chapter 9 alternatives (technology & site) · connected lo ad of the energy is about 492 kwh ....

24
M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________ CHAPTER 9 ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE) [9-1] p 9.1 ALTERNATIVES During the scoping period, no necessity for the alternative analysis of the technology was observed as the technology/process mentioned for manufacturing of the proposed product are best suitable. Moreover the unit is already running production of the existing product has enough space for expansion so the proposed site is best suitable for the manufacturing of the proposed product.

Upload: phamhuong

Post on 19-Mar-2019

214 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011________

CHAPTER 9 ALTERNATIVES (TECHNOLOGY & SITE)

[9-1]

p

9.1 ALTERNATIVES

During the scoping period, no necessity for the alternative analysis of the technology was observed as

the technology/process mentioned for manufacturing of the proposed product are best suitable.

Moreover the unit is already running production of the existing product has enough space for expansion

so the proposed site is best suitable for the manufacturing of the proposed product.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011_ ____

CHAPTER 10 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT

[10-1]

10.1 ENVIRONMENTAL COST BENEFIT

During the study period it was revealed that the environmental cost benefit can’t be recommended at the

scoping stage.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-1]

11.1 INTRODUCTION & PROJECT JUSTIFICATION

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. is a private limited company formed in 1986. The

promoters are highly qualified and have global experience. M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt.

Ltd. is one of the renowned fertilizers trading and manufacturing Organizations.

The unit is located at S. No: 378/379, N.H. No. 8, Village-Khadsupa, Taluka-Navsari,

District-Navsari of Gujarat State, where expansion will be carried out.

M/s. T. J. Agro fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. has started production of NPK fertilizers at Navsari in

1996 and in 2003, it has started manufacturing Single Super phosphate fertilizer. The

company has created good demand for its products in the market due to improved quality

and market strategy. Hence after assessing the requirement of NPK & Single Super

Phosphate fertilizers in future, company has decided to expand its production capacity to

cater the market demand.

For expansion of existing production capacity, company has applied for the Environmental

Clearance of the project under the latest Notification for EC. Form 1 was submitted to the

State Level Expert Appraisal Committee on dated 03.06.2010.

First Presentation for the Terms of Reference was conducted on the 28.09.2010 following

which the terms of reference were issued to us.

This report has been prepared based on the Terms of Reference vide the letter Project No.

EIA-10-2010-699-E, 63216 Dated: 16.11.2010 issued to us by the SEAC committee. The

Total Investment for the proposed project will be 1.0 Crore.

11.2 PURPOSE OF STUDY

Environmental Impact Assessment Report & Environmental Management Plan have been

prepared for obtaining Environmental Clearance for T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. for the

proposed project for expansion of existing Products- NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers,

Single Super Phosphate Powder & Single Super Phosphate Granulated &

Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product).

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-2]

11.3 EXTENT OF STUDY AND AREA COVERED

The baseline status of environmental quality in the vicinity of project site serves as the basis

for identification, prediction and evaluation of impacts. The baseline environmental quality

is assessed through field studies within the impact zone for various components of the

environment, viz. air, noise, water, land and socio-economic. The baseline environmental

quality has been assessed in the winter season (December 2010 – February 2011) in a study

area of 10 km radial distance from the project site.

11.4 METHOD OF STUDY

The study is based on guidelines of MoEF and identifies the nature of activities involved

and their impacts caused on various environmental parameters. It subsequently suggests

mitigation measures to be executed for safeguarding against any environmental degradation.

Finally, it suggests methods of implementing the environmental management plan.

11.5 PROJECT DETAILS

The product proposed to be manufactured along with their capacities is shown in following

Table 11.1.

TABLE 11.1 PROPOSED PRODUCT LIST

Sr.

