chemistry of groundwater influenced by geogenic ... · • high levels of fluoride in drinking...

69
Chemistry of groundwater influenced by geogenic & anthropogenic contamination Sudhakar M. Rao, Department of Civil Engineering and Centre for Sustainable Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

Upload: others

Post on 17-Oct-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • Chemistry of groundwater influenced by geogenic & anthropogenic

    contamination

    Sudhakar M. Rao, Department of Civil Engineering and Centre for Sustainable

    Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore

  • Sudhakar Rao-IISc

    Water Resources In India

    Total Water Availability

    1869 BCM

    Surface Water

    Availability 690 BCM

    14 Major River Basins

    Ground Water

    Availability 432 BCM

    68% remains untapped

  • Sudhakar Rao-IISc

    Domestic & Industrial use

    70 BCM

    Agriculture

    330 BCM

    Replenishable Ground Water

    Resource

    432 BCM

  • Quality

    deterioration

    Domestic pollution

    Agricultural pollution

    Industrial pollution

    Geogenic contamination

    Disposal of

    wastes, leaching of

    sewer

    materials,e

    tc.

    Leaching

    of nutrients, pesticides,

    fertilisers,

    etc.

    Disposal of

    effluents in streams or

    on land

    Arsenic

    Fluoride

    Iron

    Hardness

    Salinity

  • Nature of

    quality problem

    Number of

    affected

    habitations

    Approximate

    population at

    risk (million)

    Affected regions

    Excess Arsenic

    (0.05-3.2 mg/L)

    5,029 25 79 blocks of 8 districts (Bardhaman, Hoogli, Howrah, Malda, Murshidabad, Nadia,

    North and South 24 Parganas) of West Bengal, parts of Bhojpur and Patna districts

    of Bihar and Ballia district of Uttar Pradesh, parts of Rajnandgaon district of

    Chhattisgarh and parts of Assam

    Excess Fluoride

    (1.5-48 mg/L)

    36,988 71 (a) Kerala, Jammu & Kashmir, West Bengal, Orissa, Assam, Bihar and Delhi with

    less than 30 per cent of the districts affected.

    (b) Punjab, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,

    Chattisgarh and Maharashtra with 30-70 per cent of the districts affected.

    (c) Rajasthan, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh with 70-100 per cent of the districts

    affected.

    Excess Iron (1-

    20mg/L)

    1,38,670

    - Prevalent mostly in hilly regions, parts of Assam, Agartala, Bihar, Orissa,

    Rajasthan, Tripura, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Maharashtra, Madhya

    Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Tamilnadu and Kerala.

    Excess Nitrate

    (50-1000 mg/L)

    13,958 842.54 Parts of Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chandigarh,

    Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Kerala, Orissa, Jammu &

    Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh

    Excess Salinity

    (Inland and

    coastal)

    (2000-27000

    mg/L)

    32,597 - Inland salinity: Inland salinity in ground water is caused due to geogenic sources.

    The problem of inland salinity has been observed in arid and semi arid regions of

    Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab, and Gujarat with limited extent in the states of Uttar

    Pradesh, Delhi, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Tamilnadu.

    Electrical conductivity in these areas exceeds 4000 micro Siemens/ cm.

    Coastal salinity: Problem of coastal salinity in ground water that is caused due to

    excessive exploitation of ground water has been observed in Mangrol - Chorwad

    areas and Coastal Saurashtra of Gujarat, Minjur area in Tamilnadu, Pondicherry

    coast, parts of Orissa, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala coast.

    Other reasons

    (Heavy metals,

    Pesticides,

    Fertilizers, etc.)

    25,092 - Parts of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh,

    Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab,

    Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and NCT of Delhi

    Total 2,52,334

  • Sl.No Nature of Quality Problem

    No. Habitations affected

    1 Excess Fluoride 36,988

    2 Excess Arsenic 3533

    3 Excess Salinity 32,597

    4 Excess Iron 138,670

    Geogenic Contamination

  • Areas of Focus

    Water Quality

    Impact of geogenic stresses on groundwater bodies

    Impact of anthropogenic stresses on ground water

    bodies

  • Why is fluoride in drinking water an environmental problem ?

    • High levels of fluoride in drinking water ( > 1.5 mg/L ) leads to dental and skeletal fluorosis.

    • Problem is severe where ground water is the major source of drinking water.

    • Indian standard specifies ( IS 10500: 1991) desirable and permissible limits of fluoride in drinking water as 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L.

  • Fluoride concentration in 15 districts of Karnataka

    27.87

    44.92

    13.77

    7.54 4.26 3.93

    0

    10

    20

    30

    40

    50

    60

    Pe

    rce

    nt

    1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-8

    Fluoride concentration (mg/L)

    Occurrence in GW

  • Physical Features of Karnataka

    Total Geographical Area = 1,92,000 sq.kms.

