chem2136labreport
TRANSCRIPT
Characterization of Unknowns by Means of Infrared, Proton,
Carbon, and UV/Vis Spectroscopy
Introduction:
Being able to identify the signature features that a compound possesses by different
means of spectroscopy is very important in determining if the desired compound has been
isolated. This is detrimental to not only the industry, but the research level as well. Every
molecular compound possesses features that can be characterized by different means of
spectroscopy due to their structure. UV/Vis spectroscopy is a tool that is capable of determining
the UV radiation frequencies within a molecule which shows details about the compound’s
structure. This is accomplished by matching UV frequencies with the conjugated double bonds
that reside in the compound. The UV/Vis matches the wavelength frequencies with the
absorption of this radiation. UV/Vis spectroscopy was used to only analyze unknown #3 due to
its dark red color. The solvent used to dissolve this unknown was methanol. To accomplish
characterizing this unknown by means of UV/Vis spectroscopy involved getting a cuvette of the
solvent to be used as a blank in the machine. Though this, a baseline reading was obtained to
compensate for the noise the blank caused. Nuclear magnetic resonance spectroscopy is very
versatile in determining what an unknown compound looks like. This technique operates by
displaying the elements located around hydrogen atoms. Proton NMR can be interpreted by the
determining the integral of the peaks, splitting of peaks, and the locations in the compound that
are shifted. NMR alone can be used to determine what an unknown compound may look like.
Lastly, Infrared spectroscopy was used to identify the specific functional groups within the
unknown compound. These functional groups vibrate at varying degrees and at varying
frequencies. This type of spectroscopy is useful, but not as detrimental as proton NMR. These
four different types of spectroscopy were used in determining the structures of unknowns 1-3.
Procedure:
Infrared spectroscopy was used to determine all unknown compounds. A background was
run before the unknowns were even tested, and this was done to ensure a correct reading. Once a
background was ran, the surface of the machine was wiped with methanol to ensure no substance
was on the crystal. After machine was cleaned, a small amount of sample was placed on the
crystal to being the infrared spectroscopy. Once infrared was successfully ran properly, surface
was again cleaned, and this process was repeated for the rest of the unknown compounds.
UV/Vis spectroscopy was only used for unknown 3 in this experiment. The solvent used for the
blank and the unknown was methanol. A quartz cuvette of the methanol blank, and the unknown
compound mixed with the methanol were both placed in the spectroscopy machine. The blank of
methanol was used to get a baseline reading. Before beginning the NMR spectroscopy for the
unknowns, a solubility test was needed in order to choose the right solvent for the corresponding
unknown. This was done by mixing 10 mg of each unknown with 5 mL of the corresponding
solvent for the test. The solvents tested include: DMSO, water, chloroform, and methanol. From
the solubility test, methanol was used for unknowns 1 and 3. Methanol did not dissolve unknown
2, so DMSO was used instead of methanol. Once the right solvents were chosen, around 5mL of
the solvent was mixed well with around 10 mg of the unknown compound. This mixture was
placed inside an NMR tube and then analyzed inside the NMR machine for 5 minutes. Carbon
NMR spectroscopy was done the exact same way as the proton NMR, but took a different
amount of time to complete analysis. Carbon NMR spectroscopy took around 19 hours to
complete, due to the amount of scans entered into the computer prior to beginning the NMR
sequence.
Results:
Before any spectroscopy could take place, a solubility test needed to be initiated in order
to dissolve to correct substance. Below is the table showing the solubility the unknowns had in
different solvents.
Unknown
Solvent 1 2 3
Water N N N
Methanol Y N Y
DMSO Y Y Y
Below is the table showing the degree of unsaturation for the unknown compounds:
Unknown 1 2 3
Molecular Formula C8H17N3 C10H16N2O8Na4 C20H12O5
Degree of
Unsaturation
2 4 15
Unknown #1:
Below are the IR, proton NMR, and carbon NMR for the first unknown compound.
