chapter 7shodhganga.inflibnet.ac.in/bitstream/10603/73527/17... · 40 maharashtra chemical products...
TRANSCRIPT
221
Chapter – 7
Findings And Testing Of Hypothesis
Findings
The findings of the study were broadly classified into specific findings and General
findings.
The specific findings were derived from Qualitative and Quantitative analysis.
7.1 Specific findings(Qualitative Analysis):
Specific findings with reference to analysis of the:
SME unites from engineering, chemical, others, pharmaceuticals and textile sectors in
Navi Mumbai.
Specific Findings with reference to SME development in Navi Mumbai
Employment Generation in SME at TBIB in Navi-Mumbai.
Perception of SME-Land acquisition and allotment
Perception of SME-Infrastructure Development
Perception of SME –Fire safety measures
Perception of SME-Safety and Security
Perception of SME-Consultancy
Perception of SME-Incentives etc.
Findings of MIDC services and facilities (Qualitative)
Employment Generation in SME at TBIB in Navi-Mumbai.
Small and Medium Enterprise (SME) at Thane Belapur Industrial Belt at Navi
Mumbai has shown growing trends in employment generation from the year2000 to
2013.During the study 100 SME has analyzed and favorable feedback has collected
from them regarding employment in their enterprises. For calculating percentage
figure for the year 2000 was taken at base level and calculated the figures for the year
2013.The Following table is showing the responses for the employment generation in
respective SME in terms of numbers and percentage.
222
Table No.7.1
Employment Generation in SME at Thane Belapur Industrial Belt(TBIB) in
Navi Mumbai.
Sr.
No Name of the Company Category
Employment
s in the Year
2000
Employments
in Year the
2013
Num. % Num. %
01 I.I.D. Cast Pvt. Ltd Engineering 15 100 35 233.33
02 Mahavir Pvt. Ltd Engineering 02 100 05 250
03 Sevilax Fabrication Pvt. Ltd Engineering 1 100 14 127.27
04 Eastwest Pvt. Ltd Engineering 12 100 25 208.3
05 Veer Singh Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 08 266.66
06 Swastik Steels Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 07 233.33
07 Anamed Pvt. Ltd Engineering 05 100 11 220
08 Dunnimaa Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 54 216
09 Yeoman Marine Pvt. Ltd Engineering 06 100 200 3333.3
3
10 Union Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 26 260
11 Matharu Sons Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 20 200
12 Saini Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 18 180
13 Apollo Soyuz Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 40 160
14 Guru Meatal Pvt. Ltd Engineering 07 100 12 171.42
15 Abak Electrofab Pvt. Ltd Engineering 09 100 15 166.66
16 Cliffkumar Pvt. Ltd Engineering 30 100 73 243.33
17 Nilsan Nishotech Pvt. Ltd Engineering 21 100 12 171.42
18 Unitech Corporation Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 07 100 10 142.85
19 Bombay Metals Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 33 330
20 S.A.Mechanical Pvt. Ltd Engineering 03 100 09 300
21 Meco Instruments Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 43 172
22 Indyeit Shopping Indis Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 20 100 40 200
23 E.P.L. Electrical Pvt. Ltd Engineering 14 100 27 192.85
223
24 Radixelectro System Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 15 100 45 300
25 Elumate India Pvt. Ltd Engineering 04 100 09 225
26 Shubham Electrtech Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 10 100 40 400
27 Apex Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering 300 100 10 333.33
28 Micron Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering 15 100 55 366.66
29 Statmoat Special Machines
Pvt. Ltd
Engineering 40 100 110 275
30 Micon Walves Pvt.Ltd. Engineering 15 100 35 233.33
31 Promas Engineering Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 12 100 30 250
32 Golden Engineering Pvt.
Ltd
Engineering 06 100 18 300
33 Eata Plast Fabrics Pvt. Ltd Engineering 25 100 43 172
34 Anupteach Pvt. Ltd Engineering 06 100 18 300
35 Motif Indiana Pvt. Ltd Engineering 53 100 81 152.83
36 Incrab Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering 10 100 20 200
37 Shree Ganesh Ent. Pvt.Ltd. Engineering 05 100 09 180
38 Zydus Takeda Pvt. Ltd Engineering 35 100 65 185.71
39 Accura Pvt. Ltd Engineering 09 100 17 188.88
40 Maharashtra Chemical
Products Pvt. Ltd
Chemical 06 100 11 183.33
41 Protochem Industries
Pvt.Ltd
Chemical 10 100 26 260
42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 12 100 25 208.33
43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 20 250
44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 06 200
45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 04 100 08 200
46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 48 192
47 Chembond Ashlasd Water
Technologies Pvt. Ltd
Chemical 110 100 215 195.45
224
48 Bombay Ammonia &
Chemical Company Pvt ltd
Chemical 30 100 60 200
49 BASF Chemical Company
Pvt. Ltd
Chemical 13 100 23 176.92
41 Protochem Industries
Pvt.Ltd
Chemical 10 100 26 260
42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 12 100 25 208.33
43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 20 250
44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 06 200
45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 04 100 08 200
46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 48 192
47 Chembond Ashlasd Water
Technologies Pvt. Ltd
Chemical 110 100 215 195.45
48 Bombay Ammonia
&Chemical Company Pvt
ltd
Chemical 30 100 60 200
49 BASF Chemical Company
Pvt. Ltd
Chemical 13 100 23 176.92
50 Borregaard South Asia Pvt.
Ltd
Chemical 10 100 25 250
51 Malade Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 08 100 16 200
52 Saif Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 03 100 05 166.66
53 Prasol Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 55 100 200 363.63
54 G. B. Galvanizer Pvt. Ltd Chemical 32 100 56 175
55 Siddhivinayak Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 60 240
56 NGI Fine-Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 25 100 70 280
57 Quality Chemicals
Industries Pvt.Ltd
Chemical 27 100 35 129.62
58 Mode pro India Pvt. Ltd Chemical 37 100 77 208.10
59 Onsar chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical 40 100 60 150
60 Shirdi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical 30 100 100 333.33
61 Chemtron Science Chemical 35 100 155 442.85
225
Laboratories Pvt. Ltd
62 Savai Ties Printers Pvt. Ltd. Furniture
(Others)
40 100 50 125
63 Jay Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. Printing Roller
(Others)
09 100 30 333.33
64 Gazell Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Promotion
(Others)
12 100 25 208.33
65 DNX Cargo India Pvt. Ltd. Cargo Service
(Others)
04 100 10 250
66 Welcome Teach Pvt. Ltd. I.T. (Others) 33 100 115 348.48
67 VRL Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Transport
(Others)
02 100 10 500
68 Shree Bhavani Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) 06 100 08 133.33
69 Imagico India Pvt. Ltd. Paints (Others) 30 100 60 200
70 Dolphin Offshore
Enterprises India Pvt. Ltd.
Oil Fabrication
(Others)
09 100 20 222.22
71 M.M.Poonijaji Speices Spicess (Others) 20 100 35 175
72 Colorband Dystuff Pvt. Ltd. Dystuff
(Others)
10 100 30 300
73 Fabricolour Pvt. Ltd. Fabrication
(Others)
03 100 07 233.33
74 Paper Pack Industries Pvt.
Ltd.
Paper (Others) 08 100 12 150
75 Maharaja Ice Factory Pvt.
Ltd.
Ice Sheet
(Others)
03 100 17 566.66
76 Sunrise Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Packaging
(Others)
10 100 23 230
77 Sri Chakara Prints Printing
(Others)
10 100 30 300
78 Seagull Mineral Water Pvt.
Ltd.
Mineral Water
(Others)
06 100 12 200
226
79 K.G. Marketing Marketing
(Others)
02 100 04 200
80 BNP Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Furniture
(Others)
06 100 24 400
81 M/S D.G.Gore Pvt. Ltd. Fragrance
(Others)
02 100 08 400
82 Berger Paints India Pvt. Ltd. Paint (Others) 15 100 60 400
83 Tyresoles Pvt. Ltd. Rubber (Others) 10 100 40 266.66
84 Apurva Pvt. Ltd. Drinking Water
(Others)
6 100 15 250
85 Neelam printers & Capers
Pvt. Ltd.
Printing
(Others)
03 100 06 200
86 Sarelock Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) 45 100 250 5555.5
5
87 Ravi Printers Pvt. Ltd. Printing
(Others)
08 100 15 187.5
88 Delux Industries Service
Pvt. Ltd.
Spare Parts
(Others)
03 100 07 233.33
89 A.S.Controls Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts
(Others)
20 100 60 300
90 Tit-Bit Foods India Pvt. Ltd. Food (Others) 50 100 100 200
91 A.N.Fabricator Packaging
Water
(Others)
03 100 15 500
92 Pulraj Electronics Electronic
Component
(Others)
20 100 45 225
93 Entel Foods Food( Others) 60 100 160 266.66
94 I.G.C. Abrasives Pvt. Ltd. Textile 10 100 35 350
95 Thackers Velvet India Pvt.
Ltd.
Textile 05 100 10 200
96 Madhuram Apparels Pvt. Textile 15 100 42 280
227
Ltd.