    Forms part of the Deccan plateau.

    The Coastal plain:

    320 km long and

    between 13 and 65

    km wide

    Western mountain range:

    Elevations range from 1500

    m to1900 m

    The Northern Plains:

    Entirely a plateau and

    ranges between 400

    to 600 m

    Southern Plains:

    Entirely a plateau

    and rugged

  • Most part of the State is underlained by

    crystalline rocks such as gneisses,

    granites, schists, basalts, charnokites and

    small portion of coastal area is having

    alluvium.

    Major portion of the State is underlained

    by crystalline basement aquifers and small

    portion of the coastal area and narrow

    strip of river courses are occupied by

    deltaic and alluvial valley fills.

    The crystalline rocks do not have primary

    porosity.

    The weathered and fractured horizons act

    as the water bearing zones and supply

    water to wells and bore wells.

    The thickness of the weathered zone

    extends from a few meters to as much as

    30m depending on the rock formation and

    topography.

    The weathered horizon is followed by

    fractured zone which extends upto 150m

    in some areas.

    Hydrogeology

  • Rainfall

    Average annual rainfall in the

    state is 1138 mm spread over

    55 rainy days.

    Varies from as low as 569 mm

    in the Northern plains to as

    high as 4029 mm in the

    Western costal area.

    About 2/3rd of the geographical

    area (comprising of the

    Northern and Southern plains)

    of the State receives less than

    750 mm of rainfall (semi-arid).

  • Limited surface water resources and

    erratic rainfall has increased the

    dependence on the groundwater

    resources.

    Exploitation of ground water in the dry

    Northern and Southern plains is

    higher as compared to Coastal and

    Western mountain range regions.

    More than 3 lakh dug-wells have

    dried, shallow bore wells have failed

    and yield in deep bore wells are

    declining.

    Area irrigated by ground water

    extraction structures is decreasing.

    More than Rs.2000 crores invested

    by individual farmers on dug wells,

    pumpsets and other developmental

    works have become infructuous.

    Districts with overdeveloped groundwater utilization

    Status of Groundwater Exploitation

  • 28%

    32%

    19%

    21%

    Fluoride

    Iron

    Nitrate

    Brackishness

    Habitations affected by groundwater

    quality problems

    Status of Groundwater

    Contamination

  • Kolar District

    No.of

    Station

    Analyzed

    Fall (m) ) with No.of stations

    and percentage Total

    Rise (m) with No.of stations and

    percentage Total

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    37 10 27 10 27 8 21.6 76 8 21.6 1 2.7 0 0 24.3

    The groundwater levels in 76% of the observation wells monitored by

    CGWB show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to

    corresponding period of last 10 years.

    Dark and grey taluks

    13.60%2.91%

    26.86%

    8.52%

    48.10% FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected

    Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 5.2m

  • Tumkur District

    No.of

    Station

    Analyzed

    Fall (m) ) with No.of stations

    and percentage Total

    Rise (m) with No.of stations and

    percentage Total

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    20 11 55 3 15 5 25 95 0 0 1 5 0 0 5

    The ground water levels in 95% of the observation wells monitored by CGWB

    show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to

    corresponding period of last 10 years.

    Dark and grey taluks

    12.00%

    27.17%

    17.80%10.67%

    32.37%FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected

    Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 5.96 m

  • Chitradurga District

    No.of

    Station

    Analyzed

    Fall (m) ) with No.of stations

    and percentage Total

    Rise (m) with No.of stations and

    percentage Total

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    0-2

    (m) %

    2-4

    (m) %

    >4

    (m) %

    14 7 50 3 21.4 1 7.1 79 3 21.4 0 0 0 0 21.4

    The groundwater levels in 79% of the observation wells monitored by CGWB

    show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to groundwater

    levels corresponding period of last 10 years.

    37.91%

    6.36%9.20%25.20%

    21.33% FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected

    Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 8.44 m

    Dark and grey taluks

  • Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci

  • Granitic and gneissic rocks underlie the study area.

    The faults and fractures in these rock formations are occupied by fluoride bearing minerals.

    Common fluorine bearing minerals are fluorite, apatite, amphiboles, cryolite and micas that tend to occur in crystalline (granite, granitic gneiss) and sedimentary (limestone, sandstone) rocks

    Fluoride from these minerals leaches to the

    groundwater.

