arid/aridclimate,<10years
0.38ProportionalChangeinEmissions
0.04 0.72 Normal
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
Scalingfactorforno‐till,semi‐arid/aridclimate,≥10years
‐0.33ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.5 ‐0.16 Normal
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
Scalingfactorforno‐till,mesic/wetclimate,<10years
‐0.015
ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.16 0.16 Normal
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
Scalingfactorforno‐till,mesic/wetclimate,≥10years
‐0.09ProportionalChangeinEmissions
‐0.19 0.01 Normal
vanKesseletal.(2012),Sixetal.(2004)
BaseEFscalar–croplandfornon‐grasslandcrops
0.0274
(metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonsN)‐2)ha
year
NormalAppendix3‐
A
BaseEFscalar–forgrasslands 0.117
(metrictonsN2O‐N(metrictonsN)‐2)ha
year
NormalAppendix3‐
A
EmissionrateforcroppedHistosols 0.008
metrictonsN2O‐Nha‐1year‐1
0.002 0.024 Uniform IPCC(2006)
Fractionofsyntheticnitrogen(NSN)thatvolatilizesasNH3andNOx
0.1metrictonsN(metrictonNsfert)‐1
0.03 0.3 Uniform IPCC(2006)
![Page 73: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/73.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-73
ParameterEstimatedValue Units
EffectiveLowerLimit
EffectiveUpperLimit
Distribution DataSource
Fractionofnitrogeninorganicamendments(FON)thatvolatilizesasNH3andNOx
0.2metrictonsN(metrictonNON)‐1
0.05 0.5 Uniform IPCC(2006)
EmissionfactorforvolatilizednitrogenasNH3andNOxthatistransformedtoN2O.
0.01metrictonsN2O‐N(metric
tonN)‐10.002 0.05 Uniform IPCC(2006)
FractionofNtthatleachesorrunsoffexceptinsystemswithcovercrops
0.3metrictonsN(metrictonN)‐1 0.1 0.8 Uniform IPCC(2006)
FractionofNtthatleachesorrunsoffwithaleguminouscovercrop
0.18 metrictonsN(metrictonN)‐1
0.14 0.26 Log‐Normal Tonittoetal.(2006)
FractionofNtthatleachesorrunsoffwithnon‐leguminouscovercrop
0.09metrictonsN(metrictonN)‐1
0.06 0.15 Log‐NormalTonittoetal.(2006)
EmissionfactorforleachedandrunoffnitrogenthatistransformedtoN2O
0.0075metrictonsN(metrictonN)‐1 0.0005 0.025 Uniform IPCC(2006)
NS=NotShown.Dataarenotshownforparametersthathave100’sto1000’sofvalues(denotedasNS).Dataareprovidedinsupplementarymaterialavailableonline.
![Page 74: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/74.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-74
3.5.5 MethaneUptakebySoils
3.5.5.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
TherearenoagronomicpracticesknowntoenhanceCH4uptake(oxidation)incroplands,otherthaninwetlandsconvertedtofloodedrice(discussedinSection3.2.2).Agronomicactivityuniversallyreducesmethanotrophyinarablesoilsby70percentormore(Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000).RecoveryofCH4oxidationuponabandonmentfromagricultureisslow,probablytaking50to100yearsforthedevelopmentofeven50percentofformer(original)rates(Levineetal.,2011).NorecoveryhasbeendocumentedforCRPgrasslandsorperennialbiofuelcropstodate.TherearecurrentlynomodelsforquantifyingCH4oxidationrecoveryotherthanrateofreversiontonaturalvegetation,sothisisaTier3methodasdefinedbytheIPCC.
3.5.5.2 DescriptionofMethod
Themodelisbasedonaveragevaluesformethaneoxidationinnaturalvegetation—whethergrassland,coniferousforest,ordeciduousforest—attenuatedbycurrentlandusepractices.AveragevaluesarefromthedatasetusedbyDelGrossoetal.(2000a),whoreportedaveragefluxes(±standarddeviation)fortemperateandtropicalgrasslandsoilsof3.2±1.9kgCH4ha‐1year‐1;forconiferousforestsoils,2.8±1.4kgCH4ha‐1year‐1;andfordeciduousforestsoils,11.8±5kgCH4ha‐1year‐1.Managementreducespotential(historic)oxidationto30percentoforiginalratesbasedonavailabledata(DelGrossoetal.,2000a;Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000)asnotedinSections3.2.3.3and3.3.2.3.Recoveryofoxidationisassumedtooccurovertheperiodrequiredforecologicalsuccessiontorestoreoriginalvegetation(DelGrossoetal.,2000a;Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000),whichisapproximatedat100yearsafterabandonmentfromagricultureorforestharvest.Recoveryisassumedtooccuratalinearrate(Smithetal.,2000)suchthatsuccessionalforestsandgrasslandswillconsumeCH4ataratethatisbetween30and100percentoftheoriginaloxidationcapacitybetweentheinitialyearofabandonmentuntilyear100.Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimatemethaneoxidationforalandparcel:
MethodforEstimatingMethaneUptakebySoil
Methaneuptakebysoilusesanequationbasedonaveragevaluesformethaneoxidationinnaturalvegetation—whethergrassland,coniferousforest,ordeciduousforest—attenuatedbycurrentlandusepractices.
AnnualaverageCH4oxidationfluxesarefromthedatasetusedbyDelGrossoetal.(2000a)whoreviewedaveragefluxesfromgrasslandandagriculturalsoils,coniferousforestsoils,anddeciduousforestsoils.Managementreducespotential(historic)oxidationto30percentoforiginalratesbasedonavailabledata(DelGrossoetal.,2000a;Mosieretal.,1991;Robertsonetal.,2000;Smithetal.,2000).KuchlerpotentialvegetationmapscanbeusedtodeterminethenaturalvegetationacrosstheUnitedStatesiftheentitydoesnothaveinformationforlandparcelsinoperation.
ThisnewlydevelopedmethodologymakesuseofrecentU.S.‐basedresearchthatisnotaddressedbyIPCCortheU.S.Inventory.Themethodincorporatesentityspecificannualdatasuchascurrentmanagementofthelandparcel,cultivationforcropproduction,grazingactivity,recentlyharvestedforests,orfertilizedgrasslandsorforests.
![Page 75: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/75.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-75
3.5.5.3 ActivityData
Thismethodrequireslanduseandtypeofvegetationforthepast80years.KuchlerpotentialvegetationmapscanbeusedtodeterminethenaturalvegetationacrosstheUnitedStates(grassland,coniferousforest,ordeciduousforest)iftheentitydoesnothavethisinformationforlandparcelsintheoperation.Theentitywillneedtoidentifyifthecurrentmanagementofthelandparcelincludescultivationforcropproduction,grazingingrasslands,recentlyharvestedforests,orfertilizedgrasslandsorforests.Assumingtheparceloflandisnotundercultivation,fertilized,grazedgrasslands,orrecentlyharvestedforest,theentitywillneedtoprovidethetimesincethelandhasbeenmanagedwithoneofthesepractices.
3.5.5.4 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataarerequiredforthismethod.
3.5.5.5 ModelOutput
ThemodelprovidesavaluefordiminishedCH4oxidationcapacity.ThechangeinCH4oxidationcapacitywillbenegative,andsothereisnopotentialforincreasedCH4oxidationwiththismethod.Unlikeothermethodsinthissection,theemissionsintensityisnotrelevantforthismethod.
3.5.5.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
Lackofprecisioninknowledgeofpriorlanduse. UncertaintiesassociatedwithestimatingCH4oxidationratespriortoconversion(PCH4in
Equation3‐17).Inareviewofavailabledata,DelGrossoetal.(2000a)notedannualCH4
oxidationratesof<1.8kgCH4ha‐1year‐1forgrasslandandagriculturalsoils,1.4to4.1kgCH4ha‐1year‐1forconiferousandtropicalforestsoils,and5.3to12kgCH4ha‐1year‐1fordeciduousforestsoils.
Equation3‐17:Methane(CH4)Oxidation
CH4SoilOxidation=(PCH4×AF)×SF×A×CH4GWP
Where:
CH4SoilOxidation=CH4oxidationinsoils(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
PCH4 =PotentialCH4oxidationbasedonhistoricnaturalvegetation;grasslands=3.2;coniferousforests=2.8,deciduousforests=11.8(kgCH4ha‐1year‐1)
AF =CH4oxidationattenuationfactor;croplandincludingset‐aside(CRP)grassland,grazingland,andfertilizedorrecentlyharvestedforests=0.30;naturalvegetation,0‐100yearsafterabandonmentofagriculturalproductionortimberharvest=0.3+(0.007×yearssinceabandonment);>100yearspost‐managementorneverusedforagriculturalmanagementortimberharvest=1.0
SF =Scalingfactor,1/1000(metrictonskg‐1)
A =Area(ha)
CH4GWP =GlobalwarmingpotentialofCH4(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsCH4)‐1)
![Page 76: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/76.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-76
Uncertaintyassociatedwiththeattenuationfactor.Inareviewoftemperateregioncomparisonsofpairedsitesinnaturalvegetationvs.agriculturalmanagement,Smithetal.(2000)foundthatagriculturalconversiontocroplandorpasturereducedoxidationby71percentonaverage.
UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity,althoughthismaynotbethecaseifthereislimitedknowledgeaboutland‐usechange.Table3‐12providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionsassociatedwithestimatinguncertaintyinmethaneoxidation.
Table3‐12AvailableUncertaintyDataforMethaneOxidation
ParameterEstimatedValue
EffectiveLowerLimit
EffectiveUpperLimit
Distribution DataSource
CH4oxidationratespriortoconversion(PCH4)grasslands(kgCH4ha‐1year‐1)
3.2 0 6.9 NormalDelGrossoetal.(2000a)
CH4oxidationratespriortoconversion(PCH4)coniferousforests(kgCH4ha‐1year‐1)
2.8 0.1 5.5 Normal DelGrossoetal.(2000a)
CH4oxidationratespriortoconversion(PCH4)deciduousForests(kgCH4ha‐1year‐1)
11.8 1.9 21.6 Normal DelGrossoetal.(2000a)
CH4oxidationattenuationfactor:croplandincludingset‐aside(CRP)grassland,grazingland,andfertilizedorrecentlyharvestedforests
0.30 0.07 1 Log‐NormalSmithetal.(2000)
CH4oxidationattenuationfactor:naturalvegetation,0‐100yearsafterabandonmentofagriculturalproductionortimberharvest
0.3+(0.007×yearssince
abandonment)
0.07+(0.007×yearssince
abandonment)
1 Log‐NormalSmithetal.(2000)
CH4oxidationattenuationfactor:>100yearspost‐managementorneverusedforagriculturalmanagementortimberharvest
1 0.07 1 Log‐Normal Smithetal.(2000)
![Page 77: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/77.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-77
3.5.6 MethaneandNitrousOxidefromFloodedRiceCultivation
3.5.6.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
ThereareanumberofpossibilitiesforestimatingGHGemissionsfromfloodedricesystems.ProcessbasedmodelsarebeingdevelopedtoquantifyGHGemissions,suchastheDNDC(e.g.,Zhangetal.,2011)andDAYCENTmodels(Chengetal.,2013).While,thesemodelshavebeenevaluatedforvariousregionsandcountriesinAsia,theyhavenotbeensufficientlyevaluatedforU.S.ricesystems,whicharesignificantlydifferentfromthosefoundinAsia(establishmentpractices,residuemanagement,watermanagement,andvarieties).Therefore,theselectedmethodisbasedontheIPCCTier1methodology.WhiletheIPCCmethodologyhasalsobeenlargelydevelopedfromAsianricestudies,itismoretransparentanduncertaintiescanbederivedintheemissionsestimates.Itisanticipatedthattheprocess‐basedmodelsmaybefurthertestedandcalibratedinthenearfutureforU.S.conditionsandpossiblyusedinafutureversionofthesemethods.
SeveralmanagementpracticeshavethepotentialtoinfluenceCH4andN2Oemissionsfromfloodedricesystems.However,therearecurrentlynotenoughdataavailabletoquantitativelyaccountfor(orestablishscalingfactorsfor)theeffectsofallofthesemanagementpractices.Thereissufficientinformationtoaccountfortheinfluenceofwatermanagement,residuemanagement,andorganicamendmentsonCH4emissionsfromfloodedrice(Lascoetal.,2006;Yanetal.,2005).
3.5.6.2 DescriptionofMethod
Methane:Themethodologyassumesabaselineemissionfactoror“typical”dailyrateatwhichCH4isproducedperunitoflandarea.Thisbaselinefactorrepresentsfieldsthatarecontinuouslyfloodedduringthecultivationperiod,notfloodedatallduringthe180dayspriortocultivation,andreceivenoorganicamendments.Differencesbetweenthebaselinescenarioandotherscenariosareaccountedforbytheuseofscalingfactorsthatareusedtoadjustthebaselineemissionfactorfor
MethodforEstimatingMethaneandN2OEmissionsfromRiceCultivation
IPCCequationsdevelopedbyLascoetal.(2006)forCH4anddeKleinetal.(2006)forN2O.‐ ThebaselineemissionfactorortypicaldailyrateatwhichCH4isproducedper
unitoflandarearepresentsfieldsthatarecontinuouslyfloodedduringthecultivationperiod,notfloodedatallduringthe180dayspriortocultivation,andreceivenoorganicamendments.Differencesbetweenthebaselinecontinuouslyfloodedfieldswithoutorganicamendmentsareaccountedforbyscalingfactors(e.g.,waterregimeadjustments(pre‐andduringthecultivationperiod),ororganicamendments).CH4scalingfactorstoaccountforwaterregimesandorganicamendmentscomefromLascoetal.(2006).
‐ N2OemissionfactorsrelyonLascoetal.(2006),andthescalingfactortoaccountfordrainageeffectscomesfromAkiyamaetal.(2005;USDA,2011).
ThismethodusestheIPCC(2006)equationswiththeadditionofascalingfactorforestimatingN2Oemissionsfromdrainage(Akiyamaetal.,2005;U.S.EPA,2011).ThemethodformethaneemissionsusesentityspecificseasonalparceldataasinputintotheIPCCequation.
Thismethodwaschosentominimizeuncertainty.Processmodelswereconsidered,butnotchosenforthismethodduetoaneedforfurtherresearchonU.S.ricecultivationconditionsandpractices.
![Page 78: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/78.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-78
theeffectsofwatermanagement(occurringbothbeforeandduringthecultivationperiod)andtheamountoforganicamendments.TherateatwhichCH4isemitteddependsonwaterflooding/drainageregimesandonratesandtypesoforganicamendmentsappliedtothesoil.Assuch,scalingfactorsforabroadrangeofscenariosareprovidedwiththismethodology.Thefactorsaredifferentiatedbyhydrologicalcontext(e.g.,irrigated,rainfed,upland—allricefieldsintheUnitedStatesareirrigated),cultivationperiodfloodingregime(e.g.,continuous,multipleaeration),timesincelastflooding(priortocultivation;e.g.,over180days,under30days)andtypeoforganicamendment(e.g.,compost,farmyardmanure).
ThefollowingequationhasbeenadoptedfromthemethodologydevelopedbytheIPCCtoestimateCH4emissionsfromalandparcel(Lascoetal.,2006):
Thedailyemissionfactorisestimatedbasedontheconditions(i,j,k,etc.)thatinfluenceCH4emissionsforfloodedriceproduction,includingtheecosystemtype,waterregime,andorganicamendmentrate.Asmoredatabecomeavailable,additionalconditionsthatinfluenceCH4emissionsmaybeadded.The“i"intheequationsbelowrepresentsthespecificscenarioor“otherconditions”thatcansignificantlyinfluenceCH4emissionsonaparcel.Inthefuture,additionalscenarioswithfactorsthataffectCH4emissionsmaybeincludedastherelationshipbetweentheseconditionsbecomesclear.Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimatethedailyemissionfactorforalandparcel:
Equation3‐18:Flooded RiceMethaneEmissions
CH4Rice=CH4GWP×Σijk(EFijkxtijkxAijkx10‐3)
Where:
CH4Rice =Annualmethaneemissionsfromricecultivation(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
EFijk =Adailyemissionfactorfori,j,andkconditions(kgCH4ha‐1day‐1)
tijk =Cultivationperiodofricefori,j,andkconditions(days)
Aijk =Annualharvestedareaofricefori,j,andkconditions(hayear‐1)
CH4GWP =GlobalwarmingpotentialforCH4(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsCH4)‐1)
i,j,andk =Representdifferentecosystems,waterregimes,typeandamountoforganicamendments,soiltype,ricecultivar,sulfatecontainingamendments,andotherconditionsunderwhichCH4emissionsfromricemayvary.
![Page 79: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/79.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-79
Thescalingfactorfororganicamendmentstoalandparcelisestimatedusingthefollowingequation:
ThescalingfactorsforEquation3‐19andEquation3‐20arefromLascoetal.(2006)andshownbelow.
Table3‐13:RiceWaterRegimeEmissionScalingFactors(DuringCultivationPeriod)
WaterRegimeDuringtheCultivationPeriod(assumesirrigated) SFwContinuouslyflooded 1Intermittentlyflooded–singleaeration 0.6Intermittentlyflooded–multipleaeration 0.52Source:Lascoetal.(2006),Table5.12.
Table3‐14:RiceWaterRegimeEmissionScalingFactors(BeforeCultivationPeriod)
WaterRegimeBeforetheCultivationPeriod SFpNonfloodedpre‐season<180days 1Nonfloodedpre‐season>180days 0.68Floodedpre‐season>30days 1.9Source:Lascoetal.(2006),Table5.13.
Equation3‐19:Flooded RiceMethaneEmissionFactor
EFi=EFcxSFwxSFpxSFoxSFs,r
Where:
EFi=adjusteddailyemissionfactorforaparticularharvestedarea(kgCH4ha‐1day‐1)
EFc=baselineemissionfactorforcontinuouslyfloodedfieldswithoutorganicamendments(kgCH4ha‐1day‐1)
SFw=scalingfactortoaccountforthedifferencesinwaterregimeduringthecultivationperiod(fromLascoetal.2006,Table5.12)(unitless)
SFp=scalingfactortoaccountforthedifferencesinwaterregimeinthepre‐seasonbeforethecultivationperiod(fromLascoetal.2006,Equation5.3andTable5.14)(unitless)
SFo=scalingfactorshouldvaryforbothtypeandamountoforganicamendmentapplied(Equation3‐20)(unitless)
SFs,r=scalingfactorforsoiltype,ricecultivar,etc.,ifavailable
Equation3‐20:OrganicAmendmentsScalingFactor
SFo=(1+(ROAixCFOAi))0.59
Where:
SFo =scalingfactorforbothtypeandamountoforganicamendment
ROAi=rateofapplicationoforganicamendment(s)(metrictonsha‐1)
CFOAi =conversionfactorfororganicamendments(fromLascoetal.2006,Table5.14)(unitless)
![Page 80: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/80.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-80
Table3‐15:RiceOrganicAmendmentEmissionScalingFactors;adaptedfromLascoetal.(2006)
OrganicAmendments CFOAStrawincorporatedshortly(<30days)beforecultivation 1Strawincorporatedlong(>30days)beforecultivation 0.29Compost 0.05Farmyardmanure 0.14Greenmanure 0.50Source:Lascoetal.(2006),Table5.14.
SoilN2O:TheIPCCmethodology(deKleinetal.,2006)hasbeenadaptedtoestimatedirectN2Oemissionsfromricefields.Theemissionfactorforricesoilsaccountsfornitrogenadditionsfrommineralfertilizers,organicamendments,andcropresidues.Notethataneffectofnitrogenmineralizedfrommineralsoilasaresultoflossofsoilcarbonisnotincludedinthisequation.Floodedricecultivationleadstominimallossesofsoilcarbonduetoperiodicflooding,whichisthedefaultassumptionwiththeIPCCmethod(Lascoetal.,2006),andthereforeitisnotnecessarytoincludetheeffectofenhancednitrogenmineralizationfromlossofsoilC.
ThefollowingequationisusedtoestimatethesoilN2Oemissionsfromaparcelofland:
TheemissionfactorandSFDfactorsarebasedonresearchconductedbyAkiyamaetal.(2005).TheIPCC(2006)doesnotaccountfordifferencesinwatermanagement,andusesanemissionfactorof0.3,butAkiyamaetal.(2005)providefurtherdisaggregationoftheemissionfactorsbasedonwatermanagement.Therefore,theselectedemissionfactorvalueis0.0022basedonAkiyamaetal.(2005),andthescalingfactorsare0forcontinuouslyfloodedriceand0.59foraeratedsystems(i.e.,drainageeventsduringthegrowingseason).
IndirectN2OEmissions:ForindirectN2Oemissionsfromfloodedrice,thesamemethodisusedasdescribedinSection3.5.4.2,byapplyingEquation3‐13,TotalIndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils;Equation3‐14,IndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils—Volatilization;andEquation3‐15,IndirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils—LeachingandRunoff.Inthelatter
Equation3‐21:DirectSoilN2OEmissionsfromfloodedRice
N2ORice=Nt×EF×(1+SFD)×N2OMW×N2OGWP
Where:
N2ORice=DirectemissionsofN2Ofromsoilsinfloodedriceproductionsystems(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
Nt =Totalnitrogeninputsfromallagronomicsources:mineralfertilizer,organicamendments,residues,andadditionalmineralizationfromland‐usechangeortillagechange(metrictonsNyear‐1)
EF =EmissionfactororproportionofNttransformedtoN2O(kgN2O‐N(kgN)‐1)
SFD =Scalingfactortoaccountfordrainageeffects;0forcontinuouslyflooded(dimensionless)
N2OMW=RatioofmolecularweightsofN2OtoN2O‐N=44/28(metrictonsN2O(metrictonsN2O‐N)‐1)
N2OGWP=GlobalwarmingpotentialforN2O(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsN2O)‐1)
![Page 81: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/81.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-81
twoequations,usetheIPCCdefaultfractionsforFRSN,FRON,andFRleach,whichareprovidedintheequationboxes.
3.5.6.3 ActivityData
Theactivityandrelateddatarequirementsforthismethodinclude:
Harvestedarea(ha); Cultivationperiodindays; Watermanagementpracticesthroughouttheyear(e.g.,aerationornot); Organicmatteramendment(includingresidue)rate; OrganicfertilizerN; Fertilizernitrogenmanagement(rate); Typeoffertilizer(s)applied(qualitative); CropresidueN;and Cropyield,metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1.
3.5.6.4 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataareneededforthismethod.
3.5.6.5 ModelOutput
ModeloutputisthecombinedemissionsofCH4andN2OinCO2equivalents,expressedonanareabasis.TheintensityofCH4emissionsandnitrousoxide(i.e.,emissionsperunitoflandareacultivated)isrelatedtothequantityofcropsgrownandcanbeestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
3.5.6.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
Thismethodhasseverallimitationsthatwillpotentiallycreatebiasorimprecisionintheresults.Currently,scalingfactorsaccountonlyforwaterandorganicmattermanagementanddonotaccountforothermitigationoptions.Asindicatedearlierthereareothermanagementopportunitiesthatmayreduceemissions,butfurtherresearchisrequiredintheseareas.Baselineemissionsarehighlyvariable,butthismethodologyprovidesonlyonefactorvaluerepresentingthebaselineemissions.Inaddition,themethodologyassumesaperiodofdrainage;however,drainevents(eventhoseofsimilarduration)canvarymarkedlybasedonsoilandclimaticconditions,fromdryandcrackingonthesurfacetosaturatedattheendofadrainageevent.Theinfluenceofdrainageonthesoilsaturationisnotaddressedwiththecurrentmethod.Inaddition,thereiscurrentlyinsufficientinformationtodevelopamethodfortheuseofsulfurproductsasamendments;futureguidancemaybeupdatedwithamethodforthispractice.
Equation3‐22:FloodedRiceCombinedMethaneandNitrousOxideEmissionsIntensity
EI=(CH4Rice+N2ORice)/Y
Where:
EI =Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2‐eqpermetrictonsdrymattercropyield)
CH4Rice=Annualmethaneemissionsfromricecultivation(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
N2ORice=DirectemissionsofN2Ofromsoilsinfloodedriceproductionsystems(metrictonsCO2‐eq‐year‐1)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1)
![Page 82: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/82.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-82
CH4emissionsaretheresultofanumberofinteractingbiologicalprocesses,whichbynaturevaryspatiallyandtemporally.Thegreatestamountofuncertaintyisthebaselineemissionfactor.Whenusingthismethodology,theemissionfactorisanaverageemissionfactorforcontinuouslyfloodedricesystemsthathavenotbeenfloodedthe180dayspriortocultivationandhavenotreceivedorganicamendments.InthecaseofCH4emissionsfromricecultivation,theuncertaintyrangesofTier1values(emissionandscalingfactors)areadopteddirectlyfromLascoetal.(2006).Rangesaredefinedasthestandarddeviationaboutthemean,indicatingtheuncertaintyassociatedwithagivendefaultvalueforthissourcecategory.
UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity.Table3‐16providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionsassociatedwithestimatinguncertaintyinmethaneandN2Oemissionsfromricecultivation.
Table3‐16:AvailableUncertaintyDataforMethane,DirectandIndirectN2OEmissions
MethanefromFloodedRiceCultivation
ParameterAbbreviation/
SymbolEstimatedValue
EffectiveLowerLimit
EffectiveUpperLimit
DistributionDataSource
Baselineemissionfactorforcontinuouslyfloodedfieldswithoutorganicamendments
EFc 1.3 0.8 2.2 UniformIPCC(2006)
Waterregimeduringthecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFwforcontinuouslyflooded
1 0.79 1.26 UniformIPCC(2006)
Waterregimeduringthecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFwforsingleaeration
0.6 0.46 0.8 UniformIPCC(2006)
Waterregimeduringthecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFwformultipleaerations
0.52 0.41 0.66 UniformIPCC(2006)
Waterregimebeforethecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFpfornon‐floodedpre‐season<180
days1 0.88 1.14 Uniform IPCC
(2006)
Waterregimebeforethecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFpfornon‐floodedpre‐season>180
days0.68 0.58 0.8 Uniform IPCC
(2006)
Waterregimebeforethecultivationperiod–Scalingfactor
SFpforfloodedpre‐season>30days
1.9 1.65 2.18 Uniform IPCC(2006)
Organicamendmentconversionfactor
CFOAiforstrawincorporationlessthan30daysbefore
cultivation
1 0.97 1.04 Uniform IPCC(2006)
![Page 83: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/83.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-83
MethanefromFloodedRiceCultivation (continued)
ParameterAbbreviation/
SymbolEstimatedValue
EffectiveLowerLimit
EffectiveUpperLimit Distribution
DataSource
Organicamendmentconversionfactor
CFOAiforstraw
incorporationmorethan30daysbeforecultivation
0.29 0.2 0.4 Uniform IPCC(2006)
Organicamendmentconversionfactor
CFOAiforcompost
0.05 0.01 0.08 UniformIPCC(2006)
Organicamendmentconversionfactor
CFOAiforfarmyardmanure 0.14 0.07 0.2 Uniform
IPCC(2006)
Organicamendmentconversionfactor
CFOAiforgreenmanure
0.5 0.3 0.6 Uniform IPCC(2006)
N2OfromFloodedRice
ParameterAbbreviation/
SymbolMean
RelativeUncertaintyLow(%)
RelativeUncertaintyHigh(%)
DistributionDataSource
EmissionfactororproportionofNttransformedtoN2O
EF 0.0022 0.24% 0.24% Normal Akiyamaetal.(2005)
Scalingfactortoaccountfordrainageeffects
SFDforaeratedsystems 0.59 0.35% 0.35% Normal
Akiyamaetal.(2005)
3.5.7 CO2fromLiming
3.5.7.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
AdditionoflimetosoilsistypicallythoughttogenerateCO2emissionstotheatmosphere(deKleinetal.,2006).However,prevailingconditionsinU.S.agriculturallandsleadtoCO2uptakebecausethemajorityoflimeisdissolvedinthepresenceofcarbonicacid(H2CO3).Therefore,theadditionoflimeleadstoacarbonsinkinthemajorityofU.S.croplandandgrazinglandsystems.Whetherlimingcontributestoasinkorsourcedependsonthepathwaysofdissolutionandratesofbicarbonateleaching.Theemissionsfactorprovidedinthisguidancehasbeenestimatedfroma
MethodforEstimatingCO2 EmissionsfromLiming
ThismethodusestheIPCCequation(deKleinetal.,2006)withU.S.specificemissionsfactors.
EntityspecificannualparceldataasinputintotheIPCCequation(e.g.,theamountoflime,crushedlimestone,ordolomiteappliedtosoils).
ThismethodwasselectedasitwastheonlyreadilyavailablemodelforestimatingCO2
emissionsfromliming.
![Page 84: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/84.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-84
reviewofexistingmodelsandmassbalanceanalysesconductedfortheapplicationoflimeintheUnitedStatesandisaTier2methodasdefinedbytheIPCC.
