chronic kidney disease - aventri · - jafar, et al., 2001 • blood pressure below 130/80 is...
TRANSCRIPT
3/17/2017
1
Chronic Kidney Disease
Halting the Progression of
chronic kidney disease
Jayant Kumar, MDRenal Medicine Assoc., Albuquerque, NM
Definition ofChronic Kidney Disease
AJKD 2002: 39(2)
Stages of Chronic Kidney Disease
AJKD 2002: 39(2)
3/17/2017
2
USRDS ADR, 2007
Prevalence of ESRD has been rising steadily
1.11.6
2.42.9
3.9
5.5
17.918.6
0
5
10
15
20
Pati
en
ts W
ho
Are
Aw
are
of
Weak o
r F
ail
ing
Kid
neys*
(%)
Awareness of Early-Stage CKD Is Low
in the US Population
*Proportion of patients who were told they had weak or failing kidneys, eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2).
Coresh et al. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2005:16:180-188.
<30 30+ <30 30+ <30 30+ F MSex:Albuminuria:
eGFR: 90+ 60-89 30-59 30-59
M450
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
USRDS ADR, 2007
Diabetes and hypertension are leading causes of kidney failure
Incident ESRD rates, by primary diagnosis, adjusted for age, gender, & race.
3/17/2017
3
AJKD 2002: 39(2)
Stages of CKD:
A Clinical Action Plan
AJKD 2002: 39(2)
Incident ESRD patients; rates adjusted for age & gender.
Incidence varies widely by race and ethnicity
Rate
per m
illi
on
po
pu
lati
on
Af Am
N Am
Hispanic
Asian
White
Non-Hispanic
USRDS ADR, 2007
3/17/2017
4
USRDS ADR, 2006
CKD is disproportionately costly
Distribution of costs for CKD, HTN, & diabetic patients in Medicare population, 2004.
26 million Americans have CKD or albuminuria
Coresh, et al., 2007
10.1
15.5
0.7
0
5
10
15
20
25
Persistent
albuminuria with
eGFR ≥ 60
eGFR of 30-59 eGFR of 15-29
Millions o
f people
But few are aware of it – even those with eGFR less than 30
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
eGFR of 30-59 eGFR of 15-29
Percen
t R
eport
Bein
g A
ware o
f
Havin
g W
eak o
f Failin
g K
idn
eys
Men
Women
Coresh, et al., 2007
3/17/2017
5
CKD is prevalent in CVD
Ix, et al., 2003; Anavekar, et al., 2004; Shlipak, et al., 2004.
0
20
40
60
CAD
CrCl ≤60 mL/min
AMI
GFR <60 mL/min
CHF
GFR ≤60 mL/min
23%
46%
33%
Pati
en
ts W
ith
CK
D (
%)
In addition to ESRD, CKD leads to CVD
Go, et al., 2004
1.0
2.8
3.4
2.0
1.4
0.0
0.5
1.0
1.5
2.0
2.5
3.0
3.5
4.0
≥ 60 45-59 30-44 15-29 < 15
Ad
juste
d H
azard
Ratio
eGFR
Adjusted* hazard ratio for CVD events
People with CKD do progress to kidney
failure–especially those middle-aged and
younger
Levey, et al., 2006
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
Progressed to Kidney
Failure
Died Before Kidney
Failure
Died After Kidney
Failure
Pro
po
rtio
n o
f p
ati
en
ts
Long term (7 year) follow up of 408 non-diabetic CKD patients (mean initial GFR=39, mean initial age=52 year old)
3/17/2017
6
Younger people with CKD are more
likely to develop ESRD before death
Copyright ©2007 American Society of NephrologyO'Hare, 2006
Annual mortality by age group and eGFR.
Incidence of ESRD has leveled off, perhaps because of better use of preventive measures
Incident ESRD patients; rates adjusted for age, gender & race.
