charter application development | washington state charter conference | may 2015
TRANSCRIPT
CHARTER APPLICATION DEVELOPMENT: A BLUEPRINT FOR A
HIGHLY EFFECTIVE SCHOOL
2015 WASHINGTON STATE CHARTER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION CONFERENCE
JASON SARSFIELD | VICE PRESIDENT, NCSI KATHERINE KLEITSCH | DIRECTOR OF SCHOOL DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS, WA CHARTERS
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Welcome, Introduction and Overview
2
Introductions
Overview of Requirements and Expectations
10 Common Pitfalls and Lessons Learned
Questions and Closing
1
2
3
4
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG3
Balance between Vision and Reality
“We want risk takers and entrepreneurial teams but not
those that are reckless, irresponsible or naïve.”
“Good ideas alone are not enough!”
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Inclusionary Discussion
5
• For people and teams that have developed an application and/or submitted one, what challenges have you faced?
• What important questions to you have about developing an application?
• Anything else we should know before we dig into the details?
Active Authorizing Bodies
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Requirements · Process · Expectations
7
Annual RFPs issued: Take advantage of the many
opportunities to learn more about the Commission’s
process and expectations directly from Commission
leadership and staff.
• Webinars
• Training Sessions
• Documents
• Ask questions and build relationships
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG8
Major Steps in the Application Process
- Letter of Intent
- Submission of Complete Application via Charter Tools
- Completeness Determination
- Evaluation by Local and National Reviewers
- Capacity Interviews
- Public Forum
- Evaluation Team Recommendation
- Commission Decision
Requirements · Process · Expectations
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG9
Primary Components of the Application
- Executive Summary
- Educational Program Design and Capacity
- Operations Plan and Capacity
- Financial Plan and Management Capacity
- CMO/Network Replication Information (if
applicable)
Requirements · Process · Expectations
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Priority Models for Spokane Public Schools (Portfolio Approach to Authorizing)
10
• Project Based & Montessori
• Workforce Development
• Language Immersion
• Core Knowledge
• Parent Co-Ops
• High School STEM
• Blended and Personalized Learning
• Cambridge
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
More on Spokane Public Schools Approach to Authorizing
11
• Specific needs for alleviating overcrowding and
increased options for the south side of Spokane
• Charter Compact and Collaboration
• Potential to Share Services/Costs
• Not offering facilities
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG 13
Superior Performance
Distinctive Impact
Lasting Endurance
What Is Greatness?
Building forBreakthrough
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #1
15
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG16
Applicants often lack demonstrated Instructional
Leadership.
- It is difficult for an authorizer to recommend
approval of a school without an identified
instructional leader
- Track Record (including the target population)
- Experience with the proposed educational model
- Structures to ensure the ability to focus on teaching
and learning
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #2
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG17
Prioritize – Focus – Stay Disciplined
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #3
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG18
Applicants often do not demonstrate how and why their
educational program will be effective with the target
population
Program Target Population Results
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #4
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #5
19
“Its like a dissertation!” Application are often poorly written
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG20
Applications are often misaligned, inconsistent and lack
cohesiveness
- Budget alignment (staffing, PD, enrollment,
programs, interventions, etc.)
- Describe how certain aspects of the program will
work together seamlessly
- Review specifically for consistency
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #6
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG21
Applicant teams often fail to ensure Team Synergy.
- Avoid “one man/woman show”
- Governing Board (not the same as a typical non-
profit organization)
- Clarity around organizational relationships and
lines of accountability
- Avoid the appearance of conflicts of interest
- Identify gaps in the team and explain how you’ll
address them
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #7
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
A Simple Way to Frame Roles
Governing Board
=
To Ensure
Management
=
To Execute
23
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG24
Applicants often have inadequate Financial Plans and
insufficient financial capacity.
- “Your budget is a manifestation of your mission”
- Start with your budget and work backward
- Lack of financial acumen (specifically related to
education)
- Lofty fundraising goals without demonstrated track
record or commitments
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #8
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #9
25
Applicants often fail to relentlessly prepare for the
Capacity Interview.
- Practice, practice, practice
- Know your application
- Demonstrate synergy
- Expect curveballs
- Remain humble and reflective
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG26
“Land the Plane” during the Interview
WWW.CHARTERINSTITUTE.ORG27
Applicants often fail to demonstrate their target community and
involve the community in the development of their application.
- Demonstrate an understanding of your target population
- Evidence why the community needs your school
- Describe how you solicited feedback and how it was
incorporated into your application
- Practice Covey’s first habit….Be Proactive!
- Solicit letters of support
Common Pitfalls and Lesson Learned #10
THANK YOU!
NATIONAL CHARTER SCHOOLS INSTITUTE | 711 WEST PICKARD STREET | MOUNT PLEASANT, MICHIGAN 48858
JASON [email protected]
KATHERINE [email protected]
WASHINGTON STATE CHARTER SCHOOL ASSOCIATION | 210 SOUTH HUDSON STREET | SEATTLE, WASHINGTON 98134