city ecosystems 20110711 v1
TRANSCRIPT
© 2011 IBM Corporation
IBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
City Ecosystems of the 21st Century
Jim Spohrer IBM University Programs WorldwideFor Stanford Global Innovation Ecosystem SummitJuly 11, 2011, San Jose, [email protected]
2 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Stanford MediaX Innovation Summit 2011 8:30 - 8:50 Welcome and Introductions
Martha Russell, Chuck House, Keith Devlin, Speakers and Moderators
8:50 - 10:15Environment and Infrastructure for InnovationModerator: Marguerite Hancock --Torger Reve, Knowledge-Based Norway--Jim Spohrer, City Ecosystems of the 21st Century --Norman Jacknis, Media Infrastructures for Regional Innovation, Cisco
10:15 - 10:45Posters, Camilla YuBreak and Networking
10:45 - NoonOrganizational Systems for InnovationModerator: Kaisa Still--John Roese, The Global Enterprise as an Innovation Ecosystem--Willem Jonker, EIT ICT Labs: A new European Approach to ICT Innovation Ecosystems--Yan Xu, Ubiquitous Innovation Ecosystems
Noon - 1:00 pmLunch and Networking
1:00 - 2:00Resource Networks - Employment and Investment in GreentechModerator: Martha Russell--Stephen Eichenlaub, The Corporate Investment Ecosystem--Deepak Jeevankumar, The Venture Capital Ecosystem--Greg Callman, Angels/Agencies: First Mover Advantages/Responsibilities
2:00 - 2:20Break and Networking
2:20 - 3:45Analyzing and Visualizing NetworksModerators: Jukka Huhtamaki, Neil Rubens--Kimihiko Iwamura, Anatomy of a Personal Network--Mathieu Bastian, Using Gephi to Show LinkedIn and Other Networks--Sean Gourley, Locating Strategic Opportunities with Technology Mapping--Rahul Basole, Network Perspectives: the Converging Mobile Sector3:45 - 4:30Knowledge Transfer in Innovation EcosystemsModerator: Martha Russell --Egils Milburg, Indicators for Shared Vision--Dan Wang, Indicators for Brain Drain and Brain Gain--Chenyang Xu, Insights from Global Scouting, Working with Universitie/Startups
3 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
IBM operates in 170 countries around the globe
IBM has 425,000 employees worldwide 2010 Financials
Revenue - $ 99.9B Net Income - $ 14.8B EPS - $ 11.52 Net Cash - $11.7B
21% of IBM’s revenue in growth market countries; growing at 13% in late 2010
Number 1 in patent generation for 18 consecutive years ; 5,896 US patents awarded in 2010
More than 40% of IBM’s workforce conducts business away from an office
5 Nobel Laureates
9 time winner of the President’s National Medal of Technology & Innovation - latest award for Blue Gene Supercomputer
“Let’s Build a Smarter Planet"
The Smartest Machine On Earth
100 Years of Business & Innovation
4 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Cities
“Cities are the defining artifacts of civilisation. All the achievements and failings of humanity are here… We shape the city, and then it shapes us. Today, almost half the global population lives in cities.”
– John Reader, author of Cities
IBM Releases ``IBM and the Future of our Cities'' Podcast
– IBM Press Release 2005
5 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Urban-Age.Net
Currently, the world’s top 30 cities generate 80% of the world’s wealth.The Urban Age
For the first time in history more than 50% the earth’s population live in cities - by 2050 it will be 75%The Endless City
6 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Overview: Elements of Interest
Infrastructure & Environment(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life & Demographics(Careers)
Policies & InvestmentsRun-Transform-Innovate
Governance
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
Infrastructure(Technologies Deployed)
Individuals &Certified
Competences(Skills)
Institutions &Roles(Jobs)
Information, Quality-of-Life Demographics(Careers)
City Ecosystem 1 City Ecosystem 2
Futur
eP
resent
Histor
y
Policies & InvestmentsRun-Transform-Innovate
Governance
Policies & InvestmentsRun-Transform-Innovate
Governance
Policies & InvestmentsRun-Transform-Innovate
Governance
Policies & InvestmentsRun-Transform-Innovate
Governance
FrameworksTheoriesModels
7 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
CityOne Game to Learn “CityInvesting”Serious Game to teach problem solving for real issues in key industries, helping companies to learn how to work smarter. Energy, Water, Banking, Retail
http://www.ibm.com/cityone
8
Universities connect information flows between city ecosystems
World as System of SystemsWorld (light blue - largest)Nations (green - large)Regions (dark blue - medium)Cities (yellow - small)Universities (red - smallest)
Cities as System of Systems-Transportation & Supply Chain-Water & Waste Recycling-Food & Products ((Nano)-Energy & Electricity-Information/ICT & Cloud (Info)-Buildings & Construction-Retail & Hospitality/Media & Entertainment-Banking & Finance-Healthcare & Family (Bio)-Education & Professions (Cogno)-Government (City, State, Nation)
Nations: Innovation Opportunities- GDP/Capita (level and growth rate)- Energy/Capita (fossil and renewable)
Developed MarketNations
(> $20K GDP/Capita)
Emerging MarketNations
(< $20K GDP/Capita)
IBM UP WW: Tandem Awards: Increasing university linkages (knowledge exchange interactions)
9 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Data: And therefore, why higher education matters (to nations)% WW GDP and % WW Top-500-Universities
Japan
ChinaGermany
France
United KingdomItaly
Russia SpainBrazilCanada
IndiaMexico AustraliaSouth Korea
NetherlandsTurkey