0
50
100
150
200
250
300
350
400
80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03 04 05
Rate
per m
illi
on
po
pu
lati
on
USRDS ADR, 2007
Adherence to treatment guidelines –room for improvement
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
95 96 97 98 99 00 01 02 03
The percentage of diabetic CKD patients receiving ACE-Is/ARBs has been slow to improve
Percen
t o
f p
ati
en
ts
USRDS ADR, 2007
3/17/2017
7
2 simple tests will identify CKD in adults
• eGFR - Estimated GFR from serum
creatinine using the MDRD equation
• UACR - Urine albumin to creatinine ratio
on a “spot” urine sample• 24-hour urine collections are NOT needed
- Diabetics should be tested once a year. Others at risk
can be tested less frequently as long as normal.
• MDRD estimating equation is not applicable to
children
• Updated Schwartz formula provides reasonable
estimate in children with mild-moderate CKD
(GFR – 15-75 mL/min/1.73 m2)
Updated Schwartz Formula
eGFR = k * Ht/Scr
Where k=0.4, Ht in cm and Scr in mg/dL and measured by
enzymatic methodology
Estimation of GFR in children
Caveats to eGFR
• An estimate based on population data--not
the patient’s actual GFR
• Not reliable when used with patients:
– with GFR above 60 ml/ min/1.73 m2
– with rapidly changing creatinine levels
(e.g., acute renal failure in the ICU)
– with extremes in muscle mass, e.g.
cachexia or paraplegia
– under age 18
3/17/2017
8
Diabetes
The Leading Cause of Kidney
Failure
Increased Mortality in Patients With Diabetes
and CKD: 2-Year Clinical Outcomes
CKD identified as ICD-9-CM diagnosis code, includes CKD from diabetes, hypertension,
obstructive uropathy, and other diagnosis codes reported on USRDS ESRD registration forms.
DM = diabetes mellitus; ESRD = end-stage renal disease; ICD-9-CM = International Statistical
Classification of Diseases, 9th Revision, Clinical Modification.Collins et al. Kidney Int. 2003;64(suppl 87):S24-S31.
+ DM,
- CKD
- DM,
+CKD
+ DM,
+ CKD
Medical Cohort
Pati
en
ts (
%)
0
20
40
60
80
100
84.067.6 61.6
No Events
29.515.7
32.3
Death
ESRD, CKD Stage 5
0.3
2.96.1
M9
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Proteinuria Predicts Stroke and CHD
Events in Patients With Type 2 Diabetes
P<0.001
40
30
20
10
0
Stroke CHD
Events80604020
0
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1.0
Su
rviv
al C
urv
es f
or
CV
Mo
rtality
Overall: P<0.001
Incid
en
ce (
%)
Follow-Up (mo)
CHD = coronary heart disease; Prot = urinary protein excretion; CV = cardiovascular.Miettinen et al. Stroke. 1996;27:2033-2039.
Prot 150-300 mg/LProt <150 mg/L Prot >300 mg/L
0 100
M49
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
3/17/2017
9
Evidence for Effects of Good Glycemic Control on
Complications, Including Nephropathy
DCCT = The Diabetes Control and Complications Trial.DCCT Study Group. N Engl J Med. 1993;329:977-986; Ohkubo. Diabetes Res Clin Prac. 1995;28:103-117;
UKPDS Study Group. Lancet. 1998;352:837-853.
