civ - de los angeles - ltd 1

7/28/2019 Civ - De Los Angeles - Ltd 1

1/12

0r{g'olt OchFrl)'(,qr/n|R\AiBrar ?rqc

Norrs oN LA}ID Trrr,g A}ID DEEDSTar,x or Dpax Enuanoo Ds Los Alqesr,ustThe Torrens System was conceived in Australj.a and adoPted .in thePhilippines. Its purPoses are: to make a. title indefeasible.irnorescriDt ible, and iNnune fron collatqral attacks.

TTAdvanLaqes of registration :// I. indefeasibiJ.ity after one year from entry of decree2. inprescriptible3. conclusive{. illllunity fror coll.tcral attackBur reqistration tsOa node of acquirtnq tltle

- Cabrra v. CA, 267 SCRA 339 lrhere one co-oHner does not. sign deed-.of sale, buyer cannot aPPly. fo! regl'stration ofentire lotModes of Acquisition of Property: possession, succession,donation, accretion, sale. and acquisitive prescription, i.e., 10 yearsin good faith and 30 years in bad faith.As a general rule, once Iand is registered under the Torrens System and;-Atificate of t.itJ.e is issued, it cannot be taken except if taken bythe DeparEment of Agrarian Reform,REGfSIRAETON - under PD 1529I{ho Can Reqister: (Sec. 14)

l. Those who by themselves or through their predecessors-in-interes thave been in open, continuous, excl.usive, and notoriouspossgssioq-and-eccuPation of. alienable anc disPosable }ands. .oftn"(g!f&-cggj, under a ucini fiae ciairn of ownarship si.nce June12, 1945 or earlier;- if land not ai.ienable as forest or park reservaEion. (Tit',i HotSprtngsl, land canndt b reglstered and. certiflcate of title is,ltur\ void (Palono v. !A, 255 SCRA 393].. ,.. , .,

\ddr!"r (s r. rno"._ .4'tu@&,y#"Y":*:Yo, @ o,*:. nrestripiion under the Provisions of existing Iawsir.0D ) 3. Those who have acquircd or{ncr.hin .'f nrlvate lands or abandonedrlvcr bcds by-rlght-.of {accetalon-or.


2/12

NOTES ON LAND TITLESby DEAN EDUARDO A. DE LOS ANGELES(Ta1k of EA. 14 July 1993)The Torrens SystemPhiLippines. ItsinprescripLible, andModes of AcquisiEion of ProperLy: possession, succession, donatj.on,accietion, sale, and acquisltive plescription. i.e.. 10 years i.n goodfaith and 30 years in bad faith.As a generaL rule. once land is registeled under the Torrens system anda celtificace of titte is issued. it cannoE be Eaken except if taken bythe Department of Aglarian Reform.REGISTRATION - under PD 1529who can Registerr (sec. 14)

1- Those who by themselves or tshrough their predecessors-in-intere$thave been in open- conl'inuous. excl-usive. aRd notori ora htAipossession and oc.upation of alienable and disposable Iands ofthe publi!--dogglin under a bona fide claim of ownership since June12--l-93!-s!sErue!,2. Those who have acquired ownership of private lands byprescri-ption under the provisions of existlng lawsi

was conceived in AustraLia and adopted in thepurposes are: to make a tit.Ie indefeasible.irnmune f rom colLateral attacks. I ondwitT--

of land in any other manner

3. ThoseriverIaws;4. Those who haveprovided for by

valid ti t1e -Possession, to ripenconuinuous since JunenaEerial and not casualA Eorest land is athe governmen! canlands. Mere palment.coupLed rrith possession

a forest I intotaxes is noE 5o, Ao,1 - 4dmi i.aL tLPrF )6s t4W

who have acquired ownership of private lands or abandonedbeds by right of accession or accretion under the existing

