charles hakes fort lewis college1. charles hakes fort lewis college2

54
Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College 1

Upload: valentine-hamilton

Post on 17-Dec-2015

218 views

Category:

Documents


1 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 1

Page 2: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 2

Page 3: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 3

Chapter 15-16

The Milky Way

Dark MatterExtending the Distance Scale

Page 4: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 4

Mapping the Milky Way

Page 5: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 5

Spiral Galaxies

• A view of spiral galaxies from face-on and edge-on.

Page 6: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 6

Figure 14.1Galactic Plane

Page 7: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 7

Mapping the Milky Way

• Radio observations can determine much of the structure and rotation rates.

Page 8: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 8

Mapping the Milky Way

• Radio observations can determine much of the structure and rotation rates.

• Orderly rotation in the plane.• Random orbits in the halo.

Page 9: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 9

Figure 14.12Stellar Orbits in Our Galaxy

Page 10: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 10

Figure 14.10Observations of the Galactic Disk

Page 11: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 11

Mass of the Milky Way

• Recall Newton’s modification to Kepler’s third law:

Page 12: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 12

Figure 14.18Galaxy Rotation Curve

Page 13: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 13

Mass of the Milky Way

• There is apparently more mass than can be seen.

• Unseen mass out to ~50 kpc.• Recall radius of observable Milky Way

is ~15 kpc.• Dark Matter

• Can detect gravitational effects• Cannot detect any other way.

Page 14: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 14

Dark Matter

• Is not atomic or molecular clouds - we would detect those using spectroscopy.

• Could be brown dwarfs or white dwarfs - very difficult to see.• MACHOs - MAssive Compact Halo Objects

• Could be exotic subatomic particles• WIMPs - Weakly Interacting Massive Particles

Page 15: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 15

Figure 14.19Gravitational Lensing

Page 16: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 16

What observations suggest the mass of the Galaxy goes much farther out than its visible disc?

A) the orbits of the open clusters in the disc

B) x-ray images of other galaxies' discs from Chandra

C) the rotation curve beyond 15kpc

D) 21 cm maps of the spiral arms

E) infrared observations of distant brown dwarfs

Page 17: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 17

What observations suggest the mass of the Galaxy goes much farther out than its visible disc?

A) the orbits of the open clusters in the disc

B) x-ray images of other galaxies' discs from Chandra

C) the rotation curve beyond 15kpc

D) 21 cm maps of the spiral arms

E) infrared observations of distant brown dwarfs

Page 18: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 18

Galaxy Masses

Page 19: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 19

Figure 16.4Galaxy Rotation Curves

Page 20: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 20

Galaxy Masses

• Galaxy masses determined from Newton’s modification to Kepler’s third law.

• Within the visible spiral, radial velocities (and masses) can be measured directly.

• Outside the visible spiral, observe multiple galaxy systems.• Only radial velocity determined with Doppler

shift.• Reliable statistical information from lots of

observation.

Page 21: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 21

Figure 16.5Galaxy Masses

• from Newton’s modification of Kepler’s law

Page 22: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 22

Galaxy Masses

• Galaxies apparently have invisible halos similar to the Milky Way.

• All contain 3-10 times the visible mass.

• Mass discrepancy is even greater for clusters of galaxies.

Page 23: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 23

Figure 16.6Dark Galaxy?

Page 24: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 24

Figure 16.7abGalaxy Cluster X-Ray Emission

• Intergalactic space is filled with superheated gas in this cluster.

Page 25: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 25

Figure 16.7cGalaxy Cluster X-Ray Emission

Page 26: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 26

Figure 16.8Head–Tail Radio Galaxy - Could this be a “wake” through intergalactic clouds?

Page 27: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 27

Extending the Distance Scale

• Variable Stars• Tully-Fisher Relationship• Supernovae• Cosmological Redshift

Page 28: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 28

Figure 14.7Variable Stars on Distance Ladder

• Greater distances can be determined than typically available through spectroscopic parallax, because these variables are so bright.

Page 29: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 29

Figure 15.12Local Group

Page 30: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 30

Tully-Fisher Relationship

Page 31: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 31

Figure 15.9Galactic “Tuning Fork”

• Galaxies are classified according to their shape (Hubble classification)• Elliptical• Spiral• Irregular

Page 32: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 32

Figure 15.10Galaxy Rotation

• Rotation rates can be determined using Doppler shift measurements• Blue shift indicates moving towards you• Red shift indicates moving away from you

Page 33: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 33

Tully-Fisher Relationship

• Rotation speed can be used to determine a galaxy’s total mass.