No. Name of Product

Existing

Quantity

(MT/Month)

Proposed

Quantity

(MT/Month)

Total

Quantity

(MT/Month)

1. NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers 1000 1000 2000

2. Single Super Phosphate Powder 2000 1000 3000

3. Single Super Phosphate

Granulated

1000 1000 2000

4. Fluorosilisilic Acid (by product)

Total : 68 Total : 34 Total : 102

Reuse : 44 Reuse : 22 Reuse : 66

Sell : 24 Sell : 12 Sell : 36

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-3]

The Raw material proposed to be used along with their consumptions is shown in following

Table 11.2.

TABLE 11.2 PROPOSED RAW MATERIAL LIST

Sr.

No. Name of Raw Material

Existing

Quantity

(MT/Month)

Proposed

Quantity

(MT/Month)

Total

Quantity

(MT/Month)

(A) NPK Granulated Mixed Fertilizers

1. Urea 460 460 920

2. DAP 60 60 120

3. SSP (Single Super Phosphate) 80 80 160

4. MOP (Potash) 271 271 542

5. Filler 300 300 600

(B) Single Super Phosphate Powder

6. Fluorosilisilic Acid 44 22 66

7. Rock phosphate 1200 600 1800

8. Diluted sulphuric acid (70%) 1000 500 1500

(C) Single Super Phosphate Granulated

9. Single Super Phosphate Powder 1000 1000 2000

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-4]

11.6 ENVIRONMENTAL SETTING

11.6.1 Landuse of the study area:

Land use within 10 km radius of the study area is determined with the help of satellite image.

Land use of study area can broadly be classified in to categories such as habitation, habitation

with dense vegetation, water body, vegetation, land with shrub, land without shrub, industrial

area, sandy area and agricultural land etc.

11.6.2 Climate of the Study Area:

The general agro-climatic zone of the study area is Semi- arid.

11.6.3 Wind:

The predominant wind direction during the study period is observed to be from NW

direction.

11.6.4 Rainfall:

The average annual rainfall is 1220-1782 mm and rainy day varies within 1 to 23.

11.6.5 Cloud Cover:

The area remains cloudy between June-Septembers, which are the active period of the

monsoon season.

11.6.6 Humidity:

Most humid conditions are found in the monsoon, followed by post monsoon, winter and

summer in the order. Mornings are more humid than evenings and humidity ranges from a

high of 75-100% in monsoon mornings to a low of 5-61% in summer evenings. During post

monsoon season, in morning humidity remains between 61-99 % and in the evening it

remains between 19-82 %.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-5]

11.7 FUEL/ENERGY REQUIREMENTS

The main sources of power of M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. will be utilized energy

from existing provider M/s. Dakshin Gujarat Vij Company Limited. The total existing

connected load of the energy is about 492 KWH.

Additional 75 KWH will require for expansion project which would be applied to

DGVCL as & when required.

Fuel for Hot air Generator 1 & 2 : Bio Coal @ 5 MT/day (Proposed)

Fuel for Proposed Stand By D. G. Set (Capacity: 125 KVA): HSD – 15 Lit/hr

11.8 WATER REQUIREMENT

Total Water Requirement : 10.0 KL/day

Source: Borewell

Wastewater Generation : Domestic: 2.5 KL/day

Industrial: Nil

TABLE 11.3 (A) TOTAL WATER REQUIREMENTS FOR THE PROJECT:

Categories Existing

(KL/day)

Proposed

(KL/day)

Total

(KL/day)

(A) Domestic 2.5 2.5 5.0

(B) Industrial

(i) Process 2.0 2.0 4.0

(ii) Utility

(For scrubber )

0.5 0.5 1.0

(iii) Washing -- -- --

Total (B) 2.5 2.5 5.0

Total (A+B) 5.0 5.0 10.0

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-6]

TABLE 11.3 (B) TOTAL WASTEWATER GENERATIONS FOR THE PROJECT:

Categories Existing

(KL/day)

Proposed

(KL/day)

Total

(KL/day)

(A) Domestic 1.0 1.5 2.5

(B) Industrial

(i) Process Nil Nil Nil

(ii) Utility -- -- --

(iii) Washing -- -- --

Total (B) Nil Nil Nil

Total (A+B) 1.0 1.5 2.5

11.9 BASELINE ENVIRONMENT

Has been displayed in Chapter No. 3 of the EIA Report

11.10 ENVIRONMENT IMPACTS & MITIGATION MEASURES

Has been displayed in Chapter No. 4 of the EIA Report

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-7]

11.11 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMME

TABLE 11.4 ENVIRONMENTAL MONITORING PROGRAMS

Sr.

