chemistry – processing – material science · experiment shows the dramatic influence of the...

4
Volume 11 Magazine for the Polymer Industry Resins for silica tire treads PAHs in tires Active front spoiler system based on rubber ACN content and mechanical performance of HNBR RESEARCH – DEVELOPMENT – INNOVATION Chemistry – Processing – Material Science IN POLYMERS AND ELASTOMERS The Polymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH (PCCL) is the leading center for collaborative research in polymer technology and polymer science in Austria. We can also support our customers in the preparation of R&D activities, drawing on our extensive experience and knowledge of securing national and international funding opportunities. www.pccl.at

Upload: others

Post on 16-Mar-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Volume 11

Magazine for the Polymer Industry

Resins for silica tire treads

PAHs in tires

Active front spoiler system based on rubber

ACN content and mechanical performance of HNBR

RESEARCH – DEVELOPMENT – INNOVATION

Chemistry – Processing – Material Science

IN POLYMERS AND ELASTOMERS

The Polymer Competence Center Leoben GmbH (PCCL) is the leading center for collaborative research in polymer technology and polymer science in Austria. We can also support our customers in the preparation of R&D activities, drawing on our extensive experience and knowledge of securing national and international funding opportunities.

www.pccl.at

48 Volume 11

Pressure simulation for molding parts

Dipl.-Ing. Timo Gebauer

[email protected]

Executive Manager / CTO

Vanessa Schwittay

Marketing Manager & Engineering

Sigma Engineering GmbH, Aachen, Germany

Paper, DKT 2015, 29 June – 2 July 2015,

Nuremberg, Germany,

Deutsche Kautschuk-Gesellschaft e. V.,

Frankfurt, Germany

1 Introduction

The process simulation Sigmasoft Virtual Molding is already a well-established tool in the development phase of elastomer prod-ucts. It is used to prevent problems in production and to shorten the time to market of industrial applications. Already very early in the development phase runner systems can be balanced or mold temperatures optimized.

2 Simulation and reality

In spite of ongoing development and in-creasing complexity of the models it happens that the simulation results do not match the measurements at the machine. This does not only concern the simulated pressure, but also further results such as the filling behavior and many temperature related results because

of their correlation with pressure changes. Thus it becomes not only more diffi cult to decide whether the cavity fi lls as predicted, but also results as curing degree, mechanical properties of the part, material degradation, or warpage of the part may become less reli-able (fi g. 1).

If the phenomena observed at the ma-chine during serial production are not the same as the predicted values, major prob-lems can occur. Lost money, time delay, and frustrated customers are some of the conse-quences. The question now is why something like this happens and even more important how one can avoid problems like this.

3 The key factor cavity pressure

One of the key values during mold de-sign is the pressure needed to fi ll the cavity. The maximum pressure is one of the limiting factors for the machine selection. It is also

an indicator of the energy that heats up the elastomer during filling and is there-fore critical for the curing time prediction.

Pressure can be measured at various pos-itions in the system. Hydraulic pressure, pr-essure sensors in the piston or mold are the most common references for the pre-ssure. Usually only one reference is used. If the system offers more than one measured pressure the values are often contradictory.

Figure 2 shows the measured pressure at two different points in the gating sys-tem of an elastomer mold. Even though the hydraulic pressure is constant, the press-ure close to the machine (P-runner1) decr-eases at a certain point. In the first view it looks unphysical. What happened in this case is the hydraulic pressure also sees what happens in the piston. If the melt cushion becomes too small the flow beh-avior in this area can dramatically incr-ease the hydraulic pressure.

In the simulation pressure can be predict-ed at various positions as well. In addition the simulation is usually based on differe-nt models and ideal boundary conditions. Due to the selected model and assumptions for the process simulation results can vary. These variations are based on the complex interaction between material measuring errors, modeling and assumptions. There-fore results are often hard to judge.

One of the critical values for the predic-tion of pressure is the viscosity depending on shear rate and temperature. Unfort-unately there is no way to directly measure the viscosity. Depending on the system that is used, pressure or momentum are measured at specific conditions of flow.

Pressure prediction in elastomer moldsT. Gebauer, V. Schwittay

In spite of ongoing development of existing simulation models it happens that the simulation results do not always match the measurements taken at the actual ma-chine. An erroneous simulated pressure in the elastomer mold may critically affect other simulation results such as the predicted filling behavior of the form, the me-chanical properties of the component, or warpage of the finished part, as correlations between pressure changes and related temperature development exist. Errors in the predicted values could lead to serious problems in the serial production. The article gives a brief introduction to the measurement and simulation of pressure and an-swers various questions.