A corporat.ion cannot register pubfic land. They can only lease it.But a corporation can seek the registrati.on of a pri-vate land. EXCEPTif public land is held by an individuaL from June 12, 19{5 or earlj.er.ipso jure, the land becomes private.Note, however, that regisEratron only confirms title so the tiue mustbe valid. y.-tE.9. IE .Lanq ls reserved as t.ownsrte, rE canno! be acqu.r.recl even r-Iregistered already because a t.ownsit.e i-s outside the comnerce of man.therefore, VOID. Registratsion cannot validate a claim if Ehere is no

inEo ownership, must be open, actual, andL2, 1945 or earLier and must be physical and(e.9., going to the properEy once a year.)

non-regiscrable Iand. onlv Ehe executive brarich ofrtofI an owner.Not rcgithallc:

laktt , tovl lanlt}y,tkt I fotcthotv hndt ,

1 Milit471t Pabl;c Flazq

in Ehe concept ofienable t must


3/12

- accretion occurs rrhele (a) the deposiE is gradua.L/ andidpercePt ible, / (b) madc through effects of current oi water, and

1 fit{ergt{bo

it. Those lrho have acquired ownershlp of land l.n anyprovided for by Law. z'/ tr{'nJ'7lA corporallon cannot register tpublic land. They can onl.y Iease it./ But a corporation may acguire private land provided it is a philippinecorporation and at Least 60t of capital stock own by FiLipinos. Note:if public land is held by an individual from June 12, 1945 or earlier,ipso jure, the land becoroes private.Note

land ls resrved as te, Itregisterd already bccause a toxnsita ts outrlde thc c crcc of nan,therefore, VOID. Rglstration cannot vall.date a cl.iD if there is no ?g$ctfnopvcJ'lq f,IE.Le.

to

Possession, to ripen into oi{nershlp, nust be open,conlinuous since June 12, 19a5 or earlier and rnust bernaterial .and not casual (e.9., golng to the ploperty onceal coql 4 oactual, and..r,.J,4l.-,physlcal .ndr\ _i.lr"r+a .vear.l ''r)4

cF;.r,tr '.r/.

A Forest land is a lelrable land. Only the execuEive branch of r) tt{


4/12

'r.B.

Ocular inspection - improvements, Iots owners. adjacent owners.Then the court will prepare a report,Hearing/Trial - the applicant must prove three things:

a. proof of publication. (Jurisdictional matter,b. proof of ownershipc. proof of identity of landOppositors can introduce evidencerebuttal evidence.

9. Decision - three situations:to support opposition

a. court dccLds in favor of applicantb. courE dccldar la Lvor of opposltor/sc. court dls[lssas case because nobody proves outctship10. Court irsues order for a Decree.lt.Issuano of a Decre, ///l2.Registr of Deeds i.",r.r'Origirral Cu.tific . M.

RE},TEDIESFrotl an Order of Defautt

a- before decisLDn - flte a motion to llft order of default onthe grorrnd' of fraud, accident, ll.stakc and excusableneglLgence.b. after declsion - petition for rel.Lef ort the grounds offraud, acc!.dent, listate and negligence

Froo a Dcclriona. The losing party Eay file a notion for reconsiderttlon onthe ground that the decision is contrary to Larlevj.dence.It must be flled t{lthin 15 days froB beeeipt, otherwise, 'the declsl-on becomes fLna1.

1.

2.

b.

?


