chapter 5.ppt

20
© 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved. Personality and Values Chapter FIVE

Upload: simantopreeom

Post on 08-Sep-2015

235 views

Category:

Documents


6 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Personality and

    Values

    Chapter FIVE

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 4*

    What is Personality?

    4*

    Personality Determinants

    GeneticsEnvironmentSituation
  • The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator

    Most widely-used instrument in the world.Participants are classified on four axes to determine one of 16 possible personality types, such as ENTJ.

    Extroverted (E) vs. Introverted (I)

    Sensing (S) vs. Intuitive (N)

    Thinking (T) vs. Feeling (F)

    Judging (J) vs. Perceiving (P)

    4-*

  • The Types and Their Uses

    Each of the sixteen possible combinations has a name, for instance:

    Visionaries (INTJ) are original, stubborn and driven.

    Organizers (ESTJ) realistic, logical, analytical and businesslike.

    Conceptualizer (ENTP) entrepreneurial, innovative, individualistic and resourceful.

    Research results on validity mixed.

    MBTI is a good tool for self-awareness and counseling.

    Should not be used as a selection test for job candidates.

    4-*

  • The Big Five Model of Personality Dimensions

    Extroversion

    Sociable, gregarious, and assertive

    Agreeableness

    Good-natured, cooperative, and trusting

    Conscientiousness

    Responsible, dependable, persistent, and organized

    Emotional Stability

    Calm, self-confident, secure under stress (positive), versus nervous, depressed, and insecure under stress (negative)

    Openness to Experience

    Curious, imaginative, artistic, and sensitive

    4-*

  • Other Personality Traits Relevant to OB

    Core Self Evaluation

    Bottom line conclusions individuals have about their capabilities, competence and worth as a person

    Machiavellianism

    The degree to which an individual is pragmatic, maintains emotional distance, and believes that ends can justify means

    Narcissism

    The tendency to be arrogant, have a grandiose sense of self-importance, require excessive admiration, and have a sense of entitlement

    Self Monitoring

    Individuals ability to adjust his or her behavior to external, situational factors

    Proactive Personality

    People who identify opportunities, show initiative, take action, and preserve until meaningful changes occurs

    4-*

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Definition: Mode of conduct or end state is personally or socially preferable (i.e., what is right & good)

    Terminal Values

    Desirable End States

    Instrumental Values

    The ways/means for achieving ones terminal values

    Value System: A hierarchy based on a ranking of an individuals values in terms of their intensity.

    Note: Values Vary by followers

    Values

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Importance of Values

    Provide understanding of the attitudes, motivation, and behaviors of individuals and cultures.Influence our perception of the world around us.Represent interpretations of right and wrong.Imply that some behaviors or outcomes are preferred over others.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Types of Values - Rokeach Value Survey

    Terminal Values

    Desirable end-states of existence; the goals that a person would like to achieve during his or her lifetime.

    Instrumental Values

    Preferable modes of behavior or means of achieving ones terminal values.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Values in the Rokeach
    Survey

    E X H I B I T 4-3

    Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Values in the Rokeach Survey
    (contd)

    E X H I B I T 4-3 (contd)

    Source: M. Rokeach, The Nature of Human Values (New York: The Free Press, 1973).

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Mean Value Rankings of Executives, Union Members, and Activists

    E X H I B I T 4-4

    Source: Based on W. C. Frederick and J. Weber, The Values of Corporate Managers and Their Critics: An Empirical Description and Normative Implications, in W. C. Frederick and L. E. Preston (eds.) Business Ethics: Research Issues and Empirical Studies (Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 1990), pp. 12344.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • Personality Job Fit Theory

    A theory that identifies six personality types and proposes that the fit between personality type and occupational environmental determines satisfaction and turnover

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Power DistanceIndividualism vs. CollectivismMasculinity vs. FemininityUncertainty AvoidanceLong-term and Short-term orientation

    Values across Cultures: Hofstedes Framework

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hofstedes Framework for Assessing Cultures

    Power Distance

    The extent to which a society accepts that power in institutions and organizations is distributed unequally.

    Low distance: relatively equal power between those with status/wealth and those without status/wealth

    High distance: extremely unequal power distribution between those with status/wealth and those without status/wealth

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hofstedes Framework (contd)

    Collectivism

    A tight social framework in which people expect others in groups of which they are a part to look after them and protect them.

    Individualism

    The degree to which people prefer to act as individuals rather than a member of groups.

    Vs.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hofstedes Framework (contd)

    Masculinity

    The extent to which the society values work roles of achievement, power, and control, and where assertiveness and materialism are also valued.

    Femininity

    The extent to which there is little differentiation between roles for men and women.

    Vs.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hofstedes Framework (contd)

    Uncertainty Avoidance

    The extent to which a society feels threatened by uncertain and ambiguous situations and tries to avoid them.

    High Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not like ambiguous situations & tries to avoid them. Low Uncertainty Avoidance: Society does not mind ambiguous situations & embraces them.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *

  • 2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    Hofstedes Framework (contd)

    Long-term Orientation

    A national culture attribute that emphasizes the future, economy, and persistence.

    Short-term Orientation

    A national culture attribute that emphasizes the present and the here and now.

    Vs.

    2007 Prentice Hall Inc. All rights reserved.

    *