Fig. 1: Various results depend on the correct pressure prediction as curing degree (left) and material degradation (right)

Empty90.0087.5785.1482.7180.2977.8675.4373.0070.5768.1465.7163.2960.8658.4356.00

98,85

2.448e-010

Percent cured %Empty0.090050.083710.077370.071030.064690.052000.045660.039320.032980.026640.020300.013960.007620.00127

0.09005

0.001275

Degradation potential

90.966

65.747

51.710

91.783

90.094

60.355

47.425

91.025 YZ

XY

Z

X

Volume 11 49

Based on these values and several correcti-ons, the viscosity can be calculated. Since the setup of these systems is very sensitive the results can vary over a wide range. Especially for elastomer mixtures the variation in the viscosity measured can be more than 100%.

3.1 Measurement and correction problems

Figure 3 shows the result of three dif-ferent measurements for one mixture (one batch), measured at three different labora-tories. The diagram is plotted in logarithm scale. The viscosity measured at laboratory 3 is five times higher than the viscosity measured at laboratory 2. If these visco-sities are used in a simulation, the predict-ed pressure will be completely different for the three measurements.

One reason for the differences is the sensitivity of high pressure viscometers. Depending on how the elastomer is placed

in the machine and depending on the setup of the system the measured results can vary a lot.

Other effects are the various corrections which can be used to calculate the true vis-cosity (Weissenberg-Rabinowitsch, Moon-ey, Bagley). These corrections usually need a more complex setup or different experi-ments. Since every experiment has to be paid, not all of the corrections are done in every characterization.

3.2 Simulation of pressure and viscosity considering shear heating

In addition to the already complex prob-lem of known corrections, there is no cor-rection taking into account the temperature increase during the measurement. The ma-terial is pushed through a capillary with a high pressure. The higher pressure and veloc-ity are the higher the shear heating will be. Depending on the sensitivity of the viscosity

for temperature changes the real viscosity will be a lot higher than the measured vis-cosity. Figure 4 shows a virtual experiment. In this experiment a material with a certain viscosity (original viscosity) is used to sim-ulate a high pressure capillary viscometer. The simulated pressure is used to calculate the viscosity as it is done in the real experi-ment. The second curve (viscosity isotherm) shows the calculated viscosity based on this experiment. The material used to generate the viscosity was modifi ed in the simulation in a way that the temperature could not in-crease. One can see that both curves match pretty well. This proof of concept shows that the simulation of the capillary is very accurate and gives the correct pressure prediction.

A second simulation was performed. In this simulation the material was allowed to change temperature due to shear heating. Again the viscosity was calculat-ed. Figure 5 shows the original viscosity

Pres

sure

in b

ar

Hydraulic pressureP-runner1P-runner2

1 E+01

1 E+02

1 E+03

1 E+04

1 E+05

1 E+00 1 E+01 1 E+02 1 E+03 1 E+04 1 E+05

Visc

osit

y in

Pa·

s

Shear rate in s-1

Lab 1Lab 2Lab 3

1 E+00

1 E+01

1 E+02

1 E+03

1 E+04

1 E+05

1 E+06

1 E-01 1 E+00 1 E+01 1 E+02 1 E+03 1 E+04 1 E+05

Visc

osit

y in

Pa·

s

Shear rate in s-1

Viscosity isothermOriginal viscosity

Fig. 2: Hydraulic pressure and two pressure curves close to the gate (P-runner2) and close to the machine (P-runner1)

Fig. 3: Viscosity measured at three different laboratories

Fig. 4: Original viscosity and calculated viscosity for an isothermal material behavior

1 E+00

1 E+01

1 E+02

1 E+03

1 E+04

1 E+05

1 E+06

1 E-01 1 E+00 1 E+01 1 E+02 1 E+03 1 E+04 1 E+05

Visc

osit

y in

Pa·

s

Shear rate in s-1

Calculated viscosityOriginal viscosity

Fig. 5: Original viscosity and calculated viscosity for a normal material behavior

50 RFP 1/2016 – Volume 11

Report

(green curve) and the calculated viscosity (red curve) for this material. In the region of low shear rates the two curves match very well.

