claims & dispute

Upload: sujani-maarasinghe

Post on 14-Apr-2018

218 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    1/43

    Construction Claims And Dispute

    Resolutionby

    Upali Fernando

    MRICS, MCIOB, MAcostE, ACIArb, MASI, AIQS(SL)

    (Chartered Quantity Surveyor, Cost Consultant, Independent Adjudicator

    and Charted Builder)

    Managing Consultant

    WANFERND CONSULTING

    Construction Consultant Specialized in Quantity Surveying, Project

    Management and Claims and Contract Administration

    http://www.wanferndconsulting.com

    [email protected]

    http://www.wanferndconsulting.com/http://www.wanferndconsulting.com/
  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    2/43

    CLAIMS ARISING OUT OF THE CONTRACT

    These claims arises due to the breach ofexpressed and/or implied terms of the

    contract. Such claims may relate to any or

    all of the following; Claims related to extension of Time for

    Completion

    Fluctuation Claims

    Variation Claims

    Loss and Profit Claims

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    3/43

    CLAIMS RELATED TO EXTENSION OF TIME

    FOR COMPLETION

    Any properly drafted contract would entail two

    provisions ; a definite beginning ( Commencement

    Date ), and; a definite end ( Completion Date).

    To enforce the completion date the Contract provides aprovision to the Employer to deduct a pre-determined

    sum ( generally per day ) from the Contractors

    entitlement ( payment ) if the Contractor fails to

    complete the works by the Completion Date. This

    charge is called Liquidated Damages(LD).

    However, this Liquidated Damages can only be

    applied for the delays where the Contractor is solely at

    fault.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    4/43

    CLAIMS RELATED TO EXTENSION OF

    TIME FOR COMPLETION ( Contd. )

    But the completion of works may also get delayed due

    to employer faults as well.

    In a situation where the employer cause delay to the

    completion of the work, then the agreed contractualcompletion date will no longer become valid/binding

    upon the Contractor; hence time becomes at large.

    When time becomes at large, the Contractor will only be

    obliged to complete the Contract within a reasonabletime and more importantly the liquidated damages

    clause will fall away.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    5/43

    If the liquidated damages falls away the Employer would

    not have any provision to penalize the Contractor for his

    subsequent defaults.

    Therefore the purpose of granting extension(s) oftime ( EOT) is to allow the date or period for

    completion to be adjusted in circumstance where

    the Employer has caused a delay.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    6/43

    THE CONTRACTORS BENEFIT FOR

    SUBMITTING CLAIMS FOR EOT

    To protect themselves against any potential

    Liquidated Damages,

    To recover the costs of Site Overheads

    (Preliminaries ) and Head Office Charges for

    the period extended from the original

    Completion Date.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    7/43

    Contractual Provisions to produce an

    EOT claim

    When claiming for EOT the Contractor has to

    establish the following;

    that the Contractor is not responsible for the

    subject delay, and;

    that the reasons for the delay are the ones hold

    the Employer liable under the provisions of the

    Contract; these delays are known as excusabledelays.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    8/43

    DELAY AND ASSESSMENT OF DELAYS

    Delays contributed by the Engineer/theEmployer may impact the project in two ways;

    Delay to the progress of workssuch delays areoccurring merely on a single activity ; these delaysmay not necessary affects the completion date of theproject.

    Delay to Completion Datesome delay to theprogress will also result in a delay to the completionof the project.Importantly and often most difficult task therefore

    is to identify which delays to progress cause a

    delay to the completion and determine it extent.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    9/43

    KEY ELEMENTS IN PREPARATION OF

    AN EOT CLAIM

    The role of the programme

    The programme or more specifically base-line

    programme is an essential tool for planning ,

    managing of the control of a project. Programmegenerally provides the Contractors intention to go

    about with his task of executing works.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    10/43

    Following are the main objectives of a base-line

    programme;

    a) Determine the earliest date upon which the

    completion can be achieved

    b) What are the critical activities ( critical path ) in order

    to achieve the completion date on time

    c) Demonstrate the interrelationship/interdependancy

    among activities

    d) Presenting a logical sequence to the site operations.

    e) Identify the time constraint imposed by labour, plant

    and materials.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    11/43

    KEY ELEMENTS IN PREPARATION OF AN

    EOT CLAIM (Contd.)

    The role of the programme for presenting EOT claims

    Base-line programme act as a yardstick when it comes to

    establishing the effect of a disruption on the progress of works

    thereupon the completion date.

    How you demonstrate a delay in a programme ?

    Step1- use the base-line programme and update it just before

    the delay occurs. This will gives the reader an indication that if

    the subject Employers delay had not occurred the project would

    be finish by certain date.

    Step 2- then you insert/include the Employers delay as an

    activity and show what has happened to the completion date due

    to the Employers delay.