Sincecrushedlimestone(CaCO3)contains12percentC,anapplicationof1,000kgCaCO3places120kgConthesoilsurface.Itisassumedthattwo‐thirdsofthis(80kg)isacidifiedtoHCO3‐andleachedtotheoceanwhereitwillbesequesteredfordecadestocenturies(OhandRaymond,2006).Becausethistransferrepresentsamovementfromonelong‐termpool(geologicformations)toanother(ocean),thiscarbontransferdoesnotrepresentanetuptakeofCO2fromtheatmosphere.However,withthistransfer,thereis80kgCofatmosphericCO2uptakeintosoils.TheuptakeofCO2fromtheatmosphere,aftersubtractingtheone‐thirdofcarboninthelimethatisacidifieddirectlytoCO2(40kgC),yieldsatotalnetCO2uptakeof40kgCper1,000kgCaCO3applied.Thisresultsinacarboncoefficientoremissionfactorof40/1000=‐0.04kgCperkgCaCO3.Thisequatestoacarbonsink(40kgCsequestered/120kgC×100).DolomitecontainsonlyslightlymorecarbonthandoesCaCO3(13percentvs.12percent)sothefactorsareessentiallythesame.
Theemissionfactoriscountry‐specificbasedonarevisionoftheestimatesproposedinWestandMcBride(2005),whicharecurrentlyusedintheU.S.NationalGHGInventory(U.S.EPA,2011).TheunderlyingdifferencewiththeearlieremissionfactorfromWestandMcBride(2005)isthattherevisedvalueassumesthattheamountofbicarbonatecarriedintorivershasalongturnovertimeandisessentiallynotreturnedtotheatmosphereoverdecadaltocenturytimescales.
3.5.7.2 DescriptionofMethod
ThemodeltoestimateCO2emissionsfromliminghasbeenadaptedfrommethodsdevelopedbytheIPCC(deKleinetal.,2006),withrefinementintheemissionfactorsbasedonconditionsinU.S.agriculturallands.Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimateemissionsfromcarbonatelimeadditionstoalandparcel:
3.5.7.3 ActivityData
Themethodrequiresdataontheamountoflime(crushedlimestoneordolomite)appliedtosoils.
3.5.7.4 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataareneededinordertoapplythemethod.
Equation3‐23:ChangeinSoilCarbon StocksfromLimeApplication
ΔCLime=M×EF×CO2MW
Where:
ΔCLime =Annualchangeinsoilcarbonstocksfromlimeapplication(metrictonsCO2‐eq)
M =Annualapplicationoflimeascrushedlimestoneordolomite
(metrictonsofcrushedlimestoneordolomiteyear‐1)
EF =MetrictonCO2emissionspermetrictonoflime‐0.04
(metrictoncarbon(metrictonlime)‐1)
CO2MW =RatioofmolecularweightofCO2tocarbon(44/12)(metrictonsCO2(metrictonsC)‐1)
![Page 85: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/85.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-85
3.5.7.5 ModelOutput
Modeloutputisgeneratedonbothanabsolutequantityofemissionsandemissionsintensity.Thelatterisbasedontheamountofemissionsperunitofyieldforcropsincroplandsystemsorgrazingsystems.Theemissionsintensityisestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
Yieldsarebasedonthetotalamountofproductfromthelandmanagedwithlimeapplication.
3.5.7.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
LimitationsincludevariationinsoilcarbonemissionsduetosoilpHandrateofnitrogenfertilizerapplication,whichinfluencethechemicalpathwayoflimedissolution(Hamiltonetal.,2007;WestandMcBride,2005).Morespecifically,theEFwillnotaccuratelycapturetheresultoflimedissolutioninthepresenceofstrongernitricacid(HNO3),whichisproducedwhennitrifyingbacteriaconvertammonium(NH4+)basedfertilizerandothersourcesofNH4+tonitrate(NO3‐).
Uncertaintiesinthelimeemissionsmethodsincludeimprecisionatthefarmscale,becausethemethodofestimationisbasedonstream‐gaugedatathatarecollectedatthewatershedscale.UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity.Table3‐17providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionsassociatedwithCO2emissionspermetrictonoflimeapplied.
Table3‐17:AvailableUncertaintyDataforCO2fromLiming
Parameter MeanRelative
UncertaintyLow(%)
RelativeUncertaintyHigh(%)
Distribution DataSource
Emissionsfactor(metrictonCO2emissionspermetrictonoflime)
‐0.04 46% 46% NormalAdaptedfromWestand
McBride(2005)
Equation3‐24:EmissionsIntensityfromLimeApplication
EI=ΔCLime/Y
Where:
EI =Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2permetrictondrymattercropyield)
ΔCLime =Annualchangeinsoilcarbonstocksfromlimeapplication(metrictonsCO2)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1),ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyieldyear‐1)
![Page 86: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/86.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-86
3.5.8 Non‐CO2EmissionsfromBiomassBurning
3.5.8.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
Non‐CO2GHGemissionsfrombiomassburningincludeCH4andN2O.COandNOxarealsoemittedandareprecursorsthatarelaterconvertedintoGHGsfollowingadditionalreactions(i.e.,releaseofthesegasesleadstoGHGformation).CO2isalsoemittedbutnotaddressedforcropresiduesorgrasslandburningbecausethecarbonisreabsorbedfromtheatmosphereinnewgrowthofcropsorgrasseswithinanannualcycle.
Therehasbeenlimiteddevelopmentandtestingofprocess‐basedapproachesforestimatingnon‐CO2GHGemissionfrombiomassburning.Moreover,country‐specificdataarelimitedontheamountofnon‐CO2GHGemissions.Therefore,thisguidancehasadoptedtheIPCCTier1methodasdescribedbyAaldeetal.(2006).
3.5.8.2 DescriptionofMethod
Themodeltoestimatenon‐CO2GHGemissionsandprecursorshasbeenadaptedfrommethodsdevelopedbyIPCC(Aaldeetal.,2006).Thefollowingequationisusedtoestimateemissionsduetoburningbiomassonaparcelofland:
Combustionefficiency,asdefinedinIPCC(2006)combinestheproportionofbiomassthatisactuallyburnedinafirewiththeamountofcarbonreleasedasaproportionofthetotalcarbonintheburnedbiomass.Themassofthefuelcombustedincludesliveanddeadbiomass(i.e.,dead
MethodforEstimatingNon‐CO2 EmissionsfromBiomassBurning
ThemethodusestheIPCCequationandemissionfactorsdevelopedbyAaldeetal.(2006).
Entityspecificannualparceldata(e.g.,areaburnedforcroplandsandgrazingland;croptypeandharvestyielddata;residue‐yieldratios(Westetal.,2010);typeofforage,grazingarea,andamountofbiomassbeforethefireingrazinglandsthatareburned;andcombustionefficiency)areinputstotheIPCCequation.
Thismethodwasselectedasitwastheonlyreadilyavailablemodelforestimatingnon‐CO2emissionsfrombiomassburning.
Equation3‐25:GHGEmissionsfromBiomassBurning
GHGBiomassBurning=A×M×C×EF×10‐3×GHGGWP
Where:
GHGBiomassBurning=AnnualemissionsofGHGorprecursorduetobiomassburning(metrictonsofCO2‐eqyear‐1)
A =Areaburned(ha)
M =Massoffuelavailableforcombustion(metrictonsdrymatterha‐1year‐1)
C =Combustionefficiency,dimensionless
EF =Emissionfactor(gGHG(kgofburnedbiomass)‐1)
GHGGWP =GlobalwarmingpotentialforeachGHG(metrictonsCO2‐eq(metrictonsGHG)‐1)
![Page 87: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/87.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-87
biomassincludesplantresiduesingrazingandcroplandsystems)andisapproximatedforalandparcelwiththefollowingequation:
PeakabovegroundbiomassisestimatedwithEquation3‐3forcropsandgrassvegetation.Forcroplandsthatareburnedfollowingharvest,theresiduemassisestimatedbysubtractingtheharvestindex(HI)fromoneandconvertingtoapercentage,whichistheresidualbiomassleftinthefield.DefaultharvestindicesaregiveninTable3‐5.TheestimatedmassoffuelforgrazingsystemsbasedonEquation3‐3doesnotincludethedeadbiomass.Ifthereissignificantresiduallitteringrazingsystems,thenmultiplythemassoffuelbytwoasaconservativeestimateofthetotalliveanddeadbiomassonthelandparcel.Alternatively,entitiesmayenteranestimatefortheproportionofresiduallittermassrelativetothelivebiomass,insteadofusingtwo,whichdoublesthemassoffuel.AsummaryofemissionfactorsbylandusecategoryisprovidedinTable3‐18.
3.5.8.1 ActivityData
Thefollowingactivityandrelateddataareneededtoapplythemethod:
Areaburnedforcroplandsandgrazingland; Croptypeandharvestyielddataforcropsgrown
infieldswithresidueburningmanagement; Residue:yieldratios(optional); Typeofforage,grazingarea,andamountof
biomassbeforethefireingrazinglandsthatareburned;and
Combustionefficiency(optional).
Alistofdefaultcombustionefficienciesisprovidedforresiduesandforages(Table3‐19andTable3‐20),buttheentitycanprovidevaluespecifictotheiroperation.Defaultdrymattercontentsandresidue‐yieldratiosareprovidedinTable3‐5,butcanalsobeenteredbytheentityiftheinformationisavailable.
Table3‐18:EmissionFactorsforBiomassBurning
Land‐UseCategoryCO CH4 N2O NOx
(gkg‐1)
Grasslandburning 65 2.3 0.21 3.9
Croplandresidue 92 2.7 0.07 2.5
Forestbiomass(withconversiontocroplandorgrazinglands)
107 4.7 0.26 3.0
Source:Aaldeetal.(2006).
Table3‐19:DefaultCombustionEfficienciesforSelectedCrops
Crop CombustionEfficiency(C)
Corn 0.88x0.93=0.82Cotton 0.88x0.93=0.82Lentils 0.88x0.93=0.82Rice 0.88x0.93=0.82Soybeans 0.88x0.93=0.82Sugarcane 0.68x0.81=0.55Wheat 0.88x0.93=0.82Source:EPA(2013),Table6‐25.
Equation3‐26:MassofFuel
M=(Hpeak/C)×(D/100)
Where:
M =Massoffuelavailableforcombustion(metrictonsdrymatterha‐1year‐1)
Hpeak =Annualpeakabovegroundherbaceousbiomasscarbonstock(metrictonsCha‐1year‐1)
C =Carbonfractionofabovegroundbiomass(dimensionless)
D =Percentageofbiomasspresentatthestageofburningrelativetopeak(%)
![Page 88: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/88.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-88
Insomeyears,theentitymaynotharvestthecropduetodrought,pestoutbreaks,orotherreasonsforcropfailure.Inthosecases,theentityshouldprovidetheaverageyieldthatithasharvestedinthepast,andanapproximatepercentageofaveragecropgrowththatoccurredpriortoburning.Theyieldisestimatedbasedonmultiplyingtheaveragecropyieldbythepercentageofcropgrowthobtainedpriortoburning.
3.5.8.2 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataareneededinordertoapplythemethod.
3.5.8.3 ModelOutput
Modeloutputisgeneratedonbothanabsolutequantityofemissionsandemissionsintensity.Thelatterisbasedontheamountofemissionsperunitofyieldforcropsincroplandsystemsoranimalproductsingrazingsystems.Theemissionsintensityisestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
Yieldsarebasedonthetotalamountofproductfromthelandmanagedwithburning.
Table3‐20:DefaultCombustionEfficienciesforSelectVegetationTypes
VegetationTypeCombustionEfficiency(C)
BorealForest(all) 0.34Wildfire 0.40
Crownfire 0.43Surfacefire 0.15
Postloggingslashburn 0.33Landclearingfire 0.59
TemperateForest(all) 0.45Postloggingslashburn 0.62
Felledandburned(land‐clearingfire) 0.51Shrublands(all) 0.72
Shrubland(general) 0.95Calluna health 0.71
Fynbos 0.61Savannawoodlands(earlydryseasonburns)(all)
0.40
Savannawoodland(early) 0.22Savannaparkland(early) 0.73
Savannawoodlands(mid/latedryseasonburns)(all)
0.74
Savannawoodland(mid/late) 0.72Savannaparkland(mid/late) 0.82
Tropicalsavanna 0.73Othersavannawoodlands 0.68
Savannagrasslands(earlydryseasonburns)(all)
0.74
Tropical/sub‐tropicalgrassland 0.74SavannaGrasslands/Pastures(mid/latedryseasonburns)(all) 0.77
Tropical/sub‐tropicalgrassland 0.92Tropicalpasture 0.35
Savanna 0.86Source:Aaldeetal.(2006),Table2.4(C×M)andTable2.6(C)
Equation3‐27:BiomassBurningEmissionsIntensity
EI=GHGBiomassBurning/Y
Where:
EI =Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2permetrictondrymattercropyield,metrictonsCO2perkgcarcassyield,metrictonsCO2perkgfluidmilkyield)
GHGBiomassBurning=AnnualCO2equivalentemissionsfromburning(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1),ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyieldyear‐1)
![Page 89: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/89.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-89
3.5.8.4 LimitationsandUncertainty
Uncertaintyintheemissionestimatesisattributedtoimprecisionincarbonfractions,drymattercontents,harvestindices,combustionefficiencies,andtheemissionfactors.UncertaintiesinmodelparametersarecombinedusingaMonteCarlosimulationapproach.Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthecropyields,peakforage,andrelativeamountofcroporforagegrowthcomparedtothepeakproduction.However,thesevaluesarelikelytohavesomelevelofuncertainty,andmethodswillneedtoberefinedinthefuturetobetteraddresstheseuncertainties,particularlythemassoffuelingrazinglands.Table3‐21providestheprobabilitydistributionfunctionsforestimatinguncertaintyinnon‐CO2emissionsfrombiomassburning.
Table3‐21:AvailableUncertaintyDataforNon‐CO2EmissionsfromBiomassBurning
Parameter MeanRelative
UncertaintyLow(%)
RelativeUncertaintyHigh(%)
Distribution DataSource
CH4EFforgrassland(gCH4kg‐1)
2.3 8% 8% Normal IPCC(2006)
CH4EFforcropresidue(gCH4kg‐1)
2.7 50% 50% Normal IPCC(2006)
N2OEFforgrassland(gN20kg‐1)
0.21 93% 93% Normal IPCC(2006)
N2OEFforcropresidue(gN20kg‐1)
0.07 50% 50% Normal IPCC(2006)
Combustionefficiencyforshrublands
0.72 68% 68% Normal IPCC(2006)
Combustionefficiencyforgrasslandswithearlyseasonburns
0.74 50% 50% Normal IPCC(2006)
Combustionefficiencyforgrasslandswithmidtolateseasonburns
0.77 66% 66% Normal IPCC(2006)
Combustionefficiencyforsmallgrains
0.9 50% 50% NormalExpert
Assessmentbyauthors
Combustionefficiencyforlargegrainandothercropresidues
0.8 50% 50% NormalExpert
Assessmentbyauthors
CombustionefficiencyBorealforest(all) 0.34 102% 102% Normal IPCC(2006)
Wildfire 0.40 340% 340% Normal IPCC(2006)Crownfire 0.43 104% 104% Normal IPCC(2006)Surfacefire 0.15 96% 96% Normal IPCC(2006)
Postloggingslashburn 0.33 130% 130% Normal IPCC(2006)CombustionefficiencyTemperateforest(all) 0.45 51% 51% Normal IPCC(2006)
Postloggingslashburn 0.62 264% 264% Normal IPCC(2006)CombustionefficiencyShrublands(all)
0.72 147% 147% Normal IPCC(2006)
Callunahealth 0.71 121% 121% Normal IPCC(2006)Fynbos 0.61 195% 195% Normal IPCC(2006)
CombustionefficiencySavannawoodlands(earlydryseasonburns)(all)
0.40 93% 93% Normal IPCC(2006)
![Page 90: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/90.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-90
Parameter MeanRelative
UncertaintyLow(%)
RelativeUncertaintyHigh(%)
Distribution DataSource
CombustionefficiencySavannawoodlands(mid/latedryseasonburns)(all)
0.74 99% 99% Normal IPCC(2006)
Savannawoodland(mid/late)
0.72 270% 270% Normal IPCC(2006)
Tropicalsavanna 0.73 598% 598% Normal IPCC(2006)Othersavannawoodlands 0.68 931% 931% Normal IPCC(2006)CombustionefficiencySavannagrasslands(earlydryseasonburns)(all)
0.74 183% 183% Normal IPCC(2006)
Tropical/sub‐tropicalgrassland
0.74270% 270% Normal IPCC(2006)
Tropical/sub‐tropicalgrassland
0.92151% 151% Normal IPCC(2006)
Tropicalpasture 0.35 427% 427% Normal IPCC(2006)Savanna 0.86 85% 85% Normal IPCC(2006)
3.5.9 CO2fromUreaFertilizerApplications
3.5.9.1 RationaleforSelectedMethod
UreafertilizerapplicationtosoilscontributesCO2emissionstotheatmosphere.ThesourceoftheCO2thatisincorporatedintotheureaduringthefertilizerproductionprocessisfromfossilfuelsourcesintheU.S.fertilizerplants.TheCO2capturedduringtheproductionprocessisconsideredanemissionsremovalinthemanufacturer’sreportingsoitsreleasefollowingureafertilizationonsoilsisincludedinthefarm‐scaleentityreporting.IfmanufacturersdonotestimateCO2captureduringureaproductionandincludetherecapturedCO2asanemission,thereisnoneedforafarm‐scaleentitytoreportrelease.
TheTier1methodhasbeenadoptedfromtheIPCC(deKleinetal.,2006).Noothermethodshavebeendevelopedortestedsufficientlyforanoperationalsystem.
3.5.9.2 DescriptionofMethod
ThemodeltoestimateCO2emissionsfromureaapplicationhasbeenadoptedfromthemethodologydevelopedbytheIPCCandusestheIPCCdefaultemissionfactor(deKleinetal.,2006).ThefollowingequationisusedtoestimatetheCO2emissionfromalandparcelwhereurea‐basedfertilizershavebeenapplied:
MethodforEstimatingCO2 EmissionsfromUreaFertilizerApplication
ThismethodusesIPCCequationandemissionfactorsdevelopedbydeKleinetal.(2006). ThismethodusesentityspecificannualparceldataasinputintotheIPCCequation(e.g.,
theamountofureafertilizerappliedtosoils). ThismethodassumesthatthesourceofCO2usedtomanufactureureaisfossilfuelCO2
capturedduringNH3manufacture.
![Page 91: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/91.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-91
3.5.9.3 ActivityData
Thismethodrequiresdataontheamountofureafertilizerappliedtosoils.
3.5.9.4 AncillaryData
Noancillarydataareneededinordertoapplythemethod.
3.5.9.5 ModelOutput
Modeloutputisgeneratedonbothanabsolutequantityofemissionsandemissionsintensity.Thelatterisbasedontheamountofemissionsperunitofyieldforcropsincroplandsystemsoranimalproductsingrazingsystems.Theemissionsintensityisestimatedwiththefollowingequation:
Yieldsarebasedonthetotalamountofproductfromthelandmanagedwithureaapplication.
3.5.9.6 LimitationsandUncertainty
Urea(CO(NH2)2)isconvertedintoammoniumandCO2inthepresenceofwaterandtheenzymeurease.TheCO2willdissolveinwatertoformcarbonate,bicarbonate,andcarbonicacidasafunctionofsoilpHandtemperature.Someofthebicarbonatemaybetransferredtogroundwater,waterways,andeventuallytheocean,andthereforereducetheCO2emissionstotheatmosphere(deKleinetal.,2006;Hamiltonetal.,2007)).However,thereisinsufficientinformationavailabletoincludethispossibilityintheureamethod,soitisassumedthatanyincreaseinbicarbonatewillleadtoproductionofCO2.
Equation3‐28:CO2 EmissionsfromUreaFertilization
CUrea=M×EF×CO2MW
Where:
CUrea =Annualreleaseofcarbonfromureaaddedtosoil(metrictonsCO2‐eqyear‐1)
M =Annualamountofureafertilization(metrictonsureayear‐1)
EF =Emissionfactororproportionofcarboninurea,0.20 (metrictonC(metrictonurea)‐1)
CO2MW=RatioofmolecularweightofCO2tocarbon(44/12) (metrictonsCO2(metrictonsC)‐1)
Equation3‐29:EmissionsIntensityfromUreaFertilization
EIUrea=CUrea/Y
Where:
EIUrea=Emissionsintensity(metrictonsCO2permetrictondrymattercropyield,metrictonsCO2perkgcarcassyield,metrictonsCO2perkgfluidmilkyield)
CUrea =Annualchangeinsoilcarbonstocksduetoureaapplication(metrictonsCO2year‐1)
Y =Totalyieldofcrop(metrictonsdrymattercropyieldyear‐1),meat(kgcarcassyieldyear‐1),ormilkproduction(kgfluidmilkyieldyear‐1)
![Page 92: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/92.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-92
Uncertaintyisassumedtobeminorforthemanagementactivitydataprovidedbytheentity,althoughthismaynotbethecaseifthereislimitedknowledgeaboutlandusehistoryforindividualparcels.Uncertaintymayalsoexistintheemissionfactor,assumingthatsomeofthebicarbonateisnotconvertedtoCO2.However,themethodassumesallCO2isemittedbecauseuncertaintyestimatesarenotavailableforthisemissionfactor.Therefore,nouncertaintyisestimatedforthissourceofGHGemissionsbasedonthisconservativeassumptionthatallCO2isemitted.
3.6 SummaryofResearchGapsforCropandGrazingLandManagement
ThissectiondiscussesresearchgapsassociatedwithcroplandandgrazinglandmanagementimpactsonsoilcarbonstockchangesandGHGemissions.Thelistisnotnecessarilyexhaustive,buthighlightssomekeygapsthatwillneedfurtherresearchbeforethereissufficientevidenceforadditionalcriteriatobeincludedinthemethodology.Ingeneral,themajorityofpriorexperimentaleffortshavefocusedoncomponentsofGHGs,butfewstudieshavebeenconductedontotalGHGbudgetstoincludeCO2,N2O,andCH4incombination,whichisneededtoquantifyinteractingeffectsonthenetemissionsofthesegases(Liebigetal.,2010).Inaddition,limitedresearchhasbeenconductedtoaddresstheinfluenceofcatastrophicweathereventsonGHGemissions,suchasmajorfloods,tornadoes,andhurricanes.
CarbonStocks:10Thefollowingprocessesandpracticesrequirefurtherstudytoimprovethefundamentalunderstandingorfilldatagapsinthecarboninventorymethods.Inparticular,deficienciesinunderstandingcontinuetounderminethedevelopmentofrobustestimatesofnetGHGemissionsinrangelandsandpastures.Suchdeficienciesstemfromalackofmeasurementsacrossthemajorgrasslandecoregions,aswellaslimitationsassociatedwithbasicunderstandingofmechanisticprocessesrelatedtoGHGfluxes.Therearealsomajorgapswithrespecttoagroforestry,woodyplantencroachment,andperennialwoodycropsystems.
Moredataonallometricrelationshipsforagroforestry,woodyplantencroachment,andperennialwoodycropsystems,suchasorchards.
Improvedabilitytoquantifytheinfluenceofagroforestry,woodyplantencroachment,andperennialwoodycropsonsoilorganiccarbonstocks,includingoptimaldensityoftrees,thetypeoftrees,andthelandscapepositionofsilvopasturesystems.
Improvedmechanisticunderstandingandabilitytoquantifythefateofcarbonwithtransportandsedimentationfollowingerosionevents.
Fieldestimatesoftheamountofcarbonaddedtosoilsthroughdynamicreplacementonerodiblelands.
Improvedmechanisticunderstandingofcarbondynamicsinthesubsoilhorizons. Furtherstudyontheeffectofirrigationonplantproductionanddecompositiontoquantify
theneteffectonsoilorganiccarbonstocks. Furtherresearchonthevariationintypesandresidencetimesofbiocharamendments,in
additiontobiocharimpactonotherGHGemissions,primingofsoilorganicmatterdecomposition,andtheoverallphysicalbreakdownanddisintegrationofbiocharovertime(Jafféetal.,2013).
Dataonlong‐termresponsesofsoilorganiccarbontovariationinstockingrate,grazingmethod(i.e.,continuous,rotational,short‐durationrotational,andultra‐highstockingdensity),andvegetationcomposition(i.e.,forbandgrassmixtures,cool‐andwarm‐seasongrassmixtures,grassandlegumemixtures,grassandwoodymixtures,andplantarchitecturetypes),andwhethertheseresponsesaremediatedbydifferentsoilstypes,climaticconditions,botanicalcomposition,grazingmethodused,fertilizerregime,etc.
10Exceptagroforestrycarbonstockchanges,whicharecoveredlaterinthissection.
![Page 93: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/93.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-93
FurtherstudytoaddressmitigationofGHGsinaridrangelands,particularlyinshrublands,includinginteractionsbetweenmanagementandenvironmentalconditions(Ingrametal.,2008).Additionaldatacollectionandmodelimprovementarealsoneededinaridrangelands,asuncertaintyisextremelylargeforthesoilcarbonsequestrationestimatesassociatedwithreducedstockingratesandseedingoflegumes(Brownetal.,2010;Brown,2010).OurbasicknowledgeofcarbonsequestrationandGHGmitigationinaridandsemiaridenvironmentsislimited,andtheeffectofmanagementisrelativelyunderstudied.
Needforlife‐cycleassessmentofgrazingsystemswithparticularattentiontobalanceofsoilorganiccarbon,N2Oemissionsfromsoil,andCH4emissionsfromruminantsandsoil,dependingonstockingrate,stockingmethod,foragetypeassociatedwithqualityofintake,andenvironmentalconditionsofgrazingsystem.
DatafromadaptivemanagementapproachestoinformunderstandingofsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationandGHGemissionsunderdifferentgrazingmanagementstrategies.Thisapproachcouldhelpstrengthenconservation‐orientedprogramstoobtaingreaterimpactforreducingGHGemissionsandsequesteringsoilorganicC.
Additionalfieldexperimentsanddataonsoilcarbonemissionsresultingfromthecombinedapplicationoflimeandnitrogenfertilizers.
SoilNitrousOxideEmissions:Thefollowingpracticeshave,insomestudies,significantlyaffectedN2Oemissions,butrequireadditionalresearchinside‐by‐sidecomparisonstudiesacrossdifferentsoiltypesandclimate,especiallyforextensivelygrownrowcropsthatreceivehighlevelsofnitrogenfertilizers(cornandwheatinparticular):
EffectsofsplitordelayednitrogenapplicationsonloweringN2OfluxesandonincreasingNUEtoprovideequivalentyieldsatlowertotalnitrogeninput.
Capacityofspatiallyprecisefertilizerapplicationtechnology(variablerateapplicators)tolowerN2Ofluxes(bothdirectandindirect)andincreaseNUE.
Effectsofbandednitrogenfertilizerapplications,showninsomestudiestoincreaseNUEandinotherstoincreaseN2Oemissions.
ThegeneralizabilityofhigherN2OEFsandnitratelossatnitrogenfertilizerratesgreaterthancropneeds(i.e.,atratesgreaterthanthoserecommendedbyMaximumReturntoNitrogenapproaches).
ThegeneralizabilityofdifferentfertilizerformulationsonN2Oemissions,inparticularforureavs.anhydrousammoniavs.injectedsolutions.
Thegeneralizabilityofcoatedfertilizerssuchaspolymercoatedurea,ureaseinhibitors,biocharadditions,andnitrificationinhibitorsforloweringN2Oemissionsandnitrateloss.
MoreresearchontheresponsesofsoilN2Oemissionstovariationsinstockingrates,grazingmethods(continuous,rotational,short‐durationrotational,andultra‐highstockingdensity),andvegetationcomposition(forbandgrassmixtures,cool‐andwarm‐seasongrassmixtures,grassandlegumemixtures,grassandwoodymixtures,andplantarchitecturetypes),bothindividuallyandincombinations.
ThepotentialformobilewaterandsheltersourcesinpasturestoreduceN2Oemissionsbyallowingforamoreevendistributionofmanure.
InfluenceofcropresidueharvestingonN2Oemissions,aswellassoilorganiccarbonstocks,giventheinterestinusingcropresiduesasafeedstockforbioenergyproduction.
InfluenceofcovercropsonN2Oemissions,includingeffectsofplanttype(e.g.,legumevs.nonlegume)andresiduemanagement(e.g.,harvestedvs.incorporated).
InfluenceofmanureandcompostonN2Oemissionsinsofaraseffectsmaydifferfromsyntheticnitrogeninputswithrespecttorate,timing,placement,andformoforganicnitrogenadded(e.g.,liquidvs.drymanurevs.compostwithdifferentC:Nratios).
![Page 94: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/94.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-94
ImprovedquantificationofspatialandtemporalvariationofN2Oemissionsindifferentcroppingsystemsandlandscapestoprovideamoreaccurateassessmentofseasonalandannualemissionsacrosswholefields.
Improvedestimatesofindirectemissions,andinparticularthepercentageofnitrogenthatislostfromafieldthroughvolatilizationorleaching/runoff,andlaterconvertedtoN2Oindownstreamanddownwindecosystems.AdditionalstudyonpracticesthatcanreducenitratelossesaswellaspracticesthatcanreduceNH3andNOxlosses.
