charged particle tracker for a rhic/eic joint detector detector layouts based on eic and nlc physics...

31
Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations based on different layouts Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University C/EIC joint detector discussion, BNL, Sept.1

Post on 19-Dec-2015

216 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Charged Particle Tracker for

a RHIC/EIC joint detector

Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations based on different layouts

Rene Bellwied, Wayne State University

RHIC/EIC joint detector discussion, BNL, Sept.19th

Page 2: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The EIC detector concept

Page 3: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The EIC parton detector concept

Magnetic field strength: ?

Page 4: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

For comparison: two LC detector options

Both detector options have now all calorimetry inside the magnet.

Old

B = 5 T B = 3 T

Page 5: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Large detector option for LCD

Page 6: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Large detector option for LCD

Page 7: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Silicon detector option for LCD

Page 8: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Silicon detector option for LCD

Page 9: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Central tracker: Silicon Drift DetectorsFive layersRadiation length / layer = 0.5 %sigma_rphi = 7 m, sigma_rz = 10 m

            Layer Radii    Half-lengths             -----------    ------------              20.00 cm      26.67 cm              46.25 cm        61.67 cm              72.50 cm        96.67 cm              98.75 cm       131.67 cm             125.00 cm       166.67 cm

56 m2 SiliconWafer size: 10 by 10 cm # of Wafers: 6000 (incl. spares)# of Channels: 4,404,480 channels (260 m pitch)

       

Silicon detector option for LCD (small detector, high field B=5T)

Forward tracker: Silicon StripFive disks uniformly spaced in zRadiation length / layer = 1.0 % Double-sided with 90 degree stereo, sigma = 7m

Inner radii      Outer radii    Z position             -----------      -----------    ----------               4.0 cm           20.50 cm       27.1 cm               7.9 cm           46.75 cm       62.1 cm              11.7 cm           73.00 cm       97.1 cm              15.6 cm           99.25 cm      132.1 cm              19.5 cm          125.50 cm      167.1 cm           Vertex detector:CCD 5 layers uniformly spaced (r = 1.2 cm to 6.0 cm)  Half-length of layer 1 = 2.5 cm   Half-length of layers 2-5 = 12.5 cm   sigma_rphi = sigma_rz = 5 microns Radiation length / layer = 0.1 %      

Page 10: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The SCT Semiconductor Tracker

4 barrels9 wheels

9 wheels

5.6 m

1.04 m

1.53 m

4088 Modules

~ 61 m2 of silicon

15,392 silicon wafers

~ 6.3 million of readout channels

Barrel diameters:Barrel diameters:

B3: 568 mmB3: 568 mm

B4: 710 mmB4: 710 mm

B5: 854 mmB5: 854 mm

B6: 996 mmB6: 996 mm

Page 11: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

9,648,128 strips = electronics channel

440 m2 of Si wafers, 210 m2 of Si sensors

CMS Silicon Detector

Page 12: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Physics Drivers (e.g. for NLC)

Page 13: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Technical Issues (1)

Page 14: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Technical Issues (2)

Page 15: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Technical Issues (3)

Page 16: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Stripixels:something new from BNL

(why ? SDD’s might be too slow)

Alternating Stripixel Detector (ASD) Interleaved Stripixel Detector (ISD)

Pseudo-3d readout with speed and resolution comparable to double-side strip detector

(Zheng Li, BNL report, Nov.2000)

Page 17: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The SVT in STARThe final device….The final device….

… and all its

connections

… and all its

connections

Page 18: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

STAR-SVT characteristics

216 wafers (bi-directional drift) = 432 hybrids 3 barrels, r = 5, 10, 15 cm, 103,680 channels, 13,271,040 pixels 6 by 6 cm active area = max. 3 cm drift, 3 mm (inactive) guard area max. HV = 1500 V, max. drift time = 5 s, (TPC drift time = 50 s) anode pitch = 250 m, cathode pitch = 150 m SVT cost: $7M for 0.7m2 of silicon Radiation length: 1.4% per layer

0.3% silicon, 0.5% FEE (Front End Electronics), 0.6% cooling and support. Beryllium support structure. FEE placed beside wafers. Water cooling.

