classicism and civility
TRANSCRIPT
![Page 1: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/1.jpg)
Irish Arts Review
Classicism and CivilityAuthor(s): Julian WaltonSource: Irish Arts Review (2002-), Vol. 21, No. 1 (Spring, 2004), pp. 102-107Published by: Irish Arts ReviewStable URL: http://www.jstor.org/stable/25503014 .
Accessed: 14/06/2014 13:37
Your use of the JSTOR archive indicates your acceptance of the Terms & Conditions of Use, available at .http://www.jstor.org/page/info/about/policies/terms.jsp
.JSTOR is a not-for-profit service that helps scholars, researchers, and students discover, use, and build upon a wide range ofcontent in a trusted digital archive. We use information technology and tools to increase productivity and facilitate new formsof scholarship. For more information about JSTOR, please contact [email protected].
.
Irish Arts Review is collaborating with JSTOR to digitize, preserve and extend access to Irish Arts Review(2002-).
http://www.jstor.org
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 2: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/2.jpg)
.<fcr ?N
W^ &?A
CLASSICISM
AND
CIVILITY
Early in the year 1746 Waterford received a new Church
of Ireland bishop, Richard Chenevix. The episcopal residence at that time was a large plain building next to
the imposing if dilapidated medieval cathedral. From
the cathedral close he could look down on the tree-lined Mall
recently created by the draining of a marshy inlet of the River
Suir. His view was dominated by the shell of the huge new epis
copal palace begun by his ambitious predecessor Charles Este to
the design of Richard Castle and left unfinished since the
bishop's death the previous year. Its completion would obviously
be an early priority for Chenevix, and he looked around for the
most suitable person for the job. Waterford at the time had a
small but influential Huguenot community, and Chenevix being
himself of Huguenot stock (his father had fallen at Blenheim) was
acquainted with a crusty Huguenot veteran, Major Francis
Sautelle, whose daughter had married a Waterford-born architect
named John Roberts. The couple were now living in Patrick
Street in somewhat precarious circumstances with their ever
increasing brood of children. Thanks to the Huguenot connec
tion, Roberts received the commission to complete the palace.
The superb siting of the palace and its vast size - even today it
dominates the Mall - emphasise the dominant position of the
Church of Ireland in the mid-18th century (Fig 13). Architecturally it bears very much the stamp of Castle
- the Doric centerpiece and
circular niche above it on the Mall front, for instance - but its suc
cessful completion marked Roberts out as an architect of consider
able ability. The interior is greatly altered today, for in the 1920s a
successor of Chenevix's moved to a more modest country resi
dence and the building then became the headquarters of Bishop
Foy's School. Today, greatly restored, it forms part of the civic
offices. So pleased was Chenevix with his new palace that he leased
his former residence to John Roberts on very favourable terms.
This promising start, and the Bishop's recommendation,
launched Roberts on a uniquely successful career. In 1753 we
find him being commissioned by the Surveyor General, Thomas
Eyre, to work on the new barracks in Waterford.1 And at about
the same time he was employed at Curraghmore, Co. Waterford,
the seat of the Earl and Countess of Tyrone, where he designed
The refined public buildings created by John
Roberts (1714-1796) did much to project an
?mage of Waterford as a city of consequence
in the 18th century, writes JULIAN WALTON
10 2 I
IRISH ARTS REVIEW SPRING 2004
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 3: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/3.jpg)
ARCHITECTURE 1 CLASSICISM AND CIVILITY
and built the huge courtyard that forms such a dramatic approach
to the house. It is an extraordinary creation, more reminiscent of
the style of a French ch?teau than of the residence of an Irish
peer. Roberts's model must surely have been Vanbrugh's
Blenheim Palace, and indeed the Curraghmore courtyard is
almost as large at 550 feet long and 192 feet wide; it consists of
The startling project of demolishing a fine medieval cathedral, and its replacement by a new building in a completely different
style, indicates the self-confidence of Waterford's civic oligarchy matching ranges facing each other of two storeys and thirty-one
bays. The centerpieces of each range have sandstone ashlar coach
houses of five bays with large central arches (Fig 10). The archi
tectural features owe much to the influence of James Gibbs,
whom Roberts had no doubt studied carefully in London.