Sweden
y = 0,7489x + 0,3534R² = 0,719
0
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9
% g
loba
l G
DP
% top 500 universities
Strong Correlation (2009 Data): National GDP and University Rankingshttp://www.upload-it.fr/files/1513639149/graph.html
10
University Trend: More Locally Connected Research Centers
University sub-systemsDisciplines in Schools (circles)Innovation Centers (squares)
E.g., CMU Website (2009)“Research Centers:where it all happens – to solve real-world problems”
Disciplines in SchoolsAward degreesSingle-discipline focusResearch discipline problems
Innovation Centers (ICs)Industry/government sponsorsMulti-disciplinary teamsResearch real-world systems
D
D
D
D
D
D
Engine
ering
Schoo
l
Social
Scie
nces
,
Human
ities
Professional
Studies
Business School
water & waste transportation
health energy/grid
e-government
Science &
Mathem
atics
I-School
Design
food & supply chain
11 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM UP (University Programs) WW
UNIVERSITIES:Research Centers & Real-World Systems
CITIES/METRO REGIONS:Universities Key to Long-Term Economic Development
Accelerating Regional Innovation: Universities as “Living Labs” for Host Cities
12 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM UP (University Programs) WW
Edu-Impact.Com: Growing Importance of Universities with Large, Growing Endowments
“When we combined the impact of Harvard’s direct spending on payroll, purchasing and construction – the indirect impact of University spending – and the direct and indirect impact of off-campus spending by Harvard students – we can estimate that Harvard directly and indirectly accounted for nearly $4.8 billion in economic activity in the Boston area in fiscal year 2008, and more than 44,000 jobs.”
13 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM UP (University Programs) WW
Holistic Product-Service-Systems& Regional Innovation Ecosystems http://www.service-science.info/archives/1056
Examples: Nations, States, Cities, Universities, Luxury Hotels, Cruise Ships, Households
“Whole Service” Subsystems: Transportation, Water, Food, Energy, Communications, Buildings, Retail, Finance, Health, Education, Governance, etc.
Definition: A service system that can support its primary populations, independent of all external service systems, for some period of time, longer than a month if necessary, and in some cases, indefinitely
Balance independence with interdependence, without becoming overly dependent (outsourcing limits, maximum re-cycling for sustainability)
Nation
State/Province
City/Region
HospitalMedicalResearch
UniversityCollegesK-12
LuxuryResortHotels
Family(household)
Person(professional)
For-profits
Non-profits
Start-UpsNew Ventures
~25-50% of start-ups are newIT-enabled service offerings
SaaSPaaSIaaS
http://www.thesrii.org
14 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM UP (University Programs) WW
World Population & Holistic Product-Service System Scaling
15 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Systems-Disciplines Matrix: Advanced Organizer
Systems Focus– Flows
– Human Development
– Governance
Disciplines Focus– Stakeholders
– Resources
– Change
– Value
Stakeholders
Resources
Change
Value
Flow
s Hum
an D
evelopment
Governanc
e Governanc
e
Systems
Discipline
s
16 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Systems-Disciplines Matrix: Scope of Service ScienceSystems that focus on flows of things Systems that governSystems that support people’s activities
transportation & supply chain water &
waste
food &products
energy & electricity
building & construction
healthcare& family
retail &hospitality banking
& finance
ICT &cloud
education &work
citysecure
statescale
nationlaws
social sciences
behavioral sciences
management sciences
political sciences
learning sciences
cognitive sciences
system sciences
information sciences
organization sciences
decision sciences
run professions
transform professions
innovate professions
e.g., econ & law
e.g., marketing
e.g., operations
e.g., public policy
e.g., game theory and strategy
e.g., psychology
e.g., industrial eng.
e.g., computer sci
e.g., knowledge mgmt
e.g., stats & design
e.g., knowledge worker
e.g., consultant
e.g., entrepreneur
stake
holders Customer
Provider
Authority
Competitors
resources
People
Technology
Information
Organizations
change History
(Data Analytics)
Future(Roadmap)
value
Run
Transform(Copy)
Innovate(Invent)
Starting Point 1: Observing the Stakeholders (As-Is)
Starting Point 2: Observing their Resources & Access (As-Is)
Change Potential: Thinking (Has-Been & Might-Become)
Value Realization: Doing (To-Be)
disciplines
systems
17 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
The Goal: Adaptive Innovators, so called T-shaped professionalsReady for Life-Long-LearningReady for T-eamworkReady to build a Smarter Planet
SSME+D = Service Science, Management, Engineering + Design
Many disciplines(understanding & communications)
Many systems(understanding & communications)
Deep in one discipline
(ana
lytic thinking & problem
solving)
Deep in one system
(analytic thinking & problem
solving)
Many multi-cultural-team service projects completed(resume: outcomes, accomplishments & awards)
BREADTH
DE
PT
H
18 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Data: Why and how technology is changing jobs
-10
-5
0
5
10
15
1969 1974 1979 1984 1989 1994 1999
Levy, F, & Murnane, R. J. (2004). The New Division of Labor: How Computers Are Creating the Next Job Market. Princeton University Press.