M463
Trial
Complication
DCCT
A1C: (9 7%)
N = 1441
Kumamoto
(9 7%)
N = 110
UKPDS
(8 7%)
N = 5102
Retinopathy 76% 69% 17-21%
Nephropathy 54% 70% 24-33%
Neuropathy 60% – –
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
• Intensive glycemic control lessens progression from microalbuminuria in Type 1 diabetes–goal in Type 2 is less clear- DCCT, 1993
- ACCORD, 2008
• Antihypertensive therapy with ACE Inhibitors or ARBs lessens proteinuria and progression- Giatras, et al., 1997
- Psait, et al., 2000
- Jafar, et al., 2001
• Blood pressure below 130/80 is beneficial- Sarnak, et al., 2005
We can have an impact on progression of CKD
KDOQI Guideline 2012 update, A1C
• 2.1: We recommend a target hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) of 7.0% to
prevent or delay progression of the microvascular
complications of diabetes, including DKD. (1A)
• 2.2: We recommend not treating to an HbA1c target of <7.0% in
patients at risk of hypoglycemia. (1B)
• 2.3: We suggest that target HbA1c be extended above 7.0% in
individuals with co-morbidities or limited life expectancy and
risk of hypoglycemia. (2C)
3/17/2017
10
KDOQI Practice update 2012, Lipids
• 4.1: We recommend using LDL-C lowering medicines, such as
statins or statin/ezetimibe combination, to reduce risk of major
atherosclerotic events in patients with diabetes and CKD,
including those who have received a kidney transplant. (1B)
• 4.2: We recommend not initiating statin therapy in patients with
diabetes who are treated by dialysis. (1B)
KDOQI Guideline 2012, Albuminuria
• 6.1: We recommend not using an angiotensin-converting
enzyme inhibitor (ACE-I) or an angiotensin receptor blocker
(ARB) for the primary prevention of DKD in normotensive
normoalbuminuric patients with diabetes. (1A)
• 6.2: We suggest using an ACE-I or an ARB in normotensive
patients with diabetes and albuminuria levels >30 mg/g who are
at high risk of DKD or its progression. (2C)
KDOQI 2012, use of hypoglycemics
• Insulin, all kinds: No adjustment for GFR
• 1st gen. sulfonylureas: avoid use
• 2nd gen sulfonylureas: Glipizide (no adjustment), Glyburide (avoid
use), Glimperide (start at 1 mg daily)
• Metformin: Do not use if SCr ≥ 1.5 mg/dL men, ≥ 1.4 in women
• Thiazolidinediones: No adjustment
• DPP-4 inhibitors: Linagliptin (no adjustment), Sitagliptin GFR 30-50,
50 mg/d, GFR <30, 25 mg
• Incretin mimetic: Exenatide (Byetta). Not recommended GFR <30,
Liraglutide, No data with CKD
3/17/2017
11
Hypertension
The Second Leading cause of
Kidney Failure
Recommendations for BP and
RAS Management in CKD
BP = blood pressure; RAS = renin angiotensin system; CCB = calcium channel blocker;
BB = b-blocker; JNC 7 = The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention,
Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure.
ADA. Diabetes Care. 2005;28(suppl 1); Chobanian et al. JAMA. 2003;289:2560-2572; Kidney Disease Outcomes
Quality Initiatives (K/DOQI). Am J Kidney Dis. 2004;43(5 suppl 1):S1-S290.
Patient
GroupGoal BP(mm Hg) First Line Adjunctive
+ Diabetes <130/80 ACE-I or ARB Diuretics then CCB or BB
Diabetes
+ Proteinuria<130/80 ACE-I or ARB Diuretics then CCB or BB
Diabetes
Proteinuria<130/80
No specific preference:
Diuretics then ACE-I, ARB, CCB, or BB
EXPECT TO NEED TO USE 3+ AGENTS TO ACHIEVE GOALS
Recommendations largely consistent across JNC 7, ADA, and K/DOQI
M60
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
ACEI/ARB & Reduced Risk of Rapid GFR
Decline, Kidney Failure, or Death
-50
-40
-30
-20
-10
0
Co
mp
osite R
isk (%
)*
Wright et al for the AASK Study Group. JAMA. 2002;288:2421-2431. [AASK - African American Study of Kidney Disease and Hypertension]Brenner et al for the RENAAL Study Investigators. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:861-869. [RENAAL = Reduction of Endpoints in NIDDM with the Angiotensin II Antagonist Losartan]Lewis et al for the Collaborative Study Group. N Engl J Med. 2001;345:851-860.[IDNT = Irbesartan in Diabetic Nephropathy Trial.]
Ramipril vs
Amlodipine
P = 0.004
Ramipril vs
Metoprolol
P = 0.04
Losartan vs
Placebo
P = 0.02
-38
-22
-16
Irbesartan vs Placebo
P = 0.02
-20
Irbesartan vs Amlodipine
P = 0.006
-23
AASK (N=1094) RENAAL (N=1513) IDNT (N=1722)
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
3/17/2017
12
Relationship Between Achieved BP
and GFR
-14
-12
-10
-8
-6
-4
-2
0
95 98 101 104 107 110 113 116 119
eG
FR
(m
L/m
in/1
.73 m
2)
per
y
MAP = Mean Arterial Pressure*
r = 0.69
P<0.05
Untreated
Hypertension
130/80 140/90
*MAP = [SBP + (2 × DBP)]/3 mm Hg.