ResearchisalsoneededtoimprovemodelingandempiricalquantificationofsoilN2OemissionsinordertoprovideestimatesofN2Ofluxesthatintegrateacrossmultiplemanagementpracticessimultaneously:
FurtherdevelopmentandvalidationofquantitativesimulationmodelscapableofaccuratelypredictingN2Ofluxesinresponsetodifferingmanagementpractices,withparticularrespecttorate,timing,placement,andformulationofaddedfertilizers,bothsyntheticandorganic;tillagetypeandintensity;andresiduemanagement.
MoredataregardingseasonalandannualN2Oemissions,includingemissionsduringthenon‐growingseasonandinparticularwinterandfreeze‐thawperiods.
BetterknowledgeoffluxesacrossallLandResourceRegions(LRRs)concentratedespeciallyinthoseareasandcroppingandgrazedsystemsexpectedtocontributemosttolocalandregionalN2Ofluxes,withside‐by‐sidecomparisonsofdifferentmanagementpractices.
DevelopmentofstandardizedmethodologiesandcreationofnewtechnologiesforrapidassessmentofN2Ofluxesinthefield.
AnimprovedunderstandingofthesourcesofN2Oincroppedsoils(e.g.,nitrificationvs.denitrification)andconsequencesforfeedbacksamongadaptivemanagement,soilphysicalandbiologicalattributes,andSOCdynamics.
DevelopmentofasetofgeographicallystratifiedtestsitesatwhichfactorsknowntoaffectagronomicN2Oemissionscouldbetestedinthecontextofdifferentmanagementsystems.ThiswouldprovidearobustempiricaldatasetforestablishingTier2and3models.
FloodedRiceProductionEmissions:TheprimaryresearchgapisthelimitedamountofresearchconductedintheUnitedStatesonGHGfromricesystems.Therefore,mostofthecurrentconclusionsaboutmanagementinfluencesonriceCH4emissionsarebasedonAsianstudieswherericeistransplantedasopposedtodirectseeded.ThismaybeproblematicbecausewaterismanageddifferentlyinAsiantransplantedfloodedricesystemsduringtheestablishmentperiodthaninU.S.systems.Untilrecently,nostudiesevaluatedseasonalorannualN2OemissionsfromricesystemsintheUnitedStates(Adviento‐Borbeetal.,2007;Pittelkowetal.,2013).IntheUnitedStates,muchoftheresearchonGHGemissionscomesfromLouisiana,Texas,andCalifornia.Lindau’slabconductedonstationresearchinLouisianatoevaluateCH4emissions(e.g.,Lindauetal.,1995;Lindauetal.,1998).Sass’sgroupalsoevaluatedCH4emissionsonexperimentalstationsinTexas(e.g.,Huangetal.,1997;Sassetal.,1994).InCalifornia,variousresearchergroups(e.g.,Bossioetal.,1999;Fitzgeraldetal.,2000)havebeenconductingresearchbothonstationandoffstationandhaverecentlyalsoincludedN2Omeasurements(Adviento‐Borbeetal.,2007;Pittelkowetal.,2013).
ThefollowingpracticeshaveinsomestudiessignificantlyaffectedCH4orN2Oemissionsbutrequirefurtherside‐by‐sidecomparisonswithexperimentaldesignsacrossdifferentsoiltypesandclimateswithintheUnitedStates.
Watermanagementpractices(inparticularmidseasondrainsorintermittentirrigation)areoftensuggestedasviableoptionstomitigateCH4emissions.Whiledatasupportthisconclusion,thesemanagementpracticeshavenotbeenwidelytestedintheUnitedStates.In
![Page 95: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/95.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-95
studieswherethesoilhasbeendrainedduringtheseason,investigatorshavereporteddelayedcropmaturation(aproblemintemperateclimateswithrelativelyshortgrowingseasons),reducedyieldsandgrainquality,andincreasedweedanddiseasepressure.Therefore,althoughmidseasondrainageismentionedasamitigationoption,moreresearchisrequiredbeforeitisrecommendedforuseinU.S.ricesystems.
ReturningricestrawtosoiloftenresultsinincreasedCH4emissions,buttheremovalofstrawrequiresenergyandtime.Furthercompoundingtheproblemisthattherearerelativelyfewusesforricestraw.Theremovalofricestrawalsoremovesnutrientswhichwouldneedtobereplaced.Ofparticularconcernispotassium,asricestrawcontainsanaverageof1.4percentofpotassium.Therefore,itispossibletoremovemorethan100kg/haofpotassiumthroughremovalofricestraw,whichwillneedtobereplacedinordertomaintainasustainablecroppingsystem.
InCalifornia,farmerstypicallyincorporatericestrawandfloodtofacilitatestrawdecompositionduringthewinter.ThispracticeincreasesCH4emissionsfromricefieldsduringthewinterandthefollowinggrowingseason.However,ithasalsosignificantlyimprovedhabitatforoverwinteringwaterfowlinthePacificFlyway.Fitzgeraldetal.(2000)reportedthatuptohalfoftheannualCH4emissionsoccurredduringthewinterfallowperiodwhenstrawwasincorporatedandflooded.Recentstudiessuggestthat50percentmaybeahighestimateandthatfurtherresearchisneeded(Adviento‐Borbeetal.,2007;Pittelkowetal.,2013).
WhilemanystudieshaveshownvarietaldifferencesinhowmuchCH4isemitted,thesestudiesareallrelativelyoldandmanyofthevarietiesarenolongerwidelyused.Furtherresearchoncurrentvarietiesneedstobeconducted.
LimiteddataonnitrogenplacementsuggeststhatdeepplacementoffertilizerreducesCH4emissions,butmoreresearchisneededtoconfirmthefindings.
Side‐by‐sidecomparisonswithexperimentaldesignsareneededofwet‐anddry‐seededricetoevaluatetheirinfluenceonCH4andN2Oemissions.ThesearethetwomostcommonriceestablishmentpracticesintheUnitedStates.
SomestudiesfromChinasuggestthatmorecarbonissequesteredinricesystemsthaninupland(aerobic)systems,butthishasnotbeenevaluatedintheUnitedStates.
Agroforestry:Asufficientdatabasefordevelopingthemethodstoreadilymeasureand/ormodelthevariousGHGimpactsofagroforestryiscurrentlylacking.FullGHGmonitoringandaccountinginagroforestrywillrequireamixofmethodologiesfromamongtheGHGaccountingframeworksbecauseofthediversityinusesassociatedwithagroforestrysystems.Thefollowingresearchgapsarehighlighted.
Assessmentofapproachesforestimatingwoodybiomassinagroforestryplantings,whichincludescomparisonofexistingequationsandlookuptableswithagroforestry‐generatedvolumeandbiomassequationstodeterminebestapproachforestimatingcarboninthewoodybiomassofagroforestryplantings.
Developmentofeffectivestrategiesformeasuring/monitoringcarbonsequestrationandGHGemissionsinsoilandwoodycomponents.
EffectofdifferentspeciesmixturesandcombinationsofmanagementactivitiesonsoilcarbonsequestrationandminimizingtotalGHGemissions.
ImpactofmanagementoptionsandenvironmentinteractionsoncarbonsequestrationandtotalGHGemissionswithinagroforestrysystems.
Developmentoftoolsrelevanttotheinventory/measurement/estimationofthese“treesoutsideofforests.”Inaddition,testingthevalidityofcurrentcarbonaccountingtools(e.g.,DAYCENT,HOLOS)inprovidingaccurateestimatesofcarbonsequesteredinthewoodybiomassofagroforestryplantings.
![Page 96: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/96.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-96
Understandingsoilcarbondynamicsinagroforestrysystems,alongwiththeimpactofsoilerosion,transportanddepositiononcarbonstocks.
Developinginventorymethodologies(suchastheuseofLightDetectionandRanging)toestablishacost‐effectivenationalagroforestryinventorycompatibleforinclusionwithcurrentinventoriescontributingtoregional/nationalGHGassessments.
Developingstandardizedexperimentalprocedures,measurement,andmonitoringprotocols,suchasthosebeingdevelopedthroughtheGreenhouseGasReductionthroughAgriculturalCarbonEnhancementnetwork(GRACEnet)11toagroforestrypracticeswiththestandardizedmeasurementandmonitoringforagriculturalN2Oemissions.
MethaneOxidationinSoils:SoilCH4oxidationisknowntodecreaseby~70percentuponconversionoflongstandingnaturalvegetationtocropandpastureland(seeSection3.5.5).CH4oxidationratesforsoilsundernaturalvegetationarenotwellknownforallclimatesandsoils,soadditionalmeasurementswouldbeuseful.AswithN2O,thefurtherdevelopmentandvalidationofquantitativesimulationmodelscapableofaccuratelypredictingCH4fluxeswouldalsobehelpfulforbettergeneralizingeffectsandforfutureinclusionoffactorsthatmaybediscoveredtorestoreoxidationincroppedsoils.ThereisalsolimitedresearchontheeffectofgrazinglandmanagementonCH4oxidationalthoughvariationinstockingrates,grazingmethods,andassociatedpracticesmayhaveaninfluenceonthisprocess.
InorganicSoilCarbon:TheeffectofmanagementonsoilinorganiccarbondynamicsandexchangeofCO2withtheatmosphereisalsoinneedoffurtherresearch.ThefollowinglistisabriefsummaryofsomeofthekeygapsidentifiedforquantificationofGHGemissions:
Wheninorganiccarbonisaddedtosoilasagriculturallimeorasabreakdownproductofurea,partoftheinorganiccarbonbecomesbicarbonate.ImprovedunderstandingofthefateofthisbicarbonateindifferentsoilsandlandscapeswouldhelptobettercharacterizethepresenceandstrengthoftheresultingbicarbonateCO2sink.
ImprovedquantificationofemissionsoruptakeofatmosphericCO2withadditionofcarbonatelimestosoilswillrequiremethodstodeterminethedominanceofweatheringduetocarbonicacid(H2CO3)vs.thestrongernitricacid(HNO3)incroplandandgrazinglandsoils.
Improvedmechanisticunderstandingandquantificationofinorganiccarbondynamicsareneededinirrigatedsystems,aswellasinnonirrigatedsystems—particularlyinaridandsemiaridregions.
11GRACEnetisaresearchprograminitiatedbyUSDAAgriculturalResearchServiceto“identifyandfurtherdevelopagriculturalpracticesthatwillenhancecarbonsequestrationinsoils,promotesustainability,andprovideasoundscientificbasisforcarboncreditsandtradingprograms”(USDAARS,2013).
![Page 97: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/97.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-97
Appendix3‐A:SoilN2OModelingFrameworkSpecifications
SoilN2Oemissionsareestimatedusingacombinationofprocess‐basedmodeling,empiricalscalarsbasedonexperimentaldata,andscalingfactorsforpracticesinfluencingtheN2Oemissionsasrepresentedinthebaseemissionrates(Section3.5.4.1,Equations3‐8and3‐9,andTextbox3‐1).Thisappendixprovidesmoreinformationabouttheprocess‐basedmodels,inadditiontothederivationofempiricalscalarsandthepractice‐basedscalingfactors.
DAYCENTandDNDCmodelswereusedtoestimateN2Oemissionsforthetypicalfertilizerrateanda0‐levelnitrogenfertilizationrateassociatedwithmajorcropsineachUSDALRR.CropssimulatedarelistedinTable3‐A.1;baseemissionratesforothercrops(e.g.,sugarcane,millet,rye)wereestimatedusingtheTier1emissionfactor(onepercentofnitrogeninputs).Toestimateemissionfactorsfromthemodeloutput,theN2Oemissionsatthe0‐leveladditionwassubtractedfromtheN2Oemissionforthetypicalfertilizationrate.Thedifferencewasthendividedbythesyntheticagronomicnitrogeninputtoestimatetheemissionfactoratthetypicalrateoffertilization.ScalarswereusedtoscaletheN2Oemissionsforfertilizationratesthatweregreaterthanthetypicalrate.Thescalarswerederivedfromempiricaldatabasedonthechangeinemissionfactorsacrossarangeoffertilizationrates.SeeTextbox3‐1formoreinformationabouthowtheresultingemissionfactorswereusedtoestimatebaseemissionratesforthedirectsoilN2Omethod.
Meta‐analyseswereusedtoderivepractice‐basedscalingfactorsfromexperimentaldata.ThescalingfactorswereusedtoadjustthebaseemissionratesforspecificpracticesthatinfluencesoilN2Oemissions.Thescalingfactorsincludedtheeffectofnitrificationinhibitors(Sinh),slow‐releasefertilizers(SSR),pasture/range/paddockmanure(SPRP),andtillage(Still).TheresultingscalingfactorsareusedinEquation3‐9toscalethebaseemissionratesforlandparcelsmanagedwiththesepractices.
Figure3‐A.1providesanoverviewofthedecisionsandstepsinvolvedinestimatingN2Oemissionsfrommineralsoils.
![Page 98: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/98.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-98
Figure3‐A.1:DecisionTreeforEstimatingN2OEmissionsfromMineralSoils
![Page 99: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/99.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-99
3‐A.1DescriptionofProcess‐BasedModels
DAYCENT12isageneralterrestrialbiogeochemicalmodelthatsimulatescarbonandnitrogentransformationsinvolvedinprimaryproductivity,decompositionandnutrientdynamics(DelGrossoetal.,2000b;Partonetal.,2001).Themodelalsosimulatesheatandwaterfluxesverticallythroughthesoilprofile(one‐dimensional).Lateralflowofwaterisnotsimulatedexceptthatoverlandrunoffoccurswhenrainfalleventsofsufficientmagnitudeoccurgiventhepermeabilityofthesurfacesoillayer.Keysubmodelsincludeplantgrowthwithdynamiccarbonallocationamongplantcomponents,soilorganicmatterdecompositionandnutrientmineralization,andN2Oemissionsfromnitrificationanddenitrification.Plantgrowthiscontrolledbynutrientavailability,soilwaterandtemperature,andvegetationtypespecificparameterscontrollingmaximumplantgrowthrates,maximum/minimumC:Nratiosofbiomasscomponents,andphenology.Decompositionofsenescedplantmaterialandsoilorganicmatteriscontrolledbythequalityandquantityoflitterinputs,soiltexture,water,andtemperature.N2OemissionsarecontrolledbysoilNH4andNO3,watercontent,temperature,gasdiffusivity,andlabilecarbonavailability.Landmanagement/disturbanceeventssuchascultivation,waterandnutrientadditions,fire,andgrazing,canbereadilyimplementedinthemodel.ThemodelhasbeenappliedtosimulatesoilGHGfluxesatscalesrangingfromplotstoregionstotheglobe(DelGrossoetal.,2010;DelGrossoetal.,2005;DelGrossoetal.,2009).TheabilityofDAYCENTtosimulatecropyields,SOM,N2Oemissions,andNO3leachinghasbeentestedagainstavarietyoffieldexperimentsincroplandandgrasslandintheUnitedStates(DelGrossoetal.,2005;DelGrossoetal.,2008a;DelGrossoetal.,2008b).
DNDC13isaprocess‐basedbiogeochemicalmodelthatisusedtopredictplantgrowthandproduction,carbonandnitrogenbalance,andgenerationandemissionofsoil‐bornetracegasesby
12TheversionofDAYCENTcodedandparameterizedfortheU.S.NationalGHGinventory(U.S.EPA,2013)wasusedtoderiveexpectedbaseemissionrates.13DNDC9.5compiledonFeb.25,2013,wasusedtoderiveexpectedbaseemissionrates.
![Page 100: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/100.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-100
meansofsimulatingcarbonandnitrogendynamicsinnaturalandagriculturalecosystems(Lietal.,2000;Miehleetal.,2006;Stangetal.,2000)andforestedwetlands(Zhangetal.,2002).Themodelintegratesdecomposition,nitrification‐denitrification,photosynthesisandhydrothermalbalancewiththeecosystem.Thesecomponentsaremainlydrivenbyenvironmentalfactors,includingclimate,soil,vegetation,andmanagementpractices.ThemodelhasbeentestedandusedforestimatingGHGemissionsfromforestedecosystemsinawiderangeofclimaticregions,includingboreal,temperate,subtropical,andtropical(Kesiketal.,2006;Kieseetal.,2005;Kurbatovaetal.,2008;Lietal.,2004;Stangetal.,2000;Zhangetal.,2002),andsimilarlyforgrasslandsandcultivatedwetlands(Giltrapetal.,2010;Rafiqueetal.,2011).
Modelinputs,forbothmodels,includetheweatherdata,14soilcharacteristics,andmanagementdataforthesesimulations.Atotalof1,200samplesweredrawnforcroplandsitesimulationsandanother1,200samplesforgrasslandsitesimulations.Thesamplenumberwasoriginallydeterminedfromaplantoselectthreesoiltypesfrom20countiesdominatedbyagricultureineachof20LRRs(3x20x20=1,200).Theemissionratesthatwereproducedbybothmodelswillbeavailableonlineinsupplementarymaterialfiles.Anexampleoftheratesforcorn,winterwheat,andgrassaregiveninFigure3‐A.2.
Figure3‐A.2:ExampleofMedianBaseEmissionRatesforCorn,WinterWheat,andGrassProductioninLandResourceRegionswithCoarse,Medium,andFineTexturedSoils
Table3‐A.1providesthe2.5,50,and97.5percentilebaseemissionratesforeachcrop,LRR,andsoiltexturecombination.EmissionratesarekgN2O‐Nperhawhencropsarefertilizedattypicalnitrogenrates.
14ThemodelsusedDAYMETweatherforthecentroidofgrassland/croplandineachcounty.
![Page 101: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/101.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-101
Table3‐A.1BaseEmissionRate(kgN2O‐Nha‐1)PercentilesbyLandResourceRegion(LRR),Crop,andSoilTextureatTypicalNitrogenFertilizerRates
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
A Grass Coarse 0.02 0.56 5.28A Grass Medium 0.41 1.20 3.86A Grass Fine 0.49 1.34 5.30A Tomato Coarse 0.04 1.08 4.83A Tomato Medium 0.28 1.69 8.31A Tomato Fine 0.49 2.09 15.73A Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.03 0.61 3.53A Wheat,Spring Medium 0.16 1.00 2.87A Wheat,Spring Fine 0.40 1.32 3.50A Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.05 0.55 4.00A Wheat,Winter Medium 0.19 0.91 2.99A Wheat,Winter Fine 0.35 1.21 2.77B Grass Coarse 0.01 0.40 5.25B Grass Medium 0.02 0.45 5.41B Grass Fine 0.05 0.74 8.20B Pea Coarse 0.00 0.36 2.43B Pea Medium 0.00 0.61 3.80B Pea Fine 0.02 0.53 3.02B Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.00 0.49 2.71B Wheat,Spring Medium 0.01 0.80 4.43B Wheat,Spring Fine 0.04 0.87 3.56B Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.00 0.40 2.05B Wheat,Winter Medium 0.01 0.54 3.58B Wheat,Winter Fine 0.04 0.75 3.72C Alfalfa Coarse 0.01 0.58 0.99C Alfalfa Medium 0.01 0.66 1.60C Alfalfa Fine 0.00 0.86 2.25C Corn Coarse 0.21 0.78 3.00C Corn Medium 0.27 0.93 8.23C Corn Fine 0.60 1.60 12.96C Grass Coarse 0.05 0.32 1.17C Grass Medium 0.08 0.36 1.37C Grass Fine 0.07 0.42 1.16C Rice Coarse 0.04 0.63 1.34C Rice Medium 0.03 0.70 2.19C Rice Fine 0.02 0.95 7.50C Safflower Coarse 0.17 0.89 2.86C Safflower Medium 0.38 1.15 7.46C Safflower Fine 0.56 2.09 12.92C Sunflower Coarse 0.07 0.58 2.13C Sunflower Medium 0.15 0.73 6.45C Sunflower Fine 0.29 1.37 9.16C Tomato Coarse 0.48 1.15 2.90C Tomato Medium 0.57 1.21 8.01C Tomato Fine 0.79 2.25 18.94C Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.05 0.86 1.81C Wheat,Winter Medium 0.06 0.96 3.30C Wheat,Winter Fine 0.15 1.47 5.08
![Page 102: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/102.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-102
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
D Alfalfa Coarse 0.01 0.55 1.47D Alfalfa Medium 0.01 0.49 2.91D Alfalfa Fine 0.01 0.67 4.79D Corn Coarse 0.20 0.85 2.03D Corn Medium 0.26 0.87 3.28D Corn Fine 0.30 1.32 5.99D Cotton Coarse 0.01 1.04 2.53D Cotton Medium 0.02 0.97 3.37D Cotton Fine 0.09 1.63 5.68D Grass Coarse 0.02 0.39 3.14D Grass Medium 0.02 0.46 6.27D Grass Fine 0.05 0.55 6.91D Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.00 0.35 1.27D Wheat,Winter Medium 0.00 0.36 2.21D Wheat,Winter Fine 0.04 0.56 5.10E Grass Coarse 0.01 0.46 7.35E Grass Medium 0.02 0.63 8.00E Grass Fine 0.12 0.66 5.52E Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.02 0.59 2.46E Wheat,Spring Medium 0.05 0.70 4.67E Wheat,Spring Fine 0.07 0.87 2.92E Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.02 0.39 1.97E Wheat,Winter Medium 0.06 0.53 4.80E Wheat,Winter Fine 0.10 0.63 2.89F Corn Coarse 0.28 0.76 1.57F Corn Medium 0.36 0.92 2.92F Corn Fine 0.45 1.29 4.92F Grass Coarse 0.12 0.57 2.80F Grass Medium 0.15 0.66 2.69F Grass Fine 0.16 0.80 3.52F Soybean Coarse 0.20 0.95 3.26F Soybean Medium 0.26 1.05 3.23F Soybean Fine 0.29 1.48 4.40F Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.10 0.69 1.85F Wheat,Spring Medium 0.11 0.93 2.92F Wheat,Spring Fine 0.12 1.19 4.90F Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.14 0.85 3.17F Wheat,Winter Medium 0.19 1.03 6.43F Wheat,Winter Fine 0.18 1.41 11.05G Corn Coarse 0.11 0.69 1.88G Corn Medium 0.16 0.90 3.41G Corn Fine 0.23 1.62 6.59G Grass Coarse 0.09 0.55 1.85G Grass Medium 0.09 0.54 1.92G Grass Fine 0.18 0.91 3.67G Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.08 0.49 1.64G Wheat,Winter Medium 0.09 0.64 2.05G Wheat,Winter Fine 0.10 0.91 4.43H Corn Coarse 0.31 0.92 5.62H Corn Medium 0.62 1.49 11.03H Corn Fine 0.81 2.67 20.40
![Page 103: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/103.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-103
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
H Cotton Coarse 0.14 0.70 2.28H Cotton Medium 0.18 1.17 4.38H Cotton Fine 0.41 1.55 8.88H Grass Coarse 0.30 0.88 2.53H Grass Medium 0.29 0.95 3.53H Grass Fine 0.57 1.64 4.34H Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.15 0.65 2.29H Wheat,Winter Medium 0.21 0.99 3.81H Wheat,Winter Fine 0.32 1.30 9.16I Cotton Coarse 0.25 0.63 4.38I Cotton Medium 0.23 0.63 8.15I Cotton Fine 0.34 1.27 8.70I Grass Coarse 0.36 1.02 4.24I Grass Medium 0.42 1.09 5.49I Grass Fine 0.56 1.90 5.27I Sorghum Coarse 0.34 0.78 5.69I Sorghum Medium 0.31 0.79 8.75I Sorghum Fine 0.43 1.60 9.35I Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.38 0.78 6.87I Wheat,Spring Medium 0.41 0.82 12.28I Wheat,Spring Fine 0.60 1.60 15.24I Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.19 0.43 4.66I Wheat,Winter Medium 0.20 0.58 6.57I Wheat,Winter Fine 0.22 1.06 7.75J Corn Coarse 0.48 1.10 4.33J Corn Medium 0.61 1.54 7.48J Corn Fine 0.71 2.63 17.71J Grass Coarse 0.48 1.41 3.95J Grass Medium 0.61 1.86 5.13J Grass Fine 0.69 2.41 5.77J Sorghum Coarse 0.35 0.90 3.81J Sorghum Medium 0.47 1.31 6.67J Sorghum Fine 0.52 1.96 14.66J Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.37 0.89 3.65J Wheat,Spring Medium 0.48 1.30 5.93J Wheat,Spring Fine 0.72 2.31 13.76J Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.24 0.80 3.30J Wheat,Winter Medium 0.33 1.02 5.63J Wheat,Winter Fine 0.32 1.13 11.65K Alfalfa Coarse 0.16 0.90 2.35K Alfalfa Medium 0.28 1.39 2.95K Alfalfa Fine 0.16 1.25 2.96K Corn Coarse 0.40 1.14 2.41K Corn Medium 0.72 1.75 4.57K Corn Fine 0.45 1.81 5.27K Grass Coarse 0.35 1.07 3.77K Grass Medium 0.56 1.45 4.17K Grass Fine 0.35 1.54 5.64K Soybean Coarse 0.26 0.94 2.07K Soybean Medium 0.57 1.37 2.80K Soybean Fine 0.37 1.43 3.35
![Page 104: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/104.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-104
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
K Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.35 1.04 2.33K Wheat,Spring Medium 0.77 1.65 4.58K Wheat,Spring Fine 0.46 1.79 5.19L Corn Coarse 0.41 1.42 3.31L Corn Medium 0.63 1.97 5.92L Corn Fine 1.36 3.09 15.09L Grass Coarse 0.47 1.39 6.01L Grass Medium 0.56 1.82 7.02L Grass Fine 0.63 2.08 6.61L Soybean Coarse 0.31 1.29 2.45L Soybean Medium 0.45 1.66 3.10L Soybean Fine 0.95 2.31 6.22L Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.44 1.65 3.14L Wheat,Winter Medium 0.54 1.97 3.34L Wheat,Winter Fine 1.06 2.75 8.73M Corn Coarse 0.55 1.51 4.33M Corn Medium 0.87 2.28 11.87M Corn Fine 0.99 2.76 15.46M Grass Coarse 0.49 1.31 4.06M Grass Medium 0.68 1.91 4.97M Grass Fine 0.65 1.94 5.19M Soybean Coarse 0.41 1.29 2.66M Soybean Medium 0.71 1.86 5.03M Soybean Fine 0.78 2.08 7.52M Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.55 1.62 2.91M Wheat,Winter Medium 0.85 2.16 5.17M Wheat,Winter Fine 0.84 2.45 7.72N Corn Coarse 0.60 1.48 12.11N Corn Medium 0.76 2.11 19.17N Corn Fine 1.14 2.80 32.82N Grass Coarse 0.42 1.64 3.94N Grass Medium 0.57 2.08 5.03N Grass Fine 0.91 2.61 5.95N Soybean Coarse 0.58 1.31 4.04N Soybean Medium 0.73 1.80 5.24N Soybean Fine 1.00 2.07 11.18O Corn Coarse 0.60 1.55 4.52O Corn Medium 0.67 2.14 9.63O Corn Fine 1.07 3.08 24.03O Cotton Coarse 0.51 1.19 4.95O Cotton Medium 0.61 1.84 14.76O Cotton Fine 0.99 3.24 25.42O Grass Coarse 0.39 1.70 3.92O Grass Medium 0.44 2.24 7.03O Grass Fine 0.76 2.81 7.97O Rice Coarse 0.52 1.11 5.15O Rice Medium 0.73 1.29 9.18O Rice Fine 1.00 2.45 11.14O Soybean Coarse 0.53 1.22 3.73O Soybean Medium 0.55 1.66 6.67O Soybean Fine 0.86 2.18 14.83
![Page 105: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/105.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-105
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
P Corn Coarse 0.43 0.93 4.56P Corn Medium 0.60 1.85 12.27P Corn Fine 0.76 2.23 27.80P Cotton Coarse 0.37 0.81 4.04P Cotton Medium 0.63 1.68 10.68P Cotton Fine 0.73 2.18 20.32P Grass Coarse 0.29 1.26 4.30P Grass Medium 0.41 1.95 5.44P Grass Fine 0.50 2.79 7.47P Soybean Coarse 0.36 0.80 2.98P Soybean Medium 0.56 1.65 5.62P Soybean Fine 0.67 1.72 12.55R Alfalfa Coarse 0.09 1.35 3.01R Alfalfa Medium 0.26 1.63 3.10R Alfalfa Fine 0.25 1.85 3.61R Corn Coarse 0.25 1.35 2.84R Corn Medium 0.51 1.81 4.92R Corn Fine 0.53 2.25 4.97R Grass Coarse 0.30 1.77 7.53R Grass Medium 0.49 1.96 7.25R Grass Fine 0.56 2.82 9.59R Soybean Coarse 0.20 1.24 2.69R Soybean Medium 0.45 1.62 3.06R Soybean Fine 0.41 1.95 3.80S Alfalfa Coarse 0.16 1.03 2.23S Alfalfa Medium 0.36 1.54 2.99S Alfalfa Fine 0.44 1.53 3.44S Corn Coarse 0.44 1.14 2.84S Corn Medium 0.86 1.81 6.89S Corn Fine 0.97 2.20 12.36S Grass Coarse 0.60 1.37 3.02S Grass Medium 0.77 1.85 4.99S Grass Fine 0.93 2.35 6.43S Soybean Coarse 0.39 1.04 1.66S Soybean Medium 0.77 1.59 3.48S Soybean Fine 0.89 1.78 4.72T Corn Coarse 0.45 0.92 5.78T Corn Medium 0.48 1.15 11.08T Corn Fine 0.63 2.76 24.52T Grass Coarse 0.33 1.05 4.89T Grass Medium 0.41 1.23 8.49T Grass Fine 0.50 2.32 9.65T Soybean Coarse 0.40 0.81 4.06T Soybean Medium 0.48 0.98 8.03T Soybean Fine 0.50 1.79 17.49T Wheat,Winter Coarse 0.33 0.81 4.89T Wheat,Winter Medium 0.36 1.10 8.05T Wheat,Winter Fine 0.46 2.72 17.87U Corn Coarse 0.36 0.64 2.64U Corn Medium 0.34 0.66 4.67U Corn Fine 0.47 1.18 14.76
![Page 106: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/106.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-106
LRR Crop SoilGroupEmissionRate(25thPercentile)
EmissionRate(50thPercentile)
EmissionRate(97.5thPercentile)
U Grass Coarse 0.33 0.99 4.74U Grass Medium 0.35 0.79 4.09U Grass Fine 0.39 1.72 5.90U Potato Coarse 0.57 0.82 2.53U Potato Medium 0.63 1.05 13.93U Potato Fine 0.79 1.53 13.88U Wheat,Spring Coarse 0.23 0.55 2.08U Wheat,Spring Medium 0.30 0.54 5.11U Wheat,Spring Fine 0.32 0.84 10.58
3‐A.2EmpiricalScalarsforBaseEmissionRates
AsdescribedinTextbox3‐1,thebaseemissionratemodeledbyDAYCENTandDNDCisusedtocalculateanemissionfactorforthetypicalfertilizercasethatisthenscaledtoreflecttheincreaseinemissionfactorwithincreasingnitrogeninputs(SEFinTextbox3‐1).TocalculateSEFameta‐analysiswasperformedusingdatafromallfieldstudiesintheliteraturewhereatleastthreedifferentlevelsofnitrogeninput,includingazeronitrogenrate,wereappliedtothesamecropatthesamesiteduringthesamegrowingseason.EmissionfactorswerecalculatedasthedifferencebetweentheN2Ofluxesat0NandatxNdividedbytheN2Ofluxat0N.Thenullhypothesiswasthatemissionfactorswillbeconstantacrossdifferentnitrogenrates.