    Step 3-Maintain all records (contemporary records) to

    substantiate the above both steps

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    12/43

    The difference of Completion Dates ; i.e. CompletionDate without the Employer delay ( step 1 ) and the with

    Employers delay (step 2) is the Contractors entitlement

    for EOT.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    13/43

    PROCEDURE TO CREATE AN EOT

    CLAIMS

    The Conditions of the Contract ( COC ) will states theprocedural requirement that the Contractor need to

    fulfill to submit a EOT claim.

    Step 1- If the Contractor believes that any potential

    delay have occurred due to the Engineer orEmployers fault, he is required to promptly notify (

    see the COC to know the time frame ) of his intention

    to claim for extension of Time for Completion and

    receive additional costs in that regard. Step 2- Following the notice , the Contractor is

    required to provide particulars with proper

    substantiation by using the Programme (programme

    may be based on software such as Microsoft or more

    advance Primavera )and any other evidence to prove

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    14/43

    The Engineer may determine/quantify the extent of

    extension of time which the Contractor is entitled to.However keep in mind that the when assessing your

    entitlement , the Engineer will assess delay contributed

    by you to the completion of the project. So while

    claiming for your entitlements make sure to keep your

    house in order always.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    15/43

    Claiming for additional cost associated with

    EOT claims

    Due to the delay to the progress of works, the

    Contractor may incur two types of additional costs;

    Extended preliminaries Extended Head Office costs

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    16/43

    HOW TO EVALUATE EXTENDED

    PRELIMNARIES

    This can be derived by arriving the total actual cost of time related items inthe Preliminaries and dividing by the Contract Duration and multiply by the

    number of dates extended.

    Example

    i) The amount of time related preliminaries including Overheads = Rs. 3,000,000.00

    & Profits.

    ii)The amount oftime related preliminaries excluding Overheads

    and Profits (Assumed 20% as the Overheads & Profits) = Rs.3,000,000.00 x 100

    120

    =Rs.2,500,000.00

    ii) Contract Duration say 400 calendar datesHence day rate is =Rs.2,500,000.00

    400

    = Rs 6250.00

    iii) Number of Days extended say 20 = Rs.6250.00 X 20 days

    iv) Then the Amount of extended Preliminaries = Rs.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    17/43

    Some time this preliminary based method may not be

    accepted by the Engineer. In such events the

    Contractor has to substantiated with actual cost

    incurred within this extended period.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    18/43

    HOW TO EVALUATE EXTENDED HEAD

    OFFICE COSTS

    It is very difficult to find out exact additional costs to

    the head office due to the extended period of a

    single project.

    Accordingly various formulas being used to calculate

    , if the Engineer is willing to accept , head officecosts. Such formulas are;

    Hudson Formula

    Emden Formula

    Eichleay Formula

    Hank Laan Formula

    Modified Eichleay Formula

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    19/43

    Emstorm Formula

    Manashl Formula

    Cartert Formula

    Allegheny Formula Samaratunga Formula

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    20/43

    EXAMPLE HUDSON FORMULA

    If the Initial Contract Price is a

    If the Overhead percentage is b(b/100)

    If the original Contract Duration is c

    Then the Amount of Day Rate is a x b =y

    c

    Hence the extended dates say z

    Then the amount of extended head office costs is y x z

    Total E.O.T claim = extended preliminaries + extendedhead office cost

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    21/43

    PRESENTATION AND NEGOTIATION

    He who asserts must prove ; the burden of proof rest with theperson who is claiming ( i.e. the Contractor ).

    Following are the most important aspects when making an

    extension of Time Claim;

    Be mind fu l of the provis io ns of the contract ;theseprovision will first and foremost determine your entitlement,

    so comply with them.

    Remember what yo u need to establ ish;do not bring

    irrelevant point to your claim. Stick to what you are claiming.

    Commun icate effect ively ;the reader of your claim should

    not struggle to understand what you are saying. Use clear

    language and shorter sentences

    Summaries clearly

    Support w hat you state with evidence

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    22/43

    DISPUTE RESOLUTION

    Introduction

    From time to time quantity surveyors find

    themselves involved in contractual disputes

    either in litigation in the courts, in arbitration or inalternative dispute resolution cases (ADR)

    cases.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    23/43

    Litigation

    Arbitration

    Adjudication

    Mini-trial* Mediation

    * Conciliation

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    24/43

    WHY DISPUTE ARISE

    Adversarial nature of construction contracts Poor communication between the parties

    concerned

    Proliferation of forms of contract and warranties

    Fragmentation in the industry

    Tendering policies and procedures.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    25/43

    LITIGATION

    Litigation is a dispute procedure whichtakes place in the courts. It involves third

    parties who are trained in the law, usually

    solicitors and barristers, and a judge who isappointed by the courts. This method of

    solving disputes is often expensive and can

    be a very lengthy process before the matteris finally resolved, sometimes taking years

    to arrive at a decision.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    26/43