No. Activity Schedule

Air Pollution Monitoring

1. Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by

GPCB in their air consent from time to time within

the T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. premises

Once every Quarter

2. Ambient air monitoring of parameters specified by

GPCB in their air consents from time to time at

four stations outside T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd.

premises

Once every season at

each station

Flue Gas Emission Monitoring

3. Stack monitoring of prescribed parameters as

given in air consent from time to time

Once every month

Ground Water Monitoring

4. Sampling & Analysis of the ground water of bore

well within premises will be done.

Once in Six months

Solid Waste Generation Monitoring / Record Keeping

5. Records of generation of used liner, bags and

records of their dispatch to suppliers for refilling

Daily To be comply as

per Haz. Waste [MPH]

rules, 2003

6. Records of generation of waste oils and their

treatment

Daily

7. Records of generation, handling, storage,

transportation and disposal of other solid, aqueous

and organic hazardous wastes as required by

hazardous waste authorization

To be updated daily

Environmental Audit & Annual return

8. Environmental statement under the EP (Act) 1986

& annual return of hazardous waste generation,

handling & disposal.

Once in a year

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-8]

,

11.12 AMBIENT AIR

The source of Flue gas Emission is from Hot air Generator. For Hot air Generator Bio Coal

will be used as fuel.

Flue gas will be released through stack of 11 m height. The Hot air Generator will be

provided with Dual Cyclone Dust separator & Proposed Bag Filter in series.

Another Source is Den & Mixer exhaust gas which will be provided with Ventury Water

Scrubber followed by rock phosphate absorption tank to scrub H2SiF6 gas. Hence, it can be

concluded that the production activities will not adversely impact the ambient air quality.

TABLE 11.5 (A) PROPOSED DETAILS OF STACK, APCS & ITS EMISSION

ESTIMATE

Stack Attached To

Height &

Top Dia.

of Stack

Type of Fuel

& Qty.

Air Pollution Control

System Final

Concentration

Existing

Proposed

Existing Proposed

Hot Air Generator

1 & 2

11 meter

&

500 mm

L.D.O.

40 Lit/hr

Bio Coal

5 MT/day

Dual

Cyclone

Separator

Bag Filter

PM < 150 mg/NM3

SO2 < 100 ppm

NOx < 50 ppm

D. G. Set (Stand By)

(Capacity: 125 KVA)

8 meter Nil HSD

15 Lit/hr

Not Applicable PM < 150 mg/NM3

SO2 < 100 ppm

NOx < 50 ppm

TABLE 11.5 (B) PROPOSED EMISSION RATE

Sr.

No. Stack Attached to Parameter

Emission Estimate in Kg/hr

Existing Proposed After

Expansion

1. Hot Air Generator

1 & 2

PM 0.175 0.075 0.075

SOx 0.1 0.05 0.05

NOx 0.063 0.025 0.025

NOTE: AFTER EXPANSION, LDO FUEL WILL BE TOTALLY REPLACED BY

BIOCOAL. Thus, existing Air pollutant level released from stack will also be

reduced after expansion.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-9]

TABLE 11.5 (C) PROPOSED DETAILS OF PROCESS VENT, APCS & ITS

EMISSION ESTIMATE

Process Vent

Attached To

Height & Top

Dia.

of Stack

Air Pollution

Control System Final Concentration

Den & Mixture 35 Meter

&

600 mm

Ventury Water

Scrubber

SPM < 150 mg/NM3

SO2 < 40 mg/NM3

NOx < 25 mg/NM3

Fluorine < 0.5 mg/NM3

TABLE 11.5 (D) PROPOSED EMISSION RATE

Sr.