Expert Thinking
Complex Communication
Routine Manual
Non-routine Manual
Routine Cognitive
Why: Technology replaces many routinehuman activities (provider economics)
19 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Our ambition is to reach K-12 students with Service Science & STEM: Smarter Planet: “The systems we live in, and the systems we are…”
“Imagine smarter systems, explain why better (service systems & STEM language)”STEM = Science, Technology, Engineering, and MathematicsSee NAE K-12 engineering report: http://www.nap.edu/catalog.php?record_id=12635
See Challenge-Based Learning: http://www.nmc.org/news/nmc/nmc-study-confirms-effectiveness-challenge-based-learning
Challenge-based Project to Design Improved Service Systems
– K - Transportation & Supply Chain
– 1 - Water & Waste Recycling
– 2 - Food & Products (Nano)
– 3 - Energy & Electric Grid
– 4 – Information/ICT & Cloud (Info)
– 5 - Buildings & Construction
– 6 – Retail & Hospitality/Media & Entertainment (tourism)
– 7 – Banking & Finance/Business & Consulting
– 8 – Healthcare & Family Life/Home (Bio)
– 9 – Education /Campus & Work Life/Jobs & Entrepreneurship (Cogno)
– 10 – City (Government)
– 11 – State/Region (Government)
– 12 – Nation (Government)
– Higher Ed – T-shaped depth added, cross-disciplinary project teams
– Professional Life – Adaptive T-shaped life-long-learning & projects
Systemsthat focus onGoverning
Systemsthat focus on
Human Activities andDevelopment
Systemsthat focus onFlow of things
20 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Smarter = Sustainable Innovation (reduce waste, expand capabilities)
Computational System
Building Smarter TechnologiesRequires investment roadmap
Service Systems: Stakeholders & Resources
1. People/Individuals 2. Technology & Environment/Infrastructure3. Shared Information4. Organizations/Institutions
connected by win-win value propositions
Building Smarter Universities & CitiesRequires investment roadmap
21 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM UP (University Programs) WW
Thank-You! Questions?
Dr. James (“Jim”) C. SpohrerDirector, IBM University Programs (IBM UP) [email protected]
“Instrumented, Interconnected, Intelligent – Let’s build a Smarter Planet.” – IBM“If we are going to build a smarter planet, let’s start by building smarter cities” – CityForward.org“Universities are major employers in cities and key to urban sustainability.” – Coalition of USU
“Cities learning from cities learning from cities.” – Fundacion Metropoli“The future is already here… It is just not evenly distributed.” – Gibson
“The best way to predict the future is to create it/invent it.” – Moliere/Kay“Real-world problems may not/refuse to respect discipline boundaries.” – Popper/Spohrer
“Today’s problems may come from yesterday’s solutions.” – Senge“History is a race between education and catastrophe.” – H.G. Wells
“The future is born in universities.” – Kurilov“Think global, act local.” – Geddes
22
Time
ECOLOGY
14BBig Bang
(NaturalWorld)
10KCities
(Human-MadeWorld)
sun (energy)
writing(symbols and scribes,
stored memoryand knowledge)
earth(molecules &
stored energy)
written laws(governance and
stored control)
bacteria(single-cell life)
sponges(multi-cell life)
money(governed
transportable valuestored value,
“economic energy”)
universities(knowledge workers)
clams (neurons)trilobites (brains)
printing press (books)steam engine (work)200M
bees (socialdivision-of-labor)
60
transistor(routine
cognitive work)
Where is the “Real Science” - mysteries to explain?In the many sciences that study the natural and human-made worlds…
Unraveling the mystery of evolving hierarchical-complexity in new populations…To discover the world’s architectures and mechanisms for computing non-zero-sum
Entity Architectures (ЄN) of nested, networked Holistic-Product-Service-Systems (HPSS)
23 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
A Game of Life: Essentials
Game = board with squares & rules– Infrastructure both Environmental and Technological
• PS (Physical Systems - Environment)– Natural Endowment (hidden & observable information)
• PSS (Physical Symbol Systems – Environment & Technology)– Biological PSS (observable information – DNA, RNA, proteins, etc.)– Technological PSS (observable information – states of system, bits, etc.)
Life = multiple generations of entities– Entities = SSE (Service System Entities)
• Individuals with Competencies & Life-Spans– Competencies (vary with age)– Life-Spans (vary with stage)
• Institutions with Roles & Rules– Roles (Competency-Levels and Pay-Levels)– Rules (Compliance-Levels and Tax-Levels)
Physical
Not-Physical
Rights No-Rights
2. Technology/EnvironmentalInfrastructure
4. SharedInformation
1. People/Individuals
3. Organizations/Institutions
1. Dynamically configure resources (4 I’s)
24 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Life = Multiple Generations of Entities (200 years = 10 generations x 20 years)Pedagogy: Ten Social-Technological-Economic-Environmental-Political (STEEP) StagesThought Experiment: Binary-Board-Space (Rule: Toggles Each Generation)
1. Hunter-Gatherer Knowledge-Value Economy 1- 2K population (20 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
2. Transition Hunter-Gatherer Knowledge-Value Economy 2- 4K population (40 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
3. Agricultural Knowledge-Value Economy 1- 8K population (80 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
4. Transition Agricultural Knowledge-Value Economy 2- 16K population (160 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
5. Manufacturing Knowledge-Value Economy 1- 32K population (320 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
6. Transition Manufacturing Knowledge-Value Economy 2- 64K population (640 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
7. Service-Information Knowledge-Value Economy 1- 128K population (1,280 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
8. Transition Service-Information Knowledge-Value Economy 2- 256K population (2,560 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
9. Sustainable-Innovation Knowledge-Value Economy 1- 512K population (5,120 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
10.Transition Sustainable-Innovation Knowledge-Value Economy 2- 1024K population (10,240 people/sq mile * 100 sq miles)