97 Ameya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Textile 05 100 11 220
98 Spykar Lifestyle Pvt.Ltd. Textile 20 100 70 350
99 Sanofi Pasters India Pvt.
Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals 24 100 67 279.16
100 Anazeal Analyticals &
Research Pvt.Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals 20 100 60 200
(Source – Personal Survey)
Classification as per Category and Type of enterprise:
Selected sample units are classified according to category of enterprises and type of
enterprises. Units are categorized into Engineering, Chemical, Textile,
Pharmaceutical, Others (Plastic, Spare Parts, Rubber, Mineral Water, Fabrication,
I.T., Printing, Transporting, Paints, Packaging, and Paper).
Units are classified into Small enterprises and Medium enterprises as per their level of
investment. unites having investment from Rupees 25 lakh to 5 crores are considered
as Small enterprises and units having investment from rupees 5 crores one rupee to 10
crores are called as Medium enterprises.
Following table showing the details of the classification as per the category and type
of enterprises.
Table No.7.2
Classification of Engineering Enterprises as per the category
and type of enterprises.
Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of SME
01 I.I.D. Cast Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
02 Mahavir Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
03 Sevilax Fabrication Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
04 Eastwest Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
228
05 Veer Singh Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
06 Swastik Steels Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
07 Anamed Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
08 Dunnimaa Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
09 Yeoman Marine Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
10 Union Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
11 Matharu Sons Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
12 Saini Enginerring Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
13 Apollo Soyuz Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
14 Guru Metal Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
15 Abak Electrofab Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
16 Cliffkumar Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
17 Nilsan Nishotech Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
18 Unitech Corporation Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
19 Bombay Metals Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
20 S.A.Mechanical Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
21 Meco Instruments Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
22 Indyeit Shopping Indis Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
23 E.P.L. Electrical Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
24 Radixelectro System Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
25 Elumate India Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
26 Shubham Electrtech Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
27 Apex Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
28 Micron Industries Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
29 Statmoat Special Machines Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
30 Micon Walves Pvt.Ltd. Engineering Small
31 Promas Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Medium
32 Golden Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
33 Eata Plast Fabrics Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
34 Anupteach Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
35 Motif Indiana Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
36 Incrab Engineering Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
229
37 Shree Ganesh Ent. Pvt.Ltd. Engineering Small
38 Zydus Takeda Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
39 Accura Pvt. Ltd Engineering Small
Table No.7.3
Classification of Chemical Enterprises as per the Category and Type of
Enterprises
Sr.No. Type of Company Category Type of
SME
40 Maharashtra Chemical Products Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
41 Protochem Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical Small
42 Mosil Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
43 Apna Organics Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
44 Mayor Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
45 Bhakti Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
46 Indoco Medies Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
47 Chembond Ashlasd Water Technologies Pvt.
Ltd
Chemical Medium
48 Bombay Ammonia &Chemical Company Pvt
ltd
Chemical Small
49 BASF Chemical Company Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
50 Borregaard South Asia Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
51 Malade Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
52 Saif Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
53 Prasol Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
54 G. B. Galvanizer Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
55 Siddhivinayak Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
56 NGI Fine-Chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
57 Quality Chemic Industries Pvt.Ltd Chemical Small
58 Mode pro India Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
230
59 Onsar chemical Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
60 Shirdi Chemicals Pvt. Ltd Chemical Medium
61 Chemtron Science Laboratories Pvt. Ltd Chemical Small
231
Table No.7.4
Classification of Others enterprises as per the Category and Type of Enterprises
Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of
SME
62 Savai Ties Printers Pvt. Ltd. Furniture (Others) Small
63 Jay Elastomers Pvt. Ltd. Printing Roller
(Others)
Small
64 Gazell Promotion Pvt. Ltd. Promotion (Others) Small
65 DNX Cargo India Pvt. Ltd. Cargo Service
(Others)
Small
66 Welcome Teach Pvt. Ltd. I.T. (Others) Small
67 VRL Logistics Pvt. Ltd. Transport (Others) Small
68 Shree Bhavani Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) Small
69 Imagico India Pvt. Ltd. Paints (Others) Medium
70 Dolphin Offshore Enterprises India
Pvt. Ltd.
Oil Fabrication
(Others)
Small
71 M.M.Poonijaji Speices Spicess (Others) Small
72 Colorband Dystuff Pvt. Ltd. Dystuff (Others) Small
73 Fabricolour Pvt. Ltd. Fabrication
(Others)
Small
74 Paper Pack Industries Pvt. Ltd. Paper (Others) Small
75 Maharaja Ice Factory Pvt. Ltd. Ice Sheet (Others) Small
76 Sunrise Packaging Pvt. Ltd. Packaging (Others) Small
77 Sri Chakara Prints Printing (Others) Small
78 Seagull Mineral Water Pvt. Ltd. Mineral Water
(Others)
Small
79 K.G. Marketing Marketing (Others) Small
80 BNP Interiors Pvt. Ltd. Furniture (Others) Small
81 M/S D.G.Gore Pvt. Ltd. Fragrance (Others) Small
82 Berger Paints India Pvt. Ltd. Paint (Others) Medium
83 Tyresoles Pvt. Ltd. Rubber (Others) Small
84 Apurva Pvt. Ltd. Drinking Water
(Others)
Small
232
85 Neelam printers & Capers Pvt. Ltd. Printing (Others) Small
86 Sarelock Plastic Pvt. Ltd. Plastic (Others) Medium
87 Ravi Printers Pvt. Ltd. Printing (Others) Small
88 Delux Industries Service Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts (Others) Small
89 A.S.Controls Pvt. Ltd. Spare Parts (Others) Small
90 Tit-Bit Foods India Pvt. Ltd. Food (Others) Small
91 A.N.Fabricator Packaging Water
(Others)
Small
92 Pulraj Electronics Electronic
Component
(Others)
Small
93 Entel Foods Food( Others) Medium
Table No.7.6
Classification of Textile Enterprises as per the Category and Type of
Enterprises.
Sr.No. Name of the Company Category Type of SME
94 I.G.C. Abrasives Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small
95 Thackers Velvet India Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small
96 Madhuram Apparels Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small
97 Ameya Enterprises Pvt. Ltd. Textile Small
98 Spykar Lifestyle Pvt.Ltd. Textile Medium
233
Table No. 7.5
Classification of Pharmaceutical as per the Category and Type of Enterprises
Sr.No Name of the Company Category Type of SME
99 Sanofi Pasters India Pvt. Ltd. Pharmaceuticals Small
100 Anazeal Analyticals & Research
Pvt.Ltd.
Pharmaceuticals Medium
234
Perception of Respondents- Land Acquisition and Allotment
(Awareness,subsidy,cost,process,employment to land affected people,licensing
procedure)
Table No 7.7
Perception of SME Respondents-Land acquisition and allotment
Sr.
No
Land acquisition and allotment facility Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable(
%)
1 Awareness about land acquisition and allotment
policy of MIDC
89 11
2 Land acquired at subsidies‟ rate 85 15
3 Cost of land in MIDC area as compared to other
areas
91 09
4 Process of acquiring land 94 06
5 Employment for land affected people 06 94
6 Procedure for licensing and permission for
acquiring land
97 03
Note: The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to land acquisition
and allotment facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in
Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the
Awareness about land acquisition and allotment policy of MIDC is Favorable to
a very large extent.
2) ) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the Land
acquired at subsidies rate is Favorable to a very large extent
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the Cost
of land in MIDC area as compared to other areas is Favorable to a very large
extent
235
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the
Process of acquiring land is Favorable to a very large extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the
Employment for land affected people is non-favorable to a large extent
6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards the
Procedure for licensing and permission for acquiring land is favorable to a very
large extent
B) Perception of Respondents- Infrastructure facilities (concession,
upgradation, technical surveys, energy audit, loss, availability of power,
enough water, frequency of water, subsidy loss due to shortage of water,
water subsidy, assistance for damage pipe)
Table No 7.8
Perception of SME Respondents-Infrastructure facilities
Sr.No Infrastructure Facilities Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable
( %)
1. Concession or subsidy in power tariffs 08 92
2. Upgradation of energy infrastructure for
functioning the unit
02 98
3. Technical surveys for monitoring the use of energy 60 40
4. Energy Audit for minimizing the cost and
environmental defects
59 41
5. Loss due to shortage of power 89 11
6. Enough energy for sustaining the SME unit 85 15
7. Enough water supplies to the unit 90 10
8. Availability of frequency of water supply 87 13
9. Entitled for water subsidy from NMMC 83 17
10. Loss due to the shortage of water supplies 09 91
11. Quick assistance from MIDC in case of damage to
water pipe
90 10
236
Note: The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Infrastructure
facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the
Concession or subsidy in power tariffs is non-favorable to a very large extent
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the
upgradation of energy infrastructure for functioning the units is non-favorable to
a very large extent
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards the
Technical surveys for monitoring the use of energy non favorable to a large
extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Energy
Audit for minimizing the cost and environmental defects is favorable to a large
extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Loss
due to shortage of power is favorable to a large extent
6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards enough
energy for sustaining the SME unit is favorable to a large extent
7) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards enough
water supplies to the unit is favorable to a large extent
8) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards
Availability of frequency of water supply is favorable to a very large extent.
9) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Entitled
for water subsidy from NMMC is favorable to very a large extent.
10) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Loss
due to the shortage of water supplies is favorable to very a large extent.
11) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Quick
assistance from MIDC in case of damage to water pipes favorable to very a
large extent
237
C) Perception of Respondents- Fire Prevention Measures (Fire protection,
fire safety, fire prevention, technical support, fire services)
Table No 7.9
Perception of SME Respondents-Fire Prevention Measures
Sr.No. Fire Prevention Measures Favorable (%) Unfavorable
( %)
1. Fire protection measures to SME unites 73 27
2. Fire safety policy for SMEs 40 60
3. Fire prevention services to SMEs 09 91
4. Technical support for security and Safety
measures
18 82
5. Timely fire services on the happening of
any disaster
42 58
Note:The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Fire Prevention
Measures facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi
Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards Fire
protection measures to SME unites is favorable to very a large extent
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Fire safety
policy for SMEs is favorable to a large extent
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Fire prevention
services to SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Technical
support for security and Safety measures is non-favorable to a very large extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites Timely fire
services on the happening of any disaster is non-favorable to a large extent
238
D) Perception of Respondents- Safety and Security Measures(fire brigade, police
station, safe roads, footpath, experience of theft, environmental protection,
awareness, green design, CEPT performance, technical surveys)
Table No 7.10
Perception of SME Respondents-Safety and Security Measures
Sr.No. Safety and Security Measures Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable
( %)
1. Fire brigade station near to SMEs 97 03
2. Police station near to SMEs 96 04
3. Safe roads for transportation and travelling 37 63
4. Footpath on the road side in MIDC area 45 55
5 Experience of theft and robbery 40 60
6. Good and clean alternative for environmental
protection while allocating land to the SMEs
20 80
7.
Awareness for environmental education among
the SME entrepreneurs.
72 28
8. Green design and green procurement to SMEs 69 31
9. Performance and evaluation of CEPT by MIDC 23 77
10. Technical surveys for environmental safety 44 56
Note:The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Safety and
Security Measures facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt
in Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Fire
brigade station near to SMEs favorable to a very large extent
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Police
station near to SMEs near to SMEs favorable to a very large extent
239
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Safe
roads for transportation and travelling is non-favorable to a large extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Footpath on the road side in MIDC area is non-favorable to a large extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Experience of theft and robbery is non-favorable to a large extent
6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Good
and clean alternative for environmental protection while allocating land to the
SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent
7) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Awareness for environmental education among the SME entrepreneurs is
favorable to a large extent
8) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards Green
design and green procurement to SMEs is non-favorable to a very large extent.
9) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Performance and evaluation of CEPT by MIDC isnon-favorable to a very
large extent
10) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Technical surveys for environmental safety is non-favorable to a large extend
E) Perception of Respondents- Waste Management(efforts for managing waste,
drainage facility, liquid waste management, disposal of waste, EIA)
Table No 7.11
Perception of SME Respondents-Waste Management
Sr.No. Waste Management Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable
( %)
1. Efforts for managing waste by MIDC 87 13
2. drainage facility in MIDC are 90 10
3. Liquid waste management 86 14
4. Disposal of waste 73 27
5. Environmental impact assessment for
hazardouswaste
74 26
240
Note:The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Waste
Management facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in
Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Efforts for managing waste by MIDC is favorable to a very large extent.
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
drainage facility in MIDC area is favorable to a very large extent.
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Liquid waste management is favorable to a very large extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Disposal of waste is favorable to a very large extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Environmental impact assessment for hazardouswaste is favorable to a very
large extent
F) Perception of Respondents- Consultancy (Quality seminars, timely
information, updates, consultancy, MR support, MR updates, MR for
promotion)
Table No 7.12
Perception of SME Respondents-Consultancy
Sr.No. Consultancy Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable
(%)
1. Quality seminars for SME entrepreneurs 58 42
2. Timely information to SME unites 40 60
3. Updates for green technology 57 43
4. Consultancy for ERP to SME unites 29 58
5. marketing research support 39 61
6. marketing research updates 44 66
7. marketing research for promotion of SMEs 35 65
241
Note:The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above -To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Consultancy
facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Quality seminars for SME entrepreneurs is favorable to a large extent
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Timely information to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Updates for green technology is favorable to a large extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Consultancy for ERP to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent
5) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
marketing research support to SME unites is non-favorable to a large extent
6) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
marketing research updates isnon-favorable to a large extent
7) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
marketing research for promotion of SMEs is non-favorable to a large extent
G) Perception of Respondents- Incentives (incentives, interest subsidy,
refund of entry tax, incentive for strengthening SME)
Table No 7.13
Perception of SME Respondents-Incentives
Sr.
No.
Incentives Favorable
(%)
Unfavorable
( %)
1. Incentives by MIDC 17 83
2. interest subsidy 11 89
3. refund of entry tax 11 89
4. Incentives for strengthening the SMEs 54 46
242
Note: The level of satisfaction perceived by SME Respondents
0%-33%-To some extent
34%-66%-To a large extent
67% and above-To a very large extent.
The table revels the following specific findings with reference to Incentives
facilities offered by MIDC in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai.
1) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards
Incentives by MIDC is non-favorable to a very large extent
2) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises(SME) unites towards
interest subsidy is non-favorable to a very large extent
3) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
refund of entry tax is; non-favorable to a very large extent
4) The perception of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) unites towards
Incentives for strengthening the SMEs is favorable to a large extent
243
Table No 7.14
Summary of test of Null-Hypothesis with reference to contribution of MIDC in
the development of Small and Medium Enterprises (SME) in Thane Belapur
Industrial Belt(TBIB),Navi Mumbai.
Null Hypothesis with reference to employability t-test ANOVA
1. There is no significant increase in employability in Navi-
Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).
Rejected NA
Null Hypothesis with reference to Land acquisition and
allotment
Chi-
square
ANOVA
2. There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of
organizational the respondent
Rejected Rejected
3. There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the
respondent .
Accepted NA
4. There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of the
respondent
Rejected Accepted
5. There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent
Accepted NA
Null Hypothesis with reference to Infrastructure Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
244
Null Hypothesis with reference to Water Supply Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Null Hypothesis with reference to Fire prevention
measure
Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Rejected Not
significant
245
Null Hypothesis with reference to Safety and Security Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Null Hypothesis with reference to Waste Management Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
246
Null Hypothesis with reference to Consultancy Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Null Hypothesis with reference to Incentive Chi-
square
ANOVA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Infrastructure for SME and type of organization of the
respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of SME of the respondent „.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and type of industry of the respondent‟
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted NA
Ho „There is no association between level of satisfaction of
infrastructure and annual turnover of the respondent‟.
Accepted Significant
247
7.2 Findings of personal observation:
To assess the contribution of MIDC in the development of Small and Medium
Enterprises (SME) in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai physical
observation were conducted. The criteria considered for evaluation were land
acquisition and allotment by MIDC, infrastructure, fire prevention measures, safety
and security, waste management, consultancy and incentives.
Personal observation-SMEs response to the contribution of MIDC
It was observed that most of the MIDC areas indicate the poor infrastructure except
Nerul, Pawne. Only Rabale MIDC area has the highest satisfaction for power and
water infrastructure. Many Engineering unites needs more power supply as compared
to other SME unites in Navi Mumbai. As far as water infrastructure and supply is
considered, Chemical unites still faces problem of short of water in Navi Mumbai
MIDC area.
It was also observed that, at many MIDC areas proper roads for transportation are not
in well conditions. Quality of the roads is very imperfect for the development of SME
in Thane Belapur Industrial Belt in Navi Mumbai. Especially in Rabale, Pawne and
Mahape MIDC area.
As regards to, safety and security, many MIDC area lakhk in adequate safety and
security mechanism. In Pawne MIDC area highest number of theft and robbery are
taken plakhe.
As per the observation, many chemical SME unites are not satisfied with Common
Effluent Treatment Plant (CETP) which was specially designed for treatment to
industrial waste. Highest number of unsatisfied chemical unites are from Turbhe
MIDC area.in many MIDC area disposal of waste is not as per the standard. Drainage
facilities in many areas are insufficient as per the requirement of the SME unites.
It was observed that, consultancy for strengthening the SME was not enough and
marketing research practices are not upto the remark. Even in case of incentives many
unites are not satisfied.
248
7.3 Findings of personal interview of MIDC Officials
As a part of the study to root out the problems of SMEs and to find out the efforts
taken by MIDC to deploy developmental practices for SMEs.The Researcher
approached to the MIDC officials to conduct interviews. Disappointingly the MIDC
officials refused to provide the information officially, but informally the officials
provided the Information and difficulties they face in providing efficient services to
the SME.
In order to ensure good quality service to SME, MIDC seeks the co-operation
and support from SME by proper use of facilities and services.
7.4 Introduction of Testing of Hypothesis
As per the set objectives and review of literature following hypothesis were designed
by researcher for testing and analyzing. Hypothesis testing begins with an assumption,
called a Hypothesis that we make about population parameter. According to
Prof.Morris Hamburg, “A Hypothesis in statistics is simply a quantitative statement
about a population.” Hypotheses were tested with the help of statistical techniques
like T-test, Chi-square test, ANOVA, Critical Difference (CD).
Following were Null Hypothesis was tested for level of significance of difference.
7.5 Null Hypothesis with reference to employability
1. Null Hypothesis (Ho): There is no significant increase in employability in
Navi-Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).
Alternate Hypothesis11.There is significant increase in employability in Navi-
Mumbai MIDC over a period of interval (2000-2013).
To study above hypothesis information about number of employees in the year 2000
and in 2013 is collected. Following table indicate comparative information only of
those firms which were established before 2000.