In these areas the shear heating is rather low so the material does not heat up too much. In the region of higher shear rates the distance between the two curves becomes bigger. At a shear rate of 1,000/s the difference between the two curves is

approximately a factor of 2. This simple

experiment shows the dramatic influence of the temperature increase during the viscosity measurement. To predict the pressure loss in an elastomer mold it is necessary to also correct this behavior.

One way to get the real viscosities is a simulation. Sigmasoft Virtual Molding can be used to find the real viscosity taking the temperature increase into account.

4 Conclusion

This short introduction in measuring and simulating pressure shows that there are vari-ous questions that have to be answered in detail before the simulation result will match the measured pressure. It is not always nec-essary to answer all of these questions but it is important to be aware of the infl uence of certain effects. This will make sure that critical values can be avoided in production.

Publication information & contacts

Reference to common names, trade names, names of goods, etc., does not warrant the assumption that such names are unrestricted and may therefore be used by anyone. Legally protected registered trademarks are often involved, even if these are not expressly shown as such.

Subscriptions, terms of receipt and delivery:Annual subscription fee EUR 120 (4 issues per year, incl. delivery costs). Single issue EUR 25 (domestic fees are understood as inclusive of the appropriately valid value added tax). Orders are accepted by the publisher and all national and international book shops. Taking up of a new subscription applies initially for the current calendar year. The subscription is automatically renewed if it is not cancelled in writing six weeks before the end of the calendar year. The sub-scription fees are invoiced each year in advance and, when participating in direct debit payment, they will be debited automatically. Should the magazine not be delivered due to reasons that are outside our control, there is no right to claim later delivery or reimbursement of subscription fees already paid in advance. The legal domicile for trading is Ratingen, which also applies for all other purposes, insofar as claims for payment are to be enforced.

Copyright and publisher’s rights:Articles signed with the author’s name or signature do not necessarily represent the editor’s opinion. Unrequested manuscripts will only be returned if return postage is provided. The publisher requires that the author possesses copyright and rights for use of all constituents of the material submitted, namely also for pictures and tables, etc which are also submitted. With acceptance of the manuscript, the right to publication, translation, re-prints, electronic storage in databanks, additional printing, photocopying and microfiche copying is transferred to the publisher. The ma-gazine and all its contributions and pictures are protected by copyright. All use beyond the limits established by the law on author’s copyright is not permitted without approval of the publisher.

PublisherDr. Heinz B. P. Gupta

AddressDr. Gupta VerlagAm Stadion 3b, 40878 Ratingen, GermanyVAT No. DE 157894980

Postal addressP. O. Box 10 13 30, 40833 Ratingen, Germany

Tel. +49 2102 9345-0Fax +49 2102 9345-20

E-mail [email protected]

Internet www.rfp-international.com

EditorsDr. Ernst Debie (Editor-In-Chief)Dr. Stephanie Waschbüsch (Vice Editor-In-Chief) Dr. Heinz B. P. GuptaDr. Isabella KappnerDipl.-Biol. Markus Linden

in memoriam Dipl.-Chem. Frank A. Gupta †

FreelancersDr. Stefan Albus (ALS)Jiri G. Drobny (JD)David Shaw (DS)Dr. Horst-E. Toussaint (HET)David Vink (DV)

Editorial assistantPatrizia SchmidtTel. +49 2102 9345-12

Advertisement Indira Gupta, Julian BäumerTel. +49 2102 9345-15

SubscriptionNoemi JägerTel. +49 2102 9345-0

LayoutUlrich Gewehr, Max GodenrathTel. +49 2102 9345-18

Frequency of publication4 issues 2016Post distribution no. 73484ISSN 1863-7116

Bank accountsDeutsche Postbank AGIBAN DE51 3601 0043 0516 1584 31BIC PBNKDEFF

Commerzbank DüsseldorfIBAN DE95 3004 0000 0858 7982 00BIC COBADEFFXXX

Our technical magazines and books create your expertise

P. O. Box 10 13 30 · 40833 Ratingen/Germany · www.gupta-verlag.com Tel. +49 2102 9345-0 · Fax +49 2102 9345-20

69. Jahrgang, Januar 2016

01| 2016

Fachmagazin für die Polymerindustrie

Weltautomarkt 2016

Kostenoptimierung im Mischsaal

Drucksimulation Formteilfertigung

Elastomere im Ölfeld

Kuraray Liquid Rubber (K-LR) is a reactive plasticizer based on isoprene and/or butadiene. K-LR is colorless, transparent and almost odorless. Also K-LR has very low VOC values.

