class 17 - oct.21 case study

17
Global Marketing Management Case Study: Nestlé MKGT 3215-001 Fall 2010 Mrs. Tamara L. Cohen Thursday Oct.26, 2010

Upload: saba-arif

Post on 04-Apr-2015

194 views

Category:

Documents


0 download

TRANSCRIPT

Page 1: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

Global Marketing Management

Case Study:Nestlé

MKGT 3215-001Fall 2010

Mrs. Tamara L. Cohen

ThursdayOct.26, 2010

Page 2: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

Exam # 2 Oct. 26Exam #2 will follow much the same format as Exam #1:• Multiple choice questions; Fill-in-the-blank questions; Short answers. • Material from classes 11, 12, 13 (guest, Family Dollar), 14, 15, 16, &

Nestlé case (class 17)

Suggestions for effective preparation (in order of importance):1. Study PPTs from each class. All PPTs are on my web site. Pay attention

to the notes below the slides. (Most but not all slides have notes below.)

2. Study your own notes from class. Pay attention to any topics we dwelt on in class. Review 1-2 major points mentioned in elevator speeches.

3. Review your homework assignments.4. You may be required to figure out an answer using a concept we’ve

learned e.g. “cultural borrowing” in 1st test5. There may be references to subjects mentioned in elevator speeches.6. Read assigned passages from text book.

Page 3: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

Nestlé

Preparation for this class: • Read Cateora & Graham

Nestlé Infant Formula ControversyCase 1-2, pp 598 - 601 (14th ed.)

• Visit Nestlé web site www.nestle.com

? ?

Page 4: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

BOTTLE or

BREAST ?

Page 5: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

BACKGROUND• 1974 pamphlet “Nestlé Kills Babies”

Arbeitsgruppe Dritte Welt allegation: – False advertising in LDCs encouraged mothers to use infant formula

instead of breast-feeding, causing deaths and malnutrition.

– Nestlé accused of unethical & immoral conduct.

• Infant formula misused in LDCs

• Worldwide boycott of Nestlé > 20 years• 1913 Nestlé started promoting

breastfeeding as best (educational booklet)

• 1982 Nestlé supports WHO code re marketing infant formula to mothers in LDCs

• AIDS/HIV contracted through breast milk

Page 7: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

PROBLEMS

1. Marketing and false advertising of infant formula in LDCs allegedly led to misuse and consequent death and malnutrition.

2. Consumers in LDCs often poor & illiterate. Language problems.

3. Economically deprived mothers also nutritionally deprived. Quality and quantity of their breast milk inferior.

4. Lack of nutrition education + poor sanitation + affordable good food in LDCs.

5. Poor women’s work schedules often don’t permit breast-feeding.

6. Native weaning foods’ nutritional value low & contaminated at all stages of preparation.

7. Nestlé defense that never advocated bottle over breast, evidence statement on packaging.

8. Nestlé accused of dumping.9. Doctors in LDCs liberally gave out

samples of formula.

Page 8: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

more PROBLEMS10. Nestlé accused of systematic WHO

code violation.11. Worldwide boycott of Nestlé

products & controversy continued for > 20 years.

12. Boycott groups well organized, use modern political pressure, strong media coverage.

13. The longer the controversy continues, the more costly the settlement.

14. Infant formula use has been successful in some LDCs but not in others.

15. Other companies sold formula in LDCs too. (Is Nestlé an appealing target because it’s so big?)

16. What responsibility does Nestlé have to a culture it has changed?

15. HIV / AIDS

Page 9: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

                                                                      

Page 10: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

COURSES of ACTION1. High cost of marketing + training

= price of social responsibility2. Continue no mass media

advertising. Use only sales rep’s.3. Control/monitor distributors’

promotional activities (previous free rein over local advertising).

4. Nestlé headquarters should closely coordinate & monitor all external PR programs.

5. Continue advertising campaign targeting poor women who receive free formula from gov’t. This program promotes breast-feeding to under-educated audience. Publicize this!

6. Further comprehensive nutrition + hygiene education programs, especially in rural areas.

7. Clarify labeling on all infant products: Use graphic instructions for areas of low literacy.

8. Develop promotional/instructional materials to help low literacy users.

9. Dumping: Tighten up hospital administrations’ broad interpretation of “in need” to rein in providing low cost and free formula on request.

10. Nestlé stop all free and low cost giveaways in LDCs, except for limited number of infants in need. Help get other companies to stop.

11. Address accusations of WHO code violations. Use PR to publicize actions and defuse opposition. Deny free samples to doctors supporting substitution. Nestlé field policy includes articles of WHO code.

Page 11: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

more COURSES of ACTION12. Tighten up direct selling methods.

Common practice was to use mother-craft nurses (nurses/ dieticians/midwives), dubious qualifications to advise re breast- vs bottle-feeding.

13. Recognize successful infant formula use in LDCs where use controlled by educated missionaries and responsible gov’t agencies. Limit distribution strictly to these sorts of medical and religious groups.

14. Initiate personal relationships with main perpetrators of boycotts. Defuse boycotts.

15. Improve planning and monitoring of cross-cultural aspects of product introductions and community activities.

16.Determine appropriate policy re best practices for mothers with AIDS/HIV. Breast-feeding or bottle-feeding best? Nestlé should cooperate with govt’s in each country separately to determine best approach to handling AIDS/infant formula problem. LOCALIZATION is key.

Page 12: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study
Page 13: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

RECOMMENDATIONS

• Maintain commitment to serve LDC markets despite criticism.

• Continue activities and policies in support of responsible marketing in LDCs. Use proactive and constructive PR to advocate for Nestlé image.

• Prioritize comprehensive nutrition + hygiene education programs, especially in rural areas.

• Contribute responsibly to battle against spread of AIDS/HIV in LDCs.

Page 14: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

CONCLUSION

Nestlé is a major global marketing company with dominant brands and a record of impressive aggressive growth.

The company has battled negative publicity and boycotts for almost 25 years. Corporate responsibility is not only what is defined by the industry but also what is perceived by consumers.

Nestlé has distinctive competencies in producing high quality foods. The right strategy is to expand geographically. Emerging markets present great opportunity. Nestlé should maintain and extend its considerable endeavors to bring its infant formula to developing countries’ markets responsibly. The company should focus its public relations efforts on the company’s multiple positive initiatives in developing countries all over the world.

Page 15: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY

Nestlé Alimentana is the biggest food company in the world. The company has taken a battering over the issue of infant malnutrition and death in developing countries, due to alleged irresponsible marketing and improper use of its infant formula.

Nestlé’s stated mission is to be the world's leading nutrition health and wellness company based on sound human values and principles. This company has the vision and the resources to remain committed to serving challenging markets in developing countries, while combating negative image through its own proactive public relations campaign.

Page 16: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

Next class: Exam # 2

Preparation: Review PPTs & your class notes Review assigned readings

Page 17: Class 17 - Oct.21 Case Study

Sample exam question: