chemistry of groundwater influenced by geogenic ... · • high levels of fluoride in drinking...
TRANSCRIPT
-
Chemistry of groundwater influenced by geogenic & anthropogenic
contamination
Sudhakar M. Rao, Department of Civil Engineering and Centre for Sustainable
Technologies, Indian Institute of Science, Bangalore
-
Sudhakar Rao-IISc
Water Resources In India
Total Water Availability
1869 BCM
Surface Water
Availability 690 BCM
14 Major River Basins
Ground Water
Availability 432 BCM
68% remains untapped
-
Sudhakar Rao-IISc
Domestic & Industrial use
70 BCM
Agriculture
330 BCM
Replenishable Ground Water
Resource
432 BCM
-
Quality
deterioration
Domestic pollution
Agricultural pollution
Industrial pollution
Geogenic contamination
Disposal of
wastes, leaching of
sewer
materials,e
tc.
Leaching
of nutrients, pesticides,
fertilisers,
etc.
Disposal of
effluents in streams or
on land
Arsenic
Fluoride
Iron
Hardness
Salinity
-
Nature of
quality problem
Number of
affected
habitations
Approximate
population at
risk (million)
Affected regions
Excess Arsenic
(0.05-3.2 mg/L)
5,029 25 79 blocks of 8 districts (Bardhaman, Hoogli, Howrah, Malda, Murshidabad, Nadia,
North and South 24 Parganas) of West Bengal, parts of Bhojpur and Patna districts
of Bihar and Ballia district of Uttar Pradesh, parts of Rajnandgaon district of
Chhattisgarh and parts of Assam
Excess Fluoride
(1.5-48 mg/L)
36,988 71 (a) Kerala, Jammu & Kashmir, West Bengal, Orissa, Assam, Bihar and Delhi with
less than 30 per cent of the districts affected.
(b) Punjab, Haryana, Madhya Pradesh, Karnataka, Uttar Pradesh, Tamil Nadu,
Chattisgarh and Maharashtra with 30-70 per cent of the districts affected.
(c) Rajasthan, Gujarat and Andhra Pradesh with 70-100 per cent of the districts
affected.
Excess Iron (1-
20mg/L)
1,38,670
- Prevalent mostly in hilly regions, parts of Assam, Agartala, Bihar, Orissa,
Rajasthan, Tripura, West Bengal, Uttar Pradesh, Punjab, Maharashtra, Madhya
Pradesh, Chhattisgarh, Jharkhand, Tamilnadu and Kerala.
Excess Nitrate
(50-1000 mg/L)
13,958 842.54 Parts of Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal, Rajasthan, Madhya Pradesh, Chandigarh,
Punjab, Haryana, Delhi, Bihar, Maharashtra, Karnataka, Kerala, Orissa, Jammu &
Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Gujarat, Tamil Nadu and Andhra Pradesh
Excess Salinity
(Inland and
coastal)
(2000-27000
mg/L)
32,597 - Inland salinity: Inland salinity in ground water is caused due to geogenic sources.
The problem of inland salinity has been observed in arid and semi arid regions of
Rajasthan, Haryana, Punjab, and Gujarat with limited extent in the states of Uttar
Pradesh, Delhi, Karnataka, Maharashtra, Madhya Pradesh and Tamilnadu.
Electrical conductivity in these areas exceeds 4000 micro Siemens/ cm.
Coastal salinity: Problem of coastal salinity in ground water that is caused due to
excessive exploitation of ground water has been observed in Mangrol - Chorwad
areas and Coastal Saurashtra of Gujarat, Minjur area in Tamilnadu, Pondicherry
coast, parts of Orissa, Andhra Pradesh and Kerala coast.
Other reasons
(Heavy metals,
Pesticides,
Fertilizers, etc.)
25,092 - Parts of Andhra Pradesh, Assam, Bihar, Goa, Gujarat, Haryana, Himachal Pradesh,
Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Maharashtra, Meghalaya, Orissa, Punjab,
Rajasthan, Tamil Nadu, Uttar Pradesh, West Bengal and NCT of Delhi
Total 2,52,334
-
Sl.No Nature of Quality Problem
No. Habitations affected
1 Excess Fluoride 36,988
2 Excess Arsenic 3533
3 Excess Salinity 32,597
4 Excess Iron 138,670
Geogenic Contamination
-
Areas of Focus
Water Quality
Impact of geogenic stresses on groundwater bodies
Impact of anthropogenic stresses on ground water
bodies
-
Why is fluoride in drinking water an environmental problem ?
• High levels of fluoride in drinking water ( > 1.5 mg/L ) leads to dental and skeletal fluorosis.