Summary of 9 studies used in figure.
Parving et al. 1989; Viberti et al. 1993; Klahr et al. 1993; Hebert et al. 1994; Lebovitz et al. 1994;
Moschio et al. 1996; Bakris et al. 1996; Bakris et al. 1997; GISEN Group. 1997.Bakris et al. Am J Kidney Dis. 2000;36:646-661.
M465
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Anemia
Close association with CKD stage
*NHANES participants aged ≥20 y with anemia as defined by WHO criteria: hemoglobin (Hgb)
<12 g/dL for women, and Hgb <13 g/dL for men. USRDS 2004 Annual Data Report. The data reported here have been supplied by the USRDS. The interpretation and
reporting of these data are the responsibility of the author(s) and in no way should be seen as an official policy or
interpretation of the U.S. government. Available at: www.usrds.org. Accessed 3/28/05.
Anemia Prevalence by CKD Stage
Pati
en
ts W
ith
An
em
ia*
(%)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
1 2 3 4-5
NHANES IIINHANES 1999-2000
CKD Stage
M71
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
3/17/2017
13
Anemia Treatment Eligibility
Serum Creatinine (2.0 mg/dl or above) or
Creatinine Clearance (45 ml/min or below)
and
Hemoglobin (10g/dl or below) or
Hematocrit (30% or below) or
Symptoms of anemia
Consequences of Anemia in CKD
Reduced oxygen delivery to tissues
Decrease in Hgb compensated by increased cardiac output
Progressive cardiac damage and progressive renal damage1
Increased mortality risk2
Reduced quality of life (QOL)3
Fatigue
Diminished exercise capacity
Reduced cognitive function
Left ventricular hypertrophy (LVH)4
1. Silverberg et al. Blood Purif. 2003;21:124-130. 2. Collins et al. Semin Nephrol. 2000;20:345-349; 3. The US
Recombinant Human Erythropoietin Study Group. Am J Kidney Dis. 1991;18:50-59; 4. Levin. Semin Dial.
2003;16:101-105.
M76
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Impact of treatment
Risk of ESA use includes increase cardio-
vascular events like MI/Stroke, worsening
HTN and progression of solid tumors
Maximize iron stores before using ESA
Read the FDA black box warning and consent
patients before ESA use
ESA use and correction of Hb above 10
decreases transfusion need and hence better
chance to get kidney transplant
3/17/2017
14
Secondary
Hyperparathyroidism
An Early and Modifiable
Complication of CKD
Calcitriol Decline and iPTH Elevation
as CKD Progresses
N = 150.
iPTH = intact PTH. Adapted from Martinez et al. Nephrol Dial Transplant. 1996;11(suppl 3):22-28.
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
152535455565758595105
100
200
300
400
0
10
20
30
40
50
iPT
H(p
g/m
L)
Calc
itri
ol
1,2
5(O
H) 2
D3
(pg
/mL
)
Stage 3
7.4 million
Stage 2
5.7 million
Stage 4
300,000
CKD Stage 1
5.6 million
25
65
Low-Normal
Calcitriol
High-Normal
PTH
M236
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Feedback Loops in SHPT
Ca = calcium; CVD = cardiovascular disease; P = phosphorus.
Courtesy of Kevin Martin, MB, BCh.
PTH
Bone Disease
Fractures
Bone pain
Marrow fibrosis
Erythropoietin resistance
Serum P1,25D
Calcitriol
Renal Failure
PTH
Systemic Toxicity
CVD
Hypertension
Inflammation
Calcification
Immunological
25D
Ca++
Decreased Vitamin D Receptors and Ca-Sensing Receptors
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
3/17/2017
15
-2.25
-2.00
-1.75
-1.50
-1.25
-1.00
-0.75
-0.50
-0.25
0.00
Spine Hip Arm
Bo
ne M
inera
l D
en
sit
y,
Z-S
co
re
PTH <60 pg/mL PTH 60-120 pg/mL PTH >120 pg/mL
Bone Loss Correlates With Severity of
SHPT in CKD Stages 3 and 4
*P<0.05 compared with patients with PTH in the normal range.
