chapter 56 fall 2008faculty.weber.edu/rokazaki/zoology1110/chapter 56 fall... · 2008. 12. 5. ·...
TRANSCRIPT
-
1
1
Community Ecology
Chapter 56
2
Biological Communities
• Community: all organisms living together in a specific place– Evolve together– Forage together– Compete– Cooperate
-
2
3
• Communities: characterized either by their constituent species or by their properties– Species richness: # of species present– Primary productivity: amount of energy
produced• Interactions among members govern many
ecological & evolutionary processes
Biological Communities
4
• Community interactions– Predation
large predator consuming sequentially smaller prey
– Symbiosis: an intimate relationship between two speciesCommensalismMutualismParasitism
• Assemblage: species included only a portion of those present in community
Biological Communities
-
3
5
• Two views of structure & functioning of communities– Individualistic concept: H.A. Gleason
community: nothing more than an aggregation of species that happen to occur together at one place
– Holistic concept: F.E. Clements community: an integrated unit; superorganism-more than sum of its parts
Biological Communities
6
Biological Communities
In communities, species respond independently to changing environmental conditions
• Community composition changes gradually across landscapes
Most ecologists today favor individualistic concept
-
4
7
Biological Communities• Abundance of tree
species along a moisture gradient in Santa Catalina Mts of Southeastern Arizona
• Each line represents abundance of a different tree species
• Community composition changes continually along gradient
8
Biological Communities
• Sometimes abundance of species in a community does change geographically in a synchronous pattern
• Ecotones: places where environment changes abruptly
-
5
9
Ecological Niche
• Niche*: total of all ways an organism uses resources of its environment– Space utilization– Food consumption– Temperature range– Appropriate conditions for mating– Requirements for moisture & more
Billock
*address & occupation of an organism
10
Ecological Niche
• Interspecific competition: occurs when two species attempt to use same resource & there is not enough resource to satisfy both
• Interference competition: physical interactions over access to resources– Fighting– Defending a territory– Competitive exclusion: displacing an
individual from its range
-
6
11
Ecological Niche
• Fundamental niche: entire niche that a species is capable of using, based on physiological tolerance limits & resource needs
• Realized niche: actual set of environmental conditions, presence or absence of other species, in which species can establish a stable population
12
Ecological Niche
J.H. Connell’s classical study of barnacles
-
7
13
Ecological Niche
• Other causes of niche restriction– Predator absence or
presence• Plant species
– Absence of pollinators– Presence of herbivores
Billock
Billock
14
Ecological Niche
• G.F. Gause’s classic experiment on competitive exclusion using three Paramecium species shows this principle in action
Principle of competitive exclusion: if two species are competing for a limited resource, the species that uses resource more efficiently will eventually eliminate the other locally
-
8
15
16
Ecological Niche
• Niche overlap & coexistence• Competitive exclusion redefined: no
two species can occupy same niche indefinitely when resources are limiting
• Species may divide up resources àcalled resource partitioning
• Gause: found this occurring with two Paramecium species
-
9
17
Resource partitioning
among sympatric
lizard species
18
Ecological Niche
• Resource partitioning often seen in similar species that occupy same geographic area
• Thought to result from the process of natural selection
• Character displacement: differences in morphology evident between sympatric species– May play a role in adaptive radiation
-
10
19
Ecological Niche
Character displacement in Darwin’s finches
20
Ecological Niche
• Detection of interspecific competition can be difficult– If resources not limited there may be no
competition– Small vs. large population size– May be environmental conditions that cause
decline of a species, not competition
-
11
21
Ecological Niche
• Experimental studies of competition• Seed-eating rodents & Kangaroo rats