• Problem is severe where ground water is the major source of drinking water.
• Indian standard specifies ( IS 10500: 1991) desirable and permissible limits of fluoride in drinking water as 1.0 and 1.5 mg/L.
-
Fluoride concentration in 15 districts of Karnataka
27.87
44.92
13.77
7.54 4.26 3.93
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Pe
rce
nt
1-2 2-3 3-4 4-5 5-6 6-8
Fluoride concentration (mg/L)
Occurrence in GW
-
Physical Features of Karnataka
Total Geographical Area = 1,92,000 sq.kms.
Forms part of the Deccan plateau.
The Coastal plain:
320 km long and
between 13 and 65
km wide
Western mountain range:
Elevations range from 1500
m to1900 m
The Northern Plains:
Entirely a plateau and
ranges between 400
to 600 m
Southern Plains:
Entirely a plateau
and rugged
-
Most part of the State is underlained by
crystalline rocks such as gneisses,
granites, schists, basalts, charnokites and
small portion of coastal area is having
alluvium.
Major portion of the State is underlained
by crystalline basement aquifers and small
portion of the coastal area and narrow
strip of river courses are occupied by
deltaic and alluvial valley fills.
The crystalline rocks do not have primary
porosity.
The weathered and fractured horizons act
as the water bearing zones and supply
water to wells and bore wells.
The thickness of the weathered zone
extends from a few meters to as much as
30m depending on the rock formation and
topography.
The weathered horizon is followed by
fractured zone which extends upto 150m
in some areas.
Hydrogeology
-
Rainfall
Average annual rainfall in the
state is 1138 mm spread over
55 rainy days.
Varies from as low as 569 mm
in the Northern plains to as
high as 4029 mm in the
Western costal area.
About 2/3rd of the geographical
area (comprising of the
Northern and Southern plains)
of the State receives less than
750 mm of rainfall (semi-arid).
-
Limited surface water resources and
erratic rainfall has increased the
dependence on the groundwater
resources.
Exploitation of ground water in the dry
Northern and Southern plains is
higher as compared to Coastal and
Western mountain range regions.
More than 3 lakh dug-wells have
dried, shallow bore wells have failed
and yield in deep bore wells are
declining.
Area irrigated by ground water
extraction structures is decreasing.
More than Rs.2000 crores invested
by individual farmers on dug wells,
pumpsets and other developmental
works have become infructuous.
Districts with overdeveloped groundwater utilization
Status of Groundwater Exploitation
-
28%
32%
19%
21%
Fluoride
Iron
Nitrate
Brackishness
Habitations affected by groundwater
quality problems
Status of Groundwater
Contamination
-
Kolar District
No.of
Station
Analyzed
Fall (m) ) with No.of stations
and percentage Total
Rise (m) with No.of stations and
percentage Total
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
37 10 27 10 27 8 21.6 76 8 21.6 1 2.7 0 0 24.3
The groundwater levels in 76% of the observation wells monitored by
CGWB show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to
corresponding period of last 10 years.
Dark and grey taluks
13.60%2.91%
26.86%
8.52%
48.10% FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected
Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 5.2m
-
Tumkur District
No.of
Station
Analyzed
Fall (m) ) with No.of stations
and percentage Total
Rise (m) with No.of stations and
percentage Total
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
20 11 55 3 15 5 25 95 0 0 1 5 0 0 5
The ground water levels in 95% of the observation wells monitored by CGWB
show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to
corresponding period of last 10 years.
Dark and grey taluks
12.00%
27.17%
17.80%10.67%
32.37%FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected
Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 5.96 m
-
Chitradurga District
No.of
Station
Analyzed
Fall (m) ) with No.of stations
and percentage Total
Rise (m) with No.of stations and
percentage Total
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
0-2
(m) %
2-4
(m) %
>4
(m) %
14 7 50 3 21.4 1 7.1 79 3 21.4 0 0 0 0 21.4
The groundwater levels in 79% of the observation wells monitored by CGWB
show fall in groundwater levels and were less when compared to groundwater
levels corresponding period of last 10 years.
37.91%
6.36%9.20%25.20%
21.33% FluorideIronNitrateBrackishnessUnaffected
Decline in the depth of groundwater level from 1978 to 1996 = 8.44 m
Dark and grey taluks
-
Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci
-
Granitic and gneissic rocks underlie the study area.
The faults and fractures in these rock formations are occupied by fluoride bearing minerals.
Common fluorine bearing minerals are fluorite, apatite, amphiboles, cryolite and micas that tend to occur in crystalline (granite, granitic gneiss) and sedimentary (limestone, sandstone) rocks
Fluoride from these minerals leaches to the
groundwater.