In the following decade Roberts was commissioned by Charles
Huson, rector of St Iberius's Church in Wexford, to rebuild the
church there.2 It is designed in the form of a galleried rectangle
with an apse in the middle of one of the long sides containing the
altar, and screened by a triple arcade carried on great Corinthian
columns. This seems to have been Roberts's first essay in church
building, and its success influenced the style of his first major
ecclesiastical work, the rebuilding of Water ford Cathedral.
The condition of the cathedral had long been a cause for con
cern. In 1739 Bishop Milles had commissioned William
Halfpenny of Bristol to submit plans for its complete rebuilding,
but before these could be taken further the Bishop died. In 1773
^^^^^^^^^^^^BHl^HF^if^^^^9^^^^^^^^HRHI^^^^H
Thomas Ivory was asked to report on its condition, and he too
recommended that it be taken down and replaced. Responsibility
for the building was shared between the church authorities and
the Corporation. On 17 January 1774 a joint committee resolved
that 'the plain plan omitting the rustick work laid before the com
mittee by Mr John Roberts for rebuilding the Cathedral appears
to be the most eligible of any as yet produced to us. Estimate,
?3,704.5s.6d. The old steeple to be taken down and the bells
placed in the French Church.'3 No doubt Bishop Chenevix, once
reconciled to the demolition of his beloved cathedral, favoured
Roberts's submission, but from this reference it is evident that
?: ; . financial considerations were
the main influence in the
committee's decision to
accept the 'plain plan'.
The startling project of
demolishing a fine medieval
cathedral, and its replace
ment by a new building in a
completely different style,
indicates the self-confidence
of Waterford's civic oligarchy
in the late 18th century.
Roberts' cathedral is slightly smaller than its predecessor
but occupies roughly the
1 Detail of one of
the richly carved
capitals in Christ
Church Cathedral
Photo: Carmel
Kikkers, Focus Visual
Communication
2 The nave of Christ
Church Cathedral
showing the
interventions by Thomas Drew prior to the recent
restoration
programme Photo: Carmel
Kikkers, Focus Visual
Communication
3 Christ Church
Cathedral pen and
ink drawing by Charles Newport Bolton c. 1874
4 Thomas Malt?n snr. Interior of the
Cathedral of St
Peter's, (Christ
Church) Waterford c. 1790 del.
(Courtesy of National
Library of Ireland PD
1742C)
SPRING 2004 I RI S 11 AR T S R E V I E W |
103
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 4: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/4.jpg)
HONEST JOHN ROBERTS We know more about the personality of John Roberts than about most Waterford peo
ple of his time. However, most of our information comes from one source: the narra
tive written by his grand-daughter Margaret Price for the edification of her
great-nephews and -nieces. Her work is exactly what we might expect of an elderly
great-aunt: prejudiced, anecdotal, weak on solid fact and devoid of chronology.
?' I
Roberts is generally said to have been born in 1712.
However, the register of Trinity Parish states that he was
born on 26 January 1714, the son of Thomas Roberts (a
local builder) and Elizabeth Bowles. His early years were
not easy. His mother died young; his father remarried
and neglected his first family. Young John took himself
off to London, where he worked as apprentice to a car
penter and studied architecture (which is all we know of
his formal training).
John's runaway match with Mary Susannah Sautelle
is obviously not recorded in the local registers. It can
hardly have been the teenage fling implied in most
accounts, for their eldest child was not baptized until
1744, when Roberts was thirty. The young couple found
life pretty tough, with Roberts's three unmarried sisters
and his half-brother Benjamin to feed, besides their own
children. But John was resourceful. He sent his sisters to live in Dublin (where they
eventually married successfully), bound his half-brother as apprentice to a cabinet
maker, and pursued his own career as architect and builder.
As for their own children, Miss Price assures us brightly that there were twenty-one of them, adding almost casually that eight survived to adulthood. They were a talented
bunch. John the eldest son was taught Latin by the ever-helpful Bishop Chenevix,
became a clergyman, and was rector of Passage East for many years. Samuel the sec
ond son became an attorney. The third son, Thomas, is now reckoned to have been
one of the finest landscape painters of his day (Fig 5 & 6). After his premature death
in 1778 his reputation was continued by the fifth son, Sautelle, who had originally trained as an architect under Thomas Ivory. One of the daughters, Flora, was also a
noted landscape painter and did some scenery for the Waterford Theatre.