    ARBITRATION

    Disputes between parties to a contract are

    traditionally heard in the courts, but in

    building contracts the chosen method has

    more often been arbitration. Arbitration toresolve disputes in building contracts comes

    about following the agreement of the parties,

    either when the dispute arises, or more often

    as a term of the original contract.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    27/43

    The traditional advantages of arbitration over

    the courts are four-fold:

    Arbitration proceedings are quicker than the

    courts

    Arbitration is cheaper than litigating in the

    courts

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    28/43

    The parties get a judge of their choosing,a person knowledgeable about the subject

    matter in dispute, but with no knowledge of

    the actual case, rather than a judge

    imposed on them

    Unlike proceedings in the courts,

    arbitration proceedings are confidential

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    29/43

    MINITRIAL

    The minitrial is an alternative disputeresolution (ADR) procedure that is used by

    businesses and the federal government to

    resolve legal issues without incurring theexpense and delay associated with court

    litigation.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    30/43

    The mini-trial does not result in a formal

    adjudication but is a vehicle for theparties to arrive at a solution through a

    structured settlement process.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    31/43

    Advantages of Mini Trial

    1. Mini-trial is more structured than

    mediation

    2. In this method strengths and

    weaknesses of the parties are assessed

    by the independent facilitator. 3.There is agreat saving of time and money when

    compared to litigation.

    4. This method is not a trial at all andmaintains confidentiality.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    32/43

    5. The business relationships ismaintained

    6. Hostility is reduced.

    7.Neutral advises assists managementin resolving dispute.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    33/43

    Disadvantages of Mini Trial

    1. If this method fails then it is lateradmissible in court for resolution.

    2. This method will not succeed if the

    parties have any doubt on his impartialityand independence

    3. This method provides the parties a

    freedom to withdraw from this method at

    any point of time.

    4. This system is not cost effective.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    34/43

    MEDIATION

    This is an Alternate Dispute Resolution inwhich an independent third party

    (mediator) assists the parties involved in a

    dispute or negotiation to achieve a

    mutually acceptable resolution of the

    points of conflict .The mediator who may

    be a lawyer or a specially trained non-

    lawyer ,has no decision-making powersand cannot force the parties to accept a

    settlement.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    35/43

    Mediation is widely used in all sorts of

    disputes, ranging from divorces to civil

    lawsuits to very complex public policy

    problems to international conflicts. Manydisputes that have not responded to an

    initial attempt at negotiation can still be

    settled through mediation.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    36/43

    Mediation is of particular importance inlong-running, deep-rooted conflicts, as

    this type of conflict is rarely resolved

    without such outside assistance. Even ifthe full range of grievances cannot be

    resolved, mediation is often useful for

    dealing with particular limited aspects of

    the wider conflict

    One of the main advantages of mediation

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    37/43

    One of the main advantages of mediationis that it is often less costly than filing a

    lawsuit and taking that case to court before

    a judge or a full jury. When the mediatorwas able to enhance the problem-solving

    skills of both parties and help them steer

    clear of further disputes or clashes ofopinions and of whims, then that mediator

    is quite good. Many of those who have

    gone through and settled disagreements

    via mediation usually end up feeling much

    better and lighter than when they came out

    of an acrimonious court fight, even if they

    won that case.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    38/43

    One more disadvantage of mediation is

    when one party is very passive and likely

    to be bombarded by the other side. Theymay come up with an agreement yet it

    may be lopsided to favour the more

    prominent faction. Other manifestations ofa great mediator in this scenario are when

    he/she ensures that both party's needs are

    equally articulated and safeguarded, and

    when he/she would cease to continue with

    the mediation if one faction would unjustly

    take advantage of the other.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    39/43

    Conciliation

    Conciliation is an alternative dispute

    resolution process whereby the parties toa dispute (including future interest

    disputes) agree to utilize the services of a

    conciliator, who then meets with theparties separately in an attempt to resolve

    their differences. He does this by lowering

    tensions, improving communications,interpreting issues, providing technical

    assistance, exploring potential solutions

    and bringing about a negotiated

    settlement.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolutionhttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alternative_dispute_resolution
  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    40/43

    Procedure of peaceful settlement of

    international disputes . The matter of

    dispute is referred to a standing or ad-hoc

    commission of conciliation ,appointed with

    the parties agreement. The eventualreport is expected to contain concrete

    proposal for a settlement , which ,

    however , the parties are under no legalobligation to accept.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    41/43

    Advantages

    - Both parties should compromisebecause of the great respect of the

    neutral person.

    - Faster than negotiation

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    42/43

    Their Disadvantages are as follows:

    - Higher cost than negotiation because ofthe expense for the third person.

    - Less confidential. Because it involved

    with the third person.- There are not binding the parties and

    third person as same as in negotiation

    unless enforcing by the Courts order.

  • 7/27/2019 Claims & Dispute

    43/43