249
Table No 7.15
Comparison of Increase in Employment in Pre (2000)
Pre 2000 Total Employment
2000
Total Employment
2013
Number of Firms 76 76
Total Employees 1237.00 3121.00
Average of employees per
firm
16.2763 41.0658
Std. Deviation 17.24691 45.05266
Above table indicate that there are 76 firms established before year 2000.
Comparative study indicates that total employees increased from 1237 to 3121. This
indicates that there is increase of 1884 employees. Increase in employment in 2014 is
152.30 % as compare to employment in 2000.
Table No 7.16
Comparison of Increase in Employment in Post (2013)
Post 2000 Total Employment
2000
Total Employment
2013
Number of Firms 24 24
Total Employees 369.00 940.00
Average of employees per
firm
15.3750 39.1667
Std.Deviation 13.34105 28.75030
Table No 7.17
Comparison of Increase in Total Employment
Total(Pre and Post 2000) Total Employment
2000
Total Employment
2013
Number of Firms 100 100
Total Employees 1606.00 4061.00
Average of employees per
firm
16.0600 40.6100
Std.Deviation 16.33539 41.59786
250
To test above null hypothesis Paired T-test is applied and results are as follows.
Table No.7.18
Paired Samples Statistics of Increase in Employment
Mean N Std.
Deviation
Std.
Error
Mean
Total Employment 2000 16.0600 100 16.33539 1.63354
Total Employment 2013 40.6100 100 41.59786 4.15979
Table No.7.19
Paired Samples Test for Increase in Employment
Paired Differences T –
Calculate
d
Degree
of
Freedo
m
T – Table
at 5%
level of
significanc
e
Result
of Test
Differenc
e of
Mean
Std.
Deviatio
n
Total
employmen
t 2000 and
2013
24.55000 28.626
95
8.576 99 1.96 Rejecte
d
Above table indicate that T-calculated value (8.576) is greater than T-table value
(1.96) at 5% level of significance. Therefore T-test is rejected. Hence null hypothesis
is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted. Conclusion is there is significant
increase in employability from year 2000 to year 2014.
N2. There is no association between type of SME and year of existence with
respect to year 2000.
For testing above null hypothesis chi square test is applied.
251
Table No.7.20
Type of SME and year of existence with respect to year 2000.
Year of Existence and Type of SME
Year of Existence Type of SME Total
Medium Small
Post 2000 6 18 24
Pre 2000 16 60 76
Total 22 78 100
252
Figure No.7.1
Type of SME and year of existence with respect to year 2000.
Figure No.7.2
Year of Existence and Type of SME
Chi-square calculated value: 0.166
Degree of freedom: 1
Chi-square table value (5% loss.) : 3.84
Result of test: Accepted.
253
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (0.166) is less than chi-square
table value (3.84). Therefore test is accepted. Hence null hypothesis is accepted.
Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and year of existence with
respect to year 2000.
This indicate that proportion of small and medium SME before and after 2000 are in
same proportion.
7.6 Null Hypothesis with reference to land acquisition and allotment
3. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of organisation of the
respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table format
b given below
Table No.7.21
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME type of
organization of the respond
Type of organization Satisfaction of land acquisition
and allotment
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 6 13 0 19
Partnership business 0 24 0 24
Private limited companies 4 52 1 57
Total 10 89 1 100
Out of 10 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 06 were from sole
proprietorship, zero unit were from Partnership business and 04 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 89 SME unites from medium level of
satisfaction,13 unites were from Sole properitorship,24 unites were from partnership
business and 52 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 01 SME unites
from high level of satisfaction, zero unites unites were from sole properitorship,zero
unites were from partnership business and 01 unite were from private limited
companies.
254
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows :
Fig No.7.3
Level of satisfaction of Land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of
organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 13.771
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is rejected
Calculated value 13.771 is more than table value (9.49), therefore test is rejected and
null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is
association between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for
SME and type of organisation of the respondent.Which indicate that respondents
from small and medium enterprises have uniform satisfaction about land acquisition
and allotment.
As the above Null Hypothesis got rejected the study was set to have ANOVA table
and to have f-test in order to ascertain the level of significance of variance
255
Table No.7.22
Mean Score of land acquisition and allotment and Type of Organization
Type of Organization N Mean Std. Deviation
Sole proprietorship 19 70.1737 17.19314
Partnership business 24 80.5533 6.34235
Private limited companies 57 77.7760 12.72748
Total 100 76.9981 12.92564
Table No.7.23
ANOVA for land acquisition and allotment and Types of Organization
Sum of
Squares
Df Mean
Square
F-cal F-table Significance
Between
Groups 1222.722 2 611.361 3.872 3.08
Significant
Within Groups 15317.428 97 157.912
Total 16540.150 99
Calculated value is 3.872 which is greater than table value 1.96. therefore conclusion
is there is significant difference in mean scores of satisfaction of land acquisition and
allotment by MIDC and type of organization. Partnership organizations are highly
satisfied as compare to others.
256
Table No.7.24
Critical Values for type of organization and satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment
Type of organization and land satisfaction
No
. Pairs
Number
of
Respon
dents
Mean SD
SE of
diff of
Mean
Differe
nce of
Mean
Calcu
lated
T-
value
Tabl
e T-
valu
e
Significan
ce
1
Proprietor-
ship 19 70.17 17.19
4.26 10.3796 2.43 1.68 Significant
Partnership 24 80.55 6.34
2
Proprietor-
ship 19 70.17 17.19
4.39 7.6023 1.73 1.68 Significant
Private Ltd 57 77.78 12.73
3 Partnership 24 80.55 6.34
2.15 2.7773 1.29 1.68 Non-
significant Private Ltd 57 77.78 12.73
Pair-1: Land satisfaction of partnership organizations is significantly higher than
satisfaction of proprietorship form.
Pair-2: Land satisfaction of private Ltd. Company is significantly higher than
satisfaction of proprietorship form.
Pair 3-3: Land satisfaction of Private Ltd. Company is significantly higher than
satisfaction of Partnership form.
4. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the respondent.
To test the Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table
format given below:
257
Table No.7.25
level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and
type of SME of the respondent.
Out of 10 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 08 unites were
from small enterprises and 02 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 89 SME
unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,70 unites from small
enterprises and 19 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 01 SME unites of
respondents from high level of satisfaction , zero unites were from small enterprises
and 01 unites from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No.7.4
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME and type of SME
of the respondents.
Type of SME Satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment Total
Low Medium High
Small 8 70 0 78
Medium 2 19 1 22
Total 10 89 1 100
258
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 3.591
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 02
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 3.591 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.
259
5. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of the respondent
To test the Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table
format given below:
Table No.7.26
level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and
type of industry of the respondent
Type of Industries Satisfaction of land acquisition
and allotment
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 1 38 0 39
Chemical 6 15 1 22
Others 2 30 0 32
Pharmaceutical 1 1 0 2
Textile 0 5 0 5
Total 10 89 1 100
Out of 10 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 01 unites were from
Engineering, 06 unites were from Chemical, 02 unites were from others, 01 unit were
from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were from textile. Out of 89 SME units
respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 38 unites were from Engineering, 06
unites were from Chemical, 30 unites were from others, 01 unite were from
pharmaceuticals and o5 unites were from textile. Out of 01 SME units respondents
from high level of satisfaction, zero unites were from Engineering, 01 unites were
from Chemical, zero unites were from Others, zero unit from pharmaceuticals and
zero unit were from textile.
260
The above data is presented in multiple bars diagram as follows
Fig no.7.5
Level of satisfaction of Land acquisition and allotment for SME and Type of
Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 18.290
Table value: 15.15
Degree of freedom: 08
Result of the test: Test is rejected
Calculated value 18.290 is more than table value (15.15), therefore test is rejected and
null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted: There is association
between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of
industry of the respondent
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises have uniform
satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.
261
Table No.7.27
Mean Score of land acquisition and allotment and Type of Industry
Type of Industry Mean N Std. Deviation
Chemical 71.2114 22 15.58395
Engineering 79.0577 39 11.91752
Others 78.1228 32 11.54374
Pharmaceuticals 66.6650 2 23.56787
Textile 83.3300 5 .00000
Total 76.9981 100 12.92564
Table No.7.28
ANOVA for land acquisition and allotment and Type of Industry
Sum of
Squares
Df Mean
Square
F-calculated F-
table.
Result
Between
Groups 1356.624 4 339.156 2.122 2.46
Accepted
Within Groups 15183.526 95 159.827
Total 16540.150 99
The above table indicates that the calculated f-value(2.122) is less than table (2.46) at
5% level of significance.
This indicate that the Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted that: There is association
between level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and type of industry of
the respondent.
262
6. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent.
To test the Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table
format given below:
Table No.7.29
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment and
annual turnover of the respondent.
Annual Turnover Satisfaction of land acquisition
and allotment
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakhs 1 9 0 10
25 to 50 lakhs 1 20 0 21
Above50 lakhs 8 60 1 69
Total 10 89 1 100
Out of 10 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from below
25 lakh group,01 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 08 unites were from
above 50 lakh group. Out of 89 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group,
09 unites were from below 25 lakh group,20 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,
and 60 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 01 SME Unites from high level
of satisfaction group, zero unites from below 25 lakh group,01 units from 25 to 50
lakh group, and 01 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
263
Fig No : 7.6
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment for SME and annual
turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.326
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.326 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of land acquisition and annual turnover of the respondent.
which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure
264
7. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between satisfaction of land
acquisition of allotment by policy of MIDC in Navi Mumbai and development of
SME
To test the Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the table
format given below:
Table No.7.30
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition and
allotment policy and development of SME
Satisfaction of land Development of SME Total
Medium Small
High 1 0 1
Low 2 8 10
Medium 19 70 89
Total 22 78 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Figure No 7.7
Level of satisfaction of land acquisition of allotment policy and development of SME
265
Chi-square calculated value: 3.591
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% loss.): 5.99
Result of test: Accepted.
