city of dallas: climate & energy initiatives - dallas cecap - alvarez.pdf · 2019-09-14 ·...
TRANSCRIPT
City of Dallas: Climate & Energy Initiatives
Susan Alvarez, PE, CFM
North Texas Renewable Energy GroupSeptember 14, 2019
2
3
USGS River Gage Locations
4
Lake Ray Roberts
Lake Lewisville
Lake Grapevine Elm Fork @ Carrollton
Elm Fork @348
West Fork @ Grand PrairieTrinity River @ Commerce
Trinity River below Dallas
5
• Principal Investigator: Dr. Arne Winguth/ UTA; 2015
• Performed trend analyses of historical and projected climate data for DFW Metropolitan Area
• Developed an Asset Inventory of existing and future transportation infrastructure in Dallas & Tarrant Counties (roads, passenger rail and aviation)
• Assessed vulnerability from “extreme temperature and precipitation” impacts to primary transportation systems
6
7
Fourth National Climate Assessment, Vol II — Impacts, Risks, and Adaptation in the United States
• Food, Energy, and Water Resources - Quality of life in the region will be compromised as increasing population, the migration of individuals from rural to urban locations, and a changing climate redistribute demand at the intersection of food consumption, energy production, and water resources.
• Infrastructure - The built environment is vulnerable to increasing temperature, extreme precipitation, and continued sea level rise, particularly as infrastructure ages and populations shift to urban centers.
• Ecosystems and Ecosystem Services - Terrestrial and aquatic ecosystems are being directly and indirectly altered by climate change.
• Human Health - Health threats, including heat illness and diseases transmitted through food, water, and insects, will increase as temperature rises.
Chapter 23 | Southern Great Plains
8
9
10
• United States Global Change Research Program. 2018. Strategic Finding #SF-2 of National Climate
Assessment No. 4, November, 2018;
11
12
Lack of National and State Action
• Federal executive branch favors coal and other fossil fuels over renewable energy
• The Governors’ November 2018 Rebuild Texas Report recommended eight measures to “future proof” the state, but did not address climate change or mitigation
13
• Cities consume 2/3 of the energy world wide
• Cities generate 70% of the world CO2 emissions
• Urban population is nine times larger today than 100 years ago and increasing
• Actions taken at the city level can have a major impact
• City leaders are more directly accountable to the public than state or federal officials.
23
Opportunities For Cities to Lead the Way
Climate change should not be a partisan issue. I disagree with any decision that undermines our nation’s leadership role in the fight to mitigate the effects of climate change. Dallas is a leader in emissions reduction efforts, and we have had significant success in reducing our carbon footprint. I am asking our staff to continue to develop and maintain programs that improve regional air quality, reduce carbon emissions and otherwise address climate change. This is a common-sense approach that is good for our citizens, our businesses and our planet.
Mayor Mike Rawlings on June 2, 2017
15
16
Texas Climate Planning
17
North Texas Climate Planning
18
19
Five Step Process
InInventory
of GHG Emissions
Establish Reduction
TargetsLeadership & Commitment
Develop Climate Plan
Implement Policies
Monitor & Verify Results
A Standard Protocol Is Required For Consistent Results
20
Any city that uses the ICLEI protocol can compare GHG emissions directly to other
cities
ICLEI offers the “Clear Path” online tool to assist with the inventory
The International Council for Local Environmental Initiatives (ICLEI) is one
commonly accepted protocol
Primary Scopes in Emissions Inventory
In-boundary waste and
wastewater
Agriculture, forestry, and
other land use
Stationary fuel
combustion
In-boundary transportation
Grid-supplied energy
Out-of-boundary waste and
wastewaterOther indirect
emissions
Out-of-boundary transportation
Transmission and distribution
21
Energy Efficiency Initiatives
22
• DFW Airport Energy retrofits – 1st US airport to achieve Carbon neutrality
• Love Field – Level 2 Carbon emissions reduction
• 468 Energy Star-related buildings
• EPA 2019 Excellence in Green Power Use Leadership Award
Emission Reduction Initiatives• Parks Department
piloting electric landscape equipment
• ½ light-duty fleet is alt fuel (~ 2,600 vehicles)
• LED Light replacements
• 468 Energy Star-related buildings
• Protection for Great Trinity Forest
23
Energy Generation Initiatives
• Cogeneration on WWTP Sludge Digestor - 50% power for 284 MGD capacity plant
• Landfill gas capture & sale
• Onsite solar - 7 buildings with 427 kW capacity
24
Kiest Park
New Green Energy Policy
25
• ~55.4 MW - 10 year contract with TXU/ $8M/year savings
• 100 percent RECs …...….for now• Implement ISO 50001, Energy
Management System+full energy audit
• Implement on- and off-site power generation towards 100% self-generation
• Encouraging Community Solar
Emission Inventory ResultsScope Sector Categories
Community Scale CO2e
(MT)
Government Scale CO2e
(MT)
Scope 1
Stationary Energy
Coal 95,888 Fuel Oil 359,529 Natural Gas 1,893,877 14,599 Natural Gas Fugitive Loss 514,008 3,962
