characterizing immune evasion in ffpe tissue sections ... · poster sitc 2015- characterizing...

1
Characterizing immune evasion in FFPE tissue sections – new method for measuring cellular interactions via multiplexed phenotype mapping and spatial point patterns C. Hoyt 1 ; C. Wang 1 , K. Roman 1 , K. Johnson 1 , P Miller 1 , E. Mittendorf 2 1) PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA; 2) MD Anderson, Houston, TX PerkinElmer, Inc., 68 Elm Street, Hopkinton, MA USA (800) 762-4000 or (+1) 203 925-4602 www.perkinelmer.com Conclusions The approach shows reliable detection of immune cell phenotypes and segmentation of tumor and stroma, to accurately assess interaction between immune and tumor cells. We believe results support the feasibility of a practical and viable clinical workflow, in which immune response assessment is automated by computer and results are reviewed by pathologists to assure data quality. Abstract Background Full realization of the potential of immunotherapy will require biomarkers that capture immuno-tumor interactions. This will most effectively be achieved by phenotyping cells in-situ in intact tissue sections. Such methods will potentially predict response to drugs and monitor efficacy and onset of resistance. Existing methods are limited. Here we report a novel integrated approach, utilizing highly multiplexed immunofluorescence labeling, imaging-based analysis to capture expression and cellular interactions in tumor and the microenvironment, and statistical analysis. Of particular interest is applicability of this approach to intact FFPE tissue sections, amenable to routine pathology workflow. The capability of this technology to show the range of immune-tumor interactions is demonstrated on a set of breast cancer samples. Methods Breast specimens were labeled for CD4, CD8, CD20, PD-L1, Foxp3, cytokeratin, and DAPI with a new serial same-species fluorescence labeling approach utilizing tyramide signal amplification (Opal TM ), and microwave-based antigen retrieval and antibody stripping, which enables specific, non-interfering, balanced labeling. Samples were imaged on a multispectral slide analysis system, and analyzed with pattern recognition software, to segment tissue into tumor and stroma, and phenotype cells using a new multinomial logistic regression learning capability that is intuitive, fast, and reliable across clinical variability. Cells were phenotyped into categories of tumor, killer T, helper T, regulatory T, B cells, producing cell phenotype maps retaining spatial arrangements. Imagery was assessed by a pathologist for segmentation and cell phenotyping accuracy, and then evaluated using spatial point pattern analysis. As an example statistic, nearest-neighbor calculations are performed to determine percentage of tumor cells having killer T cells within 25 microns. Results Labeling of five breast cancer samples demonstrated specificity and sensitivity estimated by a pathologist to be greater than 95% accurate. The five cases presented significantly different killer T and tumor cell interaction statistics. As an example, nearest- neighbor analysis indicates the five cases had, respectively, 54%, 10%, 61%, 33%, and 55% of tumor cells having killer T cells within 25 microns (Example case in Figure 1). This is one metric of many that will be presented, that clearly delineate immune-tumor interactions. cyan = CK purple = killer T cell green = helper T cell red = B cell orange = PD-L1 yellow = Foxp3 Phenotypes tumor killer T helper T T-reg B cell other 33% of tumor cells have a killer T cell within 25 microns distance Phenotype Counts Tumor 1,810 Killer T 213 Helper T 0 Regulator T 14 B cell 1,270 Other 2,160 Total 6,467 Phenotype Counts Tumor 4,380 Killer T 146 Helper T 640 Regulator T 156 B cell 208 Other 2,500 Total 9,260 4% of tumor cells have a killer T cell within 25 microns distance 41% of tumor cells have a killer T cell within 25 microns distance Phenotype Counts Tumor 3,620 Killer T 203 Helper T 285 Regulator T 127 B cell 218 Other 1,850 Total 6,307 Phenotype Counts Tumor 4,630 Killer T 1,070 Helper T 962 Regulator T 236 B cell 80 Other 1,230 Total 8,206 3% of tumor cells have a killer T cell within 25 microns distance Phenotypes tumor killer T helper T T-reg B cell other Phenotypes tumor killer T helper T T-reg B cell other Phenotypes tumor killer T helper T T-reg B cell other cyan = CK purple = killer T cell green = helper T cell red = B cell orange = PD-L1 yellow = Foxp3 cyan = CK purple = killer T cell green = helper T cell red = B cell orange = PD-L1 yellow = Foxp3 cyan = CK purple = killer T cell green = helper T cell red = B cell orange = PD-L1 yellow = Foxp3 Pseudo Composite Case #1 Case #2 Case #3 Case #4 How we did this Phenotyping In-situ Point Pattern Analysis Tyramide signal amplification (TSA) Multiplexed labeling using antibody stripping (Opal TM method) Multispectral imaging (Vectra TM ) Automated image analysis tissue segmentation using trainable pattern recognition and cell phenotyping using multinomial logistic regression (inForm TM ) Spatial point pattern analysis in R Opal TM multiplexed staining method

Upload: others

Post on 11-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Characterizing immune evasion in FFPE tissue sections ... · Poster SITC 2015- Characterizing immune evasion in FFPE tissue sections new method for measuring cellular interactions

