2

Cosan Ayan

Hafez HafezADCO

Sharon Hurst

Fikri Kuchuk

Aubrey O’CallaghanPuerto La Cruz

John PefferAnadarko

Hassi Messaoud

Julian PopSugar Land

Murat ZeybekAl-Khobar

Mahmood Akbar

AIT CQGFMI MDT

OFA RFTRDT

1.

2. kr

kv kz ks

32001

1

6

kh kv

kv /kh kh /kv

kh

/kv 1 2

104

A B

Lake LW The Origins of Anisotropy40 4 1988 4 395-396]

103 105 AB

kh

kv

>

4

3. Weber AG Simpson RE Gasfield DevelopmentReservoir and Production Operations Planning

38 2 1986 2 217226

4. Ayan C Colley N Cowan G Ezekwe E Wannel MGoode P Halford F Joseph J Mongini A ObondokoG Pop J Measuring Permeability Anisotropy TheLatest Approach Oilfield Review 6 4 1994

10 24 35

5. k d Cqµ∆pss mD qcm3 s µ cp ∆pss

psiC

RFT MDTC 660

6. Dussan EB Sharma Y Analysis of the PressureResponse of a Single Probe Formation Tester SPE

7 2 1992 6 151156

7. J e n s e n C L M a y s o n H J E v a l u a t i o n o fPermeabilities Determined from Repeat Formation TesterMeasurements Made in the Prudhoe Bay Field SPE14400 SPE

1985 9 22 25

8. Goode PA Thambynayagam RKM Influence of anInvaded Zone on a Multiple Probe Formation TesterSPE 23030 SPE

1991 11 4 7

kd

[3]

WFT

[4]

>

5

RFT

WFT

5 20 3 0.3 1.23 Kd

[5] Kd Kv

Kd Kh[6]

Kd

Kd[7]

[8]

WFT

MDT AB C D E DST

F G HA F

IPTTKv Kh C H

øCt

2001

>

6

[1]

kav

kihi hi

kav kihi hi

kav

ki -1hi hi

-1 [2]

[3]

A A’20%

0.3 B B20% 0.9 A A’ B

B’

khh µ h

>

7

MDT

[9]

RDT

[10]

MDT

[11]

IPTTkh kv øCt

[12]

[13]

1 3.3

[4]

DSTDST

DST 1

kv kh

IPTT

9. MDT

Martineau

10. Proett MA Wilson CC Batakrishna M AdvancedPermeability and Anisotropy Measurements WhileTesting and Sampling in Real-Time Using a Dual ProbeFormation Tester SPE 62919 SPE

2000 10 1 4

11. Zimmerman T Maclnnes J Hoppe J Pop J Long TApplication of Emerging Wireline Formation Testing

Technologies OSEA 901051990 12 4 7

12. VIT

ØCt Ø Ct

Ct Cr

Cf IPTT

Cr

Cf

13.

2001

1. Zheng S Y Corbett PWM Ryseth A Stewart G Uncertainty inWell Test and Core Permeability Analysis A Case Study in FluvialChannel Reservoirs Northern North Sea Norway AAPG Bulletin84 12 2000 12 1929 1954

2. Pickup GE Ringrose PS Corbett PWM ensen JL Sorbie KSGeology Geometry and Effective Flow SPE 28374 SPE

9949 25 28

3. Herron MM Johnson DL Schwartz LM A Robust PermeabilityEstimator for Siliclastics SPE 49301 SPE

1998 9 27 30

4. Modern Reservoir Testing SMP 70551994

8

45cm3 s 0.7gal min

1000 cm3

0.26gal

kv

PVT

24

DST

MDT>

9

0.1 1 10 100 10000.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

kh = 39 mDkv = 24 mDµ = 1 cp

DST

DST

DSTMDT

DST

DST

5

DST

DST3

[14]

DST

DSTDST

DST

DSTDST

TotalFinalElfDST

[15]

DST

[16]

0.5

ks= 3√ ( k2

h kv )

[17]

kh

[18]

FMI

kh ks kv

> DST

d∆p dln tp ∆t∆t tp ∆t

0.5 0

14. 36

11

15. Ayan C Nicolle G Reservoir Fluid Identificationand Testing with a Modular Formation Tester in anAging Field SPE 49528

1998 8 11 14

16. C

qsf q

qsf q 24Cdp dtC

17. msp msp = 2453qµ (√µøCt )/ks

3/2

φq µ

PVT

18. [(tp+∆t)/∆t] tp

∆tmr = 162qµ/khh h

17

2001

10

IPTT (V2)

IPTT (V2)

400

600

500

300

200

100

0

0

5

10

15

20

25

30

35

1 2 3 4 5

1 2 3 4 5

IPTT (V1)