GW Chemistry
-
GW Chemistry
-
GW Chemistry
-
GW Chemistry
-
Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Tumkur
Gibb’s diagram
-
Kolar
Gibb’s diagram
-
Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Kolar
-
Mamatha & Rao, 2009, Env. Earth Sci Tumkur
-
Nexus between groundwater quality and sanitation practice
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
28
-
Problem Statement
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
29
-
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
30
-
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
31
-
Groundwater serves as a decentralized source of “safe drinking water” for millions of rural and urban people. It accounts for nearly 80 per cent of the rural domestic water needs, and 50 per cent of the urban water needs of the country.
Kumar and Shah 2004, Groundwater contamination
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
32
-
• Sources going dry or lowering of the ground water table.
• Sources becoming quality affected. • Systems outliving their lives. • Systems working below rated capacity due to poor operation and maintenance. • Increase in population resulting into lower per capita availability. • Emergence of new habitations. • Acute seasonal shortages • Over-exploitation of resources
Issues Impacting SGWM in Indian Context:
Report of Working group on 11th Plan for DDWS 2007-2012 Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
33
http://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XI_Plan_Approach_Now.pdf
-
63% of the urban population in India has got access to sewerage and sanitation facilities (47% from sewer and 53% from low cost sanitation) as on March 2004. As a consequence, open defecation is prevalent widely in rural areas but also significantly in urban
areas too.
Sanitation coverage
11th Plan Document on Drinking Water Supply & Sanitation
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
34
http://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XIPlan_BHARATNIRMAN.pdfhttp://ddws.gov.in/sites/upload_files/ddws/files/pdf/pdf/XIPlan_BHARATNIRMAN.pdf
-
Case study
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
35
-
Background & Scope
36
The population is 60,000 and supply is ~ 5 MLD and entirely through GW.
To develop a sustainable water management plan towards the future needs.
To efficiently manage the groundwater resources in terms of quantity &
quality.
Geochemical & Microbiological surveys were performed simultaneously.
.
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
36
-
Karnataka State
Mulbagal Town
Groundwater Management
under IUWM
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
37
-
Table 5: Bore-well details of pump-house series
Pump-house series Supplying bore-wells
Seeganahalli pump house (SPH) M-101, M-107, M-108, M-110, M-200
Kalikamba pump house (KPH) M-202, M-203, M-204, M-205, M-206, M-
207, M-209 , M-210
Someshwarapalya pump house (SOPH) M-304, M-305, M-306, M-308, M-309, M-
310, M-316, M-317
Busal Kunte pump house (BPH) M-111, M-217, M-221
RMC pump house (RMCPH) M-237, M-239, M-240, M-242
The remainder 47 bore-wells contribute to the Inner town series. These bore-well numbers are: M-114, M-115, M-116, M-117, M-118, M – 119, M – 120, M-121, M-122, M-123, M-124, M – 225, M-226, M-227, M-228, M-229, M-230, M-231, M- 233, M-234, M-235, M-236, M-244, M-245, M-300, M-312, M-313, M-314, M-400, M-401, M-402, M – 403, M-404, M-405, M-406, M-407, M-408, M-410, M-411, M-412, M-413, M-414, M- 415, M-417, M-419, M-421 and M-422 respectively.
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
38
-
Cation/Anion balance
-8
-7
-6
-5
-4
-3
-2
-1
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Sample number
Cati
on
/An
ion
Bala
nce
Cation/Anion balance
28.4.09 samples
-
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
450
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Nit
rate
, mg
/L
BW No.
ITS OTS
Permissible limit =45 ppm
-
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
MP
N/1
00
mL
BW No.
Total Coliforms
ITS OTSColiform organisms should not bedetectable in 100 ml of any two
-
0
200
400
600
800
1000
1200
1400
1600
1800
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
MP
N/1
00
mL
BW No.
E. Coli
ITSOTS
No sample should contain E. Coli in 100 ml;
-
0
500
1000
1500
2000
2500
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
TDS,
mg
/L
BW No.