5/12

file a motion for a new t.rial. If the notion for a new triaL isdenied, the party nay still appeal.3. Fror a Pinal .rudgrent - decision becomes final after the lapse of15 days.

llhere a decree has not yet b.en ir"o"a, the Iosing party nay file apetition for relief under rule 38 of the Rules of Court on the groundsof fraud, accident, mistake and excusable negligence. It musL beverified anci filed 60 days fron notice but no more than 6 nonths fromentry of decision.- Failure to intentional omission of applicant to disclose theactua.L physical possession of property in application for Iandregistration, as a result of r,hich such person is not given notice ofproceedings, arcunts to actull fraud. (Ertrr.trll.c fraud uhcle itprfi.Irlf,s a party froo havlng a talal., (Roras v. C'l, 2?O SCRA 209r.

thc lostng party r.y rilc a ymryf pet Lt.Lort for revlew under Sec. 32. PD LS29 on th qround ol d.prl.vatlon il,-_'-i-i.thc loslng party r.y filc a \ "d;d^z ff::Hlr3i ;il'":: ll,i'.:.iT r,1'; ;'.,".?Jl'j[ [#*"1'. t:j#:"il r#&tni,+ust bg f[ed. utthlp I vegr frog tsqp?gsg ol ttlo-.9e.crec prolidgd theF'Jl'r{ttl lrL,1".'rY.11f"""",S"#y":lli - ffii.\ Prrce for the land'.F" li-i[i;"'l"le,?"'ff&"::"" f inl'i.i]ii::fi.E'".1",'#"1'"'"'.,J:i,r"i::" ?*,lryLQr't1pq.rights oyeE the propeity beiause of extrinsic fraud or breach of trust, \rttUc (lgYI ' provrded there is no rPv'.,lWqffiHIrT"9 . ,--,^^ i.a / l.lataib..-t - L- or breach of trust, h nay rccorc! thc landsisi' .b,, - -r 1. lrithin a yars r...- ari".""ty -Ll -i.""a 'rhers thre . ir 4'flrnl


6/12

If the perpetrator of fraud is insolvent cheacti,on for damages against the Assurance Fundthrrc ls no negligence and breach of trust.NOTE:z/ lnnocant purchaser for value/

Iosing party may file anwithin 5 years provided

(Islamic Directorate v. CA, 2'r2 SC&A 254)As a general rule, a final decislon with publlcation binds all partiesin rcr, thGrcfore, bind! th xholG rorld. PGrlooa (otryosltor! rndsquattGrsl c.n b. Gytctad./ouat.d by r r.aa xrlt of t o$Grrl,on fro!court. !l a pcrroD cntGrr batolra tha l'ru!!E! ot.thc dacrGc, thG orrnarcalr Gvlct th. pr'on tbru a rrrlt of posrcsslon. hJt lf a pcrron Gnt.r8aftcr thc lcsuance of th. dccrcc) tha ffitcr rt3t llla rn GJGctaantsult. ,.Certificate of TitleAn Orlglnal certificate of Tltle ls evidence of tltlc, that the land isreglstered under the Torrens Systen. It is lssued in two coples: oneoriginal which is Hith the Register of Deeds and one duplicate for theregistered owner.conflicting certificates - prior title prevails unless defectlve1. toeadnentg (ir.,.lot)

108 of PD L52e1,

- no notice of flaw or claim of other person odlzt fu f*V.r\ pays a full and fair price, ltt t* yrllt \- must examlne the seller' s ' dupllcate certificate of tit.Ler'

frd '.rolguln Bccrnas' to riroiquln

- reglstcrGd htcrGrt tarllnatcr or th6ra _l.a erro!inccrtl.fLertG ("b"l4l Ulrf t )- no serl.ous disputc as to error or change of status.'- does not aaount to reopenlng- does not itnpalr rights of innocent purchaseryBut if there Ls.a rubatantlal changc'' i.n the OCt 6r the change isdlsputed, the parcy must go thru the ordlnary reglstratlon proceedLng./E. q.

chans6 rron. :ididtrSiil}S 'jao.. u. dcsrdaa'suruarlly under Sec. i08. because thls ts - cannot bc 'ohanggda. rubstantlal . chtiEe. .

AEencbnts can be done sunoarily under Sec.

flle ah ordtiriry procbedLng.2.! typoiirphlcal crrog - ch.ng.SGrnas. -3. change froa iSed Cande,. narrled. to Ana santos' to 'Sed Cande.-'If idfe obrcts,. Scc." 1O8 ls not appltcable. :It nult go..thru e'' fulI-blown hbarlng.

