chehalis river basin flood district formation november 18, 2010 chehalis river basin flood district...
TRANSCRIPT
Preliminary Financial Issues /
AnalysisChehalis River Basin Flood District
FormationNovember 18, 2010
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 1
Multi-County “Flood District”
Lewis County FCZD
Grays Harbor County FCZD
Thurston County FCZD or
SWM
Chehalis TribeInterlocal
Agreement*
Defines:• Governance• Project
selection• Cost shares• Coordination
* Forms entity such as interlocal agency or joint authority
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 2
Multi-County Flood District could continue based on the terms of the interlocal agreement
or Multi-County Flood District could be
replaced by an independently governed multi-county flood control zone district◦ Legislation currently being drafted to allow for this
option
Options for the Future
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 3
Cost Recovery Options
Rates v. Taxes v. Assessments
What is the best combination of funding sources to use to recover Chehalis River Basin flood program costs in terms of equity, revenue sufficiency, reliability, ease of administration, and other factors?
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 4
Characteristics of Options
5Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation
Legal Constraints Practical Considerations Capital Operations
Taxes
- Ceiling of $0.50 / $1,000 AV without a public vote- May exceed with public vote- Must be applied uniformly
- Cannot be imposed on tax- exempt property- Can be "squeezed" by senior taxing entities
- Can be used for capital project(s), including: · Major flood control · Local / minor flood control · Stormwater facilities- Can support revenue bond or voted GO debt
- Can be used for operations, including: · Maintenance · Engineering · Repairs · Public education
Charges
- Those charged: · Must be contributing to runoff increase · Must be served or benefited by facilities
- Must be indirect nexus between services provided and amount charged- Basis of charging undefined (often impervious surface)
- Can be used for capital project(s) meeting nexus test, including: · Major flood control · Local / minor flood control · Stormwater facilities- Can support revenue bond debt
- Can be used for operations, including: · Maintenance · Engineering · Repairs · Public education
Assessments
- Capital only (not operations)- Can be applied only on specially benefited properties- Assessment limited to AV increase
- Adminstratively cumbersome- Diffi cult to demonstrate special benefit
- Can be used for capital project(s) that provide special benefit- Can support revenue bond debt
- Can not be used for operations
Each of the three counties reports that while $.50 / $1,000 AV is currently available against the $5.90 cap◦ 2010 taxable assessed value will likely decrease◦ Other tax levy rates will likely increase
Result: Possible compression not predictable at this time if $.50 / $1,000 AV will remain available
6
Tax Information
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation
7
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009Grays Harbor County 4,032,924,875$ 4,303,068,539$ 4,541,366,189$ 5,484,425,084$ 6,316,005,187$ 6,501,053,179$ Thurston County 17,300,000,000$ 19,900,000,000$ 23,500,000,000$ 28,810,000,000$ 30,117,000,000$ 29,249,000,000$ Lewis County 4,225,374,049$ 4,307,489,281$ 5,061,405,200$ 5,967,909,962$ 6,535,716,725$ 6,560,558,034$
$-
$5
$10
$15
$20
$25
$30
$35
2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009
Billi
ons
Total Taxable Assessed Value of Real Property by County
Grays Harbor County Thurston County Lewis County
Description Equitable Revenue Sufficiency Reliability Ease of
Admin
Taxes
Charges
Assessments
Cost Recovery Evaluation
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 8
Cost Recovery Questions
Does it make sense to recover some contribution of runoff related costs in a rate and other flood control benefit related costs in a tax and/or assessment?◦ RCW 86.15.160(4) authorizes charging rates “to
those who are receiving or will receive benefits from storm water control facilities and who are contributing to an increase in surface water runoff.”
If a rate is used, how would it be reconciled with existing local drainage utility rates?
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 9
Public Information: Education materials – flood proofing guidance
Regulation: Improve floodplain regulations, develop conservation easement programs
Planning and data collection: Improve hydraulic modeling, study woody debris and stream gravels
Reduce damage to existing structures: Develop home evaluation and buyout programs
Emergency response and preparedness: Develop early warning systems
Natural resources protection projects: Protect and restore riparian areas
List: Non-Structural Mitigation Measures
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation
10
Floodplain protection ◦ Culvert improvements, tributary drainage
improvements Bank protection
◦ Bank stabilization and protection Conveyance capacity
◦ Open channel migration zone
List: Structural Measures
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation
11
Cost Recovery Questions
Uniform v. Area-Specific Funding Does it make sense to recover costs
uniformly within the District by applying the same rate and/or tax throughout?
If a uniform approach is preferred, should revenue generated in one area of the Basin be in any way limited as far as where in the Basin it can be spent? If so, how should it be limited?
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 12
Cost Recovery Questions Does it make sense to charge different rates,
taxes, or assessments in different parts of the Basin depending on their specific needs? If so,◦ How many different areas and associated rates,
taxes, or assessments are appropriate?◦ Which types of costs should be allocated among
areas, e.g., operations and maintenance, capital?◦ How should those costs be allocated among areas?◦ What are the offsetting costs of implementation
and ongoing administration?
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 14
Related Fiscal Policy Issue How can the FCZD(s) protect its property
tax revenues, if used, given the fact that the $.50 per $1,000 tax rate authorization can be consumed by other, more senior, entities.
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 15
Sample Fiscal Policies What is an appropriate working capital
balance to maintain as a cushion against fluctuating expenditures, taking into account the size of the program and other factors?
How should capital repair and replacement be funded over time?
What is an appropriate level of capital contingency funding to maintain for emergency needs?
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 16
Sample Fiscal Policies What is an appropriate capital funding
strategy? When should debt be issued & by whom? When is a public vote necessary to issue debt?
If bonds are utilized, what is a prudent target coverage ratio to maximize fiscal health & allow for future debt issuance as needed?◦ Revenue bond issues are typically accompanied by
a coverage requirement of 1.25 or more◦ General obligation bonds usually do not require
coverage, however, such a target may be set by policy.
Chehalis River Basin Flood District Formation 17