John Roberts seems to have had little regard for worldly luxuries. One of his fads
was that he would never buy new clothes. When his wife thought he needed them, she simply stole away the old article while he was asleep and left the new one in its
place -
he never seemed to notice. He was enormously respected by his workforce -
Honest John was their nickname for him. Payday was on Saturday morning, and
Roberts was careful to give half the wages to the men's wives so that they could go
off to the market and buy food at the best price, rather than just hope there would
be something left over when their husbands eventually found their way home. And
the husbands were paid in small change, so that they would not be 'inconvenienced'
by having to go into the pubs to get change. Roberts descendants are legion and have distinguished themselves throughout the
globe and in all walks of life. One of his great-grandsons, Samuel Ussher Roberts,
also achieved fame as an architect, his most stunning achievement being Kylemore
near Letterfrack in Connemara, the fairytale castle which he built for a rich
Merseyside industrialist. Nearer home, he built Gurteen Castle near Kilsheelan for
the first Count De la Poer, transformed John Roberts's Georgian block at Faithlegg into a Victorian mansion, and recased the exterior of Curraghmore.
Roberts's most renowned descendant was undoubtedly another great-grandson,
Field Marshal Earl Roberts, V C, of Kandahar, Pretoria and Waterford. There is a curi
ous parallel between the deaths of the architect and the soldier-hero. Both men died
at the same age (eighty-two) and of the same cause (pneumonia). In both cases their
deaths were the result of conscientiously fulfilling duties that could safely have been
left to younger people - the field marshal valiantly attempting to boost the morale of
the wretched Indian troops brought to serve on the Western Front, and John Roberts
supervising the work being done on the Roman Catholic Cathedral of Waterford.
same ground. Erected on high ground in the heart of the old
Viking city, and surmounted by a steeple nearly 200 feet high, it
still dominates the urban landscape. The western fa?ade, as seen
from the garden of the apartments built for the widows of clergy
men in 1700, is dominated by an imposing portico, behind which
rises a lofty tower on which is built the steeple (Fig 3). Roberts
carefully followed the prevailing notion of the correct order of
classical columns: simple Doric capitals for the portico, Ionic
swirls for those on the tower, and Corinthian luxuriance for the
capitals under the base of the spire.
The interior of Roberts' cathedral is of unusual design, though
the influence of Gibbs' London churches is everywhere, particularly
that of St Martin's-in-the-Fields. The west end is dominated by a
large vestibule, now filled with monuments, including the macabre
15th-century tomb of Mayor James Rice, thrown out by Roberts'
workmen but brought back a hundred years later and now regarded
as one of Ireland's most important medieval funerary monuments.
On either side are the vestry and consistorial courtroom, while over
head a gallery leads to the diocesan library. From the vestibule one
looks through rows of Corinthian columns (Fig 1) along the nave to
the beautiful pedimented reredos at the west end.
An engraving by Thomas Malt?n senior of c.l 790 gives a clear
impression of the interior of the cathedral at that time (Fig 4). We
see the fine carved balconies supported by the piers below.
Underneath the galleries were the box pews which also took up
most of the centre aisle. The liturgy in Roberts's day consisted
mainly of morning and evening prayer, in which the sermon pro
vided the climax; the huge three-decker pulpit, centrally placed
where nave and chancel met, was therefore the focus of attention.
At the west end of the nave were a cross gallery and screen sup
7 Staircase of the Waterford Chamber of
Commerce (Courtesy Waterford Museum of
Treasures)
10 4 I
IRISH ART S R E V IE W S P RING 2004
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 5: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/5.jpg)
ARCHITECTURE I CLASSICISM AND CIVILITY
ported by fluted Ionic columns which held the organ and divided
the nave from the vestibule.
Like most such projects, then and now, the new cathedral ran
over time and over budget, the final cost being ?5,397. Alas, the
By the end of the 19th century Pugin and his followers had thoroughly denigrated the suitability of classical architecture for Christian churches
kindly Bishop Chenevix did not live to see its completion, and it
fell to his successor Bishop Newcome to consecrate the body of
the church on 21 May 1780. The steeple remained to be built;
subscriptions were still being sought for the work in 1783 and it
was not completed until December 1788.4
By the end of the 19th century Pugin and his followers had thor
oughly denigrated the suitability of classical architecture for
Christian churches, while new liturgical practices stressed the
Eucharist at the expense of the preaching of the Word. Radical alter
ations to Roberts's cathedral were carried out by Sir Thomas Drew
who, dismissing Roberts's expertise, removed the galleries, blocked
up the lower nave windows, and relocated organ and pulpit, while
a huge arch opened up a new vista between vestibule and nave (Fig
2). Damaging to the structure and lacking in sensitivity towards the
original, Drew's intervention is regarded today as regrettable. As
part of the recent and comprehensive restoration programme, the
organ gallery has been restored to its original position.
By the end of the 1770s, therefore, Roberts' achievement was
considerable. His career to this point is well summarised in a letter
written in May 1775 by Bishop Chenevix to his Limerick colleague: 'I can send an architect from this place, one whose integrity,
skill and experience I have long been acquainted with, he having finished the episcopal house, and he has built two houses for me,
and on whose report the trustees (I am certain) may safely rely.
He is well known to the Archbishop of Cashel, Lord Tyrone
(whose fine offices he built), and the chief gentlemen of this
county, having been employed by most of them in considerable
buildings and to their entire satisfaction, and he has now under
taken the rebuilding of the Cathedral of Water ford, his plan hav
ing been approved of by the Corporation and the Clergy'.5
The reference to Roberts' work for 'the chief gentlemen of this
county' is all too tantalising. Which country houses exactly did
he build? We may surmise that Faithlegg House, completed in
1783 for Cornelius Bolton, was his work. Certainly his relation
ship with Bolton was a close one, and around this time the latter
leased to him part of Faithlegg townland with the unappetizing
name of Knockrotton, where Roberts built his own country seat,
which he named Roberts Mount. Nothing remains of it today. He
is also credited with the work done at this period at the home of
5 Thomas Roberts
(1748-1778)
landscape painter, third son of John
and Mary Susannah
Roberts (Courtesy of
the late Lt. Col.
Robert Going)
6 Thomas Sautelle
Roberts West View
of the City of
Waterford 1795
aquatint 31.2 x
46.5cm (Courtesy Waterford Museum
of Treasures)
8 Stuccowork on the stairwell of the
Chamber of Commerce attrib. to
Patrick Osbourne (Courtesy Waterford Museum of Treasures)
m
9 Chamber of Commerce
Waterford (Courtesy Waterford
City Council)
D
^^p/J? JP* jj, Kl Mjp? n^^H
; _M _ _ _^fcl Jag^, ^^H ^^^B ^^^H "^^^HJ^V 'ammmmmmmm.
' ^^H ^^^B ^^^H
SPRING 2004 105
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 6: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/6.jpg)
w rs
E! -
-_-|;! _E.
s_
_s;_ _ffi_ _
__ffi_X_
i_1 T _
='s_ ! sS'
,2 ''' ''ut
p!''z'gPbt [;'^ w
i:]RIIh
- :i:E
'
'_;
L
1ff1
the Leigh family at Rosegarland in County Wexford, where the
staircase bears a striking resemblance to that of Waterford's
Chamber of Commerce. It is also evident from the Bishop's letter
that he worked farther afield; he has even been credited with
building Moore Hall in Co. Mayo and Tyrone House in Co.
Galway (but could there be some confusion here with Lord
Tyrone's 4fine offices' at Curraghmore?)6
One residence that can confidently be attributed to Roberts is
Newtown House, in the eastern suburbs of Waterford, built as
the country seat of the Catholic landowner John Wyse.7 A con
temporary painting shows John Wyse, his wife and brother enjoy
ing a musical interlude in the drawing-room.8 Alas, John Wyse's
enjoyment of his new home was brief. By the time of his death in
1799, laden with debts, Newtown had been sold to the Society of Friends for their provincial boarding school. When the
Pennsylvania Quaker William Savery visited the house early in
1798, he found his co-religionists busily removing the stuccowork
that can dimly be seen in the background of the painting,
together with other offensive ornamentation.9
Meanwhile, Roberts continued his work on public buildings.