[1


7/12

2. Reconstitutionff a duplicate OCa is lost, one nay file an action for replacement. Ifthe orlginal ocf is lost, one nay fll. for an ectl,on forreconstitution. If a title has been reconstitutad, rnyone deallng wlththe tltle must exercLse extlaoldlnary dlllgcncc. to bc dac!6d an IP.v.Petition must nocify occupant.s, adJacent orners and adverse clainantsby publication, p6sting and personal notices. Otherxl.se, reconstitutedtitle is void.where brother-in-Iaw pretends to be the registred owner of land, fLlesfor reconstitution, obtalns reconstituted certlflcate and nortgages toanother, mortgagee has no better right than [ortgagor esPecially uheletrua rcgistercd oHner stlll tras copy of hi!- fC! (lorret v. Ca, 185 SCRA16? I3. Doub]'e SatreA sale aftects thlrd persons only frou dat of registlatlon. OnderArt. 15{,a of the clvll Code, orncrcblp- pa.a8 to bqrr ln good falthvho flrst records the &lG 1n rcglltry of propGrty.Notlce of adverse clain is a Deasur designed to protect th interestof a person over a plece of land and serves as a warolng to third.persons dealing with sald property that soneone is claiming an interesttlrereon. (sajonas v. CA, 258 SCRA 79). But notlce must state hon andunder rlhom the atleged rLght of cLalloant acgulred. (Lozano v.Ballesteros, 1.95 SCP,A 681). Advrse cl.all[ effectlve once entered inday book even Lf 6wner'a dupllcato not surreDdred. (Galcla v. CA, 95scRA 380'

,st BsBQIrENf '.REGISiIRtrEIO}f tr.e., the -L.d is already tlrled andllou dcsl xlth ltt :Note: lhere is rgtstntion of voluntari talnlrctlona (stlc, rortgage,etc.l once deed entered in day book AND reglatrant turrendrs owncr'sdupllcate certifLcat6 and pays . fees

I .. lIoltqage'

-. leE$tratlon fcrJeri wfilur{ '[-rr{ fu uatkog

-r,r.tedf,4.trtchlk

b1


8/12

n".

bhcr is a ..lis pendcnr annqtated ac the rback.of. Ehq title., filino;.of an acrton may take rlnE. tC1^rl&^ti& Nk-e_)GEATN.OE TT.![I.E

Z registls Iand and gets TCt 12347Z.has a v.ll.d- tltleX returns and asks Y for tr.tlc and learns tlre salc of land to Z. x .caaaot recoyer fror Z biicluso ar, bot$aeD,.trro pcrronr, the ooa. rtro. c.ur.d tb. los! :nd rho l,r .doad ncAllgGnt rurC rutf.r. ffGrcdy of.X 1,, to ttl. an acEton ag.l,nst y for danag.r. But lf Z h.s not yGt ,.obtained tltlG, X can rccovGr fro[ z. -P-?-rle 12

.,( - owns ?CT 123,t5Y - hisrepresents to Z that he j.s X and sells the land to ZI-lI. z - lf z gers title, TcT 12347 ) Lirl.e is voID;. 2 is.ncgllgdntbscause he hbc thg-el$ty- ,Lo..Jlad ,oit thglz rh. scll.r ii ttrc'rcaiatircdor.D!r, thdref-ore, l$t-Xii iidcbvcr lue pr9f,6*y trq z. llso t! tic. prtcc

. ol 'tfta proPorty fr-trcplofoorly -loy. ,/t tcc.'-Lt-t^-. ob.Le{'G-tael. ,lnc.Y dld not gct rny'tltl. ln hlj n'ane, th.r.foro, 4 has no Litlc also.

x-III'Y- g-ok d

this ir an .iaeptton to the civil lau doctrl,nc that th6 strcal c.nnotbe. Ngbcr than th rourcc, l. e. , oven if d,he rcucr ha! no tltle,. thsbuyer can hava tl.tle. So forged document can be the root of a valldt1tle.The partles who forged the deed and sinulated the signatures of. otherpartles are Ln bad faith and the forged decd is a nulllty and cannotserve as a just title (Reyes v. CA, 258 SCRA 651)Eraqrl'e I 1. TIILE

VALIDe rA.";'.

