CCChhhaaapppttteeerrr 999::: CCCUUURRRRRRIIICCCUUULLLUUUMMM IIINNN MMMAAALLLAAAYYYSSSIIIAAA

Malaysia with a population of over 26 million people, has about 5 million

students in primary and secondary schools. Education under the control of the

Ministry of Education (MOE) is responsible for the development of primary and

secondary education in the country. Of late, administration and development of

tertiary education has been taken over by the Ministry of Higher Education. Primary

education is for a period of six years; aimed at providing a foundation in reading,

writing and arithmetic (3R‟s). At the end of the six years, students sit for The Primary

School Assessment Test (UPSR). All students continue to secondary education which

LEARNING OUTCOMES

When you complete this module will be able to:

Describe the education system during the colonial period

Explain how the Razak and Rahman Talib laid the foundation of

Malaysia‟s education system

List the features of the Malaysia‟s philosophy of education

Describe the curriculum development process

OVERVIEW

9.0 Introduction

9.1 Curriculum during the colonial

period

The Cheesman Plan

The Barnes Report

The Fenn-Wu Report

9.2 Curriculum initiatives after

independence

The Razak Report

The Rahman Talib

Report

The Cabinet Commission

on Education

9.3 Curriculum Reform

Integrated Primary School

Curriculum

Integrated Secondary

School Curriculum

Teaching Methods

The Education Bill, 1995

9.4 Curriculum development

process in Malaysia

Discussion Questions

9.0 Introduction

is divided into three main levels: lower secondary level, upper secondary level and

pre-university level.

Lower secondary education in Malaysia prepares students to develop skills

needed in life and to be useful citizens of the country. After completing the third year,

students are required to take the Lower Secondary Assessment (PMR). Performance

in this examination will determine their academic streaming in upper secondary i.e.

whether to be in the science, arts, technical or vocational streams. At the end of the

two-year period in upper secondary education, students are assessed by a compulsory

national examination called the Malaysian Certificate of Examination (SPM) or

Malaysian Vocational Certificate of Examination (SPVM) as in the case of the

vocational stream.

After which students will proceed for two more years (or less) of Form 6,

Matriculation or Foundation Studies before gaining entry into public tertiary

institutions. Others might continue with pre-university studies or foundation courses

before entering private tertiary institutions. Others might continue to pursue diploma

or certificate courses or undergo advance skills training in selected training centres or

join teacher training colleges. Still others will join the work force and some may be

trained on the job.

During British rule, the policy of divide and rule was implemented through an

education system designed to create a divided population. The Malays were only

given six years of primary education. Three objectives were defined for Malay

education (1) to familiarize Malay boys with simple arithmetic to handle small

business transactions, (2) to develop better a sense of hygiene, and (3) to train the

sons of the Malay aristocracy in English to serve the colonial masters.

The Indians were also given six years of elementary education, and expected

to provide labor for the rubber plantations and railways. This was a deliberate policy

to deny them both economic and geographical mobility. The Chinese, on the other

hand, were allowed to establish their own schools and use curricula, teachers and

textbooks from China, as the British colonial government did not consider it their

obligation to provide education to a transient or temporary population..

The colonial government, however, established English schools to supply

sufficient manpower for the British administrative machinery. These schools were

mainly located in urban areas. For example, in 1896 there were 9 English schools in

the main town of Perak. Most of the students in these schools were Chinese and

Indians with only about 15% Malays. Thus, education system divided the population

of Malaysia for a hundred years or so.

The Cheesman Plan (1946)

After the Second World War, a new education policy called the Cheeseman

Plan (1946) introduced free primary education in all languages. The plan advocated

9.1 Curriculum During the Colonial Period

In 1896 in Perak, the 88 Malay schools succeeded in producing 118 clerks and orderlies, 2070 padi farmers, 2177 small traders and labourers, and 1000 other types of workers. - Education Report for 1896 in Perak Annual Report

the use of the four different languages as medium of instruction in secondary schools.

The teaching of 'mother tongues' was to be made available in the English schools, and

at the same time the teaching of English was to be made compulsory in all vernacular

schools. The new policy of parallel bilingualism paid no attention toward integrating

the people. However, the policy was abandoned in 1949 with the demise of the

Malayan Union.

The Barnes Report (1951)

Realising the plight of Malay schools, a committee composed of 8 Malays

and 5 English members was established in 1951 to study Malay education and headed

by Dr. Barnes, a social scientist from Oxford University. They were trusted with the

task studying the resources, facilities and opportunities for Malaya education. The

Barnes' Committee was unable to propose improvement in Malay schools without

involving the whole system of education. As such, the Barnes' Report (1951) made a

radical recommendation that all existing schools should be transformed into National

schools in which children of the various ethnic groups would be taught using Malay

and English. It recommended that education would be free and modern teaching

methods would be used with emphasis on active learning, development of thinking

and active participation in school activities.

