chimera extensions for modeling, evaluation and in-silico ...€¦ · chimera extensions for...

1
Chimera Extensions for Modeling, Evaluation and In-silico Mutagenesis of 3D Protein Structures Laimer J., Lackner P. University of Salzburg, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Molecular Biology Background Knowledge of the 3D structure of a protein is essential for the understanding of its biological function. Moreover, it supports the focused planning of wet lab experiments for many purposes. Experimental structure determination is time consuming and associated with practical limitations. Therefore computational methods have been devised for the prediction of a 3D structure from its sequence, the prediction structural changes upon mutations and the evaluation of structural models. The corresponding computational tools are commonly very powerful but often difficult to use for unexperienced users and cumbersome to combine in an efficient manner. We developed an extension bundle for the visualization software UCSF Chimera[1], which integrates several state of the art methods into a single workspace, which allows the user an easy access to the methods without any particular knowledge in their operation. Implementation Our extensions are based on third-party software, namely ProSa 2003[2], a software tool for the validation of 3D protein structures by knowledge-based potentials, and MODELLER[3], a software tool for the prediction of 3D protein structures based on homology modeling techniques. Evaluation & In-silico Mutagenesis Chimera ProSa Scoring GUI ProSa Mutation GUI Result Viewer Energy Viewer ProSa Handler ProSa Access Class ProSa Results parameter XML file Import Handler Script and Data ProSa Mutation Handler temp. PDB file ProSa Python script The evaluation of protein structures and mutations is based on ProSa 2003. A configurable handler gives easy access to ProSa functionality and prepares the results for the Chimera extensions. Results are presented in tables and graphs. Numeric results can be mapped to the 3D structure drawings. Comparative Modeling templates template evaluation ...FKAFVLDADNLVPKIAPQAIK HSEILEGDGGPGTIKKIT modeling process main GUI result browser analysis with Chimera target a b The comparative modeling extension is based on Sali’s MODELLER. MODELLER is configured by Python scripts which are created and called based on the given settings. The results are shown in a browser for a comfortable file handling. The extension ’Blast Protein’ can be used for template selection. Approach for Hypoallergen Design Our in silico mutagenesis extension provides a mode for the search for the most destabilizing or stabilizing mutations for a given 3D structure. The approach is based on the assumption that an increased ProSa z-score indicates a destabilization of the structure, where a decrease indicates a stabilization of the structure. For the design of a hypoallergenic variant of a pro- tein, the most destabilizing mutations are deter- mined by an iteratively search: best <- wildtype iterations <- 4 for i <- 1 to iterations: foreach residue in sequence: foreach possible mutation: m <- create mutant if z-score(m) > z-score(best): best <- m fix mutations of best Thalhamer and coworkers[4] successfully used this approach for the design of hypoallergenic variants of Bet v 1a, the major allergen of the european white birch. The four mutation points, determined by the in silico mutagenesis ap- proach, within the 3D structure (A) and the corresponding CD spectra analysis (B), which indicates a structural change[4].* The mutants show a significantly reduced IgE cross- linking capacity after an immunization with wild-type Bet v 1a (A). An immunization with the mutants leads to a negligible level of Bet v 1a cross-linking IgE (B)[4].* Conclusion We implemented extensions for the 3D-visualization software UCSF Chimera, which provide functionality for the evaluation and in silico mu- tagenesis of 3D protein structures, based on ProSa 2003, as well as for comparative modeling, based on MODELLER. The extensions are easy to use without any knowledge about operating the underlying software and results are presented within Chimera. All components are freely available for academic research. Contact: [email protected] References [1] UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Pettersen EF et al. J Comput Chem. Oct;25(13):1605-12, 2004. http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/ [2] Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Sippl MJ Proteins Vol. 17, pp. 355-362, 1993. http://www.came.sbg.ac.at/ [3] Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Sali A et al. J. Mol. Biol. 234, 779-815, 1993. http://salilab.org/modeller/ [4] Designing hypoallergenic derivatives for allergy treatment by means of in silico mutation and screening. Thalhamer T et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol., 125(4):926-934.e10, 2010. *Figure taken from [4]

Upload: others

Post on 10-Aug-2020

2 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Chimera Extensions for Modeling, Evaluation and In-silico ...€¦ · Chimera Extensions for Modeling, Evaluation and In-silico Mutagenesis of 3D Protein Structures Laimer J., Lackner

Chimera Extensions for Modeling, Evaluation andIn-silico Mutagenesis of 3D Protein Structures

Laimer J., Lackner P.University of Salzburg, Faculty of Natural Sciences, Department of Molecular Biology

Background

Knowledge of the 3D structure of a protein is essential for the understanding of its biological function. Moreover, it supports the focused planning of wet lab experimentsfor many purposes. Experimental structure determination is time consuming and associated with practical limitations. Therefore computational methods have been devisedfor the prediction of a 3D structure from its sequence, the prediction structural changes upon mutations and the evaluation of structural models.