    GW Chemistry

  • GW Chemistry

  • GW Chemistry

  • GW Chemistry

  • Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Tumkur

    Gibb’s diagram

  • Kolar

    Gibb’s diagram

  • Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Kolar

  • Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Tumkur

  • Nexus between groundwater quality and sanitation practice

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    28

  • Problem Statement

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    29

  • Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    30

  • Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    31

  • Groundwater serves as a decentralized source of “safe drinking water” for millions of rural and urban people. It accounts for nearly 80 per cent of the rural domestic water needs, and 50 per cent of the urban water needs of the country.

    Kumar and Shah 2004, Groundwater contamination

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    32

  • • Sources going dry or lowering of the ground water table.

    • Sources becoming quality affected. • Systems outliving their lives. • Systems working below rated capacity due to poor operation and maintenance. • Increase in population resulting into lower per capita availability. • Emergence of new habitations. • Acute seasonal shortages • Over-exploitation of resources

    Issues Impacting SGWM in Indian Context:

    Report of Working group on 11th Plan for DDWS 2007-2012 Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    33

    http://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdf

  • 63% of the urban population in India has got access to sewerage and sanitation facilities (47% from sewer and 53% from low cost sanitation) as on March 2004. As a consequence, open defecation is prevalent widely in rural areas but also significantly in urban

    areas too.

    Sanitation coverage

    11th Plan Document on Drinking Water Supply & Sanitation

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    34

    http://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XIPlan_BHARATNIRMAN.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XIPlan_BHARATNIRMAN.pdf

  • Case study

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    35

  • Background & Scope

    36

    The population is 60,000 and supply is ~ 5 MLD and entirely through GW.

    To develop a sustainable water management plan towards the future needs.

    To efficiently manage the groundwater resources in terms of quantity &

    quality.

    Geochemical & Microbiological surveys were performed simultaneously.

    .

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    36

  • Karnataka State

    Mulbagal Town

    Groundwater Management

    under IUWM

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    37

  • Table 5: Bore-well details of pump-house series

    Pump-house series Supplying bore-wells

    Seeganahalli pump house (SPH) M-101, M-107, M-108, M-110, M-200

    Kalikamba pump house (KPH) M-202, M-203, M-204, M-205, M-206, M-

    207, M-209 , M-210

    Someshwarapalya pump house (SOPH) M-304, M-305, M-306, M-308, M-309, M-

    310, M-316, M-317

    Busal Kunte pump house (BPH) M-111, M-217, M-221

    RMC pump house (RMCPH) M-237, M-239, M-240, M-242

    The remainder 47 bore-wells contribute to the Inner town series. These bore-well numbers are: M-114, M-115, M-116, M-117, M-118, M – 119, M – 120, M-121, M-122, M-123, M-124, M – 225, M-226, M-227, M-228, M-229, M-230, M-231, M- 233, M-234, M-235, M-236, M-244, M-245, M-300, M-312, M-313, M-314, M-400, M-401, M-402, M – 403, M-404, M-405, M-406, M-407, M-408, M-410, M-411, M-412, M-413, M-414, M- 415, M-417, M-419, M-421 and M-422 respectively.

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    38

  • Cation/Anion balance

    -8

    -7

    -6

    -5

    -4

    -3

    -2

    -1

    0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    8

    1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

    Sample number

    Cati

    on

    /An

    ion

    Bala

    nce

    Cation/Anion balance

    28.4.09 samples

  • 0

    50

    100

    150

    200

    250

    300

    350

    400

    450

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

    Nit

    rate

    , mg

    /L

    BW No.

    ITS OTS

    Permissible limit =45 ppm

  • 0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

    MP

    N/1

    00

    mL

    BW No.

    Total Coliforms

    ITS OTSColiform organisms should not bedetectable in 100 ml of any two

  • 0

    200

    400

    600

    800

    1000

    1200

    1400

    1600

    1800

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

    MP

    N/1

    00

    mL

    BW No.

    E. Coli

    ITSOTS

    No sample should contain E. Coli in 100 ml;

  • 0

    500

    1000

    1500

    2000

    2500

    0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

    TDS,

    mg

    /L

    BW No.

