April 2011

ACINEM NN

Table of Contents

6 The Art of Documentary

10 Paul

4 Sequels

10 The Evolution of Romantic Comedy

7The New It Crowd

Cinemann 2

14 The Borgias

14 Cinemann Casts Jekyl and

Hyde

Dear Reader,

Welcome to the eighth issue of Cinemann!

In a relatively stagnant time for new movies, we will focus more on trends in the movie world with this issue. We will explore docu-mentary filmmaking, the rising of some im-presive young stars, and the different kinds of sequels that get made, among other things. While we hope these trends prove interesting, we also hope for some more exciting fare than what we have now to hit theaters in time for the next issue.

Yours Truly,

Andrew Demas and Maggie Reinfeld

Cinemann: Volume VI, Issue 8Editors in Chief

Andrew DemasMaggie Reinfeld

Senior EditorsMatt Taub

Alexandra Saali

Faculty AdvisorDeborah Kassel

Letter From the Editors

Associate Editors Katie Cacouris, Tucker Caploe, Jessica Chi, Zoe

Kestan,

Staff WritersAlice Taranto, Sam Torres,

Charles Sherr, Emma Specter, Hannah Jun

Contributing Writers Rachel Buissereth, Anise

Charles, David Feuerstein, Jacob Frackman, Abigail

Greenbaum, Bennett Heller, Noah Margulis, Jay Pale-kar, Savannah Smith, Ra-

chel Simerka-Smith, Henry Warder

Cinemann 3

Cinemann 4

The evolution and history of Se-quels and Trilogies is a fascinating one. There have been many, all with different reasons for being made: ar-tistic vision, visualization of a books series, and of course, making mon-ey.

Sequels almost always fall into one of these 5 categories: 1) a genu-inely good movie that is good inde-pendent of its predecessor (The God-father: Part II), 2) a decent movie that is somewhat original, but is en-joyable due mostly to nostalgia for the first one (the sequels of Toy Story and Wayne’s World) 3) a simply bad movie that doesn’t contain the same joke as the first one (Meet the Fo-

ckers and Little Fockers), or one in which none of the stars signed up for the sequel (Caddy Shack 2 lack-ing Bill Murray and Rodney Dan-gerfield), or a film with an entirely new theme (The Whole Ten Yards), 4) an intensely bad movie that is an obvious money grab (the sequels of Jaws and Major League), and 5) a truly insulting film that goes against everything for which the original stood (see Fletch Lives, Grease 2 and The Godfather: Part III).

Hollywood just keeps doing the same thing.

When one recalls the best com-edies of the last 20 years, set titles include Austin Powers (all three of

them), Old School, Zoolander, and of course, The Hangover. To anyone that knows sequels, it should come as no surprise that people are either in talks to make, in agreement to make, or are already working on se-quels for all of the above films. Same deal for some of the best action movies in recent years: The Bourne Legacy, The Dark Knight Rises and Avatars 2 and 3.

Not all of these movies are actu-ally going to end up getting made, but many of them will. It is a pretty safe bet that at least 60% of them will end up subpar, if not terrible. The most inexcusable to me are Austin Powers and The Bourne Leg-

imdb

imdb

Cinemann 5

acy (which won’t even have Matt Damon) because both of them have already made three reasonably good and successful movies, which should be enough.

I would like to think that these sequels will all be as good as the originals, as I thoroughly enjoyed most of the movies I have men-tioned, but I know better than to expect that. Unfortunately, most of them will be disappointing and won’t approach the quality of their predecessors.

The key to a good sequel is to not make the same movie in a different setting (à la Meet the Fockers), but

to create an entirely different movie while retaining the same feel as in the first (as in The Godfather: Part II). And when Hollywood actually manages to beat the odds and make a good sequel, people still remain un-satisfied. They still want to squeeze a little more money out of a movie franchise. As a result, each sequel, or threequel, or fourquel, just gets worse. You have to quit while you’re ahead. I think most of the Ameri-can public has realized this by now, but when will Hollywood? Maybe sometime after Hangover 6.