Z-Score = comparison to the mean value for women at a similar risk, including age, weight,
and ethnicity.Rix et al. Kidney Int. 1999;56:1084-1093.
*
*
*
M93
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Bone-Fracture Rate Increases as CKD Progresses:
Fractures in Patients on Dialysis
*Ratio of observed incidence of hip fracture in patients with kidney failure to expected incidence
of hip fracture in the general population.
Adapted from Alem et al. Kidney Int. 2000;58:396-399.
0
5
10
100
<45 45-54 55-64 65-74 75-84 Total
Age (y)
Ob
serv
ed
/Exp
ecte
d
Incid
en
ce o
f H
ip F
ractu
re*
Male Relative Risk = 4.4Female Relative Risk = 4.4
Overall
15
20
80
100 8799
2520
10 10
7.56.4
2.4 2.54.4 4.4
M305
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
Cardiovascular Outcomes Worsen With CKD
Progression: 3-Y Follow-Up by eGFR Levels
CHF = congestive heart failure.Anavekar et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1285-1295.
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
Composite
End Point
Death From
CV Causes
Reinfarction CHF Stroke Resuscitation
Es
tim
ate
d E
ve
nt
Ra
te (
%)
75
60-74
45-59
<45P<0.001
eGFR (mL/min/1.73 m2)
M42
© 2005 The Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine.
3/17/2017
16
Early treatment can make a difference
100
10
0
No Treatment
Current Treatment
Early Treatment
4 7 9 11
Time (years)
Kidney Failure
GFR
(m
L/m
in/1
.73
2)
What can primary care providers do?
• Recognize and test at-risk patients
• Educate patients about CKD and treatment
• Focus on good glycemic control in people with
diabetes
• For those with CKD:
– Blood pressure below 130/80
– Use an ACE inhibitor or ARB
– More than one drug is usually required
– A diuretic should be part of the regimen
What can primary care providers do?(Continued)
• Monitor eGFR and UACR
• Treat cardiovascular risk, especially with smokers
and hypercholesterolemia
• Screen for anemia (Hgb), malnutrition (albumin),
metabolic bone disease (Ca, Phos, PTH)
• Refer to dietitian for nutritional guidance
• Consult or team with a nephrologist
• Encourage labs to report estimated eGFR and
urine albumin/creatinine ratios
3/17/2017
17
Nephrology referral suggestions
• To assist with diagnostic challenge (e.g. decision
to biopsy)
• To assist with therapeutic challenge (e.g. blood
pressure)
• Rapid decay of estimated GFR
• Most primary kidney diseases, (e.g.
glomerulonephridites)
• Preparation for renal replacement therapy,
especially when GFR less than 30
Nephrology referral suggestions, cont.
• Regardless of when you refer:
• Obtaining preliminary evaluation (e.g.
ultrasound, screening serologies)
• Providing consultant with patient history
including serial measures of renal function
Primary care providers –First line of defense against CKD
• Primary care professionals can play a significant
role in early diagnosis, treatment, and patient
education
• Therapeutic interventions for diabetic CKD are
similar to those required for optimal diabetes care
• Control of glucose, blood pressure, and
lipids
• A greater emphasis on detecting CKD, and
managing it prior to referral, can improve patient
outcomes
CKD is Part of Primary Care
3/17/2017
18
References
Anavekar NS, McMurray JJ, Velazquez EJ, Solomon SD, Kober L, Rouleau JL, White HD, Nordlander
R, Maggioni A, Dickstein K, Zelenkofske S, Leimberger JD, Califf RM, Pfeffer MA. Relation between
renal dysfunction and cardiovascular outcomes after myocardial infarction. New England Journal of
Medicine. 2004 Sep 23;351(13):1285-95.
Coresh J, Selvin E, Stevens LA, Manzi J, Kusek JW, Eggers P, Van Lente F, Levey AS. Prevalence of
chronic kidney disease in the United States. Journal of the American Medical Association. 2007 Nov
7;298(17):2038-47.