– 50m x 50m enclosures– Enclosures had openings large
enough for seed-eating rodents but not the Kangaroo rats
– Monitor # of small rodents
22
Ecological Niche
Detecting interspecific competition
-
12
23
Ecological Niche
• Interpreting field data: Negative effects of one species on another do not automatically indicate the existence of competition– Adults may prey on juveniles of other
species– Presence of one species may attract
predators that prey on both species• Experimental studies are not always feasible
24
Predator-Prey
• Predation: consuming of one organism by another
• Predation strongly influences prey populations• Prey populations can have explosions &
crashes– White-tail deer in Eastern US– Introduction of rats, dogs, cats on islands– New Zealand: Stephen Island wren extinct
because of a single cat
-
13
25
Predator-PreyPredator-prey in microscopic worldWhen prey (Paramecium) used up in test tube,
predator (Didinium) also dies
26
Predator-Prey
• Introduction of prickly-pear cactus in Australia – Cactus population exploded– Introduced predator a moth (caterpillar eats
the cactus) & population came under control
-
14
27
Predator-Prey
• Predation & coevolution– Predation provides strong selective
pressure on prey population– Features that decrease probability of
capture strongly favored– Predator populations counteradapt to
continue eating prey– Coevolution race may ensue
28
Predator-Prey
• Plants adapt to predation (herbivory) by evolving mechanisms to defend themselves– Chemical defenses: secondary compounds
• Oils, chemicals to attract predators to eat herbivores, poison milky sap & others
– Herbivores coevolve to continue eating plants
-
15
29
Predator-Prey
Insect herbivores well suited to their plant hosts: cabbage butterfly
30
Predator-Prey
• Chemical defenses in animals– Monarch butterfly caterpillars feed on
milkweed & dogbane families– Monarchs incorporate cardiac glycosides
from plants for protection from predation– Butterflies eaten by birds, but Monarch
contains chemical from milkweed that make birds sick
-
16
31
Predator-Prey
Blue Jay learns not to eat Monarch butterflies
32
Predator-Prey
Poison-dart frogs of the family Dendrobatidae produce toxic alkaloids in mucus that covers their brightly colored skin
-
17
33
Predator-Prey
• Defensive coloration– Poisonous insects & other animals use
warning coloration = aposematism– Organisms lacking specific chemical
defenses seldom brightly colored– Camouflage or cryptic coloration help
nonpoisonous animals blend with their surroundings
– Camouflaged animals do not usually live together in groups
34
Predator-Prey
Inchworm caterpillar closely resembles a twig
-
18
35
Predator-Prey
• Mimicry allows one species to capitalize on defensive strategies of another– Resemble distasteful species that
exhibit warning coloration– Mimic gains an advantage by looking
like distasteful model– Batesian mimicry– Müllerian mimicry
36
Predator-Prey
• Batesian mimicry– Named for Henry Bates– Discovered palatable insects that
resembled brightly colored, distasteful species
– Mimics would be avoided by predators because they looked like distasteful species
– Feed on plants with toxic chemicals
-
19
37
Predator-Prey
38
Predator-Prey• Müllerian mimicry
– Fritz Müller– Discovered that several unrelated but
poisonous species come to resemble one another
– Predator learns quickly to avoid them– Some predators evolve an innate
avoidance • Both mimic types must look and act like
dangerous model
-
20
39
Predator-Prey
40
Species Interactions
• Symbiosis: two or more kinds of organisms interact in more-or-less intimate permanent relationships
• All symbiotic relationships carry potential for coevolution
• Three major symbiotic types:Symbiont Host
– Commensalism + o– Mutualism + +– Parasitism + -
-
21
41
Species Interactions• Commensalism:
benefits one species & neutral to other– Spanish moss: an epiphyte hangs from trees
42
Species Interactions
• Commensalism may not be commensalism• Oxpickers & grazing animals
– Oxpickers eat parasites off of grazers– Sometimes pick scabs & drink blood– Grazers could be unharmed by insects
oxpickers eat
-
22
43
Species Interactions• Oxpickers on an impala• Is it commensalism, parasitism or mutualism ?