ITS
OTS
Permissible limit = 2000 mg/L
Desirable limit = 500 mg/L
-
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
0.00 5.00 10.00 15.00 20.00 25.00 30.00 35.00 40.00 45.00 50.00
NO
3, m
eq
/l
TZ-, meq/l
-
4
4.5
5
5.5
6
6.5
7
7.5
8
0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1 1.1 1.2 1.3 1.4
pH
Anion/Cation
-
Geochemical classification & Mechanisms
-
0
2
4
6
8
10
12
14
16
18
20
22
24
26
28
30
10 100 1000 10000
EC, micromhos/cm
SA
R
10 100 1000 10000
ITS PHS
C1, low C2 medium
C3 medium-highC4high
C5
V. high
C1-S1C2-S1
C3-S1
C4-S1
C4-S2
Classification-USDA
-
Aquachem software
-
5
2
6
1
3
2
1CaHCO3 type
2NaCl type
3 Mixed CaNaHCO3
4Mixed CaMgCl
5CaCl type
6NaHCO3 type
4
Hydrochemical facies GroundWater Chart Calibration Plots-USGS Software
-
1CaHCO3 type
2NaCl type
3 Mixed CaNaHCO3
4Mixed CaMgCl
5CaCl type
6NaHCO3 type
4
1 2
6
3
5
Hydrochemical facies Hydrochemical facies
GroundWater Chart Calibration Plots-USGS Software
-
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Cl/Cl+HCO3
TD
S,
mg
/L
Rock weathering
dominance
Evapo-
crystallization
dominance
Atmospheric
precipitation
dominance
PHS series
Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram
-
Gibb's chart
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Na/Na+Ca
TD
S, m
g/L
Rock weathering
dominance
Evapo-
crystallization
dominance
Atmospheric
precipitation
dominance
Geochemical mechanisms
PHS
Gibb’s diagram
-
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Cl/Cl+HCO3
TD
S, m
g/L
Rock weathering
dominance
Evapo-
crystallization
dominance
Atmospheric
precipitation
dominance
ITS series
Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram
-
Gibb's chart, ITS
1
10
100
1000
10000
100000
0 0.1 0.2 0.3 0.4 0.5 0.6 0.7 0.8 0.9 1
Na/Na+Ca
TD
S, m
g/L
Rock weathering
dominance
Evapo-
crystallization
dominance
Atmospheric
precipitation
dominance
`
Geochemical mechanisms Gibb’s diagram
-
0
0.5
1
1.5
2
2.5
3
3.5
4
4.5
5
0 10 20 30 40 50 60
Sample Number
F, m
g/L
ITS Mulbagal
PHS Mulbagal
Kolar - Tumkur Series
F Distribution
-
SI=logIAP-logKsp
SI= 0, Mineral is in equilibrium SI> 0, Solution is over-saturated with mineral SI
-
Samp
le No.
Ca, moles/l HCO3,
moles/l
IAP log
IAP
Ksp log
Ksp
SITheoretic
al
1 0.0007734 0.0028 2.17E-06 -5.66 1*10-8
-8 2.34
2 0.0045908 0.0084 3.85E-05 -4.41 1*10-8
-8 3.59
3 0.0061377 0.0072 4.42E-05 -4.35 1*10-8
-8 3.65
4 0.0058882 0.0063 3.72E-05 -4.43 1*10-8
-8 3.57
5 0.0049650 0.0067 3.31E-05 -4.48 1*10-8
-8 3.52
6 0.0028942 0.0065 1.87E-05 -4.73 1*10-8
-8 3.27
7 0.0033183 0.0074 2.47E-05 -4.61 1*10-8
-8 3.39
8 0.0035678 0.0041 1.46E-05 -4.84 1*10-8
-8 3.16
9 0.0011227 0.0032 3.59E-06 -5.45 1*10-8
-8 2.55
Calculations of SI calcite from Ca and HCO3 concentrations. Excel calculations
-
Source: http://www.sswm.info)
Pathogens: Bacteria (0.4 to 2.5μ) and viruses (0.01 to 0.25 μ)
Most nitrogen is excreted as urea, which readily degrades to ammonium. Nitrate is formed by the sequential, microbially-catalysed oxidation of ammonia to nitrite and then to nitrate
Biologically active layer : removes pathogens and reduces porosity
Ben Cave and Pete Kolsky 1999, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
66
Pit latrine, ventilated improved pit latrine and pour flush toilets.
http://www.sswm.info/
-
Pathogen movement and removal by soil Bacteria travel depends on velocity of groundwater flow. During travel, fraction die or retained (adsorbed or screened) on soil matrix. Key factor for removal of bacteria and viruses from groundwater: effluent residence time between contamination source and point of water abstraction. Unsaturated zone is most important line of defence against faecal pollution of aquifer as it is less permeable Probable survival time for coliforms in anaerobic groundwater environment is 4-7 days.
Ben Cave and Pete Kolsky 1999, London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
67
-
E Coli Attenuation
One log removal of E Coli needed 4 m of decline in groundwater level
Sudhakar Rao,IISc, 18th November 2011, IUC,
68
-
Thank You