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (3.591) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association between
type of SME and satisfaction of land acquisition and allotment by policy of
MIDC in Navi Mumbai. Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium
enterprises has uniform satisfaction about land acquisition and allotment.
266
7.7 Null Hypothesis with reference to power supply
8. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
power supply for SME and Type of organization of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No 7.31
Level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of organization of the respondents
Type of organization Level of satisfaction of power Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 3 9 7 19
Partnership business 2 15 7 24
Private limited companies 8 42 7 57
Total 13 66 21 100
Out of 100 SME units respondents from SME, 21 19 from sole proprietorship, 24
were from Partnership business and 57 were from private limited companies. Out of
19 Sole proprietorship, 3 unites from low level of satisfaction,9 were from medium
level of satisfaction and 7 were from high level of satisfaction. Out of 24 partnership
business,2 unites from low level of satisfaction,15 were from medium level of
satisfaction and 7 were from high level of satisfaction. out of 57 Private limited
companies ,27unites from low level of satisfaction,8 were from medium level of
satisfaction and 42 were from high level of satisfaction.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
267
Figure no.7.8
level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 7.213
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 7.213 is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of power supply for SME and Type of organization of the
respondent.
Which indicate that all three types of organization has uniform satisfaction about
power infrastructure.
268
9. Null Hypothesis(Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
power supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No 7.32
level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of SME of the respondents
Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Power Total
Low Medium High
Small 10 50 18 78
Medium 3 16 3 22
Total 13 66 21 100
Out of 100 SME units respondents from SME, 78 unites from small enterprises, 22
unites were from medium enterprises, out of 78 small enterprises ,18 unites from low
level of satisfaction,150were from medium level of satisfaction and 18 were from
high level of satisfaction. out of 22 medium enterprise ,03 unites from low level of
satisfaction,16 were from medium level of satisfaction and 03 were from high level of
satisfaction.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig no. : 7.9
level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of organization of the respondents
269
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 930
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 02
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 930 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and null
hypothesis is accepted that is:There is no association between level of satisfaction
of power supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure.
270
10. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
power supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.33
Level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of industry of the respondent.
Type of industry Level of satisfaction of Power Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 5 26 8 39
Chemical 4 15 3 22
Others 3 3 10 32
Pharmaceutical 0 2 0 2
Textile 1 4 0 5
Total 13 66 21 100
Out of 13 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 05 unites from
Engineering, 04 unites were from Chemical, 03 unites from others, zero from
pharmaceuticals and o1 textile. Out of 66 SME units respondents from medium level
of satisfaction, 26 unites from Engineering, 15 unites were from Chemical, 03 unites
from Others, 02 from pharmaceuticals and o4 from textile Out of 21 SME units
respondents from high level of satisfaction, 03 unites from Engineering, 08unites
were from Chemical, 32 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and zero from
textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
271
Figure No. 7.10
level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 5.601
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom: 08
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 5.601 is less than table value (15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of power supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure.
272
11. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
power supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.34
Level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Power Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 3 7 0 10
25 to 50 lakh 0 15 6 21
Above 50 lakh 10 44 15 69
Total 13 66 21 100
Out of 13 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,03 from below 25 lakh
group,zero from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 10 were from above 50 lakh group. Out of
66 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group,015 from below 25 lakh
group,44 from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 07 were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 21
SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group, zero from below 25 lakh group,06
from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 15 were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Figure No. 7.11
Level of satisfaction of power supply for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
273
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 7.933
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 7.933 is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted There is no association between level of satisfaction of
power supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure.
274
12. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is association between development of SME and
level of satisfaction of development of power infrastructure by MIDC in Navi-
Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No: 7.35
Level of satisfaction of power infrastructure and Type of SME
Level of satisfaction of power
infrastructure
Development of
SME
Total
Medium Small
High 3 18 21
Low 3 10 13
Medium 16 50 66
Total 22 78 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.12
Level of satisfaction of power infrastructure and Type of SME
275
Chi-square calculated value : 0.93
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% loss.) : 5.99
Result of test: Accepted.
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (0.930) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted. Hence null hypothesis is accepted.
Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and level of
satisfaction of development of power infrastructure by MIDC in Navi-Mumbai
This indicate that proportion satisfaction of small and medium SME for power
infrastructure is uniform.
276
7.8 Null Hypothesis with reference to water supply
13. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
water supply for SME and Type of organisation of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.36
Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
Type of organization of the respondents
Type of organization Level of satisfaction of Water
supply
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 5 13 1 19
Partnership business 4 19 1 24
Private limited Company 8 38 1 57
Total 27 70 3 100
Out of 27 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 05 were from sole
proprietorship, 04 were from Partnership business and 08 were from private limited
companies. Out of 70 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,13 were from
Sole properitorship,19 unites from partnership business and 08 were from private
limited companies. Out of o3 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 01 were
from sole properitorship,01 were from partnership business and 01 were from private
limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No. : 7.13
Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
type of organization of the respondents
277
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 2.508
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 2.508is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of organisation of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises have uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure.
278
14. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
water supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no.: 7.37
level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of SME of the
respondents
Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total
Low Medium High
Small 20 55 3 78
Medium 7 15 0 22
Total 27 70 3 100
Out of 27 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 20 unites from small
enterprises and 07 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 70SME unites
respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,55 unites from small enterprises and
15 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 03 level of satisfaction, 03 unites
were from small enterprises and zero unites from medium enterprises
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows:
Fig no.: 7.14
Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
type of SME of the respondents
279
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.102
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom : 02
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.102 is less than table value(5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is : There is no association between level of
satisfaction of water supply for SME and Type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises have uniform
satisfaction about water supply.
280
15. Null Hypothesis(Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
water supply for SME and Type of industry of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. 7.38
level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
Type of industry of the respondents
Type of industry Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 11 28 0 39
Chemical 9 12 1 22
Others 5 25 2 32
Pharmaceutical 1 1 0 2
Textile 1 4 0 5
Total 27 70 3 100
Out of 27 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 11 unites
fromEngineering ,09 unites were from Chemical, 05 unites from Others,01 unit from
pharmaceuticals and o1 unit from textile. Out of 70 SME units respondents from
medium level of satisfaction, 28 unites fromEngineering , 12 unites were from
Chemical, 25 unites from Others, 01 from pharmaceuticals and o4 from textile Out of
03 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, zero unites from
Engineering , 01 unites were from Chemical, 02 unites from Others, zero from
pharmaceuticals and zero unit from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
281
Fig no. : 7.15
Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 7.551
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom : 08
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 7.551 is less than table value(15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted. which indicate that respondents from small and medium
enterprises has uniform satisfaction about Water infrastructure
282
16. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
water supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.39
level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Water supply Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 3 7 0 10
25 to 50 lakh 4 16 1 21
Above 50 lakh 20 47 2 69
Total 27 70 03 100
Out of 27 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,03 from below 25 lakh
group,04 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group and 10 unites were from above 50 lakh
group. Out of 70 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 07 unites were
from below 25 lakh group,16 from 25 to 50 lakh group and 47 unites were from above
50 lakh group. Out of 03 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group, zero
unites from below 25 lakh group,01 unite from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 02 unites
were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Figure no. 7.16
Level of satisfaction of water supply for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
283
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.296
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.296 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of water supply for SME and annual turnover of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about Waterinfrastructure.
284
17. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between development of
SME and level of satisfaction of water supply by MIDC in Navi Mumbai
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.40
Level of satisfaction of Water supply and Type of SME
Level of satisfaction of Water supply Development of SME Total
Medium Small
High 0 3 3
Low 7 20 27
Medium 15 55 70
Total 22 78 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Figure no.7.16
Level of satisfaction of Water supply and Type of SME
Chi-square calculated value: 1.102
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.): 5.99
Result of test: Accepted.
285
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (1.102) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association between
type of SME and level of satisfaction of water supply by MIDC in Navi Mumbai.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about water supply.
286
7.9 Null Hypothesis with reference to fire prevention and protection
18. Null Hypothesis(Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
Fire prevention measures for SME and type of organisation of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table.
Table no. : 7.41
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and
type of organisation of the respondents
Type of organization Level of satisfaction of Fire
prevention measures for
SME
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 1 8 10 19
Partnership Business 5 15 4 24
Private limited company 8 31 18 57
Total 14 54 32 100
Out of 14 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 01 was from sole
proprietorship, 05 were from Partnership business and 08 were from private limited
companies. Out of 54 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,08 unites were
from Sole properitorship,15 unites from partnership business and 31 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 32 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 10
unites were from sole proprietorship, 04 unites were from partnership business and 18
unites were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
287
Figure No7.18
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of
organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 6.951
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 6.951 is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of organisation of the
respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about fire protection and prevention services.
