city region and the dominance of economic imaginaries
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
City Region and the Dominance of Economic
Imaginaries
BEMINE Final Seminar
Helsinki, 14 June 2019
Simin DavoudiDirector of
Global Urban Research Unit
![Page 2: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
The resurgence of ‘city region’
• Reincarnation of an analytical construct
• Justification for rescaling of governance
• But, what is a ‘city region’?
– Is it a spatial entity out there waiting to be
discovered?
2
![Page 3: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
3
• ‘The concept of the city-region, like all
concepts, is a mental construct.
• It is not, as some planners and scholars
seem to think, an area which can be
presented on a platter to suit their general
needs.’
Dickinson, 1964:227 emphasis added
![Page 4: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
Politics of scale
• How are city region imaginaries constructed
and institutionalised?
• What forms of knowledge and rationalities
are used to legitimize them?
• Why are certain imaginaries of city region
privileged over others?
•4
![Page 5: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
5
Outline
• The origin the city region concept
• The role of Functional Urban Region approach in
producing the imaginary of city region as an economic
space
• The interrelationship between FUR mapping and
neoliberal economic strategies
![Page 6: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
6
Burnham’s Chicago Plan, 1909
![Page 7: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
Patrick Geddes, 19157
![Page 8: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/8.jpg)
Fluid and contingent spatial relations
• ‘The metropolitan region … is primarily a
functional entity and geographically it extends
as far as the city exerts a dominant influence.’ McKenzie, 1933
• ‘The boundaries of the modern community, instead of
being precise lines, are blurred, if not indeterminate.’
Hawley, 1950:248
8
![Page 9: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/9.jpg)
• ‘There is no such thing as a single,
uniquely defined “region” that manifests a
full spectrum of city-regional relationships.’
Duncan, 1960:402
9
![Page 10: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/10.jpg)
• The fallacy of the
positivist view of the
city regional scale as a
fixed entity,
• neatly positioned
between the national
and the local scales.
10
![Page 11: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/11.jpg)
• City region scale doesn’t pre-exist our
interactions
• It is actively produced through political
strategies, institutional framing, analytical
practices, social relations and everyday lives.
• Scales are ‘perpetually redefined, contested
and restructured.’ Swyngedouw, 1997:141
11
![Page 12: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/12.jpg)
12
The dominant imaginary of city region
• Is that of an economic space
• It is constructed and legitimized by Functional
Urban Region analysis and maps
• Coined by Brian Berry in 1968, FURs are:
– seen as self-contained and coherent economic zone
– defined by mapping people’s daily travel to work
![Page 13: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/13.jpg)
13
Mapping and institutionalisation of
FURs in America: SMSA
• Marked a shift from population-based to
economic-based conception of metropolitan
areas (N.B. Gras, 1922)
• The US Census Bureau used FURs to define the
Standard Metropolitan Statistical Areas
![Page 14: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/14.jpg)
14
Britain’s Conurbations
• Conurbation was
morphologically defined as:
– ‘an area occupied by a
continuous series of
dwellings which are not
separated from each other by
rural land.’(C.B Fawcett, 1932:100)
• Adopted by the General
Register Office in 1956
![Page 15: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/15.jpg)
15
FUR in Switzerland: Stadtregion
• Hans Carol’s 1956
definition of
Zurich City region used:
– functional criteria
– Central Place theory
of a nested hierarchy
of services
![Page 16: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/16.jpg)
16
FURs in Britain: SMLA
Standard Metropolitan
Labour Areas
Hall et al., 1973
![Page 17: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/17.jpg)
17
Wider circulation of
FURs
![Page 18: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/18.jpg)
Dominance of FUR
• A deeply embedded imaginary of city regions
as economic spaces of employment flows
• Side lining alternative ways of imagining what
city regions are, and how they might be
defined as:
– biophysical spaces of ecological interactions
– cultural spaces of shared memories
– social spaces of experiences and encounters
– political spaces of struggle for justice and
citizens’ rights
18
![Page 19: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/19.jpg)
A core-periphery imaginary of Europe
19
Brunet’s ‘blue banana’, 1989ESDP’s ‘pentagon’, 1999
![Page 20: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/20.jpg)
20
Mapping the FURs
• A top-down, deductive
approach:
• Starts from a pre-determined
set of ‘core cities’
• Moves out to assign areas to
these on the basis of
commuting data
• Is used widely in in SMSA,
SMLA, ESPON
ODPM, 2006
![Page 21: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/21.jpg)
21
Components of the city-region
Inner core:
• Core
• Centre
• Node
• City
• Urban tract
• The ‘C Zone’
Outer surroundings:
• Hinterland (Gras, 1922)
• Umland (Schöller, 1957)
• Metropolitan community
(Bogue, 1949)
• Region (McKenzie, 1933;
Dickinson, 1947)
• Field of association /
Catchment area (Mumford, 1961)
• The ‘S Zone’ (Parr, 2005)
![Page 22: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/22.jpg)
22
The ‘core city’ in FURs
• A bounded space, defined by its morphological attributes of compactness and contiguous built-up area.
