chapter 5 evaluating arguments
TRANSCRIPT
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
1/25
Chapter 5: Reading and
Evaluating Arguments
Academic Reading
By Kathleen T. McWhorter
!th Edition"
Powerpoint by Gretchen Starks-Martin
St. Cloud State University, Minnesota
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
2/25
#earning $%&ectives:
To recogni'e the elements o( an argument
To recogni'e types o( arguments
To evaluate arguments
To recogni'e errors in logical reasoning
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
3/25
An argument presents logical reasons
and evidence to support a viewpoint
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
4/25
)arts o( an Argument
*++,E - pro%lem or controversy a%out
hich people disagree
C#A*M - the position on the issue
+,))$RT - reasons and evidence that
the claim is reasona%le and should %e
accepted RE/,TAT*$0 - opposing viepoints
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
5/25
Types o( Claims
C#A*M $/ /ACT - statement that can %e
proven or veri(ied %y o%servation or
research “Within ten years, destruction
of rain forests will cause
hundreds of plant and animalspecies to become extinct.”
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
6/25
Types o( Claims
C#A*M $/ 1A#,E - states that one thing
or idea is %etter or more desira%le than
another. “Requiring community service
in high school will produce more
community-aware graduates.”
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
7/25
Types o( Claims
C#A*M $/ )$#*C2 - suggests hat
should or ought to %e done to solve a
pro%lem. “o reduce school violence, more gun and
metal detectors should be installed in
public schools.”
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
8/25
Types o( +upport
REA+$0 - a general statement that
supports a claim.
E1*3E0CE - consists o( (acts4 statistics4eperiences4 comparisons4 and eamples
that sho hy the claim is valid.
EM$T*$0A# A))EA#+ - ideas that aretargeted toard needs or values that
readers are li6ely to care a%out.
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
9/25
*nductive and 3eductive Arguments
*03,CT*1E - reaches a general
conclusion (rom o%served speci(ics.
7By o%serving the per(ormance o( a largenum%er o( athletes4 you could conclude
that athletes possess physical stamina.8
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
10/25
*nductive and 3eductive Arguments
3E3,CT*1E - %egins ith a ma&or
premise and moves toard a more
speci(ic statement or minor premise.
7Athletes possess physical stamina.
Because Anthony is an athlete4 he must
possess physical stamina.8
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
11/25
+trategies (or Reading an Argument
What does the title suggest9 )revie Who is the author4 and hat are his or her
;uali(ications9
What is the date o( pu%lication9
What do * already 6no a%out the issue9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
12/25
+trategies (or Reading an Argument
Read once (or an initial impression. Read the argument several more times.
Annotate as you read.
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
13/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
Evaluate Types o( Evidence - *s it
su((icient to support the claim9
)ersonal Eperience - may %e %iased4 sodo not accept it
Eamples - should not %e used %y
themselves
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
14/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
+tatistics - can %e misused4 manipulated or
misinterpreted.
Comparisons and Analogies - relia%ilitydepends on ho closely they correspond to
the situation.
Relevancy and +u((iciency o( Evidence - isthere enough o( the right 6ind to support
the claim9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
15/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
3e(inition o( Terms - should %e care(ully
de(ined and used consistently
Cause-E((ect Relationships - evidence thatthe relationship eists should %e present
*mplied or +tated 1alue +ystem - are they
consistent ith your personal valuesystem9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
16/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
Recogni'ing and Re(uting $pposing
1iepoints
=uestion the accuracy4 relevancy orsu((iciency o( the opponent>s evidence.
3oes the author address opposing viepoints
clearly and (airly9 3oes the author re(ute the opposing viepoint
ith logic and relevant evidence9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
17/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
,n(air Emotional Appeals Emotionally Charged or Biased #anguage
/alse Authority athletes endorsing underear movie stars selling shampoo
Association a car %eing named a Cougar to remind you o( a
slee6 animal a cigarette advertisement (eaturing a scenic
ater(all
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
18/25
+trategies (or Evaluating Arguments
,n(air Emotional Appeals Appeal to 7Common /ol68
an ad shoing a product %eing used in an averagehousehold
a politician suggesting he is li6e everyone else
Ad
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
19/25
What emotional appeal is %eing used9
Come early so you on>t have to stand in line
%ecause everyone 6nos you can ma6e a deal
ith 3ave and save.
As a test pilot4 +usan i%%s 6nos per(ormance.
7That>s hy * drive a Mustang48 she says.
$lson>s pi''as are loer in (at and calories.
$ther pi''a ma6ers don>t care a%out your health.
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
20/25
Emotional appeals continued
7We can or6 magic ith your children48 saysEileen o( Eileen>s 3ay Care. 7Call upon us4 andyour children ill %e happy you did.8
#i%erty Bell Airlines (lies anyhere in this greatland4 (rom sea to shining sea.
As a young man4 Candidate Alan Wilson learnedhat it means to or6 hard %y spending longhours li(ting %oes and seeping (loors or6ing ina department store.
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
21/25
Errors in #ogical Reasoningcommonly called logical (allacies
invalidate the argument or render argument (laed
Circular Reasoning?Begging the =uestion 7/emale police o((icers should not %e sent to
crime scenes %ecause apprehending criminals isa man>s &o%.8
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
22/25
Errors in #ogical Reasoning
0on +e;uitur 7*t 3oes 0ot /ollo8" 7Because my doctor is young4 *>m sure she>ll
%e a good doctor.8
/alse Cause 7Because * opened the um%rella hen * tripped on
the sideal64 the um%rella must have caused me totrip.8
Either-$r /allacy 7Because o( the violence4 T1 must %e either alloed
or %anned.8
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
23/25
/or Each Argument:
*denti(y the claim. $utline the reasons to support the claim.
What types o( evidence are used9 Evaluate the ade;uacy and su((iciency o(
the evidence.
What emotional appeals are used9 3oes the author recogni'e or re(ute
counter arguments9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
24/25
Comparing the Arguments:
Compare the types o( evidence used.
Which argument did you (ind more
convincing9 Why9 What (urther in(ormation ould %e use(ul
in assessing the issue9
-
8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments
25/25
Read the articles on education and
complete the activities (olloing each
selection.7+chool Boards 3oing #ittle to
Close ap Beteen Whites4
Minorities87+chool 1ouchers: The Wrong
Choice (or )u%lic Education8