11. And beyond!
10 miles
In Use
Recycle
Rule:Toggles EachGeneration
25 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Game = Board with Squares & Rules Example: Possible STEEP Stages 9 & 10 (infrastructure, sustainable-innovation cities)
Imagine nested holistic product-service-systems entities…– 10 Continents/planet
– 10 Nations/continent
– 10 States/nation
– 10 Cities/state
– 4 Sectors/city (interconnect to others)
– 11 Systems/sector
Rules: Board-space toggles each generation– 20 years/generation
– New infrastructure/generation
World: Further Pedagogical Purposes– “World Simulator” benchmarking
– Search to accelerate learning • 10,000 city experiments/generation• Low skill/raw materials > Hi-talent/tech
– Each generation new outcomes• Talents (skills & jobs)• Technologies (recycle & rebuild)• Investments (script & performance)
Occupied(In Use)
Recycling(De-construction &
Re-construction)
waterfood/products
energyICT
R&H/M&E/C&Sfinancehealth
educationgovernance
transportation
buildings/family
Sector 1city
interconnect
11 Systems
Sector 2state
interconnect
Sector 3nation
interconnect
Sector 4continent
interconnect
Toggle each generation – 20 year
cycle
26 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Entities = Life-Cycle Script Example: Possible STEEP Stages 9 & 10 (individuals, multiple generations of entities)
Children – Age 0-20– (Local & Global) Grow, Learn, & Have Fun
Parents – Age 20-40 (offspring 2)– (Next Local) Reproduce, Raise Children, & Build New “City” SET Stage
Grand-Parents – Age 40-60 (offspring 4)– (Local) Run the “City” You Built & Connect with Family
Great-Grand-Parents – Age 60-80 (offspring 8)– (Global) Travel the World, Enjoy Experiences, & Share Ideas
Great-Great-Grand-Parents – Age 80-100 (offspring 16)– (Local) Return, Reconnect, and Document History & Future Plans
Great-Great-Great-Grand-Parents – Age 100-120 (offspring 32)– (Local & Global) Celebrate, Tell Stories, Depart & Explore Further Realms
27 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
The Game of Life: Service Science Framework
The Game Board: A configuration of PS (Physical Systems), with interspersed PSS (Physical Symbol Systems) and SSE (Service System Entities).
– The SSE are PSS are PS
– The infrastructure is PS + PSS
• The PS have hidden information (state)• The PSS have observable information (state and read-write)
– The SSE use information to co-create value
• World model – information about the world (The Game Board)• Self model – information about self (SSE)• The SSE have a beginning and an end (life-cycle)• The SSE judge quality-of-life across their life-cycle
– The game is each generation of SSE try to improve quality-of-life, by improving the capabilities of the infrastructure (less waste, more support for SSE activities) and the capabilities of the SSE to co-create value (an SSE activity)
– The starting game board consists of PS with a few PSS, and the goal is to see how quickly and with how little energy and with how few types and tokens of PS, the PSS can become SSE and reconstruct a high level infrastructure and high quality of life and continuously improve at a sustainable pace.
• Processes of valuing are based on the above
28 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Quality-of-Life measures continuously improveQuality-of-Life = Quality-of-Service + Quality-of-Jobs + Quality-of Investments-Returns
A. Systems that focus on flow of things that humans need (~15%*)1. Transportation & supply chain
2. Water & waste recycling/Climate & Environment
3. Food & products manufacturing
4. Energy & electricity grid/Clean Tech
5. Information and Communication Technologies (ICT access)B. Systems that focus on human activity and development (~70%*)
6. Buildings & construction (smart spaces) (5%*)
7. Retail & hospitality/Media & entertainment/Tourism & sports (23%*)
8. Banking & finance/Business & consulting (wealthy) (21%*)
9. Healthcare & family life (healthy) (10%*)
10. Education & work life/Professions & entrepreneurship (wise) (9%*)C. Systems that focus on human governance - security and opportunity (~15%*)
11. Cities & security for families and professionals (property tax)
12. States/regions & commercial development opportunities/investments (sales tax)
13. Nations/NGOs & citizens rights/rules/incentives/policies/laws (income tax)
20/10/10
0/19/0
2/7/42/1/1
7/6/11/1/0
5/17/27
1/0/2
24/24/1
2/20/247/10/3
5/2/2
3/3/10/0/0
1/2/2
Quality of Life = Quality of Service + Quality of Jobs + Quality of Investment-Opportunities
* = US Labor % in 2009.
“61 Service Design 2010 (Japan) / 75 Service Marketing 2010 (Portugal)/78 Service-Oriented Computing 2010 (US)”
29 © 2010 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
What is service science? A service system? The ABC’s?
Economics & Law
Design/ Cognitive Science Systems
Engineering
OperationsComputer Science/
Artificial Intelligence
Marketing
“a service system isa human-made system to improve
provider-customer interactionsand value-cocreation outcomes,
studied by many disciplines,one piece at a time.”