SequelsBy Ryan Thier

imdb

imdb

imdb

Movies are a momentary escape from the prob-lems of the world, a retreat from the chaos and confusion of real life. The reason that

we like fiction so much is that it is fake; the guns and explosions, though inspired by real-ity, are far from it. As much as we might not want to admit it, movies are incredibly unre-alistic and it is this fiction that we wrap our minds around. It is for this reason that docu-mentarians are such heroes. They won’t let our minds drift into fiction, they won’t let us es-cape into a world of gratuitous flames. Instead, they dedicate themselves to illuminating the human condition. Many of the documentary’s crew risk their lives and are even imprisoned for their efforts. Documentaries deserve spe-cial praise because they tell us what we do not want to hear, but what we need to hear. At the recent Academy Awards, the nominees for Best Documentary - Feature were Restre-po, Waste Land, Exit Through the Gift Shop, Gasland, and Inside Job; the latter of which won the Oscar. Of these nominees I have seen and enjoyed two of them. Restrepo, set in a remote outpost in the Korengal Valley of Afghanistan, tells a very real story about the realities of war, with much action compiled into a 90-minute

movie. Exit Through the Gift Shop chronicles the lives of the world’s most famous street art-ists and how street art has evolved over the past decade. Both of these films and in fact all of the films nominated for the award are shin-ning examples of a documentary genre that is increasing in importance.

In the past, documentaries have attracted thrill seekers like National Geographic. This is not to say that National Geographic does not make some great documentaries. Restre-po, for example, was a National Geographic film. Audiences who are newly willing to watch a documentary have lead to the rise of the genre. The watershed moment for the industry in recent times was An Inconvenient Truth, Al Gore’s film on the environment. It highlighted major social, cultural and political turmoil surrounding the issue. We might not have gone in with open arms to see the film, but it opened our eyes to the real issues. Re-strepo was a great film, I even watched it twice, and I can count on one hand the number of movies I have liked enough to watch twice. In the documentary world it is the equivalent to Mission Impossible, featuring plenty of action. The base where the filmmakers stayed saw threats every single day; they risked their lives to follow these soldiers everywhere they went.

I also loved Exit Through the Gift Shop,

whose intriguing title has absolutely noth-ing to do with what the movie is. For the past decade, a street artist who calls himself Mr. Brain Wash chronicled the lives of some of the world’s most famous street artists, includ-ing Bansky, whose work now sells for millions of dollars. The street art world is so secretive and such a niche culture that until now it has been closed to outsiders. In addition to shed-ding light on a very interesting walk of life, I found that Exit Through the Gift Shop proved both how important art is and how meaning-less it is. The main character and the man be-hind the camera, after recording the lives of others, decides to try to make himself into a word renowned street artist. After only a few months he sets up a successful show of his not particularly creative or original art, sell-ing over a million dollars worth of it in a week. This is contrasted with the efforts of artists like Bansky trying to open art to the common man traversing a street.

I found both of the films to be great and from what I have heard of the other nominees they are equally worthy of viewing. Docu-mentaries are the diamonds in the rough of the film world, often produced independently and lacking much clout, but they deserve your interest. From what I have seen they have earned it.

The Art of the DocumentaryBy Nicholas McCombe

Cinemann 6

coolhunting imdb

By Savannah Smith

The NewIT

CROWD

Cinemann 7

imdb

marked a new decade, but it also marked a new era of movies and a new group of movie stars. These ac-tors’ and actresses’ 2010 performances make them ones to keep an eye out for over the next few years: 2010

What he’s been in: In 2010, Eisenberg starred in The Social Network, also commonly known as “the Facebook movie,” which tells the back story of the world’s largest social net-working website. For his role as Mark Zuck-erberg, the genius, slightly obnoxious, and in the movie’s case, witty creator of Facebook, Eisenberg was nominated for an Oscar for Best Actor. Why he’s popular: Doing an amazing job playing the quick talking, random-fact-spurting Mark Zuckerberg is a big accomplish-ment that has earned him lots of talk. What’s coming up: In 2011, Eisenberg can be seen (or heard, in one case) in Rio and 30 Min-utes or Less.