    ITS

    OTS

    Permissible limit = 2000 mg/L

    Desirable limit = 500 mg/L

  • 0

    1

    2

    3

    4

    5

    6

    7

    0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00

    NO

    3, m

    eq

    /l

    TZ-, meq/l

  • 4

    4.5

    5

    5.5

    6

    6.5

    7

    7.5

    8

    0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4

    pH

    Anion/Cation

  • Geochemical classification & Mechanisms

  • 0

    2

    4

    6

    8

    10

    12

    14

    16

    18

    20

    22

    24

    26

    28

    30

    10 100 1000 10000

    EC, micromhos/cm

    SA

    R

    10 100 1000 10000

    ITS PHS

    C1, low C2 medium

    C3 medium-highC4high

    C5

    V. high

    C1-S1C2-S1

    C3-S1

    C4-S1

    C4-S2

    Classification-USDA

  • Aquachem software

  • 5

    2

    6

    1

    3

    2

    1CaHCO3 type

    2NaCl type

    3 Mixed CaNaHCO3

    4Mixed CaMgCl

    5CaCl type

    6NaHCO3 type

    4

    Hydrochemical facies GroundWater Chart Calibration Plots-USGS Software

  • 1CaHCO3 type

    2NaCl type

    3 Mixed CaNaHCO3

    4Mixed CaMgCl

    5CaCl type

    6NaHCO3 type

    4

    1 2

    6

    3

    5

    Hydrochemical facies Hydrochemical facies

    GroundWater Chart Calibration Plots-USGS Software

  • 1

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

    Cl/Cl+HCO3

    TD

    S,

    mg

    /L

    Rock weathering

    dominance

    Evapo-

    crystallization

    dominance

    Atmospheric

    precipitation

    dominance

    PHS series

    Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram

  • Gibb's chart

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

    Na/Na+Ca

    TD

    S, m

    g/L

    Rock weathering

    dominance

    Evapo-

    crystallization

    dominance

    Atmospheric

    precipitation

    dominance

    Geochemical mechanisms

    PHS

    Gibb’s diagram

  • 1

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

    Cl/Cl+HCO3

    TD

    S, m

    g/L

    Rock weathering

    dominance

    Evapo-

    crystallization

    dominance

    Atmospheric

    precipitation

    dominance

    ITS series

    Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram

  • Gibb's chart, ITS

    1

    10

    100

    1000

    10000

    100000

    0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1

    Na/Na+Ca

    TD

    S, m

    g/L

    Rock weathering

    dominance

    Evapo-

    crystallization

    dominance

    Atmospheric

    precipitation

    dominance

    `

    Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram

  • 0

    0.5

    1

    1.5

    2

    2.5

    3

    3.5

    4

    4.5

    5

    0 10 20 30 40 50 60

    Sample Number

    F, m

    g/L

    ITS Mulbagal

    PHS Mulbagal

    Kolar - Tumkur Series

    F Distribution

  • SI=logIAP-logKsp

    SI= 0, Mineral is in equilibrium SI> 0, Solution is over-saturated with mineral SI

  • Samp

    le No.

    Ca, moles/l HCO3,

    moles/l

    IAP log

    IAP

    Ksp log

    Ksp

    SITheoretic

    al

    1 0.0007734 0.0028 2.17E-06 -5.66 1*10-8

    -8 2.34

    2 0.0045908 0.0084 3.85E-05 -4.41 1*10-8

    -8 3.59

    3 0.0061377 0.0072 4.42E-05 -4.35 1*10-8

    -8 3.65

    4 0.0058882 0.0063 3.72E-05 -4.43 1*10-8

    -8 3.57

    5 0.0049650 0.0067 3.31E-05 -4.48 1*10-8

    -8 3.52

    6 0.0028942 0.0065 1.87E-05 -4.73 1*10-8

    -8 3.27

    7 0.0033183 0.0074 2.47E-05 -4.61 1*10-8

    -8 3.39

    8 0.0035678 0.0041 1.46E-05 -4.84 1*10-8

    -8 3.16

    9 0.0011227 0.0032 3.59E-06 -5.45 1*10-8

    -8 2.55

    Calculations of SI calcite from Ca and HCO3 concentrations. Excel calculations

  • Source: http://www.sswm.info)

    Pathogens: Bacteria (0.4 to 2.5μ) and viruses (0.01 to 0.25 μ)

    Most nitrogen is excreted as urea, which readily degrades to ammonium. Nitrate is formed by the sequential, microbially-catalysed oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and then to nitrate

    Biologically active layer : removes pathogens and reduces porosity

    Ben Cave and Pete Kolsky 1999, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    66

    Pit latrine, ventilated improved pit latrine and pour flush toilets.

    http://www.sswm.info/

  • Pathogen movement and removal by soil Bacteria travel depends on velocity of groundwater flow. During travel, fraction die or retained (adsorbed or screened) on soil matrix. Key factor for removal of bacteria and viruses from groundwater: effluent residence time between contamination source and point of water abstraction. Unsaturated zone is most important line of defence against faecal pollution of aquifer as it is less permeable Probable survival time for coliforms in anaerobic groundwater environment is 4-7 days.

    Ben Cave and Pete Kolsky 1999, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    67

  • E Coli Attenuation

    One log removal of E Coli needed 4 m of decline in groundwater level

    Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,

    68

  • Thank You