ciemat activities on frapcon/fraptran applications (2012-2013)

9
Nuclear Safety Research Unit FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13 CIEMAT ACTIVITIES on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013) Unit of Nuclear Safety Research Division of Nuclear Fission CIEMAT-Madrid Spain

Upload: rebekah-spence

Post on 31-Dec-2015

30 views

Category:

Documents


3 download

DESCRIPTION

CIEMAT ACTIVITIES on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013). Unit of Nuclear Safety R esearch Division of Nuclear Fission CIEMAT -Madrid Spain. MAIN ACTIVITIES. FRAPCON-3.4. FRAPTRAN-1.4. Ramps (SCIP). RIA (OECD). LOCA (HALDEN). - PowerPoint PPT Presentation

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

CIEMAT ACTIVITIES on

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS(2012-2013)

Unit of Nuclear Safety ResearchDivision of Nuclear Fission

CIEMAT-MadridSpain

Page 2: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

FRAPTRAN-1.4

RIA (OECD)

MAIN ACTIVITIES

Steady State UA (Impact on RIA modeling)

LOCA (HALDEN)

Ramps (SCIP)

FRAPCON-3.4

Extension to DS (FRAPCON-3.4xt)

TERMOMEC (CSN)AICAST (ENRESA)

Page 3: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

MAIN ACTIVITIES

- FRAPCON-3.4xt application to predict cladding mechanical performance based on CFD calculations

DS

UA

RIA

LOCA

Ramps

- Impact of steady state uncertainties (FRAPCON) on RIA modeling calculations (SCANAIR)

- RIA fuel code Benchmark calculations (FRAPTRAN vs SCANAIR)

- FRAPTRAN capability to model power ramps from 3rd SCIP Benchmark

- Comparison with FRAPCON results applied to similar ramps from 2nd SCIP Benchmark

- FRAPTRAN capability to model HALDEN tests: IFA-650.xx

Page 4: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION

Page 5: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

0.0001

0.001

0.01

0.1

1

10

100

1000

10000

40-25 40-45 60-25 60-45

Burnup (GWd/tU)-Storage time (years)

Re

lati

ve

inc

rem

en

t (%

)Creep

Dissolved H

F. Feria, J. Penalva, L.E. Herranz, “Thermo-mechanical analysis of cladding behaviour under cask blockage conditions”, Top Fuel 2013

FRAPCON-3.4xt application to predict cladding mechanical performance based on CFD calculations

Cask blockage

Page 6: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

I. Sagrado, L.E. Herranz, “Impact of steady state uncertainties on RIA modeling calculations”, Top Fuel 2013

Impact of steady state uncertainties on RIA modeling calculations

Page 7: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

FRAPTRAN capability to model power ramps from 3rd SCIP Benchmark

GE-1 Ramp (IFA-695.2)

285

290

295

300

305

310

315

320

325

330

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450Axial elevation (m)

T c

lad o

ute

r (º

C)

FRAPTRAN (Conditioning end)FRAPTRAN (Begin of final ramp step)FRAPTRAN (End of final ramp step)STUDSVIK data final ramp step t=26.5 h

6%

xM1 Ramp

326328330332334336338340342344346348

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500

Axial distance (m)

T c

lad o

ute

r (º

C)

FRAPTRAN (Conditioning end)FRAPTRAN (Begin of ramp)

FRAPTRAN (End of ramp)STUDSVIK data final ramp step t=8 min.

-0.95 %

GE-1, POST-RAMP RESULTS

0

0.1

0.2

0.3

0.4

0.5

0.6

0.7

0.8

0.9

1

0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450

Axial distance (mm)

DD

post

(%

)

Av. Measur.FRAPTRAN-1.4

Clad temperatures:

Strains:

I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Simulations of four Ramp Tests from SCIP Project with FRAPCON-3.4/FRAPTRAN1.4 Codes”, DFN/SN-xx/OP-13 Technical Report (In Progress)

xM2 Ramp

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

-4 -2 0 2 4 6 8 10 12 14 16 18 20Time after RTL(min)

Axi

al P

ow

er (

kW/m

)

0

300

600

900

1200

1500

1800

2100

2400

2700

3000

Elo

ng

atio

n (

mic

ron

s)Peak PPN (Output code)LHR (Studsvik data)Clad Elongation (Output code)Clad Elongation (EXP. DATA)

Page 8: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

RIA fuel code Benchmark calculations (FRAPTRAN vs SCANAIR)

200

300

400

500

600

700

800

900

1000

1100

1200

0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.078 0.080 0.082 0.084

Time (s)

Fu

el c

ente

r te

mp

erat

ure

(C

)

FRAPTRAN-1.4

SCANAIR-7.1

0.0

0.2

0.4

0.6

0.8

1.0

1.2

0.060 0.062 0.064 0.066 0.068 0.070 0.072 0.074 0.076 0.078 0.080 0.082 0.084

Time (s)

Cla

d h

oo

p s

trai

n (

%)

FRAPTRAN-1.4

SCANAIR-7.1

I. Sagrado, I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Analysis of Experimental RIA Scenarios: CIEMAT Contribution to the OECD RIA International Benchmark”, DFN/SN-02/OP-13. CIEMAT Technical Report

Page 9: CIEMAT  ACTIVITIES  on FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN APPLICATIONS (2012-2013)

Nuclear Safety Research Unit

FRAPCON/FRAPTRAN USERS GROUP MEETING

Charlotte , NC (USA), 19.09.13

I. Vallejo, L.E. Herranz, “Modelización Post-Test del Experimento HALDEN IFA-650.10 con los Códigos de la serie FRAP”, SNE, 2013

FRAPTRAN capability to model HALDEN tests: IFA-650.xx

IFA-650.10 Test

0

150

300

450

600

750

900

1050

1200

-100 0 100 200 300 400 500 600SECONDS (LOCA at t=0)

Cla

d T

em

p. (º

C)

0

10

20

30

40

50

60

70

80

90

Rod P

ress

ure

(bar)

TCC1TCC2TCC3 FRAP BOTTOMFRAP TOPFRAP PPN (fail)TCH1 Heater Temp lowerTCH2 Heater Temp middlePF1FRAP Press

BLO

WD

OW

N

Diff time failure pred-exp

EN

D F

RAPT S

IMU

L