cih repairs and maintenance conference › resources › pdf › event pdfs › abbie pdfs ›...
TRANSCRIPT
CIH Repairs and
Maintenance conference Using repairs data to drive
improvement
Ian Lindsay
HouseMark Associate
Purpose
• Is it important?
• Have we got the right
definition?
• Is the data reported by our
contractors accurate?
• How do we compare?
• What can we do to get
better?
First time fix project
Method
• Why it is a key indicator
• The HouseMark definition
• Data audit
• Local benchmarking - limited
response
• Improvements
• Performance indicators - which are the right ones
• Data - how reliable is it
• Comparison
- definitions
- validation
- with whom?
- why?
• Analysis and improvement
So what about data…?
• The prescription of the Audit Commission has
gone in England
• Responsive regimes look different
- scrapping all but the emergency ‘priority’
- focusing on appointments
- same day repairs
- MOTs / planned on demand
- repairs days/batching response work
• Start from your objectives - customers, VfM, asset
maintenance
Performance indicators
If most customers want:
• Quick response to genuine
emergencies
• Someone to come once and fix
the problem
• That person to come when
they said they would
Then….
• Emergency response times
• First visit fix
• Appointments kept
As well as customer satisfaction
So….
VFM:
• Cost per job or per
property
• Average time to
undertake a repair
Maintain the asset:
• Overall cost of
maintenance
• ?
Repairs Storyboard
Correlations
As cost increases - satisfaction decreases
As time to undertake a repair increases - cost
increases
As time to repair increases - satisfaction decreases
A high first time fix rate
• Decreases cost
• Increases satisfaction
A high proportion of appointments kept
• Increases satisfaction
• But does not impact total cost
A low cost per property increases satisfaction
• With repairs overall
• With the last repair
Other correlations
Key, not just for PIs but also making operational decisions
Could be unreliable because:
• Systems
- capability
- failure
- set up
• People - hearts and minds
- cost e.g. materials
- what work have we done
- job coding
Data reliability
• Who does it?
• Why?
• Defensive benchmarking
- they don’t use the same definition as us
- we can’t trust their data
- we have to benchmark with a specific peer
group
- we don’t have to change!
Benchmarking
• Starts from a desire to improve
• Builds a picture of what good looks like
• Identifies those who might help you get there
• Seems to work if
- you actively seek out those who the data
shows perform well
- you have a group of like minded
organisations
- you marry insights from data and process
Successful benchmarking
Measuring repairs contribution to maintaining the stock
Focus of future work - where is the sweet spot
Improving our overall maintenance strategies
Meeting customer needs
VFM Maintaining the asset
• Be clearer about what data we need and how we’re
going to use it
• Make it auditable/reliable
• Get it in a shape we can use it
• Do the analysis and do something with it!
• Use reliable data as the basis of collaboration for
improved outcomes within the organisation and across
the sector as a whole
Using data to drive improvement