It says much for the wealth and self-confidence of
Waterford's Catholics that
they should choose this moment to erect what in fact was Ireland's first post-Reformation
Catholic Cathedral
The medieval leper house in Stephen Street had been closed by the city fathers owing to a mystifying shortage of lepers, but the
diocesan chancellor, the Rev. William Downes, compelled them
to use the funds for the erection of a new hospital for the relief
of the sick and maimed poor of the city. This was designed and
built by Roberts on an imposing site at the foot of John's Hill to
the east of the city, and was completed in 1785. It is a large build
ing of fifteen bays and three storeys over a basement. It became
the City and County Infirmary in 1897, was closed in 1986, and
after a long period of neglect and vandalism is at last being con
verted to new usage.
In 1784 Roberts was a member of a consortium that leased from
the Corporation 'a plot of ground, formerly a garden, under
Dunderry wall' as the site for a playhouse and assembly hall.10
Completed by Roberts in 1788, it is a large, nine-bay, two-storey
building sited on the Mall, more subtle in style than its two robust
neighbours, the Bishop's Palace and Cathedral. The interior is dom
inated by a huge staircase leading to rooms of imposing size. In 1813
the Corporation bought out the lease for ?3,000 and transferred the
city offices there from the old exchange on the Quay. The Assembly
Rooms then became the Town Hall, but the 'playhouse' - now the
Theatre Royal - has continued in part of the building.
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions
![Page 7: Classicism and Civility](https://reader030.vdocument.in/reader030/viewer/2022020313/57509e651a28abbf6b1074f7/html5/thumbnails/7.jpg)
ARCHITECTURE
CLASSICISM AND CIVILITY
Roberts' finest secular creation is undoubtedly the splendid house he built at a cost of ?10,000 for William Morris, one of the
city's wealthiest merchants. Imposingly sited in what is now
O'Connell Street, it faces down Gladstone Street to the river. It is
of six bays and four-storeys over a basement. (Fig 9) There is a beau
tiful wide Doric doorcase with large fanlight. Inside there is a series
of fine reception rooms adorned with exquisite stuccowork. This
has been attributed to Patrick Osborne the Waterford stuccodore, but is perhaps closer in style to the work of Michael Stapleton. At
the back of the entrance-hall, a door to the left leads to the finest
feature of the house, the oval staircase. The lofty stairwell sur
mounted by a dome and lit by a skylight; the beautifully curved
doorways leading off the stairwell; the stairs themselves with their
brass balustrade; the delicate friezes of flowers and deer; and the
plaster eagles in high relief that surround the dome - these features
make up one of the most elegant staircases in Ireland. (figs 7& 8)
William Morris, for whom this palatial residence was built, never
lived to see it completed. We know from a codicil to his will dated
31 January 1785 that it was then under construction; he died a few
days later." In 1813 his family sold it for a mere ?2,500 to the city's
Chamber of Commerce. Perhaps the finest town house left in
Ireland, it is currently up for sale, its fate ominously uncertain.
In 1792 the Roman Catholics of Waterford obtained from the
Corporation a lease of land on which to build a new church, John Roberts was commissioned for this task, and building commenced
in 1793. It was an astonishingly ambitious undertaking, for the
remaining penal laws were still being dismantled in that year.
Moreover, there were already two Catholic churches in the city, the
Great Chapel in Barronstrand Street and the New Chapel, now St
Patrick's Church, besides several smaller mass-houses. It says much
for the wealth and self-confidence of Waterford's Catholics that
they should choose this moment to erect what in fact was Ireland's
first post-Reformation Catholic cathedral (Figs 11 &1 2).
The Great Chapel was demolished and the new building erected at right angles on the extended site. It is almost square in
plan, with a vast open interior, the ceiling supported on a forest
of fourteen giant Corinthian columns with gilded capitals. On
each side are bow-fronted balconies supported by Ionic columns,
and a third balcony at the west end holds the organ. The decora
tion of the woodwork is delicate and contrasts with the might of
the columns, round which the balcony fronts weave gracefully.
During the following century the ever wealthier Catholic com
munity enlarged the east end and adorned it with sumptuous fur
nishings - high altar, baldachino, chapter stalls, altar rails, and
magnificent oak pulpit; but the rest of the cathedral is much as
Roberts designed it - spacious, restrained and inspiring.
