christopher foster oxford internet institute
DESCRIPTION
Does quality matter for innovations in low income markets? The case of the Kenyan mobile phone sector. Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute (undertaken during PhD research in IDPM, University of Manchester). Research focus. Innovations and low income groups - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Does quality matter for innovations in low income
markets?The case of the Kenyan mobile phone
sector.
Christopher FosterOxford Internet Institute
(undertaken during PhD research in IDPM, University of Manchester)
![Page 2: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
Research focus
Innovations and low income groups
• What is an ‘inclusive innovation’?– more than innovation– impact; process
inclusion
• Is quality a key element in this?
Heeks(2013)
![Page 3: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
Innovation and quality
Low income markets = unclear
1) Extent of quality and effects in low income markets?
• BoP view vs Empirical cases
2) Innovation in/for low income markets is different.• Interlinked stages; Intermediaries; User
appropriation
3) What is effective policy around quality (if any)?• Policy as a process; Public/private standards
![Page 4: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Mobile phone sector in Kenya
Scaled and low income focussed:
• Operator coverage: 92%
• Handset access: 70% • Mobile money: 83%
Quality Issues at the fore…
![Page 5: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
Quality concerns• Short term:
Difficult to evaluate. • Medium term:
Trust, cost, intermediaries
• Long term:Risk of ‘big bang’
“close to 2.4 million mobile phones in the market are counterfeit, representing 9.39 % of
the active mobile devices” (CCK 2013)
![Page 6: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
Drivers of quality declines• New lead actors
– Partnerships; manufacturers
• New intermedaries– Adaptation
• New users– Appropriation, use
![Page 7: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Policy
• Existed in cases– Unclear implementation– Existence of extended intermediaries
![Page 8: Christopher Foster Oxford Internet Institute](https://reader035.vdocument.in/reader035/viewer/2022062409/56814d12550346895dba4f56/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
ConclusionsQuality becomes key concern in how
innovations are inclusive….
• Recommendations– More focus on innovation and quality– Responsivity to appropriation– Lead firms and low income focus (USF, support)
• Policy is crucial– Firms: Low income entrance vs guarding quality– Policy Making + Implementation– Intermediaries: Policing and policy