288
19. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction
of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.42
level of satisfaction Fire prevention measures of for SME and type of SME of
the respondents
Out of 14 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 09 unites from
small enterprises and 05 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 54 SME unites
of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,43 unites from small enterprises
and 11 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 32 SME unites of respondents
from high level of satisfaction , 26 unites were from small enterprises and 06 unites
from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Figure no. 7.19
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of
the respondents
Type of SME Level of satisfaction of fire protection
and prevention measures
Total
Low Medium High
Small 9 43 26 78
Medium 5 11 6 22
Total 14 54 32 100
289
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.815
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 02
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.815 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and type of SME of the
respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about fire prevention measures
290
20. Null Hypothesis (Ho):-There is no association between level of satisfaction of
fire protection and prevention measures for SME and type of Industry of the
respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.43
level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures for
SME and type of Industry of the respondents
Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of fire protection
and prevention measures
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 6 20 13 39
Chemical 2 18 2 22
Others 4 15 13 32
Pharmaceuticals 1 0 1 2
Textile 1 1 3 5
Total 14 54 32 100
Out of 14 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 06 unites
fromEngineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 04 unites from Others,01 unit from
pharmaceuticals and o1 unit from textile. Out of 54 SME units respondents from
medium level of satisfaction, 20 unites fromEngineering ,18 unites were from
Chemical, 15 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and o1 from textile. Out
of 32 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, 13 unites were from
Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 13 unites were from Others, one unit
from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
291
Fig no. : 7.20
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 13.922
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom : 08
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 13.922 is less than table value (15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures for SME and type of
Industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about fire protection and prevention measures.
292
21. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of
satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of SME in Navi-
Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.44
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and
annual turnover of SME in Navi-Mumbai
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of fire
prevention measures facility
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 1 4 5 10
25 to 50 lakh 7 7 7 21
Above 50 lakh 6 43 20 69
Total 14 54 32 100
Out of 14 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from below
25 lakh group,07 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 06 unites were from above
50 lakh group. Out of 54 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 04
unites were from below 25 lakh group,07 unites were from from 25 to 50 lakh
group,and 43 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 32 SME Unites from high
level of satisfaction group,05 unites from below 25 lakh group,07 unite from 25 to 50
lakh group,and 20 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
293
Fig no. : 7.21
Level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Calculated value is greater than table value. Therefore test is rejected. Hence null
hypothesis is rejected. Alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is association
between level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of
SME in Navi-Mumbai.
Conclusion is there is association between turn over and satisfaction of fire protection
and prevention measures .
For detail study mean satisfaction score for each group are obtained as follows
Table No 7.45
Mean Score of fire prevention measures
Annual Turnover Mean N Std. Deviation
25 to 50 lakh 25.0000 21 20.91650
Above 50 lakh 31.8841 69 18.13149
Below 25 lakh 35.0000 10 17.48015
Total 30.7500 100 18.75379
Above table indicate that mean score for turnover of Below 25 lakh is maximum and
for 25 to 50 lakh is minimum.Difference between mean scores is significant or not it
is tested by ANOVA followed by F-test
294
Table No.7.46
ANOVA score of fire prevention measures
Sum of
Squares
Df Mean
Square
F-
Calculated
F-
table
Between
Groups
963.678 2 481.839 1.381 3.08 Not
Significant
Within
Groups
33855.072 97 349.021
Total 34818.750 99
Above table indicate that F-calculated value is 1.381 which is less than standard table
value 1.96. This indicate that there is no significant difference in mean scores of
satisfaction.
This indicates that Null Hypothesis (Ho) is accepted tha is: There is association
between level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures and annual turnover of
SME in Navi-Mumbai.
295
22. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between development of SME
and level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in
Navi Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no.: 7.47
Level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures and Type of SME
Level of satisfaction of fire protection
and prevention measures
Development of SME Total
Small Medium
Low 9 5 14
Medium 43 11 54
High 26 6 32
Total 22 78 100
Fig no. : 7.22
Level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures and Type of SME
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square calculated value : 1.815
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99
Result of test : Accepted.
296
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (1.815) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association
between development of SME and level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures by MIDC in Navi Mumbai.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about fire protection and prevention measures.
297
23. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between development of SME
and level of satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in
Navi Mumbai
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table
Table no. : 7.48
Level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures and development of SME
Level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures
Development of SME Total
Small Medium
Low 9 5 14
Medium 43 11 54
High 26 6 32
Total 78 22 100
Fig no. : 7.23
Level of satisfaction of fire protection and
prevention measures and development of SME
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square calculated value : 1.815
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99
Result of test : Accepted.
298
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (1.815) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted. Hence null hypothesis is accepted.
Conclusion is There is no association between type of SME and level of
satisfaction of fire protection and prevention measures by MIDC in Navi
Mumbai
299
7.10 Null Hypothesis with reference to safety and security
24. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
safety and security and type of organization in Navi-Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.49
level of satisfaction of safety and security and
type of organization in Navi-Mumbai
Type of Organization Level of satisfaction of safety
and security
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 2 13 4 19
Partnership business 4 14 6 24
Private limited companies 6 42 9 57
Total 12 69 19 100
Out of 12 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 02 were from sole
proprietorship, 04 were from Partnership business and 06 were from private limited
companies. Out of 69 SME unites from medium level of satisfaction,13 unites were
from Sole properitorship,14 unites from partnership business and 42 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 19 SME unites from high level of satisfaction, 04
unites were from sole proprietorship, 06 unites were from partnership business and 09
unites were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
300
Fig no. : 7.24
Level of satisfaction of safety and security for SME
and type of organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.957
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.957 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of safety and security and type of organization in Navi-Mumbai.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about safety and security.
301
25. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of
satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME inNavi-Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no 7.50
level of satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME
Type of SME Level of satisfaction of safety and
security
Total
Low Medium High
Small 10 53 5 78
Medium 2 16 4 22
Total 12 69 9 100
Out of 12 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 10 unites were
from small enterprises and 02 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 69 SME
unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,53 unites from small
enterprises and 16 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 09 SME unites of
respondents from high level of satisfaction , 05 unites were from small enterprises and
04 unites from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
302
Fig no. : 7.25
Level of satisfaction of safety and security for
SME and type of SME of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 0.266
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom : 02
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value o.266 is less than table value(5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of safety and security and type of SME in Navi-Mumbai.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about safety and security.
303
26. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of
satisfaction of safety and security and type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.51
level of of satisfaction of safety and security and
type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.
Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of safety and
security
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 4 29 6 39
Chemical 4 17 1 22
Others 4 17 11 32
Pharmaceutical 0 2 0 2
Textile 0 4 1 5
Total 12 69 19 100
Out of 14 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 06 unites from
Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 04 unites from Others,01 unit from
pharmaceuticals and o1 unit from textile. Out of 54 SME units respondents from
medium level of satisfaction, 20 unites from Engineering, 18 unites were from
Chemical, 15 unites from Others, zero from pharmaceuticals and o1 from textile. Out
of 32 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction, 13 unites were from
Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 13 unites were from Others, one unit
from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
304
Fig no. : 7.26
level of satisfaction of Fire prevention measures for SME
and Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 10.613
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom : 08
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 10.613 is less than table value(15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of safety and security and type of industry in Navi-Mumbai.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about safety and security.
305
27. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association level of satisfaction of safety
and security and annual turnover of the respondents.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.52
levellevel of satisfaction of safety and security
and annual turnover of the respondents.
Annual turnover Level of satisfaction of safety and
security
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 1 5 4 10
25 to 50 lakh 3 15 3 21
Above 50 lakh 8 49 12 69
Total 12 69 19 100
Out of 12 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from below
25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 08 unites were from above
50 lakh group. Out of 69 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 05
unites were from below 25 lakh group,15 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and
49 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 19 SME Unites from high level of
satisfaction group,04 unites were from below 25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to
50 lakh group, and 12 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
306
Fig no. : 7.27
Level of satisfaction of safety and security for SME
and annual turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 3.377
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 3.377 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association level of satisfaction of
safety and security and annual turnover of the respondents.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about safety and security.
307
28. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between type of SME and
level of satisfaction of safety and security services by MIDC in Navi Mumbai
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. : 7.53
Level of satisfaction of safety and security measures and development of SME
Level of satisfaction of safety and security Development of SME Total
Small Medium
Low 10 2 12
Medium 53 16 69
High
15 4 19
Total 78 22 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.28
Level of satisfaction of safety and security measures and development of SME
308
Chi-square calculated value : 0.266
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99
Result of test : Accepted.
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (0.266) is less than chi-square
table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association between
type of SME and level of satisfaction of safety and security services by MIDC in
Navi Mumbai.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about safety and security.
309
7.11 Null Hypothesis with reference to waste management
29. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of waste management and type of organization of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table
Table no. : 7.54
level of satisfaction of waste management and
type of organization of the respondent
Type of Organization Level of satisfaction of Waste
Management
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 3 16 0 19
Partnership business 1 22 1 24
Private limited companies 8 47 2 57
Total 12 85 3 100
Out of 12 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 03 were from sole
proprietorship, 01 units were from Partnership business and 08 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 85 SME unites from medium level of
satisfaction,16 unites were from Sole properitorship,22 unites were from partnership
business and 47 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 03 SME unites
from high level of satisfaction, zero unites were from sole proprietorship, 01 unites
were from partnership business and 02 unite were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows :
310
Fig no. : 7.29
Level of satisfaction of waste management for SME
and type of organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 2.550
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 2.550 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of waste management and type of organization of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about waste management.