Characterizing immune evasion in FFPE tissue sections – new method for measuring cellular interactions via multiplexed phenotype mapping and spatial point patterns

C. Hoyt1; C. Wang1, K. Roman1, K. Johnson1, P Miller1, E. Mittendorf2 1) PerkinElmer, Hopkinton, MA; 2) MD Anderson, Houston, TX

PerkinElmer, Inc., 68 Elm Street, Hopkinton, MA USA (800) 762-4000 or (+1) 203 925-4602 www.perkinelmer.com

Conclusions The approach shows reliable detection of immune cell

phenotypes and segmentation of tumor and stroma, to

accurately assess interaction between immune and

tumor cells. We believe results support the feasibility

of a practical and viable clinical workflow, in which

immune response assessment is automated by

computer and results are reviewed by pathologists to

assure data quality.

Abstract Background

Full realization of the potential of

immunotherapy will require biomarkers that

capture immuno-tumor interactions. This will

most effectively be achieved by phenotyping

cells in-situ in intact tissue sections. Such

methods will potentially predict response to

drugs and monitor efficacy and onset of

resistance. Existing methods are limited. Here

we report a novel integrated approach, utilizing

highly multiplexed immunofluorescence

labeling, imaging-based analysis to capture

expression and cellular interactions in tumor

and the microenvironment, and statistical

analysis. Of particular interest is applicability of

this approach to intact FFPE tissue sections,

amenable to routine pathology workflow. The

capability of this technology to show the range

of immune-tumor interactions is demonstrated

on a set of breast cancer samples.

Methods

Breast specimens were labeled for CD4, CD8,

CD20, PD-L1, Foxp3, cytokeratin, and DAPI

with a new serial same-species fluorescence

labeling approach utilizing tyramide signal

amplification (OpalTM), and microwave-based

antigen retrieval and antibody stripping, which

enables specific, non-interfering, balanced

labeling. Samples were imaged on a

multispectral slide analysis system, and

analyzed with pattern recognition software, to

segment tissue into tumor and stroma, and

phenotype cells using a new multinomial

logistic regression learning capability that is

intuitive, fast, and reliable across clinical

variability. Cells were phenotyped into

categories of tumor, killer T, helper T, regulatory

T, B cells, producing cell phenotype maps

retaining spatial arrangements. Imagery was

assessed by a pathologist for segmentation

and cell phenotyping accuracy, and then

evaluated using spatial point pattern analysis.

As an example statistic, nearest-neighbor

calculations are performed to determine

percentage of tumor cells having killer T cells

within 25 microns.

Results

Labeling of five breast cancer samples

demonstrated specificity and sensitivity

estimated by a pathologist to be greater than

95% accurate. The five cases presented

significantly different killer T and tumor cell

interaction statistics. As an example, nearest-

neighbor analysis indicates the five cases had,

respectively, 54%, 10%, 61%, 33%, and 55% of

tumor cells having killer T cells within 25

microns (Example case in Figure 1). This is

one metric of many that will be presented, that

clearly delineate immune-tumor interactions.

cyan = CK

purple = killer T cell

green = helper T cell

red = B cell

orange = PD-L1

yellow = Foxp3

Phenotypes

tumor

killer T

helper T

T-reg

B cell

other

33% of tumor cells have a killer T

cell within 25 microns distance

Phenotype Counts

Tumor 1,810

Killer T 213

Helper T 0

Regulator T 14

B cell 1,270

Other 2,160

Total 6,467

Phenotype Counts

Tumor 4,380

Killer T 146

Helper T 640

Regulator T 156

B cell 208

Other 2,500

Total 9,260

4% of tumor cells have a killer T

cell within 25 microns distance

41% of tumor cells have a killer T

cell within 25 microns distance

Phenotype Counts

Tumor 3,620

Killer T 203

Helper T 285

Regulator T 127

B cell 218

Other 1,850

Total 6,307

Phenotype Counts

Tumor 4,630

Killer T 1,070

Helper T 962

Regulator T 236

B cell 80

Other 1,230

Total 8,206

3% of tumor cells have a killer T

cell within 25 microns distance

Phenotypes

tumor

killer T

helper T

T-reg

B cell

other

Phenotypes

tumor

killer T

helper T

T-reg

B cell

other

Phenotypes

tumor

killer T

helper T

T-reg

B cell

other

cyan = CK

purple = killer T cell

green = helper T cell

red = B cell

orange = PD-L1

yellow = Foxp3

cyan = CK

purple = killer T cell

green = helper T cell

red = B cell

orange = PD-L1

yellow = Foxp3

cyan = CK

purple = killer T cell

green = helper T cell

red = B cell

orange = PD-L1

yellow = Foxp3

Pseudo Composite

Case #1

Case #2

Case #3

Case #4

How we did this

Phenotyping In-situ Point Pattern Analysis

• Tyramide signal amplification (TSA)

• Multiplexed labeling using antibody

stripping (OpalTM method)

• Multispectral imaging (VectraTM)

• Automated image analysis – tissue

segmentation using trainable pattern

recognition and cell phenotyping using

multinomial logistic regression (inFormTM)

• Spatial point pattern analysis in R

OpalTM multiplexed staining method