This, Roberts' last work, is also his masterpiece - 'a perfect epit ome of Georgian taste ... possibly the greatest forgotten building in
the history of 18th-century building in Ireland'.12 The work must
have been nearing completion when he died on 24 May 1796. The
facade was left unfinished, perhaps owing to the instability of the
site, until 1893. He was buried, not with his ancestors in the
medieval graveyard of St John's, but with his wife's Huguenot rela
tions in the old Franciscan friary, the 'French Church'. Their rest
ing-place is marked by a modest wall-plaque. His contribution to
the development of his native city was largely forgotten in modern
times, until in 1996 local historians (including the present writer)
demanded that his achievement be acknowledged on the bicente
nary of his death. Today the city's most central thoroughfare is
renamed John Roberts Square, and events in his honour are held
annually during the first weekend of May. Waterford is unique in Ireland for the number and quality of
its 18th-century public buildings, and the fact that nearly all of
these were the work of one local architect; unique, too, in that
Protestant and Catholic cathedrals were designed and built by the same man. Like Sir Christopher Wren, John Roberts could
well have remarked: Si monumentum requieris, circumspice. U
JULIAN WALTON is a local historian and works as a project assistant in the Boole
Library, University College, Cork.
I acknowledge with thanks the generous assistance of William Fraher (Dungarvan Museum), Eamonn McEneaney and Rosemary Ryan (Waterford Treasures), Donal
Moore (Waterford City Archives), Peter Lamb (art historian), Hilary Murphy and Fithnp Scallan (WPYfnrrd)
Sources: William Fraher: 'John Roberts, architect, 1712-1796' (thesis, Waterford RTC, 1983). Peter Galloway: The Cathedrals of Ireland Belfast, 1992.
Mark Girouard: 'The noblest quay in Europe' Country Life, 8, 15 and 22 Dec. 1963;
reprinted in the author's Town and Country, Yale, 1992, pp 149-168). Mark Girouard: 'Curraghmore, Co. Waterford Eire' Country Life, 7, 14 and 21 Feb.
1963. John Redmill: 'Christ Church Cathedral, Waterford: A feasibility study' (1993).
Margaret Price: 'The French settlers in Waterford after the revocation of the Edict
of Nantes' (1853); transcript with notes by Matthew Butler in possession of the
author. Transcript also in National Archives.
Minute-books of Waterford Corporation, 1700-1837.
W.J. Bayly, 'The Roberts family of Waterford', Jnl of the Waterford and S E of
Ireland Arch. Soc., II (1896), pp 98-103.
1 Edward McParland, Public architecture in
Ireland 1680-1760 (Yale, 2001), p. 136.
2 N Ruddock and N Kloss, Unending worship: A
History of Saint Iberius Church, Wexford
(Wexford, 1997), p.11. 3 Cited in W J Bayly, 'Roberts family', p. 101.
4 MS note in Waterford Treasures copy of [G.
Wilson], Historical remarks of the city of
Waterford [Waterford, c.1736]
5 Limerick MSS, National Library of Ireland, no. 19.
6 G St G Mark: 'Tyrone House' Irish Georgian
Society Bulletin, July-Dec. 1976.
7 Maurice Wigham, Newtown School, Waterford, 1798-1998: A history (Waterford, 1998), p.14: "R.J. Greer, when Superintendant of the school, [wrote] in an article in The Newtown Journal
1863-64: 'The architect being John Roberts,
great-grandfather to our present pupil, William."'
8 See article on Wyse family in this magazine. 9 Diary of William Savery: transcript in Library of
the Society of Friends, Dublin.
10 'Deed in Waterford City Archives.
11 H F Morris and T Reade Duncan, 'The Reades of
cos Tipperary and Kilkenny', Irish Genealogist, VIII (1990-93), pp 29-30.
12 Alastair Rowan: God's Houses. II: The Irish
Georgian Church (RTE, 1988).
10 The courtyard at
Curragmore Co.
Waterford
11 Holy Trinity
Cathedral, interior
12 The facade of
Holy Trinity Cathedral
13 SAMUEL FREDERICK
BROCAS C. 1812 View
of the Bishop's
Palace, New Rooms
and Mall, Waterford.
watercolour
(Collection Sir
Robert Goff)
SPRING( 2004 IRISH ARTS REVIEW | 107
This content downloaded from 195.78.108.163 on Sat, 14 Jun 2014 13:37:05 PMAll use subject to JSTOR Terms and Conditions