• Pre-selected on the basis of:
– Population size, economic performance (GDP), accessibility, etc.…
• The weight given to the selection criteria changes the total number of city-regions
![Page 23: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/23.jpg)
23
The ‘hinterland’ in FURs
• The extent of the FUR is measured by
either:
– Statistical analysis of actual work-related
commuting to the core, or
– Approximation of commuting time-distance
from the core
![Page 24: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/24.jpg)
Measuring the actual flows
• The extent of FUR is determined by:
– The inclusion of localities that have more than
certain share of their workers working in the
core city
• The lower the threshold, the larger the extent
of FUR and vice versa
24
![Page 25: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/25.jpg)
25
FURs constructed with a high threshold
• Many areas are
excluded from the
constructed FURs
• Despite their
environmental, cultural
or administrative ties
ODPM, 2006 (35% cut-off)
![Page 26: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/26.jpg)
26
FURs constructed wit a low threshold
• Many areas are included in the constructed FURs
• Despite their distinct historical, cultural and social identity
ODPM, 2006 (15% cut-off)
![Page 27: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/27.jpg)
27
York becomes the hinterland of Leeds!
Arrows, lines, and colours make certain things
visible, and remove others from sight.
![Page 28: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/28.jpg)
Maps are instruments of power
• Cartographical practices:
– not only describe where and what a city region is
– but also prescribe where and what it ought to be
• There is no objective representation of city
region.
• All representations are implicated in relations
of power.
28
![Page 29: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/29.jpg)
• ‘The struggle over geography is not only
about soldiers and cannons, but also about
ideas, forms, images and imaginings.’
Said, 1993:7
29
![Page 30: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/30.jpg)
‘Spatial Fix’
• ‘The inner contradictions of capitalism are expressed
through the restless formation and re-formation of
geographical landscapes’ Harvey, 1985:150
• ‘Capitalism cannot do without its spatial
fixes.’ Harvey, 2000:54
• Rescaling is part of the state spatial strategy
• Politically contested and influenced by dominant ideas
30
![Page 31: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/31.jpg)
Politics of rescaling
• FUR approach fixes the city regional scale in
such a way that is aligned with neoliberal
strategies:
– Obsession with economic efficiency and
competitiveness, and agglomeration economies of
larger cities
31
![Page 32: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/32.jpg)
The ‘ripple out’ assumption
• ‘Competitive cities create prosperous regions
through a potential chain reaction.’ ODPM, 2003:6
• ‘Trying to resist the agglomeration effects of big
cities is not just a waste: it is actively harmful to
Britain’s economy. Better to do the opposite and
encourage London and other successful cities to keep
growing.’The Economist,
32
![Page 33: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/33.jpg)
‘Liverpool's time is past’…
If we really want to give
people in Liverpool, …
opportunities, we need to
let many of them move to
the south-east.’
Tim Leunig, 16 October 2008,
Liverpool Cathedral
33
![Page 34: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/34.jpg)
• FUR approach is supported by and feeds into
neoliberal mentalities
• An example of power-knowledge dyad, where
power ‘both prescribes what is to be done and
codifies what is to be known.’
Davoudi, 2015:10
34
![Page 35: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/35.jpg)
FUR as an ‘article of faith’
• Rescaling decisions
making raises
questions about
political legitimacy
and democratic
accountability
35
www.CLG.gov.uk
![Page 36: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/36.jpg)
‘Geographies of discontent’
36Rodríguez-Pose, 14 July 2017, Cambridge
![Page 37: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/37.jpg)
Performative power spatial imaginaries
• Imaginative geographies
‘are profoundly
ideological landscapes
whose representations of
space are entangled with
relations of power.’
Gregory, 1995:474
37
![Page 38: City Region and the Dominance of Economic Imaginaries](https://reader033.vdocument.in/reader033/viewer/2022051717/6281517d7f2ae512a0702c87/html5/thumbnails/38.jpg)
• How we imagine the spatiality of city regions has
profound impacts on how they are governed, and
who decide their futures.
38