No. Stack Attached to Parameter

Emission Estimate in Kg/hr

Existing Proposed Total

1. Den & Mixture

(Process Vent)

(Flow: 2500 M3/Hr.)

PM 0.13 0.065 0.195

SOx Nil Nil Nil

NOx 0.005 0.0025 0.0075

HF 0.001 0.0005 0.0015

Fluorine

Gas

0.001 0.0005 0.0015

The ambient air quality monitoring was carried out in accordance with guidelines of Central

Pollution Control Board (CPCB) of June 1998 and National Ambient Air Quality Standards

(NAAQS) of CPCB of November 2009. Ambient Air Quality Monitoring (AAQM) was

carried out at five locations during winter season. The maximum numbers of sampling

locations were selected close to the project site and in the study area of 10 km radial

distance around the plant site. The monitoring was carried out 24 hours a day twice a week

per location in the study area except the project site, where continuous monitoring was

carried out. Twenty four numbers of observations were taken at each monitoring location

except the project site.

The conventional and project specific parameters such as PM10, PM2.5, SO2, Nox, HF were

monitored at site.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-

2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-10]

The values for mentioned concentrations of various pollutants at all the monitoring locations

were processed for different statistical parameters like arithmetic mean, minimum

concentration, and maximum concentration and percentile values.

11.13 WATER RESOURCES

Water will be used from Existing Bore wells in the premises. No New bore wells are to be

dug. Rain water recharging scheme will be incorporated hence the impact on ground water

will be minimized.

11.13.1 Ground Water Quality

The unit is a Zero Discharge unit and Sewage will be allowed in Septic Tank.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. will take all precautions to make its solid waste areas

impervious to water and leachate migration.

Hence it follows that ground water quality is not adversely impacted by M/s. T. J. Agro

Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. activities.

11.14 NOISE LEVELS

Noise levels envisaged shall be within prescribed limits of GPCB at plant boundary, after

implementation of the mitigation measures. DG Sets will be Acoustically Enclosed type.

Green belt development will be made. Hence there will be no adverse impacts on existing

noise levels due to the proposed production activities.

11.15 SOIL / LAND QUALITY

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. will take all precautions to make its Raw Material

Storage, Product Storage, hazardous waste storage area impervious to water and leachate

migration. This will prevent soil contamination.

It follows that soil quality will not be adversely impacted by proposed production activity.

11.16 ENVIRONMENTAL MANAGEMENT PLAN

An environment management plan has been proposed in this report to implement the mitigation

measures. The plan will ensure that the adverse environmental impacts are minimized and the

beneficial impacts are maximized. Detailed plan is discussed in Chapter No. 8 of EIA report.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-11]

11.17 SOLID & HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT

The details of the solid and hazardous waste management is as given in the Table 11.6

TABLE 11.6 SOLID AND HAZARDOUS WASTE MANAGEMENT REQUIREMENT:

Sr.

No. Waste Stream

Waste Cat.

No. As per-

2008

Existing

Qty.

Proposed

Qty.

Total

Qty. to be

Disposed

Source Method of

packing Disposal Method

1. Used oil

5.1 150

Lit/year

150

Lit/year

150

Lit/year

Air Compressor PP Carba/

Drum

Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

disposal by selling to

registered refiners

enlisted by GPCB

/MoEF.

Qty. to be Reused

150 Lit/year

2. Discarded

containers /

barrels / Liner

33.3 30

Kg/month

170

Kg/month

100

Kg/month

Raw material &

Finished product

packing material

PP Bag Collection, Storage,

Transportation and

disposal by selling to

registered refiners

enlisted by GPCB

/MoEF.