Page 19: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Typical SDD Resolution

Page 20: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Wafers: B and T dependence

Used at B=6T. B fields parallel to drift increase the resistance and slow the drift velocity.

The detectors work well up to 50oC but are also very T-dependent. T-variations of 0.10C cause a 10% drift velocity variation

Detectors are operated at room temperature in STAR.

We monitor these effect via MOS charge injectors

0 1 2 3 4 5 65.2

5.3

5.4

5.5

5.6

5.7

5.8

5.9

6.0

6.1

Drif

t V

eloc

ity (m

/ns)

Magnetic Field (T)

Page 21: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Present status of technology

STAR 4in. NTD material, 3 kcm, 280 m thick, 6.3 by 6.3 cm area 250 m readout pitch, 61,440 pixels per detector SINTEF produced 250 good wafers (70% yield)

ALICE 6in. NTD material, 2 kcm, 280 m thick, 280 m pitch CANBERRA produced around 100 prototypes, good yield

Future 6in. NTD, 150 micron thick, any pitch between 200-400 m 10 by 10 cm wafer

Page 22: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Silicon Drift Detector Features

Mature technology. <10 micron resolution achievable with $’s

and R&D. Easy along one axis (anodes). <0.5% radiation length/layer achievable if

FEE moved to edges. Low number of channels translates to low

cost silicon detectors with good resolution. Detector could be operated with air cooling

at room temperature

Page 23: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Expected Impact Parameter Resolution

Page 24: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Results for b/c tagging performance

Page 25: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

Expected Momentum Resolution

Page 26: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

SD Tracking efficiencies:For 100% hit efficiency: (97.3±0.10)%For 98% hit efficiency: (96.6±0.12)%For 90% hit efficiency: (92.7±0.16)%

Tracking efficiencies:For 100% hit efficiency: (95.3±0.13)%For 98% hit efficiency: (94.5±0.14)%For 90% hit efficiency: (89.5±0.20)%

LD

Tracking efficiencies LD vs. SD

Page 27: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

SD For hit efficiency 100%:Missing energy = (5.7±0.4) GeV = (3.3±0.2)%Ghost energy = (4.8±0.4) GeV = (2.9±0.2)%

For hit efficiency 100%:Missing energy = (11.7±0.6) GeV = (7.1±0.3)%Ghost energy = (19.6±0.8) GeV = (13.1±0.6)%

LD

Missing and ghost energies

Page 28: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

With the maximum of d3p distribution at ~(1.5-2)10-3, the data are consistentwith the earlier momentum resolution simulations (B. Schumm, VR, et al):

within a factor of ~2 in the momentum range of 0.5 GeV/c < pT < 20 GeV/c.

2225 /2500102 cGeVpp TTpT

Preliminary conclusions

Momentum resolution

With the existing 3d tracking and pattern recognition software (Mike Ronan et al.) the Silicon option has a slight advantage in tracking efficiency, shows less missing and ghost energy, and less ghost tracks)

Page 29: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

R&D for Large Tracker Application

Improve position resolution to 5m Decrease anode pitch from 250 to 100m. Stiffen resistor chain and drift faster.

Improve radiation length Reduce wafer thickness from 300m to 150m Move FEE to edges or change from hybrid to SVX Air cooling vs. water cooling

Use 6in instead of 4in Silicon wafers to reduce #channels. More extensive radiation damage studies.

Detectors/FEE can withstand around 100 krad (,n) PASA is BIPOLAR (intrinsically rad. hard.) SCA can be produced in rad. hard process.

Page 30: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The CLEO detector

Page 31: Charged Particle Tracker for a RHIC/EIC joint detector Detector layouts based on EIC and NLC Physics drivers Silicon detector technologies Simulations

The CLEO calorimeter

CLEO II quadrant viewCalorimeter specs:7,800 Th doped CsI crystals(6,144 in barrel)Each crystal 5 by 5 by 30 cmAngular Resolution ~5-10 mrad

Barrel resolution:E/E (%) = 0.35/E0.75 + 1.9 - 0.1E

Endcap resolution:E/E (%) = 0.26/E + 2.5

= 2-3% for 1 GeV e- or