(Figures 1, 2, 3)
Figure 1: Unknown#1 IR C
Structure Broad Curve C-H N-H N=C
Frequency 3000’s 3000 3100 1550
Figure 2: Unknown#1 Proton NMR C
Peak 1.2 1.5 2.2 5.0
Structure CH3 CH2 CH2 NH2
Figure 3: Unknown#1 Carbon NMR
1.2 1.5 1.5
5.0
2.2
PPM 140 60 50 41
Structure N=C=N CH2 N-CH3 CH2
Unknown#2:
Below are the IR, proton NMR, and carbon NMR for the second unknown compound.
(Figures 4, 5, 6)
Figure 4: Unknown#2 IR C
Structure COOH C=O C-H
Frequency 3300 1700 3000
Figure 5: Unknown#2 Proton NMR C
PPM 2.1 3.4 4.2
Structure OH CH2 CH2
Multiplicity Singlet Singlet Singlet
*Not triplets
2.1 3.4
4.2
Figure 6: Unknown#2 Carbon NMR
PPM 49 50 160
Structure CH2 CH2 COOH
Unknown#3:
Below are the IR, proton NMR, UV/Vis, and carbon NMR for the last unknown
compound. (Figures 7, 8, 9, 10)
49
50
160
Figure 7: Unknown#3 IR
Structure C=O C-H C-O-C Aromatic
Frequency 1700 3000 Broad 1750 1500
Figure 8: Unknown#3 UV/Vis C
Peak 270
Structure C=C conjugation
Figure 9: Unknown#3 Proton NMR C
PPM 6.5 4.9 7.7 8
Structure Aromatic H OH Aromatic H Aromatic H
Figure 10: Unknown#3 Carbon NMR
Discussion:
The structure of the first unknown was EDAC. The IR spectra showed a C=O bond at
1700, a C-H stretch at 3000, N-H stretch at 3100, and an N=C stretch at 1550. The proton NMR
shows a methyl peak at 1.2 and two methine peaks at 1.5 and 2.5 respectively. The peak at 1.2
points towards a methyl group due to chemical shifting. There are multiple peaks at 1.5 that
points to multiple methine groups in a chain. Lastly, the peaks at 2.5 point to methyl groups
directly attached to a nitrogen, again due to chemical shifting.
The structure of the second unknown was EDTA. The IR spectra for this unknown shows
a COOH stretch at 3300, a C=O stretch at 1700, and a N-H stretch at 3300. The proton NMR
shows a OH shift at 2.1, and methine shifts at 3.4 and 4.2 respectively. The shift at 2.1 is shown
in the alcohol groups at the end of each carboxylic acid in EDTA. The shift at 3.4 is shown as the
methine carbons connected to the nitrogen and carboxylic acid in EDTA. Lastly, the shift at 4.2
is shown in the structure as the two connected carbons between the nitrogens in EDTA. The
carbon NMR shows important shifts at 49, 50, and 160 ppm. The carbons at 49 ppm are the
carbons in the middle of EDTA between the two adjacent nitrogens. The carbons at 50 ppm are
the carbons connected between the nitrogen and the carbon of each of the four carboxylic acids
in EDTA. The carbons at 160 ppm are the carbons involved in the double bond of the carboxylic
acid.
The structure of the last unknown was fluorescein. The IR spectra shows frequencies at
1500, 1700, 3000, and 1750 which correspond to an aromatic stretch, C=O stretch, C-H stretch,
and ester stretch respectively. The IR spectra displayed more than one aromatic ring in the
molecule. The UV/Vis spectra showed the specified conjugation inside of the fluorescein
molecule. The proton NMR shows a peak at 4.9 and is shown in the alcohol group in the ring on
the far right of fluorescein. The peak at 6.5 is shown in the hydrogens attached to the ring on the
left of fluorescein, as well as the hydrogen on the ring on the right side of fluorescein. The peak
at 7.7 shows the hydrogens on the bottom ring of fluorescein due to the nearby acid. The last
peak at 8.0 is shown again in the bottom ring at the hydrogen connected to the acid. Since the
proton NMR displayed a significant amount of the molecule, all that was left was the carbon
NMR. The carbon NMR showed peaks mainly in the mid 100’s ppm, which correspond to
carbons inside a ring with a degree of conjugation. It also displayed carbons in the upper 100’s
ppm, which pointed towards a carbonyl, carboxylic acid, and a carbon attached to an alcohol.
Due to the saturation of the molecule, the carbon NMR displayed similar peaks for many
carbons.