Qty. to be Reused

100

Kg/month

3. Silica/Sand -- 4

Kg/month

2

Kg/month

6

Kg/month

Process PP Bag Collection, Storage

& Reuse as Filler in

product

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011

CHAPTER 11 SUMMARY & CONCLUSION

[11-12]

11.18 GREEN BELT DEVELOPMENT

Total plot area of the project is 10,000 m2. Total Proposed Greenbelt area will be 1255 m

2. This

development has been already started. This will attune noise levels and dust levels by acting as a

barrier between the outside environment and the inside environment of the premises.

11.19 MONITORING SCHEDULE

A monitoring schedule has been prepared to ensure effectiveness of the environmental

management plan.

11.20 EXPENDITURE FOR ENVIRONMENTAL ACTIVITIES

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. will spend Approximately Rs. 21.75 Lacs as capital

expenditure on environmental management. The recurring cost is Approximately Rs. 3.5 Lacs per

annum.

11.21 CONCLUSION

The following can be concluded based on the study:

Due to the plant operation no adverse impacts envisaged on Ambient Air, Noise, Ground

water, Land & Soil.

Risk to soil is negligible due to effective management and handling of hazardous wastes and

wastewater.

Socio-economic benefits due to generation of direct / indirect employment.

Thus, it can be concluded on a positive note that after the implementation of the mitigation

measures and Environmental Management Plan the activities of M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt.

Ltd. will have negligible impact on environment and will beneficial to the nearby residents.

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant, Surat February-2011

CHAPTER 12 DISCLOSURE OF CONSULTANTS ENGAGED

[12-1]

12.1 CONSULTANT ENGAGED

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. has engaged M/s. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant as an EIA

consultant.

12.2 BRIEF PROFILE OF CONSULTANT

M/s. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant (EEC) is one of the leading firms in the field of environment.

EEC is enlisted with Gujarat Pollution Control Board (GPCB) as well as with Rajasthan Pollution

Control Board as Consultant and schedule II auditors. Acquainted with well experienced and

knowledgeable staff EEC accomplished various turnkey projects, Environmental Monitoring projects as

well various EIA Projects of various well renowned companies as well as various small scale industries.

Moreover EEC is engaged with various consultancy works as well as audit works.

12.3 SCOPE OF WORK

M/s. T. J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. has engaged EEC for studying the Environmental Impact

Assessment of its expansion project at S. No. 378/379, N.H. No. 8, P.O. Khadsupa Boarding, Opp. Jain

Panjrapore, Tal & Dist. Navsari of Gujarat State. The scope of work includes study of current

environment status with environmental monitoring, assessing the impact of project on environment and

preparation of EIA report along with all the documentation and legal work consideration for the

approval of the project from the state pollution control board.

M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant , Surat February-2011

ANNEXURE 1 ABBREVIATION

SR.

NO. ABBREVIATION FULL FORM

1. AAQM Ambient Air Quality Monitoring

2. Ac Adult Literacy Class

3. BS Bus Station

4. C College

5. C Canal

6. CHW Community Health Worker/Health Worker

7. CONC Concentration

8. CPCB Central Pollution Control Board

9. CWC Child Welfare Centre

10. D Dispensary

11. DA Ayurvedic Dispensary

12. DAP Di-Ammonium Phosphate

13. EA Electricity for all purposes

14. EAG Electricity for Agriculture

15. ED Electricity for domestic

16. ENGG Engineering

17. EO Electricity for other purpose like Industrial, Commercial etc

18. F.G Finished Good

19. FP Foot Path

20. FPC Family Planning Centre

21. FWC Family Welfare Centre

22. GNVFCL Gujarat Narmada Valley Fertilizer Corp. LTD.

23. GPCB Gujarat Pollution Control Board

24. GR. FL Ground Floor

25. GSSP Granulated Single Super Phosphate

26. H Matriculation or Secondary

27. H Hospital

28. H.V High Velocity

29. HDPE High Density Poly Ethylene

30. HP Hand Pump

31. I Industrial School

32. I.D Induced Draft

33. IPL Indian Potash Ltd.

34. KR Kuchcha Road

35. LAB Laboratory

36. LCM Light Calcined Magnesite

37. M Middle School

38. MAINT. Maintenance

39. MCW Maternity & Child Welfare

40. MH Maternity Home

M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant , Surat February-2011

ANNEXURE 1 ABBREVIATION

M/s. T.J. Agro Fertilizers Pvt. Ltd. Envirocare Engineers & Consultant , Surat February-2011