VOI Dforgds X's sl,gnature in deed of saleof land ln Yrs favor, y gets tqf 123a6frou Regl.ster of Deeds(Y ls a forger, therefore, y has avoid tl.tle)- Y aells land to Z as IPV VAI,ID

reglstercd oPner of ?gt 123a5goes to OS, so glvcs tltlc tofrLcnd.-Yentrusted by X

T


9/12

E:qauple * 3Y for'ges the deed of sale but doGS not rGglster It to get a nevtittc. Y shbrrs to.Z. Z buys., Y ..tG! decd o! titlc la t.vor. of'z. Xcen iecorcr th6 propcrty. f!o! Z bGc.usa thrrc ts no chali ot tltl.. A!btr,e.n 2 prsonr. tha ottg xho should shoulder tha lqr! ,,! tb. on. rrho

ls ncgllg.nt. In thls .r.!plc. Z'i! ncgllgent. 'Not. th.t X ru.t hsy.a valld tltle in th fl,rst plac., othorHise, ttrer. can b NO chaln oftltlc. Note furthet that lf there is no 'chaln of tttl but land lsmortgaged, X can recover from Z but must respect the nortgage,, gaer-.ot}-brin- of -TitlsDuran .v. fACr38 SCRA a89Clrc! oHncd tro tots. ShG lcft for thG O.S. Latcr, a dccd ot salc i{asm& ln frvor ot Circr'! DothGr, phich dGGd lr.r rcglstcrcd. Clrcc'smth.r thcn Drtgagcd thc lgts. Bllen ClrcG lclrtlad abont thl.s, shewrota tba rcglrter of, dcedr thlt sha nevc! GxacutGd tha daad ol aalc toher [othcr, In the Eeantl.ne, th6 Boltgagee has toreclosed. t{henCl.rce'r -lother failed to redce!, thc lortgagae obtaln.d tltle ln ltsnane. Clrce claimed her slgnature ln the deed rras a forgeriHELD: Ilh.lle Article 2085 of the Civil Code requr.ros ounership by thenortgagor of the land to make the mortgaqe vaLid, lnsotar as thirdparties are concerned, circe's Dother was the reglsteled owner. It isa.general rul tbat there is no duty to look beyood thc cortlficate oftitl. The Dortgagee is in good falth. It acguLred tltle. Clrce didnot even intervene in the foreclosure sale. She was negligent.Tinio-Obsequio v. CA, 230 SCRA 550It h.s b.cn consl.stcntltT hcld. that a forgad .dcad c.tr lcgrUy bs theroot of a valld title whcn an lnnocent purchascr for yalu6 ,.nt!rvens.A'ded of sale execuEed by an lryostor vLthouE thc authority of theotrnar of Eh. land sold ir a nulllty, and regLstratloD rill noB valldatolrh.t -othcrt,lrc-ig. an.-lnvalt d docrncnt.