• A close correlation between rotation speed and total luminosity has been observed.

• Comparing (true) luminosity to (observed) apparent brightness allows us to determine distance

• Distance scale can be extended to ~200 Mpc.

Page 34: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 34

Figure 15.11Extragalactic Distance Ladder

Page 35: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 35

Supernovae

• Type II Supernovae • Are a result of a very massive star’s core

collapse• Can vary in brightness, since the cores

can vary in size.• Therefore, they are not a good distance

indicator.

Page 36: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 36

Supernovae

• Type I Supernovae • White dwarf, carbon detonation• Are a result of a white dwarf exceeding

its Chandrasekhar limit (1.4 Msolar).• They are all about the same size.• They are very good distance indicators

(Standard Candles).

Page 37: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 37

Standard Candles

• Standard Candles are easily recognizable astronomical objects whose luminosities are confidently known.• Term usually only refers to very luminous objects

• Type I supernovae• Other objects might include

• Rotating spiral galaxies• Cepheid variables• Main sequence stars

Page 38: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 38

Figure 15.11Extragalactic Distance Ladder

Page 39: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 39

Review Questions

Page 40: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 40

Which of these does not exist?

A) a .06 solar mass brown dwarf

B) a 1.3 solar mass white dwarf

C) a six solar mass black hole

D) a million solar mass black hole

E) a 3.3 solar mass neutron star

Page 41: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 41

Which of these does not exist?

A) a .06 solar mass brown dwarf

B) a 1.3 solar mass white dwarf

C) a six solar mass black hole

D) a million solar mass black hole

E) a 3.3 solar mass neutron star

Page 42: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 42

A star has an apparent magnitude of +1.0 and an absolute magnitude of +1.0. If the distance between Earth and the star increases, the apparent magnitude

would _____, and the absolute magnitude would _____.A) increase; decrease

B) decrease; increase

C) increase; not change

D) decrease; not change

E) not change; increase

Page 43: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 43

A star has an apparent magnitude of +1.0 and an absolute magnitude of +1.0. If the distance between Earth and the star increases, the apparent magnitude

would _____, and the absolute magnitude would _____.A) increase; decrease

B) decrease; increase

C) increase; not change

D) decrease; not change

E) not change; increase

Page 44: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 44

A star has apparent magnitude of +8.0 before it goes nova and increases its luminosity by 10,000 times. Its

apparent magnitude after it goes nova is.

A) +8.0

B) +18.0

C) -8.0

D) -2.0

E) +3.0

Page 45: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 45

A star has apparent magnitude of +8.0 before it goes nova and increases its luminosity by 10,000 times. Its

apparent magnitude after it goes nova is.

A) +8.0

B) +18.0

C) -8.0

D) -2.0

E) +3.0

Page 46: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 46

Using spectroscopic parallax, you find a star’s distance to be 76 parsecs. You now find out that the star isn’t a main

sequence star, but is a red giant. Your distance estimate is

A) too large

B) too small

C) fine - no significant change in estimate is needed.

Page 47: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 47

Using spectroscopic parallax, you find a star’s distance to be 76 parsecs. You now find out that the star isn’t a main

sequence star, but is a red giant. Your distance estimate is

A) too large

B) too small

C) fine - no significant change in estimate is needed.

Page 48: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 48

Which is correct?

1 - The new moon rises at noon.

2 - The first quarter moon rises at noon.

3 - The full moon rises at noon.

4 - The third quarter moon rises at noon.

Page 49: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 49

Which is correct?

1 - The new moon rises at noon.

2 - The first quarter moon rises at noon.

3 - The full moon rises at noon.

4 - The third quarter moon rises at noon.

Page 50: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 50

In Paris, France (50 degrees north latitude), what is the longest day of the year?

1: March 21

2: June 21

3: September 21

4: December 21

Page 51: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 51

In Paris, France (50 degrees north latitude), what is the longest day of the year?

1: March 21

2: June 21

3: September 21

4: December 21

Page 52: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 52

Where along the horizon does the Sun rise on June 21 in Paris, France?

1: Due east

2: North of east

3: South of east

4: Can’t tell with information given

Page 53: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 53

Where along the horizon does the Sun rise on June 21 in Paris, France?

1: Due east

2: North of east

3: South of east

4: Can’t tell with information given

Page 54: Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College1. Charles Hakes Fort Lewis College2

Charles HakesFort Lewis College 54

Three Minute Paper

• Write 1-3 sentences.• What was the most important thing

you learned today?• What questions do you still have

about today’s topics?