Jesse Eisenberg

What she’s been in: In 2010, Mila Kunis played Lily in the psychological thriller Black Swan. Kunis also played a small role in the comedy Date Night and also has been the voice of Meg Griffin on Family Guy for the past twelve years. Why she’s popular: Well, for one she’s attractive. Also, she did an amazing job as the devious, cunning Lily in Black Swan. What’s coming up: In 2011, you can find Ku-nis starring in Friends With Benefits along-side Justin Timberlake.

Mila Kunis

What’s she’s been in: In 2010, Jennifer Law-rence starred as Ree in Winter’s Bone – giv-ing a performance that had her nominated for an Oscar in the Best Actress category. Why she’s popular: Getting nominated for an Oscar is enough to give any new actress lots of buzz and attention. What’s coming up: In 2011, you will be able to find Lawrence in The Beaver, House at the End of the Street, and X-Men: First Class.

Jennifer Lawrence

What she’s been in: Rooney Mara is the third young star on this list from The Social Network, in which she played Erica Albright, Zuckerberg’s ex-girlfriend. Some of her other past credits include: A Nightmare on Elm Street and Youth in Revolt. Why she’s popular: Her upcoming role as Lisbeth Salander in the adap-tation of hit book The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo was a very coveted one, and so the fact that she got it will likely make her a big name. What’s coming up: The Girl with the Dragon Tattoo.

Rooney Maraimdb

imdb

imdb

imdb

What she’s been in: In 2010, Emma starred in Easy A as the hilarious, sarcastic Olive Prendergast. Other past credits include Zombieland and The House Bunny. Why she’s popular: Spiderman, Easy A, and just being an overall good, hi-larious actress can all be attributed to why she’s popular. What’s coming up: Emma Stone has a huge career ahead. In 2011, you can find her in Crazy, Stupid, Love and the film adaption of The Help and in 2012 she will be star-ing alongside Andrew Garfield in the untitled Spider-Man Reboot.

Mila KunisWhat she’s been in: Hailee Stienfeld made her big screen debut this past winter playing Mattie Ross in True Grit - a performance that gave her an Os-car nomination for Best Supporting Actress. Oh yeah, and she’s only fourteen. Why she’s popular: Acting alongside famous names such as Jeff Bridges and Matt Damon in True Grit and not only holding her own, but shin-ing and doing a phenomenal job is a large feat – and not just because she’s only fourteen. What’s coming up: Nothing yet, but when an ac-tress this young has this much talent, we’re bound to see her again soon.

Hailee Steinfeld

What he’s been in: 2010 was a big year for Andrew Garfield. Eight days into 2010, The Imaginarium of Dr. Parnassus, in which Garfield played Anton, was released to the big screen. Later in 2010, Garfield played Tommy in the film Never Let Me Go. His 2010 resumé doesn’t end there, however. Garfield also per-formed alongside Eisenberg in The Social Network as Eduardo Saverin, Zuckerberg’s best friend and one of the co-founders of Facebook. Garfield got nominated for a Golden Globe for Best Supporting Actor for his performance in The Social Network. Why he’s popular: Andrew Garfield’s popu-lar ity can be attributed to a combination of many things. His role in The Social Network and the others films last year, being cast as the new Spider-Man, and being an attractive Brit can’t hurt. What’s coming up: We’ll have to wait anoth-er year, but in 2012 Garfield’s going to be taking over Tobey Maguire’s old role in the currently untitled Spider-Man Reboot.

Andrew Garfield

What’s she’s been in: In 2010, thirteen year-old Chloe Moretz played badass Hit-Girl in Kick Ass, Angie Stead-man in Diary of a Wimpy Kid, and Abby in the horror film Let Me In. Why she’s popular: Her performance of Hit-Girl in Kick Ass was pretty amazing – what other actresses could play a 12-year-old girl who beats up about 25 men at once, takes a bullet, uses weapons, and curses like a sailor? What’s coming up: Chloe Moretz has a busy year ahead. In 2011, she can be found in films such as: Hugo Cabret, Hick, The Devil and the Deep Blue Sea, and Mirlitons. Chloe Moretz

What he’s been in: Okay, so he wasn’t really in anything in 2010. However, he had two movies come out in early 2011. In February, he starred as John Smith in I Am Number Four, and in March he starred as Kyle in the film Beastly. Why he’s popular: British, handsome, and a talented actor, Alex Pettyfer has it all, including two films in two months – enough to spark chatter among moviegoing girls any-where. What’s coming up: Noth-ing definite quite yet (although there are a number of rumored roles), but from the looks of it we’re going to be seeing a lot of Pettyfer soon.