311
30. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of waste management and type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. : 7.55
Level of of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
type of SME of the respondents
Type of SME Level of satisfaction Waste
Management
Total
Low Medium High
Small 11 65 2 78
Medium 1 20 1 22
Total 12 85 3 100
Out of 12 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 11 unites were
from small enterprises and 01 unites were from medium enterprises out of 85 SME
unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,65 unites from small
enterprises and 20 unites were from medium enterprises out of 03 SME unites of
respondents from high level of satisfaction , 02 unites were from small enterprises and
01 unites from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follow
312
Fig no. : 7.30
Level of of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
type of SME of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.647
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 02
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.647 is less than table value(5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of waste management and type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises have uniform
satisfaction about waste management.
313
31. There is no association between level of satisfaction of waste management
and type of industry of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. 7.56
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
Type of Industry Level of satisfaction Waste
Management
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 3 35 1 39
Chemical 2 19 1 22
Others 5 26 1 32
Pharmaceuticals 0 2 0 2
Textile 2 3 0 5
Total 12 85 3 100
Out of 12 SME units respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 03 unites were
from Engineering , 02 unites were from Chemical, 05 unites from Others, zero unit
were from pharmaceuticals and o2 unit were from textile. Out of 85 SME units
respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 35 unites from Engineering , 19 unites
were from Chemical, 26 unites from Others, two unites were from pharmaceuticals
and o2 from textile. Out of 03 SME units respondents were from high level of
satisfaction, 01 unites were from Engineering , 01 unites were from Chemical, 01
unites were from Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were
from textile.
314
The above data is presented in multiple bars diagram as follows
Fig no. : 7.31
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 5.608
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom : 08
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 5.608 is less than table value(15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: . There is no association between level of
satisfaction of waste management and type of industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about waste management.
315
32. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of waste management and annual turnover of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. : 7.57
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Waste
Management
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 1 9 0 10
25 to 50 lakh 3 18 0 21
Above 50 lakh 8 58 3 69
Total 12 85 3 100
Out of 12 SME Unites were from low level of satisfaction group,01 units were from
below 25 lakh group,03 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 08 unites were
from above 50 lakh group. Out of 85 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction
group, 09 unites were from below 25 lakh group,18 from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 58
unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 03 SME Unites were from high level of
satisfaction group,zero unites were from below 25 lakh group, zero unite from 25 to
50 lakh group, and 03 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
316
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.32
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.520
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom : 04
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.520 is less than table value(9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of waste management and annual turnover of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about waste management.
317
33. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between development of SME
and level of satisfaction of waste management by MIDC.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No : 7. 58
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management and Type of SME
Level of satisfaction of Waste
Management
Development of SME Total
Small Medium
Low 11 1 3
High 2 1 12
Medium 65 20 85
Total 78 22 100
The above data is presented in multiple bars diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.33
Level of satisfaction of Waste Management and Type of SME
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square calculated value : 1.647
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99
Result of test : Accepted.
318
Above results indicate that chi-square calculated value (1.647) is less than chi-square
Table value (5.99). Therefore test is accepted that is: There is no association
between type of sme of level of satisfaction of waste management.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about waste management.
319
7.12 Null Hypothesis with reference to consultancy
34. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of consultancy and type of organisation of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. : 7. 59
Level of satisfaction of Consultancy and Type of SME
Type of organization Level of satisfaction of
Consultancy
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 7 8 4 19
Partnership business 9 4 11 24
Private Limited companies 33 12 12 57
Total 49 24 27 100
Out of 49 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 07 were from sole
proprietorship, 09 units were from Partnership business and 33 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 27 SME unites from medium level of
satisfaction,04 unites were from Sole properitorship,11 unites were from partnership
business and 12 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 24 SME unites
from high level of satisfaction, 08 unites were from sole properitorship, 04 unites
were from partnership business and 12 unite were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
320
Fig no. : 7.34
Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and
type of organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 10.388
Table value: 0.109
Degree of freedom : 06
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 10.388 is less than table value (.109), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of consultancy and type of organisation of the respondent .
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about consultancy.
321
35. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of
satisfaction of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.60
levellevel of satisfaction of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.
Type of SME Level of satisfaction of Consultancy Total
Low Medium High
Small 38 21 19 78
Medium 11 6 5 22
Total 49 27 24 100
Out of 49 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 38 unites were
from small enterprises and 11 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 27 SME
unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction ,21 unites from small
enterprises and 06 unites were from medium enterprises. out of 24 SME unites of
respondents from high level of satisfaction , 19 unites were from small enterprises and
05 unites from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig no. : 7. 35
Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and type of SME of the respondents
322
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: . 997
Table value: 7.81
Degree of freedom : 03
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value .997 is less than table value(7.81), therefore test is accepted and null
hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of satisfaction
of consultancy and type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about consultancy.
323
36. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No : 7.61
Level of satisfaction of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.
Type of Industries Level of satisfaction of
Consultancy
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 20 11 8 39
Chemical 11 8 3 22
Others 15 7 10 32
Pharmaceuticals 1 1 0 2
Textile 2 0 3 5
Total 49 27 24 100
Out of 49 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 20 unites from
Engineering , 11 unites were from Chemical, 15 unites from Others,01 unit from
pharmaceuticals and o2 unit from textile. Out of 27 SME units respondents from
medium level of satisfaction, 11 unites from Engineering , 08 unites were from
Chemical, 07 unites from Others, 01 unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit
were from textile. Out of 24 SME units respondents from high level of satisfaction,
08 unites were from Engineering , 03 unites were from Chemical, 10 unites were from
Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and three unit were from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bars diagram as follows
324
Fig no. : 7.36
Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and Type of Industry of the
respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is:
Chi-square: 10.228
Table value: 21.03
Degree of freedom : 12
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 10.228 is less than table value(21.03), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of consultancy and type of industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about consultancy.
325
37. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.62
level of satisfaction of consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of
Consultancy
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 3 2 5 10
25 to 50 lakh 12 6 3 21
Above 50 lakh 34 19 16 69
Total 49 27 24 100
Out of 49 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,03 from below 25 lakh
group,12 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group, and 34 unites were from above 50 lakh
group. Out of 27 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 02 unites were
from below 25 lakh group,06 units were from 25 to 50 lakhs group, and 19 unites
were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 24 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction
group,05 unites were from below 25 lakh group,03 units were from 25 to 50 lakh
group,and 16 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
326
Fig no. : 7.37
Level of satisfaction of consultancy for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 5.282
Table value: 12.59
Degree of freedom : 06
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 5.282 is less than table value (12.59), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of consultancy and annual turnover of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about consultancy.
327
38. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
consultancy and development of SME
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.63
level of satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME
Level of satisfaction of consultancy
Development of
SME
Total
Small Medium
Low 42 13 55
Medium 33 9 42
High 0 3 3
Total 78 22 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig no. : 7.38
level of satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME
Chi-square calculated value : 0.940
Degree of freedom: 2
Chi-square table value (5% l.o.s.) : 5.99
Result of test : Accepted.
328
Calculated value 0.940 is less than table value(5.99), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of consultancy and development of SME.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about consultancy.
329
7.13 Null Hypothesis with reference to marketing research
39. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
marketing research and type of organization of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.64
level of satisfaction of marketing research and
type of organization of the respondent
Out of 48 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 10 were from sole
proprietorship, 13 units were from Partnership business and 25 unites were from
private limited companies. Out of 18 SME unites from medium level of
satisfaction,01 unites were from Sole properitorship,03 unites were from partnership
business and 14 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 34 SME unites
from high level of satisfaction, 08 unites were from sole proprietorship, 08 unites
were from partnership business and 18 unite were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Type of organization Level of satisfaction Market
Research
Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 10 1 8 19
Partnership business 13 3 8 24
Private limited companies 25 14 18 57
Total 48 18 34 100
330
Fig no. 7. 39
Level of satisfaction of Marketing Research for SME and
type of organization of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 5.809
Table value: 12.59
Degree of freedom : 06
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 5.809 is less than table value(12.59), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of marketing research and type of organization of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about marketing research.
331
40. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No : 7.65
levellevel of satisfaction of marketing research and
type of SME of the respondent
Level of satisfaction of
consultancy
Development of SME Total
Small Medium
Low 38 10 48
Medium 11 07 18
High 29 05 34
Total 78 22 100
Out of 48 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 38 unites were
from small enterprises and 10 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 18 SME
unites of respondents from medium level of satisfaction, 11 unites from small
enterprises and 07 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 34 SME unites of
respondents from high level of satisfaction , 29 unites were from small enterprises
and 05 unites were from medium enterprises .
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig no : 7.40
level of satisfaction of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent
332
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 6.067
Table value: 7.81
Degree of freedom: 03
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 6.067 is less than table value (7.81), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of marketing research and type of SME of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about marketing research.
333
41. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
marketing research and type of industry of the respondent.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table no. : 7.66
level of satisfaction of marketing research and
type of industry of the respondent.