The corresponding computational tools are commonly very powerful but often difficult to use for unexperienced users and cumbersome to combine in an efficient manner.We developed an extension bundle for the visualization software UCSF Chimera[1], which integrates several state of the art methods into a single workspace, which allowsthe user an easy access to the methods without any particular knowledge in their operation.

Implementation

Our extensions are based on third-party software, namely ProSa 2003[2], a software tool for the validation of 3D protein structures by knowledge-based potentials, andMODELLER[3], a software tool for the prediction of 3D protein structures based on homology modeling techniques.

Evaluation & In-silico Mutagenesis

Chimera

ProSa Scoring GUI

ProSa Mutation GUI

Result Viewer

Energy Viewer

ProSa Handler

ProSa Access Class

ProSa Results

parameterXML file

ImportHandler

Script and Data

ProSaMutation Handler

temp. PDB file

ProSaPythonscript

The evaluation of protein structures and mutations is based on ProSa 2003. Aconfigurable handler gives easy access to ProSa functionality and prepares theresults for the Chimera extensions. Results are presented in tables and graphs.Numeric results can be mapped to the 3D structure drawings.

Comparative Modeling

templates

template evaluation

...FKAFVLDADNLVPKIAPQAIKHSEILEGDGGPGTIKKIT

modeling process

main GUI

result browser analysis with Chimera

target

a b

The comparative modeling extension is based on Sali’s MODELLER. MODELLERis configured by Python scripts which are created and called based on the givensettings. The results are shown in a browser for a comfortable file handling. Theextension ’Blast Protein’ can be used for template selection.

Approach for Hypoallergen Design

Our in silico mutagenesis extension provides a modefor the search for the most destabilizing or stabilizingmutations for a given 3D structure. The approachis based on the assumption that an increased ProSaz-score indicates a destabilization of the structure,where a decrease indicates a stabilization of thestructure.For the design of a hypoallergenic variant of a pro-tein, the most destabilizing mutations are deter-mined by an iteratively search:

best <- wildtype

iterations <- 4

for i <- 1 to iterations:

foreach residue in sequence:

foreach possible mutation:

m <- create mutant

if z-score(m) > z-score(best):

best <- m

fix mutations of best

Thalhamer and coworkers[4] successfully used this approach for the design of hypoallergenic variants of Bet v 1a,the major allergen of the european white birch.

The four mutation points, determined by the in silico mutagenesis ap-proach, within the 3D structure (A) and the corresponding CD spectraanalysis (B), which indicates a structural change[4].*

The mutants show a significantly reduced IgE cross-linking capacity after an immunization with wild-type Betv 1a (A). An immunization with the mutants leads to anegligible level of Bet v 1a cross-linking IgE (B)[4].*

Conclusion

We implemented extensions for the 3D-visualization software UCSFChimera, which provide functionality for the evaluation and in silico mu-tagenesis of 3D protein structures, based on ProSa 2003, as well as forcomparative modeling, based on MODELLER. The extensions are easy touse without any knowledge about operating the underlying software andresults are presented within Chimera. All components are freely availablefor academic research.

Contact: [email protected]

References

[1] UCSF Chimera–a visualization system for exploratory research and analysis. Pettersen EF et al.J Comput Chem. Oct;25(13):1605-12, 2004. http://plato.cgl.ucsf.edu/chimera/

[2] Recognition of errors in three-dimensional structures of proteins. Sippl MJ Proteins Vol. 17, pp.355-362, 1993. http://www.came.sbg.ac.at/

[3] Comparative protein modelling by satisfaction of spatial restraints. Sali A et al. J. Mol. Biol.234, 779-815, 1993. http://salilab.org/modeller/

[4] Designing hypoallergenic derivatives for allergy treatment by means of in silico mutationand screening. Thalhamer T et al. J Allergy Clin Immunol., 125(4):926-934.e10, 2010.*Figure taken from [4]