“service science isthe transdisciplinary study of
service systems &value-cocreation”
The ABC’s:The provider (A)
and a customer (B)transform a target (C)
30 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service Systems Thinking: ABC’s
A. Service Provider
• Individual• Institution• Public or Private
A. Service Provider
• Individual• Institution• Public or Private
C. Service Target: The reality to be transformed or operated on by A, for the sake of B
• Individuals or people, dimensions of • Institutions or business and societal organizations,
organizational (role configuration) dimensions of• Infrastructure/Product/Technology/Environment,
physical dimensions of• Information or Knowledge, symbolic dimensions
C. Service Target: The reality to be transformed or operated on by A, for the sake of B
• Individuals or people, dimensions of • Institutions or business and societal organizations,
organizational (role configuration) dimensions of• Infrastructure/Product/Technology/Environment,
physical dimensions of• Information or Knowledge, symbolic dimensions
B. Service Customer
• Individual• Institution• Public or Private
B. Service Customer
• Individual• Institution• Public or Private
Forms ofOwnership Relationship
(B on C)
Forms ofService Relationship(A & B co-create value)
Forms ofResponsibility Relationship
(A on C)
Forms ofService Interventions
(A on C, B on C)
Spohrer, J., Maglio, P. P., Bailey, J. & Gruhl, D. (2007). Steps toward a science of service systems. Computer, 40, 71-77.From… Gadrey (2002), Pine & Gilmore (1998), Hill (1977)
Vargo, S. L. & Lusch, R. F. (2004). Evolving to a new dominant logic for marketing. Journal of Marketing, 68, 1 – 17.
“Service is the application ofcompetence for the benefitof another entity.”
Example Provider: College (A)Example Target: Student (C)Discuss: Who is the Customer (B)?- Student? They benefit…- Parents? They often pay…- Future Employers? They benefit…- Professional Associations?- Government, Society?
A B
C
31 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service Science: Conceptual Framework
Resources: Individuals, Institutions, Infrastructure, Information Stakeholders: Customers, Providers, Authorities, Competitors Measures: Quality, Productivity, Compliance, Sustainable Innovation Access Rights: Own, Lease, Shared, Privileged
Ecology(Populations & Diversity)
Entities(Service Systems, both Individuals & Institutions)
Interactions(Service Networks,
link, nest, merge, divide)
Outcomes(Value Changes, both
beneficial and non-beneficial)
Value Proposition (Offers & Reconfigurations/
Incentives, Penalties & Risks)
Governance Mechanism (Rules & Constraints/
Incentives, Penalties & Risks)
Access Rights(Relationships of Entities)
Measures(Rankings of Entities)
Resources(Competences, Roles in Processes,
Specialized, Integrated/Holistic)
Stakeholders(Processes of Valuing,
Perspectives, Engagement)
Identity(Aspirations & Lifecycle/
History)
Reputation(Opportunities & Variety/
History)
prefer sustainable non-zero-sum
outcomes,i.e., win-win
win-win
lose-lose win-lose
lose-win
Spohrer, JC (2011) On looking into Vargo and Lusch's concept of generic actors in markets, or“It's all B2B …and beyond!” Industrial Marketing Management, 40(2), 199–201.
32 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities configure four types of resources
First foundational premise of service science:
– Service system entities dynamically configurefour types of resources
– Resources are the building blocks of entity architectures
Named resources are:– Physical or – Not-Physical– Physicist resolve disputes
Named resources have:– Rights or– No Rights– Judges resolve disputes
Spohrer, J & Maglio, P. P. (2009) Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet. In Introduction to Service Engineering. Editors Karwowski & Salvendy. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ..
Physical
Not-Physical
Rights No-Rights
2. Technology/EnvironmentInfrastructure
4. SharedInformation/
SymbolicKnowledge
1. People/Individuals
3. Organizations/Institutions
Formal service systems can contract to configure resources/apply competenceInformal service systems can promise to configure resources/apply competence
Trends & Countertrends (Balance Chaos & Order):(Promise) Informal <> Formal (Contract)
(Relationships & Attention) Social <> Economic (Money & Capacity)(Power) Political <> Legal (Rules)
(Evolved) Natural <> Artificial (Designed)(Creativity) Cognitive Labor <> Information Technology (Routine)
(Dance) Physical Labor <> Mechanical Technology (Routine)(Relationships) Social Labor <> Transaction Processing (Routine)
(Atoms) Transportation <> Communication (Bits)(Tacit) Qualitative <> Quantitative (Explicit)
(Secret) Private <> Public (Shared)(Anxiety-Risk) Challenge <> Routine (Boredom-Certainty)
(Mystery) Unknown <> Known (Justified True Belief)
33 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities calculate value from multiple stakeholder perspectives
Second foundational premise of service science
– Service system entities calculate value from multiple stakeholder perspectives
– Value propositions are the building blocks of service networks
A value propositions can be viewed as a request from one service system to another to run an algorithm (the value proposition) from the perspectives of multiple stakeholders according to culturally determined value principles.
The four primary stakeholder perspectives are: customer, provider, authority, and competitor
– Citizens: special customers– Entrepreneurs: special providers– Parents: special authority– Criminals: special competitors
Spohrer, J & Maglio, P. P. (2009) Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet. In Introduction to Service Engineering. Editors Karwowski & Salvendy. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ. .
Model of competitor: Does it put us ahead? Can we stay ahead? Does it differentiate us from the competition?