Giatras I, Lau J, Levey AS. Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of
nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme
Inhibition and Progressive Renal Disease Study Group. Annals of Internal Medicine. 1997 Sep
1;127(5):337-45.
Go AS, Chertow GM, Fan D, McCulloch CE, Chi-Yuan H. Chronic Kidney Disease and the Risks of
Death, Cardiovascular Events, and Hospitalization. New England Journal of Medicine. 2004 Sep
23;351(13):1296-1305.
Hogg RJ, Furth S, Lemley KV, Portman R, Schwartz GJ, Coresh J, Balk E, Lau J, Levin A, Kausz AT,
Eknoyan G, Levey AS; National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative.
National Kidney Foundation's Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative clinical practice guidelines for
chronic kidney disease in children and adolescents: evaluation, classification, and stratification.
Pediatrics. 2003 Jun;111(6 Pt 1):1416-21.
References
Ix JH, Shlipak MG, Liu HH, Schiller NB, Whooley MA. Association between renal insufficiency and
inducible ischemia in patients with coronary artery disease: the heart and soul study. Journal of the
American Society of Nephrology. 2003 Dec;14(12):3233-8.
Jafar TH, Schmid CH, Landa M, Giatras I, Toto R, Remuzzi G, Maschio G, Brenner BM, Kamper A,
Zucchelli P, Becker G, Himmelmann A, Bannister K, Landais P, Shahinfar S, de Jong PE, de Zeeuw D,
Lau J, Levey AS. Angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors and progression of nondiabetic renal
disease. A meta-analysis of patient-level data. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2001 Jul 17;135(2):73-87.
Erratum in: Ann Intern Med 2002 Aug 20;137(4):299.
Levey AS, Greene T, Sarnak MJ, Wang X, Beck GJ, Kusek JW, Collins AJ, Kopple JD. Effect of dietary
protein restriction on the progression of kidney disease: long-term follow-up of the Modification of Diet in
Renal Disease (MDRD) Study. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2006 Dec;48(6):879-88.
National Diabetes Information Clearinghouse. Diabetes Control and Complications Trial (DCCT).
Bethesda (MD): National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases, National Institutes of
Health, US Department of Health and Human Services; 1993 (NIH Publication No. 02-3874). Available
from: http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/control/.
National Kidney Disease Education Program. Manuscript submitted for review. 2008.
National Kidney Foundation. K/DOQI clinical practice guidelines for chronic kidney disease: evaluation,
classification, and stratification. American Journal of Kidney Diseases. 2002 Feb;39(2 Suppl 1):S1-266.
References
O'Hare AM, Bertenthal D, Covinsky KE, Landefeld CS, Sen S, Mehta K, Steinman MA, Borzecki A,
Walter LC. Mortality risk stratification in chronic kidney disease: one size for all ages? Journal of the
American Society of Nephrology. 2006 Mar;17(3):846-53.
Sarnak MJ, Greene T, Wang X, Beck G, Kusek JW, Collins AJ, Levey AS. The effect of a lower target
blood pressure on the progression of kidney disease: long-term follow-up of the modification of diet in
renal disease study. Annals of Internal Medicine. 2005 Mar 1;142(5):342-51.
Shlipak MG, Smith GL, Rathore SS, Massie BM, Krumholz HM. Renal function, digoxin therapy, and
heart failure outcomes: evidence from the digoxin intervention group trial. Journal of the American
Society of Nephrology. 2004 Aug;15(8):2195-203.
Stevens LA, Fares G, Fleming J, Martin D, Murthy K, Qiu J, Stark PC, Uhlig K, Van Lente F, Levey AS.
Low rates of testing and diagnostic codes usage in a commercial clinical laboratory: evidence for lack of
physician awareness of chronic kidney disease. Journal of the American Society of Nephrology. 2005
Aug;16(8):2439-48.
U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2006 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the
United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2006.
U.S. Renal Data System, USRDS 2007 Annual Data Report: Atlas of End-Stage Renal Disease in the
United States, National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney
Diseases, Bethesda, MD, 2007.