chimel v . california

13
+ Chimel v. California September 18, 2013

Upload: kostya

Post on 24-Feb-2016

76 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

DESCRIPTION

Chimel v . California. September 18, 2013. September 16 - Mexican Independence from Spain. - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chimel v . California

+

Chimel v. California

September 18, 2013

Page 2: Chimel v . California

+September 16 - Mexican Independence from Spain September 16, 1810, Miguel Hidalgo, who was a Catholic

priest in the village of Dolores, Guanajuato, ordered the arrest of the Spaniards who lived in Dolores. He then rang the church bell, which customarily called the townspeople to mass.

Hidalgo shouted his call to arms against Spain. That famous cry, known as "El Grito," is re-enacted all over present-day Mexico on the night of September 15th. Mexicans celebrate their independence on two consecutive days, the 15th and 16th of September.

Many respected historians believe he said, "¡Viva la Virgen de Guadalupe!" "Death to bad government.!"

Page 3: Chimel v . California

+September 17 - Constitution Day We celebrate one of

America’s greatest documents. More than simply a guideline for government, for 226 years, we have relied on the U.S. Constitution — and the principles of liberty and equality embedded in its words — to make America a more fair and just place for all

Page 4: Chimel v . California

+

Today – September 18, 2013 we’re still talking about bad government and the constitutionChimel v. California

Page 5: Chimel v . California

+

Facts:

Burglary of Jewelry Store

Arrest vs. Search warrant

Search house from top to bottom – attic, garage and small workshop.

Cursory search versus thorough search

Page 6: Chimel v . California

+

Issue ?

Should the items seized be permissible evidence?

Was the scope of the search unreasonable under the Fourth and Fourteenth Amendments?

Page 7: Chimel v . California

+

From State Courts to Federal Court

California Court of Appeal & California Supreme Court both convicted Chimel and affirmed the judgments

Both courts Arrest was invalid because the supporting affidavit was set out in conclusory terms, but held that officers acted in good faith.

The USSC granted certiorari to hear the substantial constitutional claims

Page 8: Chimel v . California

+

USSC Rationale

Carroll v. US – under legal arrest what is found on you or in your control that is unlawful and can be used to prove offense may be seized and held.

Agnello v. US – contemporaneously search the place where the arrest is made

Marron – if you have a search warrant, which would list the articles you’re looking for, you don’t have to ignore other things used to carry on criminal enterprise

Go-Bart Importing Co v. US – “had an abundance of information and time to swear out a valid [search] warrant, he failed to do so.” – search and seizure unlawful

Page 9: Chimel v . California

+Fourth Amendment – “no Warrants shall issue, but upon probable cause”

Page 10: Chimel v . California

+

4th Amendment places the magistrate between citizen and police

Click icon to add picture

Click icon to add pictureClick icon to add picture

Page 11: Chimel v . California

+Today – September 18, 2013 we’re still talking about bad government and the constitutionChimel v. California

Page 12: Chimel v . California

+

14th Amendment places the magistrate between citizen and state

No state shall make or enforce any law which shall abridge the privileges or immunities of citizens of the United States

Click icon to add picture

Click icon to add pictureClick icon to add picture

Page 13: Chimel v . California

+

Considerations

Search incident to arrest for officer safety

Area within reach to gain a weapon or destroy evidence

Remote in Time and place