Will we?(invest tomake it so)
StrategicSustainable Innovation(Marketshare)
4.Competitor(Substitute)
Model of authority: Is it legal? Does it compromise our integrity in any way? Does it create a moral hazard?
May we?(offer anddeliver it)
RegulatedCompliance(Taxes andFines, Quality of Life)
3.Authority
Model of self: Does it play to our strengths? Can we deliver it profitably to customers? Can we continue to improve?
Can we?(deliver it)
CostPlus
Productivity(Profit, Mission, Continuous Improvement, Sustainability)
2.Provider
Model of customer: Do customers want it? Is there a market? How large? Growth rate?
Should we?(offer it)
ValueBased
Quality(Revenue)
1.Customer
ValuePropositionReasoning
BasicQuestions
PricingDecision
MeasureImpacted
StakeholderPerspective(the players)
Value propositions coordinate & motivate resource access
34 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities reconfigure access rights to resources by mutually agreed to value propositions
Third foundational premise of service science
– Service system entities reconfigure access rights to resources by mutually agreed to value propositions
– Access rights are the building blocks of the service ecology (culture and information)
Access rights– Access to resources that are
owned outright (i.e., property)– Access to resource that are
leased/contracted for (i.e., rental car, home ownership via mortgage, insurance policies, etc.)
– Shared access (i.e., roads, web information, air, etc.)
– Privileged access (i.e., personal thoughts, inalienable kinship relationships, etc.)
service = value-cocreationB2BB2CB2GG2CG2BG2GC2CC2BC2G***
provider resourcesOwned OutrightLeased/ContractShared Access
Privileged Access
customer resourcesOwned OutrightLeased/ContractShared Access
Privileged Access
OO
SA
PA
LC
OO
LC
SA
PA
S AP C
Competitor Provider Customer Authority
value-proposition change-experience dynamic-configurations
(substitute)
time
Spohrer, J & Maglio, P. P. (2009) Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet. In Introduction to Service Engineering. Editors Karwowski & Salvendy. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ..
35 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities interact to create ten types of outcomes
Four possible outcomes from a two player game
ISPAR generalizes to ten possible outcomes
– win-win: 1,2,3– lose-lose: 5,6, 7, maybe 4,8,10– lose-win: 9, maybe 8, 10– win-lose: maybe 4
lose-win(coercion)
win-win(value-cocreation)
lose-lose(co-destruction)
win-lose(loss-lead)
Win
L
ose
Pro
vide
r
Lose WinCustomer
ISPAR descriptive model
Maglio PP, SL Vargo, N Caswell, J Spohrer: (2009) The service system is the basic abstraction of service science. Inf. Syst. E-Business Management 7(4): 395-406 (2009)
36 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities learn to systematically exploit technology:Technology can perform routine manual, cognitive, transactional work
L
Learning Systems(“Choice & Change”)
Exploitation(James March)
Exploration(James March)
Run/Practice-Reduce(IBM)
Transform/Follow(IBM)
Innovate/Lead(IBM)
Operations Costs
Maintenance Costs
Incidence Planning & Response Costs (Insure)
Incremental
Radical
Super-Radical
Internal
External
Interactions
“To bethe best,
learn fromthe rest”
“Doublemonetize,
internal winand ‘sell’ to
external”
“Try tooperateinside
thecomfortzone”
March, J.G. (1991) Exploration and exploitation in organizational learning. Organizational Science. 2(1).71-87.Sanford, L.S. (2006) Let go to grow: Escaping the commodity trap. Prentice Hall. New York, NY.
37 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service system entities are physical-symbol systems
Service is value cocreation.
Service system entities reason about value.
Value cocreation is a kind of joint activity.
Joint activity depends on communication and grounding.
Reasoning about value and communication are (often) effective symbolic processes.
Newell, A (1980) Physical symbol systems, Cognitive Science, 4, 135-183.
Newell, A & HA Simon(1976). Computer science as empirical inquiry: symbols and search. Communications of the ACM, 19, 113-126.
38 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Summary
Spohrer, J & Maglio, P. P. (2009) Service Science: Toward a Smarter Planet. In Introduction to Service Engineering. Editors Karwowski & Salvendy. Wiley. Hoboken, NJ. .
Physical
Not-Physical
Rights No-Rights
2. Technology/EnvironmentalInfrastructure
4. SharedInformation
1. People/Individuals
3. Organizations/Institutions
1. Dynamically configure resources (4 I’s)
Model of competitor: Does it put us ahead?
Will we?StrategicSustainable Innovation
4.Competitor/Substitutes
Model of authority: Is it legal?
May we?RegulatedCompliance3.Authority
Model of self: Does it play to our strengths?
Can we?CostPlus
Productivity2.Provider
Model of customer: Do customers want it?
Should we?Value Based
Quality1.Customer
ReasoningQuestionsPricingMeasureImpacted
StakeholderPerspective
2. Value from stakeholder perspectives
S AP C
3. Reconfigure access rights
4. Ten types of outcomes (ISPAR)
5. Exploit information & technology
6. Physical-Symbol Systems
39 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Proposed Guidelines
Please send feedback to Wendy Murphy
Help us devise better ways to visualize scope of service science
For use with:– Students– Faculty– Practitioners– Policy-makers– Scientists & Engineers– Government officials
40 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Students for a Smarter Planet
YouTube - animated!!– http://www.youtube.com/watch?
v=P7bEyPrtFHM
and another– http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WklJujtIip4
Tweet comments to…– @wendywolfie
Continuously Improving Product-Service Systems = Smarter Systems
– Simplify the message
– Provide advanced organizers
41 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Service System Dynamics: Four Key Drivers of Change
Provider: Technology (Tech) & Sustainable Value-Cocreation Models– New technology to boost productivity & capacity (innovate)
– Use technology to perform routine manual, cognitive, and transactional work
– New relationship networks: Business models and new ventures (for-profit & non-profits)
Customer: Self Service– New self-service options to lower costs & expand choice (educate)
Authority: Rules– New rules to fix problems & achieve policy goals (regulate)
– Institutional diversity and governance of resource commons (Ostrom et. al.)