Atotalof44datasetsthatmeetthebasecriteriawereidentified.Fromeachdataset,slopesforeachfertilizeradditionintervalwerecalculatedandcomparedtotheslopeofthefirstinterval(0Ntothefirstnitrogenadditionlevel).Thevalueoftheslopeisameasureofhowmuchtheemissionfactorchangesperadditionalunitofnitrogenfertilizerinput(kgNha‐1)foragivenstudysiteyear.Thus,theslopemeasuresthedegreeofnonlinearityoftheemissionfactor.Theslopeiszeroiftheemissionfactorisconstant,asassumedbytheIPCCTier1method.Apositiveslopeindicatesthatthetotalemissionfunctionisconvexwithrespecttototalnitrogeninput,i.e.,thattheunitoffluxincrease(theemissionfactor)isgreaterwitheachsuccessiveunitofnitrogeninput.Uncertaintywasquantifiedwithaconfidenceintervalobtainedbyperformingabootstrapanalysis(n=100,000)ontheoriginalslopes.
Thereweresufficientdatatoanalyzefivedifferentsub‐categories:corn,grassland,othercrops,clay‐texturedsoils,andother‐texturedsoils.Themeanslopewassignificantlygreaterthanzeroforallanalyzedcategoriesbutonlythegrasslandcategorywassignificantlydifferentfromtheothers.ThusintheERbequationinTextbox3‐1therearetwovaluesforSEF,oneforgrasslandsandanotherforallothercrops.
Thestudiesusedinthemeta‐analysisareprovidedbelow.
Breitenbeck,G.A.,andJ.M.Bremner.1986.Effectsofrateanddepthoffertilizerapplicationonemissionofnitrousoxidefromsoilfertilizedwithanhydrousammonia.Biologyandfertilityofsoils,2(4):201‐204.
Cardenas,L.M.,R.Thorman,N.Ashlee,M.Butler,etal.2010.QuantifyingannualN2Oemissionfluxesfromgrazedgrasslandunderarangeofinorganicfertilisernitrogeninputs.Agriculture,EcosystemsandEnvironment,136:218‐226.
Chang,C.,C.M.Cho,andD.H.Janzen.1998.Nitrousoxideemissionfromlong‐termmanuredsoils.SoilScienceSocietyAmericaJournal,62:677‐682.
Ding,W.,Y.Cai,X.Cai,K.Yagi,etal.2007.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromanintensivelycultivatedmaize‐wheatrotationinsoilintheNorthChinaPlain.ScienceandtheTotalEnvironment,373.
![Page 107: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/107.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-107
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.A.Reule.2008.Nitrogen,Tillage,andCropRotationEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,37(4):1337‐1344.
Hoben,J.P.,R.J.Gehl,N.Millar,P.R.Grace,etal.2011.Nonlinearnitrousoxide(N2O)responsetonitrogenfertilizerinon‐farmcorncropsoftheUSMidwest.GlobalChangeBiology,17(2):1140‐1152.
Kaiser,E.A.,K.Kohrs,M.Kücke,E.Schnug,etal.1998.Nitrousoxidereleasefromarablesoil:importanceofN‐fertilization,cropsandtemporalvariation.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,30:1553‐1563.
Kammann,C.,L.Grünhage,C.Müller,S.Jacobi,andH.‐J.Jäger.1998.SeasonalvariabilityandmitigationoptionsforN2Oemissionsfromdifferentlymanagedgrasslands.EnvironmentalPollution,102(S1):179‐186.
Kim,D.‐G.,G.Hernandez‐Ramirez,andD.Giltrap.2013.Linearandnonlineardependencyofdirectnitrousoxideemissionsonfertilizernitrogeninput:ameta‐analysis.Agriculture,EcosystemsandEnvironment,168:53‐65.
Letica,S.A.,C.A.M.deKlein,C.J.Hoogendoorn,R.W.Tillman,etal.2010.Short‐termmeasurementofN2Oemissionsfromsheep‐grazedpasturereceivingincreasingratesoffertilisernitrogeninOtago,NewZealand.AnimalProductionScience,50:17‐24.
Lin,S.,J.Iqbal,R.Hu,J.Wu,etal.2011.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromrapefieldasaffectedbynitrogenfertilizermanagement:acasestudyincentralChina.AtmosphericEnvironment,45:1775‐1779.
Ma,B.L.,T.Y.Wu,N.Tremblay,W.Deen,etal.2010.Nitrousoxidefluxesfromcornfields:on‐farmassessmentoftheamountandtimingofnitrogenfertilizer.GlobalChangeBiology,16(1):156‐170.
McSwiney,C.P.,andG.P.Robertson.2005.NonlinearresponseofN2Ofluxtoincrementalfertilizeradditioninacontinuousmaize(ZeamaysL.)croppingsystem.GlobalChangeBiology,11(10):1712‐1719.
Mosier,A.R.,A.D.Halvorson,C.A.Reule,andX.J.Liu.2006.NetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensityinirrigatedcroppingsystemsinnortheasternColorado.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35(4):1584‐1598.
Signor,D.,C.E.P.Cerri,andR.Conant.2013.N2OemissionsduetonitrogenfertilizerapplicationsintworegionsofsugarcanecultivationinBrazil.EnvironmentalResearchLetters,8(1):015013.
Song,C.,andJ.Zhang.2009.Effectsofsoilmoisture,temperature,andnitrogenfertilizationonsoilrespirationandnitrousoxideemissionduringmaizegrowthperiodinnortheastChina.ActaAgriculturaeScandinavia,59:97‐106.
vanGroenigen,J.W.,G.J.Kasper,G.L.Velthof,A.vandenPol‐vanDasselar,etal.2004.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromsilagemaizefieldsunderdifferentmineralnitrogenfertilizerandslurryapplications.PlantandSoil,263.
Velthof,G.L.,O.Oenema,R.Postma,andM.L.VanBeusichem.1997.Effectsoftypeandamountofappliednitrogenfertilizeronnitrousoxidefluxesfromintensivelymanagedgrassland.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,46:257‐267.
Zebarth,B.J.,P.Rochette,andD.L.Burton.2008.N2Oemissionsfromspringbarleyproductionasinfluencedbyfertilizernitrogenrate.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:197‐205.
Zhang,J.,andX.Han.2008.N2Oemissionfromthesemi‐aridecosystemundermineralfertilizer(ureaandsuperphosphate)andincreasedprecipitationinnorthernChina.AtmosphericEnvironment,42:291‐302.
![Page 108: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/108.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-108
3‐A.3Practice‐BasedScalingFactors
Datawereanalyzedtoderivescalingfactorsforthefollowingpractices:nitrogenfertilizerplacement,nitrificationinhibitors,no‐tillmanagement,andslow‐releasefertilizers.PracticeswereincludediftherewassufficientevidencefromfieldexperimentstosuggestthatthepracticeinfluencedN2Oemissions,orforwhichapreviousmeta‐analysishadbeenconductedandshownthatthepracticehadaneffectonN2Oemissions(i.e.,no‐tillmanagement;vanKesseletal.,2012).AllpracticeswerefoundtohaveasignificanteffectonN2Oemissionwiththeexceptionofnitrogenplacement.ThescalingfactorsareprovidedinTable3‐9.
Documentationfortheno‐tillscalingfactorcanbefoundinvanKesseletal.Scalingfactorsfornitrificationinhibitorswerederivedusingalinearmixed‐effectmodelingapproach(PinheiroandBates,2000),similartothemethodusedbyOgleetal.(2005)toderivefactorsthatwereusedinthe2006IPCCGuidelines(IPCC,2006).Variancesassociatedwithindividualexperimentalresultswerenottakenintoconsiderationinthemeta‐analysesbecausemanystudiesdidnotprovidethisinformation.AgoalforfutureanalysessupportingtheUSDAmethodswillbetoincludevariances,undertheassumptionthatstudieswillreportthisinformationinfuturepublications.Covariateswereincludedintheanalysistodetermineifthepracticehadadifferenteffectdependingonthelanduse,climate,soiltype,watermanagement,tillagepractice,orcroptype.Covariateswereretainedinthemodelifthevariablewassignificantatanalphalevelof0.05.Forotherscalingfactors,therewereinsufficientdatatousethelinearmixed‐effectmodelingapproach,andsoaveragedifferencesbetweenthecontrolandtreatmentswereestimatedfromthestudiestoestimateascalingfactor.Theresultingestimateswereevaluatedforstatisticalsignificantfromavalueof0(ornoeffect)usinganalphalevelof0.05.A95percentconfidenceintervalwasderivedforeachscalingfactorandprovidedinTable3‐6asanupperandlowerboundontheestimatedfactor.
Thestudiesusedineachmeta‐analysisareprovidedbelow.
NitrogenFertilizerPlacement:Burton,D.L.,X.Li,andC.A.Grant.2008.Influenceoffertilizernitrogensourceandmanagement
practiceonN2OemissionsfromtwoBlackChernozemicsoils.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:219‐227.
Drury,C.F.,W.D.Reynolds,C.S.Tan,T.W.Welacky,etal.2006.EmissionsofNitrousOxideandCarbonDioxide.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70(2):570‐581.
Engel,R.,D.L.Liang,R.Wallander,andA.Bembenek.2010.InfluenceofUreaFertilizerPlacementonNitrousOxideProductionfromaSiltLoamSoil.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(1):115‐125.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.DelGrosso.2013.Nitrogenplacementandsourceeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsandyieldsofirrigatedcorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,42(Inpress).
Hou,A.X.,andH.Tsuruta.2003.NitrousoxideandnitricoxidefluxesfromanuplandfieldinJapan:effectofureatype,placement,andcropresidues.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,65:191‐200.
Hultgreen,G.,andP.Leduc.2003.Theeffectofnitrogenfertilizerplacement,formulation,timing,andrateongreenhousegasemissionsandagronomicperformance:AgricultureAgri‐FoodCanada,PrairieAgriculturalMachineryInstitute.
Liu,X.J.,A.R.Mosier,A.D.Halvorson,andF.S.Zhang.2005.Tillageandnitrogenapplicationeffectsonnitrousandnitricoxideemissionsfromirrigatedcornfields.PlantandSoil,276:235‐249.
Maharjan,B.,andR.T.Venterea.Inreview.Nitritedynamicsexplainfertilizermanagementeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsinmaize.SubmittedtoSoilBiologyandBiochemistry.
Zebarth,B.J.,P.Rochette,D.L.Burton,andM.Price.2008.EffectoffertilizernitrogenmanagementonN2Oemissionsincommercialcornfields.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:189‐195.
![Page 109: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/109.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-109
NitrificationInhibitors:Akiyama,H.,H.Tsuruta,andT.Watanabe.2000.N2OandNoEmissionsfromSoilsafterthe
ApplicationofDifferentChemicalFertilizers.Chemosphere‐GlobalChangeScience,2(3):313‐320.
Ball,B.C.,K.C.Cameron,H.J.Di,andS.Moore.2012.EffectsofTramplingofaWetDairyPastureSoilonSoilPorosityandonMitigationofNitrousOxideEmissionsbyaNitrificationInhibitor,Dicyandiamide.SoilUseandManagement,28(2):194‐201.
Bremner,J.M.,G.A.Breitenbeck,andA.M.Blackmer.1981.EffectofNitrapyrinonEmissionofNitrousOxidefromSoilFertilizedwithAnhydrousAmmonia.GeophysicalResearchLetters,8(4):353‐356.
Bronson,K.F.,A.R.Mosier,andS.R.Bishnoi.1992.NitrousOxideEmissionsinIrrigatedCornasAffectedbyNitrificationInhibitors.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,56(1):161‐165.
Cui,M.,X.C.Sun,C.X.Hu,H.J.Di,etal.2011.EffectiveMitigationofNitrateLeachingandNitrousOxideEmissionsinIntensiveVegetableProductionSystemsUsingaNitrificationInhibitor,Dicyandiamide.JournalofSoilsandSediments,11(5):722‐730.
deKlein,C.A.M.,K.C.Cameron,H.J.Di,G.Rys,etal.2011.RepeatedAnnualUseoftheNitrificationInhibitorDicyandiamide(Dcd)DoesNotAlterItsEffectivenessinReducingN2OEmissionsfromCowUrine.AnimalFeedScienceandTechnology,166‐167:480‐491.
Delgado,J.A.,andA.R.Mosier.1996.MitigationAlternativestoDecreaseNitrousOxidesEmissionsandUrea‐NitrogenLossandTheirEffectonMethaneFlux.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,25(5):1105‐1111.
Dittert,K.,R.Bol,R.King,D.Chadwick,etal.2001.UseofanovelnitrificationinhibitortoreducenitrousoxideemissionfromN15‐labelleddairyslurryinjectedintosoil.RapidCommunicationsinMassSpectrometry,15:1291‐1296.
Dobbie,K.E.,andK.A.Smith.2003.ImpactofDifferentFormsofNFertilizeronN2OEmissionsfromIntensiveGrassland.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,67(1):37‐46.
Ghosh,S.,D.Majumdar,andM.C.Jain.2003.MethaneandNitrousOxideEmissionsfromanIrrigatedRiceofNorthIndia.Chemosphere,51(3):181‐195.
Hadi,A.,O.Jumadi,K.Inubushi,andK.Yagi.2008.MitigationOptionsforN2OEmissionfromaCornFieldinKalimantan,Indonesia.Soilscienceandplantnutrition,54(4):644‐649.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.A.Reule.2008.Nitrogen,Tillage,andCropRotationEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,37(4):1337‐1344.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andF.Alluvione.2010.TillageandInorganicNitrogenSourceEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):436‐445.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.P.Jantalia.2011.NitrogenSourceEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromStrip‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40(6):1775‐1786.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.D.Grosso.2012.NitrogenSourceandPlacementEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromNo‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,41(5):1349‐1360.
Halvorson,A.D.,C.S.Snyder,A.D.Blaylock,andS.J.DelGrosso.Inreview.EnhancedEfficiencyNitrogenFertilizers:PotentialRoleinNitrousOxideEmissionMitigation.AgronomyJournal.
Jumadi,O.,Y.Hala,A.Muis,A.Ali,M.Palennari,K.Yagi,andK.Inubushi.2008.InfluencesofChemicalFertilizersandaNitrificationInhibitoronGreenhouseGasFluxesinaCorn(ZeaMaysL.)FieldinIndonesia.Microbesandenvironments,23(1):29‐34.
Kelly,K.B.,F.A.Phillips,andR.Baigent.2008.ImpactofdicyandiamideapplicationonnitrousoxideemissionsfromurinepatchesinnorthernVictoria,Australia.AustralianJournalofExperimentalAgriculture,48:156‐159.
![Page 110: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/110.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-110
Kumar,U.,M.C.Jain,H.Pathak,S.Kumar,etal.2000.NitrousOxideEmissionfromDifferentFertilizersandItsMitigationbyNitrificationInhibitorsinIrrigatedRice.Biologyandfertilityofsoils,32(6):474‐478.
Linzmeier,W.,R.Gutser,andU.Schmidhalter.2001.NitrousOxideEmissionfromSoilandfromaNitrogen‐15‐LabelledFertilizerwiththeNewNitrificationInhibitor3,4‐DimethylpyrazolePhosphate(Dmpp).Biologyandfertilityofsoils,34(2):103‐108.
Macadam,X.M.B.,A.Prado,P.Merino,J.M.Estavillo,etal.2003.Dicyandiamideand3,4‐DimethylPyrazolePhosphateDecreaseN2OEmissionsfromGrasslandbutDicyandiamideProducesDeleteriousEffectsinClover.Journalofplantphysiology,160(12):1517‐1523.
Magalhaes,A.M.T.,P.M.Chalk,andW.M.Strong.1984.EffectofNitrapyrinonNitrousOxideEmissionfromFallowSoilsFertilizedwithAnhydrousAmmonia.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,5(4):411‐421.
Majumdar,D.,S.Kumar,H.Pathak,M.C.Jain,etal.2000.ReducingNitrousOxideEmissionfromanIrrigatedRiceFieldofNorthIndiawithNitrificationInhibitors.Agriculture,ecosystems&environment,81(3):163‐169.
Majumdar,D.,H.Pathak,S.Kumar,andM.C.Jain.2002.NitrousOxideEmissionfromaSandyLoamInceptisolunderIrrigatedWheatinIndiaasInfluencedbyDifferentNitrificationInhibitors.Agriculture,ecosystems&environment,91(1):283‐293.
Malla,G.,A.Bhatia,H.Pathak,S.Prasad,etal.2005.MitigatingNitrousOxideandMethaneEmissionsfromSoilinRice‐WheatSystemoftheIndo‐GangeticPlainwithNitrificationandUreaseInhibitors.Chemosphere,58(2):141‐147.
McTaggart,I.P.,H.Clayton,J.Parker,L.Swan,etal.1997.NitrousOxideEmissionsfromGrasslandandSpringBarley,FollowingNFertiliserApplicationwithandwithoutNitrificationInhibitors.Biologyandfertilityofsoils,25(3):261‐268.
Menendez,S.,P.Merino,M.Pinto,C.González‐Murua,etal.2006.3,4‐DimethylpyrazolPhosphateEffectonNitrousOxide,NitricOxide,Ammonia,andCarbonDioxideEmissionsfromGrasslands.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35(4):973‐981.
Merino,P.,J.M.Estavillo,L.A.Graciolli,M.Pinto,etal.2002.MitigationofN2OEmissionsfromGrasslandbyNitrificationInhibitorandActilithF2AppliedwithFertilizerandCattleSlurry.SoilUseandManagement,18(2):135‐141.
Parkin,T.B.,andJ.L.Hatfield.2010.InfluenceofNitrapyrinonN2OLossesfromSoilReceivingFall‐AppliedAnhydrousAmmonia.Agriculture,ecosystems&environment,136(1):81‐86.
Pathak,H.,A.Bhatia,S.Prasad,S.Singh,etal.2002.EmissionofNitrousOxidefromRice‐WheatSystemsofIndo‐GangeticPlainsofIndia.Environmentalmonitoringandassessment,77(2):163‐178.
Sanz‐Cobena,A.,L.Sánchez‐Martín,L.García‐Torres,andA.Vallejo.2012.GaseousemissionsofN2OandNOandNO3‐leachingfromureaappliedwithureaseandnitrificationinhibitorstoamaize(Zeamays)crop.Agriculture,ecosystems&environment,149:64‐73.
Shoji,S.,J.Delgado,A.Mosier,andY.Miura.2001.UseofControlledReleaseFertilizersandNitrificationInhibitorstoIncreaseNitrogenUseEfficiencyandtoConserveAirAndwaterQuality.CommunicationsinSoilScienceandPlantAnalysis,32(7‐8):1051‐1070.
Smith,L.C.,C.A.M.deKlein,andW.D.Catto.2008.EffectofDicyandiamideAppliedinaGranularFormonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromaGrazedDairyPastureinSouthland,NewZealand.NewZealandJournalofAgriculturalResearch,51(4):387‐396.
Vallejo,A.,L.Garcia‐Torres,J.A.Diez,A.Arce,etal.2005.ComparisonofNlosses(NO3‐,N2O,NO)fromsurfaceapplied,injectedoramended(DCD)pigslurryofanirrigatedsoilinaMediterraneanclimate.PlantandSoil,272:313‐325.
Vallejo,A.,U.M.Skiba,L.Garcia‐Torres,A.Arce,etal.2006.Nitrogenoxidesemissionfromsoilsbearingapotatocropasinfluencedbyfertilizationwithtreatedpigslurriesandcomposts.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,38:2782‐2793.
![Page 111: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/111.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-111
Venterea,R.T.,B.Maharjan,andM.S.Dolan.2011.Fertilizersourceandtillageeffectsonyield‐scaledN2Oemissionsinacorncroppingsystem.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality.
Weiske,A.,G.Benckiser,andJ.C.G.Ottow.2001.EffectoftheNewNitrificationInhibitorDmppinComparisontoDcdonNitrousOxide(N2O)EmissionsandMethane(CH4)OxidationDuring3YearsofRepeatedApplicationsinFieldExperiments.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,60(1):57‐64.
Zaman,M.,M.L.Nguyen,J.D.Blennerhassett,andB.F.Quin.2008.ReducingNH3,N2Oand‐NLossesfromaPastureSoilwithUreaseorNitrificationInhibitorsandElementalS‐AmendedNitrogenousFertilizers.Biologyandfertilityofsoils,44(5):693‐705.
Slow‐releaseFertilizers:Akiyama,H.,H.Tsuruta,andT.Watanabe.2000.N2OandNOEmissionsfromSoilsafterthe
ApplicationofDifferentChemicalFertilizers.Chemosphere‐GlobalChangeScience,2(3):313‐320.
Akiyama,H.,andH.Tsuruta.2002.EffectofchemicalfertilizerformonN2O,NOandNO2fluxesfromAndisolfield.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,63:219‐230.
Ball,B.C.,K.C.Cameron,H.J.Di,andS.Moore.2012.EffectsofTramplingofaWetDairyPastureSoilonSoilPorosityandonMitigationofNitrousOxideEmissionsbyaNitrificationInhibitor,Dicyandiamide.SoilUseandManagement,28(2):194‐201.
Burton,D.L.,X.Li,andC.A.Grant.2008.InfluenceoffertilizernitrogensourceandmanagementpracticeonN2OemissionsfromtwoBlackChernozemicsoils.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:219‐227.
Cheng,W.,Y.Nakajima,S.Sudo,H.Akiyama,etal.2002.N2OandNOemissionsfromafieldofChinesecabbageasinfluencedbybandapplicationofureaorcontrolled‐releaseureafertilizers.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,63:231‐238.
Chu,H.Y.,Y.Hosen,andK.Yagi.2007.NO,N2O,CH4andfluxesinwinterbarleyfieldofJapaneseAndisolasaffectedbyNfertilizermanagement.SoilBiology&Biochemistry,39:330‐339.
Delgado,J.A.,andA.R.Mosier.1996.MitigationAlternativestoDecreaseNitrousOxidesEmissionsandUrea‐NitrogenLossandTheirEffectonMethaneFlux.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,25(5):1105‐1111.
Dobbie,K.E.,andK.A.Smith.2003.ImpactofDifferentFormsofNFertilizeronN2OEmissionsfromIntensiveGrassland.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,67(1):37‐46.
Hadi,A.,O.Jumadi,K.Inubushi,andK.Yagi.2008.MitigationOptionsforN2OEmissionfromaCornFieldinKalimantan,Indonesia.Soilscienceandplantnutrition,54(4):644‐649.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andF.Alluvione.2010a.NitrogenSourceEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedNo‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(5):1554‐1562.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andF.Alluvione.2010b.TillageandInorganicNitrogenSourceEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):436‐445.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.P.Jantalia.2011.NitrogenSourceEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromStrip‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40(6):1775‐1786.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.D.Grosso.2012.NitrogenSourceandPlacementEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromNo‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,41(5):1349‐1360.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.DelGrosso.2013.Nitrogenplacementandsourceeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsandyieldsofirrigatedcorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,42(Inpress).
Hou,A.X.,andH.Tsuruta.2003.NitrousoxideandnitricoxidefluxesfromanuplandfieldinJapan:effectofureatype,placement,andcropresidues.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,65:191‐200.
![Page 112: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/112.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-112
Hyatt,C.R.,R.T.Venterea,C.J.Rosen,M.McNearney,etal.2010.Polymer‐CoatedUreaMaintainsPotatoYieldsandReducesNitrousOxideEmissionsinaMinnesotaLoamySand.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):419‐428.
Ji,Y.,G.Liu,J.Ma,H.Xu,etal.2012.Effectofcontrolled‐releasefertilizeronnitrousoxideemissionfromawinterwheatfield.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,94:111‐122.
Jiang,J.Y.,Z.H.Hu,W.J.Sun,andY.Huang.2010.NitrousoxideemissionsfromChinesecroplandfertilizedwitharangeofslow‐releasenitrogencompounds.AgricultureEcosystems&Environment,135:216‐225.
Jumadi,O.,Y.Hala,A.Muis,A.Ali,M.Palennari,K.Yagi,andK.Inubushi.2008.InfluencesofChemicalFertilizersandaNitrificationInhibitoronGreenhouseGasFluxesinaCorn(ZeaMaysL.)FieldinIndonesia.Microbesandenvironments,23(1):29‐34.
Maharjan,B.,R.T.Venterea,andC.Rosen.2013.FertilizerandIrrigationManagementEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsandNitrateLeaching.AgronomyJournal.
Maharjan,B.,andR.T.Venterea.Inreview.Nitritedynamicsexplainfertilizermanagementeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsinmaize.SubmittedtoSoilBiologyandBiochemistry.
Nash,P.R.2010.Alternativetillageandnitrogenmanagementoptionstoincreasecropproductionandreducenitrousoxideemissionsfromclaypansoils:M.S.Thesis,UniversityofMissouri.
Shoji,S.,J.Delgado,A.Mosier,andY.Miura.2001.UseofControlledReleaseFertilizersandNitrificationInhibitorstoIncreaseNitrogenUseEfficiencyandtoConserveAirAndwaterQuality.CommunicationsinSoilScienceandPlantAnalysis,32(7‐8):1051‐1070.
Venterea,R.T.,B.Maharjan,andM.S.Dolan.2011.Fertilizersourceandtillageeffectsonyield‐scaledN2Oemissionsinacorncroppingsystem.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality.
Yan,X.Y.,Y.Hosen,andK.Yagi.2001.NitrousoxideandnitricoxideemissionsfrommaizefieldplotsasaffectedbyNfertilizertypeandapplicationmethod.Biologyandfertilityofsoils,34:297‐303.
Zebarth,B.J.,E.Snowdon,D.L.Burton,C.Goyer,etal.2012.Controlledreleasefertilizerproducteffectsonpotatocropresponseandnitrousoxideemissionsunderrain‐fedproductiononamedium‐texturedsoil.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,92:759‐769.
![Page 113: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/113.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-113
Appendix3‐B:GuidanceforCropsNotIncludedintheDAYCENTModel
TheDAYCENTmodelisrecommendedforuseinestimatingSoilCarbonStockChanges(Section3.5.3),andwasused(alongwiththeDNDCmodel)togeneratebaseemissionratesforEquation3‐9(SeeAppendix3‐AforadiscussionofhowmodelswereusedtoestimateN2Oemissionsfrommineralsoils).Inaddition,nitrogenmineralizedfromsoilorganicmatter(Nmin);additionalnitrogeninputsfromachangeinsoilorganicmattermineralizationduetoaland‐usechangeortillagechange(Ndmin);nitrogenmineralizationfromorganicamendments(e.g.,manure,sewagesludge,compost);andnitrogenmineralizationfromcrop,grass,andcovercropresidues(Nresid)aregeneratedbytheDAYCENTmodel.
