ciemat activities on frapcon/fraptran applications (2012-2013)
DESCRIPTION
CIEMAT ACTIVITIES on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013). Unit of Nuclear Safety R esearch Division of Nuclear Fission CIEMAT -Madrid Spain. MAIN ACTIVITIES. FRAPCON-3.4. FRAPTRAN-1.4. Ramps (SCIP). RIA (OECD). LOCA (HALDEN). - PowerPoint PPT PresentationTRANSCRIPT
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
CIEMAT ACTIVITIES on
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS(2012-2013)
Unit of Nuclear Safety ResearchDivision of Nuclear Fission
CIEMAT-MadridSpain
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
FRAPTRAN-1.4
RIA (OECD)
MAIN ACTIVITIES
Steady State UA (Impact on RIA modeling)
LOCA (HALDEN)
Ramps (SCIP)
FRAPCON-3.4
Extension to DS (FRAPCON-3.4xt)
TERMOMEC (CSN)AICAST (ENRESA)
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
MAIN ACTIVITIES
- FRAPCON-3.4xt application to predict cladding mechanical performance based on CFD calculations
DS
UA
RIA
LOCA
Ramps
- Impact of steady state uncertainties (FRAPCON) on RIA modeling calculations (SCANAIR)
- RIA fuel code Benchmark calculations (FRAPTRAN vs SCANAIR)
- FRAPTRAN capability to model power ramps from 3rd SCIP Benchmark
- Comparison with FRAPCON results applied to similar ramps from 2nd SCIP Benchmark
- FRAPTRAN capability to model HALDEN tests: IFA-650.xx
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
0.0001
0.001
0.01
0.1
1
10
100
1000
10000
40-25 40-45 60-25 60-45
Burnup (GWd/tU)-Storage time (years)
Re
lati
ve
inc
rem
en
t (%
)Creep
Dissolved H
F. Feria, J. Penalva, L.E. Herranz, “Thermo-mechanical analysis of cladding behaviour under cask blockage conditions”, Top Fuel 2013
FRAPCON-3.4xt application to predict cladding mechanical performance based on CFD calculations
Cask blockage
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
I. Sagrado, L.E. Herranz, “Impact of steady state uncertainties on RIA modeling calculations”, Top Fuel 2013
Impact of steady state uncertainties on RIA modeling calculations
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
FRAPTRAN capability to model power ramps from 3rd SCIP Benchmark
GE-1 Ramp (IFA-695.2)
285
290
295
300
305
310
315
320
325
330
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450Axial elevation (m)
T c
lad o
ute
r (º
C)
FRAPTRAN (Conditioning end)FRAPTRAN (Begin of final ramp step)FRAPTRAN (End of final ramp step)STUDSVIK data final ramp step t=26.5 h
6%
xM1 Ramp
326328330332334336338340342344346348
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500
Axial distance (m)
T c
lad o
ute
r (º
C)
FRAPTRAN (Conditioning end)FRAPTRAN (Begin of ramp)
FRAPTRAN (End of ramp)STUDSVIK data final ramp step t=8 min.
-0.95 %
GE-1, POST-RAMP RESULTS
0
0.1
0.2
0.3
0.4
0.5
0.6
0.7
0.8
0.9
1
0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450
Axial distance (mm)
DD
post
(%
)
Av. Measur.FRAPTRAN-1.4
Clad temperatures:
Strains:
I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Simulations of four Ramp Tests from SCIP Project with FRAPCON-3.4/FRAPTRAN1.4 Codes”, DFN/SN-xx/OP-13 Technical Report (In Progress)
xM2 Ramp
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Time after RTL(min)
Axi
al P
ow
er (
kW/m
)
0
300
600
900
1200
1500
1800
2100
2400
2700
3000
Elo
ng
atio
n (
mic
ron
s)Peak PPN (Output code)LHR (Studsvik data)Clad Elongation (Output code)Clad Elongation (EXP. DATA)
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
RIA fuel code Benchmark calculations (FRAPTRAN vs SCANAIR)
200
300
400
500
600
700
800
900
1000
1100
1200
0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.078 0.080 0.082 0.084
Time (s)
Fu
el c
ente
r te
mp
erat
ure
(C
)
FRAPTRAN-1.4
SCANAIR-7.1
0.0
0.2
0.4
0.6
0.8
1.0
1.2
0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.078 0.080 0.082 0.084
Time (s)
Cla
d h
oo
p s
trai
n (
%)
FRAPTRAN-1.4
SCANAIR-7.1
I. Sagrado, I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Analysis of Experimental RIA Scenarios: CIEMAT Contribution to the OECD RIA International Benchmark”, DFN/SN-02/OP-13. CIEMAT Technical Report
Nuclear Safety Research Unit
FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING
Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13
I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Modelización Post-Test del Experimento HALDEN IFA-650.10 con los Códigos de la serie FRAP”, SNE, 2013
FRAPTRAN capability to model HALDEN tests: IFA-650.xx
IFA-650.10 Test
0
150
300
450
600
750
900
1050
1200
-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600SECONDS (LOCA at t=0)
Cla
d T
em
p. (º
C)
0
10
20
30
40
50
60
70
80
90
Rod P
ress
ure
(bar)
TCC1TCC2TCC3 FRAP BOTTOMFRAP TOPFRAP PPN (fail)TCH1 Heater Temp lowerTCH2 Heater Temp middlePF1FRAP Press
BLO
WD
OW
N
Diff time failure pred-exp
EN
D F
RAPT S
IMU
L