Competitors: Rankings– New rankings to guide decision-making & gain “valued” customers (differentiate)
– Hint: You want to be at the top of an independently ranked list of what customers are looking for…
– Especially for “valued” customers - calculating customer lifetime value (Rust et. al.)
42 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Example Service System Re-Design: A College Course
Problem: What if a college course had…– Input: Student quality lower
– Process: Faculty motivation lower
– Output: Industry fit lower
Solution: Tech + Self-Service– E: -20% E-learning enrollment
pre-certification
– F. +10% Faculty interest tuning
– J. +10% on-the-Job skills tuning
After a decade the course may look quite differentService systems are learning systems: productivity, quality, compliance, sustainable innovation
Maglio, P., Srinivasan, S., Kreulen, J.T., Spohrer, J. (2006), Service systems, service scientists, SSME, and innovation. Communications of the ACM, 49(7), 81-85.
Year 1: 20%
Year 2: 20%
Year 3: 20%
Year N: 20%
. . . . . . . .
E F J
43 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Data: Why education certification levels matter (to individuals)
…But it can be costly, American student loan debt is over $900M
44 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
42%6433 3 1.4Germany
37%261163 2.1Bangladesh
19%201070 1.6Nigeria
45%6728 5 2.2Japan
64%692110 2.4Russia
61%661420 3.0Brazil
34%391645 3.5Indonesia
23%7623 1 5.1U.S.
35%23176014.4India
142%29224925.7China
40yr ServiceGrowth
S%
G%
A %
Labor% WW
Nation
World’s Large Labor ForcesA = Agriculture, G = Goods, S = Service
20102010
CIA Handbook, International Labor OrganizationNote: Pakistan, Vietnam, and Mexico now larger LF than Germany
US shift to service jobs
(A) Agriculture:Value from harvesting nature
(G) Goods:Value from making products
(S) Service:Value from
IT augmented workers in smarter systemsthat create benefits for customers
and sustainably improve quality of life.
Data: Why the study of service systems matters (to nations)
45 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Data: Why the study of service systems matters (to businesses)
SOFTWARE
SYSTEMS(AND FINANCING)
SERVICES
2010 Pretax Income Mix Revenue Growth by Segment
Services
Software
Systems
44%
17%
39%
IBM Annual Reports
© 2011 IBM Corporation
IBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
StakeholderPriorities
Education
Research
Business
Government
StakeholderPriorities
Education
Research
Business
Government
Service Systems
Customer-provider interactions that enable value cocreation
Dynamic configurations of resources: people, technologies, organisations and information
Increasing scale, complexity and connectedness of service systems
B2B, B2C, C2C, B2G, G2C, G2G service networks
Service Systems
Customer-provider interactions that enable value cocreation
Dynamic configurations of resources: people, technologies, organisations and information
Increasing scale, complexity and connectedness of service systems
B2B, B2C, C2C, B2G, G2C, G2G service networks
Service Science
To discover the underlying principles of complex service systems
Systematically create, scale and improve systems
Foundations laid by existingdisciplines
Progress in academic studies and practical tools
Gaps in knowledge and skills
Service Science
To discover the underlying principles of complex service systems
Systematically create, scale and improve systems
Foundations laid by existingdisciplines
Progress in academic studies and practical tools
Gaps in knowledge and skills
Develop programmes & qualifications
Develop programmes & qualifications
Service Innovation
Growth in service GDP and jobs
Service quality & productivity
Environmental friendly & sustainable
Urbanisation &aging population
Globalisation & technology drivers
Opportunities for businesses, governments and individuals
Service Innovation
Growth in service GDP and jobs
Service quality & productivity
Environmental friendly & sustainable
Urbanisation &aging population
Globalisation & technology drivers
Opportunities for businesses, governments and individuals
Skills& Mindset
Skills& Mindset
Knowledge& Tools
Knowledge& Tools
Employment& Collaboration
Employment& Collaboration
Policies & Investment
Policies & Investment
Develop and improve service innovation roadmaps, leading to a doubling of investment in service education and research by 2015
Develop and improve service innovation roadmaps, leading to a doubling of investment in service education and research by 2015
Encourage an interdisciplinary approach
Encourage an interdisciplinary approach
The white paper offers a starting point to -
The white paper offers a starting point to -
The Birth of Service Science: A Framework for Progress(http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ssme/)
Source: Workshop and Global Survey of Service Research Leaders (IfM & IBM 2008)
Glossary of definitions, history and outlook of service research, global trends, and ongoing debate
1. Emerging demand 2. Define the domain 3. Vision and gaps 4. Bridge the gaps 5. Call for actions
© 2011 IBM Corporation
IBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
StakeholderPriorities
Education
Research
Business
Government
StakeholderPriorities
Education
Research
Business
Government
Service Systems
Customer-provider interactions that enable value cocreation