TheDAYCENTmodelisnotusedtogenerateestimatesforallcropsgrownintheUnitedStates.TheDAYCENTmodeliscurrentlyusedtoestimateSOCstocksforthefollowingcropsandsectors:agroforestry,almond,alfalfa,windbreak,woodlot,sorghum,springwheat,winterwheat,woodlot—softwoods,woodlot—hardwoods,clover,cotton,drylandbeans,corn,oats,millet,grass‐cloverpasture,grass,peas,potato,sugarbeets,sunflower,soybean,sugarcane,peanut,tobacco,uplandrice,windbreakthree‐row,andwalnut.Thesecropsrepresent90percentofthecropsgrownintheUnitedStates,andmorecropsaretestedandaddedtotheDAYCENTmodel‐basedassessmentonaregularbasis.
However,ifanentityismanagingacropthatisnotincludedintheDAYCENTlistofcrops,the2006IPCCGuidelinesmaybeusedtoestimateemissionsorsinksforthesourceslistedabove.ThisapproachisconsistentwiththeU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgencyNationalInventoryReport(U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,2013),andacompletediscussionofthisalternativemethodologyinprovidedinAnnex3(Section3.12)oftheNationalInventoryReport.15Specifically,theNationalInventoryReportusesacombinationofTier1,2,and3approachestoestimatedirectandindirectN2Oemissionsandsoilchangesinagriculturalsoils.ThisreportfollowsthesameapproachforthecropsnotincludedintheDAYCENTmodelwhenestimatingsoilcarbonstockchangesanddirectN2Oemissions(SeeTable3‐B‐1).
Table3‐B‐1AlternativeMethodologiesforCropsNotIncludedintheDAYCENTModel
Source Tier1 Tier2
SoilcarbonstockchangesIPCC2006Guidelines(SeeChapter5,Section5.2.3.3)
DirectN2OemissionsfrommineralsoilsforthecropsNOTestimatedbytheDAYCENTmodel
IPCC2006Guidelineswithmanagementbasedscalingfactors(SeeSection3.5.4)
Nsmin, Notestimated
Nitrogeninputsfromorganicamendments(NmanandNcomp)
IPCC2006Guidelines(SeeChapter11Section11.2.1.1)
Nresid Equation3‐B‐1Residuenitrogen(Seebelow)
15SeeU.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency,NationalGHGInventoryAnnex3:http://www.epa.gov/climatechange/Downloads/ghgemissions/US‐GHG‐Inventory‐2013‐Annex‐3‐Additional‐Source‐or‐Sink‐Categories.pdf
![Page 114: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/114.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-114
Defaultvaluesfordrymattercontent,root:shootratioandharvestindexareprovidedinTable3‐5inSection3.5.1.2.DefaultvaluesfromtheIPCCguidelinesvaluesareprovidedinTable3‐B‐2forthenitrogencontentofabovegroundandbelowgroundresiduesinmajorcroptypesandindividualcrops.
Equation3‐B‐1:ResidueN
ForCrops:
Nresid=[((Ydm/HI)–Ydm)x(1–Rr)xNa]+[(Ydm/HI)xR:SxNb]
ForGrazingForage:
Nresid=[Ydmx(1–Fr–Rr)xNa]+[YdmxR:SxNb]
Where:
Nresid =Nitrogeninresiduesaboveandbelowgroundontheparcelofland (metrictonsNyear‐1ha‐1)
Ydm =Cropharvestorforageyield,correctedformoisturecontent (metrictonsbiomassha‐1) =YxDM
Y =Cropharvestortotalforageyield(metrictonsbiomassha‐1)
DM =Drymattercontentofharvestedbiomass(dimensionless)
HI =HarvestIndex(dimensionless)
Fr =Proportionofliveforageremovedbygrazinganimals(dimensionless)
Rr =Proportionofcrop/forageresidueremovedduetoharvest,burningorgrazing(dimensionless)
Na =Nitrogenfractionofabovegroundresiduebiomassforthecroporforage(dimensionless)
Nb =Nitrogenfractionofbelowgroundresiduebiomassforthecroporforage(dimensionless)
R:S =Root‐shootratio(unitless)
![Page 115: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/115.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-115
Table3‐B‐2:NitrogenContentofAbovegroundandBelowgroundResiduesofMajorandIndividualCrops
CropNitrogenContentof
AbovegroundResidues(kgN(kgdm)‐1)
NitrogenContentofBelowgroundResidues
(kgN(kgdm)‐1)
Majorcroptypes
Grains 0.006 0.009Beansandpulses 0.008 0.008Grass‐clovermixtures 0.025 0.016Nitrogen‐fixingforages 0.027 0.022Non‐nitrogen‐fixingforages 0.015 0.012Perennialgrasses 0.015 0.012Rootcrops,other 0.016 0.014Tubers 0.019 0.014IndividualcropsAlfalfa 0.027 0.019Barley 0.007 0.014Drybean 0.01 0.01Maize 0.006 0.007Millet 0.007 NANon‐legumehay 0.015 0.012Oats 0.007 0.008Peanut(w/pod) 0.016 NAPotato 0.019 0.014Rice 0.007 NARye 0.005 0.011Sorghum 0.007 0.006Soybean 0.008 0.008Springwheat 0.006 0.009Wheat 0.006 0.009Winterwheat 0.006 0.009Source:deKlein(2006).
![Page 116: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/116.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-116
Chapter3References
Aalde,H.,P.Gonzalez,M.Gytarski,T.Krug,etal.2006.Chapter2:Genericmethodologiesapplicabletomultipleland‐usecategories.In2006IPCCGuidelinesforNationalGreenhouseGasInventories,S.Eggleston,L.Buendia,K.Miwa,T.NgaraandK.Tanabe(eds.).Japan:IGES.
Adviento‐Borbe,M.A.A.,M.L.Haddix,D.L.Binder,D.T.Walters,etal.2007.Soilgreenhousegasfluxesandglobalwarmingpotentialinfourhigh‐yieldingmaizesystems.GlobalChangeBiology,13(9):1972‐1988.
Akiyama,H.,H.Tsuruta,andT.Watanabe.2000.N2OandNOEmissionsfromSoilsaftertheApplicationofDifferentChemicalFertilizers.Chemosphere‐GlobalChangeScience,2(3):313‐320.
Akiyama,H.,andH.Tsuruta.2002.EffectofchemicalfertilizerformonN2O,NOandNO2fluxesfromAndisolfield.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,63:219‐230.
Akiyama,H.,K.Yagi,andX.Yan.2005.DirectN2Oemissionsfromricepaddyfields:Summaryofavailabledata.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,19.
Akiyama,H.,X.Yan,andK.Yagi.2010.Evaluationofeffectivenessofenhanced‐efficiencyfertilizersasmitigationoptionsforN2OandNOemissionsfromagriculturalsoils:meta‐analysis.GlobalChangeBiology,16(6):1837‐1846.
Allard,V.,J.F.Soussana,R.Falcimagne,P.Berbigier,etal.2007.Theroleofgrazingmanagementforthenetbiomeproductivityandgreenhousegasbudget(CO2,N2OandCH4)ofsemi‐naturalgrassland.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,121(1‐2):47‐58.
Allen,D.E.,D.S.Mendham,B.Singh,A.Cowie,etal.2009.Nitrousoxideandmethaneemissionsfromsoilarereducedfollowingaforestationofpasturelandsinthreecontrastingclimaticzones.AustralianJournalofSoilResearch,47:443‐458.
Allen,L.H.J.2007.CarbonbalanceofsugarcaneagricultureonhistosolsoftheEvergladesAgriculturalArea:review,analysis,andglobalenergyperspectives.SoilandCropScienceSocietyofFloridaProceedings,66:7‐14.
Allen,L.H.J.2012.GreenhousegasfluxesofdrainedorganicandfloodedmineralagriculturalsoilsintheUnitedStates.InManagingAgriculturalGreenhouseGases,M.A.Liebig,A.J.FranzluebbersandR.F.Follett(eds.).SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Allen,S.,S.Jose,P.K.R.Nair,B.J.Brecke,etal.2004.Safetynetroleoftreeroots:experimentalevidencefromanalleycroppingsystem.ForEcolManage,192:395‐407.
Ambus,P.,andG.Robertson.2006.TheEffectofIncreasedNDepositiononNitrousOxide,MethaneandCarbonDioxideFluxesfromUnmanagedForestandGrasslandCommunitiesinMichigan.Biogeochemistry,79(3):315‐337.
Andraski,T.W.,andL.G.Bundy.2002.UsingthePresidedressSoilNitrateTestandOrganicNitrogenCreditingtoImproveCornNitrogenRecommendations.AgronomyJournal,94(6):1411‐1418.
Andreae,M.O.,andP.Merlet.2001.Emissionoftracegasesandaerosolsfrombiomassburning.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,15(4):955‐966.
Archer,D.W.,A.D.Halvorson,andC.A.Reule.2008.EconomicsofIrrigatedContinuousCornunderConventional‐TillandNo‐TillinNorthernColorado.AgronomyJournal,100(4):1166‐1172.
Armentano,T.V.,andE.S.Menges.1986.Patternsofchangeinthecarbonbalanceoforganicsoil.Atkinson,C.,J.Fitzgerald,andN.Hipps.2010.Potentialmechanismsforachievingagricultural
benefitsfrombiocharapplicationtotemperatesoils:areview.PlantandSoil,337(1):1‐18.Badarinath,K.V.S.,T.R.KiranChand,andV.KrishnaPrasad.2009.Emissionsfromgrassland
burninginKazirangaNationalPark,India‐AnalysisfromIRS‐P6AWiFSsatelliteremotesensingdatasets.GeocartoInternational,24(2):89‐97.
![Page 117: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/117.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-117
Baker,J.M.,T.E.Ochsner,R.T.Venterea,andT.J.Griffis.2007.Tillageandsoilcarbonsequestration—Whatdowereallyknow?Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,118(1‐4):1‐5.
Ball,B.C.,K.C.Cameron,H.J.Di,andS.Moore.2012.EffectsofTramplingofaWetDairyPastureSoilonSoilPorosityandonMitigationofNitrousOxideEmissionsbyaNitrificationInhibitor,Dicyandiamide.SoilUseandManagement,28(2):194‐201.
Barton,L.,andL.A.Schipper.2001.RegulationofNitrousOxideEmissionsfromSoilsIrrigatedwithDairyFarmEffluentJournalofEnvironmentalQuality,30:1881‐1887.
Beaulieu,J.J.,J.L.Tank,S.K.Hamilton,W.M.Wollheim,etal.2011.Nitrousoxideemissionfromdenitrificationinstreamandrivernetworks.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences.
Beetz,A.E.,andL.Rhinehart.Rotationalgrazing.Retrievedfromwww.attra.ncat.org/attra‐pub/rotgraze.html.
Bellefontaine,R.,S.Petit,M.Pain‐Orcet,P.Deleporte,etal.2002.Treesoutsideforests:Towardsabetterawareness.Rome:CIRADandFAO.
Bement,R.E.1969.Astocking‐rateguideforbeefproductiononblue‐gramarange.JournalofRangeManagement,22:83‐86.
Bharati,K.,S.R.Mohanty,P.V.L.Padmavathi,V.R.Rao,etal.2000.InfluenceofSixNitrificationInhibitorsonMethaneProductioninaFloodedAlluvialSoil.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,58(1):389‐394.
Bhat,R.,S.Sujatha,andD.Balasimha.2007.Impactofdripfertigationonproductivityofarecanut(ArecacatechuL.).AgriculturalWaterManagement,90:101‐111.
Biasi,C.,S.E.Lind,N.M.Pekkarinen,J.T.Huttunen,etal.2008.DirectexperimentalevidenceforthecontributionoflimetoCO2releasefrommanagedpeatsoil.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,40(10):2660‐2669.
Bierman,P.,C.J.Rosen,R.T.Venterea,andJ.Lamb.2011.SurveyofnitrogenfertilizeruseoncorninMinnesota.AgriculturalSystems.
Bilotta,G.S.,R.E.Brazier,andP.M.Haygarth.2007.Theimpactsofgrazinganimalsonthequalityofsoils,vegetation,andsurfacewatersinintensivelymanagedgrasslands.AdvancesinAgronomy,94:237‐280.
Birdsey,R.A.1992.CarbonstorageandaccumulationinUnitedStatesforestecosystems.WashingtonDC:USDAForestService.
Blanco‐Canqui,H.,N.L.Klocke,A.J.Schlegel,L.R.Stone,etal.2010.ImpactsofDeficitIrrigationonCarbonSequestrationandSoilPhysicalPropertiesunderNo‐Till.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(4):1301‐1309.
Blank,R.R.,andM.A.Fosberg.1989.CultivatedandAdjacentVirginSoilsinNorthcentralSouthDakota:I.ChemicalandPhysicalComparisonsII.MineralogicalandMicromorphologicalComparisons.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,53:1484‐1490.
Boeckx,P.,X.Xu,andO.vanCleemput.2005.MitigationofN2OandCH4emissionfromriceandwheatcroppingsystemsusingdicyandiamideandhydroquinone.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,72:41‐49.
Bossio,D.A.,W.R.Horwath,R.G.Mutters,andC.vanKessel.1999.Methanepoolandfluxdynamicsinaricefieldfollowingstrawincorporation.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,31:1313‐1322.
Boutton,T.W.,J.D.Liao,T.R.Filley,andS.R.Archer.2009.Belowgroundcarbonstorageanddynamicsaccompanyingwoodyplantencroachmentinasubtropicalsavanna.InSoilcarbonsequestrationandthegreenhouseeffect,2ndedition,R.LalandR.F.Follett(eds.).Madison,WI:SSSASpecialPublication.
Boutton,T.W.,andJ.D.Liao.2010.Changesinsoilnitrogenstorageandδ15Nwithwoodyplantencroachmentinasubtropicalsavannaparklandlandscape.JournalofGeophysicalResearch,115.
![Page 118: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/118.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-118
Bouwman,A.F.,L.J.M.Boumans,andN.H.Batjes.2002.EmissionsofN2OandNOfromfertilizedfields:Summaryofavailablemeasurementdata.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,16(4):1058.
Bowman,R.A.,andR.L.Anderson.2002.ConservationReserveProgram:EffectsonsoilorganiccarbonandpreservationwhenconvertingbacktocroplandinnortheasternColorado.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,57(2):121‐126.
Brandle,J.,L.Hodges,J.Tyndall,andR.Sudmeyer.2009.Windbreakpractices.InNorthAmericanAgroforestry,anintegratedscienceandpractice,G.HE(ed.).Madison,WI:AmericanSocietyofAgronomy.
Brandle,J.R.,B.B.Johnson,andT.Akeson.1992.Fieldwindbreaks:Aretheyeconomical?JournalofProductionAgriculture,5:393‐398.
Brandt,L.,J.King,S.Hobbie,D.Milchunas,etal.2010.TheRoleofPhotodegradationinSurfaceLitterDecompositionAcrossaGrasslandEcosystemPrecipitationGradient.Ecosystems,13(5):765‐781.
Breitenbeck,G.A.,andJ.M.Bremner.1986a.Effectsofvariousnitrogenfertilizersonemissionofnitrousoxidefromsoils.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,2(4):195‐199.
Breitenbeck,G.A.,andJ.M.Bremner.1986b.Effectsofrateanddepthoffertilizerapplicationonemissionofnitrousoxidefromsoilfertilizedwithanhydrousammonia.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,2(4):201‐204.
Bremer,D.J.,andJ.M.Ham.2010.NetCarbonFluxesOverBurnedandUnburnedNativeTallgrassPrairie.RangelandEcology&Management,63(1):72‐81.
Bremner,J.M.,G.A.Breitenbeck,andA.M.Blackmer.1981.EffectofNitrapyrinonEmissionofNitrousOxidefromSoilFertilizedwithAnhydrousAmmonia.GeophysicalResearchLetters,8(4):353‐356.
Briske,D.D.,J.D.Derner,J.R.Brown,S.D.Fuhlendorf,etal.2008.RotationalGrazingonRangelands:ReconciliationofPerceptionandExperimentalEvidence.RangelandEcology&Management,61:3‐17.
Briske,D.D.,N.F.Sayre,L.Huntsinger,M.Fernandez‐Gimenez,etal.2011.Origin,persistence,andresolutionoftherotationalgrazingdebate:Integratinghumandimensionsintorangelandresearch.RangelandEcology&Management,64:325‐334.
Broadbent,F.E.1960.FactorsinfluencingthedecompositionoforganicsoilsoftheCaliforniadelta:UniversityofCalifornia.
Bronson,K.F.,A.R.Mosier,andS.R.Bishnoi.1992.NitrousOxideEmissionsinIrrigatedCornasAffectedbyNitrificationInhibitors.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,56(1):161‐165.
Brown,J.,J.Angerer,S.W.Salley,R.Blaisdell,etal.2010.ImprovingestimatesofrangelandcarbonsequestrationpotentialintheUSSouthwest.RangelandEcology&Management,61(1):147‐154.
Brown,J.R.2010.EcologicalSites:TheirHistory,Status,andFuture.Rangelands,32(6):5‐8.Burford,J.R.,R.J.Dowdell,andR.Crees.1981.Emissionofnitrousoxidetotheatmospherefrom
direct‐drilledandploughedclaysoils.JournaloftheScienceofFoodandAgriculture,32(3):219‐223.
Burton,D.L.,X.Li,andC.A.Grant.2008a.InfluenceoffertilizernitrogensourceandmanagementpracticeonN2OemissionsfromtwoBlackChernozemicsoils.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:219‐227.
Burton,D.L.,B.J.Zebarth,K.M.Gillarn,andJ.A.MacLeod.2008b.EffectofsplitapplicationoffertilizernitrogenonN2Oemissionsfrompotatoes.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:229‐239.
Cairns,M.A.,S.Brown,E.H.Helmer,andG.A.Baumgardner.1997.Rootbiomassallocationintheworld'suplandforests.Oecologia,111(1).
![Page 119: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/119.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-119
Cardenas,L.M.,R.Thorman,N.Ashlee,M.Butler,etal.2010.QuantifyingannualN2Oemissionfluxesfromgrazedgrasslandunderarangeofinorganicfertilisernitrogeninputs.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,136:218‐226.
Case,S.D.C.,N.McNamara,D.Reay,andJ.Whitaker.2013.CanbiocharreducesoilgreenhousegasemissionsfromaMiscanthusbioenergycrop?GCBBioenergy,6(1):76‐89.
CAST.2004.ClimateChangeandGreenhouseGasMitigation:ChallengesandOpportunitiesforAgriculture.Ames,Iowa:CouncilforAgriculturalScienceandTechnology.
CAST.2011.CarbonSequestrationandGreenhouseGasFluxesinAgriculture:ChallengesandOpportunities:CouncilforAgriculturalScienceandTechnology.
Cavigelli,M.,andT.Parkin.2012.CroplandManagementContributionstoGreenhouseGasFlux:CentralandEasternU.S.InManagingAgriculturalGreenhouseGasesM.Liebig,A.FranzluebbersandR.Follett(eds.).London,UK:AcademicPress.
Cayuela,M.L.,L.vanZweiten,B.P.Singh,S.Jeffrey,etal.2010.UnweatheredWoodBiocharImpactonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromaBovine‐Urine‐AmendedPastureSoil.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74:852‐860.
Chan,A.S.K.,andT.B.Parkin.2001.Effectoflanduseonmethanefluxfromsoil.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,30(3):786‐797.
Chang,C.,C.M.Cho,andD.H.Janzen.1998.Nitrousoxideemissionfromlong‐termmanuredsoils.SoilScienceSocietyAmericaJournal,62:677‐682.
Chen‐Ching,C.1996.TheN2Oemissionfrompaddysoil:Effectsofinorganicnitrogenfertilizerandricevarieties.JournaloftheAgriculturalAssociationofChina,174:111‐133.
Chen,D.,Y.Li,P.R.Grace,andA.Mosier.2008.N2Oemissionsfromagriculturallands:asynthesisofsimulationapproachesPlantandSoil,309:169‐189.
Cheng,K.,S.M.Ogle,W.J.Parton,andG.Pan.2013.PredictingmethanogenesisfromricepaddiesusingtheDAYCENTecosystemmodel.EcologicalModeling,261‐262:19‐31.
Cheng,W.,Y.Nakajima,S.Sudo,H.Akiyama,etal.2002.N2OandNOemissionsfromafieldofChinesecabbageasinfluencedbybandapplicationofureaorcontrolled‐releaseureafertilizers.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,63:231‐238.
Chu,H.Y.,Y.Hosen,andK.Yagi.2007.NO,N2O,CH4andfluxesinwinterbarleyfieldofJapaneseAndisolasaffectedbyNfertilizermanagement.SoilBiology&Biochemistry,39:330‐339.
Clark,J.T.,J.R.Russell,D.L.Karlen,P.L.Singleton,etal.2004.Soilsurfacepropertyandsoybeanyieldresponsetocornstovergrazing.AgronomyJournal,96:1364‐1371.
Clough,T.J.,J.E.Bertram,J.L.Ray,L.M.Condron,etal.2010.UnweatheredWoodBiocharImpactonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromaBovine‐Urine‐AmendedPastureSoil.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(3):852‐860.
Conant,R.,J.Six,andK.Paustian.2003.LanduseeffectsonsoilcarbonfractionsinthesoutheasternUnitedStates.I.Management‐intensiveversusextensivegrazing.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,38(6):386‐392.
Conant,R.T.,K.Paustian,andE.T.Elliott.2001.Grasslandmanagementandconversionintograssland:Effectsonsoilcarbon.EcologicalApplications,11(2):343–355.
Conant,R.T.,M.Easter,K.Paustian,A.Swan,etal.2007.ImpactsofperiodictillageonsoilCstocks:Asynthesis.Soil&TillageResearch,95(1‐2):1‐10.
Conant,R.T.,M.G.Ryan,G.I.Ågren,H.E.Birge,etal.2011.Temperatureandsoilorganicmatterdecompositionrates–synthesisofcurrentknowledgeandawayforward.GlobalChangeBiology,17(11):3392‐3404.
Creamer,C.,T.R.Filley,I.Kantola,andT.W.Boutton.2011.Controlsonsoilcarbonaccumulationduringwoodyplantencroachmentintograsslands:Evidencefromphysicalfractionation,soilrespiration,andtheisotopiccompositionofrespiredCO2.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,(inpress).
![Page 120: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/120.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-120
Cui,M.,X.C.Sun,C.X.Hu,H.J.Di,etal.2011.EffectiveMitigationofNitrateLeachingandNitrousOxideEmissionsinIntensiveVegetableProductionSystemsUsingaNitrificationInhibitor,Dicyandiamide.JournalofSoilsandSediments,11(5):722‐730.
Dahl,T.E.,andC.E.Johnson.1991.WetlandslossesintheUnitedStates,1780'sto1980's.ReporttotheCongress.Washington,DC:U.S.FishandWildlifeService.
Dai,X.,T.W.Ansley,M.Hailemichael,andK.E.Jessup.2006.Soilcarbonandnitrogenstorageinresponsetofireinatemperatemixed‐grasssavanna.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35:1620‐1628.
Daly,C.,M.Halbleib,J.I.Smith,W.P.Gibson,etal.2008.PhysiographicallysensitivemappingofclimatologicaltemperatureandprecipitationacrosstheconterminousUnitedStates.InternationalJournalofClimatology,28:2031‐2064.
Dao,T.H.,J.H.Stiegler,J.C.Banks,L.B.Boerngen,etal.2002.PostcontractlanduseeffectsonsoilcarbonandnitrogeninConservationReservegrasslands.AgronomyJournal,94:146‐152.
Davidson,E.,andI.Ackerman.1993.Changesinsoilcarboninventoriesfollowingcultivationofpreviouslyuntilledsoils.Biogeochemistry,20(3):161‐193.
Davidson,E.,M.Keller,H.E.Erickson,L.Verchot,etal.2000.Testingaconceptualmodelofsoilemissionsofnitrousandnitricoxide.Bioscience,50:667‐680.
Davidson,E.A.1991.Fluxesofnitrousoxideandnitricoxidefromterrestrialecosystems.InMicrobialProductionandConsumptionofGreenhouseGases:Methane,NitrousOxide,andHalomethanesD.E.RogersandW.B.Whitman(eds.).Washington:AmericanSocietyforMicrobiology.
Davidson,E.A.1992.Sourcesofnitricoxideandnitrousoxidefollowingwettingofdrysoil.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,56:95‐102.
deKlein,C.,R.S.A.Novoa,S.Ogle,K.A.Smith,etal.2006.Chapter11:N2Oemissionsfrommanagedsoil,andCO2emissionsfromlimeandureaapplication.In2006IPCCguidlinesfornationalgreenhousegasinventories,Vol.4:Agriculture,forestryandotherlanduse,S.Eggleston,L.Buendia,K.Miwa,T.NgaraandK.Tanabe(eds.).Kanagawa,Japan:IGES.
deKlein,C.A.M.,R.R.Sherlock,K.C.Cameron,andT.J.vanderWeerden.2001.NitrousoxideemissionsfromagriculturalsoilsinNewZealand—Areviewofcurrentknowledgeanddirectionsforfutureresearch.JournaloftheRoyalSocietyofNewZealand,31(3):543‐574.
deKlein,C.A.M.,K.C.Cameron,H.J.Di,G.Rys,etal.2011.RepeatedAnnualUseoftheNitrificationInhibitorDicyandiamide(Dcd)DoesNotAlterItsEffectivenessinReducingN2OEmissionsfromCowUrine.AnimalFeedScienceandTechnology,166‐167:480‐491.
DelGrosso,S.,W.Parton,A.Mosier,D.S.Ojima,etal.2000a.GeneralCH4oxidationmodelandcomparisonsofCH4oxidationinnaturalandmanagedsystems.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,14:999‐1019.
DelGrosso,S.,S.Ogle,W.Parton,andF.J.Breidt.2010.EstimatinguncertaintyinN2OemissionsfromU.S.croplandsoils.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,24(1).
DelGrosso,S.J.,W.J.Parton,A.R.Mosier,D.S.Ojima,etal.2000b.GeneralmodelforN2OandN2gasemissionsfromsoilsduetodenitrification.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,14:1045‐1060.
DelGrosso,S.J.,A.R.Mosier,W.J.Parton,andD.S.Ojima.2005.DAYCENTmodelanalysisofpastandcontemporarysoilN2OandnetgreenhousegasfluxformajorcropsintheUSA.SoilTillageResearch,83:9‐24.
DelGrosso,S.J.,A.D.Halvorson,andW.J.Parton.2008a.TestingDAYCENTModelSimulationsofCornYieldsandNitrousOxideEmissionsinIrrigatedTillageSystemsinColorado.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,37(4):1383‐1389.
DelGrosso,S.J.,T.Wirth,S.M.Ogle,andW.J.Parton.2008b.EstimatingAgriculturalNitrousOxideEmissions.EOS,Transactions,AmericanGeophysicalUnion,89(51):529‐540.
![Page 121: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/121.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-121
DelGrosso,S.J.,D.S.Ojima,W.J.Parton,E.Stehfest,etal.2009.GlobalscaleDAYCENTmodelanalysisofgreenhousegasemissionsandmitigationstrategiesforcroppedsoils.GlobalandPlanetaryChange,67(1‐2):44‐50.
DelGrosso,S.J.,W.J.Parton,C.A.Keough,andM.Reyes‐Fox.2011.SpecialFeaturesoftheDayCentModelingPackageandAdditionalProceduresforParameterization,Calibration,Validation,andApplications.InMethodsofIntroducingSystemModelsintoAgriculturalResearch,L.R.AhujaandL.Ma(eds.).Madison,WI:SoilScienceSocietyofAmerica.
Delgado,J.A.,andA.R.Mosier.1996.MitigationAlternativestoDecreaseNitrousOxidesEmissionsandUrea‐NitrogenLossandTheirEffectonMethaneFlux.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,25(5):1105‐1111.
Delgado,J.A.,A.R.Mosier,R.H.Follett,R.F.Follet,etal.1996.EffectsofNmanagementonN2OandCH4fluxesand15N.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,46(2):127‐134.
DeLonge,M.S.,R.Ryals,andW.L.Silver.2013.ALifecycleModeltoEvaluateCarbonSequestrationPotentialandGreenhouseGasDynamicsofManagedGrasslands.EcosystemsandEnvironment,16:962‐979.
Dendooven,L.,E.Bonhomme,R.Merckx,andK.Vlassak.1998.Injectionofpigslurryanditseffectsondynamicsofnitrogenandcarboninaloamysoilunterlaboratoryconditions.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,27(1):5‐8.
Denef,K.,C.E.Stewart,J.Brenner,andK.Paustian.2008.Doeslong‐termcenter‐pivotirrigationincreasesoilcarbonstocksinsemi‐aridagro‐ecosystems?Geoderma,145(1‐2):121‐129.
Derner,J.D.,T.W.Boutton,andD.D.Brisk.2006.GrazingandecosystemcarbonstorageintheNorthAmericanGreatPlains.PlantSoil,280(77‐90).
Derner,J.D.,andG.E.Schuman.2007.Carbonsequestrationandrangelands:Asynthesisoflandmanagementandprecipitationeffects.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,62(2):77–85.
Deverel,S.J.,andS.Rojstaczer.1996.SubsidenceofAgriculturalLandsintheSacramento‐SanJoaquinDelta,California:RoleofAqueousandGaseousCarbonFluxes.WaterResourcesResearch,32(8):2359‐2367.