44
Species Interactions• Mutualism benefits both species• Coevolution: flowering plants & insects
Ants & acacias– Acacias provide hollow thorns & food– Ants provide protection from herbivores
-
23
45
Species Interactions
• Not all ant & acacia relationships mutualistic• In Kenya, several ant spp. live on acacias
– One sp. clips acacia branches to prevent other ants from living in tree
– Clipping branches sterilizes tree– A parasitic relationship
46
Species Interactions
• Parasitism benefits one species at expense of another
• External parasites: – Ectoparasites: feed on exterior surface of
an organism– Parasitoids: insects that lay eggs on living
hosts• Wasp, whose larvae feed on host body,
killing it
-
24
47
Species Interactions
External parasite: yellow vines flowering plant dodder, it is a parasite obtainings its food from host plant it grows on
48
Species Interactions
• Internal parasites– Endoparasites: live inside host– Extreme specialization by parasite as
to which host it invades– Structure of parasite may be
simplified because of where it lives in its host
– Many parasites have complex life cycles involving more than one host
-
25
49
Species Interactions
• Dicrocoelium dendriticum: flatworm living in ants as an intermediate host with cattle as its definitive host
• To go from ant to a cow it changes ant behavior • Causing ant to climb to top of a blade of grass
to be eaten with grass
50
Species Interactions
• Ecological processes à interactive effects– Predation reduces competition
• Predators choice depends partly on relative abundance of prey options
• Superior competitors may be reduced in # by predation
• Allows other species to survive when they could have been out competed
-
26
51
Species Interactions
Starfish eat barnacles, allowing other species to thrive instead of being crowded out by the explosive population of barnacles
52
Species Interactions
• Parasitism may counter competition– Parasites may affect sympatric species
differently, changing the outcome of interspecific interactions
– Flour beetles & a competition experiment• Without parasite T. castaneum dominant• With parasite: T. confusum dominant
-
27
53
Species Interactions
• Indirect effects: presence of one species may affect a second by way of interactions with a third species
54
• Keystone species: absence or extreme abundance of a species alters dramatically composition of communities
• Sea star predation on barnacles greatly alters species richness of marine community
• Keystone species can manipulate environment in ways that create new habitats for other species
Species Interactions
-
28
55
Species Interactions
Beavers construct dams & transform flowing streams into ponds, creating new habitats for many plants & animals
56
Succession & DisturbancePrimary succession:
occurs on bare, lifeless substrate- Open water- Rocks- Organisms gradually move into an area &
change its nature
-
29
57
Succession & Disturbance
Primary succession on glacial moraines
58
Succession & Disturbance
• Secondary succession: occurs in areas where an existing community disturbed but organisms still remain– Example: field left uncultivated– Forest after a fire
• Succession happens because species alter habitat & resources available in ways that favor other species entering habitat
-
30
59
Succession & Disturbance
• Three dynamic concepts in process– Tolerance: early successional species
characterized by r-selected species tolerant of harsh conditions
– Facilitation: early successional species introduce local changes in habitatK-selected species replace r-selected species
– Inhibition: changes in habitat caused by one species inhibits growth of original species
60
Succession & Disturbance
• Animal species in a community can also change over time
• Krakatau island– Volcanic eruption– Fauna changed in synchrony with
vegetation– Changes in animals affect plant
occurrences; pollination, animal dispersion
-
31
61
Succession & Disturbance
Succession after a volcanic eruption
62
• Communities: constantly changing as a result of– Climatic changes– Species invasions– Disturbance events
• Nonequilibrium models emphasize change rather than stability used to study communities & ecosystems
Succession & Disturbance
-
32
63
Succession & Disturbance
• Intermediate disturbance hypothesis:communities experiencing moderate amounts of disturbance have higher levels of species richness than communities experiencing either little or great amounts of disturbance
Disturbance
Co
mm
un
ity
Str
uc
ture
(D
ive
rsit
y)
High
HighLow
Low
Med
64
–Patches of habitat exist at different successional stages
–May prevent communities from reaching final stages of succession
Succession & Disturbance
Intermediate disturbance hypothesis:
-
33
65
Succession & Disturbance
• Disturbance common, rather than exceptional in many communities
• Understanding role disturbances play in structuring communities an important area of ecology