Dynamic configurations of resources: people, technologies, organisations and information
Increasing scale, complexity and connectedness of service systems
B2B, B2C, C2C, B2G, G2C, G2G service networks
Service Systems
Customer-provider interactions that enable value cocreation
Dynamic configurations of resources: people, technologies, organisations and information
Increasing scale, complexity and connectedness of service systems
B2B, B2C, C2C, B2G, G2C, G2G service networks
Service Science
To discover the underlying principles of complex service systems
Systematically create, scale and improve systems
Foundations laid by existingdisciplines
Progress in academic studies and practical tools
Gaps in knowledge and skills
Service Science
To discover the underlying principles of complex service systems
Systematically create, scale and improve systems
Foundations laid by existingdisciplines
Progress in academic studies and practical tools
Gaps in knowledge and skills
Develop programmes & qualifications
Develop programmes & qualifications
Service Innovation
Growth in service GDP and jobs
Service quality & productivity
Environmental friendly & sustainable
Urbanisation &aging population
Globalisation & technology drivers
Opportunities for businesses, governments and individuals
Service Innovation
Growth in service GDP and jobs
Service quality & productivity
Environmental friendly & sustainable
Urbanisation &aging population
Globalisation & technology drivers
Opportunities for businesses, governments and individuals
Skills& Mindset
Skills& Mindset
Knowledge& Tools
Knowledge& Tools
Employment& Collaboration
Employment& Collaboration
Policies & Investment
Policies & Investment
Develop and improve service innovation roadmaps, leading to a doubling of investment in service education and research by 2015
Develop and improve service innovation roadmaps, leading to a doubling of investment in service education and research by 2015
Encourage an interdisciplinary approach
Encourage an interdisciplinary approach
The white paper offers a starting point to -
The white paper offers a starting point to -
The Birth of Service Science: IBM Centennial Icon of Progress(http://www.ifm.eng.cam.ac.uk/ssme/)
Source: Workshop and Global Survey of Service Research Leaders (IfM & IBM 2008)
Glossary of definitions, history and outlook of service research, global trends, and ongoing debate
1. Emerging demand 2. Define the domain 3. Vision and gaps 4. Bridge the gaps 5. Call for actions
48 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
What about advanced manufacturing?http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nd5WGLWNllA
49 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Rethinking “Product-Service Systems”
F
B
ServiceSystem Entity
Product-Service-System
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
SSE
B
F
F F
B B
ServiceBusiness
ProductBusiness
Front-Stage Marketing/Customer Focus
Back-Stage Operations/Provider Focus
Ba
sed
on
Le
vitt
, T
(1
97
2)
Pro
du
ctio
n-li
ne
ap
pro
ach
to
se
rvic
e.
HB
R.
e.g., IBM
e.g., Citibank
“Eve
ryb
od
y is
in s
erv
ice
...
So
me
thin
g is
wro
ng
…
Th
e in
du
stria
l wo
rld h
as
cha
ng
ed
fa
ste
r th
an
ou
r ta
xon
om
ies.
”.
50 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Holistic Product-Service-Systems& Regional Innovation Ecosystems http://www.service-science.info/archives/1056
Examples: Nations, States, Cities, Universities, Luxury Hotels, Cruise Ships, Households
“Whole Service” Subsystems: Transportation, Water, Food, Energy, Communications, Buildings, Retail, Finance, Health, Education, Governance, etc.
Definition: A service system that can support its primary populations, independent of all external service systems, for some period of time, longer than a month if necessary, and in some cases, indefinitely
Balance independence with interdependence, without becoming overly dependent (outsourcing limits, maximum re-cycling for sustainability)
Nation
State/Province
City/Region
HospitalMedicalResearch
UniversityCollegesK-12
LuxuryResortHotels
Family(household)
Person(professional)
For-profits
Non-profits
Start-UpsNew Ventures
~25-50% of start-ups are newIT-enabled service offerings
SaaSPaaSIaaS
http://www.thesrii.org
51 © 2011 IBM CorporationIBM University Programs Worldwide (IBM UP)
Learning MoreAbout Service Systems…
Fitzsimmons & Fitzsimmons– Graduate Students– Schools of Engineering & Businesses
Teboul– Undergraduates– Schools of Business & Social Sciences– Busy execs (4 hour read)
Ricketts– Practitioners– Manufacturers In Transition
And 200 other books…– Zeithaml, Bitner, Gremler; Gronross, Chase, Jacobs,
Aquilano; Davis, Heineke; Heskett, Sasser, Schlesingher; Sampson; Lovelock, Wirtz, Chew; Alter; Baldwin, Clark; Beinhocker; Berry; Bryson, Daniels, Warf; Checkland, Holwell; Cooper,Edgett; Hopp, Spearman; Womack, Jones; Johnston; Heizer, Render; Milgrom, Roberts; Norman; Pine, Gilmore; Sterman; Weinberg; Woods, Degramo; Wooldridge; Wright; etc.
URL: http://www.cob.sjsu.edu/ssme/refmenu.asp
Reaching the Goal: How Managers Improve
a Services Business Using Goldratt’s
Theory of ConstraintsBy John Ricketts, IBM
Service Management:Operations, Strategy,
and Information Technology
By Fitzsimmons and Fitzsimmons, UTexas
Service Is Front Stage:Positioning services for
value advantageBy James Teboul, INSEAD