Deverel,S.J.,B.Wang,andS.Rojstaczer.1998.Subsidenceoforganicsoils,Sacramento‐SanJoaquinDelta,California.InLandSubsidenceCaseStudiesandCurrentResearch,J.W.Borchers(ed.):AssociationofEngineeringGeologistSpecialPublicationNo.8.
Devito,K.J.,D.Fitzgerald,A.R.Hill,andR.Aravena.2000.Nitratedynamicsinrelationtolithologyandhydrologicflowpathinariverriparianzone.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,29(4):1075‐1084.
Ding,W.,Y.Cai,X.Cai,K.Yagi,etal.2007.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromanintensivelycultivatedmaize‐wheatrotationinsoilintheNorthChinaPlain.ScienceandtheTotalEnvironment,373.
Dittert,K.,R.Bol,R.King,D.Chadwick,etal.2001.UseofanovelnitrificationinhibitortoreducenitrousoxideemissionfromN15‐labelleddairyslurryinjectedintosoil.RapidCommunicationsinMassSpectrometry,15:1291‐1296.
Dixon,R.K.,A.M.Solomon,S.Brown,R.A.Houghton,etal.1994.CarbonPoolsandFluxofGlobalForestEcosystems.Science,263(5144):185‐190.
Dobbie,K.E.,andK.A.Smith.2003.ImpactofDifferentFormsofNFertilizeronN2OEmissionsfromIntensiveGrassland.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,67(1):37‐46.
Doran,J.W.,E.T.Elliott,andK.Paustian.1998.Soilmicrobialactivity,nitrogencycling,andlong‐termchangesinorganiccarbonpoolsasrelatedtofallowtillagemanagement.Soil&TillageResearch,49:3‐18.
Dorr,H.,L.Katru,andI.Levin.1993.Soiltextureparameterizationofthemethaneuptakeinaeratedsoils.Chemosphere,26(697‐713).
![Page 122: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/122.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-122
Dosskey,M.G.,P.Vidon,N.P.Gurwick,C.J.Allan,etal.2010.Theroleofriparianvegetationinprotectingandimprovingchemicalwaterqualityinstreams.JournaloftheAmericanWaterResourcesAssociation,46(2):261‐277.
Drury,C.F.,W.D.Reynolds,C.S.Tan,T.W.Welacky,etal.2006.EmissionsofNitrousOxideandCarbonDioxide.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70(2):570‐581.
Dunfield,P.,E.Topp,C.Archambault,andR.Knowles.1995.EffectofnitrogenfertilizersandmoisturecontentonCH4andN2Ofluxesinahumisol:Measurementsinthefieldandintactsoilcores.Biogeochemistry,29(3):199‐222.
Dunn,B.H.,A.J.Smart,R.N.Gates,P.S.Johnson,etal.2010.Long‐TermProductionandProfitabilityFromGrazingCattleintheNorthernMixedGrassPrairie.RangelandEcology&Management,63(2):233‐242.
Duxbury,J.M.,D.R.Bouldin,R.E.Terry,andR.L.Tate.1982.Emissionsofnitrousoxidefromsoils.Nature,298(5873):462‐464.
Eagle,A.J.,L.R.Henry,L.P.Olander,K.Haugen‐Kozyra,etal.2010.GreenhouseGasMitigationPotentialofAgriculturalLandManagementintheUnitedStates.ASynthesisoftheLiterature:NicholasInstituteEnvironmentalPolicySolutions.
Eghball,B.,L.N.Mielke,D.L.McCallister,andJ.W.Doran.1994.Distributionoforganiccarbonandinorganicnitrogeninasoilundervarioustillageandcropsequences.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,49(2):201‐205.
Elgood,Z.,W.D.Robertson,S.L.Schiff,andR.Elgood.2010.Greenhousegasproductioninastreambedbioreactorfornitrateremoval.EcologicalEngineering,36:1575‐1580.
Elmi,A.,C.Madramootoo,C.Hamel,andA.Liu.2003.Denitrificationandnitrousoxidetonitrousoxideplusdinitrogenratiosinthesoilprofileunderthreetillagesystems.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,38(6):340‐348.
Emmerich,W.E.2003.Carbondioxidefluxesinasemiaridenvironmentwithhighcarbonatesoils.AgriculturalandForestMeteorology,116:91‐102.
Engel,R.,D.L.Liang,R.Wallander,andA.Bembenek.2010.InfluenceofUreaFertilizerPlacementonNitrousOxideProductionfromaSiltLoamSoil.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(1):115‐125.
Entry,J.A.,R.E.Sojka,andG.E.Shewmaker.2002.Managementofirrigatedagriculturetoincreaseorganiccarbonstorageinsoil.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,66:1957‐1964.
Entry,J.A.,R.E.Sojka,andG.E.Shewmaker.2004.Irrigationincreasesinorganiccarboninagriculturalsoils.EnvironmentalManagement,33:S309‐S317.
Errebhi,M.,C.J.Rosen,S.C.Gupta,andD.E.Birong.1998.PotatoYieldResponseandNitrateLeachingasInfluencedbyNitrogenManagement.AgronomyJournal,90(1):10‐15.
ERS.2011.U.S.FertilizerUseandPriceUSDAEconomicResearchService.RetrievedJune17fromhttp://www.ers.usda.gov/Data/FertilizerUse/.
Euliss,N.H.,Jr.,N.Bliss,S.Bristol,W.Dean,etal.2006.TheEfficacyofaNationalModeltoAssessandQuantifytheEcosystemServicesProvidedbyUSDAandUSDOIConservationPrograms:ThePrairiePotholeRegionasaRegionalPilot.Jamestown,ND:U.S.GeologicalSurvey,NorthernPrairieWildlifeResearchCenter.
Fargione,J.,J.Hill,D.Tilman,S.Polasky,etal.2008.LandClearingandtheBiofuelCarbonDebt.Science,319(5867):1235‐1238.
Feng,J.,C.Chen,Y.Zhang,Z.Song,etal.2013.Impactsofcroppingpracticesonyield‐scaledgreenhousegasemissionsfromricefieldsinChina:Ameta‐analysis.Agriculture.EcosystemsandEnvironment,164:220‐228.
Fertilizer101.DictionaryRetrievedfromhttp://www.fertilizer101.org/dictionary/.Fierer,N.,andJ.P.Schimel.2002.Effectsofdrying‐rewettingfrequencyonsoilcarbonandnitrogen
transformations.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,34(6):777‐787.
![Page 123: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/123.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-123
Firestone,M.,andE.Davidson.1989.MicrobiologicalbasisofNOandN2Oproductionandconsumptioninsoil.InExchangeoftracegasesbetweenterrestrialecosystemsandtheatmosphere,M.AndreaeandD.Schimel(eds.).Chichester,UK:JohnWiley&Sons.
Fitzgerald,G.J.,K.M.Scow,andJ.E.Hill.2000.FallowseasonstrawandwatermanagementeffectsonmethaneemissionsinCaliforniarice.GlobalBiogeochem.Cycles,14(3).
Fitzgerald,G.J.,Scow,K.M.,Hill,J.E.2000.FallowseasonstrawandwatermanagementeffectsonmethaneemissionsinCaliforniarice.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,14(3):767‐776.
Flechard,C.R.,P.Ambus,U.Skiba,R.M.Rees,etal.2007.EffectsofclimateandmanagementintensityonnitrousoxideemissionsingrasslandsystemsacrossEurope.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,121(1‐2):135‐152.
Flessa,H.,andF.Beese.2000.Laboratoryestimatesoftracegasemissionsfollowingsurfaceapplicationandinjectionofcattleslurry.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,29(1):262‐268.
Follett,R.F.2001.Soilmanagementconceptsandcarbonsequestrationincroplandsoils.Soil&TillageResearch,61(1‐2):77–92.
Follett,R.F.,J.M.Kimble,andR.Lal.2001.ThepotentialofU.S.grazinglandstosequestercarbonandmitigatethegreenhouseeffect.BocaRaton,FL:CRCPress.
Follett,R.F.,J.M.Kimble,E.G.Pruessner,S.Samson‐Liebig,etal.2009.SoilorganicCstockswithdepthandlanduseatvariousUSsites.Madison,WI:ASA‐CSSA‐SSSA.
Fornara,D.A.,S.Steinbeiss,N.P.McNamara,G.Gleixner,etal.2011.Increasesinsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationcanreducetheglobalwarmingpotentialoflong‐termlimingtopermanentgrassland.GlobalChangeBiology,17(5):1925‐1934.
Franzluebbers,A.J.,J.A.Stuedemann,H.H.Schomberg,andS.R.Wilkinson.2000.SoilorganicCandNpoolsunderlong‐termpasturemanagementintheSouthernPiedmontUSA.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,32(4):469‐478.
Franzluebbers,A.J.,andJ.L.Steiner.2002.Climaticinfluencesonsoilorganiccarbonstoragewithnotillage.InAgriculturalPracticesandPoliciesforCarbonSequestrationinSoil,J.M.Kimble,R.LalandR.F.Follett(eds.).BocaRaton,FL:CRCPress.
Franzluebbers,A.J.2005.SoilorganiccarbonsequestrationandagriculturalgreenhousegasemissionsinthesoutheasternUSA.Soil&TillageResearch,83(1):120–147.
Franzluebbers,A.J.,andJ.A.Stuedemann.2009.Soil‐profileorganiccarbonandtotalnitrogenduring12yearsofpasturemanagementintheSouthernPiedmontUSA.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,129(1‐3):28‐36.
Franzluebbers,A.J.2010a.AchievingsoilorganiccarbonsequestrationwithconservationagriculturalsystemsinthesoutheasternUnitedStates.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):347–357.
Franzluebbers,A.J.2010b.SoilorganiccarboninmanagedpasturesofthesoutheasternUnitedStatesofAmerica.InGrasslandcarbonsequestration:Management,policyandeconomics,M.Abberton,R.T.ConantandC.Batello(eds.).Rome,Italy:FAO,Integr.CropManage.
Franzluebbers,A.J.,L.B.Owens,G.C.Sigua,C.A.Cambardella,etal.2012.Soilorganiccarbonunderpasturemanagement.InManagingagriculturalGHGs:CoordinatedagriculturalresearchthroughGRACEnettoaddressourchangingclimate.SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Fujinuma,R.,R.T.Venterea,andC.J.Rosen.2011.BroadcastureareducesN2OemissionsbutincreasesNOemissionscomparedwithconventionalandshallow‐appliedanhydrousammoniainacoarse‐texturedsoil.SubmittedtoJournalofEnvironmentalQuality.
Gagnon,B.,andN.Ziadi.2010.Graincornandsoilnitrogenresponsestosidedressnitrogensourcesandapplication.AgronomyJournal,102:1014‐1022.
Gagnon,B.,N.Ziadi,P.Rochette,M.H.Chantigny,etal.2011.FertilizerSourceInfluencedNitrousOxideEmissionsfromaClaySoilunderCorn.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,75(2):595‐604.
![Page 124: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/124.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-124
Garrett,H.E.2009.NorthAmericanAgroforestry:AnIntegratedScienceandPractice,2nded.Madison,WI:AmericanSocietyofAgronomy,Inc.
Gebhart,D.L.,H.B.Johnson,H.S.Mayeux,andH.W.Polley.1994.TheCRPincreasessoilorganiccarbon.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,49(5):488‐492.
Gehl,R.J.,J.P.Schmidt,L.R.Stone,A.J.Schlegel,etal.2005.Insitumeasurementsofnitrateleachingimplicatepoornitrogenandirrigationmanagementonsandysoils.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,34:2243‐2254.
Gelfand,I.,T.Zenone,P.Jasrotia,J.Chen,etal.2011.CarbondebtofConservationReserveProgram(CRP)grasslandsconvertedtobioenergyproduction.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciences,108(33):13864‐13869.
Ghosh,S.,D.Majumdar,andM.C.Jain.2003.MethaneandNitrousOxideEmissionsfromanIrrigatedRiceofNorthIndia.Chemosphere,51(3):181‐195.
Gill,R.A.,I.C.Burke,W.K.Lauenroth,andD.Milchunas.2002.Longevityandturnoverofrootsintheshortgrasssteppe:influenceofdiameteranddepth..PlantEcology,159:241‐251.
Gilley,J.E.,J.W.Doran,D.L.Karlen,andT.C.Kaspar.1997.Runoff,erosion,andsoilqualitycharacteristicsofaformerConservationReserveProgramsite.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,52(3):189‐193.
Giltrap,D.,C.Li,andS.Saggar.2010.DNDC:Aprocess‐basedmodelforgreenhousegasfluxesfromagriculturalsoils.Agriculture,EcosystemsandEnvironment,136:292‐300.
Gleason,R.,N.H.Euliss,Jr.,B.A.Tangen,M.Laubhan,etal.2009.USDAConservationProgramandPracticeEffectsonWetlandEcosystemServicesinthePrairiePotholeRegion.EcologicalApplications,21(3):S65‐S81.
Gold,M.A.,andH.E.Garrett.2009.Agroforestrynomenclature,conceptsandpractices.Madison,WI:AmericanSocietyofAgronomy.
Grace,P.R.,D.Rowlings,I.Rochester,R.Kiese,etal.2010.NitrousoxideemissionsfromirrigatedcottonsoilsofnorthernAustralia.InSoilSolutionsforaChangingWorld:Proceedingsofthe19thWorldCongressofSoilScience,1‐6August2010,R.GilkesandN.Prakongkep(eds.).Brisbane,Australia.
Grandy,A.S.,T.D.Loecke,S.Parr,andG.P.Robertson.2006.Long‐TermTrendsinNitrousOxideEmissions,SoilNitrogen,andCropYieldsofTillandNo‐TillCroppingSystems.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35(4):1487‐1495.
Greenwood,K.L.,andB.M.McKenzie.2001.Grazingeffectsonsoilphysicalpropertiesandtheconsequencesforpastures:areview.AustralianJournalofExperimentalAgriculture,41(8):1231‐1250.
Gregg,J.S.,andR.C.Izaurralde.2010.Effectofcropresidueharvestonlong‐termcropyield,soilerosionandnutrientbalance:trade‐offsforasustainablebioenergyfeedstock.Biofuels,1(1):69‐83.
Griggs,B.R.,R.J.Norman,C.E.Wilson,andN.A.Slaton.2007.AmmoniaVolatilizationandNitrogenUptakeforConventionalandConservationTilledDry‐Seeded,Delayed‐FloodRice.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,71(3):745‐751.
Groffman,P.M.1985.NitrificationandDenitrificationinConventionalandNo‐TillageSoils.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,49(2):329‐334.
Hadi,A.,O.Jumadi,K.Inubushi,andK.Yagi.2008.MitigationOptionsforN2OEmissionfromaCornFieldinKalimantan,Indonesia.Soilscienceandplantnutrition,54(4):644‐649.
Haile,S.G.,V.D.Nair,andP.K.R.Nair.2010.ContributionoftreestocarbonstorageinsoilsofsilvopastoralsystemsinFlorida,USA.GlobalChangeBiology,16(1):427‐438.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.A.Reule.2008.Nitrogen,Tillage,andCropRotationEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,37(4):1337‐1344.
![Page 125: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/125.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-125
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andF.Alluvione.2010a.NitrogenSourceEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedNo‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(5):1554‐1562.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andF.Alluvione.2010b.TillageandInorganicNitrogenSourceEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromIrrigatedCroppingSystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):436‐445.
Halvorson,A.D.,S.J.DelGrosso,andC.P.Jantalia.2011.NitrogenSourceEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromStrip‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40(6):1775‐1786.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.D.Grosso.2012.NitrogenSourceandPlacementEffectsonSoilNitrousOxideEmissionsfromNo‐TillCorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,41(5):1349‐1360.
Halvorson,A.D.,andS.J.DelGrosso.2013.Nitrogenplacementandsourceeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsandyieldsofirrigatedcorn.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,42(Inpress).
Halvorson,A.D.,C.S.Snyder,A.D.Blaylock,andS.J.DelGrosso.Inreview.EnhancedEfficiencyNitrogenFertilizers:PotentialRoleinNitrousOxideEmissionMitigation.AgronomyJournal.
Hamilton,S.K.,A.L.Kurzman,C.Arango,L.Jin,etal.2007.Evidenceforcarbonsequestrationbyagriculturalliming.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,21(2):GB2021.
Hao,X.,C.Chang,J.M.Carefoot,H.H.Janzen,etal.2001.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromanirrigatedsoilasaffectedbyfertilizerandstrawmanagement.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,60(1):1‐8.
Harden,J.W.,J.M.Sharpe,W.J.Parton,D.S.Ojima,etal.1999.Dynamicreplacementandlossofsoilcarbononerodingcropland.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,13:885‐901.
Harden,J.W.,A.A.Berhe,M.Torn,J.Harte,etal.2008.Soilerosion:datasayCsink.Science,320(5873):178‐179.
Harmoney,K.R.,K.J.Moore,J.R.George,E.C.Brummer,etal.1997.Determinationofpasturebiomassusingfourindirectmethods.AgronomyJournal,89:665‐672.
Hartz,T.K.,andP.R.Johnstone.2006.Nitrogenavailablefromhigh‐nitrogen‐containingorganicfertilizers.HortTechnology,16:39‐42.
Heitschmidt,R.K.,andC.A.J.Taylor.1991.Livestockproduction.InGrazingManagement:AnEcologicalPerspective,R.K.H.a.J.W.Stuth(ed.).Portland,OR:TimberPress.
Hénault,C.,A.Grossel,B.Mary,M.Roussel,etal.2012.Nitrousoxideemissionbyagriculturalsoils:areviewofspatialandtemporalvariabilityformitigation.Pedosphere,22:426‐433.
Hoben,J.P.,R.J.Gehl,N.Millar,P.R.Grace,etal.2011.Nonlinearnitrousoxide(N2O)responsetonitrogenfertilizerinon‐farmcorncropsoftheUSMidwest.GlobalChangeBiology,17(2):1140‐1152.
Hollister,E.B.,C.W.Schadt,A.V.Palumbo,R.JamesAnsley,etal.2010.StructuralandfunctionaldiversityofsoilbacterialandfungalcommunitiesfollowingwoodyplantencroachmentinthesouthernGreatPlains.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,42(10):1816‐1824.
Hosen,Y.,K.Paisancharoen,andH.Tsuruta.2002.EffectsofdeepapplicationofureaonNOandN2OemissionsfromanAndisol.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,63(2):197‐206.
Hou,A.X.,andH.Tsuruta.2003.NitrousoxideandnitricoxidefluxesfromanuplandfieldinJapan:effectofureatype,placement,andcropresidues.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,65:191‐200.
Houghton,R.A.,J.L.Hackler,andK.T.Lawrence.1999.TheU.S.CarbonBudget:ContributionsfromLand‐UseChange.Science,285(5427):574‐578.
Huang,Y.,R.L.Sass,andF.M.F.Jr.1997.MethaneemissionfromTexasricepaddysoils.1.Quantitativemulti‐yeardependenceofCH4emissiononsoil,cultivarandgrainyield.GlobalChangeBiology,3:479‐489.
Hue,N.V.OrganicFertilizersinSustainableAgricultureRetrievedfromhttp://www.ctahr.hawaii.edu/huen/hue_organic.htm.
![Page 126: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/126.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-126
Hultgreen,G.,andP.Leduc.2003.Theeffectofnitrogenfertilizerplacement,formulation,timing,andrateongreenhousegasemissionsandagronomicperformance:AgricultureAgri‐FoodCanada,PrairieAgriculturalMachineryInstitute.
Hyatt,C.R.,R.T.Venterea,C.J.Rosen,M.McNearney,etal.2010.Polymer‐CoatedUreaMaintainsPotatoYieldsandReducesNitrousOxideEmissionsinaMinnesotaLoamySand.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74(2):419‐428.
Ingram,L.J.,P.D.Stahl,G.E.Schuman,J.S.Buyer,etal.2008.GrazingImpactsOnSoilCarbonAndMicrobialCommunitiesInAMixed‐grassEcosystem.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,72(4):939‐948.
IPCC.1997.Revised1996IPCCGuidelinesforNationalGreenhouseGasInventories,PreparedbytheNationalGreenhouseGasInventoriesProgramme.Bracknell,UK:IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.http://www.ipcc‐nggip.iges.or.jp/public/2006gl/vol4.html.
IPCC.2000.LandUse,Land‐UseChange,andForestry.UK:IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.
IPCC.2001.ClimateChange2001:TheScientificBasis.ContributionforWorkingGroupItotheThirdAssessmentReportoftheIntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.NewYork,NY.
IPCC.2006.IPCCGuidelinesforNationalGreenhouseGasInventories.Japan:IGES.IPCC.2007.ContributionofWorkingGroupsI,IIandIIItotheFourthAssessmentReportofthe
IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChangeCoreWritingTeam.Geneva,Switzerland:IntergovernmentalPanelonClimateChange.
Izaurralde,R.C.,W.B.McGill,J.A.Robertson,N.G.Juma,etal.2001.CarbonBalanceoftheBretonClassicalPlotsoverHalfaCentury.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,65:431‐441.
Izaurralde,R.C.,J.R.Williams,W.M.Post,A.Thomson,etal.2007.Long‐termmodelingofsoilCerosionandsequestrationatthesmallwatershedscale.ClimaticChange,80:73‐90.
Jaffé,R.,Y.Ding,J.Niggemann,A.V.Vähätalo,etal.2013.GlobalCharcoalMobilizationfromSoilsviaDissolutionandRiverineTransporttotheOceans.Science,340(6130):345‐347.
Jambert,C.,R.Delmas,D.Serça,L.Thouron,etal.1997.N2OandCH4emissionsfromfertilizedagriculturalsoilsinsouthwestFrance.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,48(1):105‐114.
Jelinski,N.A.,andC.J.Kucharik.2009.Land‐useEffectsonSoilCarbonandNitrogenonaU.S.MidwesternFloodplain.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,73(1):217‐225.
Jenkins,J.C.,D.C.Chojnacky,L.S.Heath,andR.A.Birdsey.2003.National‐scalebiomassestimatorsforUnitedStatestreespecies.ForestScience,49(1):12‐35.
Jenkins,J.C.,D.C.Chojnacky,L.S.Heath,andR.A.Birdsey.2004.Comprehensivedatabaseofdiameter‐basedbiomassregressionsforNorthAmericantreespecies.NewtownSquare,PA:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,ForestService,NorthernResearchStation.
Ji,Y.,G.Liu,J.Ma,H.Xu,etal.2012.Effectofcontrolled‐releasefertilizeronnitrousoxideemissionfromawinterwheatfield.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,94:111‐122.
Jiang,J.Y.,Z.H.Hu,W.J.Sun,andY.Huang.2010.NitrousoxideemissionsfromChinesecroplandfertilizedwitharangeofslow‐releasenitrogencompounds.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,135:216‐225.
Jongedyk,H.A.,R.B.Hickok,I.D.Mayer,andN.K.Ellis.1950.SubsidenceofmucksoilsinnorthernIndiana.Indiana:PurdueUniversityAgriculturalExperimentStation.
Jumadi,O.,Y.Hala,A.Muis,A.Ali,etal.2008.InfluencesofChemicalFertilizersandaNitrificationInhibitoronGreenhouseGasFluxesinaCorn(ZeaMaysL.)FieldinIndonesia.Microbesandenvironments,23(1):29‐34.
Kaewpradit,W.,B.Toomsan,P.Vityakon,V.Limpinuntana,etal.2008.RegulatingmineralNreleaseandgreenhousegasemissionsbymixinggroundnutresiduesandricestrawunderfieldconditions.EuropeanJournalofSoilScience,59(4):640‐652.
![Page 127: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/127.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-127
Kaiser,E.‐A.,andR.Ruser.2000.NitrousoxideemissionsfromarablesoilsinGermany—Anevaluationofsixlong‐termfieldexperiments.JournalofPlantNutritionandSoilScience,163(3):249‐259.
Kaiser,E.A.,K.Kohrs,M.Kücke,E.Schnug,etal.1998.Nitrousoxidereleasefromarablesoil:importanceofN‐fertilization,cropsandtemporalvariation.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,30:1553‐1563.
Kallenbach,C.M.,D.E.Rolston,andW.R.Horwath.2010.CovercroppingaffectssoilN2OandCO2emissionsdifferentlydependingontypeofirrigation.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,137(3‐4):251‐260.
Kammann,C.,L.Grünhage,C.Müller,S.Jacobi,andH.‐J.Jäger.1998.SeasonalvariabilityandmitigationoptionsforN2Oemissionsfromdifferentlymanagedgrasslands.EnvironmentalPollution,102(S1):179‐186.
Karki,U.,M.S.Goodman,andS.S.Sladden.2009.Nitrogensourceinfluencesonforageandsoilinyoungsouthern‐pinesilvopasture.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,131(70‐76).
Karlen,D.L.,M.J.Rosek,J.C.Gardner,D.L.Allan,etal.1999.ConservationReserveProgrameffectsonsoilqualityindicators.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,54(1):439‐444.
Kasimir‐Klemedtsson,Å.,L.Klemedtsson,K.Berglund,P.Martikainen,etal.1997.Greenhousegasemissionsfromfarmedorganicsoils:areview.SoilUseandManagement,13:245‐250.
Katayanagi,N.,Y.Furukawa,T.Fumoto,andY.Hosen.2012.ValidationoftheDNDC‐RicemodelbyusingCH4andN2Ofluxdatafromricecultivatedinpotsunderalternatewettinganddryingirrigationmanagement.Soilscienceandplantnutrition,58:360‐372.
Keeney,D.R.,andK.L.Sahrawat.1986.Nitrogentransformationsinfloodedsoils.FertilizerResearch,9:15‐38.
Keerthisinghe,D.G.,L.Xin‐Jian,L.Qi‐xiang,andA.R.Mosier.1995.EffectofencapsulatedcalciumcarbideandureaapplicationmethodsondenitrificationandNlossfromfloodedrice.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,45(1):31‐36.
Kelly,K.B.,F.A.Phillips,andR.Baigent.2008.ImpactofdicyandiamideapplicationonnitrousoxideemissionsfromurinepatchesinnorthernVictoria,Australia.AustralianJournalofExperimentalAgriculture,48:156‐159.
Kennedy,T.L.,E.Suddick,andJ.Six.2013.ReducednitrousoxideemissionsandincreasedyieldsinCaliforniatomatocroppingsystemsunderdripirrigationandfertigation.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,170:16‐27.
Kesik,M.,N.Brüggemann,R.Forkel,R.Kiese,etal.2006.FuturescenariosofN2OandNOemissionsfromEuropeanforestsoils.J.Geophys.Res.,111:2018‐2022.
Kessavalou,A.,R.A.Drijber,A.R.Mosier,J.W.Doran,etal.1998.Fluxesofcarbondioxide,nitrousoxide,andmethaneingrasssodandwinterwheat‐fallowtillagemanagement.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,27(5):1094‐1104.
Kiese,R.,C.Li,D.W.Hilbert,H.Papen,etal.2005.RegionalapplicationofPnET‐DNDCforestimatingtheN2OsourcetrengthoftropicrainforestsintheWetTropicsofAustralia.GlobalChangeBiology,11:128‐144.
Kim,D.‐G.2008.Nitrousoxideandmethanefluxesinriparianbuffersandadjacentcropfields:IowaStateUniversity.
Kim,D.‐G.,T.M.Isenhart,T.B.Parkin,R.C.Schultz,etal.2010.MethaneFluxInCroplandAndAdjacentRiparianBuffersWithDifferentVegetationCovers.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(1):97‐105.
Kim,D.‐G.,G.Hernandez‐Ramirez,andD.Giltrap.2013.Linearandnonlineardependencyofdirectnitrousoxideemissionsonfertilizernitrogeninput:ameta‐analysis.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,168:53‐65.
Kimetu,J.M.,andJ.Lehmann.2010.Stabilityandstabilisationofbiocharandgreenmanureinsoilwithdifferentorganiccarboncontents.AustralianJournalofSoilRes.,48:577‐585.
![Page 128: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/128.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-128
Kong,A.Y.,J.Six,D.C.Bryant,R.F.Denison,etal.2005.Therelationshipbetweencarboninput,aggregation,andsoilorganiccarbonstabilizationinsustainablecroppingsystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,69:1078‐1085.
Kong,A.Y.,andJ.Six.2010.Tracingcovercroprootversusresiduecarbonintosoilsfromconventional,low‐Input,andorganiccroppingsystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,74:1201‐1210.
Kool,D.M.,J.Dolfing,N.Wrage,andJ.W.VanGroenigen.2011.Nitrifierdenitrificationasadistinctandsignificantsourceofnitrousoxidefromsoil.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,43(1):174‐178.
Kravchenko,A.N.,andG.P.Robertson.2011.Whole‐profilesoilcarbonstocks:Thedangerofassumingtoomuchfromanalysesoftoolittle.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,75:235‐240.
Kucharik,C.J.2007.Impactofprairieageandsoilorderoncarbonandnitrogensequestration.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,71:430‐441.
Kumar,B.M.,andP.K.R.Nair.2011.CarbonSequestrationPotentialofAgroforestrySystems:OpportunitiesandChallenges.AdvancesinAgronomy,8.
Kumar,U.,M.C.Jain,H.Pathak,S.Kumar,etal.2000.NitrousOxideEmissionfromDifferentFertilizersandItsMitigationbyNitrificationInhibitorsinIrrigatedRice.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,32(6):474‐478.