Applications: Rubber goods, Adhesives, Sealants, Coatings and others.

tire technology EXPO 2016Visit Us: Hall 19/20

Booth C218

Chinaplas 2016Visit Us: Hall N1/Booth G01

Visit our new website:

www.elastomer.kuraray.com

FO

RU

M F

ÜR

DIE

PO

LYU

RE

TH

AN

IND

US

TR

IE

PU MAGAZIN

www.pu-magazin.de

01/2016 Januar

Nano-Aramidfaserverstärkte PU-SchäumeWeltautomarkt 2016

Reaktive Schmelzklebstoffe

Additive für emissionsarme Weichschaumstoffe

Simulation von Schaumspritzgießprozessen

Wir sorgen für den optimalen Mix!

Perfekt abgestimmt, optimal dosiert, beste

Ergebnisse. Mit innovativer FRIMO Technologie

setzen Sie Maßstäbe bei der PUR Verarbeitung.

Vertrauen Sie auf die Kompetenz des Technologie-

Spezialisten.

FRIMO Group GmbH | Tel.: +49 (0) 5404 886 - 0 | [email protected]

www.frimo.com

PURe Kompetenz Entwicklung

Werkzeuge/Werkzeugträger

Stationär-/Mobilanlagen

Misch-/Dosiermaschinen

Service

JEC Composites Paris, 08.–10.03 2016, Pavillon 5A M54VDI Tagung Mannheim, 09.–10.03.2016, Stand 1

06/2015 DECEMBER/JANUARY

PO

LYU

RE

TH

AN

ES

MA

GA

ZIN

E I

NT

ER

NA

TIO

NA

L

Interview with J. MacCleary, Covestro

CPI Polyurethanes Technical Conference review

Spray polyurethane foam

Reactive catalysts

www.pu-magazine.com

Additives for low-emission foams

Growing Industry Recognition for Solstice® LBA

Solstice® LBA|

Honeywell is proud to accept the 2015 Polyurethane Innovation Award from CPI and BuildingGreen’s Top 10 Green Building Products of 2015 award. Accolades for Honeywell Solstice® Liquid Blowing Agent continue to pour in. Innovation is at the core of Honeywell, and we’ll continue to lead the way.

Learn more at honeywell-solsticelba.com or 800-631-8138.

© 2015 Honeywell International Inc. All rights reserved.

4| 2015

Volume 7, November 2015

PTS-THERMOFLEX®-TPS

PTS-UNIPRENE®-TPV

DESMOFLEX®

high tech TPU-Blend

PTS Plastic-Technologie-Service,

Marketing und Vertriebs GmbH

Hautschenmühle 3

91587 Adelshofen/Tauberzell

Germany

Fon +49-(0)9865-821

Fax +49-(0)9865-720

[email protected]

www.pts-marketing.de

The PTS group – Your materials specialist

in hard/soft combinations,

crosslinkable thermoplastics and

high-performance compounds.

lightweight tpu foam for footwear

bio-based succinate polyester polyols in tpu

organomodified siloxanes

co2 laser cutting

Volume 10, October 2015

04| 2015

Magazine for the Polymer Industry

Rubber and greenhouse effect

Sulphenamides and network structure

Ultra-clear silicone

Optimising tear resistance

Compound development

PlasticizersProcessing Aids, ActivatorsSilanes, DesiccantsAntitack AgentsHeat Transfer Fluids

As your reliable partner we are available when problems arise to provide immediate technical support and customer service. An uncompromising desire to meet your demands motivates each and every one of our team.

Kettlitz-Chemie GmbH & Co. KGIndustriestr. 6, 86643 Rennertshofen (Germany) Telefon +49 8434 9402-0, Fax +49 8434 [email protected], www.kettlitz.com

Contact us to learn more about subscriptions, advertising opportunities, editorial specials … [email protected]

Visit us at:

Tire Technology Expo 2016 16 – 18 February 2016Hall 19/20, stand C720

Chinaplas 2016 25 – 28 April 2016Hall N2, stand N2Q07

K 2016 19 – 26 October 2016Rubber Street