Survey of Recent Cas6s on Irand Iitle. and .Deedg

8/,


10/12

RegistraEion is not equivalnt of title. Under the Torrens $ystem,. registrati,oo only gives. v.Udlty to.tho trenrfcr or cratos a. llen upqnitri.iano. A haldcE ln .bad fatth. ba i iertlftcate df tlr.l;.ls noEentitlod- to' Elre protclion . of lar, for thcr lar. cannot - bo" used. .1s arltctd'for'fraud, (Ir v. l,tlnlpon, 38l.SCRA 788).,lny llan .nnotat.d on prcvious c.rtlflcatcs ot title rhould b.incorporated in or c.rricd ovcr to tb6 Dc crtl,flcate oJ tl,tle. Suchllen ls lnsepar.blG fron the propcrty as lt 1.3 a rlght Ln reB. ( PadconCondo Corp. v. ortLgas center, 382 scR.A 222). 'It reguires more than a party's bare allegation to dateaE the OCT whichon its 'face enjoys the Legal presumpti,on of regularliy of issuance.(Alvarico v. sola, 383 SCRA 2321.A privat. individual Day not brlng.n actLon for rcvGrsion (id.)tllstortcaUy, ' landt rclatrd^ by,{ovcarEot arG Dot.availabl for r.lGto priQtc p.rtlcs ur[l't. otb.r .li.nablG pubuc . Iands - ncl.ircdlerdr retaLn th.ir inhrrcnt potctrtlal ar .rG.t lor. prrblla urc.or lxrbl,'crcrelce (Chavez v. PEA, 38{ SCnA 152,,Juriaprudence holding that thG grant oC patent or lssuance otcertlficate ol tlt!,e the aLlenable lahd aC the-' publlc donatna_u-to.Eatically become3 privale land cannot apply to goverruoqnt units anCentities llke PEA. (Id. )Such Iands must. be transferred to guatilieA'., private.,- partie& or ..goverment-ut't)lt.ler not-tasked to dispose of public Iands befor .theseIands can becooe private or patrl-nonial lands.. (fd.lA buildinq in good falth is one l{ho builds with the bollefs that the.l.nd he ls bulldlng on ls hls, (Orguiol.a v. CA, 386 SC&A 30f).An .ction to gulet tltle nay be brought rrhen theE6 exlsts a ctoud ontbe tltle to real propEty or rny lntGrcst thcracm. (Gapacan v.CiFt, 387 SCRA 383).Orrce a .parcel,- ot..landa ls lneluded within a xaterahGd rarrvation duly_cstrblished by . Ercartlv ProclaDat,lon, . a-"FQrlrybtosr- arlscs- that thq,'.#eont{rrrr-to-baprrFoFruch-rer.rritdon -'Lnd 18:..t-r!Al*9.Ogblfi -,'uirirl'l:iclcErrEaird-corrl.nclng eyidedcs-of-subsequents-declbsslflcatlbn . 1sshot{n. (Cor.Iado v. CA, 390 SCRA 313).fhe rLght of leversion gr reconvayance .to.- the State.....,of . .pubUcpropertle3 ragLs.tered and whlch aie not.. capabtc of .pllvat' gpproplietion do6s not.praicrlbe lld.)-/IV Percoac dealing wltn pr6perty 'oov6!Gd by a hoireaa;.calij,tlcatc oftr.tle, ar. .buycrc or Dortgages, arc not.-regulrad- to -go bayond what.DIr.x8.{o )h. t ct-^t tba &ltlG. (O. Lon v. C.lalo, 391 SCRA 752).'llcre . adyeree;*poroeroion' for a p.'alrd--r '- I ! ! btn &.rl .. r.odld ..tuta.tlcally--.ntitil9- tha. po.r6!!oE to ' th6 rtghc-.e-'r.9ltE.a;pubtlc ,l.od^.il-tiq*raa9 .- ,llft1t hs h.s co. cr&rblfuh.*tre.d{cpoer}le.a.cC-rJJae.bl?charrctGa' of thG--larld by. a .po!{t}s.-.{c! .of . govBrnBent such a9 apr"sldentfal. proclanatlon,. executlve order; an . adrlnlgtratlvd .actLon,