Alex Pettyfer

Emma Stone

imdb

imdb

imdb

imdb

imdb

On any one of our many snow days, people love to sit down, relax, and pop in a movie. A romantic comedy may make you laugh or cry, but a happy

ending is guaranteed. Typically they consist of two people who seem to have nothing in common, but through hilarious obstacles, find love. In the movies, finding love has been a humorous endeavor from the earli-est of time, with romantic comedies such as Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, and Rob Reiner’s The Princess Bride. Shakespeare’s comedy opened with two unknown lovers throwing insults and disses at each other. As the story progress-es, despite very emotional moments, we see the two lovers get set up by their friends in hilarious scenes. Later, the guards of the home miscommunicate the story bringing about much confusion, hence the name Much Ado About Nothing. The Princess Bride sees the two passionate lovers escaping from senseless

The Evolut ion of Romantic Comedy

Cinemann 10

By Sophie Dizengoff

com

ings

oon

The Evolut ion of Romantic Comedy

pirates, one of whom is an emo-tional giant. Comedy though, has changed throughout the years and now many romantic comedies take place in high schools, such as the popular new movie Easy A. As ru-mors spread, the importance of reputation becomes apparent to protagonist Olive. She embraces her newfound popularity and with a bold attitude allows herself to be misrepresented, throughout a series of funny moments. Like in all romantic comedies, love finds her and she rides off into the sun-set with her newfound love. The beauty is that despite a typical story line, every movie has a twist; whether it is that the love is where least expected like in the movie 27 Dresses, or found in a long lasting friendship like in 13 Going on 30. In 27 Dresses, Katherine Heigl plays the sister who is al-ways the second best, yet between

ridiculous fights and hilarious outfits she finds love where she never expect-ed to. Jennifer Garner stars in 13 Go-ing on 30, in which she learns that as life passes you by, you can never forget the important things. Throughout the evolution of film, romantic comedies have become known as “chick flicks,” but the two are completely different. Anything with romance is stereotyped as girly, hence the nickname, but the idea behind romantic com-edies versus plain romance is to mix love with humor, allow-ing anyone to sit down and laugh out loud. The cheesiness of love is blinded by the humor that comes with it, because lets face it, love can be funny. Whenever you see the

words “romantic comedy” do not think “chick flick,” think comedic love. Next time you’re debating which movie to watch, remember that romantic comedies, no matter how old, will always bring a smile.

Cinemann 11

By Sophie Dizengoff

bbc

Although the story of Jekyll and Hyde has already been adapted into a movie on five separate occasions rang-ing from a 1908 horror film to a 2006 straight-to-DVD about a medical student, no one version has stuck to the original story. The plot of Jekyll and Hyde is perfect for a movie, and another should be made, sticking closely to the book and with better direction and casting:

Cinemann’s Casting of Dr. Jekyl & Mr. Hyde

By Julia Pretsfelder

With experience in movies inspired by Gothic stories like Sleepy Hollow, Depp has shown that he can play crazy. His characters are usually offbeat, non-typical, and very memo-rable. It would be a nice change for him to play a seemingly normal and straight-laced character like Dr. Jekyll.

Depp could also play Hyde as even though Hyde and Je-kyll are supposed to look different, makeup or special effects could transform him. Depp plays mentally disturbed people very well, as he did in Sweeney Todd. Even without much makeup Depp transform through his acting skills.

HYDE JEKYL

Cinemann 12

cinemasource

bbc

Guy Ritchie would direct this movie very well because he adapted another Gothic novel, Sherlock Holmes into a film. He also uses physicality, important in the distinction between Je-kyll and Hyde, a lot in his movies, and sets a theme and mood for a movie with the setting, such as using London as a char-acter. He could use this to highlight the differences between Jekyll and Hyde through their environments and appearance.