Kurbatova,J.,C.Li,A.Varlagin,X.Xiao,etal.2008.ModelingcarbondynamicsintwoadjacentspruceforestswithdifferentsoilconditionsinRussia.Biogeosciences,5:969‐980.
Ladha,J.K.,C.K.Reddy,A.T.Padre,andC.v.Kessel.2011.RoleofNitrogenFertilizationinSustainingOrganicMatterinCultivatedSoils.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40:1756‐1766.
Laird,D.A.,P.Fleming,D.D.Davis,R.Horton,etal.2010.ImpactofbiocharamendmentsonthequalityofatypicalMidwesternagriculturalsoil.Geoderma,158(3–4):443–449.
Lal,R.,J.M.Kimble,R.F.Follett,andC.Cole.1998.ThepotentialofUScroplandtosequesterCandmitigatethegreenhouseeffect.Chelsea,MI:AnnArborSciencePublishers.
Lal,R.2003.Soilerosionandtheglobalcarbonbudget.EnvironmentInternational,29(4):437‐450.Lal,R.,M.Griffin,J.Apt,L.Lave,etal.2004.ManagingSoilCarbon.Science,304(5669):393.Lal,R.,andD.Pimentel.2008.Soilerosion:acarbonsinkorsource?Science,319(5866):1040‐1042.Lasco,R.D.,S.Ogle,J.Raison,L.Verchot,etal.2006.Chapter5:Cropland.In2006IPCCGuidelinesfor
NationalGreenhouseGasInventories,S.Eggleston,L.Buendia,K.Miwa,T.NgaraandK.Tanabe(eds.).Japan:IGES,IPCCNationalGreenhouseGasInventoriesProgram.
Lehmann,J.2007a.Ahandfulofcarbon.Nature,447:143‐144.Lehmann,J.2007b.Bio‐energyintheblack.FrontiersinEcologyandtheEnvironment,5(7):381‐387.Lemke,R.L.,R.C.Izaurralde,andM.Nyborg.1998.Seasonaldistributionofnitrousoxideemissions
fromsoilsintheParklandregion.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,62(5):1320‐1326.Lessard,V.C.2000.UpdatingIndianaannualforestinventoryandanalysisplotdatausingeastern
broadleafforestdiametergrowthmodels.ProceedingsoftheProceedingsoftheSecondAnnualForestInventoryandAnalysisSymposium,October17‐18,2000,SaltLakeCity,UT.
Lessard,V.C.,R.E.McRoberts,andM.R.Holdaway.2001.DiametergrowthmodelsusingMinnesotaforestinventoryandanalysisdata.ForestScience,47:301‐310.
Letica,S.A.,C.A.M.deKlein,C.J.Hoogendoorn,R.W.Tillman,etal.2010.Short‐termmeasurementofN2Oemissionsfromsheep‐grazedpasturereceivingincreasingratesoffertilisernitrogeninOtago,NewZealand.AnimalProductionScience,50:17‐24.
Levine,U.,K.Teal,G.Robertson,andT.M.Schmidt.2011.Agriculture’simpactonmicrobialdiversityandassociatedfluxesofcarbondioxideandmethane.InternationalSocietyforMicrobialEcology.
Li,C.,S.Frolking,andT.A.Frolking.1992.AModelofNitrousOxideEvolutionFromSoilDrivenbyRainfallEvents:2.ModelApplications.JournalofGeophysicalResearch,97(D9):9777‐9783.
![Page 129: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/129.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-129
Li,C.,J.Aber,F.Stange,K.Butterbach‐Bahl,etal.2000.Aprocess‐orientedmodelofN2OandNOemissionsfromforestsoils:1.ModeldevelopmentJ.Geophys.Res.,105(D4):4369–4384.
Li,C.,J.Cui,G.Sun,andC.Trettin.2004.ModelingImpactsofManagementonCarbonSequestrationandTraceGasEmissionsinForestedWetlandEcosystems.EnvironmentalManagement,33:S176‐S186.
Liao,J.D.,T.W.Boutton,andJ.D.Jastrow.2006.Storageanddynamicsofcarbonandnitrogeninsoilphysicalfractionsfollowingwoodyplantinvasionofgrassland.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,38(11):3184‐3196.
Liao,J.D.,andT.W.Boutton.2008.Soilmicrobialbiomassresponsetowoodyplantinvasionofgrassland.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,40(5):1207‐1216.
Liebig,M.A.,J.A.Morgan,J.D.Reeder,B.H.Ellert,etal.2005.GreenhousegascontributionsandmitigationpotentialofagriculturalpracticesinnorthwesternUSAandwesternCanada.Soil&TillageResearch,83(1):25‐52.
Liebig,M.A.,J.R.Gross,S.L.Kronberg,J.D.Hanson,etal.2006.Soilresponsetolong‐termgrazinginthenorthernGreatPlainsofNorthAmerica.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,115(1‐4):270‐276.
Liebig,M.A.,J.R.Gross,S.L.Kronberg,R.L.Phillips,etal.2010.Grazingmanagementcontributionstonetglobalwarmingpotential:along‐termevaluationintheNorthernGreatPlains.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,39(3):799‐809.
Liebig,M.A.,X.Dong,J.E.T.McLain,andC.J.Dell.2012.GreenhousegasfluxfrommanagedgrasslandsintheU.S.,Chapter3.3.InManagingagriculturalGHGs:CoordinatedagriculturalresearchthroughGRACEnettoaddressourchangingclimate.SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Lin,S.,J.Iqbal,R.Hu,J.Wu,etal.2011.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromrapefieldasaffectedbynitrogenfertilizermanagement:acasestudyincentralChina.AtmosphericEnvironment,45:1775‐1779.
Lindau,C.W.,P.K.Bollich,andR.D.DeLaune.1995.EffectofricevarietyonmethaneemissionfromLouisianarice.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,54(1‐2):109‐114.
Lindau,C.W.,P.Wickersham,R.D.DeLaune,J.W.Collins,etal.1998.Methaneandnitrousoxideevolutionand15Nand226RauptakeasaffectedbyapplicationofgypsumandphosphogypsumtoLouisianarice.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,68(1–2):165‐173.
Linquist,B.,K.J.vanGroenigen,M.A.Adviento‐Borbe,C.Pittelkow,etal.2011.Anagronomicassessmentofgreenhousegasemissionsfrommajorcerealcrops.GlobalChangeBiology:n/a‐n/a.
Linquist,B.A.,J.E.Hill,R.G.Mutters,C.A.Greer,etal.2009.AssessingtheNecessityofSurface‐AppliedPreplantNitrogenFertilizerinRiceSystems.AgronomyJournal,101(4):906‐915.
Linquist,B.A.,M.A.Adviento‐Borbe,C.M.Pittelkow,C.v.Kessel,etal.2012.Fertilizermanagementpracticesandgreenhousegasemissionsfromricesystems:Aquantitativereviewandanalysis.FieldCropsResearch,135:10‐21.
Linzmeier,W.,R.Gutser,andU.Schmidhalter.2001.NitrousOxideEmissionfromSoilandfromaNitrogen‐15‐LabelledFertilizerwiththeNewNitrificationInhibitor3,4‐DimethylpyrazolePhosphate(Dmpp).BiologyandFertilityofSoils,34(2):103‐108.
Liu,F.,X.BenWu,E.Bai,T.W.Boutton,etal.2010.SpatialscalingofecosystemCandNinasubtropicalsavannalandscape.GlobalChangeBiology,16(8):2213‐2223.
Liu,X.,A.Mosier,A.Halvorson,andF.Zhang.2006.TheImpactofNitrogenPlacementandTillageonNO,N2O,CH4;andCO2;FluxesfromaClayLoamSoil.PlantandSoil,280(1):177‐188.
Liu,X.J.,A.R.Mosier,A.D.Halvorson,andF.S.Zhang.2005.Tillageandnitrogenapplicationeffectsonnitrousandnitricoxideemissionsfromirrigatedcornfields.PlantandSoil,276:235‐249.
Livesley,S.,B.Dougherty,A.Smith,D.Navaud,etal.2010.Soil‐atmosphereexchangeofcarbondioxide,methaneandnitrousoxideinurbangardensystems:impactofirrigation,fertiliserandmulch.UrbanEcosystems,13(3):273‐293.
![Page 130: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/130.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-130
Lobell,D.B.,andC.Bonfils.2008.TheEffectofIrrigationonRegionalTemperatures:ASpatialandTemporalAnalysisofTrendsinCalifornia,1934–2002.JournalofClimate,21(10):2063‐2071.
Lopez‐Diaz,M.L.,V.Rolo,andG.Moreno.2011.Trees'RoleinNitrogenLeachingafterOrganic,MineralFertilization:AGreenhouseExperiment.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40(3):853‐859.
Luo,J.,C.A.M.deKlein,S.F.Ledgard,andS.Saggar.2010.Managementoptionstoreducenitrousoxideemissionsfromintensivelygrazedpastures:Areview.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,136(3‐4):282‐291.
Ma,B.L.,T.Y.Wu,N.Tremblay,W.Deen,etal.2010.Nitrousoxidefluxesfromcornfields:on‐farmassessmentoftheamountandtimingofnitrogenfertilizer.GlobalChangeBiology,16(1):156‐170.
Macadam,X.M.B.,A.Prado,P.Merino,J.M.Estavillo,etal.2003.Dicyandiamideand3,4‐DimethylPyrazolePhosphateDecreaseN2OEmissionsfromGrasslandbutDicyandiamideProducesDeleteriousEffectsinClover.Journalofplantphysiology,160(12):1517‐1523.
Magalhaes,A.M.T.,P.M.Chalk,andW.M.Strong.1984.EffectofNitrapyrinonNitrousOxideEmissionfromFallowSoilsFertilizedwithAnhydrousAmmonia.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,5(4):411‐421.
Maharjan,B.,R.T.Venterea,andC.Rosen.2013.FertilizerandIrrigationManagementEffectsonNitrousOxideEmissionsandNitrateLeaching.AgronomyJournal.
Maharjan,B.,andR.T.Venterea.Inreview.Nitritedynamicsexplainfertilizermanagementeffectsonnitrousoxideemissionsinmaize.SubmittedtoSoilBiologyandBiochemistry.
Mahmood,T.,R.Ali,J.Iqbal,andU.Robab.2008.Nitrousoxideemissionfromanirrigatedcottonfieldundersemiaridsubtropicalconditions.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,44(5):773‐781.
Majumdar,D.,S.Kumar,H.Pathak,M.C.Jain,etal.2000.ReducingNitrousOxideEmissionfromanIrrigatedRiceFieldofNorthIndiawithNitrificationInhibitors.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,81(3):163‐169.
Majumdar,D.,H.Pathak,S.Kumar,andM.C.Jain.2002.NitrousOxideEmissionfromaSandyLoamInceptisolunderIrrigatedWheatinIndiaasInfluencedbyDifferentNitrificationInhibitors.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,91(1):283‐293.
Majumdar,D.2003.Methaneandnitrousoxideemissionfromirrigatedricefields:Proposedmitigationstrategies.CurrentScience,84:1317‐1326.
Malghani,S.,G.Gleixner,andS.Trumbore.2013.Charsproducedbyslowpyrolysisandhydrothermalcarbonizationvaryincarbonsequestrationpotentialandgreenhousegasesemissions.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,62:137‐146.
Malhi,S.S.,andM.Nyborg.1985.Methodsofplacementforincreasingtheefficiencyofnitrogenfertilizersappliedinthefall.AgronomyJournal,77:27‐32.
Malhi,S.S.,R.Lemke,Z.H.Wang,andB.S.Chhabra.2006.Tillage,nitrogenandcropresidueeffectsoncropyield,nutrientuptake,soilquality,andgreenhousegasemissions.Soil&TillageResearch,90(1‐2):171‐183.
Malla,G.,A.Bhatia,H.Pathak,S.Prasad,etal.2005.MitigatingNitrousOxideandMethaneEmissionsfromSoilinRice‐WheatSystemoftheIndo‐GangeticPlainwithNitrificationandUreaseInhibitors.Chemosphere,58(2):141‐147.
Mamo,M.,G.L.Malzer,D.J.Mulla,D.R.Huggins,etal.2003.Spatialandtemporalvariationineconomicallyoptimumnitrogenrateforcorn.AgronomyJournal,95:958‐964.
Manley,J.T.,G.E.Schuman,J.D.Reeder,andR.H.Hart.1995.Rangelandsoilcarbonandnitrogenresponsestograzing.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,50(3):294‐298.
Mann,L.K.1986.Changesinsoilcarbonstorageaftercultivation.SoilScience,142(5):279‐288.Matson,P.A.,R.Naylor,andI.Ortiz‐Monasterio.1998.IntegrationofEnvironmental,Agronomic,
andEconomicAspectsofFertilizerManagement.Science,280(5360):112‐115.
![Page 131: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/131.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-131
McCarty,G.W.,andJ.C.Ritchie.2002.Impactofsoilmovementoncarbonsequestrationinagriculturalecosystems.EnvironmentalPollution,116(3):423‐430.
McClaran,M.P.,J.Moore‐Kucera,D.A.Martens,J.vanHaren,etal.2008.Soilcarbonandnitrogeninrelationtoshrubsizeanddeathinasemi‐aridgrassland.Geoderma,145(1‐2):60‐68.
McLain,J.E.T.,andD.A.Martens.2006.Moisturecontrolsontracegasfluxesinsemiaridripariansoils.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70:367‐377.
McLain,J.E.T.,D.A.Martens,andM.P.McClaran.2008.Soilcyclingoftracegasesinresponsetomesquitemanagementinasemiaridgrassland.JournalofAridEnvironments,72:1654‐1665.
McSwiney,C.P.,andG.P.Robertson.2005.NonlinearresponseofN2Ofluxtoincrementalfertilizeradditioninacontinuousmaize(ZeamaysL.)croppingsystem.GlobalChangeBiology,11(10):1712‐1719.
McTaggart,I.P.,H.Clayton,J.Parker,L.Swan,etal.1997.NitrousOxideEmissionsfromGrasslandandSpringBarley,FollowingNFertiliserApplicationwithandwithoutNitrificationInhibitors.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,25(3):261‐268.
Melson,S.L.,M.E.Harmon,J.S.Fried,andJ.B.Domingo.2011.Estimatesoflive‐treecarbonstoresinthePacificNorthwestaresensitivetomodelselection.CarbonBalanceandManagement,6(1).
Menendez,S.,P.Merino,M.Pinto,C.González‐Murua,etal.2006.3,4‐DimethylpyrazolPhosphateEffectonNitrousOxide,NitricOxide,Ammonia,andCarbonDioxideEmissionsfromGrasslands.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35(4):973‐981.
Merino,P.,J.M.Estavillo,L.A.Graciolli,M.Pinto,etal.2002.MitigationofN2OEmissionsfromGrasslandbyNitrificationInhibitorandActilithF2AppliedwithFertilizerandCattleSlurry.SoilUseandManagement,18(2):135‐141.
Merwin,M.L.,andL.R.Townsend.2007.Onlinetoolforestimatingcarbonstorageinagroforestrypractices.EditedbyA.OliverandS.Campeau,WhenTreesandCropsGetTogether:EconomicOpportunitiesandEnvironmentalBenefitsfromAgroforestry:Proc.10thNorthAmericanAgroforestryConf.QuebecCity,Canada,June10‐13,2007:UniversitéLaval,Québec,Canada.
Merwin,M.L.,M.Easter,L.R.Townsend,R.C.Vining,etal.2009.Estimatingcarbonstockchangeinagroforestryandfamilyforestrypractices.InAgroforestryComesofAge:PuttingScienceintoPractice:Proc.11thNorthAmericanAgroforestryConf,M.A.GoldandM.M.Hall(eds.).Columbia,MO,May31‐June3,2009.
Miehle,P.,S.J.Livesley,P.M.Feikema,C.Li,etal.2006.AssessingproductivityandcarbonsequestrationcapabilityofEucalyptusglobulusplantationsusingtheprocessmodelForest‐DNDC:Calibrationandvalidation.EcologicalModelling,192:83‐94.
Millar,N.,G.P.Robertson,P.R.Grace,R.J.Gehl,etal.2010.Nitrogenfertilizermanagementfornitrousoxide(N2O)mitigationinintensivecorn(Maize)production:anemissionsreductionprotocolforU.S.Midwestagriculture.MitigationandAdaptionStrategiesforGlobalChange,15(2):185‐204.
Mize,C.W.,J.R.Brandle,M.M.Schoeneberger,andG.Bentrup.2008.EcologicaldevelopmentandfunctionofshelterbeltsintemperateNorthAmerica.InTowardAgroforestryDesign‐AnEcologicalApproach.AdvancesinAgroforestryVol4,S.JoseandA.M.Gorden(eds.):Springer.
Morgan,J.A.,R.F.Follett,L.H.Allen,S.DelGrosso,etal.2010.CarbonsequestrationinagriculturallandsoftheUnitedStates.JournalofSoilandWaterConservation,65(1):6A‐13A.
Morris,D.R.,B.Glaz,andS.H.Daroub.2004.Organicsoiloxidationpotentialduetoperiodicfloodanddrainagedepthundersugarcane.SoilScience,169:600‐608.
Mosier,A.,D.Schimel,D.Valentine,K.Bronson,etal.1991.Methaneandnitrousoxidefluxesinnative,fertilizedandcultivatedgrasslands.Nature,350(6316):330‐332.
![Page 132: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/132.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-132
Mosier,A.,R.Wassmann,L.Verchot,J.King,etal.2004.Methaneandnitrogenoxidefluxesintropicalagriculturalsoils:sources,sinksandmechanisms.Environment,DevelopmentandSustainability,6(11‐49).
Mosier,A.R.,J.M.Duxbury,J.R.Freney,O.Heinemeyer,etal.1998.AssessingandMitigatingN2OEmissionsfromAgriculturalSoils.ClimaticChange,40(1):7‐38.
Mosier,A.R.,A.D.Halvorson,G.A.Peterson,G.P.Robertson,etal.2005.MeasurementofNetGlobalWarmingPotentialinThreeAgroecosystems.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,72(1):67‐76.
Mosier,A.R.,A.D.Halvorson,C.A.Reule,andX.J.Liu.2006.NetglobalwarmingpotentialandgreenhousegasintensityinirrigatedcroppingsystemsinnortheasternColorado.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,35(4):1584‐1598.
Munoz,F.,R.S.Mylavarapu,andC.M.Hutchinson.2005.Environmentallyresponsiblepotatoproductionsystems:Areview.JournalofPlantNutrition,28:1287‐1309.
Nair,P.K.R.,V.D.Nair,B.M.Kumar,andJ.M.Showalter,(eds.).2010.Carbonsequestrationinagroforestrysystems.EditedbyD.Sparks.Vol.108,AdvancesinAgronomy.SanDiego,CA:AcademicPress.
Nair,V.D.,P.K.R.Nair,R.S.Kalmbacher,andI.V.Ezenwa.2007.Reducingnutrientlossfromfarmsthroughsilvopastoralpracticesincoarse‐texturedsoilsofFlorida,USA.EcologicalEngineering,29(2):192‐199.
Nash,P.R.2010.Alternativetillageandnitrogenmanagementoptionstoincreasecropproductionandreducenitrousoxideemissionsfromclaypansoils:M.S.Thesis,UniversityofMissouri.
Neff,J.C.,N.N.Barger,W.T.Baisden,D.P.Fernandez,etal.2009.Soilcarbonstorageresponsestoexpandingpinyon‐juniperpopulationsinsouthernUtah.EcologicalApplications,19(6):1405‐1416.
Nelson,S.D.,andR.E.Terry.1996.TheEffectsofSoilPhysicalPropertiesandIrrigationMethodonDenitrification.SoilScience,161(4):242‐249.
Nguyen,B.T.,J.Lehmann,J.Kinyangi,R.Smernik,etal.2008.Long‐termblackcarbondynamicsincultivatedsoil.Biogeochemistry,89(3):295‐308.
Nui,X.,andS.W.Duiker.2006.CarbonsequestrationpotentialbyafforestationofmarginalagriculturallandinthemidwesternU.S..ForEcolManage,223:415‐427.
Oelbermann,M.,andR.P.Voroney.2011.AnevaluationoftheCenturymodeltopredictsoilorganiccarbonintropicalandtemperateagroforestrysystems.AgroforestrySystems,81:37‐45.
Ogle,S.M.,F.JayBreidt,M.D.Eve,andK.Paustian.2003.UncertaintyinestimatinglanduseandmanagementimpactsonsoilorganiccarbonstorageforUSagriculturallandsbetween1982and1997.GlobalChangeBiology,9(11):1521‐1542.
Ogle,S.M.,F.J.Breidt,andK.Paustian.2005.Agriculturalmanagementimpactsonsoilorganiccarbonstorageundermoistanddryclimaticconditionsoftemperateandtropicalregions.Biogeochemistry,72(1):87–121.
Ogle,S.M.,F.J.Breidt,M.Easter,S.Williams,etal.2007.Anempiricallybasedapproachforestimatinguncertaintyassociatedwithmodellingcarbonsequestrationinsoils.EcologicalModelling,205:453‐463.
Ogle,S.M.,F.J.Breidt,M.Easter,S.Williams,etal.2010.ScaleanduncertaintyinmodeledsoilorganiccarbonstockchangesforUScroplandsusingaprocess‐basedmodel.GlobalChangeBiology,16(2):810‐822.
Ogle,S.M.,A.Swan,andK.Paustian.2012.No‐tillmanagementimpactsoncropproductivity,carboninputandsoilcarbonsequestration.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,149:37‐49.
Oh,N.H.,andP.A.Raymond.2006.ContributionofagriculturallimingtoriverinebicarbonateexportandCO2sequestrationintheOhioRiverbasin.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,20(3):GB3012.
Olson,K.R.,J.M.Lang,andS.A.Ebelhar.2005.Soilorganiccarbonchangesafter12yearsofno‐tillageandtillageofGrantsburgsoilsinsouthernIllinois.Soil&TillageResearch,81(2):217‐225.
![Page 133: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/133.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-133
Olson,R.,M.Schoeneberger,andS.Aschmann.2000.Anecologicalfoundationfortemperateagroforestry.InNorthAmericanAgroforestry:AnIntegratedScienceandPractice,H.E.Garrett,W.J.RietveldandR.F.Fisher(eds.).Madison,WI:ASASpecialPublication.
Page,K.L.,D.E.Allen,R.C.Dalal,andW.Slattery.2009.ProcessesandmagnitudeofCO2,CH4,andN2OfluxesfromlimingofAustralianacidicsoils:areview.SoilResearch,47(8):747‐762.
Pan,G.,X.Xu,P.Smith,W.Pan,etal.2010.AnincreaseintopsoilSOCstockofChina'scroplandsbetween1985and2006revealedbysoilmonitoring.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,136(1‐2):133‐138.
Parkin,T.B.,andJ.L.Hatfield.2010a.InfluenceofnitrapyrinonN2Olossesfromsoilreceivingfall‐appliedanhydrousammonia.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,136(1‐2):81‐86.
Parkin,T.B.,andJ.L.Hatfield.2010b.InfluenceofNitrapyrinonN2OLossesfromSoilReceivingFall‐AppliedAnhydrousAmmonia.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,136(1):81‐86.
Parton,W.J.,D.S.Schimel,C.V.Cole,andD.S.Ojima.1987.AnalysisoffactorscontrollingsoilorganicmatterlevelsinGreatPlainsgrasslands.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,51:1173‐1179.
Parton,W.J.,J.M.O.Scurlock,D.S.Ojima,T.G.Gilmanov,etal.1993.Observationsandmodelingofbiomassandsoilorganicmatterdynamicsforgrasslandbiomesworldwide.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,7:785‐809.
Parton,W.J.,E.A.Holland,S.J.DelGrosso,M.D.Hartman,etal.2001.GeneralizedmodelforNOxandN2Oemissionsfromsoils.JournalofGeophysicalResearch,106(D15):17403‐17420.
Parton,W.J.,M.D.Hartman,D.S.Ojima,andD.S.Schimel1998.DAYCENT:ItsLandSurfaceSubmodel:DescriptionandTesting.GlobalandPlanetaryChange,19:35‐48.
Pathak,H.,A.Bhatia,S.Prasad,S.Singh,etal.2002.EmissionofNitrousOxidefromRice‐WheatSystemsofIndo‐GangeticPlainsofIndia.Environmentalmonitoringandassessment,77(2):163‐178.
Paul,E.A.,S.J.Morris,J.Six,K.Paustian,etal.2003.InterpretationofSoilCarbonandNitrogenDynamicsinAgriculturalandAfforestedSoils.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,67(5):1620‐1628.
Paustian,K.,O.Andrén,H.H.Janzen,R.Lal,etal.1997.AgriculturalsoilsasasinktomitigateCO2emissions.SoilUseandManagement,13:230‐244.
Paustian,K.,J.Six,E.T.Elliott,andH.W.Hunt.2000.ManagementoptionsforreducingCO2emissionsfromagriculturalsoils.Biogeochemistry,48(1):147‐163.
Peichl,M.,N.V.Thevathasan,A.M.Gordon,J.Huss,etal.2006.Carbonsequestrationpotentialsintemperatetree‐basedintercroppingsystems,southernOntario,Canada.AgroforestrySystems,66:243‐257.
Perry,C.H.,C.W.Woodall,andM.M.Schoeneberger.2005.InventoryingTreesinAgriculturalLandscapes:TowardsanAccountingofWorkingTrees.InMovingAgroforestryintheMainstream,K.N.BrooksandP.F.Folliott(eds.).St.Paul,MN:DepartmentofForestResources,UniversityofMinnesota,St.Paul.
Petersen,S.O.1999.NitrousOxideEmissionsfromManureandInorganicFertilizersAppliedtoSpringBarley.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,28(5):1610‐1618.
Phillips,R.L.,andO.Beeri.2008.Scaling‐upknowledgeofgrowing‐seasonnetecosystemexchangeforlong‐termassessmentofNorthDakotagrasslandsundertheConservationReserveProgram.GlobalChangeBiology,14(5):1008‐1017.
Phillips,R.L.,D.L.Tanaka,D.W.Archer,andJ.D.Hanson.2009.FertilizerApplicationTimingInfluencesGreenhouseGasFluxesOveraGrowingSeason.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,38(4):1569‐1579.
Pielke,R.A.,J.Adegoke,A.Beltran‐Przekurat,C.A.Hiemstra,etal.2007.Anoverviewofregionalland‐useandland‐coverimpactsonrainfall.TellusB,59(3):587‐601.
![Page 134: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/134.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-134
Pineiro,G.,E.Jobbagy,J.Baker,B.Murray,etal.2009.Set‐asidescanbebetterclimateinvestmentthancornethanol.EcologicalApplications,19(2):277‐282.
Pineiro,G.,J.Paruelo,M.Oesterheld,andE.Jobbagy.2010.PathwaysofGrazingEffectsonSoilOrganicCarbonandNitrogen.RangelandEcology&Management,63(1):109‐119.
Pinheiro,J.C.,andD.M.Bates.2000.Mixed‐effectsmodelsinSandS‐Plus.NewYork,NY:Springer.Pittelkow,C.M.,M.A.Adviento‐Borbe,J.E.Hill,J.Six,etal.2013.Yield‐scaledglobalwarming
potentialofannualnitrousoxideandmethaneemissionsfromcontinuouslyfloodedricesystemsinresponsetonitrogeninput.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,177:10‐20.
Plante,A.F.,R.T.Conant,C.E.Stewart,K.Paustian,etal.2006.Impactofsoiltextureonthedistributionofsoilorganicmatterinphysicalandchemicalfractions.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70:287‐296.
Polprasert,C.2007.OrganicWasteRecycling:TechnologyandManagement:IWAPublishing.Post,W.M.,andK.C.Kwon.2000.SoilCarbonSequestrationandLand‐UseChange:Processesand
Potential.GlobalChangeBiology,6:317‐327.Rafique,R.,D.Henessy,andG.Kiely.2011.Evaluatingmanagementeffectsonnitrousoxide
emissionsfromgrasslandsusingtheprocess‐basedDeNitrificationDeComposition(DNDC)model.Atmospheric,Environment,45:6029‐6039.
Rau,B.M.,R.Tausch,A.Reiner,D.W.Johnson,etal.2010.Influenceofprescribedfireonecosystembiomass,carbon,andnitrogeninapinyonjuniperwoodland.RangelandEcology&Management,63:197‐202.
Raymond,P.A.,N.‐H.Oh,R.E.Turner,andW.Broussard.2008.AnthropogenicallyenhancedfluxesofwaterandcarbonfromtheMississippiRiver.Nature,451(7177):449‐452.
Reeder,J.D.,G.E.Schuman,andR.A.Bowman.1998.SoilCandNchangesonConservationReserveProgramlandsintheCentralGreatPlains.Soil&TillageResearch,47(3‐4):339‐349.
Ribaudo,M.,J.Delgado,L.T.Hansen,M.J.Livingston,etal.2011.NitrogeninAgriculturalSystems:ImplicationsforConservationPolicy:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,EconomicResearchService.
Roberts,K.G.,B.A.Gloy,S.Joseph,N.R.Scott,etal.2010.Lifecycleassessmentofbiocharsystems:Estimatingtheenergetic,economic,andclimatechangepotential.EnvironmentalScienceandTechnology,44:827‐833.