IPTT (V1)

0

0

TotalFinalElf10

0.25 0.5 9.8 19.6kv kh

DST

DST

MDT

DSTIPTT

IPTTDST

DST

DST

DST DSTWFT [19]

DSTPVT

GOR 11 12 API

DST

DST5 7

DST

20007 27

DST

3

1 30MDT

216

16

3

ks kh

2390mD 6mD

DST IPTTDST

IPTTDST V1 V2

2 6. 4.45 14.6

>

11

ohm-mAPI0 150

SP-100 0mV

1 1000 45 0p.u.X00

X10

X20

X30

X40

X50

X60

DST

kv kh

DST 3

13 API

19. Hurst SM, McCoy TF Hows MP Using the CasedHole Formation Tester for Pressure Transient AnalysisSPE 63087 SPE

2000 10 1 4

2001

IPTT

>

DST

OFA2

164psi[1130 kPa]

>

-0.5 0>

12

IPTT kv khkh

IPTT FMI

IPTTkv kh

DST

UAEIPTT

[20]

1

20. Kuchuk FJ Halford F Hafez H Zeybek M TheUse of Vertical Interference Testing to ImproveReservoir Characterization ADIPEC 0903

92000 10 15-18

>

13

3600

3800

4000

4200

0 40001000 2000 3000˚–… £‹ˆº

20

15

10

5

0

3800

3600

0 40001000 2000 30003880

3890

3900

3910

4000

4200

3920

3930

IPTT1000 3 60 3

20 3 1.2 3

IPTT CQG

21

IPTT

IPTT

MDT 6.4

14.4 1.95 4.4

30 60

1 5 2 1 2 . 4 3 . 33

30 60

2001

>

14

31

300psi 2070kPa10psi

69kPa 2psi14kPa

DST

31

0.5 15

PVT

[21]

>

15

P

t

P

log∆t

∆P,∆P’

∆P,∆P’

log∆t

IPTT

kv kh

øCt

21.

2001

>

16

1515

42

18

0.02mD 1350mD

1mD

X151 kv kh

0.5psi 3.5kPa

FMI

12

>

17

MDTIPTT

20

MDT

IPTT

IPTTkhh µ

20 306 9

IPTT

2001

>

>

18

22. Badaam H Al-Matroushi S Young N Ayan CMihcakan M Kuchuk FJ Estimation of FormationProperties Using Multiprobe Formation Tester inLayered Reservoirs SPE 49141 SPE

1998 9 27 30

Y1 Y5

7 A G IPTT

7 23 IPTT

[22]

23 IPTT

Y2 Y2A Y3 Y4

MDT

S

H V1 V2

2.3 14.30.7 4.4

øCt

FMI

V1 S V2

>

>

19

F Y3MDT FMI

FMI

kh kh kv

Y2 F GE

Y2A EFMI

kh IPTT

IPTT

2001

>

kh IPTT kh IPTT

khE

>

20

HassiB e r k i n e S o u t hAnadarko

WAG

Argilo-Gréseux Inferior TAGI[23] TAGI

5 15 15 50

TAGIAnadarko Hassi Berkine South

6.6 2kh kh

kh/kvkh

Kh

>

>

21

15 TAGI 1 2 1 IPTT100mD/cp 2

XX40.2 4

kh kv

10

IPTT

15

kh kv

23. Peffer J O’Callaghan A Pop J In-SituDetermination of Permeability Anisotropy and itsVertical Distribution A Case Study SPE 38942

SPE 1997 10 5 8

2001

>

22

MDT

1765 5266

50mD cp10

kh kv

XX40.2

26.6 [24]

TAGI15 30 6 12

1MDT 2

MDT100

[25]

10 5

MDT

MDT

MDT 19987

1112.3 3

MDT

6 IPTT 19 [26]

100psi 689kPa5 50mD

IPTT

>

23

2983MDT

0.0151.0

0.5 0.15

24. Goode PA Pop JJ Murphy WF III Multiple-ProbeFormation Testing and Vertical Reservoir ContinuitySPE 22738 SPE

1991 10 6 9

25.

26. Kuchuk FJ Interval Pressure Transient Testing withMDT Packer Probe Module in Horizontal Wells SPE39523 SPE

1998 2 17 19

27. Ayan C Donovan M Pitts AS Permeability andAnisotropy Determination in a Retrograde Gas Field toAssess Horizontal Well Performance SPE 71811

2001 9 4 7

28. Underhill WB Moore L Meeten GH ModelBased Sticking Risk Assessment for Wireline FormationTesting Tools in the U S Gulf Coast SPE 48963

SPE 1998 9 27 30

DST

[27]

[28]

JS/LS

2001

FMI 2983 IPTT

>