,1


11/12

act or

Evcn. aft.r.. thc-. laprc. of on.. yar, ths . Statc ray brlng acdlon forreyersion Lf publlc lanC'has been fraudulent'ly granted. (Id.lt{heh a pafty. has aotual' knorl'dge ot .facts and cl'rcu!s!.nc63 that t'ouldlupel...a t"aionably .cautiou!.Ean to D.t lnqulryl rciylng -9n t!? fa9 of-the titlG-is-nots cnough. (ilaawan con. Rural Bank v. cA, 395 scRA {3)CancellaEion of titles. case cannot be ProPerly disDissed on the groundof torur shoPplng Prcdl.c.t.d on flllng and pcndlng of . dr[.g. c.sc.(UP v. sus!, 99? SCRA 365)/JA runcy of l.nd tubr.ct of an .PPllcadon for rGgl'rtr.tl'on is anerscati.l- rcqulrl,tc. (Dollno v. C'A, aol Sc&A 695!/,/e ""rt1fl.""t1on of tltlG cannot b. subJct of collateral attack.(Anlcete r,. Balanon, 102 SCRA 51{)

/O,rnership is not the sane at OcT. The latler ie only the evidenc oto$hershlp. (Erman v. Ernan, 103 scnA 1931An .a;tion is an. attack on a title when the obJect of the action l tonulllfy the titlc and thus challenge the judglDent or proceedingpursuant to xhtch the tltle xas decreed. The attack Ls dlrect when theollect oe an action ls to atrnul of set aside such judgnent or enjoin. Lts enforcedent. (Id. )A eorDt6r-cla{n can be considsred a dLr6ot attak qn th tltle. (Id.)\/thc oc-year peri,od docs. not atPly Hhao th. pcroon sccklng annulEnt oftltl,. or r.-eonyalfilnc. ls !,n posscrrion of tha lot. (Id.lAbscncG of opt ositton froE govertuent agencl'es ls of no mosent becausethc statG cannot -bc. oJtoPPd by th oolsston, dstalca, o! rror ot Ltsofflcf. als and agents'. (Rbpubllc ?. Lac, {o5 scRA 291)/eclassi fication of forest land and conversion inEo alienable Iandvrequirer an express and Positiv act from the goveinment. (Id.)

no'-iaria-ecc..can .1!ruo;rcol''''Yotd"lo! tnlstt en 'll!ee6n!.,,?u!dl!d'e'.fo8valuc has Lntervened.' (Id.l.

M/i


12/12

the free' that ..th. orlgtnr}': omqa .(t orlca, 'h.& tnorl.dg. of -.... 5ir!BdDi.itttarcd' .ortgagc.,itld iOt . corrrtlttrtc--Lctui}!"radtfcd. to..'thr 'rdcoDd..lDitg.gG. (@nz.tcs l, .b..oE-pr.o4.th.C-tho.l.tt !.h.4 actur!,lurorbdgcot--cuctr - unirghtcrd-. Drtgag.. fha.rubdeqocn!-r.tutdt.tton : .o! . Ils .pandcnt do.t not d.fr.t tlli...slgbtr of thc Drtg.g.G (conzalos, rhoreglstord hls 'Dortgad. rhcn tho notlcc of lls.'pcndcnc r.r not.yet.aDDotatd or the pulchaser at. the auction sale iho .derlvs hls llghts.fioN! th6 mortgagea.l{here clair of .possesrlon of land startcd . t^ .1962. such is not.sutflclent basis to apply fot registratlon of such land xhich under.PDt0?3 lnd L529 rhould h!v. st.rtGd ,lnc. Jun 12, l9l5 or .arllar.(llad.lr v. Clty ol C.bu, {11 SC&4.31.51lhc prlvetc partiGr arc procludod lr elelrl.og olacrhtp of tho lrndio dtsputc as thc ltsu. ot ouncrchlp by OP hrr log Daoa rttlcd .lnarDrous declsions of th Suprua Couat aDd bavc tlrcrefor. bcoucLncont.stable. (Paal v. CA, {15 SCRA {51)

l

civ - de los angeles - ltd 1

Documents