chapter 5 evaluating arguments

Upload: hector-garcia

Post on 05-Jul-2018

228 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    1/25

     

    Chapter 5: Reading and

    Evaluating Arguments

     Academic Reading

    By Kathleen T. McWhorter 

    !th Edition"

    Powerpoint by Gretchen Starks-Martin

    St. Cloud State University, Minnesota

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    2/25

     

    #earning $%&ectives:

    To recogni'e the elements o( an argument

    To recogni'e types o( arguments

    To evaluate arguments

    To recogni'e errors in logical reasoning

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    3/25

     

    An argument presents logical reasons

    and evidence to support a viewpoint

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    4/25

     

    )arts o( an Argument

    *++,E - pro%lem or controversy a%out

    hich people disagree

    C#A*M - the position on the issue

    +,))$RT - reasons and evidence that

    the claim is reasona%le and should %e

    accepted RE/,TAT*$0 - opposing viepoints

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    5/25

     

    Types o( Claims

    C#A*M $/ /ACT - statement that can %e

    proven or veri(ied %y o%servation or

    research “Within ten years, destruction

    of rain forests will cause

    hundreds of plant and animalspecies to become extinct.” 

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    6/25

     

    Types o( Claims

    C#A*M $/ 1A#,E - states that one thing

    or idea is %etter or more desira%le than

    another. “Requiring community service

    in high school will produce more

    community-aware graduates.” 

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    7/25 

    Types o( Claims

    C#A*M $/ )$#*C2 - suggests hat

    should or ought to %e done to solve a

    pro%lem. “o reduce school violence, more gun and

    metal detectors should be installed in

     public schools.” 

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    8/25 

    Types o( +upport

    REA+$0 - a general statement that

    supports a claim.

    E1*3E0CE - consists o( (acts4 statistics4eperiences4 comparisons4 and eamples

    that sho hy the claim is valid.

    EM$T*$0A# A))EA#+ - ideas that aretargeted toard needs or values that

    readers are li6ely to care a%out.

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    9/25 

    *nductive and 3eductive Arguments

    *03,CT*1E - reaches a general

    conclusion (rom o%served speci(ics.

    7By o%serving the per(ormance o( a largenum%er o( athletes4 you could conclude

    that athletes possess physical stamina.8

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    10/25 

    *nductive and 3eductive Arguments

    3E3,CT*1E - %egins ith a ma&or

    premise and moves toard a more

    speci(ic statement or minor premise.

    7Athletes possess physical stamina.

    Because Anthony is an athlete4 he must

    possess physical stamina.8

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    11/25 

    +trategies (or Reading an Argument

    What does the title suggest9 )revie Who is the author4 and hat are his or her

    ;uali(ications9

    What is the date o( pu%lication9

    What do * already 6no a%out the issue9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    12/25 

    +trategies (or Reading an Argument

    Read once (or an initial impression. Read the argument several more times.

     Annotate as you read.

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    13/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    Evaluate Types o( Evidence - *s it

    su((icient to support the claim9

    )ersonal Eperience - may %e %iased4 sodo not accept it

    Eamples - should not %e used %y

    themselves

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    14/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    +tatistics - can %e misused4 manipulated or

    misinterpreted.

    Comparisons and Analogies - relia%ilitydepends on ho closely they correspond to

    the situation.

    Relevancy and +u((iciency o( Evidence - isthere enough o( the right 6ind to support

    the claim9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    15/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    3e(inition o( Terms - should %e care(ully

    de(ined and used consistently

    Cause-E((ect Relationships - evidence thatthe relationship eists should %e present

    *mplied or +tated 1alue +ystem - are they

    consistent ith your personal valuesystem9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    16/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    Recogni'ing and Re(uting $pposing

    1iepoints

    =uestion the accuracy4 relevancy orsu((iciency o( the opponent>s evidence.

    3oes the author address opposing viepoints

    clearly and (airly9 3oes the author re(ute the opposing viepoint

    ith logic and relevant evidence9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    17/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    ,n(air Emotional Appeals Emotionally Charged or Biased #anguage

    /alse Authority athletes endorsing underear  movie stars selling shampoo

     Association a car %eing named a Cougar to remind you o( a

    slee6 animal a cigarette advertisement (eaturing a scenic

    ater(all

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    18/25

     

    +trategies (or Evaluating Arguments

    ,n(air Emotional Appeals Appeal to 7Common /ol68

    an ad shoing a product %eing used in an averagehousehold

    a politician suggesting he is li6e everyone else

     Ad

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    19/25

     

    What emotional appeal is %eing used9

    Come early so you on>t have to stand in line

    %ecause everyone 6nos you can ma6e a deal

    ith 3ave and save.

     As a test pilot4 +usan i%%s 6nos per(ormance.

    7That>s hy * drive a Mustang48 she says.

    $lson>s pi''as are loer in (at and calories.

    $ther pi''a ma6ers don>t care a%out your health.

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    20/25

     

    Emotional appeals continued

    7We can or6 magic ith your children48 saysEileen o( Eileen>s 3ay Care. 7Call upon us4 andyour children ill %e happy you did.8

    #i%erty Bell Airlines (lies anyhere in this greatland4 (rom sea to shining sea.

     As a young man4 Candidate Alan Wilson learnedhat it means to or6 hard %y spending longhours li(ting %oes and seeping (loors or6ing ina department store.

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    21/25

     

    Errors in #ogical Reasoningcommonly called logical (allacies

    invalidate the argument or render argument (laed

    Circular Reasoning?Begging the =uestion 7/emale police o((icers should not %e sent to

    crime scenes %ecause apprehending criminals isa man>s &o%.8

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    22/25

     

    Errors in #ogical Reasoning

    0on +e;uitur 7*t 3oes 0ot /ollo8" 7Because my doctor is young4 *>m sure she>ll

    %e a good doctor.8

    /alse Cause 7Because * opened the um%rella hen * tripped on

    the sideal64 the um%rella must have caused me totrip.8

    Either-$r /allacy 7Because o( the violence4 T1 must %e either alloed

    or %anned.8

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    23/25

     

    /or Each Argument:

    *denti(y the claim. $utline the reasons to support the claim.

    What types o( evidence are used9 Evaluate the ade;uacy and su((iciency o(

    the evidence.

    What emotional appeals are used9 3oes the author recogni'e or re(ute

    counter arguments9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    24/25

     

    Comparing the Arguments:

    Compare the types o( evidence used.

    Which argument did you (ind more

    convincing9 Why9 What (urther in(ormation ould %e use(ul

    in assessing the issue9

  • 8/16/2019 Chapter 5 Evaluating Arguments

    25/25

    Read the articles on education and

    complete the activities (olloing each

    selection.7+chool Boards 3oing #ittle to

    Close ap Beteen Whites4

    Minorities87+chool 1ouchers: The Wrong

    Choice (or )u%lic Education8