The recommendations of the Barnes Report implied that eventually vernacular

schools would disappear, including Malay schools (Omar Hashim1961). As expected,

the non-Malays, especially the Chinese reacted strongly against it because they saw

this as a move to eliminate their language and cultural identity.

The Fenn-Wu Report (1952)

A committee headed by Dr. W.P. Fenn and Dr. Y.T. Wu was given the task of

studying the status of Chinese vernacular education in Malaysia to incorporate it into

a unified education system This resulted in the formation of another committee called

the Fenn-Wu Committee which was formed in 1952. It had the impression that most

Chinese were prepared to accept Malay and English as media of instruction, and at the

same time could continue learning their mother tongue to keep their cultural identity.

This system would make Chinese medium students trilingual while others would be

bilingual. The Fenn-Wu Report seemed to make the same claim for the Indians.

Mother tongues of the Indian communities (Tamil, Telugu and Punjabi) were to be

retained in Indian schools.

In summary, the educational system before independence promoted

ethnocentricity as they “socialized the child to a Malay, or a Chinese or an Indian

world-view which was relevant to the maintenance of the cultural identify of each

group, but they were all increasingly incongruous in the rapidly changing political

social, and economic conditions of a country preparing for national independence

(Chai, 1977, p. 26).

SELF-TEST 1. Why did the Malays object to the Cheesman Plan?

2. Why did the Chinese object to the recommendations of the

Barnes Report?

Razak Report 1956 and the Education Ordinance 1957 As Malaysia moved towards independence, there was growing realisation that

unifying the various ethnic groups was a priority. A committee headed by Dato Abdul

Razak Hussein was established and the recommendations of the Razak Report of 1956

laid the foundation of the Malaysia education system. In many ways the Razak Report

incorporated the ideas of the Barnes and Fenn-Wu Reports. The Report emphasised

that although the intention of the government was to gradually introduce Malay as the

national language, it also had full intentions of maintaining other local languages. The

Report recommended the the followingL

The Malay language was to be the National Language and suggested that the

Roman script be used.

the existing bilingualism in the primary schools would remain,

all schools, irrespective of language medium should use common curriculum

content, i.e. a Malaysian centred curriculum with a single system of evaluation

for all.

the Malay medium schools were called National Schools, and schools using

English, Mandarin and Tamil as medium of instruction were categorized as

National-Type schools.

The use of common curriculum contents irrespective of medium of instruction was

easily achieved. It was hoped that the common syllabus content would inculcate

common values and outlook in life, and eventually forge a new integrated nation.

Still its implementation faced much resentment. Early efforts to achieve unity

through education were too weak and steps taken were not effective to bring about

social integration. It merely endorsed the prevailing status quo with some curriculum

change. The only positive change was that secondary education for the Malays which

was neglected before was made available then.

The policy to establish Malay medium secondary schools was to bring

together children of all ethnic groups under one national education system, in which,

Malay was to be the medium of instruction. That would orientate all schools to have a

common Malaysian outlook (Razak Report, 1956). However, the report also

mentioned that 'that progress towards this goal cannot be rushed' (Razak Report,

1956: para 12 ).

Rahman Talib Report and Education Act 1961 In February, 1960, the Government appointed a committee headed by the then

Minister of Education, Abdul Rahman Talib to review the Education Policy of 1956,

to study its past and future implementation. The Report recommended the following:

The establishment of teacher-training arrangements to facilitate expansion of

the school system

The provision of a place in a primary school using the language medium of the

parents choice for any Malaysian child of primary school age.

The school-leaving age be raised to 15 with abolishment of the Year 6

national examination wherein those students who had failed were not

permitted to continue to secondary school.

That primary education should be made free with effect from 1962.

9.2 Curriculum Initiatives After Independence

The Rahman Talib Report of 1960 reiterated the need for Malay and English to be

compulsory subjects in the curriculum of all schools. The guiding feature was national

unity through making the Malay language the National Language. Realising that

conversion of a Malay medium of instruction would be extremely difficult without

appropriate textbooks, the report also recommended that the Ministry of Education

appoint qualified teachers to translate books into Malay.