Robertson,G.,S.K.Hamilton,W.Parton,andS.DelGrosso.2011.Thebiogeochemistryofbioenergylandscapes:Carbon,nitrogen,andwaterconsiderations.EcologicalApplications,(inpress).
Robertson,G.P.,E.A.Paul,andR.R.Harwood.2000.GreenhouseGasesinIntensiveAgriculture:ContributionsofIndividualGasestotheRadiativeForcingoftheAtmosphere.Science,289(5486):1922‐1925.
Robertson,G.P.,andP.M.Vitousek.2009.NitrogeninAgriculture:BalancingtheCostofanEssentialResource.AnnualReviewofEnvironmentandResources,34(1):97‐125.
Robertson,G.P.,T.W.Bruulsema,R.J.Gehl,D.Kanter,D.L.Mauzerall,C.A.Rotz,andC.O.Williams.2013.Nitrogen‐climateinteractionsinU.S.agriculture.Biogeochemistry,114:41‐70.
Rochette,P.2008.No‐tillonlyincreasesN2Oemissionsinpoorly‐aeratedsoils.Soil&TillageResearch,101(1‐2):97‐100.
Rojstaczer,S.,andS.J.Deverel.1995.LandsubsidenceindrainedhistosolsandhighlyorganicmineralsoilsoftheSacramento‐SanJoaquinDelta.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,59:1162‐1167.
Ryals,R.,M.Kaisser,M.S.Torn,A.A.Berhe,etal.2014.Impactsoforganicmatteramendmentsoncarbonandnitrogendynamicsingrasslandsoils.SoilBiology&Biochemistry,68:52‐61.
Ryskowski,L.,andA.Kedziora.2007.Modificationofwaterflowsandnitrogenfluxesbyshelterbelts.EcologicalEngineering,29:388‐400.
![Page 135: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/135.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-135
Sanz‐Cobena,A.,L.Sánchez‐Martín,L.García‐Torres,andA.Vallejo.2012.GaseousemissionsofN2OandNOandNO3‐leachingfromureaappliedwithureaseandnitrificationinhibitorstoamaize(Zeamays)crop.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,149:64‐73.
Sass,R.L.,F.M.Fisher,S.T.Lewis,M.J.Jund,etal.1994.Methaneemissionsfromricefields:Effectofsoilproperties.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,8:135‐140.
Sauer,T.J.,C.A.Cambardella,andJ.R.Brandle.2007.Soilcarbonandtreelitterdynamicsinaredcedar‐scotchpineshelterbeltAgroforestrySystems,71:163‐174.
Sauer,T.J.,S.R.Compston,C.P.West,G.Hernandez‐Ramirez,etal.2009.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromabermudagrasspasture:Interseededwinterryeandpoultrylitter.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,41(7):1417‐1424.
Sawyer,J.E.,E.D.Nafziger,G.W.Randall,L.G.Bundy,etal.2006.Conceptsandrationaleforregionalnitrogenrateguidelinesforcorn.Ames,Iowa.
Scharf,P.C.,N.R.Kitchen,K.A.Sudduth,J.G.Davis,etal.2005.Field‐scalevariabilityinoptimalnitrogenfertilizerrateforcorn.AgronomyJournal,97:452‐461.
Scheaffer,C.C.,D.L.Wyse,andN.J.Ehlke.2009.PalatabilityandNutritiveValueofNativeLegumes.NativePlantsJournal,10(3):224‐231.
Scheer,C.,P.Grace,D.Rowlings,S.Kimber,etal.2011.Effectofbiocharamendmentonthesoil‐atmosphereexchangeofgreenhousegasesfromanintensivesubtropicalpastureinnorthernNewSouthWales,Australia.InPlantandSoil.
Schlesinger,W.H.2000.Carbonsequestrationinsoils:Somecautionamidstoptimism.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,82:121‐127.
Schoeneberger,M.M.,G.Bentrup,andC.A.Francis.2001.Ecobelts:reconnectingagricultureandcommunities.InInteractionsbetweenAgroecosystemsandRuralHumanCommunities,C.Flora(ed.).BocaRaton,FL:CRCPress.
Schoeneberger,M.M.,G.Bentrup,D.Current,B.Wight,etal.2008.Buildingbiggerbetterbuffersforbioenergy.WaterResourcesImpact,10:22‐26.
Schuman,G.E.,J.D.Reeder,J.T.Manley,R.H.Hart,etal.1999.Impactofgrazingmanagementonthecarbonandnitrogenbalanceofamixed‐grassrangeland.EcologicalApplications,9(1):65‐71.
Sehy,U.,R.Ruser,andJ.C.Munch.2003.Nitrousoxidefluxesfrommaizefields:relationshiptoyield,site‐specificfertilization,andsoilconditions.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,99(1‐3):97‐111.
Sharrow,S.H.,andS.Ismail.2004.Carbonandnitrogenstorageinagroforests,treeplantations,andpasturesinwesternOregon,USA.AgroforestrySystems,60(2):123‐130.
Shcherbak,I.,N.Millar,andG.P.Robertson.inpress.Aglobalmeta‐analysisofthenonlinearresponseofsoilnitrousoxide(N2O)emissionstofertilizernitrogen.ProceedingsoftheNationalAcademyofSciencesoftheUnitedStatesofAmerica,inpress.
Sherrod,L.,G.A.Peterson,D.G.Westfall,andL.R.Ahuja.2003.Croppingintensityenhancessoilorganiccarbonandnitrogeninano‐tillagroecosystem.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,67:1533‐1543.
Sherrod,L.,G.A.Peterson,D.G.Westfall,andL.R.Ahuja.2005.SoilOrganicCarbonPoolsAfter12YearsinNo‐TillDrylandAgroecosystems.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,69(1600‐1608).
Shih,S.F.,B.Glaz,andR.E.J.Barnes.1998.Subsidenceoforganicsoilsintheevergladesagriculturalareaduringthepast19years.SoilandCropScienceSocietyofFloridaProceedings,57:20‐29.
Shoji,S.,J.Delgado,A.Mosier,andY.Miura.2001.UseofControlledReleaseFertilizersandNitrificationInhibitorstoIncreaseNitrogenUseEfficiencyandtoConserveAirandWaterQuality.CommunicationsinSoilScienceandPlantAnalysis,32(7‐8):1051‐1070.
Signor,D.,C.E.P.Cerri,andR.Conant.2013.N2OemissionsduetonitrogenfertilizerapplicationsintworegionsofsugarcanecultivationinBrazil.EnvironmentalResearchLetters,8(1):015013.
![Page 136: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/136.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-136
Singer,J.W.,A.J.Franzluebbers,andD.L.Karlen.2009.Grass‐basedFarmingSystems:SoilConservationandEnvironmentalQuality.Madison,WI:AmericanSocietyofAgronomy,CropScienceSocietyofAmerica,SoilSocietyofAmerica.
Six,J.,E.T.Elliott,andK.Paustian.2000.Soilmacroaggregateturnoverandmicroaggregateformation:amechanismforCsequestrationunderno‐tillageagriculture.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,32(14):2099‐2103.
Six,J.,S.M.Ogle,F.J.Breidt,R.T.Conant,etal.2004.Thepotentialtomitigateglobalwarmingwithno‐tillagemanagementisonlyrealizedwhenpractisedinthelongterm.GlobalChangeBiology,10(2):155–160.
Skjemstad,J.O.,D.C.Reicosky,A.R.Wilts,andJ.A.McGowan.2002.CharcoalcarboninU.S.agriculturalsoils.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,66:1249‐1255.
Smith,K.A.,K.E.Dobbie,B.C.Ball,L.R.Bakken,etal.2000.OxidationofatmosphericmethaneinNorthernEuropeansoils,comparisonwithotherecosystems,anduncertaintiesintheglobalterrestrialsink.GlobalChangeBiology,6(7):791‐803.
Smith,L.C.,C.A.M.D.Klein,andW.D.Catto.2008a.EffectofDicyandiamideAppliedinaGranularFormonNitrousOxideEmissionsfromaGrazedDairyPastureinSouthland,NewZealand.NewZealandJournalofAgriculturalResearch,51(4):387‐396.
Smith,P.,D.Martino,Z.Cai,D.Gwary,etal.2008b.Greenhousegasmitigationinagriculture.PhilosophicalTransactionsoftheRoyalSocietyB:BiologicalSciences,363(1492):789‐813.
Snyder,C.S.,andN.A.Slaton.2001.RiceproductionintheUnitedStates‐anoverview.BetterCrops,85(3):3‐7.
Snyder,C.S.,T.W.Bruulsema,T.L.Jensen,andP.E.Fixen.2009.Reviewofgreenhousegasemissionsfromcropproductionsystemsandfertilizermanagementeffects.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,133(3‐4):247‐266.
SoilSurveyStaff.2011.SoilSurveyGeographic(SSURGO)Database:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,NaturalResourcesConservationService.
Song,C.,andJ.Zhang.2009.Effectsofsoilmoisture,temperature,andnitrogenfertilizationonsoilrespirationandnitrousoxideemissionduringmaizegrowthperiodinnortheastChina.ActaAgriculturaeScandinavia,59:97‐106.
Sonon,L.,D.Kissel,andU.Saha.2012.Mineralizationofhigh‐Norganicfertilizers:ClemsonUniversity.
Spalding,R.F.,D.G.Watts,J.S.Schepers,M.E.Burbach,etal.2001.Controllingnitrateleachinginirrigatedagriculture.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,30:1184‐1194.
Spencer,S.,S.M.Ogle,F.J.Breidt,J.Goebel,etal.2011.Designinganationalsoilcarbonmonitoringnetworktosupportclimatechangepolicy:acaseexampleforUSagriculturallands.GreenhouseGasManagement&Measurement,1:167‐178.
Spokas,K.A.2010.Reviewofthestabilityofbiocharinsoils:predictabilityofO:Cmolarratios.CarbonManagement,1:289‐303.
Spokas,K.A.2013.Impactofbiocharfieldagingonlaboratorygreenhousegasproductionpotentials.GCBBioenergy,5:165‐176.
SRM.1998.Aglossaryoftermsusedinrangemanagement.Lakewood,CO:SocietyforRangeManagement.
Stallard,R.F.1998.Terrestrialsedimentationandthecarboncycle:couplingweatheringanderosiontocarbonburial.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,12:231‐257.
Stanford,G.1973.Rationaleforoptimumnitrogenfertilizationincornproduction.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,2:159‐166.
Stang,F.,K.Butterbach‐Bahl,andH.Papen.2000.Aprocess‐orientedmodelofN2OandNOemissionsfromforestsoils.2.Sensitivityanalysisandvalidation.J.Geophys.Res.,105:4385‐4398.
![Page 137: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/137.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-137
Stehfest,E.,andL.Bouwman.2006.N2OandNOemissionfromagriculturalfieldsandsoilsundernaturalvegetation:summarizingavailablemeasurementdataandmodelingofglobalannualemissions.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,74(3):207‐228.
Stephens,J.C.,L.H.AllenJr.,andE.Chen.1984.Organicsoilsubsidence.InReviewsinEngineeringGeology,vol.VI,T.L.Holzer(ed.).Boulder,CO:GeologicalSocietyofAmerica.
Steudler,P.A.,R.D.Bowden,J.M.Melillo,andJ.D.Aber.1989.Influenceofnitrogenfertilizationonmethaneuptakeintemperateforestsoils.Nature,341(6240):314‐316.
Stewart,C.E.,J.Zheng,J.Botte,andM.F.Cotrufo.2013.Co‐generatedfastpyrolysisbiocharmitigatesgreenhousegasemissionsandincreasescarobnsequestrationintemperatesoils.GCBBioenergy,5:153‐164.
Street,J.E.,andP.K.Bollich.2003.Riceprodcution.InRice:Origins,History,Technology,andProduction,C.W.SmithandR.H.Dilday(eds.).Hoboken,NJ:JohnWiley&Sons.
Sudmeyer,R.A.,andP.R.Scott.2002.CharacterisationofawindbreaksystemonthesouthcoastofWesternAustralia.AustralianJournalofExperimentalAgriculture,42:703‐727.
Suwanwaree,P.,andG.Robertson.2005.Methaneoxidationinforest,successional,andno‐tillagriculturalecosystems:Effectsofnitrogenandsoildisturbance.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,69:1722‐1729.
Svejcar,T.,R.Angell,J.A.Bradford,W.Dugas,etal.2008.CarbonfluxesonNorthAmericanrangelands.RangelandEcology&Management,61:465‐474.
Syswerda,S.P.,A.T.Corbin,D.L.Mokma,A.N.Kravchenko,etal.2011.Agriculturalmanagementandsoilcarbonstorageinsurfacevs.deeplayers.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,75:92‐101.
Teague,W.R.,S.L.Dowhower,S.A.Baker,R.J.Ansley,etal.2010.Soilandherbaceousplantresponsestosummerpatchburnsundercontinuousandrotationalgrazing.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,137:113‐123.
Thevathasan,N.V.,andA.M.Gordon.2004.EcologyoftreeintercroppingsystemsintheNorthtemperateregion:ExperiencesfromsouthernOntario,Canada.AgroforestrySystems,61‐62(1):257‐268.
Thornton,F.C.,B.R.Bock,andD.D.Tyler.1996.SoilEmissionsofNitricOxideandNitrousOxidefromInjectedAnhydrousAmmoniumandUrea.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,25(6):1378‐1384.
Tonitto,C.,M.B.David,andL.E.Drinkwater.2006.Replacingbarefallowswithcovercropsinfertilizer‐intensivecroppingsystems:Ameta‐analysisofcropyieldandNdynamics.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,112:58‐72.
Toombs,T.P.,J.D.Derner,D.J.Augustine,B.Krueger,etal.2010.Managingforbiodiversityandlivestock−Ascale‐dependentapproachforpromotingvegetationheterogeneityinwesternGreatPlainsgrasslands.Rangelands,32:10‐15.
Tunney,H.,L.Kirwan,W.Fu,N.Culleton,etal.2010.Long‐termphosphorusgrasslandexperimentforbeefproduction–impactsonsoilphosphoruslevelsandliveweightgains.SoilUseandManagement,26(3):237‐244.
U.S.EPA.2009.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2007.Washington,DC:U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
U.S.EPA.2010.InventoryofU.S.GreenhouseGasEmissionsandSinks:1990‐2008.Washington,DC:U.S.EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
U.S.EPA.2011.InventoryofU.S.greenhousegasemissionsandsinks:1990‐2009.Washington,D.C.:EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
U.S.EPA.2013.InventoryofU.S.greenhousegasemissionsandsinks:1990‐2011.Washington,D.C.:EnvironmentalProtectionAgency.
![Page 138: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/138.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-138
Udawatta,R.P.,R.J.Kremer,H.E.Garrett,andS.H.Anderson.2009.Soilenzymeactivitiesandphysicalpropertiesinawatershedmanagedunderagroforestryandrow‐cropsystems.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,131:98‐104.
USDA.1992.AgriculturalWasteCharacteristics.Chapter4.InAnimalWasteManagementFieldHandbook:NaturalResourcesConservationService,UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture.
USDA.2003.User’sGuide‐RevisedUniversalSoilLossEquationVersion2,RUSL2.WashingtonDC:UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,AgriculturalResearchService.
USDA.2004.TheWindErosionPredictionSystem‐WEPS1.0.UserManual.WashingtonDC:UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture,AgriculturalResearchService.
USDA.2009.SummaryReport:2007NationalResourcesInventory.Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,NaturalResourcesConservationService.
USDA.2011.U.S.AgricultureandForestGreenhouseGasInventory:1990‐2008.Washington,DC:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture.
USDA.2012.CarbonManagementTool:AgroforestrySamplingMethods.RetrievedJune11fromhttp://www.comet2.colostate.edu/agroforestry/samplingMethods.asp.
USDAARS.2013.NationalProgram212:ClimateChange,Soils,andEmissionsandNP214:Agricultural&IndustrialByproductsU.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,AgriculturalResearchService.http://www.ars.usda.gov/research/programs/programs.htm?np_code=212&docid=21223.
USDANRCS.2004.NationalForestryHandbook,Title190:U.S.DepartmentofAgriculture,NaturalResourcesConservationService.ftp://ftp‐fc.sc.egov.usda.gov/NSSC/National_Forestry_Handbook/nfh_2004.pdf.
USDANRCS.2008.SoilTillageIntensityRating(STIR).Pennsylvania.http://www.pa.nrcs.usda.gov/technical/Fact_Sheets/STIR_May08.pdf.
USDANRCS.2012.NationalConservationPracticeStandards.UnitedStatesDepartmentofAgriculture.RetrievedJune11fromhttp://www.nrcs.usda.gov/wps/portal/nrcs/main/national/technical/alphabetical/ncps.
Vallejo,A.,L.Garcia‐Torres,J.A.Diez,A.Arce,etal.2005.ComparisonofNlosses(NO3‐,N2O,NO)fromsurfaceapplied,injectedoramended(DCD)pigslurryofanirrigatedsoilinaMediterraneanclimate.PlantandSoil,272:313‐325.
Vallejo,A.,U.M.Skiba,L.Garcia‐Torres,A.Arce,etal.2006.Nitrogenoxidesemissionfromsoilsbearingapotatocropasinfluencedbyfertilizationwithtreatedpigslurriesandcomposts.SoilBiologyandBiochemistry,38:2782‐2793.
vanGroenigen,J.W.,G.J.Kasper,G.L.Velthof,A.vandenPol‐vanDasselar,etal.2004.Nitrousoxideemissionsfromsilagemaizefieldsunderdifferentmineralnitrogenfertilizerandslurryapplications.PlantandSoil,263.
VanGroenigen,J.W.,G.L.Velthof,O.Oenema,K.J.VanGroenigen,etal.2010.TowardsanagronomicassessmentofN2Oemissions:acasestudyforarablecrops.EuropeanJournalofSoilScience,61(6):903‐913.
vanKessel,C.,R.Venterea,J.Six,M.A.Adviento‐Borbe,etal.2012.Climate,duration,andNplacementdetermineN2Oemissionsinreducedtillagesystems:ameta‐analysis.GlobalChangeBiology,19(1):33‐44.
VanOost,K.,T.A.Quine,G.Govers,S.DeGryze,etal.2007.TheImpactofAgriculturalSoilErosionontheGlobalCarbonCycle.Science,318(5850):626‐629.
Velthof,G.L.,O.Oenema,R.Postma,andM.L.VanBeusichem.1997.Effectsoftypeandamountofappliednitrogenfertilizeronnitrousoxidefluxesfromintensivelymanagedgrassland.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,46:257‐267.
Venterea,R.,andA.J.Stanenas.2008.Profileanalysisandmodelingofreducedtillageeffectsonsoilnitrousoxideflux.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,37:1360‐1367.
![Page 139: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/139.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-139
Venterea,R.T.,M.Burger,andK.A.Spokas.2005.NitrogenOxideandMethaneEmissionsunderVaryingTillageandFertilizerManagement.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,34(5):1467‐1477.
Venterea,R.T.,J.M.Baker,M.S.Dolan,andK.A.Spokas.2006.CarbonandNitrogenStorageareGreaterunderBiennialTillageinaMinnesotaCorn–SoybeanRotation.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70(5):1752‐1762.
Venterea,R.T.2007.Nitrite‐drivennitrousoxideproductionunderaerobicsoilconditions:kineticsandbiochemicalcontrols.GlobalChangeBiology,13(8):1798‐1809.
Venterea,R.T.,M.Bijesh,andM.S.Dolan.2011a.FertilizerSourceandTillageEffectsonYield‐ScaledNitrousOxideEmissionsinaCornCroppingSystem.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,40(5):1521‐1531.
Venterea,R.T.,B.Maharjan,andM.S.Dolan.2011b.Fertilizersourceandtillageeffectsonyield‐scaledN2Oemissionsinacorncroppingsystem.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality.
Verchot,L.,T.Krug,R.D.Lasco,S.Ogle,etal.2006.Chapter5:Grassland.In2006IPCCGuidelinesforNationalGreenhouseGasInventories,S.Eggleston,L.Buendia,K.Miwa,T.NgaraandD.L.Tanaka(eds.).Japan:IGES.
Verchot,L.,M.VanNoordwijk,S.Kandji,T.Tomich,etal.2007.Climatechange:linkingadaptationandmitigationthroughagroforestry.MitigationandAdaptationStrategiesforGlobalChange,12(5):901‐918.
Vermeire,L.T.,A.C.Ganguli,andR.L.Gillen.2002.Arobustmodelforestimatingstandingcropacrossvegetationtypes.JournalofRangeManagement,55:494‐497.
Wang,Y.T.,H.D.Gabbard,andP.C.Pai.1991.Inhibitionofacetatemethanogenesisbyphenols.JournalofEnvironmentalEngineeringASCE,117:487‐500.
Wassmann,R.,andM.S.Aulakh.2000.Theroleofriceplantsinregulatingmechanismsofmethanemissions.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,31(1):20‐29.
Wassmann,R.,R.S.Lantin,H.U.Neue,L.V.Buendia,etal.2000.CharacterizationofMethaneEmissionsfromRiceFieldsinAsia.III.MitigationOptionsandFutureResearchNeeds.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,58(1):23‐36.
Wassmann,R.,andH.Pathak.2007.Introducinggreenhousegasmitigationasadevelopmentobjectiveinrice‐basedagriculture:II.Cost–benefitassessmentfordifferenttechnologies,regionsandscales.AgriculturalSystems,94(3):826‐840.
Weir,W.W.1950.SubsidenceofpeatlandsoftheSacramento‐SanJoaquinDelta,California.Weiske,A.,G.Benckiser,andJ.C.G.Ottow.2001.EffectoftheNewNitrificationInhibitorDMPPin
ComparisontoDCDonNitrousOxide(N2O)EmissionsandMethane(CH4)OxidationDuring3YearsofRepeatedApplicationsinFieldExperiments.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,60(1):57‐64.
West,T.,andJ.Six.2007.Consideringtheinfluenceofsequestrationdurationandcarbonsaturationonestimatesofsoilcarboncapacity.ClimaticChange,80(1):25‐41.
West,T.O.,andG.Marland.2002.Asynthesisofcarbonsequestration,carbonemissions,andnetcarbonfluxinagriculture:comparingtillagepracticesintheUnitedStates.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,91(1–3):217‐232.
West,T.O.,G.Marland,A.W.King,W.M.Post,etal.2004.Carbonmanagementresponsecurves:estimatesoftemporalsoilcarbondynamics.EnvironmentalManagement,33:507‐518.
West,T.O.,andA.C.McBride.2005.ThecontributionofagriculturallimetocarbondioxideemissionsintheUnitedStates:dissolution,transport,andnetemissions.Agriculture,Ecosystems&Environment,108(2):145‐154.
West,T.O.,C.C.Brandt,L.M.Baskaran,C.M.Hellwinckel,etal.2010.CroplandcarbonfluxesintheUnitedStates:increasinggeospatialresolutionofinventory‐basedcarbonaccounting.EcologicalApplications,20:1074‐1086.
![Page 140: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/140.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-140
West,T.O.,V.Bandaru,C.C.Brandt,A.E.Schuh,etal.2011.RegionaluptakeandreleaseofcropCintheUnitedStates.Biogeosciences,8:2037‐2046.
Wilhelm,W.W.,J.M.F.Johnson,D.L.Karlen,andD.T.Lightle.2007.Cornstovertosustainsoilorganiccarbonfurtherconstrainsbiomasssupply.AgronomyJournal,99:1665‐1667.
Wolf,B.,X.Zheng,N.Bruggemann,W.Chen,etal.2010.Grazing‐inducedreductionofnaturalnitrousoxidereleasefromcontinentalsteppe.Nature,464(7290):881‐884.
Woolf,D.,andJ.Lehmann.2012.Modellingthelong‐termresponsetopositiveandnegativeprimingofsoilorganiccarbonbyblackcarbon.Biogeochemistry,111:83‐95.
Wu,J.2011.CarbonaccumulationinpaddyecosystemsinsubtropicalChina:evidencefromlandscapestudies.EuropeanJournalofSoilScience,62(1):29‐34.
Wulf,S.,M.Maeting,andJ.Clemens.2002.ApplicationTechniqueandSlurryCo‐FermentationEffectsonAmmonia,NitrousOxide,andMethaneEmissionsafterSpreading.JournalofEnvironmentalQuality,31(6):1795‐1801.
Xu,J.Z.,S.Z.Peng,H.J.Hou,S.H.Yang,etal.2012.Gaseouslossesofnitrogenbyammoniavolatilizationandnitrousoxideemissionsfromricepaddieswithdifferentirrigationmanagement.IrrigationScience,August.
Yadvinder‐Singh,Y.‐S.,S.S.Malhi,M.Nyborg,andE.G.Beauchamp.1994.Largegranules,nestsorbands:Methodsofincreasingefficiencyoffall‐appliedureaforsmallcerealgrainsinNorthAmerica.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,38(1):61‐87.
Yagi,K.,H.Tsuruta,andK.Minami.1997.Possibleoptionsformitigatingmethaneemissionfromricecultivation.NutrientCyclinginAgroecosystems,49(1‐3):213‐220.
Yan,X.,K.Yagi,H.Akiyama,andH.Akimoto.2005.Statisticalanalysisofthemajorvariablescontrollingmethaneemissionfromricefields.GlobalChangeBiology,11(7):1131‐1141.
Yan,X.Y.,Y.Hosen,andK.Yagi.2001.NitrousoxideandnitricoxideemissionsfrommaizefieldplotsasaffectedbyNfertilizertypeandapplicationmethod.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,34:297‐303.
Yates,T.T.,B.C.Si,R.E.Farrell,andD.J.Pennock.2006.Probabilitydistributionandspatialdependenceofnitrousoxideemission:temporalchangeinhummockyterrain.SoilScienceSocietyofAmericaJournal,70:753‐762.
Yu,L.,J.Tang,R.Zhang,Q.Wu,etal.2013.Effectsofbiocharapplicationonsoilmethaneemissionatdifferentsoilmoisturelevels.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,49:119‐128.
Zaman,M.,M.L.Nguyen,J.D.Blennerhassett,andB.F.Quin.2008.ReducingNH3,N2Oand‐NLossesfromaPastureSoilwithUreaseorNitrificationInhibitorsandElementalS‐AmendedNitrogenousFertilizers.BiologyandFertilityofSoils,44(5):693‐705.
Zebarth,B.J.,P.Rochette,andD.L.Burton.2008a.N2Oemissionsfromspringbarleyproductionasinfluencedbyfertilizernitrogenrate.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:197‐205.
Zebarth,B.J.,P.Rochette,D.L.Burton,andM.Price.2008b.EffectoffertilizernitrogenmanagementonN2Oemissionsincommercialcornfields.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,88:189‐195.
Zebarth,B.J.,E.Snowdon,D.L.Burton,C.Goyer,etal.2012.Controlledreleasefertilizerproducteffectsonpotatocropresponseandnitrousoxideemissionsunderrain‐fedproductiononamedium‐texturedsoil.CanadianJournalofSoilScience,92:759‐769.
Zhang,J.,andX.Han.2008.N2Oemissionfromthesemi‐aridecosystemundermineralfertilizer(ureaandsuperphosphate)andincreasedprecipitationinnorthernChina.AtmosphericEnvironment,42:291‐302.
Zhang,Y.,C.Li,C.C.Trettin,andG.Sun.2002.Anintegratedmodelofsoil,hydrologyandvegetationforcarbondynamicsinwetlandecosystems.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,16:1‐17.
Zhang,Y.,Y.Y.Wang,S.L.Su,andC.S.Li.2011.QuantifyingmethaneemissionsfromricepaddiesinNortheeastChinabyintegratingremotesensingwithbiogeochemicalmode.Biogeosciences,8:1225‐1235.
![Page 141: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/141.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-141
Zhou,X.,J.R.Brandle,T.Awada,M.M.Schoeneberger,etal.2011.Theuseofforest‐derivedspecificgravityfortheconversionofvolumetobiomassforopen‐growntreesonagriculturalland.BiomassBioenergy,35(5):1721‐1731.
Zhou,X.,M.M.Schoeneberger,J.R.Brandle,T.N.Awada,etal.inreview.Analyzingtheuncertaintiesinuseofforest‐derivedbiomassequationsforopen‐growntreesinagriculturalland.ForestScience.
Zhou,X.H.1999.Onthethree‐dimensionalaerodynamicstructureofshelterbelts.PhDThesis,UniversityofNebraska,Lincoln,NE.
Zou,J.,Y.Huang,J.Jiang,X.Zheng,etal.2005.A3‐yearfieldmeasurementofmethaneandnitrousoxideemissionsfromricepaddiesinChina:Effectsofwaterregime,cropresidue,andfertilizerapplication.GlobalBiogeochemicalCycles,19:doi:10.1029/2004GB002401.
![Page 142: Chapter 3 Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in ...Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems 3-3 Acronyms, Chemical Formulae,](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022041015/5ec6f27027b57d17d40ff988/html5/thumbnails/142.jpg)
Chapter 3: Quantifying Greenhouse Gas Sources and Sinks in Cropland and Grazing Land Systems
3-142
Thispageisintentionallyleftblank.