Type of Industry Level of satisfaction of Market
Research
Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 20 8 11 39
Chemical 10 4 8 22
Others 14 6 12 32
Pharmaceuticals 2 0 0 2
Textile 2 0 3 5
Total 48 18 34 100
Out of 48 SME units respondents from low level of satisfaction, 20 unites were from
Engineering, 10 unites were from Chemical, 14 unites were from others, 02 unit were
from pharmaceuticals and o2 unit were from textile. Out of 18 SME units respondents
from medium level of satisfaction, 8 unites were from Engineering, 4 unites were
from Chemical, 6 unites were from others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and
zero unit were from textile. Out of 34 SME units respondents from high level of
satisfaction, 11 unites were fromEngineering , 08 unites were from Chemical, 12
unites were from Others, zero unit were from pharmaceuticals and three unit were
from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple nbars diagram as follows
334
Fig no. : 7.41
Level of satisfaction of marketing research for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 5.767
Table value: 21.03
Degree of freedom : 12
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 5.767 is less than table value(21.03), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of marketing research and type of industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about marketing research.
335
42. Null Hypothesis (Ho) :- There is no association between level of satisfaction
of marketing research and turnover of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No : 7.67
Level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of Market
Research
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 5 1 4 10
25 to 50 lakh 10 3 8 21
Above 50 lakh 33 14 22 69
Total 48 18 34 100
Out of 48 SME Unites from low level of satisfaction group,05 from below 25 lakh
group,10 unites from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 33 unites were from above 50 lakh
group. Out of 18 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction group, 01 unites were
from below 25 lakh group,03 from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 14 unites were from above
50 lakh group. Out of 34 SME Unites from high level of satisfaction group,04 unites
were from below 25 lakh group,08 unite were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 22 unites
were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
336
Fig No : 7.42
Level of satisfaction of marketing research for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 1.555
Table value: .956
Degree of freedom : 06
Result of the test : Test is accepted
Calculated value 1.555 is less than table value (.956), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about power infrastructure.
337
43. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
marketing research and turnover of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No : 7.68
level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent
Level of satisfaction of consultancy
Development of
SME
Total
Small Medium
Low 38 10 48
Medium 11 07 18
High 29 05 34
Total 78 22 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.43
level of satisfaction of marketing research and turnover of the respondent
338
7.14 Null Hypothesis with reference to incentives
44. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
incentives and type of organizations of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No: 7.68
level of satisfaction of incentives and type of organizations of the respondent
Type of organization Level of satisfaction of incentives Total
Low Medium High
Sole proprietorship 2 13 4 19
Partnership business 3 18 3 24
Private limited companies 8 45 4 57
Total 13 76 11 100
Out of 13 SME units of respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 02 unites
were from sole proprietorship, 03 units were from Partnership business and 08 unites
were from private limited companies. Out of 76 SME unites from medium level of
satisfaction,13 unites were from Sole properitorship,18 unites were from partnership
business and 45 unites were from private limited companies. Out of 11 SME unites
from high level of satisfaction, 04 unites were from sole proprietorship, 03 unites
were from partnership business and 04 unite were from private limited companies.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No : 7.44
Level of satisfaction of Incentives for SME and
type of organization of the respondents
339
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-Square Tests
Chi-square: 2.969
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 2.969 is less than table value (9.49), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted. Which indicate that respondents from small and medium
enterprises has uniform satisfaction about power infrastructure
340
45. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
incentives and type of SME of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No: 7.69
level of satisfaction of incentives and type of SME of the respondent
Level of satisfaction of consultancy Development of
SME
Total
Small Medium
Low 10 3 55
Medium 59 17 42
High 9 2 3
Total 78 22 100
Out of 13 SME units of respondents from low level of satisfaction, 10 unites were
from small enterprises and 03 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 76 SME
unites of respondents were from medium level of satisfaction, 59 unites were from
small enterprises and 17 unites were from medium enterprises. Out of 11 SME unites
of respondents from high level of satisfaction, 02 unites were from small enterprises
and 09 unites from medium enterprises.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No: 7.44
Level of satisfaction of incentives for SME and type of SME of the respondents
341
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: .108
Table value: 5.99
Degree of freedom: 02
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value .108 is less than table value (5.99), therefore test is accepted and null
hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of satisfaction
of incentives and type of SME of the respondent
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about incentives .
342
46. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
incentives and type of industry of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No: 7. 70
level of satisfaction of incentives and type of industry of the respondent
Type of Industries Incentives satisfaction level Total
Low Medium High
Engineering 7 30 2 39
Chemical 5 16 1 22
Others 1 24 7 32
Pharmaceuticals 0 2 0 2
Textile 0 4 1 5
Total 13 76 11 100
Out of 13 SME units respondents were from low level of satisfaction, 07 unites were
from Engineering , 05 unites were from Chemical, 01 unites were from Others, zero
unit were from pharmaceuticals and zero unit were from textile. Out of 76 SME units
respondents were from medium level of satisfaction, 30 unites were from
Engineering, 16 unites were from Chemical, 24 unites were from Others, 02 unites
were from pharmaceuticals and o4 unites were from textile. Out of 11 SME units
respondents from high level of satisfaction, 02 unites were from Engineering ,
01unites were from Chemical, 07 unites were from Others, zero unit were from
pharmaceuticals and one unit were from textile.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
343
Fig no. : 7.45
Level of satisfaction of Incentives for SME and
Type of Industry of the respondents
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 11.932
Table value: 15.51
Degree of freedom: 08
Result of the test: Test is accepted
Calculated value 11.932 is less than table value (15.51), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is: There is no association between level of
satisfaction of incentives and type of industry of the respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about incentives.
344
47. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of
satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the respondent
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No: 7.71
Level of satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the respondent
Annual Turnover Level of satisfaction of
incentives
Total
Low Medium High
Below 25 lakh 1 5 4 10
25 to 50 lakh 0 19 2 21
Above 50 lakh 12 52 5 69
Total 13 76 11 100
Out of 13 SME Unites were from low level of satisfaction group,01 unit were from
below 25 lakh group,zero unite were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 12 unites were
from above 50 lakh group. Out of 76 SME Unites from middle level of satisfaction
group, 05 unites were from below 25 lakh group,19 unites were from 25 to 50 lakh
group,and 52 unites were from above 50 lakh group. Out of 11 SME Unites were
from high level of satisfaction group,04 unites were from below 25 lakh group,02
unites were from 25 to 50 lakh group,and 05 unites were from above 50 lakh group.
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig no. : 7.46
Level of satisfaction of Incentives for SME and
annual turnover of the respondents
345
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square: 13.866
Table value: 9.49
Degree of freedom: 04
Result of the test: Test is rejected
Calculated value 13.866 is more than table value (9.49), therefore test is rejected and
null hypothesis is rejected and alternate hypothesis is accepted that is: There is
association between level of satisfaction of incentives and annual turnover of the
respondent.
Which indicate that a respondent from small and medium enterprises has not uniform
satisfaction about incentives.
Table No. 7.72
Mean score satisfaction of Incentives
Annual Turnover N Mean Std. Deviation
25 to 50 lakh 21 37.5000 5.59017
Above 50 lakh 69 29.5290 14.05265
Below 25 lakh 10 40.0000 11.48671
Total 100 32.2500 13.07757
Table No. 7.73
ANOVA for Incentives satisfaction score
Sum of
Squares
df Mean
Square
F-
Calculation
F-
table
Significance
Between
Groups 1690.308 2 845.154 5.379 3.08
Significant
Within
Groups 15240.942 97 157.123
Total 16931.250 99
The table indicates that the calculated f-value (5.379) is much more than the table
value (3.08).
346
Table No. 7.74
Criticalvalues of turnover and fire safety satisfaction turn over and fire safety
satisfaction
Pair
s
Number
of Resp Mean SD
SE of
diff
of
Mean
Difference
of Mean
Calculated
T-value
Table
T-
value
Significance
1
25 to
50
lakh
21 37.50 5.59
2.11 7.971 3.77 1.68 Significant Above
50
lakh
69 29.53 14.05
2
25 to
50
lakh
21 37.50 5.59
4.03 -2.5 -0.62 1.7 Non-
significant Below
25
lakh
10 40.00 11.49
3
Above
50
lakh
69 29.53 14.05
4.19 -10.471 -2.50 1.68 Significant Below
25
lakh
10 40.00 11.49
Pair I- The number of respondents for above 50 lakh is more than number of
respondents for 25-50 lakhs category.
Pair II- The number of respondents for 25 to 50 lakhs is more than number of
respondents for below 25 lakhs category.
Pair III- The number of respondents for above 50 lakh is more than number of
respondents for below 25 lakhs category.
347
49. Null Hypothesis (Ho):- There is no association between level of satisfaction of
incentives and development of SME.
To test the null Hypothesis, collected information was classified and presented in the
table format given in the table:
Table No. : 7.75
Level of satisfaction of incentives and development of SME.
Level of satisfaction of consultancy Development of
SME
Total
Small Medium
Low 38 11 49
Medium 21 6 27
High 19 5 24
Total 78 22 100
The above data is presented in multiple bar diagram as follows
Fig No: 7.47
Level of satisfaction of incentives and development of SME
To test the above hypothesis Chi-square test is applied and the result of the test is
Chi-square calculated value: 0.997
Degree of freedom: 3
Chi-square table value (5% loss.) : 7.815
Result of test: Accepted.
348
Calculated value 0.997 is less than table value(7.815), therefore test is accepted and
null hypothesis is accepted that is:. There is no association between level of
satisfaction of incentives and development of SME.
Which indicate that respondents from small and medium enterprises has uniform
satisfaction about incentives.