The Cabinet Committee on Education, 1979

The Cabinet Report of 1979 proposed the following:

o Stress on 3R basic education . reading, writing and arithmetic

o Stress on a strong spiritual education and the desired elements of discipline

o Stress on a Malaysian curriculum

o Upper secondary education of two streams, academic and vocational

o Opportunity to continue education from 9 years to 11 years

o Facilitation of education management procedures to improve the overall

quality of education

The major curriculum reform in the Malaysian education system is the

introduction of the Integrated Primary School Curriculum in 1983 and the Integrated

Secondary School Curriculum in 1989. The curriculum was reformed because of the

demand from society that the existing curriculum was overloaded and the relatively

disturbing number of students who could not read and write at the desired level. The

revamp of the curriculum was based on the National Philosophy of Education.

9.3 Curriculum Reform

We recommend that education at secondary level paid for from public funds shall be

conducted mainly in the medium of one of the two official languages (Malay and

English) with the intention of ultimately using the national language as the main

medium of instruction, except that other languages and literatures may be taught and

learnt in their own media.... It is not possible, within the framework of a policy which

is truly national, to satisfy completely all the individual demands of each cultural and

language group in the country. We believe that the present system of providing at

public expense primary education in each of the four main languages goes as far as is

reasonably possible for a national Malayan system to go in satisfying the needs of our

various peoples. (Rahman Talib Report, 1960:3-4).

SELF-TEST 1. What are the recommendation of the Razak Report?

2. What are the recommendations of the Rahman Talib Report?

National Philosophy of Education

Education in Malaysia is an on-going effort towards further developing the

potential of individuals in a holistic and integrated manner, so as to produce

individuals who are intellectually, spiritually, emotionally and physically

balanced and harmonic, based on a firm belief in and devotion to God. Such

an effort is designed to produce Malaysian citizens who are knowledgeable

and competent, who possess high moral standards and who are responsible

and capable of achieving high level of personal well-being as well as being

able to contribute to the harmony and betterment of the family, the society

and the nation at large"

The role of the curriculum is to produce a Malaysian citizen who is well-

rounded, skilful and cherishes the goal of achieving national unity. The underlying

principle of the curriculum is the integrated approach. The integrated approach calls

for the infusion of moral values, patriotism, science and technology, proper use of

language, environmental education, study skills, creative and critical thinking.

Infusion of these ideas is to occur across subject areas. For example, patriotism is

discusses in history and local studies. Concepts in environmental education is to be

infused in subject such as geography, science and biology.

The Integrated Primary School Curriculum (ICPS) The Integrated Primary School Curriculum is divided into two phases that is

Phase 1 (Year1-3) and Phase II (Year 4-6). The curriculum emphasises the mastery,

reinforcement and application of the 3Rs and the acquisition of complex skills and

knowledge. Also, emphasised is the development of positive attitudes and values. The

content is divided into six components: basic skills, humanities, art and recreation,

values and attitudes, living skills and communication skills. The compulsory subjects

are Bahasa Malaysia, English, mathematics, Islamic Education, moral education,

music, art, physical education, science. local studies and living skills.

The Integrated Secondary School Curriculum (KBSM) The Integrated Secondary School Curriculum emphasised on providing a

general education and consolidation of skills acquired in the primary grades. The

secondary school curriculum continued to focus on the development of positive

attitudes and values among students. The lower secondary curriculum was comprised

of the following subjects: Bahasa Malaysia, English, mathematics, Islamic Education,

moral education, science, geography, history, physical education, art and living skills.

In the upper secondary curriculum, besides compulsory subjects such as history,

mathematics, Bahasa Malaysia, English, moral education/Islamic education; students

select elective subjects from the humanities, pure sciences, Islamic studies, applied

arts, information technology, technology and languages.

Teaching Methods

To enhance student interest and motivation, teachers are encouraged to use

different teaching-learning strategies. Small group techniques should be widely used

to accommodate the different learning styles of students. Remedial activities are

9.4 Curriculum Development Process in Malaysia

employed to assist students who are unable to achieve the desired learning outcomes

while enrichment activities are made available for more advanced students.

Every effort should be made to encourage students to be independent learners.

Students should be encouraged to reflect on their learning and be able to transfer their

learning across the curriculum to situations outside the curriculum. The use of ICT in

teaching and learning is to enhanced. For example, the resources of the internet

should is to be exploited and the various web tools should be employed to make

learning more meaningful and interesting.

Education Bill 1995

o The national education system is designed to produce world-class education from

the aspect of quality to achieve the nation‟s aspirations

o The National Education Policy becomes the base for the national education

policy

o Duration of primary education is between 5 and 7 years

o Pre-school education is part of the national education system

o Technical and polytechnic education are upgraded

o Allocations are made for the supervision of private education

Curriculum in Malaysia is developed centrally and within the Ministry of Education

(MOE). The three main departments responsible are for the design and development

of school curriculum are the

Curriculum Development Centre (CDC): designs and develops curriculum for

preschool to upper secondary

Department of Technical and Vocational Education: designs and develops

technical and vocational curriculum for technical and vocational schools

Department of Religious and Moral Education: designs and develops

curriculum for religious education including the teaching of Arabic.