ANNEXURE 1 ABBREVIATION

41. MOP Magnesium Oxide Phosphate

42. MR Mud Road

43. MS Mild Steel

44. N Nallah

45. N.P.K Nitrogen, Phosphorus and Potassium

46. NA Not Applicable

47. NAAQS Nation Ambient Air Quality Standards

48. NH Nursing Home

49. NW Navigable Waterway

50. O Other Educational Institution

51. O Others

52. P Primary School

53. PH Telephone Connection

54. PHC Primary Health Centre

55. PHC Public Health Centre

56. PHS Primary Health Sub-Centre

57. PM Particulate Matter

58. PO Post Office

59. PR Pucca Road

60. PSSP Powder Single Super Phosphate

61. PTO Post & Telegraph Office

62. PUC Senior Secondary School

63. QCD Quality Control Department

64. R River Water

65. R.M Raw Material

66. RCC Reinforce Concrete Cement

67. RCF Rashtriya ChemicalFertilizer

68. RSMML Rajasthan State Mines & Minerals Ltd.

69. RMP Registered Private Practitioner

70. RO Regional Officer

71. RS Railway Station

72. S Higher Secondary School

73. S Spring

74. SSP Single Super Phosphate

75. T Tap Water

76. TB T.B Clinic

77. TK Tank Water

78. TO Telegraph Office

79. Tr Training School

80. TVA Tennenanse Valley Authority

81. TW Tube well Water

82. W Well Water

83. WP Water Proof

Compliance of the CREP Guidelines

SR.

NO. CREP GUIDELINES OUR COMPLIANCE

Wastewater Management

1 Efforts will be made for conservation of water, particularly

with a target to have consumption less than 8.12 and 15 m3

/tone of urea produced for plant based on gas, naphtha and fuel

oil, respectively. In case of plants using Naptha and Gas both as

feed stocks, water consumption target of less than 10m3/ tone

will be achieved. An action plan for this will be submitted by

June 2003 and targets be achieved by March 2004.

Not Applicable

2 Use of arsenic for CO2 absorption in ammonia plants and

chromate based chemicals for cooling system, which is still

continuing in some industries, will be phased out and replaced

with non- arsenic and non- chromate systems by December

2003. In this regard, action plan will be submitted by June

2003.

Not Applicable

3 Adequate treatment for removal of oil, chromium (till non-

chromate based cooling system is in place) and fluoride will be

provided to meet the prescribed standards at the source (end

respective process unit) itself. Action plan will be firmed up by

June 2003 for compliance by March 2004.

Not Applicable

4 Proper and complete nitrification and de-nitrification will be

ensured wherever such process used for effluent treatment, by

September 2003.

Not Applicable

5 Ground water monitoring around the storage facilities and

beyond the factory premises will be carried out at regular

intervals particularly for pH. Fluoride CPCB will finalize the

guidelines for groundwater monitoring by December 2003.

Pucca RCC flooring is provided to prevent any

percolation of any hazardous contamination. Ground

Water Monitoring will be done as per Scheduled of

Monitoring Proposed in EIA report Chapter No: 5 Page

No.5-6.

Compliance of the CREP Guidelines

6 No effluent arising from process plants and associated facilities

will be discharged to the storm water drain. The quality of

storm water will be regularly monitored by all the industries.

Strictly Complied

Storm water monitoring will be carried out. Unit does not

generate any trade effluent.