Utterson, like Laurie’s famous TV character Dr. House, is a shrewd judge of character who obsesses over the personal lives of his friends. However, Utterson is more outwardly honest and caring. He isn’t very simi-lar to Laurie’s usually sardonic char-acter, so this role could be an interest-ing change for him.

Firth can play a somewhat rigid and old-fashioned, but good-hearted person very well, as he displayed in The King’s Speech. One of Lanyon’s main fixtures is his disapproval of Jekyll’s ex-perimentation with medicine. In nearly every part he plays, how-ever, Firth makes his characters very likeable.

UTTERSONLANYON

Laurie and Law would make a good pair because both usually play witty characters. Laurie’s House is inspired by Sherlock Holmes, while Law has recently played Holmes’s best friend, Watson. Enfield is similar to Utter-son, but as a younger man, he is less reserved and is more openly curious about other people, as he is about Mr. Hyde and Dr. Jekyll. Their wry acting styles could play.

ENFIELD

Cinemann 13

alla

bout

mad

onna

fox

imdb

cbc

Historical fiction novels are my favorite beach-read. Why? Because even though their plots and char-acters are typi-

cally no more sophisticated than those of the popular Gossip Girl series, I can justify my indulgence as “educational” since the word history is attached to the genre. Recently, shows like Spartacus and The Tudors have allowed me to sate my

thirst for trash (guilt free) via the televi-sion. Not surprisingly, I was ecstatic to learn that Showtime planned to chronicle the exploits of the infamous Borgia Fam-ily, whose members are amongst my all time favorite historical figures.

Director Neil Jordan’s new series opens with the dying words of Pope In-nocent VIII in 1492, speaking of the pa-pacy itself: “It was pure once. We have all sullied it with our greed and lechery. Which of you will wash it clean?” How-ever, Pope Innocent’s successor, Rodrigo Borgia, must have been a Satanist because

once elected Pope he did the very oppo-site. The Borgias recounts Rodrigo’s rise in power and the resultant effect of his as-cent on the entire Borgia family.

Main characters Rodrigo, his three sons (Cesare, Juan, and Joffre) and his ne-farious daughter Lucrezia, make for a dan-gerously seductive cast whose actions will not fail to continue shocking even jaded New Yorkers. While some critics have argued that the amorality of the charac-ters will prevent audiences from develop-ing an attachment to them and therefore hurt the series’ success, I disagree. Each

The Borgias

By Alexandra Saali

Cinemann 14

character is attractive enough and the show graphic enough to keep even the most disconnected viewer watching. The only time the series may drag is when too much emphasis and time is allotted to the politics of the Vatican. In addition to the original crime family themselves, the se-ries is crowded with a bounty of cardinals, mistresses and assassins. Believe me when I tell you everyone is on a self-serving mission, and holiness (especially chastity) is nothing but a front.

Cesare Borgia is perhaps the chief representative of the show’s sexual and

violent core. In fact, Cesare is the very man for whom the term “Machiavellian” was coined; Niccolo Machiavelli has cited The Prince as a representation of Cesare Borgia. Yet, my personal favorite member of the family is Lucrezia who is far from powerless. Instead she is perhaps the most dangerous weapon of the Borgia’s. If you thought Anne Boleyn was the ul-timate vixen of the Renaissance, you have no idea who Lucrezia Borgia is. Beauty, whit, sexual curiosity and an absent con-science make her a pernicious companion. Lucrezia- married thrice- is often accused

by historians of poisoning her father’s en-emies with arsenic she kept in a decadent ring. While teen classic Cruel Intentions is said to be modeled after Dangerous Lia-sons, I cannot help but wonder if Lucre-zia’s arsenic ring inspired director Roger Kumble’s take on Katharyn Merteull, who kept cocaine in her cross. Are you inter-ested yet? I know I’ll be watching every Sunday night.

Cinemann 15

pompanojosh

CinemannHorace Mann School231 West 246th StreetRiverdale, NY 10471