However, all matters regarding curriculum policies have to be approved by the

Central Curriculum Committee (CCC) headed by the Director-General of Education.

The Committee comprises the various directors of the divisions under the MOE such

as the Textbook Division, Teacher Education Division, Examination Syndicate,

Educational Technology Division and the School Division. For example, the

introduction of a new subject has to be discussed and approved by the Committee

before it can be implemented in schools.

SELF-TEST 1. What is meant by integration in the integrated primary and

secondary curriculum?

Curriculum programmes that have been approved by the CCC have to

discussed and approved by the Curriculum Implementation Committee (CIC)

comprising of 14 state directors of education and representatives of various agencies

of the MOE. This Committee would discuss in detail aspects relating to

implementation of the curriculum plan.

The process of curriculum development is based on a cyclical model

beginning with a needs analysis, followed by planning, development, piloting,

dissemination and implementation and evaluation (see Figure 10.1). The idea for a

curriculum initiative may begin with a directive from policy makers such as the

government; from changing world trends, or just from the realisation that existing

curriculum suffers from certain weaknesses identified. A team headed by the CDC

consisting of MOE officers, academics, professional bodies and industry

representatives is appointed. to plan and design the new curriculum or revise an

existing curriculum. The first task of team members is to review available literature

and reports of practices in other countries. The aim is to provide a theoretical and

philosophical framework for the new or revised curriculum.

Teachers and teacher trainers are brought in to discuss the design of the

curriculum and the most effective delivery of the curriculum. Discussion focuses on

selection of content, the breaking up of content for each year of schooling and

suggested learning activities and teaching methods. This job is done by the CDC

together with its committee of subject matter specialists, educationists, teachers and

teacher trainers. The curriculum specifications agreed upon form the basis for

textbooks and other supporting materials. Also produced are general teacher guides

and guides for specific topics.

The curriculum is than piloted in selected schools. At this stage, the education

department of the states involved are brought in. Based on the findings of the piloted

schools or „limited implementation‟, decision is made to proceed to full

implementation.

The nationwide implementation of a curriculum is undertaken by the

following agencies of the MOE:

The Curriculum Development Centre is involved in the dissemination of the

curriculum and „key personnel‟ are appointed who consist mainly of senior

teachers and teacher trainers and are charged with the responsibility of

disseminating the curriculum.

The Textbook Division undertakes the preparation of textbooks and other

supplementary material.

The Educational Technology Division undertakes preparation of multimedia

material to support the implementation of the curriculum.

The Examination Syndication is involved in student assessment.

Figure 9.1 Curriculum Development Cycle

[source: Development of Education, National Report Malaysia]

At the state level the State Curriculum Committee headed by the State

Director of Education monitors, assesses and facilitates implementation of the

curriculum by principals and headmasters (see Figure 9.2). The state committee

organisers meetings and workshops with principals, headmasters, district education

officers and teachers. It also assists in the coordination of resources while acting as

intermediary between Division/District Curriculum Committee and the MOE.

At the district level, the planning and implementation activities are carried out

by the District Curriculum Committee. It provides guidance and assistance in

implementing curriculum at the school and classroom level.

At the school level, the curriculum committee is headed by the principal or

headmaster who supervises the implementation of the classroom in the classroom.

The committee facilitates implementation of the curriculum by providing teachers

with relevant resources, guidance and support. The committee also provides feedback

on implementation to their respective district committees.

Research & Planning

Need Analysis

Design & Development

Trial / Limited

Implementation

Dissemination & Implementation

Supervision & Evaluation

SELF-TEST 1. Describe the curriculum development and implementation

process in Malaysia.

Figure 9.2 Curriculum Implementation Process

[source: Development of Education, National Report Malaysia]

EDUCATION PLANNING COMMITTEE

Chairman: Minister of Education

CENTRAL CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

Chairman: Director General of Education

CURRICULUM IMPLEMENTATION COMMITTEE

Chairman: Deputy Director General of Education

DIVISION/DISTRICT CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

Chairman: Division/State Education Officer

STATE CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

Chairman: State Education Director

SCHOOL CURRICULUM COMMITTEE

Chairman: Principal/Headmaster

DISCUSSION QUESTIONS:

1. “If the recommendations of the Barnes Report were fully implemented, the

Malaysian education system would be different”. Discuss

2. To what extent has school system produced Malaysians as enshrined in the

National Philosophy of Education?