7 The industries, where waste water/ effluent flows through the

storm water drains even during the dry season will install

continuous systems for monitoring the storm water quality for

pH, ammonia and fluoride. If required, storm water will be

routed through effluent treatment plant before discharging. An

action plan will be submitted by June 2003 and necessary

action will be taken by June 2004.

Not Applicable

Unit does not generate any trade effluent

Air Pollution Management

1 All the upcoming urea plants will have urea prilling towers

based on natural draft so at to minimize urea dust emissions.

Not Applicable

2 The existing urea plants particularly, the plants having forced

draft prilling towers will install appropriate systems (e.g.

scrubber. etc.) for achieving existing norms of urea dust

missions. In this regard, industries will submit action plan by

June 2003 and completion of necessary actions by June 2004.

Not Applicable

3 The sulphuric acid plants having SCSA system will switch over

to DCDA system by March 2004 to meet the emission standard

for SO2 as 2 Kg/tone of H2SO4 produced. An action plan for

this will be submitted by June 2003.

Not Applicable

4 Sulphuric acid plants having DCDA system will improve the

conversion and absorption efficiencies of the system as well as

scrubbers to achieve SO2 emission of 2 Kg/ tone of acid

produced in case of plants having capacity above 300 TPD and

2.5 Kg/ tone in case of plants having capacity up to 300TPD.

An action plan will be submitted by June 2003 and emission

Not Applicable

Compliance of the CREP Guidelines

levels will be complied with by September 2004.

5 Stack height for sulphuric acid plants will be provided as per

the guidelines and on the basis of normal plant operations (and

not when the scrubbers are in use) by June 2003. The scrubbed

gases are to be let out at the same height of the stack.

Not Applicable

6 An action plan for providing proper dust control systems rock

phosphate grinding unit in phosphoric acid plants/ single super

phosphate plants, so as to achieve particulate emission of 150

mg/Nm3 will be submitted by September 2003 and complied

with by March 2004.

A Dry dust Type Bag Filter will be installed to recover

Phosphate dust & reuse it again in Process. Ventury

water scrubber followed by Dry Rock Phosphate bed

will be installed to minimize the concentration of

H2SiF6.

7 Particulate as well as gaseous fluoride will be monitored and

adequate control systems will be installed by June 2004 to

achieve the norms on total fluoride emissions (25 mg/Nm3).

Particulate & Gaseous fluoride monitoring will be

done as per Scheduled of Monitoring Proposed in EIA

report Chapter No: 5 Page No.5-6.

8 Continuous SO2 emission monitoring systems will be installed

in sulphuric acid plants (having capacity 200 TPD and above)

by March 2004. Action plan for this will be submitted by June

2003.

Not Applicable

9 Regular monitoring of ambient air quality with regard to SO2

NOx, PM, SO3, fluoride and acid mist will be carried out.

Regularly Ambient Air Monitoring will be will be done

as per Scheduled of Monitoring Proposed in EIA report

Chapter No: 5 Page No.5-6.

Solid Waste Management

1 Gypsum will be effectively managed by providing proper

lining, dykes with approach roads and monitoring of

groundwater quality around storage facilities. Accumulated

gypsum will be properly capped. In this regard, action plan will

be submitted by June 2003 and for compliance by December

2003.

Not Applicable

Compliance of the CREP Guidelines

2 An action plan for proper handling, storage and disposal of

spent catalyst having toxic metals will be submitted by June

2003 and implemented by September 2003. The industry will

also explore recovery/buy-back of spent catalyst by September

2003.

Not Applicable

3 Carbon slurry, sulphurmuck and chalk will be properly

managed and disposed of in properly designed landfill either

within premises or in common facility. Action plan on this will

be submitted by June 2003 and implemented by March 2004.

Not Applicable

4 Existing stock of chromium and arsenic bearing sludge will be

properly disposed by December 2003. Industries will also

explore recovery of chromium from the sludge. CPCB will

provide guidelines for proper disposal of the sludge.

Not Applicable