Transportation On Road 6,779,889 58,639
WasteSolid Waste Generated 135,055 135,055 Wastewater Treatment 273 273 Closed Landfills 5,433 431
Industry Industry 645,115 Forestry Land use (382,452)
Scope I Total 10,300,296 212,960
Scope 2Stationary Energy
Electricity 9,678,871 450,622 Renewable Energy Credits (REC) (186,230)
Transportation Railway 69,738 <1Scope 2 Total 9,748,609 264,392
Scope 3Stationary Energy Electricity Transmission &
Distribution Losses 499,129
Transportation Aviation 70,252 Scope 3 Total 575,918
Total Emissions 20,364,604 477,352 26
Inventory Results – Total Emissions
All emissions measured in metric Tons of CO2 equivalent
27
City of Dallas Municipal Emissions
Buildings & Facilities Street Lights & Signals Vehicle Fleet
Water & Wastewater Solid Waste Other/Fugitive
Dallas Benchmark City
28
Dallas Municipal Emission Trends
1990 to 2017 ~68% Reduction in Emissions
29
1990 to 2015 40% Reduction in Emissions
Municipal vs. Community Contribution
Municipal Emissions (~2% of Total)
Community Emissions
30
North Texas Regional Emissions
Dallas Community Emissions
Transportation & Mobile Sources Commercial Energy Other Emissions
Industrial Energy Residential Energy
31
C40 City Comparison
Average 17,337,492
Median 10,118,774
Note: Dallas data is draft pending QA/QC
32
33
Next Steps
34
• Use GHG emissions inventory to develop Comprehensive Environmental & Climate Action Plan (CECAP)• Actionable steps and goals building
on the Resilient Dallas plan adopted by Council on August 8, 2018
• Use unified approach to environmental planning to better serve our community and strategic priorities
• Continue to encourage City emission reduction initiatives and conduct emissions monitoring
• Revisit GHG emissions inventory using 2020 data
35
Scope: Comprehensive Environmental & Climate Action Plan
Project Scope includes:• Compile & review City
plans/data • Benchmark best management
practices & identify Dallas options
• Develop internal/external City working groups
• Robust public outreach & engagement
• Perform modelling to assess effectiveness
• Develop & vet Dallas plan
36
CECAP Timeline
37
Approach to Public Engagement
38
City Environmental Planning Task Force• Transportation• Dallas Water Utilities
(Water, Wastewater, Drainage)
• Park & Recreation• Economic
Development• Aviation• Housing/Fair Housing
• Sustainable Development
• Planning + Urban Design
• Public Works• Fleet• Building Services• And others!
39
Stakeholder Advisory Committee
40
Dallas Environmental Justice Network
41Http://www.dallasclimateaction.com
42
43
44
ROUND 1 FEEDBACK - Community IdeasBuildings
• Require new construction to meet high energy efficiency standards
• Promote rebate programs to upgrade homes to ne more energy efficiency
• Convert street lights to LED lights
• Improve building and lighting efficiency
Energy
• Promote solar energy and renewables
• Implement stricter regulations
• Support tax incentives for energy efficiency
• Promote alternative financing or rebates for solar panels
45
ROUND 1 FEEDBACK - Community IdeasTransportation
• Safer walking & biking infrastructure• More frequent bus and train services• Employer sponsored DART passes• Improve public transportation• Alternative fuel vehicles• Improve active transportation
Solid Waste• Encourage businesses and offices
to reduce wastes• Implement Citywide organic waste
composting facility• Provide education on recycling
and composting• Ordinances & enforcement• Increase recycling options
financing or rebates for solar panels
• Promote solar energy and renewables
• Support tax incentives for energy efficiency
46
ROUND 1 FEEDBACK - Community IdeasWater Resources
• Promote growing plants and trees that require less water
• Use reclaimed/recycled water to water plants
• Use permeable paving materials to allow water to seep into the ground
• Reuse rainwater and grey water
• Education & Outreach
Adaptation
47
• Limit outdoor activities and time outside
• Stop or reduce watering my lawn to save water
• Stock up on emergency supplies
• Make structural (physical) adjustments
• Modify behavior
ROUND 1 FEEDBACK - Community IdeasUrban Ecosystems & Green Space
• Prioritize tree planting in urban heat islands
• Link trails between parks to connect communities
• Create new park place in communities that are park-deficient
• Improve safety & security• Improve access to parks &
trails
Food & Urban Agriculture• Encourage businesses with
extra food to donate to those in need
• Buy & promote locally grown produce
• Educate youth by creating kitchen gardens in schools
• Grow community gardens/urban farms
• Provide incentives for grocery stores
• Education & outreach
48
49
50
Disaster Management
Flood Protection
Infrastructure Upgrades
Clean Energy
Sustainable Transportation
Energy Efficiency
Urban Forest Management
Water Conservation
Water Quality
Local Food Production
Food Access
Food Recovery
ADAPTATION:Manage risks of climate change impacts
MITIGATION: Reduce emissions that cause climate change
ENVIRONMENT: Improve Quality of Life + Public Health
APPROACH TO PLANNING
51
52
53
54
55
56
57
58
59
60
61
62
63
64
65
QUESTIONS?